Jason Burke - Kook Extraordinaire - Runs Away...

[Ben Holmes]

Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum.

The kook asserted that my 45 Questions were "blown totally out of the water
YEARS ago." - yet, refuses to supply even *one* example of any such thing.


In article <jpes3...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>
>In article <jpcrds$nbt$8...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>>On 5/20/2012 11:13 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>> In article<jp8vv3$ifq$1...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>>>
>>>> On 5/19/2012 7:05 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>>> In article<jp6mk3$g74$1...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/18/2012 4:32 PM, aeffects wrote:
>>>>>>> On May 16, 8:38 pm, Len Colby<lenbraz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>EFhttp://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19083http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19099http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19089http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19084
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Apparently there are similar threads on Lancer and the DPF
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> perhaps Len instead of advertising you can do the 45 questions,
>>>>>>> 'search this group' is your friend? Can you do what lone nut regulars
>>>>>>> around here FAILED to do?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh, all 45 of your ridiculous questions were blown totally out of the
>>>>>> water YEARS ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Come up with some more nonsense. Please?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The 45 Questions are reposted annually - if they had been "blown totally
>>>>> out of the water" - then why doesn't someone simply provide the quote of
>>>>> someone 'blowing it out of the water'?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to where it
>>>>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I realize that in *this* forum, most people will accept what you said.
>>>>>
>>>>> But just for the benefit of the few lurkers who are more critical, can you
>>>>> support what you stated with citations?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure thing. I'll do your research for ya. Post 'em again, and I'll take
>>>> the five minutes to send pointers to the posts where each and every one
>>>> of them was shown to be nonsense.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to where it
>>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>>>
>>> If you have trouble finding them, the title in all of them contain the
>>> words "The 45 Questions".
>>>
>>> I suspect my *next* response will be censored for "badgering".
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Yawn. Holmes, you got nothing. And you know it. Sad.
>>I see you didn't bother posting the questions again. Guess it'd be too
>>embarrassing, eh?
>
>
>It's not *me* that needs to have anything.
>
>You made a claim, now you can't cite for it or support it.
>
>That alone tells the tale.

Just another post to point out that the original poster claimed that my 45
Questions had been "blown totally out of the water", yet he cannot seem to
provide a link to any of these refutations.

It's simple to find any such refutations - here's the search link to help
the original poster:

http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2012&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2012&as_ugroup=alt.conspiracy.jfk&as_usubject=45+Questions+-+One+by+One&as_uauthors=Ben+Holmes&safe=off


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com

[aeffects]

On May 25, 6:56 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum.
>
> The kook asserted that my 45 Questions were "blown totally out of the water
> YEARS ago." - yet, refuses to supply even *one* example of any such thing.
>

> In article <jpes3p0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <jpcrds$nb...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...

>
> >>On 5/20/2012 11:13 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:

> >>> In article<jp8vv3$if...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...

>
> >>>> On 5/19/2012 7:05 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:

> >>>>> In article<jp6mk3$g7...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...

>
> >>>>>> On 5/18/2012 4:32 PM, aeffects wrote:
> >>>>>>> On May 16, 8:38 pm, Len Colby<lenbraz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>>>>>>>EFhttp://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19083http://edu...

lmao! the troll has to post 'something', he's still in that
"impress" .john mcadams stage, he'll get past it, maybe 5-10 years
down the road. then of course fade into that ever present WCR retard
pit!

> It's simple to find any such refutations - here's the search link to help
> the original poster:
>

> http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&nu...

[Jason Burke]

Yawn.

Cherry-pick shit from the newsgroup, as usual. I know all 45 have been
refuted, you KNOW all 45 have been refuted, hell, EVERYONE knows all 45
have been refuted.

Now just why on earth should I waste my time pulling up the cites? If
you weren't such a pussy, you'd do it yourself and see just what an
asswipe you're being. Hell, you probably LIKE being an asswipe. Guess
that's what fuckheads like you do when they have absolutely nothing
resembling evidence.

Yawn.

[Bill Clarke]

In article <jpo32...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...

>
>
>Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum.
>
>The kook asserted that my 45 Questions were "blown totally out of the water
>YEARS ago." - yet, refuses to supply even *one* example of any such thing.

