The Noise
Susan Bugher
thread:
"The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
individual:
the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
Susan
--
Posted to alt.comp.freeware
Search alt.comp.freeware (or read it online):
http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?q=+group:alt.comp.freeware
Pricelessware & ACF: http://www.pricelesswarehome.org
Pricelessware: http://www.pricelessware.org (not maintained)
Why Tea
> Yesterday's winners:
>
> thread:
> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>
> individual:
> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>
Sounds like an answer to BB's "All time highest ACF posters". Let's
see how many posts will this thread get.
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
> Yesterday's winners:
>
> thread:
> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>
> individual:
> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>
> Susan
...and it ain't over yet. BTW...who are you point person for?
--
Bear Bottoms
Freeware website http://bearbottoms1.com
Kat Mandu
> Yesterday's winners:
>
> thread:
> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>
> individual:
> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>
> Susan
Hmmm. No credit at all given to Anne for starting the thread?
And FLASH: Jack D. Russell, Sr. looks like a good bet on being the
winner today!
Bear Bottoms
Guess I'll have to step up the noise to keep up.
Thip
"Susan Bugher" <sebu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5fv1g3F...@mid.individual.net...
> Yesterday's winners:
>
> thread:
> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>
> individual:
> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>
> Susan
And noise it is. The kind where you stick your fingers in your ears and
sing "LALALALALALAAAAAAAAA" at the top of your lungs so you don't have to
listen.
Killfiles are your friend.
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:07:42 -0500 'Bear Bottoms'
> posted this onto alt.comp.freeware:
>
>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:50:47 -0500, Susan Bugher <sebu...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yesterday's winners:
>>>
>>> thread:
>>> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>>>
>>> individual:
>>> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
>>> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
>>> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>>>
>>> Susan
>>
>> ...and it ain't over yet. BTW...who are you point person for?
>
> 1.that's 25 posts of Franklin's I haven't seen. WoW! Fantastic.
>
> 2.if she wanted to do some real analysis she might think of producing
> some data on how many of the total posts contained constructive
> proposals and how many were just more of the same tripe from her
> sheep herd. I guess that's a level of reality she couldn't cope with.
>
Pricelessware is firmly implanted in this newsgroup and is using it for
their own purpose. As with most of these type agendas, they will
demonstrate whatever is necessary to maintain that foothold and continue
to try and dominate the group. This has well be witnessed.
Susan Bugher
>>"Susan Bugher" <sebu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:5fv1g3F...@mid.individual.net...
>>>Yesterday's winners:
>>>
>>>thread:
>>>"The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>>>
>>>individual:
>>>the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
>>>1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
>>>2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
> Bugher's comments might be more interesting if her figures were
> not completely false. BB's = 32 not 51. Mine = 23 not 36.
You deny you made 36 posts yesterday?
iNcReDuLoUs
@mid.individual.net:
> Yesterday's winners:
>
> thread:
> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>
> individual:
> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
At least one of the delusional duo seems to be having some difficulty
understanding the separate categories, "thread" and "individual".
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
> hummingbird wrote:
>>> "Susan Bugher" <sebu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5fv1g3F...@mid.individual.net...
>
>>>> Yesterday's winners:
>>>>
>>>> thread:
>>>> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>>>>
>>>> individual:
>>>> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
>>>> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
>>>> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>
>> Bugher's comments might be more interesting if her figures were not
>> completely false. BB's = 32 not 51. Mine = 23 not 36.
>
> You deny you made 36 posts yesterday?
>
> Susan
LOL...squirming worm. So you list a thread, but you are giving total posts
beyond that thread? What games we play.
jon
Susan Bugher wrote:
>Yesterday's winners:
>
>thread:
>"The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>
>individual:
>the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
>1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
>2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
You need a better stats tool, newbie
Header-statistics for: From:
The War
135 100.00% (probe count)
31 22.96% "Bear Bottoms" <bearbo...@gmai.com>
23 17.04% hummingbird <hummi...@2die4.com>
19 14.07% "Jack D. Russell, Sr."
