Of "Slicky Boys" & "Shysters"
Brokedad
For most of those who have suffered the priviledge of an all expenses
paid, year long vacation in SE Asia, there are few who are unfamiliar
with the term "Slicky Boy".
Just as there are few who have lived to any extended length of age,
who have not witnessed exactly what a "Shyster" lawyer can accomplish.
Unfortunately, there are also those who have not had either experience
and therefore suffer severely from "Parrotonitis"*
* A little known inflamation of the brain which causes one to believe
in mythological things such as the truth of the WC; the revelations of
VDB, or possibly alternative delusions such as multiple assassins;
body snatchers and wound alteration specialists; etc; etc; etc;. and
thereafter continue to "Parrot" these theories irrelevant as to their
often complete lack of validity.
In that regards, "Slicky Boys" are pretty sharp and one must be up on
their toes to keep up with their activities.
Whereas, "Shyster Lawyers" are truly not that difficult to see through
and recognize.
=================================================================
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/gauthier.htm
Mr. GAUTHIER. The survey was made on May 24, 1964, by Robert H. West,
county surveyor, a licensed State land surveyor, located at 160 County
Courthouse, Dallas, Tex.
Mr. SPECTER. Have you brought the tracing of that survey with you
today?
Mr. GAUTHIER. I have; yes.
Mr. SPECTER. And have you brought a cardboard reproduction of that?
Mr. GAUTHIER. A copy made from the tracing; yes.
Mr. SPECTER. Would you produce the cardboard copy made from the
tracing for the inspection of the Commission at this time, please?
Mr. GAUTHIER. Yes.
Mr. SPECTER. Would you produce the tracing at this time, please?
Mr. GAUTHIER. Yes; the tracing is wrapped, and sealed in this
container.
Mr. SPECTER. Without breaking the seal, I will ask you if the
cardboard which has been set up here--may the record show it is a
large cardboard. I will ask you for the dimensions in just a minute.
Does the printing on the cardboard represent an exact duplication of
the tracing which you have in your hand?
Mr. GAUTHIER. Yes.
Mr. SPECTER. May it please the Commission, we will mark the tracing
Commission Exhibit No. 882, and not take it out, since the cardboard
represents it, and place Commission Exhibit No. 883 on the cardboard
drawing itself, and I would like to move for the admission into
evidence of both Exhibits Nos. 882 and 883.
The CHAIRMAN. They may be admitted.
==============================================
In some instances, the means and methods of operation of someone who
is attempting to "pull the wool" over one's eyes is so blatant, that
one often wonders exactly why no one else has even bothered to
question it.
And of course, even when someone points out the means and methods, it
does not insure that others will understand the significance of the
information.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?mode=searchResult&absPageId=519736
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?mode=searchResult&absPageId=223317
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=4272&relPageId=28
Of course, there are often "other doors" which must be opened in
order to understand exactly what some specific obfuscation is actually
about.
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh18/html/WH_Vol18_0017a.htm
And, whether one begins to understand what it is in fact all about, or
not, a rational thinking person certainly begins to appreciate that
someone is most certainly making an attempt to pull something over on
us:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/shaneyf2.htm
Mr. SHANEYFELT. Yes. Distance from the chalk mark on the back of the
stand-in for the President to the station C is 136.6
Distance to rifle in the window is 174.9 feet. The angle to the rifle
in the window based on the horizontal is 21b050. The distance to the
overpass is 350.9 feet, and the angle to the overpass is 0b012'.
This is on frame 207, Commission Exhibit No. 892.
Mr. SPECTER. Was an adjustment made on that position for the heights
of the automobiles?
Mr. SHANEYFELT. Yes.
Mr. SPECTER. What was the adjusted frame for the first view that the
marksman had of the President's stand-in coming out from under the
tree?
Mr. SHANEYFELT. That is frame 210 and has been marked as Commission
Exhibit No. 893 and represents the 10-inch adjustment for the
difference in the height of the car as compared with frame 207.
Mr. SHANEYFELT. Yes; that is the first point from this, and although
we are able to see in the films that there is no apparent reaction
from the President from 205 to 210, and as he disappears from behind
the signboard, we cannot estimate the reaction time.
Mr. SPECTER. When you say reaction time you mean?
Mr. SHANEYFELT. Of the President?
