IN CXASE McADAMS DON'T POST THIS ONE

[tom...@cox.net]

John McAdams <john.m...@marquette.edu> wrote:
> On 23 May 2013 20:38:48 -0400, mainframetech <mainfr...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On May 18, 3:22 pm, John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote:
> >> On 18 May 2013 15:20:26 -0400, richardchar...@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >> >In 1967, Mark Lane methodically exposed the lies of the Warren
> >> >Commission Report in his book "Rush to Judgment".
> >>
> >> >This is the film version of "Rush to Judgment":
> >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=Ze7_OuZpJfI&NR=1
> >>
> >> Mark Lane is a sleazy character.
> >>
> > And with that judgment in hand, do we have your opinion of the
> >people in the film that gave statements of what they saw that day?
> >Especially the ones that gave information that disagreed with the
> >'official' theories put out by the WC?
> >
>
> Lane uses them very selectively. For example, he interviews people
> who thought they heard shots from the GK, and has them say that they
> thought the shots came from the GK.
>
> But then he interviews Charles Brehm, and does *not* ask him from
> where the shots came.
>
> He apparently knows Brehm would say "up at the corner of Houston and
> Elm."
>
> He's acting like a lawyer, not an investigator.
>
> Of course, he entirely ignores the larger number of witnesses who
> thought the shots came from the direction of the Depository. He tells
> his viewers *nothing* about them.
>
> >
> >> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bogus.htm#marklane
> >>
===========================================================================
====
> Read the other stuff at my link, will you!
===========================================================================
==== YOUR WEBSITE SUCKS AS MUCH AS YOU DO THERE ARE NEVER ANY CITATIONS
FROM OFICIAL SOURCES.
===========================================================================
===
> .John
> --------------
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

[timstter]

On May 25, 8:15 am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote:

> > On 23 May 2013 20:38:48 -0400, mainframetech <mainframet...@yahoo.com>

WTF are you gibbering about NOW, clownnln?

About time the men in white coats were sent in, by the look of things.

Very Concerned Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

[timstter]

> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...

>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

BUMP! YOO HOO! CLOWNNLN! WTF??

TB

[timstter]

IN CXASE?! IN CXASE?!! LOL!! ABSOLUTELY CLASSIC CLOWNNLN!!!

TB

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 26, 8:07=A0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On May 25, 8:15=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote:
> > > > On 23 May 2013 20:38:48 -0400, mainframetech

> > > > <mainframet...@yahoo.com=

> >
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > >On May 18, 3:22 pm, John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu>
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> On 18 May 2013 15:20:26 -0400, richardchar...@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> > > > >> >In 1967, Mark Lane methodically exposed the lies of the Warren
> > > > >> >Commission Report in his book "Rush to Judgment".
> >
> > > > >> >This is the film version of "Rush to Judgment":

> > > > >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3Dendscreen&v=3DZe7_OuZpJf
> > > > >> >I&=
> NR=3D1

> >
> > > > >> Mark Lane is a sleazy character.
> >

> > > > > =A0And with that judgment in hand, do we have your opinion of the

> > > > >people in the film that gave statements of what they saw that day?
> > > > >Especially the ones that gave information that disagreed with the
> > > > >'official' theories put out by the WC?
> >

> > > > Lane uses them very selectively. =A0For example, he interviews

> > > > people who thought they heard shots from the GK, and has them say
> > > > that they thought the shots came from the GK.
> >
> > > > But then he interviews Charles Brehm, and does *not* ask him from
> > > > where the shots came.
> >
> > > > He apparently knows Brehm would say "up at the corner of Houston
> > > > and Elm."
> >
> > > > He's acting like a lawyer, not an investigator.
> >
> > > > Of course, he entirely ignores the larger number of witnesses who

> > > > thought the shots came from the direction of the Depository. =A0He
> > > > te=

> lls
> > > > his viewers *nothing* about them.
> >
> > > > >>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bogus.htm#marklane
> >

> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > =
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D= =3D=3D
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D> Read the other stuff at my link, will you!
> >
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > =
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D= =3D=3D
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D YOUR WEBSITE SUCKS AS MUCH AS YOU DO THERE ARE NEVER ANY
> > > C=
> ITATIONS
> > > FROM OFICIAL SOURCES.
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > =
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D= =3D=3D
> > > =3D=3D=3D

