In article <3251c898.19227...@news.enterprise.net> pand...@enterprise.net

                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

One of the great joys of this newsgroup:  the Ballistic Buff!

.John

some things are intolerable,
one such intolerable thing is a mcadams post,
the man is CIA.
he is here with an agenda,
he doesn't even bother to hide that fact.

QUOTE ON

QUOTE OFF

--
Spam E-mail Will Be met with a gratefull reply of:
10,000 to 1 for first time offenders,
1,000,000 to one for second time offenders,
and total shutdown for third time offenders.
As I believe in the joy of giving, more than the joy of receiving,
Spammers take notice. ;-)

Keven S. Caddeo,
THE JFK ASSASSINATION PAGE,
HTTP://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/4523

In article <33015550.4...@accent.net>,
Keven S. Caddeo <it...@accent.net> wrote:

 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Great, Kevin.   Now you are cooperating with my nefarious plan to ruin the
newsgroup!  Let me tell you, pal, I appreciate it.

.John

 You must be a VERY,VERY lonely person. So much effort put in on
drivel. All alone in your 3 room apt,with nothing more to do in life
but read and post in this NG. Personally I couldn't care less if
you're CIA or simply an unimportant malcontent with(unfortunately)
Internet access. Mouthing the WC with absolutely no individual
thought. Stupid attempts at degrading others with the foolish notion
that anybody actually cares. Type away Johnny!.......sad ......so very
very sad.................Must be lonely in that dark lit room

From - Sun Feb 16 13:42:31 1997
From: pand...@enterprise.net (Bill MacDowall)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
Subject: The John McAdams FAQ
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 14:48:33 GMT
Organization: Enterprise PLC - Internet Services
Message-ID: <33071e32.10137494@news.enterprise.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: max08-224.enterprise.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99e/32.227
Lines: 257
Path:
news.total.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!nic.mtl.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!news .pbi.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnpla net.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!netcom.net.uk!netcom-uk-feed0!news.en terprise.net!usenet

This FAQ exists to answer some of the most frequently asked questions
about John McAdams.   It may be copied by McAdams to counter the
effect the truth will have on his already frazzled reputation but then
imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

This FAQ will be posted regularly to forewarn new users of the dangers
of becoming another McAdams victim.

1.         Who is John McAdams?

             John McAdams is a professor of political science employed

             in the Jesuit Marquette University (hard to believe but  
             true).

2.          Is John McAdams hell-bent on destroying this group?

             Sadly yes.  His own words appended below summarise his
             intentions better than I could.

From jmcad...@primenet.com Sat Feb 15 05:17:02 1997
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
Subject: Re: Blown back by shot
From: jmcad...@primenet.com (John McAdams)
Date: 14 Feb 1997 22:17:02 -0700

You buffs have been cooperating marvelously with my scheme to make
this group a shambles. And you know the bizzare part?  My scheme is
not a secret.  I have publicly announced it.  I have made it perfectly
obvious.  I have rubbed you buffs' noses in it. It's blatantly
obviously to everybody.

 .John

This recent post by McAdams should be viewed in terms of the Charter
he submitted as part of the process of forming the moderated JFK
group:

CHARTER AND MODERATION POLICY

This group will be for the purpose of providing an area for serious
discussion and research of the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy.
The group will be moderated to prevent the noise and chronic personal
attacks which have plagued alt.conspiracy.jfk and made it nearly
useless as a vehicle for intelligent research. Questions surrounding
JFK's death have made this one of the most talked about and
controversial issues of our generation.  This will be the one
usenet group which deals seriously with this important topic.

One supposes that since the noise and chronic personal attacks which
have plagued the alt.conspiracy.jfk group were and are part of McAdams
freely admitted plans to turn the group into a shambles, the moderated
group can only be seen as his personal vehicle for selective
manipulation of content.

3.       Is McAdams connected to the CIA?

          Many people have suggested he is and it would not be  
          difficult to imagine how useful a professor of political  
          science at a respected university would be as a CIA asset.
          It is impossible to know if McAdams has "company" links but
          his background and behaviour may shed some light.  The
          following is a quote from a letter written by McAdams to the
          Milwaukee Sentinel Newspaper:

          (Dr) Gary Aguilar accused me on the politics forum of being
           A CIA sponsored disinformationist because I was once the
          Marquette Official representative of the I.C.P.S.R.  an
          utterly unspooky social science data archive.