<jackru$$el...@notmail.com.invalid>
15 11.11% Franklin <fran...@nomail.com>
15 11.11% "Lew/+Silat" <Drafted1970...@Invalid.com>
7 5.19% Global Warming <yourek...@spam.net>
4 2.96% iNcReDuLoUs <inv...@invalid.invalid>
3 2.22% Thorsten Duhn <Thorst...@editorial.de>
3 2.22% Yrrah <Yrrah.sp...@hitmail.com>
3 2.22% an...@munge.com
2 1.48% Kat Mandu <Ma...@isp.ne>
2 1.48% Tumingin <tumi...@tumingin.invalid>
2 1.48% elaich <a@b.c>
6 4.44% (others)
Susan Bugher
> You need a better stats tool, newbie
You need lessons in reading comprehension.
jon
Susan Bugher wrote:
>jon wrote:
>
>> You need a better stats tool, newbie
>
>You need lessons in reading comprehension.
I hate it when you are right... :-)
Anyways - yer stats are still adrift on UK time:
Header-statistics for: From:
14th July GMT+ 0100
303 100.00%
70 23.10% "Bear Bottoms" <bearbo...@gmai.com>
44 14.52% Franklin <fran...@nomail.com>
31 10.23% hummingbird <hummi...@2die4.com>
16 5.28% Roger Hunt <nos...@nospam.demon.co.uk>
15 4.95% Kat Mandu <Ma...@isp.ne>
10 3.30% Craig <netbu...@REMOVEgmail.com>
10 3.30% Global Warming <yourek...@spam.net>
8 2.64% Susan Bugher <sebu...@yahoo.com>
6 1.98% "Lew/+Silat" <Drafted1970...@Invalid.com>
5 1.65% Yrrah <Yrrah.sp...@hitmail.com>
4 1.32% »Q« <box...@gmx.net>
4 1.32% Thorsten Duhn <Thorst...@editorial.de>
4 1.32% iNcReDuLoUs <inv...@invalid.invalid>
3 0.99% use_a_...@yahoo.com
3 0.99% Aaron <aaronne...@gmail.com>
3 0.99% jm...@webace.com.au
3 0.99% "gavin" <thes...@cosmicdancer.freeserve.co.uk>
3 0.99% Krazee Brenda <in...@sanibleone.com>
2 0.66% Mike Dee <mik...@emteedee.invalid>
2 0.66% James UK <nom...@nomailthanks.com>
2 0.66% an...@munge.com
2 0.66% Michael Reichenbach <Reich...@discardmail.com>
2 0.66% re...@to.newsgroup.only
2 0.66% REM <REMbr...@netscape.com>
2 0.66% Luis Santos <lcds...@gmail.com>
2 0.66% dsmey <dave...@gmail.com>
2 0.66% Tumingin <tumi...@tumingin.invalid>
2 0.66% "©®" <n0...@n0ne.com>
2 0.66% "Frank Bohan" <fra...@sparkingwire.com>
39 12.87% (others)
iNcReDuLoUs
$c3e...@news.astraweb.com:
My apologies, Susan. I see you've already noticed hummingbottoms'
response. I'll blame my slow nsp, if you don't mind :)
Kat Mandu
> In <news:5fvbuiF...@mid.individual.net>,
> Susan Bugher <sebu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> hummingbird wrote:
>>>> "Susan Bugher" <sebu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:5fv1g3F...@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> Yesterday's winners:
>>>>>
>>>>> thread:
>>>>> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>>>>>
>>>>> individual:
>>>>> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
>>>>> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
>>>>> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>>> Bugher's comments might be more interesting if her figures were
>>> not completely false. BB's = 32 not 51. Mine = 23 not 36.
>> You deny you made 36 posts yesterday?
