!BugShit's Daddy! Re: To put this to rest

4Q

unread,

Nov 13, 2007, 7:23:50 PM11/13/07

to

Dustin Cook wrote:
> If you've been reading the opinions requested on toolbar thread, You've
> seen HHI mentioned a time or two. Rhonda isn't going to let up on my
> association with the group, so for the record... This is what HHI is...
>
> Ehm, que the credits!
>
> Happy Hacker Industries
>
> Is an Audio/Video ripping group founded several years ago
> by a few individuals who do nothing but deal with computers
> on a yearly 24/7 schedule; and sometimes when sleeping.
>
>
We release things as we find the time to do so, we do not
> release items necessarily as they come out in the stores.
> We take pride in our releases and do monitor various outlets
> where our work can be acquired.
>
>

I thought I'd widen the net for you a bit
Dustbin. Your fanbase wants to know all
about your criminal skanking, whilst
you pretend to be as honest as the day
is long. But in your case a pitch black
arctic winter day :))

4Q

Dustin Cook

unread,

Nov 15, 2007, 11:18:31 PM11/15/07

to

4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1194999830.146735.164810@
19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com:

Hi 4Q.

Lets clear something up for the fanbase, before we get too far in this
thread of yours. I make no effort to pretend to be anything other than an
Ex virus writer. I do not write intentionally destructive code of any
sort and haven't done so in a very long time. The only things which I
have said I no longer do have to do with vxing or "hacking" for malicious
intentions. I have nothing to do with any of those aspects, as I've said.

If you want to complain because I don't have a moral issue with a ripping
group feel free, but don't bother trying to mislead anybody into thinking
I'm pretending to be anyone or anything that I'm not.

--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunte...@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt

4Q

unread,

Nov 18, 2007, 7:24:16 PM11/18/07

to

Let's clear something *more* up for the
fanbase, Dustfuck you untrustworthy
cuntsnot. You've broken your pretend
radio silence in order to reply to this
thread and it's not the first time you
have been caught stepping on your dick
with your killfilter lies.

>pretend to be anything other than an
> Ex virus writer. I do not write intentionally destructive code of any
> sort and haven't done so in a very long time. The only things which I

Bullshit, Mr Nirodh Cook... We both know
that you are malicious deep down and will
always be. Most people will suspect that
you hold back your malicious tendancies
for *special occasions* but I know you
for the real piece of shit you really
are, yer a scheming malicious shitbag.

> have said I no longer do have to do with vxing or "hacking" for malicious
> intentions. I have nothing to do with any of those aspects, as I've said.
>

*HAHAHA* Lying cunt.

> If you want to complain because I don't have a moral issue with a ripping
> group feel free, but don't bother trying to mislead anybody into thinking
> I'm pretending to be anyone or anything that I'm not.
>

Yes a liar would protest his innocence
inspite of the obvious lie he defends.

For me, the absolute confirmation of
your dishonesty was posting Rhonda's
personal details to ALT.SEX and asking
sexual predators to pay her a visit, and
when it got traced to your IP address you
started some ridiculous story about an
Open drive-by Wi-Fi. That is why anyone
dealing with you in the future only has
to look at your past to see what an
utter lying malicious cunt you really are.

Hope that's helped "the fanbase"
4Q

p.s. I'm still waiting for you to
produce the evidence that you can write
code in Assembly, come on you claimed
you was an expert in Assembly surely
we can see some... *waiting* ;]]

Dustin Cook

unread,

Nov 18, 2007, 11:29:19 PM11/18/07

to

4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:15f9d1ae-d652-4c2e...@d50g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:

Nothing pretend about the fact you've been removed from my killfile.
Another reader of alt.comp.virus brought your posts to my attention. I
figured I should read them for myself, so I had to unkillfile you.

I have no intentions of adding you back to the killfile in the near future
tho, as you raise a few valid questions I should answer. Not for your
benefit really, but for anyone stupid enough to buy the bullshit your
trying to sell.

> Bullshit, Mr Nirodh Cook... We both know
> that you are malicious deep down and will
> always be. Most people will suspect that
> you hold back your malicious tendancies
> for *special occasions* but I know you
> for the real piece of shit you really
> are, yer a scheming malicious shitbag.

If you want to debate this, I'd be happy to do so. My activities pretty
much speak for themselves however. You will not find me linked to any
intentionally malicious software that's been released in going on 8 years.
The reason being, I simply don't do those things anymore.

Whether you believe it or not doesn't matter in the grand schem of things.
My actions, or lack thereof tell everyone what's going on.

>> have said I no longer do have to do with vxing or "hacking" for
>> malicious intentions. I have nothing to do with any of those aspects,
>> as I've said.
>>
>
> *HAHAHA* Lying cunt.

As you claim I'm a liar, I now ask you to provide proof of your claim.
I have stated, I'm not associated with anything malicious, hacking or vxing
wise. You have evidence to the contrary, I'd like to see it.

>> If you want to complain because I don't have a moral issue with a
>> ripping group feel free, but don't bother trying to mislead anybody
>> into thinking I'm pretending to be anyone or anything that I'm not.
>>
>
> Yes a liar would protest his innocence
> inspite of the obvious lie he defends.

Which lie would that be, 4Q? Can you be specific please? In what possible
way have I mislead anyone here?

> For me, the absolute confirmation of
> your dishonesty was posting Rhonda's
> personal details to ALT.SEX and asking
> sexual predators to pay her a visit, and
> when it got traced to your IP address you
> started some ridiculous story about an
> Open drive-by Wi-Fi. That is why anyone

For the record, just to keep things factual, I didn't say at any time this
was an open wifi network. What I said was that another member who was using
one of the computers here locally did make use of the provided information.
This network does support WiFi, no doubt. But you will require a key and
the proper network configuration; as none of it is default inside the LAN.

> dealing with you in the future only has
> to look at your past to see what an
> utter lying malicious cunt you really are.

I haven't lied about anything I've said, despite your silly and weak
efforts to claim otherwise.

> Hope that's helped "the fanbase"
> 4Q

I don't think you've done me any harm. You have confirmed I am an ex vxer,
and you have confirmed the existance of HHI, whose activities are not,
despite whatever you might think, hated by all. If you have stock in
media/radio/tv/movies, yea, HHI might sting you. If not, We aren't against
you. For your information, HHI has recently been credited by various
individuals has having released a better rip of SpiderMan 3; better even
than AxxO's release, which if you know anything of the XviD/DiVX scene, is
nothing easy.

> p.s. I'm still waiting for you to
> produce the evidence that you can write
> code in Assembly, come on you claimed
> you was an expert in Assembly surely
> we can see some... *waiting* ;]]

You should do a better job of stalking me then if it's evidence you want. I
have already examined a program known as SharkPost for an individual; and
have been in contact with it's author. I was able to confirm beyond any
reasonable doubt that I (a) do understand assembler and (b) obviously know
programming and low level code much better than you would like to admit.
For your reference, and that of our fanbase; You can find the discussion on
alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d

Besides 4Q, You couldn't determine how BugHunter worked; you said at one
point it must be a string scanner, then a checksummer. The whole time, your
ignorant arse had no idea until I took the time to explain it to you.
Obviously, trying to prove anything to you would be similar to trying to
teach a blind man to see with his eyes anyway.

4Q

unread,

Nov 19, 2007, 4:56:15 AM11/19/07

to

*HAHAHA* Caught with your pants down
again Dustfuck! Was this the same excuse
you used last time you conveniently
unkillfiled to read all my posts *LOL*

*TWANG!* Now do me a dance you KoOk
fucker.

> Another reader of alt.comp.virus brought your posts to my attention. I
> figured I should read them for myself, so I had to unkillfile you.
>
> I have no intentions of adding you back to the killfile in the near future
> tho, as you raise a few valid questions I should answer. Not for your
> benefit really, but for anyone stupid enough to buy the bullshit your
> trying to sell.

*HAHAHA* You used this same excuse last
time, I'll always 0wn your stupid ass!

>
> > Bullshit, Mr Nirodh Cook... We both know
> > that you are malicious deep down and will
> > always be. Most people will suspect that
> > you hold back your malicious tendancies
> > for *special occasions* but I know you
> > for the real piece of shit you really
> > are, yer a scheming malicious shitbag.
>
>
> If you want to debate this, I'd be happy to do so. My activities pretty
> much speak for themselves however. You will not find me linked to any
> intentionally malicious software that's been released in going on 8 years.
> The reason being, I simply don't do those things anymore.
>

Yeah, yeah pull the other one it's got
bells on ;P

> Whether you believe it or not doesn't matter in the grand schem of things.
> My actions, or lack thereof tell everyone what's going on.
>
> >> have said I no longer do have to do with vxing or "hacking" for
> >> malicious intentions. I have nothing to do with any of those aspects,
> >> as I've said.
> >>
> >
> > *HAHAHA* Lying cunt.
>
> As you claim I'm a liar, I now ask you to provide proof of your claim.

