Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

David Von Pein's usenet postings, etc.

5 views
Skip to first unread message

arch_stanton

unread,
Feb 19, 2010, 10:22:27 AM2/19/10
to
Who composes 684 messages in one month about an event that happened 44
years back and about which there cannot be the slightest doubt? About
an event whose facts are so incontrovertible and clear that only
“nuts” and kooks” have any differing opinion? That’s 22 per day every
day (including Sundays and Holidays) for 31 days. And that’s just
usenet postings; no one will ever know how many emails were composed
or hours were spent on the phone. Or postings under other names. Or to
other forums...

Who? Why David Von Pein, of course. That was in October 2007. I
wonder what got him so excited back then; that was his highest monthly
total from 2006 to date. Of course, that wasn’t the ONLY month DVP
posted. Oh no, in fact only once since March of 2006 has he posted
fewer than 100 times in any one month. That was back in May 2006, when
he could only muster up the strength to post 111. Must have been sick
that month, or maybe he was on his honeymoon! Mostly his tally is well
over 200 newsgroup posts every month.

Well, October 2007 was his, uh, climax. (Sorry, I couldn’t help it.)
David has since calmed down somewhat, although he did get it up (Sorry
again) to 595 posts in January 2007 and 582 posts in March 2008.

In January of this year he only posted 261 times. And if he spent only
10 minutes on each one, that comes to 2,610 minutes or 43.5 HOURS.
That’s more than a week at a full time job. All to argue with a
gaggle of retards and imbeciles, nuts and kooks for whom he doesn’t
have a shred of respect and about something there isn’t the slightest
doubt about. (When is the last time any non nutter used the term
”kook”, I wonder?)

All of which prompted the following. All through the 2000s, many, MANY
people were upset - and I mean really UPSET!! - about the theft of the
2000 "election". Actually the CONSPIRACY to steal the election. I
was and remain one of them. Ditto the 2004 "election". Both of which
resulted in multiple disasters and loss of life brought about by a
president who gives mediocrity a bad name and whose acquaintance with
the truth is, shall we say, casual at best. This country and the world
will be suffering from the horrors of the Bush presidency for decades
to come and maybe more. And the disasters are ongoing; they’re not
ancient history: the ruined U.S. economy, Afghanistan, the
Constitution in tatters, institutionalized torture, etc. etc. And all
through those years, what were we told over and over again (by the
winners, natch)?

Quote on
GET OVER IT!!
Quote off

I would bet a dollar to a dime that all of our Lners, and especially
Von Pein and (need I say) McAdams et al were leading that chorus in
their respective neighborhoods.

Well, I say to Von Pein and the rest of the LN crew (I use the term
“crew” in the Mafia sense) who assert that NOTHING IMPORTANT CHANGED
AFTER 11/22/63, GET OVER IT!!

If WE should “Get Over” 2000, when everything changed, why the hell
shouldn’t you “Get Over” 1963 when nothing changed?

43 plus hours to argue about something that doesn’t matter with people
who don’t count? Von Pein, and the rest of you, GET OVER IT.


Walt

unread,
Feb 19, 2010, 10:39:29 AM2/19/10
to

aeffects

unread,
Feb 19, 2010, 10:42:19 AM2/19/10
to

thanks for the stats there, Arch. A few stats you forgot: 40 JFK
related *blogs*, book seller *book* reviews (anything WCR related),
home theater boards, YouTUBE Channel (JFK related) and of course what
got him entree here on USENET boards: old time TV shows and baseball
documentaries ALL the above which he posts to daily. Hate to burst a
bubble arch but David Von Pein is a composite. On the JFK side most
notably Dave Reitzes-pieces -- feel free to add additional aliases!

Walt

unread,
Feb 19, 2010, 10:55:58 AM2/19/10
to

Arch, Your post is good over-all, but you are way to dogmatic in your
politics. If it simplifies things for you to blame one man for the
mess, then blame Bush if it keeps your boat afloat, but I believe it's
silly to blame Bush for everything. I won't bother to make any
excuses for Bush, but I believe he did what he thought best for the
country. Personally I believe the Arab"terrorists" are the ones to
be blamed for our econonmic woes. They attacked the WTC to destroy the
world's economy which is heavily influenced by the Jews. ( their hated
eneny) The Arabs control the price of oil which is vital to our
economy and our economy started it's nose dive when the Arabs started
increasing the price of oil. If president Obama had any brains and
balls he's tell the Arabs to eat and drink their oil unless they were
willing to pay exorbitant prices for our farm products. I believe the
American people would happily tighten their belts and use far less
petroleum if Obama were to give the Arabs the middle digit.


