YOHARVEY: "DEBATE ME"
Gil Jesus
Oswald rifle had no scope when found. Baileynme-spiffy-YoHarvey wrote:
"The scope was NOT on the MC when it was found. It was laying
alongside the weapon."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/e3aedb4b219289ad
But a photo of Lt. Day in the TSBD picking the rifle up by the strap
SHOWS a scope ATTACHED:
http://pictures.aol.com/galleries/gjjmail/41602cXrkH0*ic1Lb0imwIK1Lw8sYt--F*VUv4xQp5Fd3Ig=/large/
DEBATING SOMEONE THIS IGNORANT WOULD BE LIKE BEATING A POOR DUMB
ANIMAL.
YoHarvey
> It was YoHarvey, under the screenname baileynme who claimed that the
> Oswald rifle had no scope when found. Baileynme-spiffy-YoHarvey wrote:
> "The scope was NOT on the MC when it was found. It was laying
> alongside the weapon."
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/e3aedb4b219289ad
>
> But a photo of Lt. Day in the TSBD picking the rifle up by the strap
> SHOWS a scope ATTACHED:
>
>
> DEBATING SOMEONE THIS IGNORANT WOULD BE LIKE BEATING A POOR DUMB
> ANIMAL.
He falls for it every single time. I say jump, Jesus says "how high".
He's so afraid to debate the subject, he will say and do ANYTHING to
avoid it.
Chico? How did Connally shoot JFK?
Such a simple question. Got an answer?
Debate me LIVE and I'll explain the scope......deal?
robcap...@netscape.com
Debate me live, what is this guy's/girl's/it's problem? You run from
debate everyday on this forum why would a LIVE debate be any
different? Why live? You can debate here to your heart's content,
but you never do, why? Because you don't have a clue about the JFK
assassination is why, or you choose to spread deliberate lies.
justm...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Stop whining like a child crapper. Theres a big difference debating
live and hiding behind a computer copying and pasting half assed
articles and trying to state their facts. You, Chico, Holmes, Walt
couldn't survive in a live debate. You don't have time to go look
things up...read your pitiful articles and books that you come back
here and spew at everyone as facts. You're all a bunch of chickens. Yo
has debated a few people live...real researchers, not morons like you
and your little group of stooges. You'd rather hide behind your
computer and type your fingers to the bone or copy and paste bullshit.
You're famous for that.
Notice I didn't include Healy in your group....we can't understand his
typing I doubt we'd be able to understand his man of the wanna be hood
street talk. Now go put your jammies on child and have mommy tuck you
in bed. When you grow up you can play with the adults.
tomnln
"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:d284cb02-2544-4941...@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Child Molester Yo(Momma)Harvey also said JFK.s Dallas speech was gonna make
a Total comittment to VietNam.
HERE is that undelivered speech from the JFK Presidential Museum>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/dallas_speech.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
aeffects
> On Apr 15, 7:44 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > It was YoHarvey, under the screenname baileynme who claimed that the
> > Oswald rifle had no scope when found. Baileynme-spiffy-YoHarvey wrote:
> > "The scope was NOT on the MC when it was found. It was laying
> > alongside the weapon."
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/e3aedb4b219289ad
>
> > But a photo of Lt. Day in the TSBD picking the rifle up by the strap
> > SHOWS a scope ATTACHED:
>
> >http://pictures.aol.com/galleries/gjjmail/41602cXrkH0*ic1Lb0imwIK1Lw8...
>
> > DEBATING SOMEONE THIS IGNORANT WOULD BE LIKE BEATING A POOR DUMB
> > ANIMAL.
