A Sincere Question For David Healy II
Todd W. Vaughan
In a thead titled "A Sincere Question For David Healy", you stated:
QUOTE ON:
Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963, I
honestly believe you, nor anyone else in the entire world can
positively ID Abraham Zapruder, based in those very films-photos, as
the person standing on the pedestal in Dealey Plaza...
QUOTE OFF
I then asked:
QUOTE ON:
Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963, can
you or anyone else in the entire world, positively ID any of the
following
people, based in those very films-photos, as being present in Dealey
Plaza at
the time of the assassination:
Oriville Nix
Marie Muchmore
Charles Bronson
Phil Willis
Hugh Betzner
Elsie Dorman
Jay Skaggs
Wilma Bond
Jim Towner
Tina Towner
James Altgens
Richard Bothun
QUOTE OFF
Are you going to answer me, or is that too tough a question for the
self-proclaimed expert on DP photography?
Todd
tomnln
http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0868e3e7-bd0a-44cf...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
aeffects
> David,
>
> In a thead titled "A Sincere Question For David Healy", you stated:
>
> QUOTE ON:
>
> Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963, I
> honestly believe you, nor anyone else in the entire world can
> positively ID Abraham Zapruder, based in those very films-photos, as
> the person standing on the pedestal in Dealey Plaza...
>
> QUOTE OFF
>
> I then asked:
shuck and jive son.... we're attempting to ID Zapruder, the alleged
guy standing on the pedestal, give me/us a positive ID based on ANY
picture of film shot/taken in Dealey Plaza that day. You CAN'T, simple
as that... (called foundation, Todd) as a daBug adherent you know
where to go to get the definition
> QUOTE ON:
>
> Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963, can
> you or anyone else in the entire world, positively ID any of the
> following
> people, based in those very films-photos, as being present in Dealey
> Plaza at
> the time of the assassination:
>
> Oriville Nix
> Marie Muchmore
> Charles Bronson
> Phil Willis
> Hugh Betzner
> Elsie Dorman
> Jay Skaggs
> Wilma Bond
> Jim Towner
> Tina Towner
> James Altgens
> Richard Bothun
>
> QUOTE OFF
>
> Are you going to answer me, or is that too tough a question for the
> self-proclaimed expert on DP photography?
Me, self-proclaimed expert on DP photography? That's your venue son, I
*know* the Zapruder film and I can't ID him in any of these other
films - photos, Gary Mack can't do it either, ASK him (you need his
number?)... how about you convincing me and the lurkers, you can --
simple as that, guy.
> Todd
muc...@gmail.com
School must have been a living Hell, but can you at least try to
provide a straight answer to the following question:
What is two plus two?
Todd W. Vaughan
Nope, you claimed you forgot more that I ever knew on DP photography.
So, impress us with your vast knowledge.
>I
> *know* the Zapruder film and I can't ID him in any of these other
> films - photos, Gary Mack can't do it either, ASK him (you need his
> number?)... how about you convincing me and the lurkers, you can --
> simple as that, guy.
>
>
David, David, David,
Have you ever in your life just addressed something in a straight-
forward manner? Was it this bad 'rouind the old Healy dinner table?
Healy Mom: "So David, what did you do at school today?"
Healy Son David: "How do you know I even went to school? Can you prove
it?"
Why all of the bullshit all of the time, David?
My point, one that you surely MUST have understood but certainly did
not address, is that there were scores of photographers in Dealey
Plaza who were there and who took photos and films, yet many of whom
we are not able to positively identify as being those persons via the
films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza.
If we are to then use sick, twisted type of "logic", their identities
and claims that they were there and took their photos and films must
be questioned. Perhaps all of their photos and films were altered.
Perhaps they were invovled inthe conspiracy itself.
Sorry, life doesn't work that way, David, except in Kookland.
Healy Dad: "Could you please pass the potatoes, David?
Healy Son David: "How do you know they're potatoes?
Todd
positively ID any of the
> > following
> > people, based in those very films-photos, as being present in Dealey
> > Plaza at
> > the time of the assassination:
>
> > Todd- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
tomnln
ALL in his own words.
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2c4e12c8-a69a-4a33...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
Todd W. Vaughan
> WHO is toad vaughan?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> ALL in his own words.
Who is Ellen, Tom?
>
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:2c4e12c8-a69a-4a33...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
On Mar 16, 9:12 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> WHO is toad vaughan?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> ALL in his own words.
Who is Ellen, Tom?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone NOT afraid of evidence/testimony.
I heard you married a Priest toad.
STILL Runnin from evidence/testimony Loser?>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
Nobody can blame you after the way I Stuffed it up your ass with Lee J.
Bowers>>>
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
Hi David,
Say, didn't this guy, Abraham Zapruder, wander in to WFAA TV the same
day he made his film and recount his story about filming the
assassination on air with some guy called Jay Watson?
Didn't he then get tracked down by LIFE magazine the same evening, and
the next morning show his film to the Secret Service and a LIFE
representative, before selling the film to LIFE for a huge sum?
Didn't this guy sell dresses? He must have been a very brave little
tailor to go out and scam the USSS and LIFE so brazenly so shortly
after the assassination, eh?
Your whole take on things is absurd, Healy. And you still run from any
specific discussion of Holmes's Z 369 nonsense.
Now why is that, Toots-E-Roll?
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Bud
I recently sprung this poser on Walt... "If a bus takes 10 minutes
to complete a third of it`s journey, how long would it take to
complete the trip?" His answer, predictably, was "Nebraska".
aeffects
> TOP POST
>
> Hi David,
>
> Say, didn't this guy, Abraham Zapruder, wander in to WFAA TV the same
> day he made his film and recount his story about filming the
> assassination on air with some guy called Jay Watson?
brennan, you actually trolled a jfk assassination website someplace --
wonderful. Now what the fuck does that have to do with positively
ID'ing old Abe based on the films and photos of Dealey Plaza standing
and filming from that north pedestal? Hell even a moron like Sammy
from down-undah can undertand a simple concept....
<where'd they find this .john shill? snip the obvious>
tims...@gmail.com
Actually, just warming to my theme here Toots-E-Roll, this guy
Zapruder would have to have been SCAMMING THE WHOLE WORLD the morning
of 23 November, 1963, if we are to believe your stupid and unsupported
theories of Z film alteration.
It's entirely implausible, just like it is entirely implausible that
you have a B/W *galley proof* copy of the book Four Days, Toots-E-
Roll.
Do you routinely lie to support your friend Ben Holmes, Toots-E-Roll?
It would appear so, wouldn't it.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
justm...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Healy is trying to follow the footsteps of his mentor Holmes. As with
Holmes 45 questions that he claims no one can answer without giving a
response that points to conspiracy, Healy tried the same technique
with his Zapruder can't be identified theory. The difference between
Holmes games and Healys is that Healy being the moron he is, puts up a
fight over something that is one of the most ridiculous claims ever
made. Healy is the ONLY one that has ever brought up this theory.
(surprised huh?) The only place Healy has made this foolish comment
is on this group. He probably figures he'll have the support of the
other Stooges and the lead liar Holmes. He knows that if he ever
posted this stupidity on the Education forum he would be laughed out
the door like he has been many times before.
It's not bad enough he claims to have everything in his power to show
that the film was altered, he claims that Zapruder was an imposter
because there are no pictures of him standing on the platform filming
the motorcade.
Now, anyone with half a brain would ask....why would someone bother
taking a picture of Zapruder, when they were all there to see the
President? LMAO...only in the delusional mind of Healy can this
question be answered.
Healys claim is right up there with Chicos now....
Zapruder is a fake
JFK was coughing up a bullet
Nellie or John Connally shot Kennedy.
And the beat goes on.........................
aeffects
> Zapruder would have to have been SCAMMING THE WHOLE WORLD the morning
> of 23 November, 1963, if we are to believe your stupid and unsupported
> theories of Z film alteration.
obviously you haven't read The Great Zapruder Film HOAX.... now are
YOU credible enough to comment on same? Show the Lurkers your Lone Nut
credentials, son!
> It's entirely implausible, just like it is entirely implausible that
> you have a B/W *galley proof* copy of the book Four Days, Toots-E-
> Roll.
son, you haven't the money to find out -- you're just another Lone Nut
troll working off defaulted student loan debt, no place to run - no
place to hide....
