It sure like Lee Harvey Oswald to me, but thats a picture and maybe is
not even him.
Please respond,
new to the Internet so forgive any mistakes.
Thanks
Tino Patti
Atllanta Georgia
apat...@mindspring.com
Although there is no definitive answer to this, most serious and responsible
researchers now believe the man in the picture was not Oswald, but his
co-worker Bill Lovelady.
It is hard to point to one particular source, but if you have any faith in the
House Committee on Assassinations, their treatment of it is pretty
comprehesive.
oo
Dave
***Also, take a good look a the photograph
of the man in the doorway.
He has a high forehead.
Look at a picture of Oswald and one of
Lovelady.
Lovelady has a high forehead, Oswald does not.
Additionally, Lovelady was wearing a shirt with a crisscross design. Teh
pattern is not particularly noticeable in the doorway picture,
but if you look at the lower arm, you can see a stripe accross it. Oswald's
shirt had no stripes.
Lastly, two people who were also standing in the doorway, also identified
Lovelady as the person standing next to them, and Lovelady said he was the man
standing in the doorway.
***Ron Judge
And of course, Oswald himself never said he was on the steps when
interrogated. Yet it would have been an airtight alibi. He said
instead that he had been eating lunch on the ground floor, had gone to
get a Coke on the second floor, and at that moment was confronted by a
policeman (Baker).
--
Mike Dworetsky, Department of Physics
& Astronomy, University College London
Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT UK
email: m...@star.ucl.ac.uk
Michael Dworetsky wrote in message <35A7C2F7...@star.ucl.ac.uk>...
Of course, but it is not really relevant to this question because there
are other indicators that Oswald did not claim this as an alibi: (1) it
is also a fact that Oswald actually was confronted by a policeman just
as he is alleged to have said; (2) he had an opportunity to speak in
public at a news conference and did not mention watching the motorcade
from outside the building; (3) he seems not to have ever said this to
his wife.
There is also the fact that all the accounts of Oswald's interrogation
omit any mention of this as an alibi, but several contain references to
Oswald's own alibi. It is extremely far-fetched to believe that they
were colluding to conceal this 'alibi' within hours of the
assassination. No one noticed the man in the photo until several months
afterward (or was it years?).
On balance I think it is a waste of time to pursue the 'alibi photo'
angle as any serious part of the investigation, just as I would
recommend not pursuing the 'driver shot JFK when no one was looking'
nonsense.
>
> Michael Dworetsky wrote in message <35A7C2F7...@star.ucl.ac.uk>...
snip discussion of why man in Altgens photo was Lovelady not LHO
In article <199807110401...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
black...@aol.com (Blackburst) wrote:
> Tino Patti wrote:
> >Can anyone tell me where I might find information are a picture that
> >is pretty good of the man that is standing in the TSD building doorway
> >after the fatal shots were fired ?.
>
> Although there is no definitive answer to this, most serious and responsible
> researchers now believe the man in the picture was not Oswald, but his
> co-worker Bill Lovelady.
>
> It is hard to point to one particular source, but if you have any faith in the
> House Committee on Assassinations, their treatment of it is pretty
> comprehesive.
>
> oo
> Dave
>
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
>actually
>came from LAW ENFORCEMENT.....
***Yes, and it was law enforcement that
informed you that Oswald said the backyard photos were fake.
If the DPD was trying to hide anything, they
wouldn't have told anyone that Oswald said
that. They would have just said later, that
they had not yet asked him about the photos
and would have done so after the transfer
to county jail on Sunday.
***Ron Judge