"On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person who wrote a substantial part of it.
"This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John McAdams} the following statement for posting:
<quote on>
July 2, 2007
I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's book "Reclaiming History."
For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand reports of what it says.
I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full extent of my involvement in his book.
I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
David Lifton owes me an apology.
David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
Patricia Lambert
<quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
======================
Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
> "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> <quote on>
> July 2, 2007
> I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > book "Reclaiming History."
> For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > reports of what it says.
> I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > extent of my involvement in his book.
> I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> David Lifton owes me an apology.
> David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> Patricia Lambert
> <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> ======================
> Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
He had better watch out, he is liable to lose all that credibility he has built up over the years. And luckily there is a forum like Black Op Radio, so that idiots can listen to liars tell lies.
Very good work by .John McAdams and David Von Pein at getting the truth out (not that it will stop kooks from jabbering that VB`s didn`t write RH).
lazuli...@webtv.net wrote: > Okay, so it wasn't ghostwritten, but what about spookwritten?
Of course *they* are behind the writting of Bugliosi`s book. "They" are behind everything. And *they* will come and get you, unless you stop writting stupid things in newsgroups.
If I was Bugliosi-I'd sure claim it was ghostwritten!-you'd have to be a scumbag and a half to take credit for this monstrosity. You might as well have written it Bud..it's that bad...
> The best part of Rosemary's response is her Bug's quote where even OUR > LITTLE RICLAND, Ric Landers, is threatened with potential legal action > if he doesn't shut the F up!
> Ric Landers came to this group just a few months ago, and it's obvious > that he didn't know much about the case-which is no big deal-but it's > just funny that within a week of posting really lame-ass beginner > questions here he had the whole damn thing figured out.
> And within a few short months he's managed to piss off highly > accomplished Vincent Bugliosi to the point where he lumps ricland in > with David Lifton and threatens legal action!
> HaHaHaHaHa!!!!!!
> Where is ricland?????
Why do you think he went on "vacation"? Maybe he got an e-mail also...
lazuli...@webtv.net wrote: > If I was Bugliosi-I'd sure claim it was ghostwritten!-you'd have to be a > scumbag and a half to take credit for this monstrosity.
Yah, it`s pretty boring, no gunmen down sewers, no projectile firing umbrellas, no conspiracy elves flittering hither and yon planting evidence. If you need that to hold your interest, stick to Cartoon Network, reality just isn`t always that interesting.
> You might as > well have written it Bud..it's that bad...
I think Bugs stole some of my material, he calls you guys "kooks" a lot.
>> The best part of Rosemary's response is her Bug's quote where even OUR >> LITTLE RICLAND, Ric Landers, is threatened with potential legal action >> if he doesn't shut the F up!
>> Ric Landers came to this group just a few months ago, and it's obvious >> that he didn't know much about the case-which is no big deal-but it's >> just funny that within a week of posting really lame-ass beginner >> questions here he had the whole damn thing figured out.
>> And within a few short months he's managed to piss off highly >> accomplished Vincent Bugliosi to the point where he lumps ricland in >> with David Lifton and threatens legal action!
>> HaHaHaHaHa!!!!!!
>> Where is ricland?????
> Why do you think he went on "vacation"? Maybe he got an e-mail > also...
Or maybe he is taking a long vacation inside a cement block.
> "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> <quote on>
> July 2, 2007
> I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > book "Reclaiming History."
> For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > reports of what it says.
> I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > extent of my involvement in his book.
> I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> David Lifton owes me an apology.
> David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> Patricia Lambert
> <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> ======================
> Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
> "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> <quote on>
> July 2, 2007
> I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > book "Reclaiming History."
> For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > reports of what it says.
> I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > extent of my involvement in his book.
> I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> David Lifton owes me an apology.
