Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: DocFetcher desktop search program

159 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Bear

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 9:24:45 PM11/12/12
to
Yrrah <Yrra...@acf.invalid> wrote in
news:e173a8p5bvg8o5le9...@net.com:

> FYI only. I haven't used this program.
>
> "DocFetcher is an Open Source desktop search application: It allows
> you to search the contents of files on your computer.
> DocFetcher requires that you create so-called indexes for the folders
> you want to search in."
> "There is a portable version of DocFetcher that runs on Windows, Linux
> and Mac OS X."
>
> Supported Document Formats:
> Microsoft Office (doc, xls, ppt)
> Microsoft Office 2007 and newer (docx, xlsx, pptx, docm, xlsm, pptm)
> Microsoft Outlook (pst)
> OpenOffice.org (odt, ods, odg, odp, ott, ots, otg, otp)
> Portable Document Format (pdf)
> HTML (html, xhtml, ...)
> Plain text (customizable)
> Rich Text Format (rtf)
> AbiWord (abw, abw.gz, zabw)
> Microsoft Compiled HTML Help (chm)
> Microsoft Visio (vsd)
> Scalable Vector Graphics (svg).
>
> Home:
> http://docfetcher.sourceforge.net/en/index.html
>
> Interesting list of features. Unfortunately it's a Java application.
> I am not aware of a free search program which supports all these
> formats. Currently I use AgentRansack, which certainly doesn't support
> as many formats (can search in pdf files though).
>
> Yrrah

http://www.indexyourfiles.com/

http://www.easexp.com/xsearch/

--
Bear
http://bearware.info
Header Path: news.sunsite.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!
news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail

Grandfather Bishma

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 9:29:12 PM11/12/12
to
Quit lying about Doc Fetcher Bear!

californ...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 9:45:23 PM11/12/12
to

> I am not aware of a free search program which supports all these
>
> formats. Currently I use Agent Ransack, which certainly doesn't support
>
> as many formats (can search in pdf files though).

Agent Ransack and DocFetcher are not really a good comparison. DocFetcher is designed to search through your documents and find what you looking for inside those documents.

Agent Ransack will find things in your pdf documents but document search is not what it is designed for.

A more relevant comparison would be Info rapid Search and Replace or Wilma desktop search.


Message has been deleted

F. Reeware

unread,
Nov 14, 2012, 8:20:55 PM11/14/12
to
> http://www.indexyourfiles.com/
>
> http://www.easexp.com/xsearch/

How wrong you are, Mr Bottoms. Read the OP's post again and do your
research before you reply. Can these two programs search for text
strings in [all] these file types:

> > Microsoft Office (doc, xls, ppt)
> > Microsoft Office 2007 and newer (docx, xlsx, pptx, docm, xlsm, pptm)
> > Microsoft Outlook (pst)
> > OpenOffice.org (odt, ods, odg, odp, ott, ots, otg, otp)
> > Portable Document Format (pdf)
> > HTML (html, xhtml, ...)
> > Plain text (customizable)
> > Rich Text Format (rtf)
> > AbiWord (abw, abw.gz, zabw)
> > Microsoft Compiled HTML Help (chm)
> > Microsoft Visio (vsd)
> > Scalable Vector Graphics (svg).

No, Mr Bottoms, they can't.
Mr Bottoms, you are a failure.

F. Reeware

Flasherly

unread,
Nov 15, 2012, 7:00:04 AM11/15/12
to
On Nov 13, 10:58 am, Yrrah <Yrrah-...@acf.invalid> wrote:
>
> Well, go ahead, compare.
>
> Yrrah

I render much into ASCII for indexing purposes within a search engine
effectively then rendering results from a database. Its form
originates from telephone companies and early retrieval methods over
regional listings for instantaneous voice print services. All aside
bananas and passion fruit, GREP or ASCII *nix ports, or Gibbons
volumes in HTML and pixelated musical scores originally dating from
the Renaissance. Everyone, though, is truly searching according to
scientifically conducted survey results in establishing what
activities most occupy people on a computer. From ages predating
them, I'm sure it's so much better to know at least that is
established now.

Why Tea

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 4:52:08 AM11/17/12
to
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 13:05:14 UTC+11, Yrrah wrote:
> > I am not aware of a free search program which supports all these
>
> > formats.
>
>
>
> Should be: ...another free search program...
>
>
>
> Yrrah

Win7 comes with fairly good index/search capability.
It virtually makes many search programs obsolete.

Poutnik

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 5:10:16 AM11/17/12
to

Why Tea from ytl...@gmail.com
posted Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:52:08 -0800 (PST)


>
> Win7 comes with fairly good index/search capability.
> It virtually makes many search programs obsolete.

Unless it indexes files that Win7 does not.
Or if computer does not run Windows.

--
Poutnik

Current way of spaced quoting by GoogleGroups is disaster,
if combined with no quoting by some GG users.

