Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Who is "king" of the "1 author" threads, Von Pein or cdddraftsman ?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Gil Jesus

unread,
Apr 19, 2008, 7:07:15 AM4/19/08
to
In light of last month's latest re-posting of Von Pein's "THE
ASSASSINATION OF JFK --A LONE GUNMAN PERSPECTIVE in which 27 of 29
posts were made by Von Pein

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/302161facdf2875a/7259f3de018f4310?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=14+posts#

I was just wondering.....who is being ignored more, Von Pein or
LOWry ?


http://www.youtube.com/GJJdude

YoHarvey

unread,
Apr 19, 2008, 9:05:04 AM4/19/08
to
On Apr 19, 7:07 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> In light of last month's latest re-posting of Von Pein's "THE
> ASSASSINATION OF JFK --A LONE GUNMAN PERSPECTIVE in which 27 of 29
> posts were made by Von Pein
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/threa...

>
> I was just wondering.....who is being ignored more, Von Pein or
> LOWry ?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/GJJdude


Of course you were wondering. It's what ignorant uneducated
unemployed people do. They scour the internet, watch TV and wonder
what a bloody mess their lives are. Fits you to a tee huh Chico?

YoHarvey

unread,
Apr 19, 2008, 11:10:50 AM4/19/08
to


Jesus? I've got an idea. Since viewership is your main goal, truth
be damned. Why not put a video of you blowing Rossley onto Utube?
You'd get all the viewers you crave. Same viewers you get right now
lol.

tomnln

unread,
Apr 20, 2008, 12:34:35 AM4/20/08
to

"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ce87e39-c177-47c8...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...


Rossley gets all his blow jobs from your wife/daughter ! ! ! !

PLUS all the scotch I can use from her $0.35 Tricks.

Wanna address these?>>>

http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm

http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.ht

robcap...@netscape.com

unread,
Apr 20, 2008, 1:09:46 PM4/20/08
to
On Apr 19, 7:07 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> In light of last month's latest re-posting of Von Pein's "THE
> ASSASSINATION OF JFK --A LONE GUNMAN PERSPECTIVE in which 27 of 29
> posts were made by Von Pein
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/threa...
>

"I was just wondering.....who is being ignored more, Von Pein or
LOWry ?

http://www.youtube.com/GJJdude"

Great question Gil! CD whatever's are pure drivel so they are easily
ignored, but Von Pein puts so much thought and energy into his, yet
they are really no better than CD whoever's. When you do respond to
Dave's (when you have a few hours free and the fortitude to answer a
never-ending post) he then just ignores the answers since he can't
refute them. Therefore, he is really left with debating with himself
under the guise of debating with "CTers" from some other board.


aeffects

unread,
Apr 20, 2008, 1:21:23 PM4/20/08
to
On Apr 19, 4:07 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> In light of last month's latest re-posting of Von Pein's "THE
> ASSASSINATION OF JFK --A LONE GUNMAN PERSPECTIVE in which 27 of 29
> posts were made by Von Pein
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/threa...

>
> I was just wondering.....who is being ignored more, Von Pein or
> LOWry ?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/GJJdude

Lowry is burnt out, Mel Ayton has called him home.... Von Pein (who
needs a job) is simply trying to impress VB and DMyers .... both post
for pure digital tonnage. I know of no one that reads their nonsense
and pap.....

aeffects

unread,
Apr 20, 2008, 1:25:29 PM4/20/08
to

and then there's this dolt -- direct from the Office of Naval
Intelligence..... LMFAO! Sources say he's Joey's (aka Justme1952)
dad.....

Walt

unread,
Apr 20, 2008, 2:04:19 PM4/20/08
to
On 19 Apr, 06:07, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> In light of last month's latest re-posting of Von Pein's "THE
> ASSASSINATION OF JFK --A LONE GUNMAN PERSPECTIVE in which 27 of 29
> posts were made by Von Pein
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/threa...

>
> I was just wondering.....who is being ignored more, Von Pein or
> LOWry ?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/GJJdude

It's a dead heat....... Both Von Pea Brain and Daffy are prolific
posters of nonsense, but neither of them post anything of substance.
They appear to be just babbling idiots who talk to themselves most of
the time.

David Von Pein

unread,
Apr 21, 2008, 1:11:56 AM4/21/08
to

>>> "Von Pein puts so much thought and energy into his [posts]...when you do respond to Dave's...he then just ignores the answers since he can't refute them." <<<


<chuckle>

Rob The Kook actually thinks his ABO junk HASN'T yet been "refuted".
Ya gotta love the denial of it!

<more chuckles ensuing>

INSTANT REPLAY:

>>> "...When you do respond to Dave's [posts]...he then just ignores the answers since he can't refute them." <<<


It's easy to ignore an empty vessel. And if anybody's vessel is
emptier than Robert Caprio's, I've yet to see it.


>>> "Therefore, he is really left with debating with himself under the guise of debating with "CTers" from some other board." <<<

Look! Another piece of incorrect info coming from an uninformed CT-
Kook! What a surprise.

In reality, of course, whenever you see "CTer" attached to a quote in
a DVP post, that (usually-absurd) quotation was, indeed, spoken at
some point in time by a conspiracy promoter.

Incredible, I know...but some CTer actually said those things to which
I responded.

Martin Shackelford

unread,
Apr 21, 2008, 2:08:12 AM4/21/08
to
A one-author thread is mainly an effort to propagandize through headings.

Martin

"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ce87e39-c177-47c8...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

aeffects

unread,
Apr 21, 2008, 2:09:28 AM4/21/08
to

David your credibility is out the window.... go to Amazon and post
there..... plenty of Lone znut wankers holding your jockstrap
there.... you're finished son.....

robcap...@netscape.com

unread,
Apr 22, 2008, 2:47:20 PM4/22/08
to
On Apr 21, 1:11 am, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>> "Von Pein puts so much thought and energy into his [posts]...when you do respond to Dave's...he then just ignores the answers since he can't refute them."

"<chuckle>"

I should charge for all the laughs I give Dave.

"Rob The Kook actually thinks his ABO junk HASN'T yet been "refuted".
Ya gotta love the denial of it!"

Show me where and when it has been refuted.

"<more chuckles ensuing>"

Another opportunity to earn money lost.

"INSTANT REPLAY:"

Cool, this is like ESPN.


> >>> "...When you do respond to Dave's [posts]...he then just ignores the answers since he can't refute them." <<<

"It's easy to ignore an empty vessel. And if anybody's vessel is
emptier than Robert Caprio's, I've yet to see it."

You wish, you don't stand a chance of refuting the real evidence so
you ignore them. We all know that IF you thought you could belittle
what I said you would be all over it, the fact you ignore it speaks
volumes. You can't contend with the truth.


> >>> "Therefore, he is really left with debating with himself under the guise of debating with "CTers" from some other board." <<<

"Look! Another piece of incorrect info coming from an uninformed CT-
Kook! What a surprise."

Touchy, touchy.

"In reality, of course, whenever you see "CTer" attached to a quote in
a DVP post, that (usually-absurd) quotation was, indeed, spoken at
some point in time by a conspiracy promoter."

But they do NOT have the chance to defend themselves since it was
posted awhile ago or somewhere else.

"Incredible, I know...but some CTer actually said those things to
which I responded."

Nothing they say is crazier than the WC's assertions.

0 new messages