          The article below throws some light on just how "un-spooky"
          the ICPSR actually is

Not being widely known outside its narrow
area of research the ICPSR may not register
with most people, but if you are familiar with
intelligence and covert action, you will recognize
that some of their "classes" deal in "nation
building" concept, which is what the interventionists
call it when they set up a puppet government
through subversion of the existing institutions
of said nation.

The ICPSR is housed in the Institute for Social
Research, or ISR which itself has been documented
has recipient of spook research grants.

This is a repost of something Lisa Pease posted
a while back that elaborates on these spook
research grants and also contains Mcadams'
admission, if not boast, that he was at one
time "official representative" to ICPSR.

They have a web page, so you can
check it out for yourself.  You may
notice studies on assassinations
and the courses on the "formation
of elites" in Chile etc..

The URL is: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/

          Of course, McAdams may or may not be connected
          with the CIA,  you pay your money and take your chance
          in dealing with him.

4.       Has McAdams any track record in covert-type activity?

          It seems he has.  McAdams attended the 1995 Copa
          Conference using the assumed name Paul Nolan.  More than
          that, he also fabricated a background to go with the name  
          in that he purported himself to be a jet-propulsion expert

          and some-time computer store owner from Sherwood,
          Wisconsin.  In that guise, he was quoted in an article in
          the Washington press by journalist Matt Labash.  Mr Labash
          later confirmed that McAdams had duped him.  Mr Labash had
          quoted Paul (McAdams) Nolan in good faith whilst in fact
          McAdams was lying through his teeth.  McAdams later claimed
          he had used an assumed name to avoid contact with users of
          the alt.conspircay group who may have been attending the  
          conference.  With McAdams record of wilfully abusing users

          of the group, this story might seem plausible but going to  
          trouble of inventing a detailed cover story and lying to the

          press have more sinister overtones.

5.       Has McAdams accused other group users of pedophilia and
          drug abuse?

          He most certainly has.  In 1997 McAdams openly accused one
          Stuart Lyster of having served time in prison for child  
          abuse and accused Dr Gary Aguilar of being a drug addict.  
          In the light of McAdams behaviour in the group and his other
          activities such as at the Copa Conference, Stuart Lyster  
          asked McAdams explain his motives in using this group and in
          return posted the following offensive reply:

From: 6489mcada...@vms.csd.mu.edu (John McAdams)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
Subject: Re: A cornered rat turns vicious
Date: 12 Sep 1995 13:04:53 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services

In article <405_9509091...@miratel.uniserve.com>,

Stuart, you've first got to address charges that you are a pedophile
who has served time in jail for molesting young children.

I'm going to keep after you on this until you respond.

.John

            This reply earned McAdams coverage in the Milwaukee
            Sentinal newspaper:

By Tom Vanden Brook
of the Journal Sentinel staff
___________________

A Marquette University professor who hurled profane insults
across the Internet - including accusations of drug use and
pedophilia - has been chastised by university officials, has
annoyed people across the country, and has sparked a small,
intense debate on etiquette in cyberspace.

John McAdams, a political science professor who teaches a
course on the Kennedy assassination and has created a home
page on the World Wide Web devoted to the topic, admitted
to using blue prose in computer correspondence.

But he defended himself by saying he was responding in kind
to people he says are viciously critical of his views on the
assassination of President John F. Kennedy. "The Internet used
to be a reasonable place to discuss the Kennedy assassination,"
 McAdams said. "Now, it's a complete 'flamefest'."

"Flaming," in Internet circles, refers to diabribes aimed at
those with differing viewpoints. McAdams is a vocal opponent
of academics and others who ascribe to various conspiracy
theories concerning the assassination.

Last fall, participants in an assassination discussion group
complained to the Roman Catholic university about McAdams'
profane references to them on computer bulletin boards. Gary
Aguilar, a San Francisco surgeon, said he contacted MU after
McAdams asked him to respond to charges that he had used drugs.
Aguilar vehemently denies using drugs.