Prove your not. (It's at this point
Dustbin usually drags him dying crippled
mother to the computer so she can tell
us all what a nice boy he is, again)
In the meanwhile do me some dancing like
a fucker on a leash.

<snip> Dustbin's foaming and frothing

>
> > For me, the absolute confirmation of
> > your dishonesty was posting Rhonda's
> > personal details to ALT.SEX and asking
> > sexual predators to pay her a visit, and
> > when it got traced to your IP address you
> > started some ridiculous story about an
> > Open drive-by Wi-Fi. That is why anyone
>
> For the record, just to keep things factual, I didn't say at any time this
> was an open wifi network. What I said

*ROFL* You really need to read what you
already typed for the archives you fuckin
spoon. "I run an open wifi network..."

<snip> froth

>
> I haven't lied about anything I've said, despite your silly and weak
> efforts to claim otherwise.
>

*HAHAHA* Go back and check what you
wrote to Michael Broomfield about
killing people and spending time in
prison, blowhard. The archives are full
of your fucking lies.

<snip> Spiderman frothing

>
> > p.s. I'm still waiting for you to
> > produce the evidence that you can write
> > code in Assembly, come on you claimed
> > you was an expert in Assembly surely
> > we can see some... *waiting* ;]]
>
> You should do a better job of stalking me then if it's evidence you want. I
> have already examined a program known as SharkPost for an individual; and
> have been in contact with it's author. I was able to confirm beyond any
> reasonable doubt that I (a) do understand assembler and (b) obviously know
> programming and low level code much better than you would like to admit.
> For your reference, and that of our fanbase; You can find the discussion on
> alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>

Post the link to the Assembly code
you've written, so we can all check it
out. And I don't want to see some
bASIC call to a DOS interrupt, Nirodh.
A full application written in x86 ASM,
not some disassembly of your bASIC crap.

Here's a little reminder for anyone that
wants to checkout your elite bASIC

http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/

Follow code links on left hand side.
A roll of cotton wool to stuff in your
mouth, to stop laughter can be found on
the right hand side ;]]

4Q

Arse Clown

unread,

Nov 19, 2007, 5:12:21 AM11/19/07

to

4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:fe894f24-67ce-473f...@i37g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:

Love will tear us apart....

Robert Johnson

unread,

Nov 19, 2007, 5:18:28 AM11/19/07

to

Arse Clown <adri...@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:Xns99EDD7AECD437ej...@211.29.133.50:

> 4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fe894f24-67ce-473f...@i37g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Nirodh Cook wrote:
>>> 4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in

>>> news:15f9d1ae-d652-4c2e-8b81-d74387ed35f7

Craig.

Anonymous

unread,

Nov 19, 2007, 5:41:14 AM11/19/07

to

"Arse Clown" <adri...@ozemail.com.au> wrote...

>
> Love will tear us apart....

My big black abo cock will tear your shithole apart!

BWAAAHAAAHAAHAHAHHAHHAHHAAAAHHH!!!!!!!

George Orwell

unread,

Nov 19, 2007, 5:41:10 AM11/19/07

to

BWAAAHAAAHAAHAHAHHAHHAHHAAAAHHH!!!!!!!

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

Dustin Cook

unread,

Nov 19, 2007, 11:25:05 PM11/19/07

to

4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:fe894f24-67ce-473f...@i37g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:

>> Nothing pretend about the fact you've been removed from my killfile.
>
> *HAHAHA* Caught with your pants down
> again Dustfuck! Was this the same excuse
> you used last time you conveniently
> unkillfiled to read all my posts *LOL*

*yawn*. 4Q, I know, simple things are hard for you to understand, but the
fact of the matter is simple. I removed you from a killfilter that was
previously set to disregard any messages from your stupid ass.

So no, shit for brains, you haven't caught me with my pants down or even
my shirt off.

> *TWANG!* Now do me a dance you KoOk
> fucker.

Is this your lame attempt to evade the points I brought up? :)

>> Another reader of alt.comp.virus brought your posts to my attention.
>> I figured I should read them for myself, so I had to unkillfile you.
>>
>> I have no intentions of adding you back to the killfile in the near
>> future tho, as you raise a few valid questions I should answer. Not
>> for your benefit really, but for anyone stupid enough to buy the
>> bullshit your trying to sell.
>
> *HAHAHA* You used this same excuse last
> time, I'll always 0wn your stupid ass!

4Q, You don't even 0wn your own ass, let alone anyone elses. You've
always been a snot nosed little panzi ass who's been kicked off of every
previous hosting provider you had. You basically just talk shit and hide
like a little bitchass coward that we have all figured out you are by
now.

Everytime you've tried to come at me with a cheap shot (and really, it's
all you have in your arsenal because as I said previously, your a
cowardly little panzi) I've defended myself and left you crying foul with
your tail between your legs. Your stupid ass couldn't even figure out how
BugHunter worked until I finally got irritated enough to just tell you.
How long after learning it wasn't a string scanner at all did you leave
that bit of misinformation on your site? How is anyone supposed to take
you or anything you say seriously when you can't tell the difference
between a checksummer and a string scanner. EVEN when it's pointed out to
your stupid ass!

And I'm still waiting for you to prove that BugHunter is malicious or
that it contains malicious code; It's going on 3 years old. Mr panzi, can
you find the code or not?

>> > Bullshit, Mr Nirodh Cook... We both know
>> > that you are malicious deep down and will
>> > always be. Most people will suspect that
>> > you hold back your malicious tendancies
>> > for *special occasions* but I know you
>> > for the real piece of shit you really
>> > are, yer a scheming malicious shitbag.
>>
>>
>> If you want to debate this, I'd be happy to do so. My activities
>> pretty much speak for themselves however. You will not find me linked
>> to any intentionally malicious software that's been released in going
>> on 8 years. The reason being, I simply don't do those things anymore.
>>
>
> Yeah, yeah pull the other one it's got
> bells on ;P

So you have evidence to the contrary, or is this another one of your
panzi trolling maneuvers?

>
>> Whether you believe it or not doesn't matter in the grand schem of
>> things. My actions, or lack thereof tell everyone what's going on.
>>
>> >> have said I no longer do have to do with vxing or "hacking" for
>> >> malicious intentions. I have nothing to do with any of those
>> >> aspects, as I've said.
>> >>
>> >
>> > *HAHAHA* Lying cunt.
>>
>> As you claim I'm a liar, I now ask you to provide proof of your
>> claim.
>
> Prove your not. (It's at this point

Nice try, but it doesn't work that way, stupid. You claimed something,
it's on you to back it up, not me. :)

> In the meanwhile do me some dancing like
> a fucker on a leash.

If you mean by Dance trash everything you've written with ease, I'm
dancing pretty damn good today. :)

>> For the record, just to keep things factual, I didn't say at any time
>> this was an open wifi network. What I said
>
> *ROFL* You really need to read what you
> already typed for the archives you fuckin
> spoon. "I run an open wifi network..."

Hahaha. I know, it's a hard thing for you to figure out. I do indeed run
an open wifi network, it provides internet access to some neighbors who
otherwise wouldn't have it. However, it's not the only network I run, and
this network (not the open wifi) didn't send the message. The other one
did.

>> I haven't lied about anything I've said, despite your silly and weak
>> efforts to claim otherwise.
>>
>
> *HAHAHA* Go back and check what you
> wrote to Michael Broomfield about
> killing people and spending time in
> prison, blowhard. The archives are full
> of your fucking lies.

Pay very close attention, okay? I'm only going to repeat myself for the
2nd time here. Due to my previous activities which were not legal in all
countries, it was in my best interest to ensure misinformation was
offered; Enough so that I fooled you, Kurt Wisemer and who knows how many
others who think they're profilers.

The archives are full of stories mixed with factual information on me.
They have served the intended purpose well; Even you don't know what's
what.