You should know about being blown out of the water and running away, Benny. I'm
loving it.

Bill Clarke

[Ben Holmes]

In article <6b1d4949-b68e-4e51...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...

>
>On May 25, 6:56=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum.
>>

>> The kook asserted that my 45 Questions were "blown totally out of the wat=
>er
>> YEARS ago." - yet, refuses to supply even *one* example of any such thing=

>.
>>
>> In article <jpes3p0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>> >In article <jpcrds$nb...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>> >>On 5/20/2012 11:13 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> >>> In article<jp8vv3$if...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>> >>>> On 5/19/2012 7:05 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> >>>>> In article<jp6mk3$g7...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>> >>>>>> On 5/18/2012 4:32 PM, aeffects wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On May 16, 8:38 pm, Len Colby<lenbraz...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>EFhttp://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3D19083ht=

>tp://edu...
>>
>> >>>>>>>> Apparently there are similar threads on Lancer and the DPF
>>
>> >>>>>>> perhaps Len instead of advertising you can do the 45 questions,

>> >>>>>>> 'search this group' is your friend? Can you do what lone nut regu=

>lars
>> >>>>>>> around here FAILED to do?
>>

>> >>>>>> Uh, all 45 of your ridiculous questions were blown totally out of =

>the
>> >>>>>> water YEARS ago.
>>
>> >>>>>> Come up with some more nonsense. Please?
>>

>> >>>>> The 45 Questions are reposted annually - if they had been "blown to=
>tally
>> >>>>> out of the water" - then why doesn't someone simply provide the quo=

>te of
>> >>>>> someone 'blowing it out of the water'?
>>

>> >>>>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to wh=

>ere it
>> >>>>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>>

>> >>>>> I realize that in *this* forum, most people will accept what you sa=
>id.
>>
>> >>>>> But just for the benefit of the few lurkers who are more critical, =

>can you
>> >>>>> support what you stated with citations?
>>

>> >>>> Sure thing. I'll do your research for ya. Post 'em again, and I'll t=
>ake
>> >>>> the five minutes to send pointers to the posts where each and every =

>one
>> >>>> of them was shown to be nonsense.
>>

>> >>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to wher=

>e it
>> >>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>>

>> >>> If you have trouble finding them, the title in all of them contain th=

>e
>> >>> words "The 45 Questions".
>>
>> >>> I suspect my *next* response will be censored for "badgering".
>>
>> >>Yawn. Holmes, you got nothing. And you know it. Sad.
>> >>I see you didn't bother posting the questions again. Guess it'd be too
>> >>embarrassing, eh?
>>
>> >It's not *me* that needs to have anything.
>>
>> >You made a claim, now you can't cite for it or support it.
>>
>> >That alone tells the tale.
>>

>> Just another post to point out that the original poster claimed that my 4=
>5
>> Questions had been "blown totally out of the water", yet he cannot seem t=

>o
>> provide a link to any of these refutations.
>
>lmao! the troll has to post 'something', he's still in that
>"impress" .john mcadams stage, he'll get past it, maybe 5-10 years
>down the road. then of course fade into that ever present WCR retard
>pit!

And *here*, I can point out the truth, that the kook ran away, and can't defend
his lies with any cites or quotes...

In the censored forum, that isn't allowed.

Indeed, I can't even point out that he hasn't answered more than once or twice,
any more than that will be censored for "badgering".

>> It's simple to find any such refutations - here's the search link to help
>> the original poster:
>>

>> http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=3D&as_epq=3D&as_oq=3D&as_eq=
>=3D&nu...

[Ben Holmes]

In article <jpotc...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...

>
>In article <jpo32...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>>
>>Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum.
>>
>>The kook asserted that my 45 Questions were "blown totally out of the water
>>YEARS ago." - yet, refuses to supply even *one* example of any such thing.
>
>
>You should know about being blown out of the water and running away, Benny. I'm
>loving it.
>
>Bill Clarke

Still the coward, eh Billy?

[Jason Burke]

On 5/25/2012 7:25 PM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> In article<6b1d4949-b68e-4e51...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,

Geez, are you both vying for Stupidest Fuck on the Planet? It's a real
close call.

