Rosstards Admits To Being "Running Scared Embarrassed !
cdddraftsman
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> On Nov 6, 5:06 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> > The only thing Missing from John's website is the debate I did with him.
> > SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/radio_debate.htm
> Stop flattering yourself into thinking there was anything earth-
> shattering in that debate. You simply made the same old tired
> conspiratorial arguments that have been circulating for decades - most of
> which I didn't realize anybody with any knowledge of this case still
> adopted.
> You did not raise any original points that are not already addressed on
> John's website.
> C'mon - the Oswald in the doorway thing? Pfft! Are you kidding me?
> The Mauser on the 6th floor thing? Asked and answered! Geez.
> Putting that debate on the website would be nothing more than a novelty -
> but it was hardly scholarly.
> It's almost comical how you thought that was some major achievement for
> you. Just in YOUR world, Tom. In OUR world (you know, the one where the
> sky is blue and the sun rises in the east and sets in the west), that
> debate only served to illustrate how dogmatic and wild your theories were.
> It also illustrated a certain rigid, impractical, and irrational side of
> you: i.e. "Why didn't they prosecute him/her for perjury?" Ridiculous!
> I hate to pop your bubble, but that debate hardly represented a seminal
> moment in the JFK assassination debate. I'm sure Professor McAdams would
> agree with me on that.
> But I'm sure you enjoyed playing the game.
> David Emerling
> Memphis, TN
Good post . I've pointed out to tomnln repeatedly that the 'Warren
Report'
* is crammed stem to stern with invocations , incantations and
superflorous citations indicating conspiracy because of it's 'Report'
nature that includes innuendo , contradictions , mistakes ,
fabrications
and hearsay evidence and testimony retained as a contemporanous record
of
those four days . Lost on him ? More like avoided at all costs . Did
he
research my claims further ? He went on a seek and avoid mission .
The time to look for a cover-up is when evidence and testimony all
jives
completely , AND NOT THE OPPOSITE ! Not surprising seeing he has no
investigative skills , no resources to verify his contrieved
conspiracy
and he doesn't care to correct this 5000 Ib white elephant swaying
back
and forth in his living room . All this he conveniently ignores as
the
derilect vessel JFK Conspiracy has sprung a thousand leaks , is
slowly
being abandoned by women and children first , and I suspect tomnln is
the
captain that will leave last . A bitter end to a story that 'died of
a
theory' **.
tl
Keynotes :
* WR denied as evidence of 'no conspiracy' by the defence in the Jim
Garrison persecution trial of Clay Shaw . Denied immediately as
"inadmissible" due to being ruled "hearsay" .
** The theory is simple in it's logical absurdity and breathtaking in
it's
scope : In a nutshell : It took 46 years to reach a conclusion that
JFK
was killed by many different people , for many different reasons and
in
many different ways and this happened ALL AT THE SAME TIME ? In short
conspiracy literature constitutes the largest body of fraudulent work
ever
created that has caused the largest mass failure in thinking ever
recorded
by humans any one given subject . This part , I'm sure tomnln is an
expert
in .
tomnln
The only thing Missing from John's website is the debate I did with him.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/radio_debate.htm
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Adding Insult to Fatal Injury>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tom_lowery.htm
"cdddraftsman" <cdddra...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:18798817-657e-443a...@x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...