Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Questions for the Kooks (#1)

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Bud

unread,
Feb 22, 2007, 12:45:36 PM2/22/07
to

Can any kook support Oswald`s claim that he taken in because he had
been to the Soviet Union? Can they show that any of the arresting
officers were even aware of this?

aeffects

unread,
Feb 22, 2007, 1:55:34 PM2/22/07
to


looks like no 'Lone Nutters' are biting, Dudster

Bud

unread,
Feb 22, 2007, 2:08:27 PM2/22/07
to

These questions won`t go away just because you duck them, stoner.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Feb 22, 2007, 10:39:04 PM2/22/07
to
In article <1172170534....@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>, aeffects
says...

I wonder... shouldn't LNT'ers have to document their claim before they demand an
answer?

A stenographer's transcript would do fine...

aeffects

unread,
Feb 23, 2007, 12:08:17 AM2/23/07
to
On Feb 22, 7:39 pm, Ben Holmes <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote:
> In article <1172170534.468747.67...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>, aeffects


what a incredible concept....LNer's citing and/or quoting in support
of a claim... hell, they'd have to become accurate, cease fabricating
facts, etc....

Bud

unread,
Feb 23, 2007, 2:05:20 AM2/23/07
to

I thought the cowards would run from these questions. They won`t go
away.

> A stenographer's transcript would do fine...

And denial is a river in Egypt. Answer the question, or confirm
your cowardice.

Bud

unread,
Feb 23, 2007, 2:09:39 AM2/23/07
to

aeffects wrote:
> On Feb 22, 7:39 pm, Ben Holmes <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote:
> > In article <1172170534.468747.67...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>, aeffects
> > says...
> >
> >
> >
> > >On Feb 22, 9:45 am, "Bud" <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
> > >> Can any kook support Oswald`s claim that he taken in because he had
> > >> been to the Soviet Union? Can they show that any of the arresting
> > >> officers were even aware of this?
> >
> > >looks like no 'Lone Nutters' are biting, Dudster
> >
> > I wonder... shouldn't LNT'ers have to document their claim before they demand an
> > answer?
> >
> > A stenographer's transcript would do fine...
>
>
> what a incredible concept...

What, you kooks answering the question?

>.LNer's citing and/or quoting in support
> of a claim...

Don`t know about the claim that Oswald made to reporters? Perhaps
you should get up to speed on the evidence.

> hell, they'd have to become accurate, cease fabricating
> facts, etc....

So far, a lot of dancing, and no answering. Why are CT so afraid
of the facts in this case?

Walt

unread,
Feb 23, 2007, 7:58:36 AM2/23/07
to
> of the facts in this case?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

So Oswald claimed he was fingered because he'd been to Russia....

Whose ears did he hope to reach with that message?

I believe he also said.... " I do request that "SOMEBODY" come to my
legal defense"...

Whose ears did he hope to reach with that message?

He placed a long distant call to "SOMEBODY" at about 7:00 pm that
evening and talked to that "SOMEBODY" for about a half hour. Do you
think he was discussing the weather? Or maybe he was discussing the
Cowboys in the playoffs?

Walt

Bud

unread,
Feb 23, 2007, 2:02:07 PM2/23/07
to

No, not fingered, that was Freddy. Oz claimed he had been taken in
because of his trip to the Soviet Union. My question was whether any
of you kooks can support his assertion. So far, none have. I`m sure it
has something to do with fear and cowardice that leads the kooks
running from the evidence.

> Whose ears did he hope to reach with that message?

Doesn`t have anything to do with the question I asked. Is Oswalds
statement supportable?

> I believe he also said.... " I do request that "SOMEBODY" come to my
> legal defense"...
>
> Whose ears did he hope to reach with that message?
>
> He placed a long distant call to "SOMEBODY" at about 7:00 pm that
> evening and talked to that "SOMEBODY" for about a half hour. Do you
> think he was discussing the weather? Or maybe he was discussing the
> Cowboys in the playoffs?

When your mind gets done wandering and wondering, maybe you can
focus it on the question I asked. It is an option to admit if you
can`t support Oz`s claim.

> Walt

Walt

unread,
Feb 23, 2007, 2:28:46 PM2/23/07
to

Ok.... When was Oswald supposed to have said that he been taken in
because he had
been to the Soviet Union? It seems like I've heard he said that to
Captain Fritz but I'm not sure. I don't understand why you think
this is so important.

Since Oswald was a trained intelligence agent he could send messages
to his handler in photographs and by making public statements that
didn't make much sense to the casual listener.

Immediately after FG Powers was shot down over the Soviet Union Oswald
sent a photo home from Russia that appears innocuous to the casual
observer, but to his handler he sent the message that he had revealed
nothing about the U-2.
His handler sent him messages disguised as ordinary documents....
Example ... Shortly after Oswald arrived in Minsk he received a new
draft card.....It was signed by Gut Schieffer... (German for --Good
Sailor ) It was his handler's way of telling him he was pleased with
Oswald's success of infiltrating the USSR.


Walt

>
>
>
> > Walt- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

Bud

unread,
Feb 23, 2007, 3:03:00 PM2/23/07
to

In the hallway of the police station, in response to question being
shouted to him by reporters.

> It seems like I've heard he said that to
> Captain Fritz but I'm not sure.

A reporteter asked Oz "Did you kill the President?" Oz replied "No,
they`ve taken me in because of the fact that I lived in the Soviet
Union. I`m just a patsy."

> I don't understand why you think
> this is so important.

I don`t think it is particularily important. I just know you kooks
can`t supprt Oz`s claim that the reason he was taken in was because he
had lived in the Soviet Union. It`s the same tactic Ben uses in his
questions, it`s turnabouts, and it`s fair play. Now, can any kook
support Oz`s claim as to why he was picked up, or are they merely
cowards afraid of the evidence?

> Since Oswald was a trained intelligence agent he could send messages
> to his handler in photographs and by making public statements that
> didn't make much sense to the casual listener.

Luckily, there are kooks available, to act as translators. Of
course, I must do what Ben demands with his questions, that you
support you contentions with cites from the evidence.

> Immediately after FG Powers was shot down over the Soviet Union Oswald
> sent a photo home from Russia that appears innocuous to the casual
> observer, but to his handler he sent the message that he had revealed
> nothing about the U-2.
> His handler sent him messages disguised as ordinary documents....
> Example ... Shortly after Oswald arrived in Minsk he received a new
> draft card.....It was signed by Gut Schieffer... (German for --Good
> Sailor ) It was his handler's way of telling him he was pleased with
> Oswald's success of infiltrating the USSR.

I see, you think I asked for random thoughts off the top of your
head, not the answer to a specific question.

0 new messages