Mr. SPECTER. Reaction time from 205----
Representative FORD. To 210?
==========================================================
P.S. Time/Life, during their assassinatioin re-enactment and survey
work on 11/25/63 certainly appeared to have been able to see
something, as they had Mr. West survey in a location for JFK at the
time of the first shot fired.
The SS, during their assassination re-enactment and survey work on
December 2, 3, & 4th certainly appeared to have been able to see
something, as they had Mr. West survey in a location for JFK at the
time of impact for the first shot fired.
The FBI, during their assassination re-enactment and survey work on
2/7/64 certainly appeared to have been able to see something, as they
fully concurred with the SS as to the impact location for the first
shot fired.
Brokedad
> For most of those who have suffered the priviledge of an all expenses
> paid, year long vacation in SE Asia, there are few who are unfamiliar
> with the term "Slicky Boy".
>
> Just as there are few who have lived to any extended length of age,
> who have not witnessed exactly what a "Shyster" lawyer can accomplish.
>
> Unfortunately, there are also those who have not had either experience
> and therefore suffer severely from "Parrotonitis"*
>
> * A little known inflamation of the brain which causes one to believe
> in mythological things such as the truth of the WC; the revelations of
> VDB, or possibly alternative delusions such as multiple assassins;
> body snatchers and wound alteration specialists; etc; etc; etc;. and
> thereafter continue to "Parrot" these theories irrelevant as to their
> often complete lack of validity.
>
> In that regards, "Slicky Boys" are pretty sharp and one must be up on
> their toes to keep up with their activities.
>
> Whereas, "Shyster Lawyers" are truly not that difficult to see through
> and recognize.
>
>
> http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?mode=sear...
>
> http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=427...
>
> Of course, there are often "other doors" which must be opened �in
> order to understand exactly what some specific obfuscation is actually
> about.
>
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ngarchive/Altered_Evidence.pdf
Far better viewing!
Thanks John!
Brokedad
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yeah, they can learn that the Secret Service was obviously wrong
about
a few things.
Purvis, however, apparently thinks it's totally impossible for the SS
to have been incorrect in ANY way regarding its 1963 plat
maps....which MUST mean JFK was, indeed, shot at circa Z353 (per
Purvis).
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You "simpleton"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/simpleton
It was the Warren Commission that utilized James Altgen's testimony
as
proof that the LAST/THIRD shot did not miss.
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0070a.htm
They just did not bother to so inform you that James Altgens was some
40-feet away from the Z313 impact while Altgens himself testified
that
JFK was some 15-feet distance, directly in front of his location,
when
this LAST/THIRD shot impact occurred.
*Note: From the street curb at Altgens position to the center of Elm
St. directly in front of James Altgens, is 20-feet.
http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z350.jpg
Mr. ALTGENS - This would put me at approximately this area here,
which
would be about 15 feet from me at the time he was shot in the head--
about 15 feet from the car on the west side of the car--on the side
that Mrs. Kennedy was riding in the car.
Mr. ALTGENS - Yes. What made me almost certain that the shot came
from
behind was because at the time I was looking at the President, just
as
he was struck, it caused him to move a bit forward. He seemed as if
at
the time----well, he was in a position-- sort of immobile. He wasn't
upright. He was at an angle but when it hit him, it seemed to have
just lodged--it seemed as if he were hung up on a seat button or
something like that. It knocked him just enough forward that he came
right on down. There was flesh particles that flew out of the side of
his head in my direction from where I was standing,
Mr. ALTGENS - Because I didn't see who fired it. After the
Presidential car moved a little past me, I took another picture--now,
just let me back up here--I was prepared to make a picture at the
very
instant the President was shot. I had refocused to 15 feet because I
wanted a good closeup of the President and Mrs. Kennedy, and that's
why I know that it would be right at 15 feet, because I had
prefocused
in that area, and I had my camera almost to my eye when it happened
and that's as far as I got with my camera.
=========================================================
Specter to Earl, come in Earl:
Earl here, what's the problem?
Specter: We have a problem with Altgens.
Earl. What's the problem?
Specter: He observed the last/third shot strike JFK.
Earl: No problem, don't call him to testify.
Specter: Tried that! His newspaper wrote up a big article as to how
we did not even bother to call such an important witness as he was, to
testify.