"He's extremely ...

read more »

From - Sun Feb 16 13:42:31 1997
From: pand...@enterprise.net (Bill MacDowall)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
Subject: The John McAdams FAQ
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 14:48:33 GMT
Organization: Enterprise PLC - Internet Services
Message-ID: <33071e32.10137494@news.enterprise.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: max08-224.enterprise.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99e/32.227
Lines: 257
Path:
news.total.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!nic.mtl.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!news .pbi.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnpla net.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!netcom.net.uk!netcom-uk-feed0!news.en terprise.net!usenet

This FAQ exists to answer some of the most frequently asked questions
about John McAdams.   It may be copied by McAdams to counter the
effect the truth will have on his already frazzled reputation but then
imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

This FAQ will be posted regularly to forewarn new users of the dangers
of becoming another McAdams victim.

1.         Who is John McAdams?

             John McAdams is a professor of political science employed

             in the Jesuit Marquette University (hard to believe but  
             true).

2.          Is John McAdams hell-bent on destroying this group?

             Sadly yes.  His own words appended below summarise his
             intentions better than I could.

From jmcad...@primenet.com Sat Feb 15 05:17:02 1997
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
Subject: Re: Blown back by shot
From: jmcad...@primenet.com (John McAdams)
Date: 14 Feb 1997 22:17:02 -0700

You buffs have been cooperating marvelously with my scheme to make
this group a shambles. And you know the bizzare part?  My scheme is
not a secret.  I have publicly announced it.  I have made it perfectly
obvious.  I have rubbed you buffs' noses in it. It's blatantly
obviously to everybody.

 .John

This recent post by McAdams should be viewed in terms of the Charter
he submitted as part of the process of forming the moderated JFK
group:

CHARTER AND MODERATION POLICY

This group will be for the purpose of providing an area for serious
discussion and research of the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy.
The group will be moderated to prevent the noise and chronic personal
attacks which have plagued alt.conspiracy.jfk and made it nearly
useless as a vehicle for intelligent research. Questions surrounding
JFK's death have made this one of the most talked about and
controversial issues of our generation.  This will be the one
usenet group which deals seriously with this important topic.

One supposes that since the noise and chronic personal attacks which
have plagued the alt.conspiracy.jfk group were and are part of McAdams
freely admitted plans to turn the group into a shambles, the moderated
group can only be seen as his personal vehicle for selective
manipulation of content.

3.       Is McAdams connected to the CIA?

          Many people have suggested he is and it would not be  
          difficult to imagine how useful a professor of political  
          science at a respected university would be as a CIA asset.
          It is impossible to know if McAdams has "company" links but
          his background and behaviour may shed some light.  The
          following is a quote from a letter written by McAdams to the
          Milwaukee Sentinel Newspaper:

          (Dr) Gary Aguilar accused me on the politics forum of being
           A CIA sponsored disinformationist because I was once the
          Marquette Official representative of the I.C.P.S.R.  an
          utterly unspooky social science data archive.

          The article below throws some light on just how "un-spooky"
          the ICPSR actually is

Not being widely known outside its narrow
area of research the ICPSR may not register
with most people, but if you are familiar with
intelligence and covert action, you will recognize
that some of their "classes" deal in "nation
building" concept, which is what the interventionists
call it when they set up a puppet government
through subversion of the existing institutions
of said nation.

The ICPSR is housed in the Institute for Social
Research, or ISR which itself has been documented
has recipient of spook research grants.

This is a repost of something Lisa Pease posted
a while back that elaborates on these spook
research grants and also contains Mcadams'
admission, if not boast, that he was at one
time "official representative" to ICPSR.

They have a web page, so you can
check it out for yourself.  You may
notice studies on assassinations
and the courses on the "formation
of elites" in Chile etc..

The URL is: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/

          Of course, McAdams may or may not be connected
          with the CIA,  you pay your money and take your chance
          in dealing with him.

4.       Has McAdams any track record in covert-type activity?

          It seems he has.  McAdams attended the 1995 Copa
          Conference using the assumed name Paul Nolan.  More than
          that, he also fabricated a background to go with the name  
          in that he purported himself to be a jet-propulsion expert

          and some-time computer store owner from Sherwood,
          Wisconsin.  In that guise, he was quoted in an article in
          the Washington press by journalist Matt Labash.  Mr Labash
          later confirmed that McAdams had duped him.  Mr Labash had
          quoted Paul (McAdams) Nolan in good faith whilst in fact
          McAdams was lying through his teeth.  McAdams later claimed
          he had used an assumed name to avoid contact with users of
          the alt.conspircay group who may have been attending the  
          conference.  With McAdams record of wilfully abusing users

          of the group, this story might seem plausible but going to  
          trouble of inventing a detailed cover story and lying to the

          press have more sinister overtones.

