Who Matters to the CIA?

[Tom Keske]

< Jason Burke wrote:
< Yeah. You're so important that the CIA, FBI, KGB, and everyone else
< watches your every move. I guess that's nothing close to paranoia.

Jason, you are royal asshole. You don't have the slightest
idea of my life story, but that doesn't stop you from being opinionated.

I've been long connected with some of the leading
"AIDS conspiracy" authors.

I've knowm of other people connected to AIDS conspiracy theory
who disappeared from the face of the earth, or likely got
"suicided", much less watched or harassed.

It was a 25-year veteran of the CIA who gave me
the first clue about the shady origins of AIDS.
That guy, Ralph McGehee, has lengthy articles on the web
about the harassment that he was endured. Mainstream
media ignores it all completely, in spite of his undeniable
credentials.

AIDS origin isn't even the biggest issue having
to do with myself and CIA. Of course, someone as
na�ve and clueless as ourself cannot imagine your
wonderful governing *doing* such a thing.

If you had more of a clue, you would totally
expect such things from them, as perfectly
natural and predictable.

You also lack the perspective that FBI under Hoover
had dossiers on about a million Americans. About
1 in every 200. They spied upon and harassed nonviolent
black civil rights activists, even ones who weren't
educated, or millionaires, or leaders, or expressing the opinion
that outfits like the CIA are infested with sleazy
criminals, scum of the earth, and killers who can
only be dealt with through force.

A poor black activist would have a much better
idea potentially than a milk-sopped slice of
WonderBread like you, who probably votes
Republican and is representing no threatening
ideas whatever to the political establishment.

Fortunately, I appear to be getting "helped"
in my cause in the shadows of the intelligence
world, which eventually will probably
start blowing all your minds as it starts getting
too obvious for even you and your propaganda to deny.

A bit like global warming. It might be a slow process,
but reality eventually catches up with the deniers
and doubters.

YOU are unimportant to the CIA perhaps because you
don't hit on any of the correct theories that would
make them uncomfortable. I'm sure that they are as
pleased with vocal lone-nutters as the Nazis
would have been with a blond, blued-eyed
Good German.

Tom Keske

[Tom Keske]

<"I've been long connected with some of the leading
< "AIDS conspiracy" authors.

And by the way, "AIDS Conspiracy" is intimately
connected with the JFK assassination, which is one
of reasons why I am here and why all this means
something to me, personally.

What is the JFK assassination to you, and why
do you spend so much energy on it? Anyone
without a good answer is under suspicion of
being a cover-up artist.

No need to take my word on "AIDS Conspiracy/ JFK"
link. Is good explanation in "Dr. Mary's Monkey"
by Ed Haslam, about the Kennedy-esque shady
death of Dr. Mary Sherman, a cancer
(and probably biowar-connected) researcher.

Tom Keske

[Tom Keske]

wonderful governing *doing* such a thing.

governMENT. Too many typos, not enough time.

[Ben Holmes]

In article <8gU%r.423$Wo5...@newsfe21.iad>, Tom Keske says...

Still running from the evidence in this case, eh kook?

Of course, to your credit - you actually *mention* JFK once in a while. There
are some kooks on this forum that I understand never do.

But still, inquiring minds want to know... why do you continue to refuse to give
the description of the original bullet wound in JFK's throat?

Since you clearly thought that the official position of the government was that
JFK had been shot from the front, you obviously know virtually nothing about
this case.

But go ahead and keep illustrating your ignorance...


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com

[Ben Holmes]

In article <WkU%r.185$UI4...@newsfe12.iad>, Tom Keske says...

>
>
>
><"I've been long connected with some of the leading
>< "AIDS conspiracy" authors.
>
>And by the way, "AIDS Conspiracy" is intimately
>connected with the JFK assassination, which is one
>of reasons why I am here and why all this means
>something to me, personally.
>
>What is the JFK assassination to you, and why
>do you spend so much energy on it? Anyone
>without a good answer is under suspicion of
>being a cover-up artist.

What is the JFK assassination to you, and why have you illustrated that you know
virtually nothing about it?

Was it a poor education?

Were you asleep during History 101?