> Do you routinely lie to support your friend Ben Holmes, Toots-E-Roll?
> It would appear so, wouldn't it.
You've been shown to be a coward, toots-e-roll.... keep coming back,
we'll make a man outt'a you yet!
Toots-e-roll, doesn't that *handle* look nice in print.... I've found
so many trolls here the term fits.....
Seeya.....
<snip>
Ben Holmes
aeffects says...
>
>On Mar 19, 4:17 am, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>> TOP POST
>>
>> Actually, just warming to my theme here Toots-E-Roll, this guy
>> Zapruder would have to have been SCAMMING THE WHOLE WORLD the morning
>> of 23 November, 1963, if we are to believe your stupid and unsupported
>> theories of Z film alteration.
How silly! You can't even believe what Zapruder says about his filming, yet you
imply that you do.
>obviously you haven't read The Great Zapruder Film HOAX.... now are
>YOU credible enough to comment on same? Show the Lurkers your Lone Nut
>credentials, son!
He probably doesn't even own the book. He seems quite ignorant of alteration
evidence.
>> It's entirely implausible, just like it is entirely implausible that
>> you have a B/W *galley proof* copy of the book Four Days, Toots-E-
>> Roll.
>
>son, you haven't the money to find out -- you're just another Lone Nut
>troll working off defaulted student loan debt, no place to run - no
>place to hide....
>
>
>> Do you routinely lie to support your friend Ben Holmes, Toots-E-Roll?
That's strange... how would someone asserting that a book is in B/W support me,
when I *never* stated that? Indeed, *my* copy has the photo in color.
If David is "supporting" me, he's doing a strange job of it by contradicting me.
justm...@gmail.com
> In article <503d46ae-f710-4566-9c6c-d266e03c6...@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Took you long enough to see what a confused idiot your lapdog is
Holmes. He was lying for you...defending you. It's about the only
defense you get....from a drug infested junkie. Enjoy!
muc...@gmail.com
> In article <503d46ae-f710-4566-9c6c-d266e03c6...@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> aeffects says...
>
> >On Mar 19, 4:17 am, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> TOP POST
>
> >> Actually, just warming to my theme here Toots-E-Roll, this guy
> >> Zapruder would have to have been SCAMMING THE WHOLE WORLD the morning
> >> of 23 November, 1963, if we are to believe your stupid and unsupported
> >> theories of Z film alteration.
>
> How silly! You can't even believe what Zapruder says about his filming, yet you
> imply that you do.
You believe that discrepancies between Zapruder's testimony and what
the film shows are evidence of alteration, don't you? How silly!
> >obviously you haven't read The Great Zapruder Film HOAX.... now are
> >YOU credible enough to comment on same? Show the Lurkers your Lone Nut
> >credentials, son!
>
> He probably doesn't even own the book. He seems quite ignorant of alteration
> evidence.
Like the lady wearing yellow pants?
ROTFLMAO!!!
> >> It's entirely implausible, just like it is entirely implausible that
> >> you have a B/W *galley proof* copy of the book Four Days, Toots-E-
> >> Roll.
>
> >son, you haven't the money to find out -- you're just another Lone Nut
> >troll working off defaulted student loan debt, no place to run - no
> >place to hide....
>
> >> Do you routinely lie to support your friend Ben Holmes, Toots-E-Roll?
>
> That's strange... how would someone asserting that a book is in B/W support me,
> when I *never* stated that? Indeed, *my* copy has the photo in color.
He was indeed trying to support you - by sabotaging a thread
requesting you to identify a certain lady, wearing yellow pants, upon
whom you were basing a silly alteration claim. When Tim chimed in with
a reference to a Nix frame reproduced in a certain book, your lapdog
attacked him by falsely claiming that the book is in b&w. The sort of
thing disinfo artists do when they want to avoid scrutiny and honest
discussion: attack those who attempt to clarify the issue.
> If David is "supporting" me, he's doing a strange job of it by contradicting me.
Yet he seems to be the only "support" you have.
How embarrasing.
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Mark,
It would be hard to put it better than that, concerning Healy's lying
antics in support of Holmes and his stupid *Yellow Legs* proves Z film
alteration argument.
One thing I've noticed is that both Healy and Holmes don't want to
discuss specifics of their theory any more. And here's why:
Holmes and Healy have both been asked how many light posts there were
in the Main Street stretch of Dealey Plaza, but they won't reply.
Reason is it shows *how silly* Holmes was to come up with his
alteration nonsense in the first place. And *how silly* Healy was to
agree with it.
There are four light posts, evenly spaced, in the Main Street stretch
of Dealey Plaza. The first is near the peristyles and reflecting
pools, the second and third are on the grass and the fourth is right
at the end of the grass, where the road goes under the underpass.
Nix was standing on the corner of Main and Houston when he was
filming. As his camera pans from right to left, following the car, it
picks up light post # 2 in the foreground. As it continues to pan left
it picks up *Yellow Legs* but never pans left enough to pick up light
post # 3.
Now when Zapruder is filming, at around Z 369, when the Franzen group
is in view, a light post can be seen in the background, and shortly
after Main Street beyond it. For Holmes' theory to work, this would
have to be light post # 2 but it isn't! It is light post # 3, the one
that Nix's camera never panned far across enough to film in the
assassination sequence.
You can tell it is light post # 3 as light post # 4 comes into view as
Zapruder continues to pan right and the car goes under the underpass.
Nix and Zapruder never filmed the same section of grass, where *Yellow
Legs* was standing, because Zapruder's camera never panned that far
back. This can be shown with some of the links you have provided, if
anyone is interested.
If Ben had applied simple logic he would have seen there was a logical
explanation for why *Yellow Legs* was in Nix but not in Zapruder, but
he didn't. He chose Z film alteration as an explanation. I wonder if
we'll hear any more from Ben on this matter. I doubt it.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
justm...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
You probably won't hear from Holmes, cause he's probably busy training
the lapdog to come in growling on his behalf with another stream of
gibberish no one understands or cares about. Apparently Holmes is too
stuid to see that Healy makes him look like even more of an ass when
he tries to defend his master. It's actually comical to
watch...reminds me of Laurel and Hardy LOL
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Just,
Probably you're right, LOL!
Still, if Ben does want to turn up with his mate, Healy, here are some
useful on-line tools provided by Mark the other day that show just how
wrong their theory is:
[Nix frames] If people click through the next button for a page or so
they will see light post # 2 come into view, and eventually *Yellow
Legs*:
http://jfk.fotopic.net/c1178748.html
[Zapruder frames] If people click on Z 369 here they will see light
post # 3 in the background, as well as Main Street:
http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/
It's quite obvious in the Nix film that the expanse of grass that Nix
is filming across is far too wide to all be shown in Zapruder. It's in
that expanse of grass, between light post # 2 and light post # 3 that
*Yellow Legs* is standing.
Harris, Mark, Burly and the others were right all along. Benny & The
Vet were wrong, LOL!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Mar 22, 11:18 am, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> watch...reminds me of Laurel and Hardy LOL- Hide quoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim, tomnln, then
why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/testimony in the
form of CE2121, tomnln?
To whit, tomnln, your website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified
Oswald as the person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,
1963, when Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23
November, 1963.
And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on the matter,
tomnln. Duran confirmed, straight up, on November 23, that Oswald WAS
the guy she met in September 1963.
Oh, I get it tomnln. You don't FEAR evidence/testimony, you simply
IGNORE evidence/testimony. Is that right, tomnln?
It would certainly appear to be the case, tomnln.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Mar 17, 2:13 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:bb7952bb-1f3b-44ce...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 16, 9:12 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > WHO is toad vaughan?>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > ALL in his own words.
>
> Who is Ellen, Tom?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Someone NOT afraid of evidence/testimony.
>
> I heard you married a Priest toad.
>
> STILL Runnin from evidence/testimony Loser?>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> Nobody can blame you after the way I Stuffed it up your ass with Lee J.
> Bowers>>>
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:21e43746-70c5-4711...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim, tomnln, then
why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/testimony in the
form of CE2121, tomnln?
To whit, tomnln, your website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified
Oswald as the person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,
1963, when Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23
November, 1963.