5.       Has McAdams accused other group users of pedophilia and
          drug abuse?

          He most certainly has.  In 1997 McAdams openly accused one
          Stuart Lyster of having served time in prison for child  
          abuse and accused Dr Gary Aguilar of being a drug addict.  
          In the light of McAdams behaviour in the group and his other
          activities such as at the Copa Conference, Stuart Lyster  
          asked McAdams explain his motives in using this group and in
          return posted the following offensive reply:

From: 6489mcada...@vms.csd.mu.edu (John McAdams)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
Subject: Re: A cornered rat turns vicious
Date: 12 Sep 1995 13:04:53 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services

In article <405_9509091...@miratel.uniserve.com>,

Stuart, you've first got to address charges that you are a pedophile
who has served time in jail for molesting young children.

I'm going to keep after you on this until you respond.

.John

            This reply earned McAdams coverage in the Milwaukee
            Sentinal newspaper:

By Tom Vanden Brook
of the Journal Sentinel staff
___________________

A Marquette University professor who hurled profane insults
across the Internet - including accusations of drug use and
pedophilia - has been chastised by university officials, has
annoyed people across the country, and has sparked a small,
intense debate on etiquette in cyberspace.

John McAdams, a political science professor who teaches a
course on the Kennedy assassination and has created a home
page on the World Wide Web devoted to the topic, admitted
to using blue prose in computer correspondence.

But he defended himself by saying he was responding in kind
to people he says are viciously critical of his views on the
assassination of President John F. Kennedy. "The Internet used
to be a reasonable place to discuss the Kennedy assassination,"
 McAdams said. "Now, it's a complete 'flamefest'."

"Flaming," in Internet circles, refers to diabribes aimed at
those with differing viewpoints. McAdams is a vocal opponent
of academics and others who ascribe to various conspiracy
theories concerning the assassination.

Last fall, participants in an assassination discussion group
complained to the Roman Catholic university about McAdams'
profane references to them on computer bulletin boards. Gary
Aguilar, a San Francisco surgeon, said he contacted MU after
McAdams asked him to respond to charges that he had used drugs.
Aguilar vehemently denies using drugs.

"He's extremely ...

read more »

In article <5e7j6o$1c...@ramp2.tir.com>,
Rev Jerry Falwell <Falw...@Gawd.almighty.organ> wrote:

 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It really does boggle the mind.  From the buffs it's flame after flame.
The consequence is predictable.  Repost after repost!

.John

Keven Caddeo has already been demonstrated to be CIA (by the buff's own
standards of proof). These latest attacks by Keven is simply an attempt
to weasel out of the fact that his cover has been blown and his handlers
will be recalling him soon.

Since it is well established that Keven is CIA, I don't think we should
give much credence to his claims about others being CIA. Pure
disinformation, that is what Keven is all about.

Regards,

Michael Cortese

||<*>|--------------------------------|<*>||
           Michael Gordon Cortese
            hypat...@hi-inc.com
      http://www.chewable.com/hypatian/  
||<*>|--------------------------------|<*>||
"If 50 million people believe a foolish thing,
 it is still a foolish thing" --Anatole France

I think my tongue is impaled in my cheek now.

  Mr.Cortese,I would have thought by now that by applying your version
of so-called buff-logic,you would have figured out that Mr.Caddeo is
not one of the Sisters,but comes from another La Familia altogether.
I don't know about you but I for one,would be quite respectfull of
the Goombas,as I have no wish to subscribe to the Jimmy Hoffa Retire-
ment Plan:-0

  Regards,
  John(Sorry Keven,sometimes I just can't help myself:-)Ritchson

In article , MGC says...

If Keven sez John McAdams is CIA and you say Keven is CIA,  then the
only logical conclusion is that YOU are CIA.  And I offer the following
as proof: you use the handle "MGC" which is an obvious TLA
for "Mighty Good Cover."

I will shortly be publishing a very short book titled: "A List of Everyone
Who is NOT a spook."

Joel Grant

Everyone
Who is NOT a spook."

Joel Grant<<<

Let me guess:

1. OJ
2. Mother Theresa (Not sure about this one)
3. John-Paul II (Oops, forgot. Someone wrote a book about him and Reagan.
Scratch this one)
4. Flipper
5. R2D2

Did I miss anyone?