> <snip> Spiderman frothing

Yea, I didn't think you'd have much to say. You'd be laughed at :)

>> You should do a better job of stalking me then if it's evidence you
>> want. I have already examined a program known as SharkPost for an
>> individual; and have been in contact with it's author. I was able to
>> confirm beyond any reasonable doubt that I (a) do understand
>> assembler and (b) obviously know programming and low level code much
>> better than you would like to admit. For your reference, and that of
>> our fanbase; You can find the discussion on
>> alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>
> Post the link to the Assembly code
> you've written,

No can do. Much of it was malicious in nature and I'm not about to host
anything intentionally harmful to prove something I have already done in
another thread. If you can't be bothered to check it for yourself, not my
problem. I provided the information for the audience's benefit anyway,
not yours. We both know your not interested in any facts.

> A full application written in x86 ASM,

You couldn't tell the difference between a string scanner and a
checksumming program. You aren't worthy of seeing any of my source code.
No matter how much you beg, and whine, you will never force me to show
you any code of any sort in any language. I'm just not going to do that
pissing contest.

> not some disassembly of your bASIC crap.

Wouldn't matter, your stupid ass wouldn't even understand it. :)

> Here's a little reminder for anyone that
> wants to checkout your elite bASIC
>
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/

Oh, Go 4Q find some really old sample work of things done years and years
ago. That's the best you can do against me eh? :) Panzi. My code now
looks nothing like the outdated shit your passing off as recent.

4Q

unread,

Nov 20, 2007, 2:50:43 AM11/20/07

to

Nirodh Cook wrote:
> 4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in
> news:fe894f24-67ce-473f...@i37g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> Nothing pretend about the fact you've been removed from my killfile.
> >
> > *HAHAHA* Caught with your pants down
> > again Dustfuck! Was this the same excuse
> > you used last time you conveniently
> > unkillfiled to read all my posts *LOL*
>
> *yawn*. 4Q, I know, simple things are hard for you to understand, but the
> fact of the matter is simple. I removed you from a killfilter

*snicker* you stupid super-sized used
condom! You keep getting caught, anytime
I rattle your cage you magically jump
out from behind your pretend killfile

<quote> 26th March 2007
"Your already killfiled"
</quote>

Few days later caught replying to my
posts that you CAN'T see! *ROFL*

<quote> 13th November 2007
"I don't see his posts..."
</quote>

Few days later caught replying to my
posts that you CANNOT see!

There's a pattern developing here
you fucking Nirodh! Sorry your own
words make you look stupid :-)

<snip>

Black Box
=========

> Your stupid ass couldn't even figure out how

> BugShit worked until I finally got irritated enough to just tell you.

That's a distorted mistruth (oh yeah
your suppost to be a master of
misinformation *snigger snigger*).

So here are the facts so you can't
keep trotting out this worm-wriggle
of yours.

* Your crapware is compressed by an
external packer program, a popular
technique used by Malware authors to
evade anti-malware scanners.

* Your coding skills are utter shite
and we've seen the evidence for this.
The chances of your most recent crapware
being more of the same shite are
extremely high and therefore it would
be a waste of anyones time to look at
your shite.

* I did consider getting an unpacker from
"EXETOOLS" but then realised I would be
wading through your utter shite with
the IDA Pro disassembler just to confirm
that your have wrote utter SHITE again
(history is on our side)

* I waited for you to jump up and down
like a pencil-necked pip-squeak demanding
your SHITE got some attention. Instead
I decided to use a physics priciple
and occupy the lowest quantum state of
energy, i.e. do nothing
And occasionally use my masterly powers
of trolling to make you dance around
Usenet like a fucking tard stomping up
and down on your dick doing an amusing
worm-wriggling dance <quote> Dustbin
"I finally got irritated" </quote>
<-- I'm quite happy with my results,
although I must admit *TWANGING* your
strings and making you dance does go
against the laws of energy conservation!
But I must entertain my fans *grin*

* When you finally succumb to my trolls
back in August 2007, you spewed out some
Toothpaste like marketing SHITE about how
your crap allegedly worked. I trolled
you some more about your proprietary
CRC checksum but you couldn't answer
any of the questions put to you... So
out of the kindness of my heart I gave
you some pointers to Bruce Schneiers
discussions on why homemade amateur
SHITE algorithms are dismissed by the
professional security industry, and I
suggested to subscribe to "sci.crypt"
newsgroup and start talking your SHITE
about algorithms there *big smile*

* When I studied Computer Science at
University we did a subject called
"Software Engineering", and part of the
analysis techniques for unknown codes
is the "Black box" methodology. I've
applied a variant known as the
"Black Box Trolling" methodology, where
I get some stupid cunt to jump up and
down dancing about "irritated" ranting about his SHITE. Meanwhile I
sit back
and watch my 'trollee' entertain us like
a good little monkey. ;]]

<snip>

> How long after learning it wasn't a string scanner at all did you leave
> that bit of misinformation on your site? How is anyone supposed to take
> you or anything you say seriously when you can't tell the difference
> between a checksummer and a string scanner. EVEN when it's pointed out to
> your stupid ass!
>

More or your misinformation & untruths
there Dustbin. I've studied and coded
checksummers and scanners, many years
before you came on the scene shouting
your crap in hacking groups. I even
published the Assembly code on the 4Q
site just to give you a chance to see
how proper hax0r code is written, using
generic industry proven algorithms.
Btw you still haven't completed the
challenge to analyse the comms program
kindly uploaded for you. :))

> And I'm still waiting for you to prove that BugHunter is malicious or
> that it contains malicious code; It's going on 3 years old. Mr panzi, can
> you find the code or not?
>

See above lengthy explanation about
"Black Box Trolling" and then consider
what *we* (people exposed to you) know
about your malicious history and how
history always repeats itself. Once a
turd always a turd.

> >> > Bullshit, Mr Nirodh Cook... We both know
> >> > that you are malicious deep down and will
> >> > always be. Most people will suspect that
> >> > you hold back your malicious tendancies
> >> > for *special occasions* but I know you
> >> > for the real piece of shit you really
> >> > are, yer a scheming malicious shitbag.
> >>
> >>
> >> If you want to debate this, I'd be happy to do so. My activities
> >> pretty much speak for themselves however. You will not find me linked
> >> to any intentionally malicious software that's been released in going
> >> on 8 years. The reason being, I simply don't do those things anymore.
> >>

Liar.

> >
> > Yeah, yeah pull the other one it's got
> > bells on ;P
>
> So you have evidence to the contrary, or is this another one of your
> panzi trolling maneuvers?
>

History and your propensity to continue
being a malcious miscreant. It's all
in the Google archives :))

> >
> >> Whether you believe it or not doesn't matter in the grand schem of
> >> things. My actions, or lack thereof tell everyone what's going on.
> >>
> >> >> have said I no longer do have to do with vxing or "hacking" for
> >> >> malicious intentions. I have nothing to do with any of those
> >> >> aspects, as I've said.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > *HAHAHA* Lying cunt.
> >>
> >> As you claim I'm a liar, I now ask you to provide proof of your
> >> claim.
> >
> > Prove your not. (It's at this point
>
> Nice try, but it doesn't work that way, stupid. You claimed something,
> it's on you to back it up, not me. :)
>

Balance of probabilites say you are,
based on your long history of lying
and your malicious actions past and
present.

> > In the meanwhile do me some dancing like
> > a fucker on a leash.
>
> If you mean by Dance trash everything you've written with ease, I'm
> dancing pretty damn good today. :)
>

Continue to dance Dustfuck, everyone
with half a clue can see you jigging
about like a full sized Nirodh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTLj_3R0-2g

http://fourq.host.sk/img/Nirodh_Cook.jpg <-- "I don't mind being full
sized used condom"

> >> For the record, just to keep things factual, I didn't say at any time
> >> this was an open wifi network. What I said
> >
> > *ROFL* You really need to read what you
> > already typed for the archives you fuckin
> > spoon. "I run an open wifi network..."
>
> Hahaha. I know, it's a hard thing for you to figure out. I do indeed run
> an open wifi network, it provides

*Oops* you've stepped on your dick,
I one sentence you say don't run an
open wifi, then you do run an open wifi

Can you see why people have a problem
keeping up with your lies and constant
switcherooing.

<snip> more backpeddling

> > *HAHAHA* Go back and check what you
> > wrote to Michael Broomfield about
> > killing people and spending time in
> > prison, blowhard. The archives are full
> > of your fucking lies.
>
> Pay very close attention, okay? I'm only going to repeat myself for the
> 2nd time here. Due to my previous activities which were not legal in all
> countries, it was in my best interest to ensure misinformation was
> offered; Enough so that I fooled you, Kurt Wisemer and who knows how many
> others who think they're profilers.