>No need to take my word on "AIDS Conspiracy/ JFK"
>link. Is good explanation in "Dr. Mary's Monkey"
>by Ed Haslam, about the Kennedy-esque shady
>death of Dr. Mary Sherman, a cancer
>(and probably biowar-connected) researcher.
>
>Tom Keske

And yes, *still* no description of the original wound in JFK's throat. Rather
cowardly of you, isn't it?

[Tom Keske]

< And yes, *still* no description of the original
< wound in JFK's throat. Rather cowardly of you, isn't it?

No description? OK. The wound in Kennedy's throat
looked like a brilliant crimson red devil, a bright red bouquet
of roses for America's funeral. Redder than
the redneck of Lyndon Baines Johnson. Redder than
the bloody hands of the Nixon burglar/JFK killers. Redder than the sea
of red ink that Ronald Reagan created though military spending.
Redder than your pinkish-white buttocks will be when I get
done spanking them.

[Tom Keske]

< But still, inquiring minds want to know... why do you continue to refuse
to give
< the description of the original bullet wound in JFK's throat?

Please refer to the aforementioned vivid description.

[Ben Holmes]

In article <kEU%r.264$SZ3...@newsfe06.iad>, Tom Keske says...

[Ben Holmes]

In article <vFU%r.186$UI4...@newsfe12.iad>, Tom Keske says...

And yes, *still* no description of the original wound in JFK's throat. Rather
cowardly of you, isn't it?

[Bill Clarke]

In article <8gU%r.423$Wo5...@newsfe21.iad>, Tom Keske says...
>
>

>< Jason Burke wrote:
>< Yeah. You're so important that the CIA, FBI, KGB, and everyone else
>< watches your every move. I guess that's nothing close to paranoia.
>
>Jason, you are royal asshole. You don't have the slightest
>idea of my life story, but that doesn't stop you from being opinionated.
>
>I've been long connected with some of the leading
>"AIDS conspiracy" authors.
>
>I've knowm of other people connected to AIDS conspiracy theory
>who disappeared from the face of the earth, or likely got
>"suicided", much less watched or harassed.
>
>It was a 25-year veteran of the CIA who gave me
>the first clue about the shady origins of AIDS.
>That guy, Ralph McGehee, has lengthy articles on the web
>about the harassment that he was endured. Mainstream
>media ignores it all completely, in spite of his undeniable
>credentials.

Ralph McGehee posted to an old Vietnam War group that we had long ago. He was a
flaming nut job. Nice enough guy but still a flaming nut job.

Bill Clarke

[mainframetech]

On Aug 30, 9:23 pm, "Tom Keske" <ptke...@comcast.net> wrote:
> wonderful governing *doing* such a thing.
>
> governMENT.   Too many typos, not enough time.

I wondered if you had AIDS, and now you've verified it. My joint
position with both the FBI and CIA puts me in place to let you know
that we have not the slightest interest in you and hope you will fade
away soon. We have actually thrown your file away as useless. Your
name had been stricken from the lists around the world to make room
for serious offenders.

Chris

[tom...@cox.net]

PERHAPS JASON HAS A "PERSONAL INTEREST" IN THE aids COMMUNITY ! ! !

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

[Jason Burke]

On 8/31/2012 11:40 AM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> PERHAPS JASON HAS A "PERSONAL INTEREST" IN THE aids COMMUNITY ! ! !
>

Nice try, Rossfuck.

> "Tom Keske" <ptk...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> < Jason Burke wrote:
>> < Yeah. You're so important that the CIA, FBI, KGB, and everyone else
>> < watches your every move. I guess that's nothing close to paranoia.
>>
>> Jason, you are royal asshole. You don't have the slightest
>> idea of my life story, but that doesn't stop you from being opinionated.
>>

Yawn. I DO know Keske's a paranoid idiot.

>> I've been long connected with some of the leading
>> "AIDS conspiracy" authors.

Good for you! I'll bet your mommy is so proud! I KNOW Rossfuck is!

Ah, so your a paranoid idiot who's hung up on assholes. I guess I coulda
guessed that.

>>
>> I've knowm of other people connected to AIDS conspiracy theory
>> who disappeared from the face of the earth, or likely got
>> "suicided", much less watched or harassed.
>>

Sure you do. Sure you do.

>> It was a 25-year veteran of the CIA who gave me
>> the first clue about the shady origins of AIDS.
>> That guy, Ralph McGehee, has lengthy articles on the web
>> about the harassment that he was endured. Mainstream
>> media ignores it all completely, in spite of his undeniable
>> credentials.

