EXECUTIVE ACTION
tomnln
"John Blubaugh" <jblu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dda3e086-62d9-47d2...@p19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 19, 9:15 am, yeuhd <needleswax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 10:28 pm, b garrett meadows <bgarrettmead...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Any comments on the veracity of the movie?
>
> It posits an Oswald-was-innocent theory, which loses all credibility
> right there. Trumbo was a member of the Communist Party USA in 1943-
> 1948, and was aligned with the party for many years before that, so
> it's not surprising that he makes the conspirators industrial fat cats
> who want their defense contracts expanded via Vietnam. And for added
> villainy, they oppose Kennedy's civil rights agenda too.
Dalton Trumbo was a great artist and the movie is representative of
some well known theories. However, it is just a movie not a
documentary. It is meant for intertainment and it does that well. LNs
are hilarious about movies like this and JFK that they expect to be
100% accurate. Movies about Buffalo Bill and Wyatt Earp were not
accurate either. They were never meant to be. One of the worst was
Henry Fonda as Wyatt Earp in "My Darling Clementine." That was a great
John Ford western. They are movies, gentleman and ladies, movies.
JB
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"ALL" movies based on Historical Events use "Artistic License".
To compress years/months/days into a 2/3 hour movie.
HOWEVER;
Oliver Stone's "JFK" was the First/Only movie Totally Vilified/Lambasted by
Gov't/Media
BEFORE it was even released to the Theaters ! ! !
That movie is Closer to the evidence/testimony in the 26 volumes than the
"conclusions" of the WCR ! ! !
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/
Until you've read the evidence/testimony in the 26 volumes, you'll NEVER
know which side is Lying to you ! ! !
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/radio_debate.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JLeyd...@aol.com
> Until you've read the evidence/testimony in the 26 volumes, you'll >NEVER know which side is Lying to you ! ! !
Well, I can get a pretty good idea from looking at the cast of
characters involved on each side. I wouldn't trust people like Lane,
Marrs, Weisberg or Stone to pick up my dry cleaning. You either.
JGL
>
> In case McAdams don't post this one;
>
> "John Blubaugh" <jbluba...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:dda3e086-62d9-47d2...@p19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 19, 9:15 am, yeuhd <needleswax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 18, 10:28 pm, b garrett meadows <bgarrettmead...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Any comments on the veracity of the movie?
>
> > It posits an Oswald-was-innocent theory, which loses all credibility
> > right there. Trumbo was a member of the Communist Party USA in 1943-
> > 1948, and was aligned with the party for many years before that, so
> > it's not surprising that he makes the conspirators industrial fat cats
> > who want their defense contracts expanded via Vietnam. And for added
> > villainy, they oppose Kennedy's civil rights agenda too.
>
> Dalton Trumbo was a great artist and the movie is representative of
> some well known theories. However, it is just a movie not a
> documentary. It is meant for intertainment and it does that well. LNs
> are hilarious about movies like this and JFK that they expect to be
> 100% accurate. Movies about Buffalo Bill and Wyatt Earp were not
> accurate either. They were never meant to be. One of the worst was
> Henry Fonda as Wyatt Earp in "My Darling Clementine." That was a great
> John Ford western. They are movies, gentleman and ladies, movies.
>
> JB
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�--------------------------------------------
>
> "ALL" movies based on Historical Events use "Artistic License".
>
> To compress years/months/days into a 2/3 hour movie.
>
> HOWEVER;
> Oliver Stone's "JFK" was the First/Only movie Totally Vilified/Lambasted by
> Gov't/Media
> BEFORE it was even released to the Theaters ! ! !
>
> That movie is Closer to the evidence/testimony in the 26 volumes than the
> "conclusions" of the WCR ! ! !
>
> SEE>>> �http://whokilledjfk.net/
>
> Until you've read the evidence/testimony in the 26 volumes, you'll NEVER
> know which side is Lying to you ! ! !
>
> SEE>>> �http://whokilledjfk.net/radio_debate.htm
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�------------------------------------------------
tomnln
You don't have the intelligence to debate your position.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/invitation.htm
Keep RUNNIN leyden !
<JLeyd...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:6188591d-67f7-4bb4...@j35g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
Robert Harris
Did you post a link to your site awhile back, to an article in which
someone claimed he talked with Hosty, who was complaining that Oswald
wasn't being a productive informant?
If so, could you repost that link?
Thanks
Robert Harris
In article <6eENm.19620$We2....@newsfe09.iad>,
tomnln
"Robert Harris" <reha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:reharris1-96C9C...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net...
Robert Harris
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/fbi_hosty.htm
Actually, I think it was a different article. I think this is one which
you said the HSCA buried. The guy said Hosty claimed Oswald wasn't being
very productive as an informant.
Robert Harris
tomnln
Whatever you find, you can copy.
"Robert Harris" <reha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:reharris1-8C3A8...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net...