David Von Pein

unread,
Feb 19, 2010, 11:25:00 AM2/19/10
to

>>> "David Von Pein is a composite. On the JFK side most notably Dave Reitzes-pieces -- feel free to add additional aliases!" <<<

I sure would enjoy having you (or anybody else) prove that statement,
Healy. Because I always immensely enjoy watching conspiracy theorists
trying to "prove" their stupid beliefs. And this "composite" belief of
yours is, indeed, stupid.

But, by all means, continue to believe it. It's just one additional
thing that you are 100% wrong about.

(I can hear Dave Reitzes laughing from here, too.)

BTW, I have 43 JFK-related blogs at the moment. So, you're wrong
(again). ;)


http://groups.google.com/group/reclaiming-history/browse_thread/thread/28d2b874f20d7511

http://groups.google.com/group/reclaiming-history/topics?tsc=1

David Von Pein

unread,
Feb 19, 2010, 11:53:49 AM2/19/10
to

>>> "October 2007...was his [DVP's] highest monthly total [of Usenet posts] from 2006 to date." <<<


Wrong, Mr. Statistics.

March 2007 = 786.

You kooks can't get anything right, can you? Even when it's right
under your nose.

aeffects

unread,
Feb 19, 2010, 6:02:38 PM2/19/10
to

what's a David Von Pein? ROTFLMFAO!

arch_stanton

unread,
Feb 19, 2010, 7:48:37 PM2/19/10
to

Puhleeeeeese. Tax cuts for the rich, ignoring all the warnings of an
imminent attack, lying us into a war in Iraq which had no intention or
capability of harming us while allowing bin Laden to escape, gutting
government science projects like stem cell research, attempting to
privatize social security, torture, renditions, blasting us into
unheard of debt ...what country was all that "best" for?

Personally I believe the Arab"terrorists" are the ones to
> be blamed for our econonmic woes.

That's irrational, but just to be clear, the 9/11 "terrorists" were
SAUDI. And, oh yeah, Bush made sure that all of the elite-class SAUDIs
in the country were enabled to flee the country in chartered jets
while AMERICANS were not able to fly. Before the FBI could interview
any of them. Yeah, that was just great for the country. The only
question is....which country?

They attacked the WTC to destroy the
> world's economy which is heavily influenced by the Jews.

So bin Laden thought he would destroy the world's economy just by
blowing up those two buildings? And by "the Jews", I assume you mean
the World Bank, IMF, the central banks of Europe, Japan and China,
outfits like Exxon-Mobil, Citicorp, and all of Wall Street? Anyhow, I
thought 9/11 was an attack against the U.S. not the world economy. How
do you know this?

( their hated enemy)

Well, yes and no. They also hate the U.S. for its pro-Israel anti-
Palestinian policies, and the Saudi regime for its corruption and non-
religiosity.

the Arabs control the price of oil

And the oil companies are the helpless victims of the Arabs? I seem to
recall Exxon-Mobil made the most profit of any corporation IN HISTORY
recently.

which is vital to our
> economy and our economy started it's nose dive when the Arabs started
> increasing the price of oil.

If president Obama had any brains and
> balls he's tell the Arabs to eat and drink their oil unless they were
> willing to pay exorbitant prices for our farm products.

Obama's brains and balls aren't the issue. He works for the energy
conglomerates and corporate elites. He's doing what they want him to.
Why should they tell him to bust Saudi Arabia's balls? Learn about the
Bush family ties to the Saudis, for example. And how do you know the
Saudis aren't part owners of our farm industry to begin with?
Monsanto, Libby, Armour etc. What do you think they do with their oil
revenue, stash it in a giant vault like Scrooge McDuck?


I believe the > American people would happily tighten their belts
and use far less
> petroleum if Obama were to give the Arabs the middle digit.

You're out of touch with reality. The rivalry is all in the
newspapers. Arabs, Americans, Chinese, Japanese, Europe, South
America....at the corporate level, they all sit on each others boards.
James Baker, former Secretary of State, mastermind of Bush 43s
victory, senior partner of Baker-Botts represents the Saudis for
heaven's sake!

Open your eyes. It ain't "the Jews". And Obama is doing his job. Well.

And finally, if the 9/11 hijackers didn't have vital and deliberate
help from within the US government, I'll eat my hat. Not one person,
from that day to this has been demoted, court-martialled, fired,
reprimanded, transferred, or otherwise disciplined in any way. What
message does that send you?

Walt

unread,
Feb 19, 2010, 8:11:18 PM2/19/10
to

Wow!!...... You really are filled with hate aren't you? Who is
harmed because of your hatred?


- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

0 new messages