>
> He falls for it every single time. I say jump, Jesus says "how high".
you're stealing my line you insufferable dweeb, save your energy for
the 45 questions and the 16 smoking guns...
presently you're 0 for 2, not a good sign
Gil Jesus
>
> Debate me live, what is this guy's/girl's/it's problem? �You run from
> debate everyday on this forum why would a LIVE debate be any
> different? �Why live? �You can debate here to your heart's content,
> but you never do, why? �Because you don't have a clue about the JFK
> assassination is why, or you choose to spread deliberate lies.-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent point Rob. The "debate me live" BS is just that----BS. These
people show NO INTEREST in debating the "facts" as they call them in
THIS forum and until they do, there is no need to take it to any other
level.
They can't debate the facts. They don't even own the WC volumes.
That's why they never refer to them unless it includes a McAdams link.
Accepting a challenge from losers like those is a waste of time.
In a "live" debate, you'll be debating McAdams and Rahn. Not them.
tomnln
justm...@gmail.com
> "Gil Jesus" <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:72c78c29-9429-4025...@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Apr 15, 9:48�pm, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Debate me live, what is this guy's/girl's/it's problem? �You run from
> > debate everyday on this forum why would a LIVE debate be any
> > different? �Why live? �You can debate here to your heart's content,
> > but you never do, why? �Because you don't have a clue about the JFK
> > assassination is why, or you choose to spread deliberate lies.-
>
> Excellent point Rob. The "debate me live" BS is just that----BS. These
> people show NO INTEREST in debating the "facts" as they call them in
> THIS forum and until they do, there is no need to take it to any other
> level.
>
> They can't debate the facts. They don't even own the WC volumes.
> That's why they never refer to them unless it includes a McAdams link.
>
> Accepting a challenge from losers like those is a waste of time.
>
> In a "live" debate, you'll be debating McAdams and Rahn. Not them.
>
> I WELCOME THE OPPORTUNITY.
>
> Yo(Momma)Harvey is full of shit.
>
> I made him loo0k SICK when he came into my Live Audio Chat Room.
>
> THAT's why he Never came back.
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm
Rossley you're a liar! YoHarvey debated you, he disagreed with
you...you red dotted him so he couldn't talk on the mic anymore...and
then when he started typing in text you bounced him. You couldn't
handle a debate...any debate. As soon as someone disagrees with you
you get vile. I've seen it over and over again EVERY SINGLE TIME I've
been in your pathetic chatroom. You keep inviting ppl on this group
and not one of them shows up....shows how much respect they have for
you and your ideas.
Not even your scum bag son Chico shows up in your room...and he's the
only support you have on here.
What a liar you are.
Ben Holmes
Gil Jesus says...
>
>On Apr 15, 9:48=EF=BF=BDpm, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com=
>>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> Debate me live, what is this guy's/girl's/it's problem? =EF=BF=BDYou run f=
>rom
>> debate everyday on this forum why would a LIVE debate be any
> content,
>> but you never do, why? =EF=BF=BDBecause you don't have a clue about the JF=
>K
>> assassination is why, or you choose to spread deliberate lies.-
>
>-----------
>Excellent point Rob. The "debate me live" BS is just that----BS. These
>people show NO INTEREST in debating the "facts" as they call them in
>THIS forum and until they do, there is no need to take it to any other
>level.
>
>They can't debate the facts. They don't even own the WC volumes.
>That's why they never refer to them unless it includes a McAdams link.
>
>Accepting a challenge from losers like those is a waste of time.
>
>In a "live" debate, you'll be debating McAdams and Rahn. Not them.
In a "live" debate, you can't point to the written record of the debate, as you
can here. Nor is it searchable over the Internet. I can well understand why
the LNT'ers & trolls would prefer a "live" debate.
justm...@gmail.com
> In article <72c78c29-9429-4025-ae5c-7734e0764...@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> Gil Jesus says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 15, 9:48=EF=BF=BDpm, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com=
>
> >wrote:
>
> >> Debate me live, what is this guy's/girl's/it's problem? =EF=BF=BDYou run f=
> >rom
> >> debate everyday on this forum why would a LIVE debate be any
> >> different? =EF=BF=BDWhy live? =EF=BF=BDYou can debate here to your heart's=
> > content,
> >> but you never do, why? =EF=BF=BDBecause you don't have a clue about the JF=
> >K
> >> assassination is why, or you choose to spread deliberate lies.-
>
> >-----------
> >Excellent point Rob. The "debate me live" BS is just that----BS. These
> >people show NO INTEREST in debating the "facts" as they call them in
> >THIS forum and until they do, there is no need to take it to any other
> >level.
