FOR MARSH AGAIN
tomnln
MIDDLE POST;
"Anthony Marsh" <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:GaGdnVaH7LoOKDTV...@comcast.com...
> tomnln wrote:
>>
>> "Anthony Marsh" <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:frSdnbYRndPfFDXV...@comcast.com...
>>> tomnln wrote:
>>>> "Anthony Marsh" <anthon...@comcast.net
>>>> <mailto:anthon...@comcast.net>> wrote in message
>>>> news:W-mdnaX5281dQjjV...@comcast.com...
>>>> > David Von Pein wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>>>> ""Wide open"? My my how you like to embellish descriptions I
>>>> never used those words. The descriptions of the witnesses have the
>>>> wound being, as far as I can recall, from as small as quarter size to
>>>> as large as a small orange." <<<
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Yeah, that's why McClelland drew this absurd drawing, huh?:
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Marsh wrote;
>>>>
>>>> > How many times do you have to be told? Pay attention this time.
>>>> > McClelland did not draw that.
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head2.gif
>>>> I write;
>>>>
>>>> Not only did he draw that picture....
>>>>
>>>> He wrote so ON the picture & Signed the picture
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Marsh wrote;
>>
>>> Pay attention. He said that drawing is LIKE the one he had made
>>> previously. In the Men Who Killed Kennedy he agreed with the WC
>>> drawing which shows the wound on the side of the head.
>>
>>
>>
>> I write;
>>
>> Read it & WEEP Marsh;
>> He wrote;
>>
>> "Bud, the drawing below is an exact copy in regard to location and
>> dimensions of the drawing, I made for Josiah Thompson in 1966.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marsh wrote;
> Then show me the drawing he made for Josiah Thompson in 1966. It ain't the
> one published, which was my point. The published a more artistic COPY.
> Understand the word COPY? Not the original.
I write;
Marsh has trouble understanding the words "EXACT COPY"
see>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
I've added the "Original" from Josiah Thompson's book "Six Seconds In
Dallas" page 107.
CHOKE on it Marsh.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Signed "Best wishes, Robert N. McClelland
>>
>> HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>>
>> Several other Marsh Screw-Ups are also on that page further down.
>>
>> Your Apologies for the WCR Lies are STILL Failing.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>>> >> Looks like a family of 6 could reside inside that enormous hole
>>>> drawn
>>>> >> by McClelland.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > It was not drawn by McClelland. It was drawn by a conspiracy
>>>> researcher.
>>>> > McClelland agreed in general with the WC drawing showing the wound
>>>> on
>>>> > the right side of the head.
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.paulseaton.com/jfk/boh/beth/piks/rydberg.jpg
>>>> >
>>>> >> But, somehow, only a teeny-weeny section of the SCALP was torn or
>>>> >> ripped in order for McClelland (et al) to see something akin to the
>>>> >> above. Right, John?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> One word:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> How?
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>
>>
>
tomnln
Tell us exactly which drawing by McClelland you Disagree with?
The "Original" you referered to in Thompson's book?
ORRRRRRRRRRRRR,
The "EXACT COPY" I originally posted with McClelland's writing on it?
Seen HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
You've Failed Again to save the Lies of the Warren Commission.
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:27rqk.37138$QX3....@newsfe02.iad...
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, I couldn't help noticing on your Catch Of The Day page that you
still claim I described the second type of flower on the limo seat as
a *white* flower, tomnln.
I already corrected you before that I described it as a *purplish/
whitish flower*, tomnln.
Are you claiming that I didn't say *purplish/whitish flower* in my
original post, tomnln? Or are you simply unable to fix your website
once you have put something up?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Aug 20, 5:07 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> HEY MARSH;
>
> Tell us exactly which drawing by McClelland you Disagree with?
>
> The "Original" you referered to in Thompson's book?
> ORRRRRRRRRRRRR,
> The "EXACT COPY" I originally posted with McClelland's writing on it?