In article , jec8...@aol.com says...

If he was CIA he would have won the civil suit, too.

Member of the Bildenbergers.

Thank you.

Prototypes secret underwater spy technology.

The epitome of walking spy technology.

Stephen A. Jones, age 12, resident, Camden, NJ.  I don't know
how they missed him.

Joel

John, Il mio piccolo porco, I just file anti-Italian slurs where they
belong....and a happy va fa en culo to you.
--
Regards,

Michael Cortese
(After 2/28/97 please use the hi-inc.com e-mail address)
||<*>|--------------------------------|<*>||
           Michael Gordon Cortese
            hypat...@hi-inc.com
      http://www.chewable.com/hypatian/
||<*>|--------------------------------|<*>||
"If 50 million people believe a foolish thing,
 it is still a foolish thing" --Anatole France

Stephen is a spook, Joel, but he just has an excellent cover. Don't you
remember him from the last spook annual convention? When he is not a 12
year-old boy he looks like a 250 lb guy who smokes Phillies cheroots. I
can't believe you forgot about him after we "disappeared" some JFK
assasination witnesses together.
--
Regards,

Michael Cortese
(After 2/28/97 please use the hi-inc.com e-mail address)
||<*>|--------------------------------|<*>||
           Michael Gordon Cortese
            hypat...@hi-inc.com
      http://www.chewable.com/hypatian/
||<*>|--------------------------------|<*>||
"If 50 million people believe a foolish thing,
 it is still a foolish thing" --Anatole France

  Mr.Cortese,I would have thought by now that by applying your version
of so-called buff-logic,you would have figured out that Mr.Caddeo is
not one of the Sisters,but comes from another La Familia altogether.
I don't know about you but I for one,would be quite respectfull of
the Goombas,as I have no wish to subscribe to the Jimmy Hoffa Retire-
ment Plan:-0

  Regards,
  John(Sorry Keven,sometimes I just can't help myself:-)Ritchson

================================================================
JW:

Yes, and it's mighty cold under that Meadowlands end zone.

In article , MGC says...

Geez maleez!  I didn't know.  Now my short book is that much shorter.

I'll give the guy credit,though, his disguises rool!

Joel Grant

so this is the post everyone has been telling me about lately
sorry for not replying sooner but my ISP is very slow ;-)

Mike, you've outdone yourself. ;-)

ok,
some history,

we all know that John Mcadams is CIA,
that's a fact,
not an accusation, we've shown the evidence,
this includes, his spying on researchers using aliases,
and child molestation accusations against researchers,
etc...
it's been well documented by Bill Macdowall.
and we all owe him a debt of thanks for that wonderfully concise FAQ.

Now what Mcadams does is send his cronies here to disrupt the group,
they basically lie about the evidence,
when they are confronted with the truth,
they are subjected to abuse,
should they continue to spout the awfull truth,
Mcadams assigns someone to the researcher who is standing in the way.

if one does not work,
others are tried,
I've had paddon, first of all, then have had a string of others
in an attempt to shut me up.
this includes stager, hiatt, cortese (who wrote the post I am replying
to)
finally corbett,
corbett did not do well at all ;-)

now if they process does not work,
a new tact is tried,
either John Locke, or Mcadams himself will accuse the researcher of
child Molestation,
this is a last ditch effort to shut the researcher up.
Cortese himself tried this with me several times.

now all this invariably has the effect of making the researcher
occaisionally
lose his or her patience,
a nasty reply is bound to occur on occaision,
this is where Mcadams excells,
he then Reposts the researcher reply, while completely ignoring
the lone nut post that precipitated the researcher reply,
it is usually followed by some crisp comment ala "aren't these buffs
nice"
kind of snippit,

This is where we are all pissed off at Mcadams,
the reposts,
they are lies by nature, because they are VERY one sided.
not to mention provocative.
it's the equivelant of seeing an old lady getting mugged,
and then accusing her of being vicious because she kicked the mugger,

not to mention that we all find child molestation slurs repulsive.
cortese has made such slurs often,
refering to children, as well as animals.

now recently,
Bill Macdowall posted his FAQ on John Mcadams,
it details exactly who he is,
evidence that he is CIA, etc...
though it's only a sampler,
a book could be written on the evidence,
it is however, the most concise article written on the evidence
that Mcadams is indeed CIA,