> David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> Patricia Lambert
> <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> ======================
> Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
Bugliosi owes us ALL an apology, a 1620 page rewrite of othe original Warren Commission Report is a complete waste of time (except of course for those rabid, foaming at the mouth, Lone Nutter's)
A month for Lambert's denial, eh? Then dumping it on .john.... (VonPein shame on you, LMAO!)? Perhaps the wuss should get in touch with Black Op Radio and request a interview.... then Bugliosi and Lambert appear again on Black Op Radio, this time with Lifton?
Sheeeeeet Von Pein, with that line up I suspect you'd sell a few of those boat anchor books you got wasting away in a warehouse someplace...
On Jul 2, 10:05 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> <quote on>
> July 2, 2007
> I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > book "Reclaiming History."
> For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > reports of what it says.
> I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > extent of my involvement in his book.
> I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> David Lifton owes me an apology.
> David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> Patricia Lambert
> <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> ======================
> Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
> He had better watch out, he is liable to lose all that credibility > he has built up over the years. And luckily there is a forum like > Black Op Radio, so that idiots can listen to liars tell lies.
If I wonna read the bullshit of a bunch of liars, well I got it here: the LN Imbezile crowd.
> > "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> > "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> > <quote on>
> > July 2, 2007
> > I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > > book "Reclaiming History."
> > For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > > reports of what it says.
> > I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > > extent of my involvement in his book.
> > I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> > Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> > David Lifton owes me an apology.
> > David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> > Patricia Lambert
> > <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> > ======================
> > Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> > I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> > Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
aeffects wrote: > Bugliosi owes us ALL an apology, a 1620 page rewrite of othe original > Warren Commission Report is a complete waste of time (except of course > for those rabid, foaming at the mouth, Lone Nutter's)
It seems to have the kook all in a tizzy. They see the handwritting on the wall, the assassination has been made assessable to the average person, they won`t have to rely on being hand-fed kook factoids anymore.
> A month for Lambert's denial, eh?
Wouldn`t you still be a suspicious idiot had it arrived sooner?
> Then dumping it on .john.... > (VonPein shame on you, LMAO!)? Perhaps the wuss should get in touch > with Black Op Radio and request a interview.... then Bugliosi and > Lambert appear again on Black Op Radio, this time with Lifton?
Couldn`t you read Lambert`s response to Lifton? Heres a novel idea, why doesn`t Lifton just support his allegations? "something doesn`t look right" carries great weight with kooks, it doesn`t fly with rational people.
> > "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> > "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> > <quote on>
> > July 2, 2007
> > I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > > book "Reclaiming History."
> > For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > > reports of what it says.
> > I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > > extent of my involvement in his book.
> > I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> > Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> > David Lifton owes me an apology.
> > David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> > Patricia Lambert
> > <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> > ======================
> > Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> > I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> > Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
> aeffects wrote: > > Bugliosi owes us ALL an apology, a 1620 page rewrite of othe original > > Warren Commission Report is a complete waste of time (except of course > > for those rabid, foaming at the mouth, Lone Nutter's)
> It seems to have the kook all in a tizzy. They see the handwritting > on the wall, the assassination has been made assessable to the average > person, they won`t have to rely on being hand-fed kook factoids > anymore.
> > A month for Lambert's denial, eh?
> Wouldn`t you still be a suspicious idiot had it arrived sooner?
> > Then dumping it on .john.... > > (VonPein shame on you, LMAO!)? Perhaps the wuss should get in touch > > with Black Op Radio and request a interview.... then Bugliosi and > > Lambert appear again on Black Op Radio, this time with Lifton?
> Couldn`t you read Lambert`s response to Lifton? Heres a novel idea, > why doesn`t Lifton just support his allegations? "something doesn`t > look right" carries great weight with kooks, it doesn`t fly with > rational people.
> > Sheeeeeet Von Pein, with that line up I suspect you'd sell a few of > > those boat anchor books you got wasting away in a warehouse > > someplace...
> > On Jul 2, 10:05 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote: > > > >From a post at alt.assassination.jfk.......