And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on the matter,
tomnln. Duran confirmed, straight up, on November 23, that Oswald WAS
the guy she met in September 1963.
Oh, I get it tomnln. You don't FEAR evidence/testimony, you simply
IGNORE evidence/testimony. Is that right, tomnln?
It would certainly appear to be the case, tomnln.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Here Ya go AGAIN Timmy;
http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd W. Vaughan
Tom,
Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
Tim brought up about your web-site?
Todd
On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:21e43746-70c5-4711...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim, tomnln, then
> why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/testimony in the
> form of CE2121, tomnln?
>
> To whit, tomnln, your website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified
> Oswald as the person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,
> 1963, when Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23
> November, 1963.
>
> And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on the matter,
> tomnln. Duran confirmed, straight up, on November 23, that Oswald WAS
> the guy she met in September 1963.
>
> Oh, I get it tomnln. You don't FEAR evidence/testimony, you simply
> IGNORE evidence/testimony. Is that right, tomnln?
>
> It would certainly appear to be the case, tomnln.
>
> Concerned Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> Here Ya go AGAIN Timmy;
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
Tom,
Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
Tim brought up about your web-site?
Todd
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
Based on>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:21e43746-70c5-4711...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim, tomnln, then
> why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/testimony in the
> form of CE2121, tomnln?
>
> To whit, tomnln, your website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified
> Oswald as the person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,
> 1963, when Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23
> November, 1963.
>
> And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on the matter,
> tomnln. Duran confirmed, straight up, on November 23, that Oswald WAS
> the guy she met in September 1963.
>
> Oh, I get it tomnln. You don't FEAR evidence/testimony, you simply
> IGNORE evidence/testimony. Is that right, tomnln?
>
> It would certainly appear to be the case, tomnln.
>
> Concerned Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> Here Ya go AGAIN Timmy;
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------н-----------------------------------------
>
> On Mar 17, 2:13 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:bb7952bb-1f3b-44ce...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 16, 9:12 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > WHO is toad vaughan?>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > > ALL in his own words.
>
> > Who is Ellen, Tom?
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------нн------------------------------------------
>
> > Someone NOT afraid of evidence/testimony.
>
> > I heard you married a Priest toad.
>
> > STILL Runnin from evidence/testimony Loser?>>>
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> > Nobody can blame you after the way I Stuffed it up your ass with Lee J.
> > Bowers>>>
>
> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------нн-------------------------------------------
Todd W. Vaughan
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:7d63d8d0-91ce-4c80...@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Tom,
>
> Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> Todd
> I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> Based on>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
Tom,
Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
Tim brought up about your web-site?
Todd
>
> On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:21e43746-70c5-4711...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> > TOP POST
>
> > Hi tomnln,
>
> > Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim, tomnln, then
> > why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/testimony in the
> > form of CE2121, tomnln?
>
> > To whit, tomnln, your website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified
> > Oswald as the person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,
> > 1963, when Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23
> > November, 1963.
>
> > And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on the matter,
> > tomnln. Duran confirmed, straight up, on November 23, that Oswald WAS
> > the guy she met in September 1963.
>
> > Oh, I get it tomnln. You don't FEAR evidence/testimony, you simply
> > IGNORE evidence/testimony. Is that right, tomnln?
>
> > It would certainly appear to be the case, tomnln.
>
> > Concerned Regards,
>
> > Tim Brennan
> > Sydney, Australia
> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> > Here Ya go AGAIN Timmy;
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > On Mar 17, 2:13 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:bb7952bb-1f3b-44ce...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Mar 16, 9:12 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > > WHO is toad vaughan?>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > > > ALL in his own words.
>
> > > Who is Ellen, Tom?
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > > Someone NOT afraid of evidence/testimony.
>
> > > I heard you married a Priest toad.
>
> > > STILL Runnin from evidence/testimony Loser?>>>
>
> > >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
>
> > >http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> > > Nobody can blame you after the way I Stuffed it up your ass with Lee J.
> > > Bowers>>>
>
> > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
> > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
On Mar 22, 7:10 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:7d63d8d0-91ce-4c80...@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Tom,
>
> Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> Todd
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> Based on>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
Tom,
Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
Tim brought up about your web-site?
Todd
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm Based on>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self. Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall? Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired? Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>>>> > <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message>> >news:21e43746-70c5-4711...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...> > TOP POST>> > Hi tomnln,>> > Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim, tomnln, then> > why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/testimony in the> > form of CE2121, tomnln?>> > To whit, tomnln, your website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified> > Oswald as the person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,> > 1963, when Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23> > November, 1963.>> > And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on the matter,> > tomnln. Duran confirmed, straight up, on November 23, that Oswald WAS> > the guy she met in September 1963.>> > Oh, I get it tomnln. You don't FEAR evidence/testimony, you simply> > IGNORE evidence/testimony. Is that right, tomnln?>> > It would certainly appear to be the case, tomnln.>> > Concerned Regards,>> > Tim Brennan> > Sydney, Australia> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*>> > Here Ya go AGAIN Timmy;>> >http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> > On Mar 17, 2:13 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>> > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in> > >messagenews:bb7952bb-1f3b-44ce...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...> > > On Mar 16, 9:12 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>> > > > WHO is toad vaughan?>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm>> > > > ALL in his own words.>> > > Who is Ellen, Tom?> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> > > Someone NOT afraid of evidence/testimony.>> > > I heard you married a Priest toad.>> > > STILL Runnin from evidence/testimony Loser?>>>>> > >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm>> > >http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm>> > > Nobody can blame you after the way I Stuffed it up your ass with LeeJ.> > > Bowers>>>>> > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm> > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> > > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in> > > >messagenews:2c4e12c8-a69a-4a33...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...> > > > On Mar 16, 1:04 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > > > > On Mar 16, 3:39 am, "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com>> > > > > wrote:>> > > > > > David,>> > > > > > In a thead titled "A Sincere Question For David Healy", you> > > > > > stated:>> > > > > > QUOTE ON:>> > > > > > Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963,I> > > > > > honestly believe you, nor anyone else in the entire world can> > > > > > positively ID Abraham Zapruder, based in those veryfilms-photos,> > > > > > as> > > > > > the person standing on the pedestal in Dealey Plaza...>> > > > > > QUOTE OFF>> > > > > > I then asked:>> > > > > shuck and jive son.... we're attempting to ID Zapruder, thealleged> > > > > guy standing on the pedestal, give me/us a positive ID based onANY> > > > > picture of film shot/taken in Dealey Plaza that day. You CAN'T,> > > > > simple> > > > > as that... (called foundation, Todd) as a daBug adherent you know> > > > > where to go to get the definition>> > > > > > QUOTE ON:>> > > > > > Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963,> > > > > > can> > > > > > you or anyone else in the entire world, positively ID any of the> > > > > > following> > > > > > people, based in those very films-photos, as being present in> > > > > > Dealey> > > > > > Plaza at> > > > > > the time of the assassination:>> > > > > > Oriville Nix> > > > > > Marie Muchmore> > > > > > Charles Bronson> > > > > > Phil Willis> > > > > > Hugh Betzner> > > > > > Elsie Dorman> > > > > > Jay Skaggs> > > > > > Wilma Bond> > > > > > Jim Towner> > > > > > Tina Towner> > > > > > James Altgens> > > > > > Richard Bothun>> > > > > > QUOTE OFF>> > > > > > Are you going to answer me, or is that too tough a question for> > > > > > the> > > > > > self-proclaimed expert on DP photography?>> > > > > Me, self-proclaimed expert on DP photography? That's your venueson,>> > > > Nope, you claimed you forgot more that I ever knew on DPphotography.>> > > > So, impress us with your vast knowledge.>> > > > >I> > > > > *know* the Zapruder film and I can't ID him in any of these other> > > > > films - photos, Gary Mack can't do it either, ASK him (you needhis> > > > > number?)... how about you convincing me and the lurkers, youcan --> > > > > simple as that, guy.>> > > > David, David, David,>> > > > Have you ever in your life just addressed something in a straight-> > > > forward manner? Was it this bad 'rouind the old Healy dinner table?>> > > > Healy Mom: "So David, what did you do at school today?"> > > > Healy Son David: "How do you know I even went to school? Can youprove> > > > it?">> > > > Why all of the bullshit all of the time, David?>> > > > My point, one that you surely MUST have understood but certainly did> > > > not address, is that there were scores of photographers in Dealey> > > > Plaza who were there and who took photos and films, yet many of whom> > > > we are not able to positively identify as being those persons viathe> > > > films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza.>> > > > If we are to then use sick, twisted type of "logic", theiridentities> > > > and claims that they were there and took their photos and films must> > > > be questioned. Perhaps all of their photos and films were altered.> > > > Perhaps they were invovled inthe conspiracy itself.>> > > > Sorry, life doesn't work that way, David, except in Kookland.>> > > > Healy Dad: "Could you please pass the potatoes, David?> > > > Healy Son David: "How do you know they're potatoes?>> > > > Todd>> > > > positively ID any of the>> > > > > > following> > > > > > people, based in those very films-photos, as being present in> > > > > > Dealey> > > > > > Plaza at> > > > > > the time of the assassination:>> > > > > > Todd- Hide quoted text ->> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> - Show quoted text -
Todd W. Vaughan
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:541f4850-ea6d-4bfe...@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 22, 7:10 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:7d63d8d0-91ce-4c80...@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Tom,
>
> > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > Todd
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> > The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> > Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> Tom,
>
> Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> Todd
>
Tom,
Hmm, I guess you're too scared to address the questions regarding
evidence/testimony that Tim brought up about your web-site.