[aeffects]

On May 25, 8:02 pm, Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 5/25/2012 7:25 PM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > In article<6b1d4949-b68e-4e51-b328-38691f4af...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,

c'mon on now trog-lo-dike, you're sensitive these days, that's not the
Paul May we've come to know and love, ya dumbshit!

[aeffects]

On May 25, 2:25 pm, Bill Clarke <Bill_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <jpo32u01...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...

>
>
>
> >Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum.
>
> >The kook asserted that my 45 Questions were "blown totally out of the water
> >YEARS ago." - yet, refuses to supply even *one* example of any such thing.
>
> You should know about being blown out of the water and running away, Benny.  I'm
> loving it.

uh-huh! sure you are.... best thing to happen to the CT cause recently
is YOU. nutters suckered you in, thought you'd be outta here in a few
weeks and lookey here, its been months, you've spent your
alt.vietnam.war goodwill and now you're stuck... gotta read the
evidence, bill'o -- the nutters here can't back you up they don't know
case evidence.... what are you going to do?

> Bill Clarke
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <jpes3p0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>
> >>In article <jpcrds$nb...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...

>
> >>>On 5/20/2012 11:13 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:

> >>>> In article<jp8vv3$if...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...

>
> >>>>> On 5/19/2012 7:05 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:

> >>>>>> In article<jp6mk3$g7...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...

>
> >>>>>>> On 5/18/2012 4:32 PM, aeffects wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On May 16, 8:38 pm, Len Colby<lenbraz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>EFhttp://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19083http://edu...

> >http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&nu...

[timstter]

On May 26, 12:25 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <6b1d4949-b68e-4e51-b328-38691f4af...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,

So you should be, you KOOK!

You are simply a research fraud, just like your lying hero, Mark Lane,
Holmes.

Hey Holmes, does it bother you at all that the KGB liked Lane's work
SO MUCH that they made sure that some funding reached him at the
height of the Cold War?

Well given the way that you and Healy drape yourselves in the American
flag at any opportunity I think it SHOULD concern you the next time
you try to make PATHETIC excuses for Lane's lies re the murder of a US
President by an openly avowed Marxist, Lee Harvey Oswald.

You are a fraud on every level, Holmes!

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

[Jason Burke]

Let's see. You're too stupid to know I'm not Paul May. You've got no
evidence that anyone other than Oz was involved.

Oh, yeah, YOU HAVE PROVED CONSPIRACY.

So far, you're in the lead for Stupidest Fuck on the Planet!

But not by much.

[Ben Holmes]

In article <cf07424b-8de8-476e...@ri8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...

>
>On May 25, 8:02=A0pm, Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 5/25/2012 7:25 PM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>

>> > In article<6b1d4949-b68e-4e51-b328-38691f4af...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroup=
>s.com>,
>> > aeffects says...
>>
>> >> On May 25, 6:56=3DA0am, Ben Holmes<ad...@burningknife.com> =A0wrote:

>> >>> Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum.
>>

>> >>> The kook asserted that my 45 Questions were "blown totally out of the=
> wat=3D
>> >> er
>> >>> YEARS ago." - yet, refuses to supply even *one* example of any such t=
>hing=3D

>> >> .
>>
>> >>> In article<jpes3p0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>> >>>> In article<jpcrds$nb...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>> >>>>> On 5/20/2012 11:13 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> >>>>>> In article<jp8vv3$if...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>> >>>>>>> On 5/19/2012 7:05 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> In article<jp6mk3$g7...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/18/2012 4:32 PM, aeffects wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>> On May 16, 8:38 pm, Len Colby<lenbraz...@gmail.com> =A0wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> EFhttp://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3D3D1=
>9083ht=3D

>> >> tp://edu...
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Apparently there are similar threads on Lancer and the DPF
>>

>> >>>>>>>>>> perhaps Len instead of advertising you can do the 45 questions=
>,
>> >>>>>>>>>> 'search this group' is your friend? Can you do what lone nut r=
>egu=3D

>> >> lars
>> >>>>>>>>>> around here FAILED to do?
>>

>> >>>>>>>>> Uh, all 45 of your ridiculous questions were blown totally out =
>of =3D

>> >> the
>> >>>>>>>>> water YEARS ago.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Come up with some more nonsense. Please?
>>

