Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

9-11 Propagandists are squealing like stuck pigs about the upcoming KSM show trial ...(part 2:) Charles Krauthammer

2 views

Skip to first unread message

Lonegunner3

unread,

Nov 21, 2009, 8:40:00 AM11/21/09

I agree with the spooks that the upcoming 9-11 trial is bogus.

President Obama has already pronounced KSM guilty and has issued the
death penalty. Sen. Reed added, on the off-chance any patsy is found
not-guilty, the patsy is going back to jail anyway ... for ever.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/15/senators_mcconnell_reed_rudy_giuliani_on_fox_news_sunday.html

WALLACE: We've got about 30 seconds left. What if one of these guys
gets off?

REED: Well, if -- that is highly unlikely. The evidence is compelling.

WALLACE: But there are no guarantees in a trial.

REED: There are no guarantees, but under basic principles of
international law, as long as these individuals pose a threat, they
can be detained, and they will.

_____________________________________________

What can we learn from this unexpected show trial announcement and its
subsequent blowback?

Plenty! We now know Eric Holder is NOT a 9-11 Perp/Cover-up artist.
He's just a dumb-ass that doesn't know what's going on around here.

He actually believes Afghan cavemen with knives caused the greatest
engineering disaster in history. He believes patsy-guilt can be
proven in court; or, he believes a jury of peers will accept KSM's
forced confession, despite the waterboarding torture, and CIA
gang-rape of his small children.

Since the patsies are not getting out of jail no matter what, why
would the 9-11 facilitators be getting so bent-out-of-shape about the
upcoming trial? Because they want 9-11 to be: water-under-the-bridge.
It was such a great victory! It ushered in war and nullification of
the Bill of Rights. And now most people are starting to forget about
it. The only 9-11 memory left is: "Muslims attacked our freedom."

A 9-11 trial can not help the false flaggers in any way. A 9-11 trial
can only snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. People will start to
wonder (again) how and why the towers turned to dust. Why did the
spire turn to dust before it even fell? What flipped the cars? Why
did the bank get repaired and then demolished anyway? These are
questions - according to the 9-11 propagandists - that are best left
un-asked.

Bureaucrats, propagandists and functionaries that are squealing the
loudest about a 9-11 trial are the ones that have a room reserved at
the Pentagon's DEWdrop Inn. Consider them armed and dangerous.

Bureaucrats and functionaries that welcome Holder's trial are patriots
that don't know what's up. If the truth be known, a revolution could
break out. It could lead to the demise of the Pentagon and its
military aggression, domestic and foreign ... for ever.

Disgruntled Americans like myself welcome Holder's trial because we
get to see more pig squealing. We love to see the people we hate
express their distress. If New Yorkers can clean up the mess the
Pentagon made on 91101, they can manage to have a trial about it.

Most propaganda pigs squeal like an old sow being pushed through the
slaughterhouse gate, like Weeeeeee Weeeeeee Weeeeeeee.

Charles Krauthammer is squealing more like a pig that's just been
castrated and had its empty nut sack swabbed out with alcohol.

WHEEEEEEEEEE! WHEEEEEEEEEEEE! WHEEEEEEEEEE! WHEEEEEEEEEE!

*oink*oink*

Travesty in New York -- We are giving KSM a farcical show trial.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8205707050292695515#docid=1504642152540735485

By Charles Krauthammer

For late-19th-century anarchists, terrorism was the �propaganda of
the deed.� And the most successful propaganda-by-deed in history was
9/11 � not just the most destructive, but the most spectacular and
telegenic.

And now its self-proclaimed architect, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, has
been given by the Obama administration a civilian trial in New York.
Just as the memory fades, 9/11 has been granted a second life � and
KSM, a second act: 9/11, The Director�s Cut, narration by KSM.

Sept. 11, 2001 had to speak for itself. A decade later, the deed will
be given voice. KSM has gratuitously been presented with the greatest
propaganda platform imaginable � a civilian trial in the media capital
of the world � from which to proclaim the glory of jihad and the
criminality of infidel America.

So why is Attorney General Eric Holder doing this? Ostensibly, to
demonstrate to the world the superiority of our system, in which the
rule of law and the fair trial reign.

Really? What happens if KSM (and his co-defendants) �do not get
convicted,� asked Senate Judiciary Committee member Herb Kohl.
�Failure is not an option,� replied Holder. Not an option? Doesn�t the
presumption of innocence, er, presume that prosecutorial failure �
acquittal, hung jury � is an option? By undermining that presumption,
Holder is undermining the fairness of the trial, the demonstration of
which is the alleged rationale for putting on this show in the first
place.

Moreover, everyone knows that whatever the outcome of the trial, KSM
will never walk free. He will spend the rest of his natural life in
U.S. custody. Which makes the proceedings a farcical show trial from
the very beginning.

Apart from the fact that any such trial will be a security nightmare
and a terror threat to New York � what better propaganda-by-deed than
blowing up the entire courtroom, making KSM a martyr and making the
judge, jury, and spectators into fresh victims? � it will endanger
U.S. security. Civilian courts with broad rights of cross-examination
and discovery give terrorists access to crucial information about
intelligence sources and methods.

That�s precisely what happened during the civilian New York trial of
the 1993 World Trade Center bombers. The prosecution was forced to
turn over to the defense a list of 200 unindicted co-conspirators,
including the name Osama bin Laden. �Within ten days, a copy of that
list reached bin Laden in Khartoum,� wrote former Attorney General
Michael Mukasey, the presiding judge at that trial, �letting him know
that his connection to that case had been discovered.�

Finally, there�s the moral logic. It�s not as if Holder opposes
military commissions on principle. On the same day he sent KSM to a
civilian trial in New York, Holder announced he was sending Abd
al-Rahim al-Nashiri, mastermind of the attack on the U.S.S. Cole, to a
military tribunal.

By what logic? In his congressional testimony Wednesday, Holder was
utterly incoherent in trying to explain. In his November 13 news
conference, he seemed to be saying that if you attack a civilian
target, as in 9/11, you get a civilian trial; a military target like
the Cole, and you get a military tribunal.

What a perverse moral calculus. Which is the war crime � an attack on
defenseless civilians or an attack on a military target such as a
warship, an accepted act of war which the U.S. itself has engaged in
countless times?

By what possible moral reasoning, then, does KSM, who perpetrates the
obvious and egregious war crime, receive the special protections and
constitutional niceties of a civilian courtroom, while he who attacked
a warship is relegated to a military tribunal?