*hehe* Dustfuck you have a big problem
don't you. No one can take your word
because you're always running your
scheming misinformation. Anyone with
half a clue and keeping up with the
archives can see how fucking stupid you
look.

>
> The archives are full of stories mixed with factual information on me.
> They have served the intended purpose well; Even you don't know what's
> what.
>

Yes they are "full" as you say, and any
reasonable minded person would conclude
that you cannot be trusted Then, Now or
Ever. **Hey Rhonda remember, painted
himself into a corner?**

> > <snip> Spiderman frothing
>
> Yea, I didn't think you'd have much to say. You'd be laughed at :)
>

What, that you braggartly admit you've
been distributing the property of other
people??? All you've done is confirmed
that you are a skanking cunt, and people
with any sense shouldn't touch you with
the proverbial barge pole.

Again you are hoisted by your own peTARD

here's your usual SHITE

http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/600600e471413116.txt

Now here's a newer and improved SHITE
(5yrs on)

http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/63c9698c693bb4e0.txt

Any you expect people to believe some
fairy story that you've somehow magically
produced an IMPROVED version of what
Kadaicha Man described as your
"Burnished Bronze Polished Code Turd"

*HAHAHAHHAHAHA* *ROFL*

4Q

Dustin Cook

unread,

Nov 20, 2007, 10:16:46 PM11/20/07

to

4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:8afefead-738e-440f...@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:

> Nirodh Cook wrote:
>> 4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in
>> news:fe894f24-67ce-473f...@i37g2000hsd.googlegroups.com
>> :
>>
>> >> Nothing pretend about the fact you've been removed from my
>> >> killfile.
>> >
>> > *HAHAHA* Caught with your pants down
>> > again Dustfuck! Was this the same excuse
>> > you used last time you conveniently
>> > unkillfiled to read all my posts *LOL*
>>
>> *yawn*. 4Q, I know, simple things are hard for you to understand, but
>> the fact of the matter is simple. I removed you from a killfilter
>
> *snicker* you stupid super-sized used
> condom! You keep getting caught, anytime
> I rattle your cage you magically jump
> out from behind your pretend killfile

4Q, please; your hardly rattling anybodies cage here.
I mean really, people get removed/added to killfiles everyday. Why would
I pretend about something as silly as that anyhow? Don't be completely
stupid. :)

> There's a pattern developing here
> you fucking Nirodh! Sorry your own
> words make you look stupid :-)

Theres been a pattern developing for sometime, 4Q. The level of
desperation is becoming obvious with each post. I'm just waiting for you
to explode or for the other asshats to read the google archives about
you. :) Ah well, maybe they care about the whole thing as I do; not
enough to be bothered looking.

Just keep in mind, mr booted from every host he ever had except this last
one, You have a known history too. :) You are not the innocent little
commentator you've been trying to pass yourself off as. You fool ignorant
people and those with a pre-existing agenda, but no-one else. :)

>
>> Your stupid ass couldn't even figure out how

>> BugHunter worked until I finally got irritated enough to just tell

>>you.
>
> That's a distorted mistruth (oh yeah
> your suppost to be a master of
> misinformation *snigger snigger*).

(if your going to quote what I wrote, leave it as written, or don't try
passing off your bullshit as mine).

Is it now. Here's the facts then:

On your front page for me that previously existed (I can rarely get much
from your website these days. Having that many bandwidth issues? - Just
checked it again, get hardly any html data...sigh) so if these are way
out of date, you just let me know. Alright.

Anyways, You called it a string scanner, and did so for.. months..
I told you then it wasn't a string scanner. You continued claiming it
was. (google archives confirm the back and forth we already did). You
claimed initially it could do all sorts of nasty things, or might do so;
you weren't sure. (google archives, again) later you retracted those
statements and instead of admitting you were wrong, you claimed it might
do those things in the future and thats what you meant. (google archives)
I wonder if anybody bought that bullshit excuse of yours?

After I explained to you that it was a checksummer of my own design, you
still didn't update your page and continued to argue on the string
scanner sillyness (google archives).

> So here are the facts so you can't
> keep trotting out this worm-wriggle
> of yours.
>
> * Your crapware is compressed by an
> external packer program, a popular
> technique used by Malware authors to
> evade anti-malware scanners.

BugHunter is compressed by the same external packer program used by the
authors of uTorrent; another popular application. It's called UPX if you
didn't already know. UPX is well known to ALL antivirus applications and
has been for years, it is NOT suitable to evade anti-malware scanners or
anything else. What moron told you UPX was good for hiding from
antimalware scanners? Laugh Laugh.

The idea that BugHunter is crapware is hillarious; people much more
knowledgable than your ignorant arse would tend to disagree with you.
Programs don't get placed on the ultimatebootcd iso if they are shite,
and you fucking know this, you misleading cockroach. :)

> * Your coding skills are utter shite
> and we've seen the evidence for this.

You have 3 non functional posts from me, that are very old. Hardly what
I'd call evidence of my present coding skill, not exactly evidence of
coding skill then either. Speaking of evidence however, you did see
someone take perfectly usable, legal, asic source code and fuck it all
up; "correcting" it. Thanks for reminding us.

> The chances of your most recent crapware
> being more of the same shite are
> extremely high and therefore it would
> be a waste of anyones time to look at
> your shite.

http://www.completelyfreesoftware.com/link_du_w31_BUGHUN.html

http://theitsecurityguy.blogspot.com/2007/06/bughunter-v22c-just-
released.html

Lucky for me, people with knowledge, did check it out, and disagree with
your findings. Not that i expected any different. :)
Do you like this comment the best? "BugHunter is an excellent tool and
one that all Internet users with PCs should run regularly."

Or this one better?

"BugHunter is a "must have" for all PC users."

I like them both. :)

> * I did consider getting an unpacker from
> "EXETOOLS" but then realised I would be
> wading through your utter shite with
> the IDA Pro disassembler just to confirm
> that your have wrote utter SHITE again
> (history is on our side)

History is on whoever's side is telling there version, you mean.
some silly facts (a), you couldn't identify the packer used (b) You
require a 3rd party app to unpack it (c) UPX will gladly unpack itself.
<g>

BugHunter isn't utter shite, it's reasonably well written and highly
optimized at this point. It's been thru many revisions in the past few
years. You might have had a point with v1.x series, but you don't now. :)

> * I waited for you to jump up and down
> like a pencil-necked pip-squeak demanding
> your SHITE got some attention. Instead

BugHunter got more than enough attention when I first mentioned it's
existance here and invited people to try it out; I suspect the fact I
said it was authored by.. Raid of all people, lol, had more to do with
that than the announcement itself tho. :) Ever since I took the advice of
Rhonda and submitted it to a few review sites, it's basically taken off.
I'm very proud of it's userbase size and the users help in tweaking/fine
tuning it these past couple of years.

> I decided to use a physics priciple
> and occupy the lowest quantum state of
> energy, i.e. do nothing

4Q, that's what you typically do when called on point. :)

> And occasionally use my masterly powers
> of trolling to make you dance around
> Usenet like a fucking tard stomping up
> and down on your dick doing an amusing
> worm-wriggling dance <quote> Dustbin
> "I finally got irritated" </quote>

The only powers you do have, right? :)

> <-- I'm quite happy with my results,

LoL. Do you really enjoy being shown as a horse's ass this often? :)

> although I must admit *TWANGING* your
> strings and making you dance does go
> against the laws of energy conservation!
> But I must entertain my fans *grin*

Well, that's a nice way to try and spin the truth, but I don't think
it'll work too well.

> your crap allegedly worked. I trolled
> you some more about your proprietary
> CRC checksum but you couldn't answer

4Q, you didn't troll me for inside information; lol, It's not a corporate
secret or anything, the fact is, you didn't know how the damn thing
worked, and the more you tried to attack it and the more I corrected your
assumptions, the dumber you started to look. :)

> any of the questions put to you... So
> out of the kindness of my heart I gave

Correction mr history teacher, I wouldn't provide you with source code
and I would only provide a very *general* explanation of the algorithm.
If you want more details, you will have to reverse engineer it. Go
download a packer, wannabe. <g>

> * When I studied Computer Science at
> University we did a subject called
> "Software Engineering", and part of the

So what did you do then? Flunk out or drop out?

> and watch my 'trollee' entertain us like
> a good little monkey. ;]]

If by entertain you mean easily disprove damn near everything you write,
I'm happy to do so. :) It gives me untold pleasure running you thru the
coals.