>> >>>>>>>> The 45 Questions are reposted annually - if they had been "blown=
> to=3D
>> >> tally
>> >>>>>>>> out of the water" - then why doesn't someone simply provide the =
>quo=3D

>> >> te of
>> >>>>>>>> someone 'blowing it out of the water'?
>>

>> >>>>>>>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to=
> wh=3D

>> >> ere it
>> >>>>>>>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>>

>> >>>>>>>> I realize that in *this* forum, most people will accept what you=
> sa=3D
>> >> id.
>>
>> >>>>>>>> But just for the benefit of the few lurkers who are more critica=
>l, =3D

>> >> can you
>> >>>>>>>> support what you stated with citations?
>>

>> >>>>>>> Sure thing. I'll do your research for ya. Post 'em again, and I'l=
>l t=3D
>> >> ake
>> >>>>>>> the five minutes to send pointers to the posts where each and eve=
>ry =3D

>> >> one
>> >>>>>>> of them was shown to be nonsense.
>>

>> >>>>>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to w=
>her=3D

>> >> e it
>> >>>>>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>>

>> >>>>>> If you have trouble finding them, the title in all of them contain=
> th=3D

>> >> e
>> >>>>>> words "The 45 Questions".
>>
>> >>>>>> I suspect my *next* response will be censored for "badgering".
>>
>> >>>>> Yawn. Holmes, you got nothing. And you know it. Sad.

>> >>>>> I see you didn't bother posting the questions again. Guess it'd be =

>too
>> >>>>> embarrassing, eh?
>>
>> >>>> It's not *me* that needs to have anything.
>>
>> >>>> You made a claim, now you can't cite for it or support it.
>>
>> >>>> That alone tells the tale.
>>

>> >>> Just another post to point out that the original poster claimed that =
>my 4=3D
>> >> 5
>> >>> Questions had been "blown totally out of the water", yet he cannot se=
>em t=3D

>> >> o
>> >>> provide a link to any of these refutations.
>>
>> >> lmao! the troll has to post 'something', he's still in that
>> >> "impress" .john mcadams stage, he'll get past it, maybe 5-10 years
>> >> down the road. then of course fade into that ever present WCR retard
>> >> pit!
>>

>> > And *here*, I can point out the truth, that the kook ran away, and can'=

>t defend
>> > his lies with any cites or quotes...
>>
>> > In the censored forum, that isn't allowed.
>>

>> > Indeed, I can't even point out that he hasn't answered more than once o=

>r twice,
>> > any more than that will be censored for "badgering".
>>

>> >>> It's simple to find any such refutations - here's the search link to =
>help
>> >>> the original poster:
>>
>> >>>http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=3D3D&as_epq=3D3D&as_oq=3D3=
>D&as_eq=3D
>> >> =3D3D&nu...

>>
>> Geez, are you both vying for Stupidest Fuck on the Planet? It's a real
>> close call.
>
>c'mon on now trog-lo-dike, you're sensitive these days, that's not the
>Paul May we've come to know and love, ya dumbshit!

Ah! The "Kook Extraordinaire" can't wait to demonstrate yet again his refusal to
even *try* to cite an example that supports his claim.

And to demonstrate the accuracy and truthfulness of my post, the kook runs to ad
hominem.

[Ben Holmes]

In article <821eb14d-a79f-4ae9...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...

>
>On May 25, 2:25=A0pm, Bill Clarke <Bill_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <jpo32u01...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>>
>>
>> >Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum.
>>

>> >The kook asserted that my 45 Questions were "blown totally out of the wa=
>ter
>> >YEARS ago." - yet, refuses to supply even *one* example of any such thin=
>g.
>>
>> You should know about being blown out of the water and running away, Benn=
>y. =A0I'm

>> loving it.
>
>uh-huh! sure you are.... best thing to happen to the CT cause recently
>is YOU. nutters suckered you in, thought you'd be outta here in a few
>weeks and lookey here, its been months, you've spent your
>alt.vietnam.war goodwill and now you're stuck... gotta read the
>evidence, bill'o -- the nutters here can't back you up they don't know
>case evidence.... what are you going to do?

Yeah, Billy can't provide an example either. He doesn't know enough about the
evidence to understand who's right.

Of course, his natural cowardice isn't helping either...