Moreover, the incentive offered any jihadi is as irresistible as it is
perverse: Kill as many civilians as possible on American soil and
Holder will give you Miranda rights, a lawyer, a propaganda platform �
everything but your own blog.

Alternatively, Holder tried to make the case that he chose a civilian
New York trial as a more likely venue for securing a conviction. An
absurdity: By the time Obama came to office, KSM was ready to go
before a military commission, plead guilty and be executed. It�s Obama
who blocked a process that would have yielded the swiftest and most
certain justice.

Indeed, the perfect justice. Whenever a jihadist volunteers for
martyrdom, we should grant his wish. Instead, this one, the most
murderous and unrepentant of all, gets to dance and declaim at the
scene of his crime.

Holder himself told the Washington Post that the coming New York trial
will be �the trial of the century.� The last such was the trial of O.
J. Simpson.

� Charles Krauthammer is a nationally syndicated columnist. � 2009,
The Washington Post Writers Group

...
Keep squealing! We love it when you pigs squeal like that.

Lonegunner3

unread,

Nov 22, 2009, 8:37:36 AM11/22/09

US Military Invasion and Occupation of the 9-11 Truth Movement
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60

Is it possible the �truth movement� has been run by the 9/11
perpetrators since day one?

Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the
�truth movement� away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these
plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?

Is it even possible that some of these plants are �in on it� while
others got suckered in? You be the judge.

***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the
Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many
commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the towers�
destruction.

Mineta steered the �truth movement� toward hijackings and plane
crashes by spreading the �Cheney stand down order� hoax.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871

***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at
Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm

Jones steered the �truth movement� toward thermite/conventional
explosives/molten metal theories. Jones� molten metal evidence has
been shown to be fabricated.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60

Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories with
statements such as �These two are noted for their
no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of
ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.�
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm

***Physicist Greg Jenkins� has connections to the NSA and DEW:

"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by
funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf

Jenkins� papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at
least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm

Jenkins steered the �truth movement� away from directed energy weapons
by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read of
the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html

***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van
Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html

Romero steered the �truth movement� toward standard controlled
demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount of
explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html

Romero is a controlled demolitions expert. Scroll down a little and
note the photo. Does Romero actually think this was caused by a
�relatively small amount of explosives�?

***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about
as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.

Bowman steered the �truth movement� toward hijackings, and NORAD
standing down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE

Although he is in Jim Fetzer�s Scholars group, I have not heard him
speaking about Dr Wood�s DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an
interview where Bowman states that he �doesn�t fall for conspiracy
theories� with regard to controlled demolition.

Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call this
a conspiracy theory?

Also of note is the following:

The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy
Professional Society for the NIST (NCSTAR 1) Report:

Boeing - Gold Level Current/Founding Sponsor
Applied Research Associates (ARA) - Silver Level Founding Sponsor
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) - Silver Level
Current Sponsor
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of
Directed Energy Weapons and have expertise in Psychological Operations
(PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

Dr Wood also discovered two images on ARA�s website that are similar
to the World Trade Center. She details this in her Appeal to NIST�s
denial of her Request for Correction.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

The New York Times is a mainstream media source. Do they tell the
truth of 9/11 or do they hide it? Why on earth would they help the
�truth movement� by publishing evidence of explosives?

The New York Times steered the �truth movement� towards explosives
demolitions by publishing the WTC Task Force Interviews.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html

However, they redacted evidence for Directed Energy Weapons.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html

Who's Popular On Corporate Media? Who's Not?

*William Rodriguez - publicly speaks up against DEW / TV-Fakery
http://www.911researchers.com/node/555#comment-4089

*David Ray Griffin - pro Global Government (aka New World Order)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg

*Steven Jones - pro explosives-demolition, pro thermite, pro molten
metal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYXNo0i_Cs

*Kevin Barrett - supports Steven Jones
http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html

*Robert Bowman - expert on NORAD�s jet-scrambling procedures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE

*Judy Wood - never invited to discuss the DEW evidence, despite her
filing of an actual court case
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

*Morgan Reynolds - never invited back after discussing TV-Fakery on
FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8

Reynolds also filed a court case
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...e1=federal_case

*Jerry Leaphart - mainstream attorney never invited to discuss his
clients� (Wood/Reynolds) 9/11 legal actions

In an interview with Kevin Barrett, trial attorney Jerry Leaphart has
said:

"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more
admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade
Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is
admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has
been promulgated."

MP3 Clip: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3
Full Show: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFCs.mp3

=======================================
9/11 T E R R O I S M T I M E L I N E
=======================================

The following is a timeline relating to promotion of the Alternate
Propaganda Conspiracy Theory by government plants and the media, and
suppression of the REAL version by government plants and media. Also
included is suppression of free energy research.

1978 (circa) - Steven Jones

Jones conducts post-doctoral research at Los Alamos.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm

Los Alamos is a center known for research on unconventional weaponry,
including directed energy weapons. Los Alamos is under the supervision
and is funded by the Department of Energy (DEO).
http://www.answers.com/los%20alamos%20lab

1989, March 23 - Stanley Pons / Martin Fleischmann / Steven Jones

Drs Pons and Fleischmann (P&F) hold a press conference revealing their
discovery of excess heat (free energy) from Cold Fusion experiments.
This press conference followed an announcement from Jones claiming his
intention to go public with his own Cold Fusion experimentation, which
discounted the excess heat.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4NtIqsqTE8
http://www.911researchers.com/node/125

Jones learnt of P&F from an informant at the DOE. P&F decided to go
public first to avoid being cheated, but were ridiculed by the media
due to their Cold Fusion process not yet being perfected. Jones
sabotaged research and development of free energy technologies, in
order to keep us addicted to oil.

1991, June - Eugene Mallove / Steven Jones

Dr Mallove�s book �Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the
Cold Fusion Furor� is published.
http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Ice-Searching-S...s/dp/0471531391

Republished 1999 (paperback). In print and available for purchase:
http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Ice-Searching-B...n/dp/1892925028

The book includes much detail of Jones� damage to Cold Fusion
research. Aside from P&F, Jones� name is mentioned more than any other
individual. Jones� Cold Fusion deceptions mirror his 9/11 deceptions
in many ways.

1993 - Eugene Mallove

Dr Mallove is interviewed on TV news program.

http://www.livevideo.com/video/landing/EE0...old-fusion.aspx

Mallove discusses his book, and says goodbye to the oil age.