Put Ellen on and let us talk to her.
Todd
<timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message>> >news:21e43746-70c5-4711-8101-
fdba1b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...> > TOP POST>> > Hi
tomnln,>> > Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim,
tomnln, then> > why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/
testimony in the> > form of CE2121, tomnln?>> > To whit, tomnln, your
website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified> > Oswald as the
person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,> > 1963, when
Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23> > November,
1963.>> > And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on
the matter,> > tomnln. Duran confirmed, straight up, on November 23,
that Oswald WAS> > the guy she met in September 1963.>> > Oh, I get it
tomnln. You don't FEAR evidence/testimony, you simply> > IGNORE
evidence/testimony. Is that right, tomnln?>> > It would certainly
appear to be the case, tomnln.>> > Concerned Regards,>> > Tim Brennan>
> Sydney, Australia> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*>> > Here Ya go AGAIN
Timmy;>> >http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > On Mar 17, 2:13 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>> > > "Todd
W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in> >
>messagenews:bb7952bb-1f3b-44ce...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.
com...> > > On Mar 16, 9:12 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>> > >
> WHO is toad vaughan?>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm>> >
> > ALL in his own words.>> > > Who is Ellen, Tom?> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > Someone NOT afraid of evidence/testimony.>> > > I heard you
married a Priest toad.>> > > STILL Runnin from evidence/testimony
Loser?>>>>> > >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm>> > >http://
whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm>> > > Nobody can blame you after
the way I Stuffed it up your ass with LeeJ.> > > Bowers>>>>> > >
SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm> > > SEE>>>http://
whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm> >>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in> > >
>messagenews:2c4e12c8-a69a-4a33-
bfb7-760...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...> > > > On Mar 16,
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Todd,
Say, this might be an opportune time to revisit the anomalies in
tomnln's Mexico City page, pointed out months ago to tomnln.
Now tomnln, if you're there, I just checked that link to your Mexico
City website page you provided and it still contains the following:
QUOTE ON:
INTENTIONAL DECEPTION HERE? (below)
The woman who served Oswald in the Cuban Embassy was Sylvia Duran a
Mexican National.
Duran originally said the Oswald arrested for the assassination was
NOT the same Oswald she served Oswald in Mexico City.
Sylvia Duran and her whole family were arrested by the Mexican
Authorities TWICE.
As of 11/25/63 the Dallas FBI already Heard CIA audio tapes. See
Below.
Sylvia Duran then and only then ID'd Oswald as the one she served in
Mexico City.
QUOTE OFF
But tomnln, Mrs Duran's statement in CE 2121 (24H587) dated 23
November, 1963:
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0303a.htm
Contains the following statement by Mrs Duran (24H590):
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0304b.htm
She immediately recognized Oswald, tomnln. Did you see that?
Let's examine that again, shall we tomnln. Duran says, on 23 November,
1963: *...upon seeing his photograph which appears in today's
newspapers, specifically in the newspaper 'El Dia,' she immediately
recognized and identified it as being the same person that she has
been referring to as LEE HARVEY OSWALD.*
How does that gell with what is on your website, tomnln?
It doesn't, does it tomnln?
You don't FEAR evidence/testimony do you, tomnln?
Or do you simply IGNORE evidence/testimony?
Say it ain't so, tomnln!
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Mar 23, 11:09 am, "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 22, 8:00 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:541f4850-ea6d-4bfe...@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 22, 7:10 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:7d63d8d0-91ce-4c80...@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > Tom,
>
> > > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > > Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > > Todd
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > > Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> > > The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> > > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> > Tom,
>
> > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > Todd
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>> SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htmBasedon>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htmTheone you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self. Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall? Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired? Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>>>> >
>
> Tom,
>
> Hmm, I guess you're too scared to address the questions regarding
> evidence/testimony that Tim brought up about your web-site.
>
> Put Ellen on and let us talk to her.
>
> Todd
>
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message>> >news:21e43746-70c5-4711-8101-
>
> fdba1bc03...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...> > TOP POST>> > Hi
> bfb7-760f7070a...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...> > > > On Mar 16,
tomnln
On Mar 22, 8:00 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:541f4850-ea6d-4bfe...@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 22, 7:10 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:7d63d8d0-91ce-4c80...@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Tom,
>
> > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > Todd
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> > The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> > Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> Tom,
>
> Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> Todd
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City.
Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
(Item /#3)
Would you care to comment on Duran's description???
I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
Based on>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
You LOST on Bowers
Tim LOST on Duran
No wonder you Losers stick together.
Wanna try these?>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
tomnln
Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
What parts of that don't you understand timmy?
Now, you're trying to get toad to agree with you??
He probably will;
You're both cut from the same Lying cloth.
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6f2716a7-e078-416b...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
LOL! Naw, Tim didn't already LOSE when you posted that very optimistic
interpretation of what Mrs Duran said in her HSCA testimony, tomnln.
That's because, tomnln, on multiple occasions in the VERY SAME
DOCUMENT Duran says that Oswald WAS the person she met. Isn't that so,
tomnln?
Here's an example, page 79 of Duran's testimony in HSCA Vol. 3:
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol3/html/HSCA_Vol3_0042a.htm
You lost, tomnln, when you were forced to resort to 1978 testimony in
the first place to back up your absurd claim that she *originally*
said the person she met wasn't Oswald. That was just a lie on your
part, wasn't it tomnln?
*Originally* is 1963, tomnln. Not 1978, tomnln.
The only thing you got is that she said his hair may have been lighter
than the man she met, tomnln. So what?
She saw his photo in the paper El Dia on November 23, 1963, tomnln.
She attended the consulate and checked the records that day and found
his transit visa application with his signature and photo on it.
She was shown his mugshot in 1978 by the HSCA people and she said it
was him she met.
You seem to FEAR your own evidence/testimony, tomnln.
Not surprising as, once again, it doesn't support your ludicrous
arguments.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Mar 23, 11:46 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:4c807c39-409f-4312...@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
>
> Tom,
>
> Hmm, I guess you're too scared to address the questions regarding
> evidence/testimony that Tim brought up about your web-site.
>
> Put Ellen on and let us talk to her.
>
> Todd
>
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message>> >news:21e43746-70c5-4711-8101-
>
> fdba1bc03...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...> > TOP POST>> > Hi
> bfb7-760f7070a...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...> > > > On Mar 16,
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, you don't seem very keen to address the fact that your website
disagrees with evidence/testimony, tomnln.
Now why is that tomnln?
I already told you, many times, your very hopeful interpretation of
what Mrs Duran said is nixed multiple times in the very document you
used to arrive at your nonsense.
She says the person was Oswald, tomnln.
She said it in 1963.
She said it in 1978.
She said it later than that.
Your interpretation of the evidence is laughable, tomnln.
I pointed out months ago that your website didn't agree with your
precious evidence/testimony, tomnln.
Do you have any explanation as to why you haven't removed the lies
from your website, about Mrs Duran, tomnln?