Earl: OK then, just don't bother to call him where all the others can
here what he has to say, and not unlike several others, we will not
call him until after the "DRAFT" of the report has been turned in and
all of the others have gone home.
Specter: Sounds good to me, what else?
Earl: Like several other important witness's such as Emmett Hudson
who clearly observed the SECOND SHOT impact to the head of JFK, we
will have only one person question them after we have turned in the
DRAFT REPORT and then most other members of the Commission will never
see what they said.
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh7/html/WC_Vol7_0283b.htm
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh7/html/WC_Vol7_0262a.htm
Specter: Boy are you smart! Just goes to show why you are a Supreme
Court Justice and I am just a "wannabe" US Senator.
Oh Yeah! There is another problem! Altgens is clearly seen in the
Zapruder film, way down Elm St. past the point of the Z313/Second Shot
impact point.
Earl: No Problem! Just do not publish sufficient frames of the Z-
film to show where Altgens was standing.
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh18/html/WH_Vol18_0047b.htm
Specter: Boy are you smart! But, there is another problem.
Earl: Go ahead, but I am getting tired of this!
Specter: Altgens took an excellent photograph which we have
identified as having been taken at approximately Zapruder frame#255,
and anyone with any sense at all can figure out his location from this
film.
Earl: Well then, just "crop" the photo, and make a re-enactment photo
which looks similar and is "close" and we can most certainly fool most
of the Parrotheads with that.
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh18/html/WH_Vol18_0054a.htm
Specter: OK, but!
Earl: Now what?
Specter: Some may ask and attempt to find out where Altgens was
located.
Earl: No Problem! Tell them a lie, and not unlike "sheepels" &
"Parrots", they will believe whatever we feed them.
Specter: Do you think that everyone is that dumb?
Earl: It only takes a couple who know nothing and are willing to
"PARROT" whatever we say.
Specter: OK. Can I count on your support when I decide to graduate
to "Super-Shyster" status?
Earl: Most certainly, assuming that you can pull this one off.
Mr. ALTGENS - This would put me at approximately this area here, which
would be about 15 feet from me at the time he was shot in the head--
about 15 feet from the car on the west side of the car--on the side
that Mrs. Kennedy was riding in the car.
Mr. LIEBELER - You have indicated a spot along the side of Elm Street
which I have marked with a No. 3; is that correct?
Mr. ALTGENS - Yes, sir.
Mr. LIEBELER - Did you have any idea where the sound came from when
you were standing there at No. 3 on Commission Exhibit No. 354?
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0487a.htm
Sorry, but I do not see James Altgens (#3) along in here as shown on
the above photo.
http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z285.jpg
However, if one looks at about the "St" in the word Street, they will
most likely find James Altgens, just as Mr. Hudson stated, "pretty
close to even with these steps".
http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z349.jpg
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/hudson.htm
Mr. LIEBELER - How many shots did you here altogether?
Mr. HUDSON - Three.
Mr. LIEBELER - Three shots?
Mr. HUDSON - Yes, sir.
Mr. LIEBELER - Are you sure about that?
Mr. HUDSON - Yes, sir.
Mr. LIEBELER - You say that it was the second shot that hit him in the
head; is that right?
Mr. HUDSON - Yes; I do believe that - I know it was.
Mr. LIEBELER - You saw him hit in the head, there wasn't any question
in your mind about that, was there?
Mr. HUDSON - No, sir.
Mr. LIEBELER - And after you saw him hit in the head, did you here
another shot?
Mr. HUDSON - Yes, sir.
Mr. HUDSON - Yes; so right along about even with these steps, pretty
close to even with this here, the last shot was fired - somewhere
right along in there.
Mr. LIEBELER - But you think the President had already been hit in the
head by the time the third shot was fired?
Mr. HUDSON - He had been hit twice, so Parkland Hospital said. He was
hit in the neck one time and in the head one time.
Mr. LIEBELER - You say it was the second shot that hit him in the
head?
Mr. HUDSON - Yes.
Mr. LIEBELER - And you saw the President get hit by what you heard as
the second shot?
Mr. HUDSON - Yes.