1993 - Steven Jones

Jones has affiliations with Los Alamos at least through 1993.
http://profjones.com/index.php?p=about

Relevant quote: �Spokesman for LAMPF Experiment #727 and co-spokesman
for LAMPF Experiments #963 and #1151 (1982 - 1993).�

LAMPF = Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility

1999 - Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS)

DEPS is founded. From their website:

DEPS Mission: The Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS) was
founded in 1999 to foster research and development of Directed Energy
(DE) technology for national defense and civil applications through
professional communication and education. We intend to be recognized
as the premier organization for exchanging information about and
advocating research, development and application of Directed Energy.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEPSinfo.html

Silver Level Founding Sponsor: Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA)
Silver Level Current Sponsor: Science Applications International Corp.
(SAIC)
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

ARA and SAIC (as well as other DEPS sponsors) would later be
contracted by NIST to assist in the WTC investigation.

Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA/SAIC have expertise in the
manufacturer of Directed Energy Weapons as well as Psychological
Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

Things to consider: Why would NIST contract with them?

2000, August 18 - Van Romero

Romero is Vice President at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and
Technology, Research and Economic Development Department. He taught
courses and published papers on explosives and is considered an expert
in controlled demolitions.
http://infohost.nmt.edu/~red/van.html

Romero was a Roundtable Discussion moderator in DEPS event: �The
Future of Directed Energy Education: From Vocational Schools Through
Universities�
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html

Things to consider: Van Romero has directed energy weapon connections.

2000, Winter - DEPS� Newsletter �Wave Front�

The first article in Volume 1, Issue 1 of Wave Front starts with the
following quote:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf

Things to consider: DEPS is most definitely involved with the
development of directed energy weapons.

2001, September 11 - Norman Mineta

At 9:45AM, former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta orders all
civilian aircraft to land as soon as possible.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm

Also at 9:45AM, the Senior FAA Manager orders all aircraft to land.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context...a945slineyorder

Eighteen minutes later, at 10:03AM, the South Tower is destroyed.

At 10:28AM, the North Tower is destroyed.

Three minutes later, at 10:31AM, military flights resume.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context...standdownlifted

Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta

Lockheed Martin is a Gold Level Founding and Current Sponsor of the
Directed Energy Professional Society.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

Things to consider: Airplanes did not hit the towers. Why would Mineta
ground airplanes shortly before the South Tower was destroyed? Why
were military planes let back up three minutes after the North Tower
was destroyed? Did they want as few planes in the air as possible
during the timeframe of the towers� destruction for least interference
with a DEW?

2001, September 11 - Van Romero

The Albuquerque Journal publishes article �Explosives Planted In
Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says� where explosives expert Romero, says:

"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit
the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the
buildings that caused the towers to collapse"

"It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in
strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html

Things to consider: Remember that Romero has affiliations with DEPS
and is an explosives expert. Was he planted to steer the �truth
movement� towards controlled demolitions? Did he actually think the
WTC destruction was caused by a �relatively small amount of
explosives�?
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_...gy-Releases.jpg

2001, September 21 - Van Romero

Romero retracts his previous statement and sides with the official
account.

The Albuquerque Journal publishes article �Fire, Not Extra Explosives,
Doomed Buildings, Expert Says� which quotes Romero:

"Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail,"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html

Things to consider: He may have retracted it, but the �truth movement�
promote his original comments as �expert opinion�.

2001, October 16 - Van Romero

New Mexico Tech is named one of 16 �hot schools� for that Fall in the
Wall Street Journal
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2001/wsj.html

Things to consider: A reward for steering the �truth movement�?

2002, January 11 - Van Romero

Romero appointed National Chairman of the National Domestic
Preparedness Consortium (NDPC)
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/11jan05.html

Things to consider: Another reward?

2002, September 18 - Van Romero

New Mexico Tech receives $15 million grant for anti-terrorism program,
funded through U.S. Justice Department's (DOJ) Domestic Preparedness
Training and Technical Assistance Program.
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/25sept03.html

Things to consider: Yet, another reward?

2003, March 26 - Van Romero

Romero attends DEPS� �Directed Energy Modeling & Simulation Conference
2003� where he participates in the presentation �Platform Independent
Interface for using Supercomputers in the Modeling and Simulation of
Directed Energy Weapons�
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html

Things to consider: Romero presents material relating to directed
energy weapons!

2003, May 23 - Norman Mineta

Mineta tells the 9/11 Commission that he witnesses (what the �truth
movement� calls) a stand down order issued by Dick Cheney.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm

Things to consider: How could Mineta issue a stand down order if there
were no hijackings? Is it propaganda designed to mislead the �truth
movement�? Let�s remember Mineta�s connection to the Directed Energy
Professional Society.

2003, December 18 - Van Romero

Romero is one of �six lobbyists who made an impact in 2003� in an
article in Influence magazine.

BDK

unread,

Nov 22, 2009, 2:11:02 PM11/22/09

In article <0gfig5tjrfr46rrli...@4ax.com>,
antis...@battlefield.usa says...

>
>
> US Military Invasion and Occupation of the 9-11 Truth Movement
> http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60
>

> Is it possible the ?truth movement? has been run by the 9/11

> perpetrators since day one?
>
> Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the

> ?truth movement? away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these

> plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?
>

> Is it even possible that some of these plants are ?in on it? while

> others got suckered in? You be the judge.
>
>
>
> ***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the
> Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
>
> Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
> http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
>
> Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many

> commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the towers?
> destruction.
>
> Mineta steered the ?truth movement? toward hijackings and plane
> crashes by spreading the ?Cheney stand down order? hoax.

> http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
>
>
>
> ***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at
> Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
> http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm
>

> Jones steered the ?truth movement? toward thermite/conventional
> explosives/molten metal theories. Jones? molten metal evidence has

> been shown to be fabricated.
> http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60
>
> Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories with

> statements such as ?These two are noted for their

> no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of

> ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.?
> http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
>
>
>
> ***Physicist Greg Jenkins? has connections to the NSA and DEW:

>
> "This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by
> funding from the NSA."
> http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
>

> Jenkins? papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at

> least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
> http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
> http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm
>

> Jenkins steered the ?truth movement? away from directed energy weapons

> by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read of
> the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html
>
>
>
> ***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van
> Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
>
> Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
> http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
> http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html
>

> Romero steered the ?truth movement? toward standard controlled

> demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount of
> explosives placed in strategic points"
> http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
>
> Romero is a controlled demolitions expert. Scroll down a little and
> note the photo. Does Romero actually think this was caused by a

> ?relatively small amount of explosives??

