Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Mark Lane #186
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Ben Holmes
Jan 31, 2013, 9:37:06 AM1/31/13
to
In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane began listing the real facts surrounding
the
bus driver, McWatters.
"When that part of the case against Oswald collapsed, newspapers which had
previously told of a grinning assassin neglected to publish McWatters'
correction.
More to the point, however, is that while seeking to identify Milton Jones, who
was 16 years of age, McWatters picked out a man of 24 and thereby raised doubts
as
to his powers of observation.
McWatters said that he did not tell the Dallas police that the number two man in
the lineup was the same man who got on his bus. Thinking of young Jones,
McWatters
said that the number two man resembled one of his passengers.
'... I told them [the Dallas police] that there was one man in the lineup was
about the size and the height and complexion of a man that got on my bus, but as
far as positively identifying the man I could not do it.'
The Dallas police prepared a list of the results of the lineups in which Oswald
appeared. Published as part of Commission Exhibit 2003, it notes, 'Cecil J.
McWatters, positive identification'. Yet McWatters told the Commission he made
no
positive identification. Nevertheless, in the words of the Report, 'The
Commission
is satisfied that the lineups were conducted fairly.'"
Mark Lane is pointing out the facts regarding the bus driver, McWatters; and how
the Warren Commission lied about his testimony.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
the
bus driver, McWatters.
"When that part of the case against Oswald collapsed, newspapers which had
previously told of a grinning assassin neglected to publish McWatters'
correction.
More to the point, however, is that while seeking to identify Milton Jones, who
was 16 years of age, McWatters picked out a man of 24 and thereby raised doubts
as
to his powers of observation.
McWatters said that he did not tell the Dallas police that the number two man in
the lineup was the same man who got on his bus. Thinking of young Jones,
McWatters
said that the number two man resembled one of his passengers.
'... I told them [the Dallas police] that there was one man in the lineup was
about the size and the height and complexion of a man that got on my bus, but as
far as positively identifying the man I could not do it.'
The Dallas police prepared a list of the results of the lineups in which Oswald
appeared. Published as part of Commission Exhibit 2003, it notes, 'Cecil J.
McWatters, positive identification'. Yet McWatters told the Commission he made
no
positive identification. Nevertheless, in the words of the Report, 'The
Commission
is satisfied that the lineups were conducted fairly.'"
Mark Lane is pointing out the facts regarding the bus driver, McWatters; and how
the Warren Commission lied about his testimony.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
aeffects
Jan 31, 2013, 1:44:35 PM1/31/13
to
damn low, isn't it?
timstter
Jan 31, 2013, 3:52:22 PM1/31/13
to
I guess to you and Lane it means he was never on the bus?
Case CLOSED on Lane's KGB funded idiocy in this matter.
TB
Ben Holmes
Jan 31, 2013, 9:21:07 PM1/31/13
to
In article <b65583a4-1d46-47a0...@v7g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
>
>On Jan 31, 6:37=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane began listing the real facts surrou=
>s, who
>> was 16 years of age, McWatters picked out a man of 24 and thereby raised =
> was
>> about the size and the height and complexion of a man that got on my bus,=
>Oswald
>> appeared. Published as part of Commission Exhibit 2003, it notes, 'Cecil =
>J.
>> McWatters, positive identification'. Yet McWatters told the Commission he=
preconceived theory.
And stayed away from anything that didn't...
>> Mark Lane is pointing out the facts regarding the bus driver, McWatters; =
aeffects says...
>
>On Jan 31, 6:37=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane began listing the real facts surrou=
>nding
>> the
>> bus driver, McWatters.
>>
>> "When that part of the case against Oswald collapsed, newspapers which ha=
>> the
>> bus driver, McWatters.
>>
>d
>> previously told of a grinning assassin neglected to publish McWatters'
>> correction.
>> More to the point, however, is that while seeking to identify Milton Jone=
>> previously told of a grinning assassin neglected to publish McWatters'
>> correction.
>s, who
>> was 16 years of age, McWatters picked out a man of 24 and thereby raised =
>doubts
>> as
>> to his powers of observation.
>>
>> McWatters said that he did not tell the Dallas police that the number two=
>> as
>> to his powers of observation.
>>
> man in
>> the lineup was the same man who got on his bus. Thinking of young Jones,
>> McWatters
>> said that the number two man resembled one of his passengers.
>>
>> '... I told them [the Dallas police] that there was one man in the lineup=
>> the lineup was the same man who got on his bus. Thinking of young Jones,
>> McWatters
>> said that the number two man resembled one of his passengers.
>>
> was
>> about the size and the height and complexion of a man that got on my bus,=
> but as
>> far as positively identifying the man I could not do it.'
>>
>> The Dallas police prepared a list of the results of the lineups in which =
>> far as positively identifying the man I could not do it.'
>>
>Oswald
>> appeared. Published as part of Commission Exhibit 2003, it notes, 'Cecil =
>J.
>> McWatters, positive identification'. Yet McWatters told the Commission he=
> made
>> no
>> positive identification. Nevertheless, in the words of the Report, 'The
>> Commission
>> is satisfied that the lineups were conducted fairly.'"
>
>the Commission is "satisfied"? My-oh-my, that's setting the bar pretty
>damn low, isn't it?
They apparently were "satisfied" with anything that helped them support their
>> no
>> positive identification. Nevertheless, in the words of the Report, 'The
>> Commission
>> is satisfied that the lineups were conducted fairly.'"
>
>the Commission is "satisfied"? My-oh-my, that's setting the bar pretty
>damn low, isn't it?
preconceived theory.
And stayed away from anything that didn't...
>> Mark Lane is pointing out the facts regarding the bus driver, McWatters; =
Walt
Jan 31, 2013, 9:57:45 PM1/31/13
to
of the shirt he was wearing when he was arrested.
Recall that Mrs Robert's saw "Lee" who was one of her tenants go into
his room at 1:00pm. He was only in his room a couple of minutes and
changed his clothes.
When Lee was arrested in the theater the police damned near tore the
shirt off his back, Photos of him after his arrst show the shirt
hanging limply from one shoulder.
Look at photos of the bus transfer.....It's pristine. Transfers were
made from newsprint ( newspaper paper) If that transfer had been in
Oswald's shirt pocket when he was arrested it would not have remained
uncrumpled or creased.
He might have forgotten to remove the bus transfer from the shirt he
removed in his room, and therefore it was not sujected to the rough
handling it would have received if it had been in his arrest shirt.
timstter
Feb 1, 2013, 4:32:52 PM2/1/13
to
> Recall that Mrs Robert's saw "Lee" who was one of her tenants go into
> his room at 1:00pm. He was only in his room a couple of minutes and
> changed his clothes.
>
> When Lee was arrested in the theater the police damned near tore the
> shirt off his back, Photos of him after his arrst show the shirt
> hanging limply from one shoulder.
>
try to shoot them.
> Look at photos of the bus transfer.....It's pristine. Transfers were
> made from newsprint ( newspaper paper) If that transfer had been in
> Oswald's shirt pocket when he was arrested it would not have remained
> uncrumpled or creased.
>
> He might have forgotten to remove the bus transfer from the shirt he
> removed in his room, and therefore it was not sujected to the rough
> handling it would have received if it had been in his arrest shirt.
>
*reasoning* on display.
Informative Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
0 new messages