> > > "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > > > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > > > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> > > "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > > > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> > > <quote on>
> > > July 2, 2007
> > > I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > > > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > > > book "Reclaiming History."
> > > For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > > > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > > > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > > > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > > > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > > > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > > > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > > > reports of what it says.
> > > I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > > > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > > > extent of my involvement in his book.
> > > I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > > > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > > > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> > > Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > > > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > > > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > > > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> > > David Lifton owes me an apology.
> > > David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> > > Patricia Lambert
> > > <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> > > ======================
> > > Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > > > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > > > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> > > I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > > > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > > > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > > > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> > > Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > > > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > > > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > > > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > > > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
Did Lone and Healy both graduate 3rd grade from the Academy of Mislead Morons? I realize completing the 3rd grade was a major accomplishment for them both...it's apparent they never progressed any further then 3rd grade academics. I now know why they refuse to read RH. Any word over 5 letters long that isn't a cuss word and they would be totally lost. As for Ricland, he's posting his open letter to Tom Hanks around the internet and taking a beating from anyone who reads it. Maybe he plans on running as head Bwana in the Bahamas. He might be able to get some of those illiterate natives to believe his BS. Chico should join him! Justme
>>> "The best part of Rosemary's response is her Bug's quote where even OUR LITTLE RICLAND, Ric Landers, is threatened with potential legal action if he doesn't shut the F up!" <<<
Oh yeah! You're right!
~slaps forehead!~
That is "Ricland". I didn't associate that name with our very own Ric- Kook.
Excellent. I hadn't realized that, or I certainly would have mentioned it in my previous post re. Rosemary's excellent retort to Lifton's nonsense.
I've posted the John McAdams/Rosemary Newton information at Amazon's "RH" Forum too (just for good measure; and because the Ric-Kook has repeated most of his Bugliosi-bashfest there as well).....
> On Jul 4, 1:13 pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
> > aeffects wrote: > > > Bugliosi owes us ALL an apology, a 1620 page rewrite of othe original > > > Warren Commission Report is a complete waste of time (except of course > > > for those rabid, foaming at the mouth, Lone Nutter's)
> > It seems to have the kook all in a tizzy. They see the handwritting > > on the wall, the assassination has been made assessable to the average > > person, they won`t have to rely on being hand-fed kook factoids > > anymore.
> > > A month for Lambert's denial, eh?
> > Wouldn`t you still be a suspicious idiot had it arrived sooner?
> > > Then dumping it on .john.... > > > (VonPein shame on you, LMAO!)? Perhaps the wuss should get in touch > > > with Black Op Radio and request a interview.... then Bugliosi and > > > Lambert appear again on Black Op Radio, this time with Lifton?
> > Couldn`t you read Lambert`s response to Lifton? Heres a novel idea, > > why doesn`t Lifton just support his allegations? "something doesn`t > > look right" carries great weight with kooks, it doesn`t fly with > > rational people.
> > > Sheeeeeet Von Pein, with that line up I suspect you'd sell a few of > > > those boat anchor books you got wasting away in a warehouse > > > someplace...
> > > On Jul 2, 10:05 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote: > > > > >From a post at alt.assassination.jfk.......
> > > > "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > > > > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > > > > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> > > > "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > > > > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> > > > <quote on>
> > > > July 2, 2007
> > > > I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > > > > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > > > > book "Reclaiming History."
> > > > For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > > > > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > > > > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > > > > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > > > > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > > > > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > > > > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > > > > reports of what it says.
> > > > I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > > > > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > > > > extent of my involvement in his book.
> > > > I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > > > > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > > > > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> > > > Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > > > > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > > > > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > > > > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> > > > David Lifton owes me an apology.
> > > > David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> > > > Patricia Lambert
> > > > <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> > > > ======================
> > > > Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > > > > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > > > > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> > > > I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > > > > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > > > > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > > > > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> > > > Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > > > > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > > > > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > > > > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > > > > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
> Did Lone and Healy both graduate 3rd grade from the Academy of > Mislead Morons?
sitdown you in-choate asshole (those over 5 letters?) When you post anything related to the JFK assassination maybe we'll give you a twirl.... right on the end of your stained keyboard...