Mr. HUDSON - Well there was a young fellow, oh, I would judge his age
about in his late twenties. He said he had been looking for a place to
park and he walked up there and he said he finally just taken a place
over there in one of them parking lots, and he come on down there and
said he worked over there on Industrial and me and him both just sat
there first on those steps. When the motorcade turned off of Houston
onto Elm, we got up and stood up, me and him both. He was on the left
side and I was on the right and so the first shot rung out and, of
course, I didn't realize it was a shot, what was taking place right at
that present time, and when the second one rung out, the motorcade had
done got further on down Elm, and you see, I was trying to get a good
look at President Kennedy. I happened to be looking right at him when
that bullet hit him - the second shot.
Mr. LIEBELER - That was when the bullet hit him in the head; is that
correct?
Mr. HUDSON - Yes; it looked like it ht him somewhere along about a
little bit behind the ear and a little bit above the ear.
Mr. LIEBELER - On the right-hand side or the left-hand side?
Mr. HUDSON - Right hand.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brokedad
>
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh7/html/WC_Vol7...
>
> Specter: �Boy are you smart! �Just goes to show why you are a Supreme
>
> read more �- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=13896
Robin;
Hope these photo's clarify a few things.
They are fully size 8X10 and consume a lot of attachment space.
Therefore, I will post one or two and allow them to set for a day or
so.
Please let me know when you have sufficiently reviewed them.
Brokedad
>
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh7/html/WC_Vol7...
>
> Specter: �Boy are you smart! �Just goes to show why you are a Supreme
> Court Justice and I am just a "wannabe" US Senator.
> Oh Yeah! �There is another problem! �Altgens is clearly seen in the
> Zapruder film, way down Elm St. past the point of the Z313/Second Shot
> impact point.
>
> Earl: �No Problem! �Just do not publish sufficient frames of the Z-
> film to show where Altgens was standing.
>
>
> Specter: �Boy are you smart! �But, there is another problem.
>
> Earl: �Go ahead, but I am getting tired of this!
>
> Specter: �Altgens took an excellent photograph which we have
> identified as having been taken at approximately Zapruder frame#255,
> and anyone with any sense at all can figure out his location from this
> film.
>
> Earl: �Well then, just "crop" the photo, and make a re-enactment photo
> which looks similar and is "close" and we can most certainly fool most
> of the Parrotheads with that.
>
>
> Specter: �OK, but!
>
> Earl: �Now what?
>
> Specter: �Some may ask and attempt to find out where Altgens was
> located.
>
> Earl: �No Problem! �Tell them a lie, and not unlike "sheepels" &
> "Parrots", they will believe whatever we feed them.
>
> Specter: �Do you think that everyone is that dumb?
>
> Earl: �It only takes a couple who know nothing and are willing to
> "PARROT" whatever we say.
>
> Specter: �OK. �Can I count on your support when I decide to �graduate
> to "Super-Shyster" status?
>
> Earl: �Most certainly, assuming that you can pull this one off.
>
> Mr. ALTGENS - This would put me at approximately this area here, which
> would be about 15 feet from me at the time he was shot in the head--
> about 15 feet from the car on the west side of the car--on the side
> that Mrs. Kennedy was riding in the car.
> Mr. LIEBELER - You have indicated a spot along the side of Elm Street
> which I have marked with a No. 3; is that correct?
> Mr. ALTGENS - Yes, sir.
>
> Mr. LIEBELER - Did you have any idea where the sound came from when
> you were standing there at No. 3 on Commission Exhibit No. 354?
>
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=13894&pid=160837&st=0&#entry160837entry160837
Specter: Hey Earl it's me. We've got another problem.
Earl: I am beginning to believe that you are a duffas who is going to
get us all caught, but go ahead.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=duffas
Specter: It's the FBI!
Earl: OK! So what about them?
Specter: There spectrographic laboratory analyst examined JFK's coat
and fully identified the two seperate bullet holes which go through
the coat.
Earl: OK! So exactly how was it that he identified them?
Specter: Well, the lower hole which was created by CE399 and measured
1/2 inch in size and which correlated with the 1/2 inch hole in JFK's
shirt, he identified; took spectrographic sampling and identified
copper in the surrounding fabric.
Earl: OK! Big deal, we knew that CE399 struck JFK, so what?
Specter: Well, he also identifiex the smaller 1/4 inch hole up at the
lower edge of the collar which went through the coat and liner on an
oblique angle and was the result of the third shot impact bullet which
struck JFK directly in front of James Altgens. (who we have already
made to disappear in the film as well as moving his location on paper)
Earl: OK! Did he run spectrographic analysis on any part of the upper/
1/4 inch hole at the coat collar?