>
> that the thread award and the individual awards were separate.
>
> Counts may vary a bit, depending on the timezone of the one doing the
> counting by day.
>
Regardless of all that, I'm indignant for not being awarded even a
measly Honorable Mention for *my* efforts at raising the noise level.
What's a guy got to do to get noticed around here?
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
These are the stats so far this month: Susan is hogging her share with
9200+ posts. I'm getting mine.
This month
467 bearbotto...@gmai.com
379 hummingb...@2die4.com
326 franks...@nomail.com
212 ma...@isp.ne
145 i...@sanibleone.com
141 mcdaddu...@hhotmail.ccom.invalid
140 sebug...@yahoo.com
104 boxc...@gmx.net
83 netburg...@removegmail.com
68 daniel_man...@aon.at
All time
10813 m...@privacy.net
7465 no.s...@box.invalid
5554 jcorl...@ccountry.net
4731 whoisebug...@kvi.net
4518 sebug...@yahoo.com
4330 bearbotto...@gmai.com
4081 jcorl...@fake.invalid
3598 willowbrookem...@WATERworldnet.att.net
3496 boxc...@gmx.net
2899 SonOf...@whatever.net
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
> jon wrote:
>
>> You need a better stats tool, newbie
>
> You need lessons in reading comprehension.
>
> Susan
You need clarity of projection lessons.
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
> Susan Bugher wrote:
>
>> jon wrote:
>>
>>> You need a better stats tool, newbie
>>
>> You need lessons in reading comprehension.
> I hate it when you are right...
> Anyways - yer stats are still adrift on UK time:
You are not the only one she confused. It is a clarity of projection issue.
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
Posted in lack of clarity projection...for Susan's benefit.
jon
Kat Mandu wrote:
>Regardless of all that, I'm indignant for not being awarded even a
>measly Honorable Mention for *my* efforts at raising the noise level.
>What's a guy got to do to get noticed around here?
You're in at number 5 in my stats list for the 14th.
Points are currently being awarded for those further down the list...
Susan Bugher
> Susan Bugher wrote:
>>jon wrote:
>>>You need a better stats tool, newbie
>>
>>You need lessons in reading comprehension.
>
> I hate it when you are right... :-)
>
> Anyways - yer stats are still adrift on UK time:
The count I posted was based on the posting time displayed by my
newsreader. Given the number of posts that are spewed out in a brief
period of time by some ng participants 24-hour counts may vary quite a
bit from time zone to time zone.
jon
Susan Bugher wrote:
>The count I posted was based on the posting time displayed by my
>newsreader. Given the number of posts that are spewed out in a brief
>period of time by some ng participants 24-hour counts may vary quite a
>bit from time zone to time zone.
I know. Don't get yer knickers in a twist.
*group hug* :-)
('cept for bum and bum, er, hum)
Kat Mandu
> Kat Mandu wrote:
>
>> Regardless of all that, I'm indignant for not being awarded even a
>> measly Honorable Mention for *my* efforts at raising the noise level.
>> What's a guy got to do to get noticed around here?
>
> You're in at number 5 in my stats list for the 14th.
I guess I have been slouching a bit lately.
>
> Points are currently being awarded for those further down the list...
Where'd you come in?
Susan Bugher
> Susan Bugher wrote:
>>The count I posted was based on the posting time displayed by my
>>newsreader. Given the number of posts that are spewed out in a brief
>>period of time by some ng participants 24-hour counts may vary quite a
>>bit from time zone to time zone.
>
> I know. Don't get yer knickers in a twist.
No worries. That was just an FYI (as was the original post).
> *group hug* :-)
<another group hug> ACF rocks!
> ('cept for bum and bum, er, hum)
Susan
Susan Bugher
I wonder if they watch the Oscar awards. . .
and, if they do, what they make of them. ;)
jon
Kat Mandu wrote:
>jon wrote:
>> Kat Mandu wrote:
>>> Regardless of all that, I'm indignant for not being awarded even a
>>> measly Honorable Mention for *my* efforts at raising the noise level.