>
> Seen HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>
> You've Failed Again to save the Lies of the Warren Commission.
>
> "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
>
> news:27rqk.37138$QX3....@newsfe02.iad...
>
>
>
> > In case McAdams don't post this one.
>
> > MIDDLE POST;
>
> > "Anthony Marsh" <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >news:GaGdnVaH7LoOKDTV...@comcast.com...
> >> tomnln wrote:
>
> >>> "Anthony Marsh" <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:frSdnbYRndPfFDXV...@comcast.com...
> >>>> tomnln wrote:
> >>>>> "Anthony Marsh" <anthony_ma...@comcast.net
> >>>>> <mailto:anthony_ma...@comcast.net>> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:W-mdnaX5281dQjjV...@comcast.com...
> >>>>> > David Von Pein wrote:
>
> >>>>> >>>>> ""Wide open"? My my how you like to embellish descriptions I
> >>>>> never used those words. The descriptions of the witnesses have the
> >>>>> wound being, as far as I can recall, from as small as quarter size to
> >>>>> as large as a small orange." <<<
>
> >>>>> >> Yeah, that's why McClelland drew this absurd drawing, huh?:
> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >>>>> Marsh wrote;
>
> >>>>> > How many times do you have to be told? Pay attention this time.
> >>>>> > McClelland did not draw that.
>
> >>>>> >>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head2.gif
> >>>>> I write;
>
> >>>>> Not only did he draw that picture....
>
> >>>>> He wrote so ON the picture & Signed the picture
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Marsh wrote;
>
> >>>> Pay attention. He said that drawing is LIKE the one he had made
> >>>> previously. In the Men Who Killed Kennedy he agreed with the WC
> >>>> drawing which shows the wound on the side of the head.
>
> >>> I write;
>
> >>> Read it & WEEP Marsh;
> >>> He wrote;
>
> >>> "Bud, the drawing below is an exact copy in regard to location and
> >>> dimensions of the drawing, I made for Josiah Thompson in 1966.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Marsh wrote;
>
> >> Then show me the drawing he made for Josiah Thompson in 1966. It ain't
> >> the
> >> one published, which was my point. The published a more artistic COPY.
> >> Understand the word COPY? Not the original.
>
> > I write;
>
> > Marsh has trouble understanding the words "EXACT COPY"
>
> > see>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>
> > I've added the "Original" from Josiah Thompson's book "Six Seconds In
> > Dallas" page 107.
>
> > CHOKE on it Marsh.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >>> Signed "Best wishes, Robert N. McClelland
>
> >>> HERE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>
> >>> Several other Marsh Screw-Ups are also on that page further down.
>
> >>> Your Apologies for the WCR Lies are STILL Failing.
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >>>>> >> Looks like a family of 6 could reside inside that enormous hole
> >>>>> drawn
> >>>>> >> by McClelland.
>
> >>>>> > It was not drawn by McClelland. It was drawn by a conspiracy
> >>>>> researcher.
> >>>>> > McClelland agreed in general with the WC drawing showing the wound
> >>>>> on
> >>>>> > the right side of the head.
>
> >>>>> >http://www.paulseaton.com/jfk/boh/beth/piks/rydberg.jpg
>
> >>>>> >> But, somehow, only a teeny-weeny section of the SCALP was torn or
> >>>>> >> ripped in order for McClelland (et al) to see something akin to
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> >> above. Right, John?
>
> >>>>> >> One word:
>
> >>>>> >> How?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
tomnln
The thread was about the object described as looking like a Doggie that Jean
Hill SAW.
What are you gonna do Next?
Demand to know exactly what time the photos were taken?
You don't know any more abour the Doggie tjhan you know about the Oswald
"Impesdonator" in Mexico City.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
The only way a WCR Supporter is to REJECT the evidence/testimony in the 26
volumes
And, You're STUCK with it.
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:22ed3859-7a21-4728...@a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
Chuck Schuyler
>
> > >>>>> Marsh wrote;
>
> > >>>>> > How many times do you have to be told? Pay attention this time.
