who sends computer viruses? ? ?

tom...@cox.net

unread,

May 18, 2013, 5:38:10 PM5/18/13

to

IN CASE McADAMS DON'T POST THIS ONE...

I never received a computer virus from mark lane....i "did" receive a
computer virus from john mCadams ! ! !see>>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick%20n%20frack.htm

John McAdams <john.m...@marquette.edu> wrote:
> On 18 May 2013 15:20:26 -0400, richard...@comcast.net wrote:
>
> >In 1967, Mark Lane methodically exposed the lies of the Warren
> >Commission Report in his book "Rush to Judgment".
> >
> >This is the film version of "Rush to Judgment":
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=Ze7_OuZpJfI&NR=1
> >
>
> Mark Lane is a sleazy character.
>
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bogus.htm#marklane
>
> .John
> --------------
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

Willy Gingersnaps

unread,

May 19, 2013, 12:31:47 AM5/19/13

to

Must be some lone nut.

tom...@cox.net

unread,

May 19, 2013, 9:03:23 PM5/19/13

to

Willy Gingersnaps <fatol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Must be some lone nut.

===========================================================================
==== CLOSE! ! !

ACTUALLY IT WAS A CRIMINAL SLEAZY LONE NUT! ! !
=====================================================================

tom...@cox.net

unread,

Jun 19, 2013, 1:31:15 AM6/19/13

to

Willy Gingersnaps <fatol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Must be some lone nut.
>
> On Saturday, May 18, 2013 5:38:10 PM UTC-4, tomnln wrote:
> > IN CASE McADAMS DON'T POST THIS ONE...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I never received a computer virus from mark lane....i "did" receive a
> >
> > computer virus from john mCadams ! ! !see>>
> >
> > http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick%20n%20frack.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > John McAdams wrote:
> >
> > > On 18 May 2013 15:20:26 -0400, richard...@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >In 1967, Mark Lane methodically exposed the lies of the Warren
> >
> > > >Commission Report in his book "Rush to Judgment".
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > >This is the film version of "Rush to Judgment":
> >
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=Ze7_OuZpJfI&NR=1
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Mark Lane is a sleazy character.

===========================================================================
== JOHN MADAMS IS A SLEAZY THIEF....HE STELS COLLEGE KIDS' MONEY BY
TEACHING THEM LIES !! ! ! !
===========================================================================
==

tims...@gmail.com

unread,

Jun 21, 2013, 9:45:27 PM6/21/13

to

STELS? STELS?!! LOL!!

Seek URGENT help, clownnln...

Very Concerned Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

tom...@cox.net

unread,

Jun 23, 2013, 9:38:17 PM6/23/13

to

IF YOU EVER GROW A SET OF BALLS LITTLE GIRL, M EET ME HERE>>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/invitation.htm

tom...@cox.net

unread,

Sep 20, 2013, 11:52:22 PM9/20/13

to

===========================================================================

GO FUCK YOURSELF ! ! !
===========================================================================

> Very Concerned Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0
> 144a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

curtj...@hotmail.com

unread,

Sep 21, 2013, 4:36:19 PM9/21/13

to

On Saturday, May 18, 2013 5:38:10 PM UTC-4, tomnln wrote:

> IN CASE McADAMS DON'T POST THIS ONE...
>
>
>
>
>
> I never received a computer virus from mark lane....i "did" receive a
>
> computer virus from john mCadams ! ! !see>>
>
> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick%20n%20frack.htm

I got like 17 Trojans when I posted a John Armstrong site. Get the free MalwareBytes. Got rid of them with one run through, and never got any problem after that.

CJ

tom...@cox.net

unread,

Sep 23, 2013, 5:27:41 PM9/23/13

to

===========================================================================
== "you're" the stupid bastaerd rob spencer...

you seem t forget that i know where you and, your family live ! ! !
tick-tock ! ! !

========================================================================

> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0
> 144a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!