>>> What's a guy got to do to get noticed around here?
>> You're in at number 5 in my stats list for the 14th.
>I guess I have been slouching a bit lately.
Excellent. The on topic freeware posters tend to be dropping down the
list. This is a good thing.
>> Points are currently being awarded for those further down the list...
>
>Where'd you come in?
*sigh* Do you read the group or just post to it?
Message-ID: <dc808c26039f1b10ced5fd66b219a6danp@mcdaddums.3>
jon
Susan Bugher wrote:
>I wonder if they watch the Oscar awards. . .
>and, if they do, what they make of them. ;)
Conspiracy.
Barebum would rant and rave at why the worst Rambo film was excluded.
bummingbird would rant and rave at why the worst Derek Jarman film was
excluded.
Kat Mandu
Well, you gave the following stats and I don't find you listed at all.
Does this mean that you post so rarely as to be among the "others"?
--------------quote---------------
--------------unquote---------------------
jon
hummingbird wrote:
>Nobody working
>for me would get away with such an amateurish presentation of data.
Has anybody ever 'worked for you'?
I thought you/they worked for IBM.
My analysis of your posting history to usenet could easily be flawed -
I am dim at the best of times - but have you *really* had anybody
'working for you' in the last 15 years or so?
*snigger*
iNcReDuLoUs
127.0.0.1:
> On 15 Jul 2007, Bear Bottoms <bearbo...@gmai.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:52:02 -0500, iNcReDuLoUs
>> <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Susan Bugher <sebu...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:5fv1g3F3epgi4U1
>>> @mid.individual.net:
>>>
>>>> Yesterday's winners:
>>>>
>>>> thread:
>>>> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>>>>
>>>> individual:
>>>> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
>>>> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
>>>> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>>>
>>> At least one of the delusional duo seems to be having some
>>> difficulty understanding the separate categories, "thread" and
>>> "individual".
>>
>> These are the stats so far this month: Susan is hogging her share
>> with 9200+ posts. I'm getting mine.
>>
>> This month
>> 467 bearbotto...@gmai.com
>> 379 hummingb...@2die4.com
>> 326 franks...@nomail.com
>
> That's getting a bit high. Heh! After all I don't have a website to
> advertise so I don't need to be posting quite as frequently as I do.
Yah, I think the 9200+(or even -) is a bit high also. Where oh where is
he getting HIS numbers from?
Susan Bugher
> Yah, I think the 9200+(or even -) is a bit high also. Where oh where is
> he getting HIS numbers from?
Google
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/about
Bear Bottoms
> In <news:5fvh9cF...@mid.individual.net>,
> hummingbird <hummi...@2die4.com> wrote:
>
>>> He's confused again; he didn't realize or pretended not to realize
>>> that the thread award and the individual awards were separate.
>
>> ...she listed one thread
>
> Only one thread won the "thread award".
>
>> but gave a count for *all* threads.
>
> Each individual who won an award had all his posts counted,
> which had nothing to do with the "thread award".
>
>> Must be time you called this another *conspiracy theory*.
>
> I can't say whether your confusion over the post counts is due to your
> theory that there's a cult at work here or not.
>
I still maintain you need to change you handle to dIsInGeNuOuS. The
context of Susan's post was very misleading. Get over it. The fact that
you can't step forward with some integrity regarding such a simple and
obvious thing as this, creates the catalyst to downgrade your worthiness
of contribution a lot. A simple mouthpiece for the cult is all you are.
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
Aren't we a cute little bunch here all rolled up in one little bed
together. I wonder why some people, I'm not sure who, claim there is a
gang about.
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
By your logic...no one works for any person...they work for a company
name. At least the gang is all here. You can sure put out some weird shit
jon.