On my part,
I decided that it was a usefull tool,
when Mcadams reposts, researchers posts,
he does so in an effort to destroy the News Group,
he himself admitted doing this very recently and several times,
he has made no secret of the fact that he wants this News Group destroy
so that he can control the internet debate through his censored news
Group.

as such,
I thought it important to point out who Mcadams was,
and decided to repost the FAQ to all his reposts,
he is free to discuss the assassination,
but if he chooses to attempt to destroy this News Group,
people have a right to know why.

so guess what happens,
Mike cortese comes on the News Group, just after my report campaign
starts
and accuses me of being CIA ;-)

let's see,
Mcadams has been proven by evidence to be CIA
Mike cortese is a friend of Mcadams,
mike is a lone nutter who states unequivicoly that the warren report
got it right
and that Posner is a great author and researcher ;-)

now he accuses me of being CIA,
How quaint ;-)

is there any doubt what these guys are doing?
they are here to divide us and to supress debate,
That is ultimatly why the case is so important,

the coup d'etat that occured in 1963 in dallas is not a historical
footnote,
it's here with us today,
it shapes government policy now,
it starts wars in the present.
people are being silenced and yes even killed right now.

that is why we must never stop investigating this until the truth is
known,
we must NEVER let them succeed.

it's not for the memory of JFK, though that would certainly be reason
enough,
it's for ourselves,
and it is for our children.

--
Spam E-mail Will Be met with a gratefull reply of:
10,000 to 1 for first time offenders,
1,000,000 to one for second time offenders,
and total shutdown for third time offenders.
As I believe in the joy of giving, more than the joy of receiving,
Spammers take notice. ;-)

Keven S. Caddeo,
THE JFK ASSASSINATION PAGE,
HTTP://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/4523

In article <3251c898.19227...@news.enterprise.net> pand...@enterprise.net

                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

One of the great joys of this newsgroup:  the Ballistic Buff!

.John

that's okay john,
you do realise though,
that we will now have to kill ya?
sorry but's it just part of the family traditions ;-)

p.s. do you like yankee stadium?

;-)

--
Spam E-mail Will Be met with a gratefull reply of:
10,000 to 1 for first time offenders,
1,000,000 to one for second time offenders,
and total shutdown for third time offenders.
As I believe in the joy of giving, more than the joy of receiving,
Spammers take notice. ;-)

Keven S. Caddeo,
THE JFK ASSASSINATION PAGE,
HTTP://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/4523

now you're gettin' into the spirit of things,

mr. ritchson,

we're waiting for you HA HA HA,
come alone.

:-)

--
Spam E-mail Will Be met with a gratefull reply of:
10,000 to 1 for first time offenders,
1,000,000 to one for second time offenders,
and total shutdown for third time offenders.
As I believe in the joy of giving, more than the joy of receiving,
Spammers take notice. ;-)

Keven S. Caddeo,
THE JFK ASSASSINATION PAGE,
HTTP://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/4523

probably a pamphlet ;-)

--
Spam E-mail Will Be met with a gratefull reply of:
10,000 to 1 for first time offenders,
1,000,000 to one for second time offenders,
and total shutdown for third time offenders.
As I believe in the joy of giving, more than the joy of receiving,
Spammers take notice. ;-)

Keven S. Caddeo,
THE JFK ASSASSINATION PAGE,
HTTP://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/4523

and I'm not all that sure about flipper ;-)

--
Spam E-mail Will Be met with a gratefull reply of:
10,000 to 1 for first time offenders,
1,000,000 to one for second time offenders,
and total shutdown for third time offenders.
As I believe in the joy of giving, more than the joy of receiving,
Spammers take notice. ;-)

Keven S. Caddeo,
THE JFK ASSASSINATION PAGE,
HTTP://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/4523

In article <3312021A.3...@accent.net>,
Keven S. Caddeo <it...@accent.net> wrote:

 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yes, Kevin, you are a *huge* threat to The Conspiracy.

They live in constant fear of your logic and your wit!

 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^

Gosh, Kevin, if you know about my Evil Plan, why don't you act to
frustrate it?  You could do that merely by stopping posts like this one?  

Why not?

Yep, it's a conspiracy, Kevin!

 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Debate?  What debate?  The debate is on the moderated group.

 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.John