>> Bill Clarke
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >In article <jpes3p0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>> >>In article <jpcrds$nb...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>> >>>On 5/20/2012 11:13 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> >>>> In article<jp8vv3$if...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>> >>>>> On 5/19/2012 7:05 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> >>>>>> In article<jp6mk3$g7...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>>
>> >>>>>>> On 5/18/2012 4:32 PM, aeffects wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On May 16, 8:38 pm, Len Colby<lenbraz...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>EFhttp://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3D19083h=

>ttp://edu...
>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Apparently there are similar threads on Lancer and the DPF
>>
>> >>>>>>>> perhaps Len instead of advertising you can do the 45 questions,

>> >>>>>>>> 'search this group' is your friend? Can you do what lone nut reg=

>ulars
>> >>>>>>>> around here FAILED to do?
>>

>> >>>>>>> Uh, all 45 of your ridiculous questions were blown totally out of=

> the
>> >>>>>>> water YEARS ago.
>>
>> >>>>>>> Come up with some more nonsense. Please?
>>

>> >>>>>> The 45 Questions are reposted annually - if they had been "blown t=
>otally
>> >>>>>> out of the water" - then why doesn't someone simply provide the qu=

>ote of
>> >>>>>> someone 'blowing it out of the water'?
>>

>> >>>>>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to w=

>here it
>> >>>>>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>>

>> >>>>>> I realize that in *this* forum, most people will accept what you s=
>aid.
>>
>> >>>>>>But just for the benefit of the few lurkers who are more critical, =

>can you
>> >>>>>> support what you stated with citations?
>>

>> >>>>> Sure thing. I'll do your research for ya. Post 'em again, and I'll =
>take
>> >>>>> the five minutes to send pointers to the posts where each and every=

> one
>> >>>>> of them was shown to be nonsense.
>>

>> >>>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to whe=

>re it
>> >>>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>>

>> >>>> If you have trouble finding them, the title in all of them contain t=

>he
>> >>>> words "The 45 Questions".
>>
>> >>>> I suspect my *next* response will be censored for "badgering".
>>
>> >>>Yawn. Holmes, you got nothing. And you know it. Sad.
>> >>>I see you didn't bother posting the questions again. Guess it'd be too
>> >>>embarrassing, eh?
>>
>> >>It's not *me* that needs to have anything.
>>
>> >>You made a claim, now you can't cite for it or support it.
>>
>> >>That alone tells the tale.
>>

>> >Just another post to point out that the original poster claimed that my =
>45
>> >Questions had been "blown totally out of the water", yet he cannot seem =

>to
>> >provide a link to any of these refutations.
>>

>> >It's simple to find any such refutations - here's the search link to hel=

>p
>> >the original poster:
>>
>> >http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=3D&as_epq=3D&as_oq=3D&as_eq=
>=3D&nu...
>

[Jason Burke]

On 5/26/2012 8:30 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> In article<cf07424b-8de8-476e...@ri8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

Yawn.

Are you just retarded? Or do you need to move up a few steps to get to
retarded?

[aeffects]

On May 26, 11:15 am, Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 5/26/2012 8:30 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > In article<cf07424b-8de8-476e-9fe0-9d5b5543a...@ri8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

there you are, all dressed up in yell'ER', knew I'd recognize ya, Paul
May (aka Jason Burker-Mark Ulrik)! Why are you running so much, are we
keeping you out of breath, or what? run sweet gloria, RUN!

[aeffects]

is your cowardly ass still floating around here? when are you going to
earn that stipend? just curious.... ROTFLMFAO! ! ! !

[Jason Burke]

I was correct, babycakes. You ARE that fucking retarded.

[Jason Burke]

Again with the rolling and the ass, fuckface? Try wiping next time.
Though you probably like SHITTING in your pants and leaving it there, huh?

[timstter]

Another clown who has no problem with the fact that Mark Lane's Anti-
American lies were assisted by KGB funding.

Why don't you bore us again with a story of what a hero you are, Dave?

Personally I think you and Holmes are traitors, making excuses for the
likes of Lane.

[aeffects]

you look mav-e-lous, sweetlips.... know OFF you knees, you got work to
do!