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
4525 sebug...@yahoo.com
4731 whoisebug...@kvi.net
I added those two together, though I can't be sure whoisebug is her or
not. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. I would venture to say 4731 is rather a
low count for a point person.
Mister Charlie
"Kat Mandu" <Ma...@isp.ne> wrote in message
news:469a999c$0$97229$892e...@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
Hey! I'm an 'other'! Yay...see how easy it is?
I could have been up high in the list if I kept playing the trolls game but
I stopped...no credit to me, I am notorious for playing troll's games and
getting my buttons pushed, so I am -not- bragging, just trying to make a
point that really is obvious to all here. Don't feed the idiots. It really
IS that simple.
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
> Hey! I'm an 'other'! Yay...see how easy it is?
> I could have been up high in the list if I kept playing the trolls game
> but
> I stopped...no credit to me, I am notorious for playing troll's games and
> getting my buttons pushed, so I am -not- bragging, just trying to make a
> point that really is obvious to all here. Don't feed the idiots. It
> really
> IS that simple.
I agree. It would be a wonderful thing for all of the Pricelessware gang
to killfile me. Please do.
wasbit
Ra, Ra, Ra,
We love Susan, we love Susan,
Ra, Ra, Ra.
No poll needed
Kat Mandu
OTOH, being an "other" *might* indicate a sluggish interest in the topic
of freeware and consequent lack of contribution to the newsgroup, not
that I'm suggesting, in your particular case . . . ;-) :-)
elaich
@mid.individual.net:
> You need lessons in reading comprehension.
You need to stop feeding trolls and "the war" if you are retain any respect
in this newsgroup. I'm about 2 more posts away from killfiling you, along
with Bottoms and hummingbird. You seem to love to keep the pot stirred.
--
A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of the message.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
iNcReDuLoUs
> Susan Bugher <sebu...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:5fvcqgF3dbkbfU1
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>> You need lessons in reading comprehension.
>
> You need to stop feeding trolls and "the war" if you are retain any
> respect in this newsgroup. I'm about 2 more posts away from killfiling
> you, along with Bottoms and hummingbird. You seem to love to keep the
> pot stirred.
So, in your opinion, she should just roll over and accept any and all
criticism that hummingbottoms have to offer?
Susan exhibits incomparable restraint, especially wrt those two at the
very least.
Btw, jon, whom Susan was responding to yet you didn't quote, is no troll.
You should "killfile" any and all posters you find annoying and/or
offensive. Everyone will thank you.
--
I lurk, therefore I am. If I post, I am iNcReDuLoUs.
John Corliss
I'm not even on the list! See what going on a road trip will do for you?
--
John Corliss BS206. I don't reply to trolls like Andy Mabbett, Bear
Bottoms, Hummingbird or proteanthread. I also don't reply to people who
whine like Roger Johansson.
Due to all the spam coming from that service, I use NFilter to
filter out all posts from Google Groups.
No ad, cd, commercial, cripple, demo, NAGWARE, share, spy, time-limited,
trial or web wares or warez for me, please.
Susan Bugher
> You need to stop feeding trolls and "the war" <SNIP>
I'm working on it. Not doing too well ATM, 16 posts (before this one)
today and only 5 of them were on topic.
You seem to love to keep the pot stirred.
That's not true. "Catch 22" -> Should I answer your post or let the
allegation stand without a denial? Is this post going to be included in
your tally of my sins of commission.?
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
> Susan exhibits incomparable restraint, especially wrt those two at the
> very least.
Give me a break. She is the main cause of it all.
Bear Bottoms
wrote:
> elaich wrote:
>
>> You need to stop feeding trolls and "the war" <SNIP>
>
> I'm working on it. Not doing too well ATM, 16 posts (before this one)
> today and only 5 of them were on topic.
>
> You seem to love to keep the pot stirred.