> On Jul 4, 12:48 pm, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > On Jul 4, 1:13 pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
> > > aeffects wrote: > > > > Bugliosi owes us ALL an apology, a 1620 page rewrite of othe original > > > > Warren Commission Report is a complete waste of time (except of course > > > > for those rabid, foaming at the mouth, Lone Nutter's)
> > > It seems to have the kook all in a tizzy. They see the handwritting > > > on the wall, the assassination has been made assessable to the average > > > person, they won`t have to rely on being hand-fed kook factoids > > > anymore.
> > > > A month for Lambert's denial, eh?
> > > Wouldn`t you still be a suspicious idiot had it arrived sooner?
> > > > Then dumping it on .john.... > > > > (VonPein shame on you, LMAO!)? Perhaps the wuss should get in touch > > > > with Black Op Radio and request a interview.... then Bugliosi and > > > > Lambert appear again on Black Op Radio, this time with Lifton?
> > > Couldn`t you read Lambert`s response to Lifton? Heres a novel idea, > > > why doesn`t Lifton just support his allegations? "something doesn`t > > > look right" carries great weight with kooks, it doesn`t fly with > > > rational people.
> > > > Sheeeeeet Von Pein, with that line up I suspect you'd sell a few of > > > > those boat anchor books you got wasting away in a warehouse > > > > someplace...
> > > > On Jul 2, 10:05 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote: > > > > > >From a post at alt.assassination.jfk.......
> > > > > "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > > > > > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > > > > > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> > > > > "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > > > > > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> > > > > <quote on>
> > > > > July 2, 2007
> > > > > I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > > > > > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > > > > > book "Reclaiming History."
> > > > > For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > > > > > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > > > > > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > > > > > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > > > > > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > > > > > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > > > > > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > > > > > reports of what it says.
> > > > > I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > > > > > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > > > > > extent of my involvement in his book.
> > > > > I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > > > > > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > > > > > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> > > > > Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > > > > > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > > > > > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > > > > > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> > > > > David Lifton owes me an apology.
> > > > > David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> > > > > Patricia Lambert
> > > > > <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> > > > > ======================
> > > > > Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > > > > > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > > > > > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> > > > > I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > > > > > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > > > > > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > > > > > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> > > > > Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > > > > > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > > > > > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > > > > > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > > > > > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
> > Did Lone and Healy both graduate 3rd grade from the Academy of > > Mislead Morons?
> sitdown you in-choate asshole (those over 5 letters?) When you post > anything related to the JFK assassination maybe we'll give you a > twirl.... right on the end of your stained keyboard...
> <snip the Nutter gutter tripe, as always>- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Awwwwwwwww Healy I just love getting under you skin. Now go rub Bennies feet, that's alot of weight he has to carry around, his bunyons are sore!!!! You do know what a bunyon is don't you pickle brain???
> >>> "The best part of Rosemary's response is her Bug's quote where even OUR LITTLE RICLAND, Ric Landers, is threatened with potential legal action if he doesn't shut the F up!" <<<
> Oh yeah! You're right!
> ~slaps forehead!~
> That is "Ricland". I didn't associate that name with our very own Ric- > Kook.
> Excellent. I hadn't realized that, or I certainly would have mentioned > it in my previous post re. Rosemary's excellent retort to Lifton's > nonsense.
> Thanks.
> And I hope a lawsuit IS forthcoming. I'd love it.
yeah, uh-huh..... LMFAO! Nutter weaklings always insist someone else sue the CT, when the rubber meets the road, you bail!
I suspect there are more than a few CT theorists/authors that would WELCOME a lawsuit, especially with Bugliosi's latest issue out there (well, in the tank-but out there none-the-less)...
How is that Bugliosi mini-series/docu coming along David Von Pein? I've heard rumors its DOA, that correct?