Hiding behind your lame interpretation of Duran's HSCA testimony won't
help you, tomnln.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Mar 23, 12:06 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> What parts of that don't you understand timmy?
>
> Now, you're trying to get toad to agree with you??
>
> He probably will;
> You're both cut from the same Lying cloth.
>
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6f2716a7-e078-416b...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi Todd,
>
> Say, this might be an opportune time to revisit the anomalies in
> tomnln's Mexico City page, pointed out months ago to tomnln.
>
> Now tomnln, if you're there, I just checked that link to your Mexico
> City website page you provided and it still contains the following:
>
> QUOTE ON:
>
> INTENTIONAL DECEPTION HERE? (below)
>
> The woman who served Oswald in the Cuban Embassy was Sylvia Duran a
> Mexican National.
>
> Duran originally said the Oswald arrested for the assassination was
> NOT the same Oswald she served Oswald in Mexico City.
>
> Sylvia Duran and her whole family were arrested by the Mexican
> Authorities TWICE.
>
> As of 11/25/63 the Dallas FBI already Heard CIA audio tapes. See
> Below.
>
> Sylvia Duran then and only then ID'd Oswald as the one she served in
> Mexico City.
>
> QUOTE OFF
>
> But tomnln, Mrs Duran's statement in CE 2121 (24H587) dated 23
> November, 1963:
>
> http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0...
>
> Contains the following statement by Mrs Duran (24H590):
>
> http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0...
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a464f2ec-c10b-4842...@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol3/html/HSCA_Vol3_0042a.htm
Concerned Regards,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here it is AGAIN timmy>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
Read it & Weep Timmy>>>
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:833e9e89-83fb-43e5...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
Say, you don't seem very keen to address the fact that your website
disagrees with evidence/testimony, tomnln.
Now why is that tomnln?
I already told you, many times, your very hopeful interpretation of
what Mrs Duran said is nixed multiple times in the very document you
used to arrive at your nonsense.
She says the person was Oswald, tomnln.
She said it in 1963.
She said it in 1978.
She said it later than that.
Your interpretation of the evidence is laughable, tomnln.
I pointed out months ago that your website didn't agree with your
precious evidence/testimony, tomnln.
Do you have any explanation as to why you haven't removed the lies
from your website, about Mrs Duran, tomnln?
Hiding behind your lame interpretation of Duran's HSCA testimony won't
help you, tomnln.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this your Denial that Duran described Oswald in the following manner????
Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
Even the top man in the Cuban Embasy Eusebio Azcue said Durasn was subject
to Intimidation.
Azcue was NOT.
Azcue said it was NOT Oswald he saw 3 times in Mexico City.
Church Committee said it was NOT Oswald.
Lopez Report said it was NOT Oswald.
WC Lawyers Slawson/Coleman said it was NOT Oswald.
http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
Todd W. Vaughan
> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:541f4850-ea6d-4bfe...@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 22, 7:10 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >> messagenews:7d63d8d0-91ce-4c80...@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> Tom,
>
> >> Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> >> Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> >> Todd
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
Hey Bitch, get making eggs and bacon for the overnight guests.
>
> >> SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> >> Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> >> The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> >> Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> >> Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> >> Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> > Tom,
>
> > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > Todd
>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self. Do you also believe that
> Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
tomnln
On Mar 23, 12:51 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:541f4850-ea6d-4bfe...@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 22, 7:10 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >> messagenews:7d63d8d0-91ce-4c80...@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> Tom,
>
> >> Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> >> Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> >> Todd
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
Da toad wrote;
Hey Bitch, get making eggs and bacon for the overnight guests.
I write;
Get to bed Dicky Licker;
If you gonna Eat Cub Scouts for Easter Dinner, you gotta get up Very Early.
(don't starve your wife/kids)
If you get time, address your evidence/testimony>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
You've been RUNNIN from them for Years.
ps;
Guess where I HID "My Eggs" in your wife/kids????
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd W. Vaughan
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:a0c2d2f7-ae16-4eef...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 23, 12:51 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >news:541f4850-ea6d-4bfe...@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Mar 22, 7:10 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> > >> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > >> messagenews:7d63d8d0-91ce-4c80...@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > >> Tom,
>
> > >> Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > >> Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > >> Todd
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> Da toad wrote;
>
> Hey Bitch, get making eggs and bacon for the overnight guests.
>
> I write;
>
> Get to bed Dicky Licker;
>
> If you gonna Eat Cub Scouts for Easter Dinner, you gotta get up Very Early.
> (don't starve your wife/kids)
>
> If you get time, address your evidence/testimony>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> You've been RUNNIN from them for Years.
>
> ps;
>
> Guess where I HID "My Eggs" in your wife/kids????
I don't know, Bitch, why don't you just say where?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>> > >> SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm>> > >> Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm>> > >> The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.>> > >> Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?> > >> Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?> > >> Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?>> > > Tom,>> > > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that> > > Tim brought up about your web-site?>> > > Todd>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>>> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm>> > Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm>> > The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self. Do you also believe that> > Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?> > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?> > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>> > On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>>>> >> > <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message>> >>>>news:21e43746-70c5-4711...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...>>> > TOP POST>> > Hi tomnln,>> >> > Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim, tomnln, then> >> > why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/testimony in the>>> > form of CE2121, tomnln?>> >> > To whit, tomnln, your website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified>>> > Oswald as the person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,> >> > 1963, when Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23> >November,> > 1963.>> >> > And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on the matter,>>> > tomnln. Duran confirmed, straight up, on November 23, that Oswald WAS> >> > the guy she met in September 1963.>> >> > Oh, I get it tomnln. You don't FEAR evidence/testimony, you simply> >> > IGNORE evidence/testimony. Is that right, tomnln?>> >> > It would certainly appear to be the case, tomnln.>> >> > Concerned Regards,>> > Tim Brennan> > Sydney, Australia> >> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*>> >> > Here Ya go AGAIN Timmy;>> >http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>> > > On Mar 17, 2:13 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>> > >>> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in> > >> >messagenews:bb7952bb-1f3b-44ce...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...>>> > On Mar 16, 9:12 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>> > > >> > WHO is toad vaughan?>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm>> > > >> > ALL in his own words.>> > >> > Who is Ellen, Tom?>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>> > Someone NOT afraid of evidence/testimony.>> > >> > I heard you married a Priest toad.>> > >> > STILL Runnin from evidence/testimony Loser?>>>>> >> > >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm>> >> > >http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm>> > >> > Nobody can blame you after the way I Stuffed it up your ass with LeeJ.>>>> > Bowers>>>>> > >> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm> > >> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>> > > > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in> > > >>> >messagenews:2c4e12c8-a69a-4a33...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...>>> > On Mar 16, 1:04 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > > > >> > On Mar 16, 3:39 am, "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com>> > > > >> > wrote:>> > > > > >> > David,>> > > > > >> > In a thead titled "A Sincere Question For David Healy", you> > > > > >> > stated:>> > > > > >> > QUOTE ON:>> > > > > >> > Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963,I> > > >>>> > honestly believe you, nor anyone else in the entire world can> > > > > >> > positively ID Abraham Zapruder, based in those veryfilms-photos,> > > >>>> > as> > > > > >> > the person standing on the pedestal in Dealey Plaza...