>
> >They can't debate the facts. They don't even own the WC volumes.
> >That's why they never refer to them unless it includes a McAdams link.
>
> >Accepting a challenge from losers like those is a waste of time.
>
> >In a "live" debate, you'll be debating McAdams and Rahn. Not them.
>
> In a "live" debate, you can't point to the written record of the debate, as you
> can here. Nor is it searchable over the Internet. I can well understand why
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thats right Holmes because without your searching other peoples
information you know nothing. You have to hide behind your computer
and search for your answers. That is why the CT's won't debate live.
No guts, no glory....they have neither
tomnln
tomnln
"Ben Holmes" <ad...@khadaji.com> wrote in message
news:fu6al...@drn.newsguy.com...
In my Live audio Chat Room we can transfer ANY evidence/testimony to each
other.
tomnln
<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:42e24a61-9b5b-452d...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
INVITATION
I have a Live Audio Chat Room.
Download & use for FREE
Once logged on, select
1 Social Issues & Politics
2 Government & Politics
3 Scroll down to room called
Who Killed Kennedy.
We start every night between 8:00 p m - 9:00 p m e.s.t.
I offer a Forum to WCR supporters to convince us that Oswald was a Lone
Assassin.
Paltalk allows us to transfer files to one another instantly.
Any Exhibit of evidence, any specific testimony from:
Warren Report's 26 Volumes
Church Committee 14 Volumes
HSCA's 12 Volumes.
Look forward to seeing you there.
justm...@gmail.com
> <justme1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
robcap...@netscape.com
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
I don't need to look things up as I have most of it in my head, but
does YoHarvey? Of course not, so my guess is it wouldn't be him/her/
it doing the debate, it would be someone else. So what? The fact is
your theory has NO validity.
Who whining? Why don't you debate anyone? Or for starters, why don't
you do ONE post that actually discusses evidence in the case?
justm...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Talking to close minded imbeciles like you isn't worth wasting my
time, that's why. As for Yoharvey, you've guessed wrong once again.
The only time you Ct's shoot off your mouths is when your hiding
behind your computers. You have an excuse for everything and when
backed against a wall you turn off that switch and hide. In a live
debate you can't do that...you're going to have to argue your points
and explain them verbally. Something that none of you are intelligent
enough to do.
Personally, I could care less about debating anyone live or in
text...the only reason I challenged your alias bigot Jesus, was to
prove to him I'm not some 20 yr old named Joey. He ran. So let him
continue to call me Joey and make a bigger fool of himself. He's got
Healy sniffing right behind him falling for it too. Their both
fools...they always have been so this is nothing new.
Now you can continue to address your posts to Yoharvey...this topic,
just like the rest of them on here will go nowhere. Opinions are like
assholes, everyone has one.
Ben Holmes
robcap...@netscape.com says...
>
>On Apr 15, 10:57=A0pm, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 9:48=A0pm, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 15, 7:53=A0pm, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Apr 15, 7:44=A0pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > It was YoHarvey, under the screenname baileynme who claimed that the=
>
>> > > > Oswald rifle had no scope when found. Baileynme-spiffy-YoHarvey wrot=
>e:
>> > > > "The scope was NOT on the MC when it was found. It was laying
>> > > > alongside the weapon."
>>
>d
>>
>> > > > But a photo of Lt. Day in the TSBD picking the rifle up by the strap=
>
>> > > > SHOWS a scope ATTACHED:
>>
>> > > >http://pictures.aol.com/galleries/gjjmail/41602cXrkH0*ic1Lb0imwIK1Lw8=
>...