>
> <snip>
>
>
>> How long after learning it wasn't a string scanner at all did you
>> leave that bit of misinformation on your site? How is anyone supposed
>> to take you or anything you say seriously when you can't tell the
>> difference between a checksummer and a string scanner. EVEN when it's
>> pointed out to your stupid ass!
>>
>
> More or your misinformation & untruths
> there Dustbin. I've studied and coded
> checksummers and scanners, many years
> before you came on the scene shouting
> your crap in hacking groups. I even

You are a bullshit artist, 4Q. Indeed, you are. No misinformation there
in the entire paragraph I wrote to speak of (see google archives to
verify). :) If you have studied either subject as you claim, then you
didn't study too damn hard. Do you realize how many people laughed at you
everytime they saw the "string scanner" comment on your site? You looked
like a complete fucking fool! :)

> published the Assembly code on the 4Q
> site just to give you a chance to see
> how proper hax0r code is written, using
> generic industry proven algorithms.

4Q, when I do try to load your site, it doesn't complete loading. I
haven't seen any assembly source code or really, anything beyond your
assinine 4Q examines blah header gif file..

> Btw you still haven't completed the
> challenge to analyse the comms program
> kindly uploaded for you. :))

Never saw any comms program, challenge or what have you. High unlikely to
comment to any challenge you present anyway. You bullshit too much.

>> And I'm still waiting for you to prove that BugHunter is malicious or
>> that it contains malicious code; It's going on 3 years old. Mr panzi,
>> can you find the code or not?
>>
>
> See above lengthy explanation about
> "Black Box Trolling" and then consider
> what *we* (people exposed to you) know
> about your malicious history and how
> history always repeats itself. Once a
> turd always a turd.

Nice spin. :) So the answer to my question then is, no. See, that wasn't
so hard. You may apologize now.

>> >> > Bullshit, Mr Nirodh Cook... We both know
>> >> > that you are malicious deep down and will
>> >> > always be. Most people will suspect that
>> >> > you hold back your malicious tendancies
>> >> > for *special occasions* but I know you
>> >> > for the real piece of shit you really
>> >> > are, yer a scheming malicious shitbag.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you want to debate this, I'd be happy to do so. My activities
>> >> pretty much speak for themselves however. You will not find me
>> >> linked to any intentionally malicious software that's been
>> >> released in going on 8 years. The reason being, I simply don't do
>> >> those things anymore.
>> >>
>
> Liar.

Hahahaha. Claiming someone is something doesn't make it so. As you say,
History speaks for itself. Oh, but doesn't it tho... :)

>
>> >
>> > Yeah, yeah pull the other one it's got
>> > bells on ;P
>>
>> So you have evidence to the contrary, or is this another one of your
>> panzi trolling maneuvers?
>>
>
> History and your propensity to continue
> being a malcious miscreant. It's all
> in the Google archives :))

Indeed, and for the past.. oh, nearly 8 years or so now, nothing
destructive released by Raid/Dustin Cook. Nothing, nada, zilch; I like
those archives too. *grin*. The answer then to my question again, is no.
You may apologize again.

> Balance of probabilites say you are,
> based on your long history of lying
> and your malicious actions past and
> present.

See above.

>> If you mean by Dance trash everything you've written with ease, I'm
>> dancing pretty damn good today. :)
>>
>
> Continue to dance Dustfuck, everyone
> with half a clue can see you jigging
> about like a full sized Nirodh.

Nice Spin. I repeat what I said previously:

"If you mean by Dance trash everything you've written with ease, I'm
dancing pretty damn good today. :)"

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTLj_3R0-2g

I am happy to know that I take up enough of your time so that you
dedicate your energy to worshipping me. a youtube site of all things, I
couldn't ask for a nicer place for you to bow and worship me as your God.
I have always said, I 0wn you, and I meant it. :)

> *Oops* you've stepped on your dick,
> I one sentence you say don't run an
> open wifi, then you do run an open wifi

Quoting out of context will convey any misinformed thought you have in
mind. It's an old and often used trick of trolling, 4Q. Nice try, tho.

> Can you see why people have a problem
> keeping up with your lies and constant
> switcherooing.

4Q, bow to me as your lord and master. You have been lieing too much
recently and you make me angry. :)

>> Pay very close attention, okay? I'm only going to repeat myself for
>> the 2nd time here. Due to my previous activities which were not legal
>> in all countries, it was in my best interest to ensure misinformation
>> was offered; Enough so that I fooled you, Kurt Wisemer and who knows
>> how many others who think they're profilers.
>
> *hehe* Dustfuck you have a big problem
> don't you. No one can take your word

No, statute of limitations is up on most of those previous misdeeds now.
I had a potentially big problem when I was active, as my work was getting
around and causing some mischief. You have the problem, 4Q; you don't
know what's real and what isn't and it's really pissing you off. :)

Your supposed to be this big bad anonymous profiling prick, and yet, you
can't figure me out. HAha Hehe. I 0wn you.

> because you're always running your
> scheming misinformation. Anyone with
> half a clue and keeping up with the
> archives can see how fucking stupid you
> look.

I haven't schemed in a very long time. Social engineering would be
blackhat work, and I already told you; I'm not involved in such
activities anymore. I gave you a chance to prove otherwise, since you
obviously won't be able to do so, you should apologize for lieing about
me. You may apologize now, for the third time if you'd like.

>> The archives are full of stories mixed with factual information on
>> me. They have served the intended purpose well; Even you don't know
>> what's what.
>>
>
> Yes they are "full" as you say, and any
> reasonable minded person would conclude
> that you cannot be trusted Then, Now or
> Ever. **Hey Rhonda remember, painted
> himself into a corner?**

Really? Let's see. It's not reasonable for me to intentionally misinform
people when I was an active blackhat/vxer? I would disagree, and I
suspect people of a reasonable thinking nature would as well. In fact,
that would be highly unreasonable of me to want to provide anything about
me if I'm upto no good. When I was active vx, I was hardly concerned with
whether or not somebody I don't even know trusts me. I have never lost
the trust I had with my associates, even tho I don't participate, I'm
still in the loop with some things. That 4Q, is real trust.

Being able to enter/leave as I please various businesses/personal friends
homes/vehicles even when they are not home is also, real trust. Having
keys to a truck that isn't even yours is trust, 4Q. Some stranger on the
internet's opinion of me, doesn't matter at the end of the day. Sorry,
but it's just not that important to me.

I have the trust of my friends, people I know and people I care about. If
you or laura or heh, Rhonda doesn't trust me, that's completely okay;
because I don't trust any of you either. And we shouldn't. We don't
actually know one another.

Anybody who actually understands real trust, from dealings with various..
grey area people knows exactly what I'm talking about. Get over yourself,
get a girl, do something with your life 4Q. You need to just grow up. I
quit doing malicious things nearly 8 years ago, and I'm not going back to
those activities. Your not doing any real harm to me here, dude. I'm not
writing BugHunter for money. *grin*.

>> > <snip> Spiderman frothing
>>
>> Yea, I didn't think you'd have much to say. You'd be laughed at :)
>>
>
> What, that you braggartly admit you've
> been distributing the property of other
> people??? All you've done is confirmed
> that you are a skanking cunt, and people
> with any sense shouldn't touch you with
> the proverbial barge pole.

I certainly do admit that our (HHI) rip was better than Axxo's, and I
have various non HHI member opinions to prove it. I'm pleased with the
comments actually. It's not everyday your told that your doing as well as
a much more popular group is. AxxO is a fine ripping group, so it's an
honor for us to even be mentioned alongside them. You and I disagree on
what one thinks is property, and that's fine. This isn't really the forum
for an intellectual property debate anyway.

People with any sense will download the movie/audio cd when it's
available to see if it's worth buying/seeing in the theaters. It's the
future, whether you like it or approve of it or not. And i'm not thought
of as a villan for it by as many people as you think. You sir are in the
minority, and your numbers aren't gaining. Either get with the program,
or die a slow/painful death like the RIAA. Your choice.

The days of writing something once and getting paid for the rest of your
life for that one thing are coming to an end. Like everyone else, you
want money, you keep making things. And it's about fucking time.

> Again you are hoisted by your own peTARD
>
> here's your usual SHITE
>
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/600600e471413116.txt

Pay close attention to the date. :)

> Now here's a newer and improved SHITE
> (5yrs on)
>
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/63c9698c693bb4e0.txt

HAHAHAHAHAHA. 4Q, shhh, don't tell anyone, this will be our little
secret; the cluley game you have was written during the weed family;
around the same time. So, no it's not 5 years on, lol.