> >
> > > > .John
> > > > --------------
> > > >http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
> >
> > > --
> > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------

> > > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > > =
> =A0$9.95/Month 30GB

> >
> > WTF are you gibbering about NOW, clownnln?
> >
> > About time the men in white coats were sent in, by the look of things.
> >
> > Very Concerned Regards,
> >
> > Tim Brennan
> > Sydney, Australia
> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
> >
> > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > head...http://www.hi=

> story-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> BUMP! YOO HOO! CLOWNNLN! WTF??
>
> TB

holy shit!

deaf/dumb and blind huh ! ! !

feel>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/


i guess you're too cheap to have your own set of the 26 volumes too..

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[timstter]

> Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB

Looks like nurse/mommy has arrived to do the typing.

Carry on, clownnln.

LMFAO@U Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 27, 11:32=A0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 26, 8:07=A0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 25, 8:15=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >
> > > > John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote:
> > > > > On 23 May 2013 20:38:48 -0400, mainframetech

> > > > > <mainframet...@yahoo.c=

> om>
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >On May 18, 3:22 pm, John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu>

> > > > > >wrot=

> e:
> > > > > >> On 18 May 2013 15:20:26 -0400, richardchar...@comcast.net
> > > > > >> wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> >In 1967, Mark Lane methodically exposed the lies of the
> > > > > >> >Warren Commission Report in his book "Rush to Judgment".
> >
> > > > > >> >This is the film version of "Rush to Judgment":

> > > > > >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3Dendscreen&v=3DZe7_OuZp
> > > > > >> >Jf=
> I&NR=3D1

> >
> > > > > >> Mark Lane is a sleazy character.
> >

> > > > > > =A0And with that judgment in hand, do we have your opinion of

> > > > > >the people in the film that gave statements of what they saw
> > > > > >that day? Especially the ones that gave information that
> > > > > >disagreed with the 'official' theories put out by the WC?
> >

> > > > > Lane uses them very selectively. =A0For example, he interviews
> > > > > peop=

> le
> > > > > who thought they heard shots from the GK, and has them say that

> > > > > the=

> y
> > > > > thought the shots came from the GK.
> >
> > > > > But then he interviews Charles Brehm, and does *not* ask him from
> > > > > where the shots came.
> >
> > > > > He apparently knows Brehm would say "up at the corner of Houston

> > > > > an=

> d
> > > > > Elm."
> >
> > > > > He's acting like a lawyer, not an investigator.
> >
> > > > > Of course, he entirely ignores the larger number of witnesses who
> > > > > thought the shots came from the direction of the Depository.

> > > > > =A0He =

> tells
> > > > > his viewers *nothing* about them.
> >
> > > > > >>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bogus.htm#marklane
> >

> > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> > > > 3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D= =3D=3D

> > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D> Read the other stuff at my link, will you!

> >
> > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> > > > 3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D= =3D=3D

> > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D YOUR WEBSITE SUCKS AS MUCH AS YOU DO THERE ARE NEVER
> > > > ANY=
> CITATIONS

> > > > FROM OFICIAL SOURCES.
> > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> > > > 3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> 3D= =3D=3D
> > > > =3D=3D=3D
> >

> > > > > .John
> > > > > --------------
> > > > >http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
> >
> > > > --
> > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------

> > > > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > > > =A0 =

> =A0$9.95/Month 30GB

> >
> > > WTF are you gibbering about NOW, clownnln?
> >
> > > About time the men in white coats were sent in, by the look of
> > > things.
> >
> > > Very Concerned Regards,
> >
> > > Tim Brennan
> > > Sydney, Australia
> > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> > > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
> >
> > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > head...http://www.=

> history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > BUMP! YOO HOO! CLOWNNLN! WTF??
> >
> > TB
>
> IN CXASE?! IN CXASE?!! LOL!! ABSOLUTELY CLASSIC CLOWNNLN!!!
>
> TB

using mCadams' website makes you a "total" asshole. he's never even read
the 26 volumes. making him un eligable to even discuss the subject.