Specter: Yep, he did!
Earl: And!
Specter: It showed traces of copper also.
Earl: Oh S**T!, what else?
Specter: Well, he took a "control" sample from the side of the coat
for the lower/CE399 hole.
Earl: What about the coat collar hole?
Specter: Well, he took a "control" sample from under the coat collar,
directly adjacent to this hole.
Earl: So, what is it that you need from me?
Specter: We need you to exert your influence with the FBI & Hoover to
help cover this up.
Earl: Not me! Do you know how much I hate that SOB Hoover? He and LBJ
are like "Butt-Buddies" and he was the one who also provided LBJ with
that information about the "Mexico City" affair which that Bast**d LBJ
utilized to blackmail me into this mess with in the beginning.
Specter: You mean the "Oswald" in Mexico City affair and the death and
destruction of millions of people through nuclear war?
Earl: No! You idiot! I am talking about "MY AFFAIR" in Mexico City
during one of my many trips down there when I was Governor of
California and visiting my good friend the President of Mexico.
Hope you don't think that we merely attended the Horse Races while
down there.
But that Bast**d Hoover had his spies everywhere and has been
blackmailing me ever since in regards to "a little incident in Mexico
City".
Are you so stupid that you think I give a s**t about a few million
people being killed by nuclear explosion, and that LBJ could have
blackmailed me with such an asinine threat?
http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/..._in_Mexico_City
"what Hoover told me about a little incident in Mexico City."
Specter: Oh!
Earl: Don't bother me anymore with this as I have nothing to say to
that blackmailing Hoover Bast**d. One can not even go to Mexico City
and get a little "nooky" without his spying bast**ds running back to
Hoover with it.
You need to call Gerald Ford. Don't know what all Hoover has on him
but he is most certainly a "Kiss-A**" to Hoover.
Maybe he can point out to the Bast**d that we also know about his/the
FBI's phony assassination re-enactment of 2/7/64, and let him know
that if he does not help us on this "coat issue", that we will make
certain that everyone knows that that purported SS Assassination Re-
enactment survey report with the date 2/7/64 at the bottom of the page
is really a "Hoover & LBJ" lie.
They want to play that game, we can play it too. And, be certain and
get that survey entered into evidence somewhere, so that we always
have it to hit them over the head with if necessary.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/simmons.htm
Mr. SIMMONS. I refer to the survey plat which is dated December 5,
1963.
Mr. EISENBERG. And how were you supplied with that?
Mr. SIMMONS. To the best of my knowledge, you gave it to one of the
employees in my office.
Mr. EISENBERG. Mr. Chairman, this is a plat made by a licensed
surveyor of the area immediately adjoining the Texas School Book
Depository. I would like to introduce it into evidence solely to show
the basis which Mr. Simmons was using in his test, and not for the
truth, of the measurements which are shown in here.
Mr. McCLOY. It may be received.
Mr. EISENBERG. That would be Commission 585.
(The document referred to was marked Commission Exhibit No. 585 and
received in evidence.)
Specter: OK! Great Idea! Boy are you Smart!
Earl: You are own your own on this one! Be creative, think "sneaky,
low-life politician", you will need the training if you are to
continue your advancement in the field of politics.
P.S. "MY AFFAIR"/aka "little incident" in Mexico City is My Affair. It
is none of that Bast**d Hoover, or that blackmailling LBJ's business.
Especially with his record.
Brokedad
>
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh7/html/WC_Vol7...
>
> Specter: �Boy are you smart! �Just goes to show why you are a Supreme
>
> read more �- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++
Yeah, they can learn that the Secret Service was obviously wrong
> about
> a few things.
>
> Purvis, however, apparently thinks it's totally impossible for the SS
> to have been incorrect in ANY way regarding its 1963 plat
> maps....which MUST mean JFK was, indeed, shot at circa Z353 (per
> Purvis).
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++
Anyone here (other than Parrot & Partner) who is of the completely
ignorant assumption that any evidence exists which supports
the completely asinine assumption that JFK was struck when he was
directly lateral to the lampost, as demonstrated in this, the
FBI "fudged" survey plat of 2/7/64 in which the actual location of the
Z313 impact was deleted?