I said I wasn't going to show any source code, but this is just plain
silly of you. If you want to show off some of my shitty code, lemme help
you with some useful shitty code. :)

temp$=command$
cr$=chr$(13)
lf$=chr$(10)
crlf$=cr$+lf$
print"AZ - File [Encoding/Decoding] Conversion Utility - V1.1"
print"Copyright 1996 by Dustin Cook. All Rights Reserved!"
print" "
gosub optionparser:
if r=0 then
y=1
endif
method$=arg1$
temp$=arg2$
gosub optionparser:
if r=0 then
y=1
endif
infile$=arg1$
outfile$=arg2$
if y=1 then
print"Syntax: AZ (E or D) (Input File) (Output File)"
end
endif
infile$=ltrim$(infile$)
infile$=rtrim$(infile$)
outfile$=ltrim$(outfile$)
outfile$=rtrim$(outfile$)
method$=ltrim$(method$)
method$=rtrim$(method$)
open"i",1,infile$
if error>0 then
print"Unable to read ";
print infile$
end
endif
open"o",2,outfile$
if error>0 then
print"Unable to open ";
print outfile$
end
endif
method$=ucase$(method$)
if method$="E" then
process=1
else
process=2
endif
if process=1 then
print"Encoding...";
else
print"Decoding...";
endif
readmore:
if process=1 then
input #1,a$ BYTE
if error>0 then ending:
goto encode:
endif
if process=2 then
input #1,a$ BYTE
if error>0 then ending:
Input #1,b$ BYTE
a$=a$+b$
goto decode:
endif
end
encode:
number=asc(a$)
a1=65
a2=65
for x=0 to number
if x=number then
a$=chr$(a1)
b$=chr$(a2)
result$=b$+a$
a$=result$
printr=1
gosub printout:
goto readmore:
endif
a1=a1+1
if a1>90 then
a1=65
a2=a2+1
endif
next x
goto readmore:
printout:
z=z+1
if printr=2 then
if a$="" then
print#2,a$
else
print#2,a$ NONULL
endif
endif
if printr<>2 then
if z>30 then
print#2,crlf$ NONULL
z=1
endif
print#2,a$ NONULL
endif
return
decode:
a$=ltrim$(a$)
a$=rtrim$(a$)
result$=a$
a1=65
a2=65
for x=0 to 255
a$=chr$(a1)
b$=chr$(a2)
result2$=b$+a$
if result$=result2$ then
a$=chr$(x)
printr=2
gosub printout:
goto readmore:
endif
a1=a1+1
if a1>90 then
a1=65
a2=a2+1
endif
next x
goto readmore:
ending:
close 1
close 2
print"Done!"
end
optionparser:
TEMP$=LTRIM$(TEMP$)
ERGH = LEN(TEMP$)
r = INSTR(TEMP$, " ")
arg1$ = LEFT$(TEMP$, r)
arg2$ = MID$(TEMP$, r, ERGH)
return

> Any you expect people to believe some
> fairy story that you've somehow magically
> produced an IMPROVED version of what
> Kadaicha Man described as your
> "Burnished Bronze Polished Code Turd"

Well, now that you bring it up; The code you saved for me there is the
code which works as posted, and with kman's changes will no longer even
compile. so how exactly would kman's version be improved?

Here's some newer code, for comparison.. It's the duke nukem saved game
editor.

call sub "ibcritinit"
d1$=chr$(10)
passed=0
main1:
color 15,0
print"DnHaCK v1.0б (saved game editor) - Coded By: RustBug"
print"Works with Duke Nukem (v2.0) episodes 1 2 and 3"
print"program written and compiled on 10/11/97 2:17am"
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
if passed=1 then
print" Working on [";
print begi$;
print"]"
else
color 7,0
print" "
print"Which Episode (1-3): ";
legal1=48
legal2=52
call sub "securekey" legal1,legal2,a$
print a$
endi$=".dn"
endi$=endi$+a$
print"Which Saved Game (1-9): ";
legal1=48
legal2=58
call sub "securekey" legal1,legal2,a$
print a$
begi$="saved"
begi$=begi$+a$
begi$=begi$+endi$
print"ю Loading [";
begi$=ucase$(begi$)
print begi$;
print"]...";
open"r",1,begi$
if error>0 then
print"Can't find/open!"
end
endif
a=filepos(1,8)
input #1,world$ BYTE
a=filepos(1,16)
input #1,health$ BYTE
a=filepos(1,12)
input #1,boots$ BYTE
a=filepos(1,14)
input #1,claw$ BYTE
a=filepos(1,18)
input #1,hand$ BYTE
a=filepos(1,10)
input #1,gun$ BYTE
a=filepos(1,44)
input #1,score$ NONULL
close 1
print"Done!"
passed=1
endif

color 15,0
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
color 7,0
print"[A] Level.: ";
temp$=world$
gosub fix_str:
print a$;
print" - Legal Values 0-11 (12 levels)"
print"[B] Health: ";
temp$=health$
gosub fix_str:
print a$;
print" - Legal Values 1-8 (255 for invinsibility)"
print"[C] Gun...: ";
temp$=gun$
gosub fix_str:
print a$;
print" - Legal Values 1-4"
print"[D] Score.: ";
score1=instr(score$,d1$)
score1=score1-1
score1$=left$(score$,score1)
print score1$

print"[E] Boots.: ";
temp$=boots$
boots=1
gosub yes_no:
boots=0
print a$
print"[F] Claw..: ";
temp$=claw$
gosub yes_no:
print a$
print"[G] Hand..: ";
temp$=hand$
gosub yes_no:
print a$
print"[H] Save changes and exit"
print" "
print"Your choice: ";
legal1=64
legal2=73
call sub "securekey" legal1,legal2,a$

if a$="A" then
print"ю Level Edit"
color 15,0
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
print"Level 0 is where you start out when selecting a new "
print"game. Some episodes even on level 11, will make you"
print"enter another door, leading to the end guy."
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
color 7,0
print"Enter new level (0-11): ";
call sub "secureinput" temp$,secinp
min=-1
max=12
gosub refix:
if safe=1 then
world$=temp$
endif
endif

if a$="B" then
print"ю Health Edit"
color 15,0
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
print"Your health ranges from 1 (critical, one hit you die)"
print"to 8 (full). You can be for most purposes unkillable"
print"if you use value 255, and do NOT get any health items"
print"during gameplay. This will not save you if you throw"
print"yourself into one of those pesky generators."
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
color 7,0

print"Enter new health: ";
call sub "secureinput" temp$,secinp
min=0
max=256
gosub refix:
if safe=1 then
health$=temp$
endif
endif

if a$="C" then
print"ю Gun Energy Edit"
color 15,0
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
print"Your gun ranges from level 1 (you start out at this)"
print"to level 4 (being the most powerful)."
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
color 7,0

print"Enter new gun level (1-4): ";
call sub "secureinput" temp$,secinp
min=0
max=5
gosub refix:
if safe=1 then
gun$=temp$
endif
endif

if a$="D" then
print"ю Score Edit (cheater..heh)"
color 15,0
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
print"Game score only has 8 places.ie:12345678. If you go"
print"beyond this, it will look like you rolled the score."
print"but, once you either beat or quit the game, You'll"
print"see you didn't roll it, your score just got so big"
print"it doesn't show all of it in the game. If you don't"
print"want to be incredibly lame, press enter and your"
print"score won't be touched."
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
color 7,0

print"Enter new score: ";
call sub "secureinput" score1$,secinp
if score1$<>"" then
score$=score1$+d1$
endif
endif

if a$="E" then
print"ю Boot Edit"
color 15,0
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
print"Boots let you jump higher then normal. There needed"
print"on higher levels, but you can enjoy them on lower"
print"ones now too. :-)"
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
color 7,0

temp$="boots"
gosub on_off:
boots$=temp$
endif

if a$="F" then
print"ю Claw Edit"
color 15,0
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
print"The claw allows you to grasp onto platforms on later"
print"levels to move around, and even climb. It's useless"
print"on levels without special teeth-like platforms."
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
color 7,0

temp$="claw"
gosub on_off:
claw$=temp$
endif

if a$="G" then
print"ю Hand Edit"
color 15,0
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
print"The hand is one of the seldom used items. Its only"
print"purpose is to act like an access key. Making bridges"
print"and not triggering a booby-trap."
print"ДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДДД"
color 7,0

temp$="hand"
gosub on_off:
hand$=temp$
endif

if a$="H" then
print"Exiting..."
print"ю Writing Changes...";
open"r",1,begi$
a=filepos(1,8)
print #1,world$
print #1,world$
a=filepos(1,16)
print #1,health$
a=filepos(1,12)
print #1,boots$
a=filepos(1,14)
print #1,claw$
a=filepos(1,18)
print #1,hand$
a=filepos(1,10)
print #1,gun$
a=filepos(1,44)
print #1,score$ NONULL
close 1
print"Done!"
print"Questions? Comments? Email me: Rus...@juno.com"
end
endif
goto main1:

fix_str:
rem converts the byte into a normal number for the user
a=asc(temp$)
a$=str$(a)
a$=ltrim$(a$)
return

yes_no:
a=asc(temp$)
if boots=1 then
b$="them."
else
b$="it."
endif
if a=0 then
a$="You don't have "
else
a$="You have "
endif
a$=a$+b$
return

refix:
safe=0
a=val(temp$)
if a>min then
if a<max then
temp$=chr$(a)
safe=1
endif
endif
return

on_off:
print"Do you want the ";
print temp$;
print" (0=no/1=yes): ";
legal1=47
legal2=50
call sub "securekey" legal1,legal2,a$
a=val(a$)
if a=1 then
print"Yes!"
else
print"No!"
endif
temp$=chr$(a)
return