> > >>>>> > McClelland did not draw that.
>
> > >>>>> >>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head2.gif
> > >>>>> I write;
>
> > >>>>> Not only did he draw that picture....
>
> > >>>>> He wrote so ON the picture & Signed the picture
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> Marsh wrote;
>
> > >>>> Pay attention. He said that drawing is LIKE the one he had made
> > >>>> previously. In the Men Who Killed Kennedy he agreed with the WC
> > >>>> drawing which shows the wound on the side of the head.
>
> > >>> I write;
>
> > >>> Read it & WEEP Marsh;
> > >>> He wrote;
>
> > >>> "Bud, the drawing below is an exact copy in regard to location and
> > >>> dimensions of the drawing, I made for Josiah Thompson in 1966.
>
> - Show quoted text -
He can't fix things once they're up at his site, Tim. He's commented
on that before. Being confined to a colostomy bag burdened wheelchair
with a bad tire between visits to the local dialysis center, Tom
relies on one of his nephews he periodically molests to come over and
diddle around with his sh*tty website.
At most, Tom has a few months left before the inoperable tumor on his
neck finally shuts off his air supply and mercifully spares us his
analysis of the Kennedy assassination-which Tom feels was perpetrated
by everyone except Oswald.
Brilliant, Tom.
tomnln
"Chuck Schuyler" <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote in message
news:32f23cf6-32c3-41df...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Brilliant, Tom.
To protect the Lies of the WCR Chuckie must REJECT the evidence/testimony.
To clean my clostomy bag I use chuckie's wife's Syphoning Professional
virtues.
http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
Chuck Schuyler
> To clean my clostomy bag I use chuckie's wife's Syphoning Professional
> virtues.
While I know my wife would have nothing to do with you, it's nice to
see you finally admit that you wear a colsotmy bag.
tomnln
Only to attract that Sicko wife of yours.
Wanna see a picture of her after I've Used her???
Chuck Schuyler
How 'bout posting a picture of you in your wheelchair with your
colostomy bag and neck tumor. Reading Rush to Judgment.
tomnln
I have just such a picture chuckie.
The trouble with it is that you can't see me at, all due to your
wife's"Gigantic Ass" blocking view while she Eats "The BIG"One.
RUN you little dicky-licker>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
I don't know anything about a <snicker> Oswald *Impesdonator* in
Mexico City, tomnln, because there is no such things as an Oswald
*Impesdonator* in Mexico City or anywhere else, for that matter.
BTW, your website STILL says *white flower* when I clearly posted
*purplish/whitish flower*, tomnln.
Once you make a blue on your website you can't fix it, can you?
LOL! Do you REALLY believe anyone is going to read that cobbled
together mess and reach a conclusion about anything?
Amused Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Aug 20, 8:36 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> You keep Dodging the Issue Timmy.
>
> The thread was about the object described as looking like a Doggie that Jean
> Hill SAW.
>
> What are you gonna do Next?
>
> Demand to know exactly what time the photos were taken?
>
> You don't know any more abour the Doggie tjhan you know about the Oswald
> "Impesdonator" in Mexico City.
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>
> The only way a WCR Supporter is to REJECT the evidence/testimony in the 26
> volumes
>
> And, You're STUCK with it.
>
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > >>>>> Marsh wrote;
>
> > >>>>> > How many times do you have to be told? Pay attention this time.
> > >>>>> > McClelland did not draw that.
>
> > >>>>> >>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head2.gif
> > >>>>> I write;
>
> > >>>>> Not only did he draw that picture....
>
> > >>>>> He wrote so ON the picture & Signed the picture
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> Marsh wrote;
>
> > >>>> Pay attention. He said that drawing is LIKE the one he had made
> > >>>> previously. In the Men Who Killed Kennedy he agreed with the WC
> > >>>> drawing which shows the wound on the side of the head.