Yawn.

>>
>> AIDS origin isn't even the biggest issue having
>> to do with myself and CIA. Of course, someone as
>> na�ve and clueless as ourself cannot imagine your
>> wonderful governing *doing* such a thing.
>>

Yawn. I'm still going with 'you are incredibly paranoid'. And from other
comments you've made here, you are also full of yourself.

NOT a good combo!

>> If you had more of a clue, you would totally
>> expect such things from them, as perfectly
>> natural and predictable.
>>

Like those monsters in your closet?

>> You also lack the perspective that FBI under Hoover
>> had dossiers on about a million Americans. About
>> 1 in every 200. They spied upon and harassed nonviolent
>> black civil rights activists, even ones who weren't
>> educated, or millionaires, or leaders, or expressing the opinion
>> that outfits like the CIA are infested with sleazy
>> criminals, scum of the earth, and killers who can
>> only be dealt with through force.

And this history has to deal with you just how?

>>
>> A poor black activist would have a much better
>> idea potentially than a milk-sopped slice of
>> WonderBread like you, who probably votes
>> Republican and is representing no threatening
>> ideas whatever to the political establishment.
>>

What the f*ck are you talking about?

>> Fortunately, I appear to be getting "helped"
>> in my cause in the shadows of the intelligence
>> world, which eventually will probably
>> start blowing all your minds as it starts getting
>> too obvious for even you and your propaganda to deny.
>>

I think it's not minds you're worried about blowing.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

>> A bit like global warming. It might be a slow process,
>> but reality eventually catches up with the deniers
>> and doubters.
>>

Funny, 30 years ago the big thing was what are we going to do about
global cooling.

>> YOU are unimportant to the CIA perhaps because you
>> don't hit on any of the correct theories that would
>> make them uncomfortable. I'm sure that they are as

Or maybe because I'm not a paranoid lunatic? Ya think.

>> pleased with vocal lone-nutters as the Nazis
>> would have been with a blond, blued-eyed
>> Good German.
>>

Ah, so you've just flat out admitted you've lost ALL arguments. Remember
the old days of ARPANET and such? You know, mentioning / comparing those
who don't agree with you to Hitler / the Nazis. The sure sign you've lost.


>> Tom Keske
>

[Tom Keske]

"Ben Holmes" wrote in message news:k1p45...@drn.newsguy.com...

< What is the JFK assassination to you, and why have you illustrated that
you know
< virtually nothing about it?

< Was it a poor education?
< Were you asleep during History 101?

History in school is propaganda. I am coming to the conclusion
that your real agenda must be to cover-up the truth of the
JFK assassination, while only pretending to be interested
in it. I have explained some of why the assassination is
of personal significance to me. You have not answered that
direct question, concerning yourself, which is highly suspicious
because you have self-identified as Far-Right and the
Right has always been hateful of the entire Kennedy name.

You would have to be practically insane to deny the obvious,
that the Right in one way another is the lead suspect.

The CIA, whom Bobby Kennedy immediately suspected,
was right-wing. Nixon was right-wing. Bush was right-wing.
The Cuban exiles were right-wing.

Suspects, all. A Devil's Advocate could propagandize that
LBJ was "liberal", but it would be pure propaganda.
The whole reason that LBJ was on the ticket in the
first place, in spite of neither JFK no RFK liking him was for
"balance" on the right. The GOP Right would have preferred
their own, like Nixon, but would have been happy to have
a temporary substitute of next-best, in LBJ. A war-monger.
Cozy with right-wing Texas oilmen.

LBJ did not plan the murder of JFK,
The murder of JFK was merely planned on *behalf* of LBJ.

Two different things, entirely. Only the CIA could have
pulled the thing off in the style that it was pulled off.
Not Mafia. Not Russians. Not Cubans.

Anyone who cannot see that is a na�ve ass or a liar.

< And yes, *still* no description of the original wound in JFK's throat.
Rather
< cowardly of you, isn't it?

You are as bat-shit crazy as that other Holmes. I think that
you are really only here to harass anyone who gets
too close to the truth, of right-wing, GOP partisan politics
being central to the JFK assassination.

[Tom Keske]

< And yes, *still* no description of the original wound in JFK's throat.
Rather
< cowardly of you, isn't it?

You are insane, and not even in an entertaining way.

[Tom Keske]

.

< I wondered if you had AIDS, and now you've verified it. My joint
< position with both the FBI and CIA puts me in place to let you know
< that we have not the slightest interest in you and hope you will fade
< away soon. We have actually thrown your file away as useless.

Do not have AIDS, thank you.

The CIA doesn't really have choice about interested or not.
When someone writes a poem about malfunctioning control
rods at a nuclear reactor, and mentions a specific reactor,
and that reactor has a control rod malfunction, they
have no choice but to be "interested". They would be
negligent and derelict in their duties, and should be summarily
fired, if they were not.

When things of that order start happening repeatedly, they
would *know* that there is something more than coincidence.

Ironic that I have nothing to hide. They do. I've committed
no crimes, but still hip-deep in some kind of intrigue.

Some of these things that I have been saying can be verified
by web-search. I have already said that I would take a
polygraph about anything that I ever say, for anyone
at all who wanted to arrange it.

I can see it coming, the day of reversal, when people
who would not believe that I had any possible involvement
at all, will refuse to believe that I did *not* have any actual
participation in the activities, just being done from shadows
apparently for the purpose of punctuating the points that
I was trying to make, which apparently had the whole-hearted
endorsement of some powerful and shadowy groups or
individuals.

I wouldn't be the least surprised if you really *did*
have connection with CIA and only pretending to
joke about it. They would hurl sarcastic crap and
ridicule while knowing full well that everything
that I said was accurate. That is the way that they
operate. Have observed the games in action,
for decades.

Some of the shadows have been impressive enough
that I am willing to take on the bastards in all their
power and treachery. I could get killed at any time,
I am very highly aware, and have been repeatedly
threatened, but they are really in the same boat.

A bit like a Cold-War standoff, eyeball-to-eyeball.

Tom Keske

[Tom Keske]

"
< Ralph McGehee posted to an old Vietnam War group that we had long ago. He
was a
< flaming nut job. Nice enough guy but still a flaming nut job.

Bullshit. A typical smear-job of propaganda shit-artists.

His CIAbase was well-respected by even mainstream journalists.

His views were relatively bland and tame, IMHO.

If I were to criticize him for anything, it would be for
being so incredibly na�ve like a Boy Scout in believing
initially in the nobility of the great war against communism.

He could not see it as the exercise in rich-man's paranoia
and ambition for ruthless global dominance, that it
really was.

I also was not able to interest him in taking up the
AIDS issue, even though his own CIABase had opened
my eyes to it. I couldn't get it across to him that I
had experience harassment has blatantly as he had.

I thought that he was ego-tripping on the Ralph
McGehee Show, a one-man show.

But I respect him at least for being an intelligent,
articulate man with a conscience, which is more
than I can say for any of the BS-artists on this
newsgroup.

Tom Keske

[Tom Keske]

< Good for you! I'll bet your mommy is so proud! I KNOW Rossfuck is

What a snotty kid you are. "Mommy" has been dead for more than
a decade.

You have to watch those bitter old men who are wiser than you.
They eventually get a point of having nothing left to lose, and
or to protect, like you and your goddam mommy.

Life is ugly and cheap and meaningless, a random rat-fuck
just waiting to happen. Don't make me come over there
and prove it to you.

[Bill Clarke]

In article <NPd0s.345$xV....@newsfe14.iad>, Tom Keske says...

>
>
>
>"
>< Ralph McGehee posted to an old Vietnam War group that we had long ago. He
>was a
>< flaming nut job. Nice enough guy but still a flaming nut job.
>
>Bullshit. A typical smear-job of propaganda shit-artists.

Horseshit. I stated the fact which is true at the time he was posting to
alt.war.vietnam. I like Ralph ok but he was still a nut.

>His CIAbase was well-respected by even mainstream journalists.
>
>His views were relatively bland and tame, IMHO.
>
>If I were to criticize him for anything, it would be for
>being so incredibly na�ve like a Boy Scout in believing
>initially in the nobility of the great war against communism.
>
>He could not see it as the exercise in rich-man's paranoia
>and ambition for ruthless global dominance, that it
>really was.

More horseshit from the 1960s.

>I also was not able to interest him in taking up the
>AIDS issue, even though his own CIABase had opened
>my eyes to it. I couldn't get it across to him that I
>had experience harassment has blatantly as he had.
>
>I thought that he was ego-tripping on the Ralph
>McGehee Show, a one-man show.
>
>But I respect him at least for being an intelligent,
>articulate man with a conscience, which is more
>than I can say for any of the BS-artists on this
>newsgroup.

There are lots of intelligent men out there that are not jobs. Intelligence
doesn't denote wisdom.

Bill Clarke


>Tom Keske
>

[Jason Burke]

On 8/31/2012 6:53 PM, Tom Keske wrote:
>
>
>
> < Good for you! I'll bet your mommy is so proud! I KNOW Rossfuck is
>
> What a snotty kid you are. "Mommy" has been dead for more than
> a decade.

Suicide, undoubtedly.

> You have to watch those bitter old men who are wiser than you.

Get the email about MIT in 3.5 years, fuckhead?

> They eventually get a point of having nothing left to lose, and
> or to protect, like you and your goddam mommy.
>

No, fucktard, I brought up the mommy thing first. You look like an even
bigger retard than usual trying to push it back on me.

> Life is ugly and cheap and meaningless,

Kind of like you?

a random rat-fuck
> just waiting to happen. Don't make me come over there
> and prove it to you.
>

Oh, my god! A fruitcake threatening me. I'll be cowering in the basement.

>

>

Wow. Who's the bigger dumbfuck? You or Prey?

[Ben Holmes]

In article <Ywd0s.322$tL7...@newsfe19.iad>, Tom Keske says...

>
>
>
>"Ben Holmes" wrote in message news:k1p45...@drn.newsguy.com...
>
>< What is the JFK assassination to you, and why have you illustrated that
>you know
>< virtually nothing about it?
>
>< Was it a poor education?
>< Were you asleep during History 101?
>
>History in school is propaganda.

That's an excuse for your ignorance of history... not a reason.

>I am coming to the conclusion

Without ... sad to say, explaining your *reason* for your near total ignorance
of *ANY* facts in this case.

>that your real agenda must be to cover-up the truth of the
>JFK assassination, while only pretending to be interested
>in it. I have explained some of why the assassination is
>of personal significance to me.

Without knowing anything other than the extremely broad fact that people killed
a President, you can fit that "fact" to any number of scenarios... to support
any hypothesis you want.

You see, it was really the Brazilians that killed JFK.

Now, moron that you are, you can't martial *ANY* evidence to show how silly such
a proposition is.

>You have not answered that
>direct question,

Then you're too stupid to read.

When did you stop beating your husband?

>concerning yourself, which is highly suspicious
>because you have self-identified as Far-Right and the
>Right has always been hateful of the entire Kennedy name.

You're too stupid to be labeled a liar here... it's that ignorance thing
again... that, and your far left worldview.

>You would have to be practically insane to deny the obvious,
>that the Right in one way another is the lead suspect.

Based on what evidence, moron?

You *STILL* refuse to demonstrate that you know *ANY* of it.

After all, you clearly illustrated that you thought that the official government
position was that JFK was shot from the front - so you clearly don't know
*ANYTHING* about this case.

>The CIA, whom Bobby Kennedy immediately suspected,
>was right-wing. Nixon was right-wing. Bush was right-wing.
>The Cuban exiles were right-wing.

The right wing was right wing too. Don't forget that.

>Suspects, all.


Based on your far left worldview.

It's unfortunate that you know *nothing* of the evidence, isn't it?

>A Devil's Advocate could propagandize that
>LBJ was "liberal", but it would be pure propaganda.

And white is black, and cats are really dogs...

>The whole reason that LBJ was on the ticket in the
>first place, in spite of neither JFK no RFK liking him was for
>"balance" on the right.

More illustration of your historical ignorance.

It's obvious that Mitt Romney picked Paul Ryan to add some liberal balance to
the ticket.

>The GOP Right would have preferred
>their own, like Nixon, but would have been happy to have
>a temporary substitute of next-best, in LBJ. A war-monger.
>Cozy with right-wing Texas oilmen.

Kook, aren't you?

>LBJ did not plan the murder of JFK,
>The murder of JFK was merely planned on *behalf* of LBJ.

Who was secretly a far right wing nutcase, right? Did I get that one?

>Two different things, entirely. Only the CIA could have
>pulled the thing off in the style that it was pulled off.
>Not Mafia. Not Russians. Not Cubans.

What style?

List the evidence that supports your theory.

>Anyone who cannot see that is a na�ve ass or a liar.

Nah... the "na�ve ass or a liar" is the one who makes claims that he cannot
support.

>< And yes, *still* no description of the original wound in JFK's throat.
>Rather
>< cowardly of you, isn't it?
>
>You are as bat-shit crazy as that other Holmes.

Oh? You mean my brother James? Sorry kook, he doesn't post online.

>I think that
>you are really only here to harass anyone who gets
>too close to the truth, of right-wing, GOP partisan politics
>being central to the JFK assassination.

And I think the same as most people who read these posts... that you're a far
left wacko who makes true liberals look bad.

So tell us, why are you so afraid to provide the answer to a simple question of
historical fact in this case?

[Ben Holmes]

In article <Sxd0s.369$Qs3...@newsfe11.iad>, Tom Keske says...

>
>
>
>
>< And yes, *still* no description of the original wound in JFK's throat.
>Rather
>< cowardly of you, isn't it?
>
>You are insane, and not even in an entertaining way.

You don't think it's cowardly to keep running from a rather basic question
regarding the topic of a forum?

This *IS*, you know, a forum on the conspiracy that took JFK's life... this
isn't 'alt.far-left-wing-wacko.fantasyland'

Now why can't you tell everyone here what the original description of the bullet
wound in JFK's throat looked like?

Could it be that you're a moron?

Or a coward?

[Ben Holmes]

In article <oId0s.394$Ok1...@newsfe13.iad>, Tom Keske says...

>
>
>
>.
>
>< I wondered if you had AIDS, and now you've verified it. My joint
>< position with both the FBI and CIA puts me in place to let you know
>< that we have not the slightest interest in you and hope you will fade
>< away soon. We have actually thrown your file away as useless.
>
>Do not have AIDS, thank you.
>
>The CIA doesn't really have choice about interested or not.
>When someone writes a poem about malfunctioning control
>rods at a nuclear reactor, and mentions a specific reactor,
>and that reactor has a control rod malfunction, they
>have no choice but to be "interested". They would be
>negligent and derelict in their duties, and should be summarily
>fired, if they were not.
>
>When things of that order start happening repeatedly, they
>would *know* that there is something more than coincidence.
>
>Ironic that I have nothing to hide. They do. I've committed
>no crimes, but still hip-deep in some kind of intrigue.
>
>Some of these things that I have been saying can be verified
>by web-search. I have already said that I would take a
>polygraph about anything that I ever say, for anyone
>at all who wanted to arrange it.

Wouldn't prove a thing. Paranoid nutcases really *DO* believe their nonsense.

>I can see it coming, the day of reversal, when people
>who would not believe that I had any possible involvement
>at all, will refuse to believe that I did *not* have any actual
>participation in the activities, just being done from shadows
>apparently for the purpose of punctuating the points that
>I was trying to make, which apparently had the whole-hearted
>endorsement of some powerful and shadowy groups or
>individuals.
>
>I wouldn't be the least surprised if you really *did*
>have connection with CIA and only pretending to
>joke about it. They would hurl sarcastic crap and
>ridicule while knowing full well that everything
>that I said was accurate. That is the way that they
>operate. Have observed the games in action,
>for decades.
>
>Some of the shadows have been impressive enough
>that I am willing to take on the bastards in all their
>power and treachery. I could get killed at any time,
>I am very highly aware, and have been repeatedly
>threatened, but they are really in the same boat.
>
>A bit like a Cold-War standoff, eyeball-to-eyeball.
>
>Tom Keske
>

[Ben Holmes]

In article <NPd0s.345$xV....@newsfe14.iad>, Tom Keske says...
>
>
>
>"

>< Ralph McGehee posted to an old Vietnam War group that we had long ago. He
>was a
>< flaming nut job. Nice enough guy but still a flaming nut job.
>
>Bullshit. A typical smear-job of propaganda shit-artists.
>
>His CIAbase was well-respected by even mainstream journalists.
>
>His views were relatively bland and tame, IMHO.
>
>If I were to criticize him for anything, it would be for
>being so incredibly na�ve like a Boy Scout in believing
>initially in the nobility of the great war against communism.
>
>He could not see it as the exercise in rich-man's paranoia
>and ambition for ruthless global dominance, that it
>really was.

American exceptionalism really bothers you, doesn't it?

>I also was not able to interest him in taking up the
>AIDS issue, even though his own CIABase had opened
>my eyes to it. I couldn't get it across to him that I
>had experience harassment has blatantly as he had.
>
>I thought that he was ego-tripping on the Ralph
>McGehee Show, a one-man show.
>
>But I respect him at least for being an intelligent,
>articulate man with a conscience, which is more
>than I can say for any of the BS-artists on this
>newsgroup.
>
>Tom Keske
>

[Ben Holmes]

In article <cUd0s.658$_I7...@newsfe20.iad>, Tom Keske says...

Been waiting for years for kooks to show up at my door.

Never happens.

[Tom Keske]

< Get the email about MIT in 3.5 years, fuckhead?

Jesus, God. People like YOU talk about MY ego?
I don't think that I've ever stooped to gross-out
level bragging like yours.

Means nothing, really. As I mentioned, one of my
decades-long friends had *breezed* his way through
MIT without even having to work very hard.

He was friends with people like 2 of the founders
of RSA Security. Shared a common love interest with
one them, dating the same woman.

Another of my old high school/college friends is at MIT,
working for Nicholas Negroponte. You are trying to
impress the wrong guy with your credentials.
It is hardly a world apart.

I'm now trying to help out the career of a Chinese
gay man from MIT, who I think has a lot of potential.

As I said, though, despite my one friend's
intelligence and education, I still consider him
ridiculously na�ve concerning political reality.

He once opined that it was "proven" that Gulf War
Syndrome wasn't real, for example. His basis is probably
utterly superficial, based on a few propaganda-articles that
he read somewhere in mainstream magazines, like Sarah Palin
at the dentist's office.

One of my other contacts over the years had
been a Nobel-prize nominated (no less) microbiologist
who was a Gulf War Syndrome researcher.

Whom should I believe?

My MIT friend also made a shambles of his
finances through unwise, greedy, overly ambitious
investments. He repeated expressed envy toward
me, in comparison, so sometimes the MIT degree
does not predict the future or validate one's opinions.

Tom Keske

[Tom Keske]

< Been waiting for years for kooks to show up at my door.

< Never happens.

Where would that door happen to be?
You have no fear, right? So you don't mind telling us, right?
Or am I wrong?


Tom Keske

[Ben Holmes]

In article <xQq0s.604$G01...@newsfe15.iad>, Tom Keske says...

>
>
>
>
>< Been waiting for years for kooks to show up at my door.
>
>< Never happens.
>
>Where would that door happen to be?
>You have no fear, right? So you don't mind telling us, right?
>Or am I wrong?
>
>
>Tom Keske

I've pointed out many times over the years just how quickly someone can locate
my phone number & address online.

Even a moron like you should be able to figure it out.

Just beware the cocking sound of my .45 when you come to the door.

[Tom Keske]

< Just beware the cocking sound of my .45 when you come to the door.

You idiot, 1) I don't engage in penny-ante violence, as I already said,
2) you are way too small potatoes, anyway, and
3) when deep-level mysterious intrigue catches up with you,
your little pop-gun would be molten slag in your hand, proving
the impotence in more ways than one of your cocking sound.

Which I would characterize as more of a "clucking" sound,
like a chicken.

Tom Keske

[Ben Holmes]

In article <pEr0s.333$Sj2...@newsfe07.iad>, Tom Keske says...

>
>
>
>< Just beware the cocking sound of my .45 when you come to the door.
>
>You idiot, 1) I don't engage in penny-ante violence, as I already said,
>2) you are way too small potatoes, anyway, and
>3) when deep-level mysterious intrigue catches up with you,
>your little pop-gun would be molten slag in your hand, proving
>the impotence in more ways than one of your cocking sound.
>
>Which I would characterize as more of a "clucking" sound,
>like a chicken.
>
>Tom Keske

Yep... all cowards like to talk a good game, but they'll never back it up.

As I said, never seen a kook at my door yet... and seriously never expect any of
them to show up. Their anonymity is their bravery.

So tell us Tom - do you *EVER* plan to address the question of what the bullet

wound in JFK's throat looked like?

Or keep running away like the coward you are?