>
> That's not true. "Catch 22" -> Should I answer your post or let the
> allegation stand without a denial? Is this post going to be included in
> your tally of my sins of commission.?
>
> Susan
LOL....and admission and at the same time a denial. Unbelievable.
jon
Susan Bugher wrote:
>That's not true. "Catch 22" -> Should I answer your post or let the
>allegation stand without a denial? Is this post going to be included in
>your tally of my sins of commission.?
Have you stopped beating your lesbian lover?
Bear Bottoms
> In <news:op.tvi931p9jo4m88@bwwlxc1>,
> "Bear Bottoms" <bearbo...@gmai.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:05:30 -0500, iNcReDuLoUs
>> <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Susan exhibits incomparable restraint, especially wrt those two at
>>> the very least.
>>
>> Give me a break. She is the main cause of it all.
>
> You're on pace to post well over a thousand articles to a.c.f this
> month; it's your send button, not under Susan's control.
>
Like I said....where this stops is up to the gang.
Mister Charlie
That's actually true and not true in my case. I read multiple times a day,
so it is not a lack of interest about freeware. As to my contributing, I do
when I have something to offer but most regulars here have far more
resources and ideas about better programs than I have, and are quicker to
the draw. When you have maybe a dozen full sites of excellent freeware
linked here constantly there is little I can offer.
If I had more to contribute than the occasional slap upside a troll's head I
would.
steve sonsino
LEAVE THIS GROUP YOU ARE NOT WANTED HERE!
"Susan Bugher" <sebu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5fv1g3F...@mid.individual.net...
> Yesterday's winners:
>
> thread:
> "The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>
> individual:
> the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
> 1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
> 2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>
> Susan
> --
> Posted to alt.comp.freeware
> Search alt.comp.freeware (or read it online):
> http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?q=+group:alt.comp.freeware
> Pricelessware & ACF: http://www.pricelesswarehome.org
> Pricelessware: http://www.pricelessware.org (not maintained)
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Susan Bugher
That too.
Reminds me even more of the rules for the "War on Terror".
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/06/librarians-desc.html
"Librarians Describe Life Under An FBI Gag Order"
HowSomeEver. . .
I will continue to post the ***occasional*** reminder that this is NOT a
war, it's just a couple of trolls making a lot of noise and telling a
lot of lies.
Lew/+Silat
> jon wrote:
>> Susan Bugher wrote:
>
>>> That's not true. "Catch 22" -> Should I answer your post or let the
>>> allegation stand without a denial? Is this post going to be included in
>>> your tally of my sins of commission.?
>
>> Have you stopped beating your lesbian lover?
>
> That too.
>
> Reminds me even more of the rules for the "War on Terror".
> http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/06/librarians-desc.html
> "Librarians Describe Life Under An FBI Gag Order"
>
> HowSomeEver. . .
>
> I will continue to post the ***occasional*** reminder that this is NOT a
> war, it's just a couple of trolls making a lot of noise and telling a
> lot of lies.
>
> Susan
Susan please! That just gives trolls a bad name:) And we dont even know if its BB posting or his large
children:)
--
Lew/+Silat
Kat Mandu
Gotcha. Natch.
Duddits
wrote:
>Yesterday's winners:
>
>thread:
>"The war" (100 posts) (32 additional post so far today)
>
>individual:
>the winner: Bear Bottoms (51 posts)
>1st runner-up: Hummingbird (36 posts)
>2nd runner-up: Franklin (25 posts)
>
>Susan
Damn Susan. When are you gonna killfile these 3 and quit playing
their game. Jeez............
Only trolls reply to trolls
Dud
Thip
"Duddits" <Dud...@Dreamcatcher.net> wrote in message
news:bqrl93t8v764ddpsr...@4ax.com...
>
> Damn Susan. When are you gonna killfile these 3 and quit playing
> their game. Jeez............
> Only trolls reply to trolls
>
> Dud
AMEN!!!