Rosstards Ripped Another Aho At AAJ .... !
cdddraftsman
On Nov 6, 6:45 pm, john.mcad...@marquette.edu (John McAdams) wrote:
> Rossley certainly did. He seems to think that I promised to post a
> link to the debate on my website. But what I said was that I would
> "post" it, and I meant I would post it here.
> --
> The Kennedy Assassination Home Pagehttp://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm- Hide quoted text -
Have some compassion .John , if you link your #1 site to # 764,853
www.whokilledjfk.net , tomnln might get a few visiitors .
Knock some of those cobbwebs off his entry portal and think of all
the
positive results that a person can achieve by studying there ?
A person who doesn't know any better might think that tomnln is a
expert
on the assassination by studying his technique , AAMOF I've found
that :
a) By telling only half the assassination story , it's more
'interesting'
that way .
b) Tomnln appears to be bang on here also ..... 'Gargling' from 'The
Fountain of Knowledge' is definately more fun . 'Drinking' ? Avoid
it ,
you might hurt yourself .
c) Here's one that you pointed out was a JFK Do-Gooder dream come
true :
tomnln has everyone blaming everyone else . He's got "(R) blaming
(D) ,
he's got (D) blaming the right wing CIA and FBI . The North blaming
the
South's Big Texas Oil Barons . If blaming a lone nut commy isn't
sufficiently satisfying everyone can blame the Mafia" . This is not on
the
face of it necessarily important in understanding 'Who killed JFK' .
However it is of essential importance if you want to , by the process
of
elimination , identify 'Who didn't kill JFK' :
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc291/cdddraftsman/BigAnnouncement...
This may hold , in the end , a better way of resolving LN v CT gaffes
and
gapes , you never can tell where important idea's may come from .
d) A good example of idea's posted as important , clearing up any
notion
that CTer's do not have a unified theory after 46 years , can be found
at
his video prognosticators "price-less" pad and hangout You- Tube .
Where
Gil Jesus has LBJ killing JFK in the 60's because of his un-popular
Vietnam War and right next to this GHWB is accused because of his
sons
equally un-popular Iraq War . Confused ? This is suggestive , and I
don't
want to make a hasty judgment call before all the facts are in but ,
tomnln supports any attempts to bridge 'The Generation Gap' that are
"priced-less" ie. inexpensive : I'm starting to avoid words that hurt
like
'cheap shot video's' , remembering Hoffa's sage advice "that a
perceived
slight" is much worse than a outright flame .
e) If you're anti-conspiracy tomnln doesn't hide the fact by disguise
that
he's in disagreement , surprising yet refreshing candor from a beyond
the
pale , dye in the wool CTer .... literally ! :
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc291/cdddraftsman/HealyTheHi-Jack...
f) Regardless of your persuasion there's plenty to do-good , musings
endlessly to dead ends , and lots of evidence of non-conspiracy , his
website is full of it , again so to speak :
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc291/cdddraftsman/rar.gif
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc291/cdddraftsman/tom_lo21.jpg
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc291/cdddraftsman/tom_lo7.jpg
Clear , concise , cogent and as clean as a whistle :
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc291/cdddraftsman/JFKsLIMODEFINAT...
end ....
tl ...
..
.