>
>
>
> ***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about
> as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.
>

> Bowman steered the ?truth movement? toward hijackings, and NORAD
> standing down.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
>
> Although he is in Jim Fetzer?s Scholars group, I have not heard him
> speaking about Dr Wood?s DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an
> interview where Bowman states that he ?doesn?t fall for conspiracy
> theories? with regard to controlled demolition.

>
> Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call this
> a conspiracy theory?
>
>
>
>
> Also of note is the following:
>
> The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy
> Professional Society for the NIST (NCSTAR 1) Report:
>
> Boeing - Gold Level Current/Founding Sponsor
> Applied Research Associates (ARA) - Silver Level Founding Sponsor
> Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) - Silver Level
> Current Sponsor
> http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
>
> Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of
> Directed Energy Weapons and have expertise in Psychological Operations
> (PSYOPS).
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html
>

> Dr Wood also discovered two images on ARA?s website that are similar
> to the World Trade Center. She details this in her Appeal to NIST?s

> denial of her Request for Correction.
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
>
>
>
> The New York Times is a mainstream media source. Do they tell the
> truth of 9/11 or do they hide it? Why on earth would they help the

> ?truth movement? by publishing evidence of explosives?
>
> The New York Times steered the ?truth movement? towards explosives

> demolitions by publishing the WTC Task Force Interviews.
> http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html
>
> However, they redacted evidence for Directed Energy Weapons.
> http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html
>
>
>
> Who's Popular On Corporate Media? Who's Not?
>
> *William Rodriguez - publicly speaks up against DEW / TV-Fakery
> http://www.911researchers.com/node/555#comment-4089
>
> *David Ray Griffin - pro Global Government (aka New World Order)
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg
>
> *Steven Jones - pro explosives-demolition, pro thermite, pro molten
> metal
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYXNo0i_Cs
>
> *Kevin Barrett - supports Steven Jones
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html
>

> *Robert Bowman - expert on NORAD?s jet-scrambling procedures

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
>
>
> *Judy Wood - never invited to discuss the DEW evidence, despite her
> filing of an actual court case
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
>
> *Morgan Reynolds - never invited back after discussing TV-Fakery on
> FOX News
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
>
> Reynolds also filed a court case
> http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...e1=federal_case
>
> *Jerry Leaphart - mainstream attorney never invited to discuss his

> clients? (Wood/Reynolds) 9/11 legal actions

> Dr Mallove?s book ?Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the
> Cold Fusion Furor? is published.

> http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Ice-Searching-S...s/dp/0471531391
>
> Republished 1999 (paperback). In print and available for purchase:
> http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Ice-Searching-B...n/dp/1892925028
>

> The book includes much detail of Jones? damage to Cold Fusion
> research. Aside from P&F, Jones? name is mentioned more than any other
> individual. Jones? Cold Fusion deceptions mirror his 9/11 deceptions

> in many ways.
>
>
>
> 1993 - Eugene Mallove
>
> Dr Mallove is interviewed on TV news program.
>
> http://www.livevideo.com/video/landing/EE0...old-fusion.aspx
>
> Mallove discusses his book, and says goodbye to the oil age.
>
>
>
> 1993 - Steven Jones
>
> Jones has affiliations with Los Alamos at least through 1993.
> http://profjones.com/index.php?p=about
>

> Relevant quote: ?Spokesman for LAMPF Experiment #727 and co-spokesman
> for LAMPF Experiments #963 and #1151 (1982 - 1993).?

> Romero was a Roundtable Discussion moderator in DEPS event: ?The

> Future of Directed Energy Education: From Vocational Schools Through

> Universities?

> http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html
>
> Things to consider: Van Romero has directed energy weapon connections.
>
>
>

> 2000, Winter - DEPS? Newsletter ?Wave Front?

> during the timeframe of the towers? destruction for least interference

> with a DEW?
>
>
>
> 2001, September 11 - Van Romero
>

> The Albuquerque Journal publishes article ?Explosives Planted In

> Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says? where explosives expert Romero, says:
>
> "My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit
> the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the
> buildings that caused the towers to collapse"
>
> "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in
> strategic points"
> http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
>
> Things to consider: Remember that Romero has affiliations with DEPS

> and is an explosives expert. Was he planted to steer the ?truth
> movement? towards controlled demolitions? Did he actually think the
> WTC destruction was caused by a ?relatively small amount of
> explosives??

> http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_...gy-Releases.jpg
>
>
>
> 2001, September 21 - Van Romero
>
> Romero retracts his previous statement and sides with the official
> account.
>

> The Albuquerque Journal publishes article ?Fire, Not Extra Explosives,
> Doomed Buildings, Expert Says? which quotes Romero:

>
> "Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail,"
> http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
>

> Things to consider: He may have retracted it, but the ?truth movement?
> promote his original comments as ?expert opinion?.

>
>
>
> 2001, October 16 - Van Romero
>

> New Mexico Tech is named one of 16 ?hot schools? for that Fall in the

> Wall Street Journal
> http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2001/wsj.html
>

> Things to consider: A reward for steering the ?truth movement??

>
>
>
> 2002, January 11 - Van Romero
>
> Romero appointed National Chairman of the National Domestic
> Preparedness Consortium (NDPC)
> http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/11jan05.html
>
> Things to consider: Another reward?
>
>
>
> 2002, September 18 - Van Romero
>
> New Mexico Tech receives $15 million grant for anti-terrorism program,
> funded through U.S. Justice Department's (DOJ) Domestic Preparedness
> Training and Technical Assistance Program.
> http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/25sept03.html
>
> Things to consider: Yet, another reward?
>
>
>
> 2003, March 26 - Van Romero
>

> Romero attends DEPS? ?Directed Energy Modeling & Simulation Conference
> 2003? where he participates in the presentation ?Platform Independent

> Interface for using Supercomputers in the Modeling and Simulation of

> Directed Energy Weapons?

> http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
>
> Things to consider: Romero presents material relating to directed
> energy weapons!
>
>
>
> 2003, May 23 - Norman Mineta
>

> Mineta tells the 9/11 Commission that he witnesses (what the ?truth
> movement? calls) a stand down order issued by Dick Cheney.

> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
> http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
>
> Things to consider: How could Mineta issue a stand down order if there

> were no hijackings? Is it propaganda designed to mislead the ?truth
> movement?? Let?s remember Mineta?s connection to the Directed Energy

> Professional Society.
>
>
>
> 2003, December 18 - Van Romero
>

> Romero is one of ?six lobbyists who made an impact in 2003? in an

> article in Influence magazine.
>
> Other quotes from the article include:
>

> ?From his perch 2,000 miles outside of the Beltway, this physics Ph.D.
> understands exactly how Washington works.?
>
> ?A major chunk of his job involves lobbying for federal government

> funding, and if the 2003 fiscal year was any indication, Romero is a

> superstar.?

> http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2003/18dec01.html
>
> Things to consider: Again, more recognition
>
>
>
> 2004 (early) - Eugene Mallove
>
> Dr Mallove writes an open letter to the world asking for Cold Fusion
> and Zero Point Energy research funds.
> http://www.pureenergysystems.com/obituarie...0513/index.html
>
> Things to consider: Dr Mallove knows the importance of CF/ZPE research
> and development.
>
>
>
> 2004, February 3 - Eugene Mallove
>

> Dr Mallove is interviewed on ?Coast to Coast? radio program.

> http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio2/Dr%...2003%202004.mp3
>
> Things to consider: Dr Mallove wants to educate people of the
> importance of CF/ZPE research and development.
>
>
>
> 2004, May 24 - Eugene Mallove / Steven Jones
>
> Dr Mallove is murdered, allegedly by two people during a robbery.
> http://www.eugenemallove.org
>
> http://drjudywood.com/media/070703_Fetzer-RussGerst-CF.mp3
> http://drjudywood.com/media/070710_DDuo_StevenGreer.mp3
> http://drjudywood.com/media/070710_DDuo_ReynoldsGerst.mp3
>

> Things to consider: Eugene Mallove?s work interfered with Steven
> Jones? deceptions.

>
>
>
> 2004, November 11 - Kevin Ryan / David Ray Griffin / Steven Jones
>
> Former Underwriters Laboratories (UL) chemist, Kevin Ryan, emails NIST
> questioning their statements regarding the WTC steel. Ryan carbon
> copies the email to David Ray Griffin, and gets fired from UL.
> http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451
>

> The ?truth movement? would later learn that David Ray Griffin is

> pro-Global Government (aka New World Order)
>

> Things to consider: Ryan?s firing sends a signal to all professors and
> scientists within the ?truth movement? on the dangers of speaking up.

> Could this have been staged? Ryan is a strong supporter of Steven

> Jones and co-editor of Jones? journal.

>
>
>
> 2005, July - Judy Wood
>

> Dr Judy Wood anonymously publicizes first draft of her paper ?A
> Refutation of the Official Collapse Theory?, more commonly known as

> the Billiard Ball Example, or BBE.
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html
>
> Using basic Laws of Physics, this paper proves that freefall
> progressive collapse of the WTC is not possible unless the underlying
> floors start moving before upper floors.
>

> Things to consider: Although not understood within the ?truth
> movement?, Dr Wood?s paper is proof that the government?s account is

> false. However, it received no media coverage whatsoever.
>
>
>
> 2005, August 12 - Patricia Ondrovic
>

> The New York Times publishes EMT Patricia Ondrovic?s WTC Task Force

> Interview (along with about 500 others) on their website.
> http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html
>

> These testimonies are scoured by the ?truth movement? and evidence for

> explosives is discovered. However, a later interview with Ondrovic
> confirms that supporting testimony for directed energy weapons was
> redacted from her transcript.
> http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html
>
> Things to consider: Does the New York Times tell the truth about 9/11?
> Why on earth would they publish evidence for explosives? Is it

> designed to steer the ?truth movement? towards the controlled
> demolition theory? Ondrovic?s transcript contains over twenty

> blacked-out lines!
>
>
>
> 2005, August - Steven Jones / Judy Wood
>

> Jones publishes first version of ?Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings
> Collapse?? on Brigham Young University?s website.

> http://physics911.net/stevenjones
>
> Jones calls his paper a hypothesis, and promotes

> ?explosive-demolitions? and ?molten metal?. Molten metal was later

> proven a hoax.
> http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60
>

> Things to consider: Jones? hypothesis mysteriously comes out after
> Wood?s proof but somehow Jones? gets the attention.

>
>
>
> 2005, November 14 - Steven Jones / Judy Wood
>
> Jones goes on mainstream media (MSNBC).
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445
>

> Jones promotes ?explosives demolition? by calling it a ?hypothesis to
> be tested?, and promotes the ?molten metal? hoax.

>
> Things to consider: Dr Wood receives no media coverage for her proof,

> but Jones goes on corporate mainstream TV with his ?hypothesis to be
> tested? and ?molten metal?.

>
>
>
> 2006, February 10 - Patricia Ondrovic / Killtown
>
> Killtown interviews Patricia Ondrovic.
> http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html
>
> Ondrovic confirms she witnessed cars blowing up and that she had
> mentioned it in her WTC Task Force interview. However, it has been
> redacted from the New York Times transcript.
>

> Things to consider: Cars blowing up supports Dr Wood?s DEW theory.

>
>
>
> 2006, February 28 - Judy Wood / Michael Zebuhr / Steven Jones
>
> Dr Wood and Mr Zebuhr conduct demonstrations on molten aluminum that

> refute Steven Jones? claims.

> http://drjudywood.com/articles/aluminum/Aluminum_Glows.html
>
> Michael Zebuhr was a student of Dr Wood at Clemson University and a
> student member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
>
>
>
> 2006, March 18/19 - Michael Zebuhr / Steven Jones
>
> Michael Zebuhr is murdered, allegedly by two people during a robbery.
>
> On March 18 he was shot twice in the head and on March 19 he died.
> http://michaelzebuhr.blogspot.com/
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/aluminum/glowing.html
>

> Things to consider: Michael Zebuhr?s work interfered with Steven Jones

> deceptions.
>
>
>
> 2006, June 7 - Judy Wood
>
> Dr Wood attends 2006 Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual

> Conference and makes presentation entitled ?The World Trade Center

> Towers as Bio-inspired Structures: Characteristics of their Design and

> Demise?.
> http://scholarsfor911truth.org/PPT_Present...s.html#JudyWood
>
> Things to consider: Despite her presentation proving the government?s

> account of 9/11 false, no media outlet reports it.
>
>
>
> 2006, June 20 - Alex Jones / Steven Jones
>

> Alex Jones? Infowars publishes article entitled ?Scientific Analysis

> Proves Towers Brought Down By Incendiaries - Steven Jones' analysis on

> WTC steel about to be released?