Here's some newer code, from 2004; it converts kdc files to jpegs.
Useless to you unless you have one of the older kdc cameras...

data &hexff,&hexd8,&hexe0,&hexe0,&hex00,&hex10,&hex4a,&hex46
data &hex49,&hex46,&hex00,&hex01,&hex02,&hex01,&hex00,&hex64
data &hex00,&hex4b,&hex00,&hex00
rem Jpeg header Woot
open"o",3,"kdcconv.txt"
cr$=chr$(13)
lf$=chr$(10
crlf$=cr$+lf$

SEARCH$="*.KDC"
ATTRIB=0
FILENAME$=FIND FIRST (SEARCH$,ATTRIB)
IF ERROR>0 THEN
leave=2
else
leave=1
endif
gosub convert:
while leave=1
FILENAME$=FIND CONTINUE
IF ERROR>0 THEN
leave=2
endif
if filename$<>"" then
gosub convert:
endif
wend
print #3, "Files Converted: " nonull
files$=str$(files)
print #3,files$ nonull
print"files converted: ";
print files
close 1
close 2
close 3
end

convert:
rem Deal with filename...
a=len(filename$)
a=a-4
dstfile$=left$(filename$,a)
dstfile$=dstfile$+".JPG"

open"r",1,filename$
a=filepos(1,707)
input #1,a$ byte
a=asc(a$)
if a<>7 then
print"Oops! ";
print filename$;
print" is not a compressed Kodak image file"
print"I can't do any conversion of this file for you. Sorry."
print #3, filename$ nonull
print #3," could not be converted; wasn't a compressed file." nonull
print #3 crlf$ nonull
close 1
return
endif
print filename$;
print" is a compressed kodak image file. Converting to"
print"a standard Jpeg (jpg) ";
print dstfile$;
print" file. One Moment...";
print #3, filename$ nonull
print #3," was successfully converted to " nonull
print #3,dstfile$ nonull
print #3,crlf$ nonull
a=filepos(1,15682)
files=files+1
open"o",2,dstfile$

gosub write_header:
kewl=1
while kewl=1
input #1,a$ byte
if error=99 then
kewl=2
endif

input #1,b$ byte
if error=99 then
kewl=2
endif
if kewl=2 then
print"Done!"
close 1
close 2
return
endif

gosub write_new_data:
wend

write_header:
rem module to write a standard jpeg file header.. how lame.
for x=1 to 20
read a
a$=chr$(a)
if a$="" then
print #2,a$
else
print #2,a$ nonull
endif
next x
restore
return

write_new_data:
if b$="" then
print #2,b$
else
print #2,b$ nonull
endif
if a$="" then
print #2,a$
else
print #2,a$ nonull
endif
return

Here's the source code to a custom application I wrote this year for a
mini storage site.

rem rock springs mini storage customer database program
rem v1.01
screen 0
call sub "ibcritinit"

gosub main_menu:
froggie=1
while froggie=1
gosub getkey:

if a$="A" then
gosub add_user:
gosub main_menu:
endif

if a$="B" then
custid=1
gosub review_customers:
gosub main_menu:
endif

if a$="C" then
gosub month_income:
gosub main_menu:
endif

if a$="D" then
gosub search_customer:
gosub main_menu:
endif

if a$="E" then
gosub due_scan:
gosub main_menu:
endif

if a$="F" then
froggie=0
endif
wend
end

add_user:
rem routine to add a user to the system.
rem we have to find out how many active customers
rem are currently in the system. We do this by checking
rem total customer count file, "cust.id"
open"i",1,"cust.id"
if error=0 then
input #1,custid
close 1
custid=custid+1
else
custid=1
endif
custid1$=str$(custid)
custid1$=ltrim$(custid1$)
custid1$=rtrim$(custid1$)
gosub get_cust_info:
if aname1$<>"" then
cls
custid$="cust."
a$=str$(custid)
a$=ltrim$(a$)
d1$=a$
custid$=custid$+a$
payid$="paydata."
payid$=payid$+d1$
totalcustomers=custid
open"o",1,"cust.id"
print #1,custid
close 1
open"o",1,payid$
close 1
open"o",1,custid$
print #1,deposit
print #1,leaseamount@
print #1,unit$
print #1,aname$
print #1,address$
print #1,phoneh$
print #1,phonew$
print #1,leasedate$
print #1,duedate$
print #1,unitsize$
close 1
else
custid=custid-1
endif
return

main_menu:
cls
call sub "DisplayFile" "main.txt"
rem main menu on screen.
return

review_customers:
open"i",1,"cust.id"
input #1,totalcustomers
close 1
if totalcustomers>0 then
cls
exitflag=0
while exitflag=0
cls
call sub "DisplayFile" "custinfo.txt"
if custid<1 then
custid=1
endif
if custid>totalcustomers then
custid=totalcustomers
endif
gosub read_customer_id:
lockedout=0
testlock$="lock."
testlock$=testlock$+a$
open"I",1,testlock$
if error=0 then
input #1,lockoutdate$
close 1
locate 9, 24
color 14,0
print"LOCKED OUT! - ";
print lockoutdate$
lockedout=1
color 7,0
endif

locate 9,18
print a$
locate 10,18
print aname$
locate 11,18
print address$
locate 12,18
print phoneh$
locate 13,18
print phonew$
locate 14,18
print leasedate$
locate 15,18
a$=str$(leaseamount@)
a$=ltrim$(a$)
a$=rtrim$(a$)
leaseamount$=a$
print leaseamount$
locate 16,18
print duedate$
locate 17,18
print Unit$
locate 18,18
print unitsize$
locate 19,18
if deposit=1 then
print"Yes."
else
print"No."
endif
locate 21,0
print"[N]-Next Customer, [P]-Previous Customer, [Q]-Quit to Main"
print"[E]-Edit This Customer, [S] - Show Payment History, [J] - Jump to
Cust ID#"
print"[A]-Accept a Payment, [L] - Toggle Customer Lockout"
loops=1
while loops=1

gosub getkey:
if a$="N" then
custid=custid+1
loops=0
endif
if a$="P" then
custid=custid-1
loops=0
endif
if a$="E" then
gosub edit_user:
loops=0
endif
if a$="J" then
print"Cust #: ";
input custid1;
if custid1>totalcustomers then
custid1=totalcustomers
endif
if custid1<1 then
custid1=custid
endif

if custid1<>custid then
custid=custid1
endif
loops=0
endif

if a$="Q" then
exitflag=1
loops=0
endif
if a$="S" then
gosub paymenthistory:
loops=0
endif
if a$="A" then
gosub record_payment:
loops=0
endif

if a$="L" then
if lockedout=1 then
kill testlock$
else
d2$=date$
open"o",1,testlock$
print #1,d2$
close 1
loops=0
endif
endif

wend
wend
endif

return

read_customer_id:
custid$="cust."
a$=str$(custid)
a$=ltrim$(a$)
custid1$=a$
custid$=custid$+a$
open"i",1,custid$
input #1,deposit
input #1,leaseamount@
input #1,unit$
input #1,aname$
input #1,address$
input #1,phoneh$
input #1,phonew$
input #1,leasedate$
input #1,duedate$
input #1,unitsize$
close 1
payid$="paydata."
payid$=payid$+custid1$
open "i",1,payid$
if error>0 then
balance@=0@
debit@=0@
credit@=0@
else
totalrecords&=filelen(payid$)
totalrecords&=totalrecords&/34
for x&=1& to totalrecords&
input #1,thedate$
input #1,debit@
input #1,credit@
input #1,balance@
next x&
close 1
endif
return

