news:dLudnS57IPgXECrS...@earthlink.com...
> news:nvKtr.7206$%E2....@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
> And I can quote from many others who were also there, who said the
> opposite.
And that leads you where exactly? Nearly fifty years on and you still have
nothing but myth and conjecture.
> You do realize the exact same thing can easily be said about you LN
> loons with your die-hard religious beliefs [that only an inept shooter
> (LHO) could do something even the FBI-experts couldn't replicate], and
> despite all the evidence and statements to the contrary *on those who were
> also there*.
Then after all these years and all of what you call "evidence" you should be
able to provide names, motives, method but alas, you have nothing but kook
paranoid bad guesses. Well done. Very convincing.
> Example: many eyewitnesses ran up the G.K. area hearing shots fired from
> there, and photos showed those eyewitnesses doing that.
Nobody saw a gunman there kook and you know it.
> Are you telling us *all of them* were simply mistaken on what they
> heard and/or also smelled gunsmoke???
Obviously kook. There is no evidence that anyone other than Oswald was
shooting.What is wrong with saying those witnesses were mistaken? People
make mistakes. It's really not such a big deal is it? A shocking and
terrifying thing had just occurred. People tend to do all sorts of strange
things when they're frightened and confused. No two people's perception of
the same event will be exactly the same, because their personal experience
of it will always be different and unique. Only a complete muppet would
claim otherwise. Unfortunately you have nothing but thin air to corroborate
your bullshit and we have evidence.
> And, for the coup d'grace to slay your little LN monster, how come
> *none* were called before the WC to testify, and/or were pressured to
> change their perceptions on where at least one shot came from?
> Hmmmm?
> You're completely out of your tree.
While you quite clearly are still in yours. Did you sleep through the
evolutionary process?
> Go back in there--and stay there.
You are a pissy little light weight who's got his panties in a wad because
you stood on your flaccid dick earlier in the thread. Now run along and try
to take your beating like a man, don't be such a baby, Paperboy. As I said
earlier .watch the video or don't. You're in evangelical mode with your OT
rants. Take your anti-pyschotic and calm down. You're embarassing yourself.
Oh and don't you think you owe the Junkie an apology for calling him a
"moroness" earlier little Miss Self-Righteous?