> http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/sc...ncendiaries.htm
>
> Infowars receives more traffic than most, if not all, 9/11 sites. They
> are well known for promoting Steven Jones and opposing DEW and
> TV-Fakery.
>

> Things to consider: Where are when were Jones? findings released?
> Answer: they weren?t.

>
>
>
> 2006, June 25 - Steven Jones
>

> Jones attends the ?Americans Scholars Symposium? (ASS) and discusses

> evidence for thermite.
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5004704309041471296
>
> This was taped and later aired on C-SPAN, a mainstream source.
>
> Things to consider: Jones continues to be recognized for his

> ?hypothesis to be tested?.

>
>
>
> 2006, August 1 - Kevin Barrett / Steven Nass / Steven Jones
>

> The New York Times publishes article detailing Representative Nass?

> attempts to have Barrett fired from the University of
> Wisconsin-Madison due to his 9/11 related coursework in his class

> ?Islam: Religion and Culture?.

> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/education/01madison.html
>
> Things to consider: This sends a signal to all professors and
> scientists in the world on the dangers of speaking up. Could this have
> been staged? Barrett is a strong supporter of Steven Jones.
>
>
>
> 2006, August 23 - Morgan Reynolds / Judy Wood / Steven Jones
>

> Drs Reynolds and Wood publish their paper ?Why Indeed Did the WTC

> Buildings Disintegrate? A peer-review of Steven E. Jones' 9/11

> Research?

> http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html
>
>
>
> 2006, August 28 - David Ray Griffin
>
> An Associated Press article reveals Griffin to be pro-Global
> Government.
> http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:_vfWA...news/48456.html
>
> Global Government is also known as New World Order; something that
> George Bush Sr called for in a speech to a Joint Session of Congress
> on September 11, 1990.
> http://www.911researchers.com/node/439
>

> Griffin is known for pushing ?explosives demolition? and molten metal,

> and has been on corporate media numerous times.
>
> Things to consider: What is a pro-New World Order person doing in the

> ?truth movement?? Why would the corporate media promote Griffin?
>
>
>
> 2006 (late) - 911Blogger.com
>
> 911Blogger requires all blogs to be ?approved? before showing up.

> [NEED SOURCE]
>
> The moderators systematically censor directed energy weapons and WTC
> no-plane theories.
>
> Things to consider: 911Blogger is one of the highest traffic 9/11
> sites on the internet.
>
>
>
> 2006, September 10 - Morgan Reynolds
>
> Dr Reynolds appears on mainstream media (FOX News)
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
>
> Reynolds pushes TV-Fakery and encourages people to look at the
> evidence for themselves. Reynolds has never appeared on corporate
> media since.
>

> Things to consider: If TV-Fakery was really ?crazy disinfo?, why
> didn?t FOX discredit the ?truth movement? by inviting him back?

>
>
>
> 2006, October - Eric Salter / Steven Jones
>

> Jones? ?Journal of 9/11 Studies? site posts Salter?s anti-TV-Fakery

> paper
> http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200610/Salter.pdf
>
> This strawman paper does not refute the TV-Fakery smoking gun proof:
> It is physically impossible for an aluminum airplane with a plastic
> nosecone to glide into a steel and concrete building.
>

> Things to consider: 911Blogger ?regulars? were overwhelmed with glee

> by the release of this paper.
>
>
>
> 2006, October 17 - Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
>

> Drs Wood and Reynolds publicize first version of ?The Star Wars Beam
> Weapons? paper.

> http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam1.html
>
> Wood and Reynolds reveal this paper at an early stage for self
> preservation.
>
> Things to consider: This paper was attacked from the get-go.
>
>
>
> 2006, November 20 - Steven Jones / James Fetzer / Judy Wood / Morgan
> Reynolds
>
> Jones includes the following in an email to Dr Fetzer. (Emphasis
> added.)
>
> "I will also observe that there is a group of 9/11 researchers,
> including Reynolds, Wood, Haupt and Holmgren, who take the approach of
> personalized attacks on any other researcher who dares to suggest that
> real planes hit the Towers. Really - they support the
> "no-planes-hit-Towers" notion so strongly that they resort to personal
> attacks on anyone who challenges their pet theory. As I have done."
>

> ?The current "pet theory" that I have challenged is one now supported

> by you and (not surprisingly) Wood and Reynolds - the idea that "space
> beams" or "energy beams" were directed at the Towers to bring them

> down.?

>
> http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/JonesResponse.html
>
>
> Jones ridicules the DEW / TV-Fakery theories in an attempt to

> discourage people from taking it seriously. Jones uses the term ?space
> beam? even though Wood and Reynolds have never said the weapon must be

> in space.
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam7.html#DEW
>
> Things to consider: Jones worked at Los Alamos where directed energy
> weapons are researched.
>
>
>
> 2006, November 25 - James Fetzer / Steven Jones / Judy Wood
>
> Dr Fetzer includes the following in an open letter on the Scholars
> website. (Emphasis added.)
>

> ?Although [Judy Wood] did not commit herself to that specific

> hypothesis, she also suggested that directed energy could have come
> from above, such as from a space-based satellite using a mirror to
> direct energy. That has led to a veritable propaganda blitz attacking

> us both for considering "space beam" weaponry!?
>
> ?I had become aware of [Jones] strenuous objections to having "star
> wars beam weapons" hypotheses mentioned on our home page. (Judy?s use

> of "star wars" was a subtle intimation of its probable origins, but

> Steve has used "space beams" in order to denigrate it!)?

>
> http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/ScholarsAnniversary.html
>
> Things to consider: Fetzer is on to what Jones is doing.
>
>
>
> 2006, December 6 - Steven Jones / James Fetzer / Judy Wood / Morgan
> Reynolds
>
> Jones includes the following in an email announcing his resignation
> from Scholars for 9/11 Truth (Emphasis added):
>

> ?Of late, [Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy

> Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their
> no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of
> ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.
> I join Kevin Ryan and many others in withdrawing from the group so
> that my name will not be attached to the personalized attacks and

> ray-beams-from-space stuff on www.st911.org.?
>
> ?We won?t spend much time on ray-beams from space knocking down the
> Towers!?
>
> ?I support this statement made recently by Dr. Frank Legge, Kevin

> Ryan, Victoria Ashley, and other (previous) members of the Scholars
> for 9/11 Truth: "...As of this date the web site continues to promote
> assertions which [are] unsupported by the evidence (ray-beams from
> space caused the demolitions, mini-nukes were used in the WTC towers,

> real commercial jets did not hit the WTC towers, etc.)...."?