[aeffects]

methinks you fall prey to commie-pinko, KGB, the dog ate my homework
nonsense, way too much..... ROTFLMFAO! ! ! !

> Why don't you bore us again with a story of what a hero you are, Dave?
>
> Personally I think you and Holmes are traitors, making excuses for the
> likes of Lane.

discussions about a traitord from a draft-dodging, over weight,
standup comic wannabe, loser? Is that the best you can do on a JFK
assassination board. Whatever the disinfo agents are paying you
fuckwad it's too much....

[Jason Burke]

All the work was done almost 50 years ago, shithead. And they got it
right. You douchebags have absolutely nothing after 50 years, sweetcheeks.

(I KNOW you like sweetcheeks. All that time rolling around in them, huh?)

[tom...@cox.net]

json dosn't know the differance between refuted and "Denial like any other
junkie/alchy.

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

[tom...@cox.net]

jason hs been RUNNINGH FROM TOMNLN FOR YEARS.

SEE> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm

SEE> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/invitation.htm

[tom...@cox.net]

OF THE HOUSANDS OF POST BY JASON THERE HA NEVER BEEN A SINLE POST ADRESSING
EVIDENCE/TESTIMOY. LOOKS LIK HE DOESN'T PLACE VALIDITY ON HIS WARREN
COMMISION AFTER ALL.

[tom...@cox.net]

TOMNLN IS ALWAYS RIGHT JASON NEVER QUOTES ANY EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY.

HEVEN HE KNOWS THE EPORT IS FULL OF SHIT.

[aeffects]

On May 26, 10:23 pm, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > On 5/26/2012 8:30 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > > In

> > > article<cf07424b-8de8-476e-9fe0-9d5b5543a...@ri8g2000pbc.googlegroups.c

that's a lone nut trait featured here (thousands of none JFK
assassination related posts), they're all dumb as stumps... the fools
can't even deal with the 45 questions, pathetic. R-O-T-F-L-M-F-A-
O! ! ! ! !

> --
> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------

[aeffects]

On May 26, 10:21 pm, tom...@cox.net wrote:

> Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > On 5/25/2012 7:25 PM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > > In

> > > article<6b1d4949-b68e-4e51-b328-38691f4af...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.c

Jason Burke aka Paul May...

[Jason Burke]

sdfayt asdg6723n 9i23hftysa SHYGT, Rosstard?

[Jason Burke]

Ah, Rosstard. You're close, but you've still got a way to go before even
thinking of running for 'Stupidest Fuck on the Planet'. The H & H boys
are still way ahead of you.

But maybe you can catch up!

[Jason Burke]

Yawn. Still have no evidence, eh, Rossfuck?

[Jason Burke]

Heck, at least the dumbfuck spelled his own handle correctly this time.

[Jason Burke]

Wow, your ass must be in a lot of pain. But I'm sure you like that.

[Jason Burke]

Oh, yay, I'm Paul May again!

No wonder you dumbfucks can't figure out a simple murder.

[aeffects]

On May 27, 8:13 am, Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 5/26/2012 10:23 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>  wrote:

> >> On 5/26/2012 8:30 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >>> In

> >>> article<cf07424b-8de8-476e-9fe0-9d5b5543a...@ri8g2000pbc.googlegroups.c

so where is that lone nut coward Jason Burke (aka Paul May Mark Ulrik)
pussy disappeared.... ROTFLMFAO! ! ! !

[Jason Burke]

Yawn. Still have any evidence, H&H boys?

How's that ass doing? Probably too much glass up it, fucktard.

[aeffects]

evidently there's enough evidence to keep you here shithead.... you
wait and wait and wait for a CT to post, so if there isn't enough
evidence here, what are YOU doing here, moron? cruising, looking for
dates? you sicko, you.

[tom...@cox.net]

jason;
You're an Illeterat Cunt ! ! !

[tom...@cox.net]

Jason is the QUEEN of chickenshits ! ! !

[tom...@cox.net]

Jason still practises Nazi Justice ! ! !

[tom...@cox.net]

Here's the correct spelling of YOURS< Chickenshit ! ! !

[Samantha Brown]

<tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:20120528204906.936$Z...@newsreader.com...

LOL. What a moron.

[Jason Burke]

Wow. Just wow.