>>
>> > > > DEBATING SOMEONE THIS IGNORANT WOULD BE LIKE BEATING A POOR DUMB
>> > > > ANIMAL.
>>
>".
>>
>> > > He's so afraid to debate the subject, he will say and do ANYTHING to
>> > > avoid it.
>>
>>
>> > > Such a simple question. =A0Got an answer?
>>
>> > "Debate me LIVE and I'll explain the scope......deal?"
>>
>> > debate everyday on this forum why would a LIVE debate be any
>> > but you never do, why? =A0Because you don't have a clue about the JFK
>> > assassination is why, or you choose to spread deliberate lies.- Hide quo=
>ted text -
>>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Stop whining like a child crapper. Theres a big difference debating
>> live and hiding behind a computer copying and pasting half assed
>> articles and trying to state their facts. You, Chico, Holmes, Walt
>> couldn't survive in a live debate. You don't have time to go look
>> things up...read your pitiful articles and books that you come back
>> here and spew at everyone as facts. You're all a bunch of chickens. Yo
>> has debated a few people live...real researchers, not morons like you
>> and your little group of stooges. You'd rather hide behind your
>> computer and type your fingers to the bone or copy and paste bullshit.
>> You're famous for that.
>> Notice I didn't include Healy in your group....we can't understand his
>> typing I doubt we'd be able to understand his man of the wanna be hood
>> street talk. Now go put your jammies on child and have mommy tuck you
>
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>I don't need to look things up as I have most of it in my head, but
>does YoHarvey? Of course not, so my guess is it wouldn't be him/her/
>it doing the debate, it would be someone else. So what? The fact is
>your theory has NO validity.
>
>Who whining? Why don't you debate anyone? Or for starters, why don't
>you do ONE post that actually discusses evidence in the case?
If the troll wants to debate "live", he can also do it in person. I'm not hard
to find, but lies told in person just might have more serious consequences than
merely being pointed out.
justm...@gmail.com
> In article <0f50f51e-c962-4c27-bcc5-a85eaebc0...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
I highly doubt anyone is going to waste their money and fly to Calif
just to debate you Holmes. You aren't worth it.
but lies told in person just might have more serious consequences
than
> merely being pointed out.
What are you going to do? Send the lapdog in to bite them?
robcap...@netscape.com
Blah, blah, blah, you are talking to my hand. You CAN'T debate the
evidence since you have no idea what it is. Your long-winded cover is
shown for what it is, pure ingorance.
justm...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jesus/crapper...go out and find a job. You're a loser, childish little
imp. Failure to the max...now go play with the kids of which you sound
like a little whining one.
I'm sure you must have tons of CT books to copy and paste from...we
need some good laughs!
I don't debate fantasies which is what you live with daily. I won't
waste my time. You have proof of NOTHING you spew yet you continue to
sound like a broken record over and over again. Incase you haven't
noticed, NO ONE debates with you...they humiliate you which is all you
deserve. Now get lost!
aeffects
You waste your time here at least 20 times a day, Joey....
ROTFLMFAO ...(lurkers have noticed your non-topic ridiculous posts)
so......thusly our resident neo-nazi cum admitted lesbian
impersonator, Joey has spoketh... you've posted over 3,000 posts to
this board (in a few months, yet) and you still haven't addressed
topic material this USENET board addresses, other than JFK's name? Why
are you here, Joey? Doing penance, son?
justm...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
To bug the hell out of you Healy...and it's working ROFLMAO
Still waiting for the proof of your above lies, along with all the
other people waiting for you to prove your lies. Woof Woof....go
fetch!
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
don't need to look things up as I have most of it in my head, but
does YoHarvey? Of course not, so my guess is it wouldn't be him/her/
it doing the debate, it would be someone else. So what? The fact is
your theory has NO validity.
Who whining? Why don't you debate anyone? Or for starters, why don't
you do ONE post that actually discusses evidence in the case?