>
> http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
>
> Things to consider: Jones continues ridiculing.
>
>
>
> 2006, December 14 - Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds / Steven Jones
>

> Drs Wood and Reynolds publish their paper ?The Scientific Method
> Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis?.

> Jenkins? papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at

> least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
> http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
> http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm
>
> Things to consider: Why did Jenkins promote this video? Was he trying

> to make the ?truth movement? look good? What is someone with NSA
> affiliations doing in the ?truth movement?? When one reads the

> transcript of the interview, its obvious Dr Wood wins the debate hands
> down.
>
>
>
> 2007, February - Greg Jenkins / Steven Jones
>

> Jones? ?Journal of 9/11 Studies? site posts Jenkins anti-DEW paper
> http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/...ory-Jenkins.pdf
>
> Things to consider: By the size of this paper, it?s obvious that

> Jenkins spent a lot of time on it. Why would he do this? Why is
> someone with NSA/DEW connections trying to discredit the DEW theory?
>
>
>
> 2007, March 8 - Morgan Reynolds / Jerry Leaphart
>
> Dr Reynolds files a Request for Correction (RFC) with the government
> regarding the 9/11 NIST Report (NCSTAR1).
> http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070308_MR_RFC.pdf
>

> Reynolds? RFC reveals evidence of fake airplane crash videos at the

> WTC, and requests the NIST Report be corrected due to false and
> misleading statements.
>

> This RFC utilizes the Data Quality Act, a law uncovered by Reynolds?

> attorney, Jerry Leaphart.
>
> Things to consider: An official legal document prepared by a former
> high level government insider and a mainstream attorney and no media
> outlet reports it! Why?
>
>
>
> 2007, March 16 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart
>
> Dr Wood files a Request for Correction (RFC) with the government
> regarding the 9/11 NIST Report (NCSTAR1).
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html
>
> The NIST website (at present) has a visually distorted version of the
> RFC.
> http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004678
>
> Dr Wood reveals evidence of Directed Energy Weapons at the WTC and
> shows NCSTAR 1 to be false, deceptive and misleading.
>

> Wood explains that since NIST did not analyze the Towers? destruction,

> they cannot claim (scientifically, legally, or otherwise) that they

> ?collapsed?.
>
> The RFC utilizes the Data Quality Act, a law uncovered by Wood?s

> attorney, Jerry Leaphart.
>
> Things to consider: An official legal document prepared by a former
> university mechanical engineering professor and a mainstream attorney
> no media outlet reports it! Why?
>
>
>
> 2007, March 27 - Steven Jones
>

> Jones? team files a press release titled ?Independent Investigators
> Release Suppressed Blueprints of Destroyed World Trade Center Tower?.
> http://stj911.org/press_releases/blueprints.html
>
> They push ?explosives demolition?, ?collapse?, and ?molten metal?.
>
> Comments: Isn?t it strange how this appeared just eleven days after Dr
> Wood?s official and legal filing of Request for Correction with NIST?

>
>
>
> 2007, March 29 - Judy Wood
>
> Dr Wood files Supplement #1 to her Request for Correction to NIST.
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_W...supplement.html
>
>
>
> 2007, April 14 - Steven Jones
>

> Jones and his team file press release titled ?Scholars and Family
> Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report?.
> http://stj911.org/press_releases/NIST.html
>
> The press release and RFC promote ?explosives demolition?, but make no

> mention of thermite or molten metal.
>
> Things to consider: Strange how Jones hides evidence of thermite and

> molten metal that he claims to have. Why didn?t Jones send his RFC
> ?return receipt requested? like Wood and Reynolds have? Jones? RFC
> isn?t even dated! Real legal, huh???

>
>
>
> 2007, April 16 - Judy Wood
>

> Several of Dr Wood?s instructors were killed at Virginia Polytechnic

> Institute.
>
> NBC News & Chicago Sun-Times ran reports on the REAL BALLISTICS Monday
> night before the official story cemented into place Tuesday morning.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHw3Z7itSbM
>

> Things to consider: Why didn?t the police close off the area after the

> massacre? Perhaps they already knew who the perpetrators were? Dr

> Wood?s instructors were killed exactly one month after her RFC was

> filed.
>
>
>
> 2007, April 20 - Judy Wood
>
> Dr Wood files Supplement #2 to her Request for Correction to NIST.
> http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004118
>
>
>
> 2007, April 25 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart
>
> Dr Wood, with Mr Leaphart, file Qui Tam case under seal.
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/unseal...orig_filing.jpg
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
>
> Dr Wood sues the private contractors hired by NIST alleging they
> conspired to hide evidence of directed energy weapons at the WTC.
> Included in the suit are ARA, SAIC, and Boeing, sponsors of the
> Directed Energy Professional Society.
>
> This case is filed under seal and therefore not known to the public.
>
>
>
> 2007, May 1 - Morgan Reynolds
>
> Dr Reynolds files Supplement to Request for Correction with NIST
> http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070501_MORsup1_to_RFC.pdf
>
>
>
> 2007, May 16 - Judy Wood / Greg Jenkins
>

> Dr Wood posts first version of her paper, ?Molecular Dissociation:
> from Dust to Dirt?:

> http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt1.html
>
> Dr Wood got the idea for this paper from the information that Jenkins
> tried to avoid in the January 2007 ambush interview.
>
> Things to consider: We all thank Jenkins for the information!
>
>
>
> 2007, May 28 - Steven Jones / ae911truth.org
>

> Jones? crew files press release titled ?"Architects and Engineers for
> 9/11 Truth" Announces Website Launch?

> http://stj911.org/press_releases/AE911Trut...essRelease.html
>
> ae911truth is a strong promoter of explosives demolitions of the
> Towers and WTC 7. They also promote the molten metal hoax, and support
> Jones. They make no mention of the damage to WTC 3, WTC 4, WTC 5, and
> WTC 6, all of which exhibit signs of damage from directed energy
> weapons.
>
> ae911truth is covered in the mainstream media.
> [NEED SOURCE, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE???]
>

> Things to consider: It?s strange how this organization came out of
> nowhere after Wood and Reynolds filed their RFCs, and after Wood?s new

> Dust to Dirt paper. Just as puzzling is the fact that ae911truth was

> in the mainstream media while Wood/Reynolds? legal filings were not.