>> > > > > >> > QUOTE OFF>> > > > > >> > I then asked:>> > > > >> > shuck and jive son.... we're attempting to ID Zapruder, thealleged> > >>>> > guy standing on the pedestal, give me/us a positive ID based onANY> > >>>> > picture of film shot/taken in Dealey Plaza that day. You CAN'T,> > > > >> > simple> > > > > as that... (called foundation, Todd) as a daBug adherent> > you> > know> > > > >> > where to go to get the definition>> > > > > >> > QUOTE ON:>> > > > > >> > Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963,> > > >>>> > can> > > > > >> > you or anyone else in the entire world, positively ID any of the> > > >>>> > following> > > > > >> > people, based in those very films-photos, as being present in> > > > > >> > Dealey> > > > > > Plaza at> > > > > >> > the time of the assassination:>> > > > > >> > Oriville Nix> > > > > > Marie Muchmore> > > > > > Charles Bronson> > > >>>> > Phil Willis> > > > > > Hugh Betzner> > > > > > Elsie Dorman> > > > > >Jay> > Skaggs> > > > > > Wilma Bond> > > > > > Jim Towner> > > > > > TinaTowner>>> > > > > > James Altgens> > > > > > Richard Bothun>> > > > > > QUOTE OFF>>>>> > > > > Are you going to answer me, or is that too tough a question for> >>>> > > > the> > > > > > self-proclaimed expert on DP photography?>> > > > >Me,> > self-proclaimed expert on DP photography? That's your venueson,>> > > >> > Nope, you claimed you forgot more that I ever knew on DPphotography.>> >>>> > So, impress us with your vast knowledge.>> > > > >I> > > > > *know* the> > Zapruder film and I can't ID him in any of these other> > > > > films -> > photos, Gary Mack can't do it either, ASK him (you needhis> > > > >> > number?)... how about you convincing me and the lurkers, youcan --> > >>>> > simple as that, guy.>> > > > David, David, David,>> > > > Have you everin> > your life just addressed something in a straight-> > > > forward manner?> > Was> > it this bad 'rouind the old Healy dinner table?>> > > > Healy Mom: "So> > David, what did you do at school today?"> > > > Healy Son David: "How do> > you> > know I even went to school? Can youprove> > > > it?">> > > > Why all of> > the> > bullshit all of the time, David?>> > > > My point, one that you surely> > MUST> > have understood but certainly did> > > > not address, is that there were> > scores of photographers in Dealey> > > > Plaza who were there and whotook> > photos and films, yet many of whom> > > > we are not able to positively> > identify as being those persons viathe> > > > films and photos taken in> > Delaey Plaza.>> > > > If we are to then use sick, twisted type of"logic",> > theiridentities> > > > and claims that they were there and took their> > photos> > and films must> > > > be questioned. Perhaps all of their photos andfilms> > were altered.> > > > Perhaps they were invovled inthe conspiracyitself.>>>> > > > Sorry, life doesn't work that way, David, except in Kookland.>> > >>> > Healy Dad: "Could you please pass the potatoes, David?> > > > Healy Son> > David: "How do you know they're potatoes?>> > > > Todd>> > > >positively> > ID> > any of the>> > > > > > following> > > > > > people, based in those very> > films-photos, as being present in> > > > > > Dealey> > > > > > Plaza at>>>> > > > > the time of the assassination:>> > > > > > Todd- Hide quoted> > > > > text ->>> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > > > - Show quoted> > text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted> > text ->> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > - Show> > quoted> > text -- Hide quoted text ->> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted> > text ->> -> > Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> - Show quoted text -
aeffects
looks like Timmy from down-undah ran away to hide.....
> ...
>
> read more »
Todd W. Vaughan
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:b189f466-3233-438a...@e60g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Coward.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>> > >> SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm>> > >> Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm>> > >> The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.>> > >> Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?> > >> Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?> > >> Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?>> > > Tom,>> > > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that> > > Tim brought up about your web-site?>> > > Todd>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>>> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm>> > Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm>> > The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self. Do you also believe that> > Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?> > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?> > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>> > On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>>>> >> > <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message>> >>>>news:21e43746-70c5-4711...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...>>> > TOP POST>> > Hi tomnln,>> >> > Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim, tomnln, then> >> > why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/testimony in the>>> > form of CE2121, tomnln?>> >> > To whit, tomnln, your website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified>>> > Oswald as the person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,> >> > 1963, when Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23> >November,> > 1963.>> >> > And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on the matter,>>> > tomnln. Duran confirmed, straight up, on November 23, that Oswald WAS> >> > the guy she met in September 1963.>> >> > Oh, I get it tomnln. You don't FEAR evidence/testimony, you simply> >> > IGNORE evidence/testimony. Is that right, tomnln?>> >> > It would certainly appear to be the case, tomnln.>> >> > Concerned Regards,>> > Tim Brennan> > Sydney, Australia> >> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*>> >> > Here Ya go AGAIN Timmy;>> >http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>> > > On Mar 17, 2:13 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>> > >>> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in> > >> >messagenews:bb7952bb-1f3b-44ce...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...>>> > On Mar 16, 9:12 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>> > > >> > WHO is toad vaughan?>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm>> > > >> > ALL in his own words.>> > >> > Who is Ellen, Tom?>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>> > Someone NOT afraid of evidence/testimony.>> > >> > I heard you married a Priest toad.>> > >> > STILL Runnin from evidence/testimony Loser?>>>>> >> > >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm>> >> > >http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm>> > >> > Nobody can blame you after the way I Stuffed it up your ass with LeeJ.>>>> > Bowers>>>>> > >> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm> > >> > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>> > > > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in> > > >>> >messagenews:2c4e12c8-a69a-4a33...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...>>> > On Mar 16, 1:04 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > > > >> > On Mar 16, 3:39 am, "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com>> > > > >> > wrote:>> > > > > >> > David,>> > > > > >> > In a thead titled "A Sincere Question For David Healy", you> > > > > >> > stated:>> > > > > >> > QUOTE ON:>> > > > > >> > Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963,I> > > >>>> > honestly believe you, nor anyone else in the entire world can> > > > > >> > positively ID Abraham Zapruder, based in those veryfilms-photos,> > > >>>> > as> > > > > >> > the person standing on the pedestal in Dealey Plaza...>> > > > > >> > QUOTE OFF>> > > > > >> > I then asked:>> > > > >> > shuck and jive son.... we're attempting to ID Zapruder, thealleged> > >>>> > guy standing on the pedestal, give me/us a positive ID based onANY> > >>>> > picture of film shot/taken in Dealey Plaza that day. You CAN'T,> > > > >> > simple> > > > > as that... (called foundation, Todd) as a daBug adherent> > you> > know> > > > >> > where to go to get the definition>> > > > > >> > QUOTE ON:>> > > > > >> > Using the films and photos taken in Delaey Plaza, Nov 22nd 1963,> > > >>>> > can> > > > > >> > you or anyone else in the entire world, positively ID any of the> > > >>>> > following> > > > > >> > people, based in those very films-photos, as being present in> > > > > >> > Dealey> > > > > > Plaza at> > > > > >> > the time of the assassination:>> > > > > >> > Oriville Nix> > > > > > Marie Muchmore> > > > > > Charles Bronson> > > >>>> > Phil Willis> > > > > > Hugh Betzner> > > > > > Elsie Dorman> > > > > >Jay> > Skaggs> > > > > > Wilma Bond> > > > > > Jim Towner> > > > > > TinaTowner>>> > > > > > James Altgens> > > > > > Richard Bothun>> > > > > > QUOTE OFF>>>>> > > > > Are you going to answer me, or is that too tough a question for> >>>> > > > the> > > > > > self-proclaimed expert on DP photography?>> > > > >Me,> > self-proclaimed expert on DP photography? That's your venueson,>> > > >> > Nope, you claimed you forgot more that I ever knew on DPphotography.>> >>>> > So, impress us with your vast knowledge.>> > > > >I> > > > > *know* the> > Zapruder film and I can't ID him in any of these other> > > > > films -> > photos, Gary Mack can't do it either, ASK him (you needhis> > > > >> > number?)... how about you convincing me and the lurkers, youcan --> > >>>> > simple as that, guy.>> > > > David, David, David,>> > > > Have you everin> > your life just addressed something in a straight-> > > > forward manner?> > Was> > it this bad 'rouind the old Healy dinner table?>> > > > Healy Mom: "So> > David, what did you do at school today?"> > > > Healy Son David: "How do> > you> > know I even went to school? Can youprove> > > > it?">> > > > Why all of> > the> > bullshit all of the time, David?>> > > > My point, one that you surely> > MUST> > have understood but certainly did> > > > not address, is that there were> > scores of photographers in Dealey> > > > Plaza who were there and whotook> > photos and films, yet many of whom> > > > we are not able to positively> > identify as being those persons viathe> > > > films and photos taken in> > Delaey Plaza.>> > > > If we are to then use sick, twisted type of"logic",> > theiridentities> > > > and claims that they were there and took their> > photos> > and films must> > > > be questioned. Perhaps all of their photos andfilms> > were altered.> > > > Perhaps they were invovled inthe conspiracyitself.>>>> > > > Sorry, life doesn't work that way, David, except in Kookland.>> > >>> > Healy Dad: "Could you please pass the potatoes, David?> > > > Healy Son> > David: "How do you know they're potatoes?>> > > > Todd>> > > >positively> > ID> > any of the>> > > > > > following> > > > > > people, based in those very> > films-photos, as being present in> > > > > > Dealey> > > > > > Plaza at>>>> > > > > the time of the assassination:>> > > > > > Todd- Hide quoted> > > > > text ->>> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > > > - Show quoted> > text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted> > text ->> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > > - Show> > quoted> > text -- Hide quoted text ->> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted> > text ->> -> > Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
aeffects
>
> Probably you're right, LOL!
