On Tuesday 21 February 2012 10:52, Mel Bourne conveyed the following to
alt.comp.os.linux...
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:58:18 +0100, Aragorn wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 21 February 2012 09:17, Mel Bourne conveyed the following
>> to alt.comp.linux...
>>
>>> Absolute Beginner.
>>>
>>> I installed from a CD Ubuntu 11.10 alongside Win XP (dual boot).
>>> The installer automatically created 2 new partitions for Ubuntu.
>>> All went well, I was able to download all updates for the operating
>>> system and (NVIDIA) driver. I also successfully changed the booting
>>> sequences.
>>>
>>> I then was trying setting up dual monitors which proved to be a
>>> futile exercise.
>>>
>>> Even after numerous reboots the monitors did not display anything
>>> but instead produced 'black screens' or 'Ubuntu default color'
>>> without any icons to click on.
>>>
>>> I mouse-clicked (left and right) all over the screens but no
>>> responses.
>>
>> I don't know what was the cause of your problem here, but there is a
>> brief tutorial on how to set up dual monitors with Ubuntu, here...
>>
>>
http://tinyurl.com/27dfzj6
>>
>> (
http://preview.tinyurl.com/27dfzj6)
>
> Thanks for the links, I will go thru these documents carfully.
It's one link, actually. The second one is just a courtesy link for in
the event that people mistrust the poster, given that TinyURL is a
redirector and that one never knows in advance what it points to. The
second link tells you what it points to without opening the quoted link.
;-)
Well, Ubuntu is non-standard in many ways. For one, it has a special
graphical interface called Unity, developed by Canonical. Unity was
originally intended to be a GUI for netbooks, but then Canonical started
pushing it for regular desktop workstations as well.
Furthermore, Ubuntu uses Upstart instead of a traditional SysV init
system and will soon be switching to Wayland as the display server,
whereas most other distributions still prefer sticking to an X11 display
server. Wayland is faster because it runs in the kernel, but at the
same time, the more things run in the kernel, the more risks there are
for system stability. And in addition to that, Wayland does not support
network transparency, while X11 does.
In overall, Mint appears to be garnering more favor than Ubuntu these
days, and even Distrowatch seems to confirm this.
> I just want to learn and get used of the Linuxs system. Once I'm more
> confident and familiar I ditch Windows for good.
Do bear in mind that GNU/Linux is a UNIX-style operating system, and
that the whole paradigm of UNIX is entirely juxtaposed to that of
Microsoft Windows. Weaning yourself off from the Microsoft Think (tm)
should be your first priority.
Therefore, it is probably best that you go with a more general purpose
distribution than with something so "branded" as Ubuntu. Of course,
there are variants of Ubuntu with a different graphical user interface -
e.g. Xubuntu (with XFCE) or Lubuntu (with LXDE) - and nothing stops you
from installing the packages of such an alternative desktop environment
even on Ubuntu proper, but as a beginner you would probably want
something more versatile "out of the box".
>>> Questions:
>>> What precautions and prerequisites need to be observed in order
>>> to re-install Ubuntu to the free space of my hard disk drive?
>>
>> Nothing special. What you did earlier will still work.
>
> Well, earlier my hard drive wasn't partitioned! I used the recommended
> Automatic partition resizing option, Ubuntu installer created the
> partitions itself.
>
> Since I have now a 'free space partition' will Ubuntu installer
> recognise this (the free space partition) and install itself to the
> free space? (I am concerned that the Ubuntu installer may create 2
> more partitions).
Yes, it will use the free space. Generally, the partitioning tools in
distribution installers pull some "magic" in order to identify existing
operating systems by way of the partition table entries.
A partition table entry always has a field for the type of partition
[*], which generally corresponds to the filesystem on the partition, but
this need not necessarily be the case. So if there is empty space and
the installer finds an existing installation - or Windows - then it will
leave those alone and it will use the empty space.
[*] A Linux-native filesystem will have partition type "83". This is
for filesystems that the Linux kernel has native support for, i.e.
filesystems that the system itself can be installed on. At present,
this comprises of the following filesystem types: ext2, ext3, ext4,
reiserfs, xfs, jfs, and btrfs (with kernels that support this).
Type "82" is reserved for "Linux swap". Other types may correspond
to msdos/vfat (FAT/FAT32), HPFS/NTFS (OS/2 and NT-based Windows),
Solaris, et al.
Note: UNIX systems in general do not care whether a partition is
primary or logical, but unless you have a GPT hard disk, you can
only have 4 primary partitions as per hardware design - the legacy
BIOS boot code checks for that - and if you need more partitions,
then one of the primary partitions has to be an extended partition
container with logical partitions in it. You can also use logical
volume management instead, but that's a bit more complicated to set
up for a newbie. It is however more flexible, because LVM volumes
can be enlarged easily, and they also offer snapshot functionality.