[Jason Burke]

>> thinking of running for 'Stupidest Fuck on the Planet'. The H& H boys

>> are still way ahead of you.
>>
>> But maybe you can catch up!
> Jason is the QUEEN of chickenshits ! ! !
>

Holy crap! A readable *and* coherent sentence.

Good job, Rossshit! Those meds must be working.

[Jason Burke]

[tom...@cox.net]

SHOW US A PHOTO OF YOUR 26 VOLUMES.

OR, DID THEY GET LOST WITH THE tOWN cAR? ? ?

[tom...@cox.net]

NOW, IF WE CAN ONLY FIND SOME MEDS TO CURE YOUR NAZI BELIEFS/CHICKENSHIT..

[tom...@cox.net]

YOU OMMIE COCKSUCKER, YOU'RE STILL PRACTISING NAZI JUSTICE.

THE BURDON OF PROOF IS ON "YOU"

[Samantha Brown]

<tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:20120530005239.318$R...@newsreader.com...

KISS MY ASS YOU PATHETIC OLD PERVERT!

>
> OR, DID THEY GET LOST WITH THE tOWN cAR? ? ?

ELLEN'S ENTERTAINING THE FOOTBALL TEAM IN IT.

[timstter]

On May 27, 9:23 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 26, 3:26 pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 27, 6:10 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 26, 2:55 am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 26, 12:25 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > In article <6b1d4949-b68e-4e51-b328-38691f4af...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > aeffects says...

>
> > > > > >On May 25, 6:56=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum.
>

> > > > > >> The kook asserted that my 45 Questions were "blown totally out of the wat=
> > > > > >er
> > > > > >> YEARS ago." - yet, refuses to supply even *one* example of any such thing=

> > > > > >.
>
> > > > > >> In article <jpes3p0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>
> > > > > >> >In article <jpcrds$nb...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>
> > > > > >> >>On 5/20/2012 11:13 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > > > > >> >>> In article<jp8vv3$if...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>
> > > > > >> >>>> On 5/19/2012 7:05 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>> In article<jp6mk3$g7...@dont-email.me>, Jason Burke says...
>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> On 5/18/2012 4:32 PM, aeffects wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> On May 16, 8:38 pm, Len Colby<lenbraz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>EFhttp://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3D19083ht=

> > > > > >tp://edu...
>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Apparently there are similar threads on Lancer and the DPF
>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> perhaps Len instead of advertising you can do the 45 questions,

> > > > > >> >>>>>>> 'search this group' is your friend? Can you do what lone nut regu=

> > > > > >lars
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> around here FAILED to do?
>

> > > > > >> >>>>>> Uh, all 45 of your ridiculous questions were blown totally out of =

> > > > > >the
> > > > > >> >>>>>> water YEARS ago.
>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> Come up with some more nonsense. Please?
>

> > > > > >> >>>>> The 45 Questions are reposted annually - if they had been "blown to=
> > > > > >tally
> > > > > >> >>>>> out of the water" - then why doesn't someone simply provide the quo=

> > > > > >te of
> > > > > >> >>>>> someone 'blowing it out of the water'?
>

> > > > > >> >>>>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to wh=

> > > > > >ere it
> > > > > >> >>>>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>

> > > > > >> >>>>> I realize that in *this* forum, most people will accept what you sa=
> > > > > >id.
>
> > > > > >> >>>>> But just for the benefit of the few lurkers who are more critical, =

> > > > > >can you
> > > > > >> >>>>> support what you stated with citations?
>

> > > > > >> >>>> Sure thing. I'll do your research for ya. Post 'em again, and I'll t=
> > > > > >ake
> > > > > >> >>>> the five minutes to send pointers to the posts where each and every =

> > > > > >one
> > > > > >> >>>> of them was shown to be nonsense.
>

> > > > > >> >>> Can you pick *any* one of the 45 Questions and provide a link to wher=

> > > > > >e it
> > > > > >> >>> was "blown totally out of the water"?
>

> > > > > >> >>> If you have trouble finding them, the title in all of them contain th=