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 27, 3:58=A0pm, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On May 26, 8:07=3DA0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > On May 25, 8:15=3DA0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >
> > > > > John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote:
> > > > > > On 23 May 2013 20:38:48 -0400, mainframetech

> > > > > > <mainframet...@yahoo.com=3D

> >
> > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >On May 18, 3:22 pm, John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu>
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > >> On 18 May 2013 15:20:26 -0400, richardchar...@comcast.net

> > > > > > >> wrot=

> e:
> >
> > > > > > >> >In 1967, Mark Lane methodically exposed the lies of the

> > > > > > >> >Warre=

> n
> > > > > > >> >Commission Report in his book "Rush to Judgment".
> >
> > > > > > >> >This is the film version of "Rush to Judgment":

> > > > > > >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3D3Dendscreen&v=3D3DZe
> > > > > > >> >7_=
> OuZpJf
> > > > > > >> >I&=3D
> > > NR=3D3D1

> >
> > > > > > >> Mark Lane is a sleazy character.
> >

> > > > > > > =3DA0And with that judgment in hand, do we have your opinion
> > > > > > > of=

> the
> > > > > > >people in the film that gave statements of what they saw that

> > > > > > >da=

> y?
> > > > > > >Especially the ones that gave information that disagreed with

> > > > > > >th=

> e
> > > > > > >'official' theories put out by the WC?
> >

> > > > > > Lane uses them very selectively. =3DA0For example, he

> > > > > > interviews people who thought they heard shots from the GK, and
> > > > > > has them say that they thought the shots came from the GK.
> >
> > > > > > But then he interviews Charles Brehm, and does *not* ask him
> > > > > > from where the shots came.
> >
> > > > > > He apparently knows Brehm would say "up at the corner of
> > > > > > Houston and Elm."
> >
> > > > > > He's acting like a lawyer, not an investigator.
> >
> > > > > > Of course, he entirely ignores the larger number of witnesses
> > > > > > who thought the shots came from the direction of the

> > > > > > Depository. =3DA=
> 0He
> > > > > > te=3D

> > > lls
> > > > > > his viewers *nothing* about them.
> >
> > > > > > >>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bogus.htm#marklane
> >

> > > > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =3D
> > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
> > > D=
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
> > > 3D=3D
> > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
> > > D=
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
> > > 3D=3D =3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D> Read the other stuff at my link, will you!
> >
> > > > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =3D
> > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
> > > D=
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
> > > 3D=3D
> > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
> > > D=
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
> > > 3D=3D =3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D YOUR WEBSITE SUCKS AS MUCH AS YOU DO THERE
> > > > > ARE=
> NEVER ANY
> > > > > C=3D
> > > ITATIONS
> > > > > FROM OFICIAL SOURCES.
> > > > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =3D
> > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
> > > D=
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
> > > 3D=3D
> > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
> > > D=
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
> > > 3D=3D =3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D

> >
> > > > > > .John
> > > > > > --------------
> > > > > >http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------

> > > > > Usenet Newsgroup Service =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0
> > > > > =3DA0 =
> =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0
> > > > > =3D
> > > =3DA0$9.95/Month 30GB

> >
> > > > WTF are you gibbering about NOW, clownnln?
> >
> > > > About time the men in white coats were sent in, by the look of

> > > > things=

> .
> >
> > > > Very Concerned Regards,
> >
> > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> > > > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
> >
> > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > head...http://www.hi=3D

> > > story-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > BUMP! YOO HOO! CLOWNNLN! WTF??
> >
> > > TB
> >
> > holy shit!
> >
> > deaf/dumb and blind huh ! ! !
> >

> > feel>> =A0http://www.whokilledjfk.net/

> >
> > i guess you're too cheap to have your own set of the 26 volumes too..
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------

> > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0

> > =A0$=

> 9.95/Month 30GB
>
> Looks like nurse/mommy has arrived to do the typing.
>
> Carry on, clownnln.
>
> LMFAO@U Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0

> 14= 4a.htm

>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

wanna tell why oswaqld was housed with sewveral anti-castro organizations
at 3126 harlendale avenue in DAllAS ?

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[Jason Burke]

Well, wait. 'un eligable' is close!

[tom...@cox.net]

you're a lying criminal coward who uses a shitload of aliases ! ! !

[Jason Burke]

Nope and nope. Wrong again, Rossshit.