> > > > aeffects wrote: > > > > > Bugliosi owes us ALL an apology, a 1620 page rewrite of othe original > > > > > Warren Commission Report is a complete waste of time (except of course > > > > > for those rabid, foaming at the mouth, Lone Nutter's)
> > > > It seems to have the kook all in a tizzy. They see the handwritting > > > > on the wall, the assassination has been made assessable to the average > > > > person, they won`t have to rely on being hand-fed kook factoids > > > > anymore.
> > > > > A month for Lambert's denial, eh?
> > > > Wouldn`t you still be a suspicious idiot had it arrived sooner?
> > > > > Then dumping it on .john.... > > > > > (VonPein shame on you, LMAO!)? Perhaps the wuss should get in touch > > > > > with Black Op Radio and request a interview.... then Bugliosi and > > > > > Lambert appear again on Black Op Radio, this time with Lifton?
> > > > Couldn`t you read Lambert`s response to Lifton? Heres a novel idea, > > > > why doesn`t Lifton just support his allegations? "something doesn`t > > > > look right" carries great weight with kooks, it doesn`t fly with > > > > rational people.
> > > > > Sheeeeeet Von Pein, with that line up I suspect you'd sell a few of > > > > > those boat anchor books you got wasting away in a warehouse > > > > > someplace...
> > > > > On Jul 2, 10:05 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > >From a post at alt.assassination.jfk.......
> > > > > > "On Black Op Radio, David Lifton claimed that much of Vince Bugliosi's > > > > > > book was ghost written, and even named Patricia Lambert as one person > > > > > > who wrote a substantial part of it.
> > > > > > "This was brought to the attention of Lambert, who sent me {John > > > > > > McAdams} the following statement for posting:
> > > > > > <quote on>
> > > > > > July 2, 2007
> > > > > > I have received several accounts of remarks David Lifton made about me > > > > > > on the Black Op Radio program of May 24th concerning Vince Bugliosi's > > > > > > book "Reclaiming History."
> > > > > > For the record: I did not write one single word of Vince Bugliosi's > > > > > > book, not even a footnote. I never saw Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I > > > > > > never saw any portion of Vince Bugliosi's manuscript. I didn't even > > > > > > get a peek at the galleys. No comma, colon, semi-colon, parenthesis, > > > > > > hyphen, apostrophe or period is my doing, to say nothing of sentences, > > > > > > paragraphs and a whole chapter. Because I have been traveling, I have > > > > > > not even seen the published book and have only sketchy, second hand > > > > > > reports of what it says.
> > > > > > I have indeed been in touch with Bugliosi; we have talked on the > > > > > > telephone and I provided him with some documents. That is the full > > > > > > extent of my involvement in his book.
> > > > > > I cannot imagine what prompted Lifton to make such a stunningly false > > > > > > allegation about me. But false it is. I am not a ghostwriter. I have > > > > > > never been a ghostwriter. I have no intention of being a ghostwriter.
> > > > > > Since I know unequivocally that Lifton is wrong about the role he > > > > > > assigned to me, I see no reason to believe he is correct about the > > > > > > other unidentified writers on whom he has bestowed the credit for > > > > > > having written Vince Bugliosi's book.
> > > > > > David Lifton owes me an apology.
> > > > > > David Lifton owes Vince Bugliosi an apology.
> > > > > > Patricia Lambert
> > > > > > <quote off>" -- John McAdams; July 2, 2007
> > > > > > ======================
> > > > > > Lifton, from sheer nothingness, decided to smear both Mr. Bugliosi's > > > > > > good name and work ethic and also Patricia Lambert, who wrote a very > > > > > > good book on Jim Garrison several years ago, "False Witness". .....
> > > > > > I agree with Patricia -- Lifton owes everybody involved a formal > > > > > > apology. His accusation was merely a CTer with a burr up his butt > > > > > > after having his silly conspiracy theory handily destroyed in print by > > > > > > Vince Bugliosi in "Reclaiming History" (and rightly so too).