My theory? The WR is NOT theory. You are called a conspiracy
theorist for a reason!! EVERYTHING you speculate on is theory!
Unfortunately, you don't have the education or refinement to
understand what evidence is!! Simply admit you're a coward....admit
mommy pays your bills and do America a favor, die already.
As for Holmes, why must he have a record of a live debate? The debate
can be open to anybody who chooses to be enlightened. CT's are an
amusing but candidly ignorant breed. They FEAR open discussion.
Holmes proves that. He changes thread titles. He changes dialogue.
He runs in fear when he makes his ignorant statements and doesn't
respond whatsoever. In a live debate he can't hide!! And he knows it.
aeffects
it's the ONI upbringing -- stiltled our growth...
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Healy proves with each posting intelligence is as alien to him as a
good dinner. Eat the rats that frequent your apartment complex Healy.
Ben Holmes
aeffects says...
Indeed you *can* debate me live. But you'll face the consequences if you lie.
That's why you'll have to come and debate me in person. The consequences will
be painful.
The same offer is available to any troll or LNT'er. Simply be willing to face
the consequences. I'll be happy to arrange video or an audience.
robcap...@netscape.com
I have a job, a better one than a broken down alleged "IT" one too.
robcap...@netscape.com
This sums up better than anything I could say to show why a debate
with this entity would be a waste of time. Your beloved WCR is all
theory as NONE of it was proven in a court of law!! Don't you
understand how our judicial system works at all? OF course not, why
even bother asking.
"As for Holmes, why must he have a record of a live debate? The
debate can be open to anybody who chooses to be enlightened. CT's are
an amusing but candidly ignorant breed. They FEAR open discussion.
Holmes proves that. He changes thread titles. He changes dialogue.
He runs in fear when he makes his ignorant statements and doesn't
respond whatsoever. In a live debate he can't hide!! And he knows
it."
This IS open discussion! Well not really since you are incapable of
any real thoughts or ideas, but in theory it is supposed to be an open
discussion. He would be responding for you?
justm...@gmail.com
> In article <0b6df853-b4c6-4318-8fd7-621a9b4fa...@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text
And who the hell are you to determine what's a lie and what isn't
Holmes? The king of liars himself?
What are you going to do stumpy??? Kick the person in the knee cap or
send in your lapdog Healy to bite their ankle? You really are an
ignorant jerk...face the consequences LMFAO....what a dork.
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jesus/Robcap just doesn't get it. Simply over his head. He believes
because LHO died before trial, he isn't capable of
guilt......regardless of the overwhelming evidence. So, of course, he
has to LIE about the evidence. This doesn't change FACTS. Was OJ
innocent of the charges? No, of course not. He was found NOT GUILTY
based on the way the evidence was presented. Jesus/Robcap wants YOU
to believe Oswald was INNOCENT because he never stood trial. This in
essence is the curse of the CT misfits. They cannot even provide
enough evidence of ANY conspiracy to get ANY offical body to reopen
the case...and yet, he wants us ALL to believe in his course because
HE believes in. Proves he's even dumber than Holmes....if that's
possible.
Question: If Oswald had committed suicide, would he also be NOT
guilty based on the known evidence?
aeffects
man-oh-man, now you've done it.... I'll provide Hi-Def camera[s] for
your upcoming face-to-face encounter, you will be there right? I mean
what with you being ex-ONI, Vietnam Vet, a mass-der-bator and all....
we'll get the event on YouTube, you can show the entire Lone Nut world
your *stuff*...
muc...@gmail.com
> In article <0b6df853-b4c6-4318-8fd7-621a9b4fa...@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Describe the pain.
> The same offer is available to any troll or LNT'er. Simply be willing to face
> the consequences. I'll be happy to arrange video or an audience.
I certainly wouldn't mind watching you defend that *Yellow Legs*
theory of yours on camera and/or in front of a live audience. I'm just
hoping that excessive ROFLMAO'ing won't cause the old tummy to ache
too much :-)