getkey:
loops=1
while loops=1
a$=inkey$
a$=ucase$(a$)
if a$<>"" then
loops=0
endif
wend
return

edit_user:
cls
gosub get_cust_info:
print""
custid$="cust."
a$=str$(custid)
a$=ltrim$(a$)
custid$=custid$+a$
open"o",1,custid$
print #1,deposit
print #1,leaseamount@
print #1,unit$
print #1,aname$
print #1,address$
print #1,phoneh$
print #1,phonew$
print #1,leasedate$
print #1,duedate$
print #1,unitsize$
close 1
return

record_payment:
payid$="paydata."
payid$=payid$+custid1$
open "a",1,payid$
print"Payment Date: ";
thedate$=date$
print thedate$
print"Enter new date or enter to use one shown."
print">";
input newdate$;
if newdate$<>"" then
thedate$=newdate$
endif
print""
print"Debit: ";
input debit@
print""
print"Credit: ";
input credit@
print""
balance@=balance@+credit@
balance@=balance@-debit@
print #1,thedate$
print #1,debit@
print #1,credit@
print #1,balance@
close 1
return

paymenthistory:
print"Date Debit Credit Balance"
print"===================================================================
==="
payid$="paydata."
payid$=payid$+custid1$
open "i",1,payid$
totalrecords&=filelen(payid$)
totalrecords&=totalrecords&/34
if totalrecords&>0& then
for x&=1& to totalrecords&
input #1,thedate$
input #1,debit@
input #1,credit@
input #1,balance@
print thedate$;
print debit@;
print credit@;
print balance@
next x&
close 1

else
close 1
print"No paydata history found for this customer ID."
endif
gosub getkey:
return

search_customer:
print""
print"Customer Search Options:"
print""
print"[A] - Search By Name"
print"[B] - Search By Address"
print"[C] - Search by Phone #"
print""
print"Your selection: ";
gosub getkey:
if a$="A" then
search_parm=1
endif
if a$="B" then
search_parm=2
endif
if a$="C" then
search_parm=3
endif
print""
print"Enter Search Criteria:"
print">";
input searchie$;
if searchie$<>"" then
print""
print"Please Wait... Searching for matches..."
gosub do_the_search:
print"No more matches found! - Press a key"
gosub getkey:
endif
return

due_scan:
print""
print"Searching for customers who are due or overdue..."
due$=date$
due1$=mid$(due$,4,2)
due$=due1$
open"i",1,"cust.id"
if error=0 then
input #1,totalcustomers
close 1
for x=1 to totalcustomers
custid=x
gosub read_customer_id:
rem compare date with due date
if due$=duedate$ then
nocrlf=1
gosub matches:
print" is due today!"
print"-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----"

endif
if due$>duedate$ then
nocrlf=1
gosub matches:
print" is late!"
print"-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----"
endif
next x
endif
print"No more matches - Press a key to return to Main."
gosub getkey:
nocrlf=0
return

do_the_search:
open"i",1,"cust.id"
input #1,totalcustomers
close 1
for x=1 to totalcustomers
custid=x
gosub read_customer_id:
test1$=ucase$(searchie$)
if search_parm=1 then
test2$=ucase$(aname$)
endif

if search_parm=2 then
test2$=ucase$(address$)
endif

if search_parm=3 then
test2$=phoneh$+phonew$
test2$=ucase$(test2$)
endif

if search_parm>0 then
ar=instr(test2$,test1$)
if ar>0 then
gosub matches:
print"-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----"
endif
endif
next x
return

matches:
print"Cust ID#: ";
print custid1$;
print", ";
print aname$;
print", ";
print address$
print"Phone #'s: ";
print phoneh$;
print" (h) ";
print phonew$;
if nocrlf=1 then
print" (w)";
else
print" (w)"
endif
return

get_cust_info:
print"Customer ID: ";
print custid1$
print"This ID will be assigned to this user for the duration of it's"
print"existance."
print""
print"Account Name: ";
call sub "secureinput" aname1$,secinp
print"Address: ";
call sub "secureinput" address1$,secinp
print"Home Phone..: ";
call sub "secureinput" phoneh1$,secinp
print"Work Phone..: ";
call sub "secureinput" phonew1$,secinp
print"Lease Date..: ";
call sub "secureinput" leasedate1$,secinp
print"Lease Amount: ";
call sub "secureinput" leaseamount$,secinp

print""
print"Due Date....: ";
call sub "secureinput" duedate1$,secinp
print "Assign unit #: ";
call sub "secureinput" unit1$,secinp
print "Unit Size: ";
call sub "secureinput" unitsize1$,secinp
print"Deposit made (1=Yes/0=No) :";
input deposit1

if aname1$<>"" then
aname$=aname1$

endif

if address1$<>"" then
address$=address1$
endif

if phonew1$<>"" then
phonew$=phonew1$
endif

if phoneh1$<>"" then
phoneh$=phoneh1$
endif

if leasedate1$<>"" then
leasedate$=leasedate1$
endif

if duedate1$<>"" then
duedate$=duedate1$
endif

leaseamount1@=val(leaseamount$)
if leaseamount$<>"" then
leaseamount@=leaseamount1@
endif

if unit1$<>"" then
unit$=unit1$
endif

if unitsize1$<>"" then
unitsize$=unitsize1$
endif

if deposit1<>deposit then
deposit=deposit1
endif
return

month_income:
totalcredit@=0@
open"i",1,"cust.id"
input #1,custid
close 1
for z=1 to custid
custid1$=str$(z)
custid1$=ltrim$(custid1$)
custid1$=rtrim$(custid1$)
payid$="paydata."
payid$=payid$+custid1$
open "i",1,payid$
totalrecords&=filelen(payid$)
totalrecords&=totalrecords&/34
for x&=1& to totalrecords&
input #1,thedate$
input #1,debit@
input #1,credit@
input #1,balance@
yearcustomer$=right$(thedate$,4)
monthcustomer$=left$(thedate$,2)
currentyear$=date$
currentmonth$=left$(currentyear$,2)
currentlyyear$=right$(currentyear$,4)
rem print payid$
rem print yearcustomer$
rem print monthcustomer$
rem print thedate$
if yearcustomer$=currentlyyear$ then
if currentmonth$=monthcustomer$ then
totalcredit@=totalcredit@+credit@
endif
endif
next x&
close 1
next z
print"Totals for the month ";
print currentmonth$;
print", ";
print currentlyyear$;
a$=str$(totalcredit@)
a$=ltrim$(a$)
a$=rtrim$(a$)
print" =";
print a$
gosub getkey:
return

So yea 4Q, my code has improved ever so slightly since the code you got
was written. <g>

> *HAHAHAHHAHAHA* *ROFL*

Exactly. See above for the punchline. :)

4Q

unread,

Nov 21, 2007, 7:00:34 AM11/21/07

to

Nirodh Cook wrote:
> 4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in
> news:8afefead-738e-440f...@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
>
> > Nirodh Cook wrote:
> >> 4Q <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:fe894f24-67ce-473f...@i37g2000hsd.googlegroups.com
> >> :
> >>
> >> >> Nothing pretend about the fact you've been removed from my
> >> >> killfile.
> >> >
> >> > *HAHAHA* Caught with your pants down
> >> > again Dustfuck! Was this the same excuse
> >> > you used last time you conveniently
> >> > unkillfiled to read all my posts *LOL*
> >>
> >> *yawn*. 4Q, I know, simple things are hard for you to understand, but
> >> the fact of the matter is simple. I removed you from a killfilter
> >
> > *snicker* you stupid super-sized used
> > condom! You keep getting caught, anytime
> > I rattle your cage you magically jump
> > out from behind your pretend killfile
>
> 4Q, please; your hardly rattling anybodies cage here.

Dustbin, you make such a big deal out of
telling everybody you've killfiled me
and a few later you reply to the post
you've killfiled! It's not like you have
only done it the one time, you keep doing
it and it makes you look stupid. Get it
through your thick numbskull that no one
is fooled with your "he's in he's out,
he's in he's out" childish bullshit.

I'll deal with the rest of your schoolboy
crap later.

4Q

=====================================
=====================================

> print"DnHaCK v1.0** (saved game editor) - Coded By: RustBug"

> print"Works with Duke Nukem (v2.0) episodes 1 2 and 3"
> print"program written and compiled on 10/11/97 2:17am"