>
> > >>> I write;
>
> > >>> Read it & WEEP Marsh;
> > >>> He wrote;
>
> > >>> "Bud, the drawing below is an exact copy in regard to location and
> > >>> dimensions of the drawing, I made for Josiah Thompson in 1966.
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Chuck,
I had wondered why tomnln couldn't correct his <snicker> *website*.
The online lies are starting to accumulate for ol' tomnln.
Hey, tomnln, if your (sic) out there in cyberland, why does your, er,
*website* go against evidence/testimony, tomnln?
Evidence/testimony, as in the 26 volumes, tomnln?
You wouldn't go against the evidence/testimony, would you tomnln?
Not the, the ol', that there, th' (reverential bow of the head ALA
Grizzlie) *evidence/testimony*, tomnln! Not the ol' (reverential bow
of the head ALA Grizzlie) *evidence/testimony*??
Oh dear...
Disillusioned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> > > >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > > >>>>> Marsh wrote;
>
> > > >>>>> > How many times do you have to be told? Pay attention this time.
> > > >>>>> > McClelland did not draw that.
>
> > > >>>>> >>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head2.gif
> > > >>>>> I write;
>
> > > >>>>> Not only did he draw that picture....
>
> > > >>>>> He wrote so ON the picture & Signed the picture
> > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> Marsh wrote;
>
> > > >>>> Pay attention. He said that drawing is LIKE the one he had made
> > > >>>> previously. In the Men Who Killed Kennedy he agreed with the WC
> > > >>>> drawing which shows the wound on the side of the head.
>
> > > >>> I write;
>
> > > >>> Read it & WEEP Marsh;
> > > >>> He wrote;
>
> > > >>> "Bud, the drawing below is an exact copy in regard to location and
> > > >>> dimensions of the drawing, I made for Josiah Thompson in 1966.
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Marsh wrote;
>
> > > >> Then show me the drawing he made for Josiah Thompson in 1966. It ain't
> > > >> the
> > > >> one published, which was my point. The published a more artistic COPY.
> > > >> Understand the word COPY? Not the original.
>
> > > > I write;
>
> > > > Marsh has trouble understanding the words "EXACT COPY"
>
> > > > see>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>
> > > > I've added the "Original" from Josiah Thompson's book "Six Seconds In
> > > > Dallas" page 107.
>
> > > > CHOKE on it Marsh.
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Brilliant, Tom.- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d5894568-30a6-4385...@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
I don't know anything about a <snicker> Oswald *Impesdonator* in
Mexico City, tomnln, because there is no such things as an Oswald
*Impesdonator* in Mexico City or anywhere else, for that matter.
BTW, your website STILL says *white flower* when I clearly posted
*purplish/whitish flower*, tomnln.
Once you make a blue on your website you can't fix it, can you?
LOL! Do you REALLY believe anyone is going to read that cobbled
together mess and reach a conclusion about anything?
Amused Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It also contains your belief that Oswald was.....
5 ft. 3 inches tall
Blond Haired
119 pounds.
ps;
NO, I don't think people like You/Yours would read any Official
evidence/testimony taken from YOUR 26 volumes.
You continue to RUN from these official Records>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a005495-f7f3-4613...@k36g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi Chuck,
I had wondered why tomnln couldn't correct his <snicker> *website*.
The online lies are starting to accumulate for ol' tomnln.
Hey, tomnln, if your (sic) out there in cyberland, why does your, er,
*website* go against evidence/testimony, tomnln?
Evidence/testimony, as in the 26 volumes, tomnln?
You wouldn't go against the evidence/testimony, would you tomnln?
Not the, the ol', that there, th' (reverential bow of the head ALA
Grizzlie) *evidence/testimony*, tomnln! Not the ol' (reverential bow
of the head ALA Grizzlie) *evidence/testimony*??
Oh dear...
Disillusioned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Timmy;
That "evidence tampering" scares ALL of you LN's.
http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
Do you condone Felonies Timmy?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------