G.H.W.B at Dealey Plaza?
Richard
http://www.tomflocco.com/Docs/63/BushJfkBookDepo.htm
David Von Pein
Oh Lordy, not this shit again.
<massive sigh>
bigdog
> Oh Lordy, not this shit again.
>
> <massive sigh>
I think, he was at DP. Castro was there two. I saw a supermarket
tabloid that showed a blow up of a photograph and you could see Castro
as plain as day with a big smile on his face while JFK was being shot.
What more proof do you need?
tomnln
"bigdog" <jecorb...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7ba12613-99b8-49bb...@o33g2000vbu.googlegroups.com...
Typical mentality of LN's.
David Von Pein
>>> "Typical mentality of LN's." <<<
Indeed it is. With that mentality being:
Dismiss stupid shit that has no basis in fact whatsoever.
But the average "mentality" of a lot of conspiracy theorists is this
one:
Accept ALL unfounded rumors and hunks of speculation regarding the
murders of JFK, JDT, and LHO....regardless of origin, and regardless
of how silly and stupid-sounding these rumors happen to be.
Great case in point being: The backyard photographs of Lee Harvey
Oswald.
I don't think I'm wrong in saying that even a majority of CTers today
will readily admit that, in their mind, ONE of the backyard photos can
be considered a legitimate, real photo of Lee Oswald that was taken
with LHO's Imperial-Reflex camera in the Neely St. backyard sometime
in early 1963.
But then what do most of those same CTers proceed to do? --- They toss
their common sense out the nearest window and proceed to talk about
how the remaining backyard pics are NOT legit and have been "faked",
"forged", "manufactured", etc.
But in order to believe that one of the pictures is the real McCoy,
while at the same time believing the remainder of the photos are
fraudulent in some manner, a conspiracy theorist has to believe that
the people who were "plotting" to set up and frame Lee Harvey Oswald
for JFK's murder would have felt the need to fake ADDITIONAL PICTURES,
which depict something (LHO in the Neely St. backyard holding guns and
Russian newspapers) that was already depicted in a REAL AND LEGITIMATE
PHOTOGRAPH.
And when confronted with the logical question of "WHY WOULD ANYONE
WANT TO CREATE FAKE PICTURES OF SOMETHING THAT ALREADY EXISTS IN REAL
AND LEGIT FORM?", it seems that most CTers clam up and have no answer.
(Which isn't surprising actually, because there is no logical answer
to explain such silliness.)
Or, just maybe, the following scenario is one that could be purported
by CTers who still want to pretend that some of the backyard pictures
are frauds (even though they will readily admit that the one picture
that was linked to Oswald's camera via its negative IS, indeed, a
legit photograph):
1.) Marina Oswald took one "legitimate" picture of her husband, Lee,
in the Neely backyard on or around March 31, 1963.
2.) The evil conspirators, who were attempting to frame poor schnook
Lee Oswald in the months leading up to JFK's November visit to Texas,
then faked multiple pictures purportedly showing their patsy in the
Neely backyard -- but these conspirators did this WITHOUT EVEN BEING
AWARE THAT A REAL AND GENUINE PHOTO OF THEIR "PATSY" WAS TAKEN BY
MARINA!
3.) And it just so happens, by pure chance and coincidence, that the
FAKE pictures perfectly match the one REAL picture taken by Marina in
the very same backyard setting....right down to every detail, with LHO
holding a bolt-action rifle and wearing a pistol on his hip and
holding two Russian newspapers and wearing black clothing and the sun
shining brightly almost directly overhead, etc., etc.
Maybe that's the answer, huh? The plotters just got very lucky when
their fake pictures just happened to identically match the one real
photo snapped by Marina.
And then those same plotters, on 11/22/63, apparently (per many
conspiracists) got very lucky yet again when their insane plan of
attempting to frame a single patsy named Oswald by firing various guns
at JFK's car from several different directions yielded the following
autopsy results:
"The deceased died as a result of two perforating gunshot wounds
inflicted by high velocity projectiles. .... The projectiles were
fired from a point behind and somewhat above the level of the
deceased." -- FROM PAGE 6 OF JFK'S OFFICIAL AUTOPSY REPORT [WR; Pg.
543]
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0284a.htm
Conspiracists who favor any type of theory that has multiple gunmen
HITTING John F. Kennedy with rifle bullets from more than one gun must
certainly admit that those multiple gunmen sure as heck got mighty
lucky when JFK's three autopsy surgeons attached their signatures to
the document that contains the above paragraph.
After all, a MULTI-GUN, ONE-PATSY assassination plot like the one that
a vast majority of conspiracy theorists seem to think was pulled off
in Dealey Plaza in November '63 is the type of insane and needlessly
reckless plot that you don't see many people/plotters get away with
every day of the week.
And just think....per some CTers, James Files GOT AWAY WITH MURDERING
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, but then (many years later) he
decided he wanted to GET THE CREDIT for murdering the President,
instead of basking forever in the secure knowledge that he had
actually killed JFK and gotten away scot-free.
Go figure that mindset.