>
> Still, if Ben does want to turn up with his mate, Healy, here are some
> useful on-line tools provided by Mark the other day that show just how
> wrong their theory is:
we understand son, that your very anxious about the 45 questions and
the 16 smoking guns (as well you should) you can't hide a tainted DP
photo/film record..... now can you gird those manly loins of yours
(you do have loins, eh?) and tackle those questions and smoking
guns....
The old crone Justme1952 (our resident self-proclaimed lesbian
impersonator) doesn't need propping up, she needs help for sure... I
doubt you'd be willing to do THAT job, maybe not, eh?
justm...@gmail.com
Still waiting for you to post the link where i said that ....drug
induced liar.
tomnln
Coward.
I address evidence/testimony....YOU DON'T
I gave you my address...............YOU DIDN'T
You were CAUGHT IN lies......ON BOWERS
YOU'RE THE COWARD.
Caugh up any Cub Scouts today?
tims...@gmail.com
Say, it looks like tomnln has told yet another lie. The Lopez Report
said it was Oswald. How many lies is tomnln going to chalk up on this
matter?
No wonder a proven liar like David (*I've got a B/W galley proof copy
of the book Four Days*) Healy supports tomnln. He's a liar too!
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Is this your Denial that Duran described Oswald in the following manner????
>
> > Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> > Even the top man in the Cuban Embasy Eusebio Azcue said Durasn was subject
> > to Intimidation.
> > Azcue was NOT.
>
> > Azcue said it was NOT Oswald he saw 3 times in Mexico City.
>
> > Church Committee said it was NOT Oswald.
> > Lopez Report said it was NOT Oswald.
> > WC Lawyers Slawson/Coleman said it was NOT Oswald.
>
> looks like Timmy from down-undah ran away to hide.....
>
>
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
aeffects
> TOP POST
>
> Say, it looks like tomnln has told yet another lie. The Lopez Report
> said it was Oswald. How many lies is tomnln going to chalk up on this
> matter?
>
> No wonder a proven liar like David (*I've got a B/W galley proof copy
> of the book Four Days*) Healy supports tomnln. He's a liar too!
son, you gotta do better than this, you're sounding like a third rate
lone Neuter from 10 years ago.... you got the money, let me know, till
then, back in the pud pulling corner with-ya
> ...
>
> read more »
tims...@gmail.com
We understand, pops, that you don't want to address specifics
regarding how your and Ben's theory re Yellow Legs and Z film
alteration is a dud, do you pops?
Say, isn't that one of your sixteen smoking guns, pops? It really was
hopeless, pops, and you don't seem inclined to prop it up anymore.
Say, seen Ben lately, pops? He's gone MIA.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
tims...@gmail.com
Say, pops, have a look at this here map of Dealey Plaza, pops. You'll
have to click the button to expand it, pops. Think you can manage
that?:
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/images/DealeyPlaza.gif
Now, pops, notice where it says Nix was standing? Notice the the four
dots along Main at Dealey that indicate the street lamps?
That's why you and Ben got it so wrong, pops-e-roll. The Nix film
picked up street light number 2 but the Zapruder film picked up street
light number three, behind the Franzen group.
Simple, eh pops? No smoking gun there.
Helpful Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Todd W. Vaughan
> have to click the button to expand it, pops. Think you can manage
> that?:
>
> http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/images/DealeyPlaza.gif
>
> Now, pops, notice where it says Nix was standing? Notice the the four
> dots along Main at Dealey that indicate the street lamps?
>
> That's why you and Ben got it so wrong, pops-e-roll. The Nix film
> picked up street light number 2 but the Zapruder film picked up street
> light number three, behind the Franzen group.
>
> Simple, eh pops? No smoking gun there.
>
> Helpful Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Tim.
I'm SHOCKED.
No answer, no reply, nothing, from Healy The All Knowing.
But how can that be?
He's all knowing. He better than both you and I...and everyone else.
He's working on solving the assassination.
He's Healy. All powerful. Master of all he surveys.
But alas, no answer.
Just like with my question for him regarding Mark Lane.
Me thinks there is a pattern here.
David?
David?
Todd
> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> > > > > > > > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > > > > > > > > Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> > > > > > > > > The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> > > > > > > > Tom,
>
> > > > > > > > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > > > > > > > Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > > > > > > > Todd
>
> > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
> > > > > > > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htmBasedon>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htmTheone
> > > > > > > > you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self. Do you also believe that Oswald
> > > > > > > > was 5 ft. 3 inches tall? Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond
> > > > > > > > Haired? Do you also believe that Oswald was 119
> > > > > > > > pounds?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
> > > > > > > > On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>>>> >
>
> > > > > > > Tom,
>
> > > > > > > Hmm, I guess you're too scared to address the questions regarding
> > > > > > > evidence/testimony that Tim brought up about your web-site.
>
> > > > > > > Put Ellen on and let us talk to her.
>
> > > > > > > Todd
>
> > > > > > > <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message>> >news:21e43746-70c5-4711-8101-
>
> > > > > > > fdba1bc03...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...> > TOP POST>> > Hi
> > > > > > > tomnln,>> > Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim,
> > > > > > > tomnln, then> > why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/
> > > > > > > testimony in the> > form of CE2121, tomnln?>> > To whit, tomnln, your
> > > > > > > website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified> > Oswald as the
> > > > > > > person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,> > 1963, when
> > > > > > > Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23> > November,
> > > > > > > 1963.>> > And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on
>
Todd W. Vaughan
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:9c089d7a-7af0-49df...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
No, you TWIST evidence/testimony, by misrepresenting it, by failing to
understand it, and by lying about it.
> I gave you my address...............YOU DIDN'T
Correct, I did not give you your address.
You claimed that you visited my neighborhood and "saw where (I) live".
But, funny thing, you didn't knock on the door. And you didn't
otherwise approach men
> You were CAUGHT IN lies......ON BOWERS
Not at all.
It was/is YOU who lie about Bowers.
Nowhere is Bowers on record as saying he saw two (or three) men run
from the fence.
Nowhere is Bowers on record as saying he saw two (or three) men run
from the fence and jump on a railroad car.
He said nothing of the sort in his 11/2263 statement, nor in his WC
testimony, nor in his filmed interview with Mark Lane.
>
> YOU'RE THE COWARD.
>
> Caugh up any Cub Scouts today?
You're a very sick old man who needs serious help on many fronts.
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Todd,
I myself am SHOCKED, SHOCKED I tell you, that the ol' David *aeffects*
Healy won't answer specific criticisms dealing with his Z film
alteration theory.
A number of us, you, me, Mark, Burly, Just, Yo, Marty, etc have been
working night and day to inform the old Toots-E-Roll that his Z film
alteration thing is a CROCK!
And what thanks do we get?!! NOTHING!! The ol' Toots-E-Roll won't even
blunder by and give a passing opinion on all the things that prove his
and Ben Holmes's *Yellow Legs Proves Nix/Zapruder Alteration* theory
is complete rubbish.
All Healy can do is hide behind his pathetic claim to own a galley
proof copy of the book Four Days that is in black and white and all
Holmes can do is hide behind his killfilter while agreeing with Healy
that he probably owns such an item.
Imagine that! At least three and half million copies of Four Days sold
worldwide and David Healy is the only person to have a totally black
and white <snicker> *Galley Proof* copy that just happens to help Ben
Holmes's argument re Z film alteration! At the time...
I think we all know that *Benny & The Vet* are entirely ludicrous,
LOL! No wonder they like Mark Lane.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
ps Todd, seen Benny lately? Benny! Benny! Yoo Hoo, Benny! Where'd ya
go, Benny? TB
> > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> > > > > > > > > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > > > > > > > > > Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> > > > > > > > > > The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> > > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> > > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> > > > > > > > > Tom,
>
> > > > > > > > > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > > > > > > > > Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > > > > > > > > Todd
>
> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
> > > > > > > > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htmBasedon>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htmTheone
> > > > > > > > > you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self. Do you also believe that Oswald
> > > > > > > > > was 5 ft. 3 inches tall? Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond
> > > > > > > > > Haired? Do you also believe that Oswald was 119
> > > > > > > > > pounds?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
> > > > > > > > > On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>>>> >
>
> > > > > > > > Tom,
>
> > > > > > > > Hmm, I guess you're too scared to address the questions regarding
> > > > > > > > evidence/testimony that Tim brought up about your
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
justm...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> > > > > > > > > > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> > > > > > > > > > > The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> > > > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> > > > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> > > > > > > > > > Tom,
>
> > > > > > > > > > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > > > > > > > > > Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > > > > > > > > > Todd
>
> > > > > > > > > > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
> > > > > > > > > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htmBasedon>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htmTheone
> > > > > > > > > > you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self. Do you also believe that Oswald
> > > > > > > > > > was 5 ft. 3 inches tall? Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond
> > > > > > > > > > Haired? Do you also believe that Oswald was 119
> > > > > > > > > > pounds?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
> > > > > > > > > > On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>>>> >
>
> > > > > > > > > Tom,
>
> > > > > > > > > Hmm, I guess you're too scared to address the questions regarding
> > > > > > > > > evidence/testimony that Tim brought up about your
>
> > ...
>
> > read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Tim,
I was up early this morning and board so I did a search on Healy on
google and read some of his posts on Lancer and the Education forum. I
needed a good laugh LOL. He was/is ridiculed as much on those forums
as he is here for his incoherent jargon, and NEVER posting anything
related to the JFK assassination.
Now, this could be because for 40 years toots has been researching the
assassination of John FRANCIS Kennedy, and hasn't found any
information ROFLMAO. As for being the "Mighty Lapdog" for Ben Holmes,
the turd doesn't fall far from the pile...(my own original quote
lol). Comparing Healy to an apple and Holmes to a tree is giving them
too much intellect.
As for the galley proof of Four Days, I have yet to find where any
galley proofs even existed. I've been looking. Doesn't really matter
because we all know Healy is lying thru the 2 teeth he has left in his
mouth.
Justme
aeffects
> TOP POST
>
> Hi Todd,
>
> I myself am SHOCKED, SHOCKED I tell you, that the ol' David *aeffects*
> Healy won't answer specific criticisms dealing with his Z film
> alteration theory.
>
> A number of us, you, me, Mark, Burly, Just, Yo, Marty, etc have been
> working night and day to inform the old Toots-E-Roll that his Z film
> alteration thing is a CROCK!
son, you antiqu atedold toots-e-roll, you don't make a pimple on a fly
ass concerning Z-film alteration (nor do any of the other dolts
pretending to know what their talking about.... (bet you jealous a
fellow Aussie knows a bit more about the subject matter than you do,
eh? You old Crone lover....)
> And what thanks do we get?!! NOTHING!! The ol' Toots-E-Roll won't even
> blunder by and give a passing opinion on all the things that prove his
> and Ben Holmes's *Yellow Legs Proves Nix/Zapruder Alteration* theory
> is complete rubbish.
>
> All Healy can do is hide behind his pathetic claim to own a galley
> proof copy of the book Four Days that is in black and white and all
> Holmes can do is hide behind his killfilter while agreeing with Healy
> that he probably owns such an item.
LMFAO!
> Imagine that! At least three and half million copies of Four Days sold
> worldwide and David Healy is the only person to have a totally black
> and white <snicker> *Galley Proof* copy that just happens to help Ben
> Holmes's argument re Z film alteration! At the time...
ROTFLMAO
> I think we all know that *Benny & The Vet* are entirely ludicrous,
> LOL! No wonder they like Mark Lane.
ROTFLMFAO -- Jesus dumbstruck, you're providing a bit of Easter relief
here..... Now, there's 45 questions and 16 smoking guns you can wrap
your fertile imagination around, till then toots-e-roll, your nothing
more than another perverted troll (we draw our fair share of them this
time of year -- over and above the regular lying pervs) we have
here....
> Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> ps Todd, seen Benny lately? Benny! Benny! Yoo Hoo, Benny! Where'd ya
> go, Benny? TB
your not gpoing to save Todd, toots-e-roll, he's already in the
shitter...something to do with Dale Myers and Vinnie Bugliosis' epic
mega-flop Reclaiming History.... I think Mark Lanes' [recent] comments
had a little something to do with it, too....... perk up son, you can
always bolt back to .johnnies..... now about those 45 questions.....
> ...
>
> read more »
aeffects
wrote:
that right you old crone..... (hee-hee) galley-proofs/page proofs
don't exist for anything published....ROTFLMFAO! (The reality is just
the opposite, they exist for every book published with photos, where
you looking crone, eBay?....
GAWD almighty you give an old fart a good laugh every now and then,..
Do you do hummmmmmer's too?
tomnln
On Mar 23, 11:00 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:9c089d7a-7af0-49df...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 23, 1:31 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:b189f466-3233-438a...@e60g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 23, 1:15 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:a0c2d2f7-ae16-4eef...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Mar 23, 12:51 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > >news:541f4850-ea6d-4bfe...@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > On Mar 22, 7:10 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> > > > >> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > > > >> messagenews:7d63d8d0-91ce-4c80...@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > >> Tom,
>
> > > > >> Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > > > >> Todd
Not at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
ALL in her own words.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5d4577d-b0fb-4b68...@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
justm...@gmail.com
> Just for Timmy>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Healy? Go seek professional help....you can't even type a single
sentance correctly. You are pathetic, and you wonder why you're
laughed at continually. Either your too drug/alcohol induced or you're
a illiterate moron...or both.
Absolutely amazing how you think you could ever be taken seriously
about anything when you can't even spell a word that has 4 letters in
it correctly. Here's a big Healy moment at you from just about every
LN and some CT's on this board ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO you
are an IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!
tims...@gmail.com
Hey Healy,
How come you didn't respond to this one, toots?
I thought you wanted to discuss Z film alteration.
Isn't that one of your <snicker> sixteen smoking guns, Toots-E-Roll.
If you're not quittin' Heals, then time to batter up.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
>
> > > > > > > > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> > > > > > > > > Based on>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>
> > > > > > > > > The one you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self.
>
> > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
> > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond Haired?
> > > > > > > > > Do you also believe that Oswald was 119 pounds?
>
> > > > > > > > Tom,
>
> > > > > > > > Why don't you address the questions regarding evidence/testimony that
> > > > > > > > Tim brought up about your web-site?
>
> > > > > > > > Todd
>
> > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > I Always thought this page of my website was your Favorite toad>>>
> > > > > > > > SEE>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htmBasedon>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htmTheone
> > > > > > > > you made a "FOOL" of your Lying self. Do you also believe that Oswald
> > > > > > > > was 5 ft. 3 inches tall? Do you also believe that Oswald was Blond
> > > > > > > > Haired? Do you also believe that Oswald was 119
> > > > > > > > pounds?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
> > > > > > > > On Mar 22, 3:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>>>> >
>
> > > > > > > Tom,
>
> > > > > > > Hmm, I guess you're too scared to address the questions regarding
> > > > > > > evidence/testimony that Tim brought up about your web-site.
>
> > > > > > > Put Ellen on and let us talk to her.
>
> > > > > > > Todd
>
> > > > > > > <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message>> >news:21e43746-70c5-4711-8101-
>
> > > > > > > fdba1bc03...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...> > TOP POST>> > Hi
> > > > > > > tomnln,>> > Say, if you don't fear evidence/testimony, as you claim,
> > > > > > > tomnln, then> > why does your Mexico City page disagree with evidence/
> > > > > > > testimony in the> > form of CE2121, tomnln?>> > To whit, tomnln, your
> > > > > > > website page says that Mrs Duran ONLY identified> > Oswald as the
> > > > > > > person she met at the Cuban Consulate on 25 November,> > 1963, when
> > > > > > > Mrs Duran actually says, in CE2121, that it was 23> > November,
> > > > > > > 1963.>> > And without all the spooky qualifiers your website puts on
>