> > > > > >e
> > > > > >> >>> words "The 45 Questions".
>
> > > > > >> >>> I suspect my *next* response will be censored for "badgering".
>
> > > > > >> >>Yawn. Holmes, you got nothing. And you know it. Sad.
> > > > > >> >>I see you didn't bother posting the questions again. Guess it'd be too
> > > > > >> >>embarrassing, eh?
>
> > > > > >> >It's not *me* that needs to have anything.
>
> > > > > >> >You made a claim, now you can't cite for it or support it.
>
> > > > > >> >That alone tells the tale.
>

> > > > > >> Just another post to point out that the original poster claimed that my 4=
> > > > > >5
> > > > > >> Questions had been "blown totally out of the water", yet he cannot seem t=

> > > > > >o
> > > > > >> provide a link to any of these refutations.
>
> > > > > >lmao! the troll has to post 'something', he's still in that
> > > > > >"impress" .john mcadams stage, he'll get past it, maybe 5-10 years
> > > > > >down the road. then of course fade into that ever present WCR retard
> > > > > >pit!
>

> > > > > And *here*, I can point out the truth, that the kook ran away, and can't defend

> > > > > his lies with any cites or quotes...
>
> > > > > In the censored forum, that isn't allowed.
>

> > > > > Indeed, I can't even point out that he hasn't answered more than once or twice,
> > > > > any more than that will be censored for "badgering".

>
> > > > > >> It's simple to find any such refutations - here's the search link to help
> > > > > >> the original poster:
>

> > > > > >>http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=3D&as_epq=3D&as_oq=3D&as_eq=
> > > > > >=3D&nu...
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> > > > > Ben Holmes
> > > > > Learn to Make Money with a Website -http://www.burningknife.com
>

> > > > So you should be, you KOOK!
>
> > > > You are simply a research fraud, just like your lying hero, Mark Lane,
> > > > Holmes.
>
> > > > Hey Holmes, does it bother you at all that the KGB liked Lane's work
> > > > SO MUCH that they made sure that some funding reached him at the
> > > > height of the Cold War?
>
> > > > Well given the way that you and Healy drape yourselves in the American
> > > > flag at any opportunity I think it SHOULD concern you the next time
> > > > you try to make PATHETIC excuses for Lane's lies re the murder of a US
> > > > President by an openly avowed Marxist, Lee Harvey Oswald.
>
> > > > You are a fraud on every level, Holmes!
>
> > > is your cowardly ass still floating around here? when are you going to
> > > earn that stipend? just curious.... ROTFLMFAO! ! ! !
>
> > > > Informative Regards,
>
> > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> > Another clown who has no problem with the fact that Mark Lane's Anti-
> > American lies were assisted by KGB funding.
>
> methinks you fall prey to commie-pinko, KGB, the dog ate my homework
> nonsense, way too much..... ROTFLMFAO! ! ! !
>
> > Why don't you bore us again with a story of what a hero you are, Dave?
>
> > Personally I think you and Holmes are traitors, making excuses for the
> > likes of Lane.
>
> discussions about a traitord from a draft-dodging, over weight,
> standup comic wannabe, loser? Is that the best you can do on a JFK
> assassination board. Whatever the disinfo agents are paying you
> fuckwad it's too much....
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Informative Regards,
>
> > Tim Brennan
> > Sydney, Australia
> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

BUMP! YOO HOO! DAVE!

This would seem an OPPORTUNE time for you to front up with proof that
you served in Vietnam.

As it is, you and Holmes simply appear to like making excuses for the
KGB funded apologist for the clearly guilty Marxist murderer of the
President Of The United States.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head!
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[aeffects]

anytime you'd like to come to Las Vegas shithead let me know, to look
and verify my DD214 you'll need 10 grand USD... till then, keep
pulling Bill Clarkes pud.... smooches from the other side LMFAO!

<snip the loons nonsense>

[timstter]

How come we can Google Bill Clarke for FREE and see that he was a unit
commander in Vietnam but we have to pay $10K USD to verify that YOU
even served, Dave'o?

AND we have to put money up front to see Ben *Yelow Pants* Holmes's
DD214 as well.

What are you both hiding?

Hardly seems you are the US military patriots that you make out to be,
given your CONTINUAL excuses for the KGB funded apologist for the self-
confessed Marxist who murdered your Commander-In-Chief back in 1963.

Looks to me like you are both 100% REMF garrison types.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm