Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Mostly developers here?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Charles Calvert  
View profile  
 More options Dec 20 2005, 11:35 pm
Newsgroups: alt.computer.consultants.moderated
From: Charles Calvert <cb...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:35:05 -0500
Local: Tues, Dec 20 2005 11:35 pm
Subject: Re: Mostly developers here?
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:51:31 GMT, "tony" <tonyn...@myisp.net> wrote in
<DlAnf.37026$tV6.4...@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>:

>"technoid" <rconnell5...@wowway.com> wrote in message news:HamdnYR1kcugiwPeRVn-tg@wideopenwest.com...
>> Not in ICCA, but I provide services - mostly SMB networking.  Services that don't look like employee skillsets?  Not sure
>> what you mean.  Most SMB can't afford full-time staff, but if they could, they'd probably hire someone like me - somewhat
>> of a generalist with a focus on networking.

>OK, that's what I do too. I have a feeling most here perform roles on projects
>rather than having responsibility for complete projects (?).

What is this feeling based on?

>I don't provide "auxiliary staffing" for technical projects led by
>the client or other firms.

Where is the line between an expert called in to handle one aspect of
a project (e.g. a database expert who designs a database structure
that is part of a larger project) and "auxiliary staffing"?  Is it in
the level of skill?  The amount of autonomy granted to each person?

>By "services that look like employee skillsets", I meant when "consultants"
>offer their skills to clients rather than well-defined services or solutions based
>upon those skills.

Can you give an example of a well-defined service or solution?  How
about one that might satisfy a client who needs a custom application
written?

>I'm still wondering how many people here are more the "auxiliary staff" types
>rather than the "solution provider" types. It would be a good poll if it could be had.
>At this time, I'm thinking that the ICCA is mostly the former types (?).

Based on what?
--
Charles Calvert
Moderator - alt.computer.consultants.moderated
Submission Address: a...@celticwolf.net
Contact Address: accm_...@celticwolf.net

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.