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/40/4074-001.gif
For those who do not subscribe to the "Un-Educated" Forum:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=13896&st=0&gopid=160845&
Tom.
I have " UPLOADED " your Photo's to my website Gallery.
Tom Purvis Collection:
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/galle...ls.php?album=65
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=65
>
justm...@gmail.com
>
> read more »
Do you always carry on threads with yourself like this? Did it ever
occur to you no one cares about this thread or what you have to say
and that's why there are no comments or responses??
If we wanted to read your opinion we'd go to the forum it was
originally posted on. Questions?
Brokedad
wrote:
1. From confirmed email response, you are incorrect.
2. Exactly how many years have you been ignorant of the facts in the
assassination? Exacly how many more years do you intend to remain
ignorant of the facts of the assassination?
3. Exactly why are you wasting your (as well as my) time posting a
response if no one reads this?
Questions?
4. Exactly why would I have questions from someone who quite
obviously knows little in regards to the facts of the assassination
of JFK as well as the facts related to how the WC pulled the wool over
your (and a lot of other persons) eyes.
In event that I wanted "ignorant" advice, I would pay attention to
those who continue to post on the subject matter and yet have done
little or no empirical research of their own.
5. Lastly, I did not come here to "debate" the forensic; ballistic;
pathological; and physical facts, as I pretty well long ago
determined
exactly what the factual truths were in these regards.
Therefore, I could care less if someone does or does not respond, as
the purpose is not for a "debate".
And, the last time that I checked, the "Education Forum" was by
invitation only.
Upset because you have not been invited? Might tell you something in
regards to what you actually have to offer!
justm...@gmail.com
Yawn....If I wanted your opinion I'd ask for it, go back to talking to
yourself...you're basically boring.
justm...@gmail.com
Oh btw, I already am a member of the Education forum...I just read and
laugh. I've been a member for years. I've also been a member of Lancer
for years....yawnnnnnnnnnnn go back to your boring conversation with
yourself.
Brokedad
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Oh btw, I already am a member of the Education forum...I just read and
> laugh. I've been a member for years. I've also been a member of Lancer
> for years....yawnnnnnnnnnnn go back to your boring conversation with
> yourself.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well! Hopefully you will cease to waste my time here in response, as
my cerebral capacity continues to
decrease with age and the remaining capacity needs to be retained for
items of some importance.
However, you might want to take a good gander back at the Education
Forum and read up on exactly
what constitutes an "Ignorant" person.
Are you attempting to get your name entered onto the 2009 "BONEHEAD of
the YEAR" finalist listing?
No chance!
One has to at least demonstrate that the have some knowledge of the
assassination. Even if that knowledge
is incorrect.
justm...@gmail.com
SEEMS NO ONE ELSE IS BOTHERING WITH YOUR TIME BUT ME, AND BEING THE
PIG HEADED EGOTIST YOU ARE YOU KEEP RESPONDING LOL....JUMP PURVIS
JUMP!
However, you might want to take a good gander back at the Education
Forum and read up on exactly
what constitutes an "Ignorant" person.
ALREADY KNOW THAT ANSWER, YOU, GIL JESUS, BEN HOLMES, WALT, ROBCRAP,
ETC. ETC.
Are you attempting to get your name entered onto the 2009 "BONEHEAD of
the YEAR" finalist listing?
HEALY ALREADY HAS THAT TITLE AROUND HERE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE
NOMINATED FOR SECOND PLACE?
No chance!
One has to at least demonstrate that the have some knowledge of the
assassination. Even if that knowledge
is incorrect.
YOU'VE ACCOMPLISHED THAT WELL WITH YOUR INCORRECT KNOWLEDGE.
NOW CONSIDERING I'VE WASTED MY TIME TRYING TO SHOW YOU THAT YOU ARE
TALKING TO YOURSELF AND NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY, YOU CAN GO
BACK TO COPYING AND PASTING YOUR COMMENTS TO OTHERS FROM OTHER FORUMS.
I HAVE BETTER THINGS TO DO AT THE MOMENT. YOU'RE NOT ONLY IGNORANT,
YOU'RE A WASTE OF BANDWIDTH. AS HEALY LOVES TO SAY "CARRY ON TOOTS!"