>
>
>
> 2007, June 14, 2007 - John Del Giorno / Jeff Hill
>
> Del Giorno was the camera operator on the WABC 7 chopper on 9/11, and

> caught one of the two live ?second plane impacts?.

>
> 9/11 researcher Jeff Hill calls Del Giorno for some information. Del

> Giorno says he?ll call back, but never does.
> http://www.shure.proboards19.com/index.cgi...read=1192128055
>
> Things to consider: Why didn?t he call back?

>
>
>
> 2007 - June 29 - Morgan Reynolds
>

> NIST asks for ?more time? to respond to Reynolds? RFC.

> http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_003259
>
> NISTs typical response time is 60 days.
>
>
>
> 2007, June 29 - Judy Wood
>

> NIST asks for ?more time? to respond to Wood?s RFC.

> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_letter.html
>
> NISTs typical response time is 60 days.
>
>
>
> 2007, July 26 - Judy Wood / Andrew Johnson / Ambrose Lane
>

> Dr Wood and Mr Johnson are scheduled to be interviewed on Mr Lane?s XM
> Radio show ?The Power?.

> http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...task=view&id=43
>
> Before interview time, XM cancelled the show and fired Lane.
>
>
>
> 2007, July 27 - Judy Wood
>

> NIST denies Dr Wood?s RFC. However, they confirm the statement from
> the NIST Report that they didn?t analyze the ?collapses?.

>
> "As stated in NCSTAR 1, NIST only investigated the factors leading to
> the initiation of the collapses of the WTC towers, not the collapses
> themselves."
> http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070727_PROD01_003222.pdf
>
> Dr Wood is the ONLY 9/11 Research Scientist to get NIST to confirm the

> statement in their own report on not analyzing the ?collapses?.

>
> Things to consider: An official government document prepared by NIST

> declining Dr Wood?s Request for Correction, and no media outlet
> reports it! If the DEW theory had no merit, why didn?t the government
> and media discredit the ?truth movement? by publicizing this?

>
>
>
> 2007, August 22 - Judy Wood
>
> Dr Wood files Appeal with NIST regarding their RFC response.
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
>
> NIST posts a low quality black and white version.
> http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004121
> http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004122
>

> Things to consider: Why did NIST convert Dr Wood?s original document

> to a low quality version before posting to their website?
>
>
>
> 2007, September 12 - Judy Wood
>

> The US District Court in Southern New York unseals Dr Wood?s Qui Tam

> case.
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/unseal...orderunseal.jpg
> http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
>
>
>
> 2007, September 28 - Morgan Reynolds
>

> NIST declines Dr Reynolds? RFC.

> http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...t_denies_prelim
>
> Things to consider: An official government document prepared by NIST

> declining Dr Reynolds? Request for Correction, and no media outlet
> reports it! If the TV-Fakery/No-Plane theory had no merit, why didn?t
> the government and media discredit the ?truth movement? by publicizing

> this? NISTs typical response time is 60 days. Why did NIST need 6 and
> a half months?
>
>
>
> 2007, September 25 - David Ray Griffin
>
> Griffin makes presentation in Ohio.
> http://www.columbus911truth.org/2007/09/27...a-huge-success/
>

> He states his belief in ?Global Government? (aka New World Order).

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg
>
>
>
> 2007, September 29 - James Fetzer / Judy Wood
>

> Dr Fetzer files press release detailing Dr Wood?s RFC Appeal.

> http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ji..._wtc_report.htm
>
>
>
> 2007, October 4 - Kevin Ryan / Steven Jones / Greg Jenkins
>

> 911Blogger posts Ryan?s blog which promotes Jenkins? new anti-DEW
> theory paper on Jones ?Journal of 9/11 Studies? site:

> http://www.911blogger.com/node/11830
>
> Things to consider: Is it coincidence than this anti-DEW paper came

> out just five days after Dr Fetzer?s pro-DEW theory press release?

>
> 2007, October 8 - Paul Smith / Jeff Hill / John Del Giorno
>
> Paul Smith was the WABC Chopper 7 pilot. The camera operator, John Del
> Giorno, was called by Jeff Hill four months earlier.
>
> Smith is run over and killed by a taxi, which swerved after being

> cutoff by a ?black car?.
> http://www.shure.proboards19.com/index.cgi...ge=1#1192129204
>
> Things to consider: Is Smith?s death a random event? Or is there more

> to it?
> user posted image
>
>
>
> 2007, October 9 - ae911truth
>
> Ae911truth is mentioned in Raw Story, a top left-wing alternate news
> site.
> http://rawstory.com/news/2007/911_Truthers...slams_1009.html
>
> Things to consider: The media continues to push the molten metal hoax.
>
>
>
> 2007, October 11 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart / James Fetzer
>
> Dr Wood publicizes the September 12, 2007 unsealing of her court case
> against the private contractors hired by NIST. She and Mr Leaphart

> appear on Dr Fetzer?s Dynamic Duo radio show, and Fetzer publishes a

> press release.
> http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ji...r_files__22.htm
> http://tinyurl.com/3dmpqo (MP3 of show)
>
>
>
> 2007, October 26 - Morgan Reynolds
>
> Dr Reynolds files Appeal with NIST regarding their RFC response.
> http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...ge1=nist_appeal
>
> 2008, January 14 2008 - Dr Judy Wood
>
> Appears on Ambrose Lane show with Andrew Johnson to discuss her latest
> research: Hutchison Effect and 9/11. On 18th Jan, John Hutchison also
> joins the program:
>
> http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
>
> 2008, May 19 - Dr Judy Wood
>
> Dr Wood posts new research linking Hurricane Erin into the events on
> 9/11. The study references "field effects" in relation to Erin and the
> Hutchison Effect:
>
> http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/
>
> http://www.prlog.org/10073301-new-study-by-former-professor-examines-hurricane-erin-on-9-11-01.html
>
> 2008, May 29 - Dr Judy Wood and John Hutchison
>
> They give presentations in Portland, OR regarding 9/11, The Hutchison
> Effect and Field Effects.
>
> http://www.drjudywood.com/videos/videojj2008.html
>
>
>

All that nonsense, when planes, impact, fuel, fires, and of course,
gravity, explains everything.

Such is the, uh, er, thinking of the kooktardic.
--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.

0 new messages