Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Should I convert from Q2009 to Q2010?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Gary

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 8:10:47 PM11/4/09
to
I think I can get a free copy of Q2010. But all the problems I see
posted cause me to wonder whether I'd be doing an aggravating thing
converting over right now. What do you think?

Margaret

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 10:44:02 AM11/5/09
to

Upgrade! Especially if your upgrade is "free." I liked 2009 just fine,
but I am very happy with 2010. It might be a tad faster, too.

Regards,

Margaret

XS11E

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:14:28 PM11/5/09
to
Gary <gar...@hotmail.com> wrote:

A. I have NO problems with 2010

B. You can always go back, pay attention to where the 2010 install
saves your old files or you can save a backup to CD or flash drive.

C. Why didn't I get a free copy? <G>


--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/

B

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:50:47 PM11/5/09
to
Don't forget that the things that people post in these forums are
primarily requests for help. People who don't experience problems
generally don't have a reason to post.

ps56k

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:49:32 PM11/5/09
to

"B" <b...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:hcvaaj$2l3$2...@news.eternal-september.org...

yup - using Q2009 - totally for stocks investments & checking account
ledger -
no probs, only upgrade when forced every couple of years because of the
downloading going away...

Really used to use the stock links into Yahoo Financial all the time for
news, hi/low, etc -
but ever since Intuit broke it all and took it in-house, their internal
stuff is crap
and I never go there anymore.... hi/lo gone - alerts useless - news is only
PR - graphs simple minded -

SO... I use Q2009 for the bookkeeping, and go to Yahoo Finance for news,
graphs, etc
Can't imagine Q2010 gives back anything more.... probably just closes the
noose -


Andrew

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 10:49:17 PM11/5/09
to
Margaret wrote:
> It might be a tad faster, too.
>
> Regards,
>
> Margaret

Any new meaningful functionality that you've found, Margaret?

--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Regards -

- Andrew


0 new messages