> > > > > > Even prior to seeing Ms. Lambert's response, I knew that Lifton's > > > > > > charge was a false one, by merely reading through Vincent's book. > > > > > > There is no "style" difference from chapter to chapter, as alleged by > > > > > > Lifton in late May 2007. That's nonsense. But nonsense never stopped a > > > > > > rabid CTer....just ask David S. Lifton. He's as rabid as they come.
> > > Did Lone and Healy both graduate 3rd grade from the Academy of > > > Mislead Morons?
> > sitdown you in-choate asshole (those over 5 letters?) When you post > > anything related to the JFK assassination maybe we'll give you a > > twirl.... right on the end of your stained keyboard...
> > <snip the Nutter gutter tripe, as always>- Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
> Awwwwwwwww Healy I just love getting under you skin. Now go rub > Bennies feet, that's alot of weight he has to carry around, his > bunyons are sore!!!! You do know what a bunyon is don't you pickle > brain???
LMFAO! you? 1st you need to demonstrate minimum knowledge concerning material this board covers. You haven't! Which makes you a fucking troll Justme1952, the like of which this board has put up with for 15 years now.... Have a nice 4th, don't get to close to the flame or the fireworks....
Kook Alert! Healy's on board ship! Sound the K-Alarm!
>>> "Nutter weaklings always insist someone else sue the CT, when the rubber meets the road, you bail!" <<<
Care to comment on the obvious-fraudulent tripe that Lifton and Ricland have engaged in? Or would you rather still believe the charges are true, despite Rosemary's fabulous letter which skewers Lifton to the wall?
>>> "I suspect there are more than a few CT theorists/authors that would WELCOME a lawsuit, especially with Bugliosi's latest issue out there (well, in the tank...)." <<<
It's far from being "in the tank", Mr. Kook. As of this date, it hasn't dropped out of the Top 1000 on Amazon at any time since its May 15, 2007, release date. And just yesterday it was as high as #450 or so in the rankings. Not bad at all for a book of that length, price, and pro-LN subject matter.
But keep thinking it has tanked if you want. You believe in a lot of screwy things that aren't true. Why should RH be any different?
>>> "How is that Bugliosi mini-series/docu coming along David Von Pein? I've heard rumors its DOA, that correct?" <<<
And you heard rumors from Lifton that VB's book was written by other people too...right? So what?
But the answer is: The HBO project (as of this writing) has certainly not been cancelled. And that verification comes straight from Vince Bugliosi's mouth as of a Seattle radio interview he did late night July 1st, 2007, just three days ago, which was four days AFTER Debra Conway decided to post on her Lancer (Kook) website on June 27th that "inside sources" told her that the HBO miniseries was "dead", and (per Conway) "wasn't really ever alive", despite a goodly amount of pre- production publicity to the contrary. .....
> On Jul 4, 12:52 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote: >> >>> "The best part of Rosemary's response is her Bug's quote where even >> >>> OUR LITTLE RICLAND, Ric Landers, is threatened with potential legal >> >>> action if he doesn't shut the F up!" <<<
>> Oh yeah! You're right!
>> ~slaps forehead!~
>> That is "Ricland". I didn't associate that name with our very own Ric- >> Kook.
>> Excellent. I hadn't realized that, or I certainly would have mentioned >> it in my previous post re. Rosemary's excellent retort to Lifton's >> nonsense.
>> Thanks.
>> And I hope a lawsuit IS forthcoming. I'd love it.
> yeah, uh-huh..... LMFAO! Nutter weaklings always insist someone else > sue the CT, when the rubber meets the road, you bail!
> I suspect there are more than a few CT theorists/authors that would > WELCOME a lawsuit, especially with Bugliosi's latest issue out there > (well, in the tank-but out there none-the-less)...
> How is that Bugliosi mini-series/docu coming along David Von Pein? > I've heard rumors its DOA, that correct?
