Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion "stealth emailer"....
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Nick FitzGerald  
View profile  
 More options Apr 5 2001, 8:00 pm
Newsgroups: alt.comp.virus
From: "Nick FitzGerald" <n...@virus-l.demon.co.uk>
Date: 6 Apr 2001 11:59:50 +1200
Local: Thurs, Apr 5 2001 7:59 pm
Subject: Re: "stealth emailer"....

Sugien <geni...@mindless.com> wrote:
> as he stated it , I will stand by it, ...

Good -- so you are agreeing you lost your own bet and will send me all
your computers.  I normally wouldn't want them, but you seem keen to
give them away and I really think the world would be  better place if
you didn't have access to computers or the net for a while...

> ...  all the files are uploaded to the ISP,
> my son *may* have not changed his graphic links from when he was testing it
> local; but that is an oversight and not by design, he just hasn't changed
> them yet, if you go to the url
> http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael
> you will find all the same graphics, he has just not changed them yet.
> better yet do a
> view-source:http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael/index.html  which will
> bring up the index's html in notepad and you will see the web page *is* on
> the ISP, and he just hasn't changed the graphic links yet. And after looking
> it also looks like he still has some of his html pointing at the local
> files; but the local files aren't there because he moved them local after he
> uploaded them; but the web page it's self which a web page is actually the
> index.html ***is** on a ISP which is provable with the above view-source.

..

That's all well-and-good, but it is **completely irrelevant** to what
I claimed.  I did not say the pages weren't on the ISP's servers.  I
didn't even check if they were and I don't care because that was
irrelevant to my point, which was that the pages that were on the ISP
include absolute links to the copies of the pages on Michael's
"development machine".  That was all I claimed and you said I was
wrong and would bet all your computers against my claim.  You even
admitted my claim was correct in the post wehre you posed the bet:

: ... but seriously he knows it won't work as it is...

which was all I was claiming.

You then confirm my claim again in the post I am responding to:

> ... I
> wasn't aware he hadn't changed his links but Nick also said my almost
> stealth emailer was being downloaded from a local machine that was just
> redirected to; but that is wrong also.  ...

No -- I didn't say that.  Apart from being a quite clearly absurd
claim, I cannot see how even your drug-addled monkey-brain can so
grievously misunderstand what I wrote and then repeat it so badly
misrepresented here.  To save others going back to re-read what I
wrote about redirecting:

# > http://www.zoomnet.net/~quick/myprograms/almoststealthemailer.html
#
# Which redirects and d/ls a file from your son's web space at:
#
#    http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/

Now -- where did I say it redirects and/or d/s from a local machine?

And, back to Soooog's most recent message:

> ...  the index which ****IS**** at
> http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael  is this:

> <HTML>
> <TITLE>Mike's Crib</TITLE>
> <frameset cols="12%,*">
>   <frame src="leftside.html"FRAMEBORDER="0">
>   <frame src="rightside.html"FRAMEBORDER="0" name="CONTENT">

> </frameset>
> </HTML>

> so you tell me is the above html which is on a ISP server is it local on one
> of my computers or on the ISP's server?

I never said it was not on the ISP's server.  I said there are links
on it that are broken and indicate that your son, in typically
Sugien-esque "style" hasn't tested the site very well, but he probably
believes that the site works because he only tests from a machine that
does have local copies of the files in the "broken" links.  In fact,
despite this discussion the links in the "leftside.html" frame are
*still* broken.

You've been shown to be seriously wrong again Sooooog and to have
lost your own bet, so send me your computers.

Or are you such a lame-arse ninny that you don't even stand by your
own convictions and offers?  Do we have to add "doesn't pay his
dues" to all the other shortcomings you love exposing to us?

--
Nick FitzGerald


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.