Poutnik

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 5:22:01 AM11/17/12
to

Poutnik from pou...@privacy.invalid
posted Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:10:16 +0100


>
> Why Tea from ytl...@gmail.com
> posted Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:52:08 -0800 (PST)
>
>
> >
> > Win7 comes with fairly good index/search capability.
> > It virtually makes many search programs obsolete.
>
> Unless it indexes files that Win7 does not.
> Or if computer does not run Windows.

E.g. not sure if on Win7 , but Vista search
does not index context of ODx doc groups.
Message has been deleted

Anthony Smith

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 11:27:14 AM11/17/12
to
On Saturday, November 17, 2012 3:08:25 PM UTC, Yrrah wrote:
> Why Tea <ytl...@gmail.com>:
>
> DocFetcher in terms of capabilities (but which does not require Java
>
> or. NET). The nearest thing is still AgentRansack afaik. No one here
>
> has mentioned a better one.
>
>
>
> Yrrah

Everything Search Engine http://www.voidtools.com/

Now they have.

Poutnik

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 11:29:15 AM11/17/12
to

Anthony Smith from tony.in...@gmail.com
posted Sat, 17 Nov 2012 08:27:14 -0800 (PST)
It is not indexing content.
Message has been deleted

Anthony Smith

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 12:01:30 PM11/17/12
to
On Saturday, November 17, 2012 4:52:17 PM UTC, Yrrah wrote:
> Anthony Smith <tony.in...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> > Everything Search Engine http://www.voidtools.com/
>
>
>
> Nonsense.
>
>
>
> "1.3 Does Everything search file contents?
>
> No, "Everything" does not search file contents, only file and folder
>
> names."
>
>
>
> Please read before you reply or don't bother at all.
I won't bother, asshole.

Bear

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 12:16:21 PM11/17/12
to
Poutnik <pou...@privacy.invalid> wrote in news:MPG.2b1180f2a21d412bb20
@news.eternal-september.org:

>
> Why Tea from ytl...@gmail.com
> posted Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:52:08 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>>
>> Win7 comes with fairly good index/search capability.
>> It virtually makes many search programs obsolete.
>
> Unless it indexes files that Win7 does not.
> Or if computer does not run Windows.
>

Have you tried UltraSearch? It's fast! :)

http://www.jam-software.com/ultrasearch/

Jax
--
Bear Bottoms
http://bearware.info

Poutnik

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 12:29:55 PM11/17/12
to

Bear from removebea...@gmail.com
posted Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:16:21 GMT
Seems comparable to EveryThing.

I usually use Cathy with background cathycmd file indexing,
it is indexing and searching really fast.

Latest non public 2.30 version does not have folder item limit
and skipped reparse points.

For content seatching I occationally use Vista Windows search.
DocFetcher sounds promising, not yet tried.

Bear

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 1:50:44 PM11/17/12
to
Poutnik <pou...@privacy.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.2b11e7f...@news.eternal-september.org:

>
> Bear from removebea...@gmail.com
> posted Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:16:21 GMT
>
>
>>
>> Poutnik <pou...@privacy.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.2b1180f2a21d412bb20
>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>> >
>> > Why Tea from ytl...@gmail.com
>> > posted Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:52:08 -0800 (PST)
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Win7 comes with fairly good index/search capability.
>> >> It virtually makes many search programs obsolete.
>> >
>> > Unless it indexes files that Win7 does not.
>> > Or if computer does not run Windows.
>> >
>>
>> Have you tried UltraSearch? It's fast! :)
>>
>> http://www.jam-software.com/ultrasearch/
>>
>> Jax
>
> Seems comparable to EveryThing.
>
> I usually use Cathy with background cathycmd file indexing,
> it is indexing and searching really fast.
>
> Latest non public 2.30 version does not have folder item limit
> and skipped reparse points.
>
> For content seatching I occationally use Vista Windows search.
> DocFetcher sounds promising, not yet tried.
>

I use Everything - plenty good enough for me. Jax doesn't exist as who
she is claimed to be....and you are replying to Pooh...the remove bear.

Poutnik

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 2:15:09 PM11/17/12
to

Bear from bearbo...@gmai.com
posted 17 Nov 2012 18:50:44 GMT


> I use Everything - plenty good enough for me.

But it does not work for network disks and offline volumes, AFAIK.

Bear

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 2:51:55 PM11/17/12
to
Poutnik <pou...@privacy.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.2b1200a...@news.eternal-september.org:

>
> Bear from bearbo...@gmai.com
> posted 17 Nov 2012 18:50:44 GMT
>
>
>> I use Everything - plenty good enough for me.
>
> But it does not work for network disks and offline volumes, AFAIK.
>
>

No it doesn't though it does pick up my external drives and usb flash
drives...anything connected to USB ports.

If I need network support I use:
http://www.indexyourfiles.com/

others I list and use are:
http://swish-e.org/
http://www.easexp.com/xsearch/

p-0'0-h the cat

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 2:58:25 PM11/17/12
to
On 17 Nov 2012 18:50:44 GMT, Bear <bearbo...@gmai.com> wrote:

>Jax doesn't exist as who she is claimed to be....
>and you are replying to Pooh...the remove bear.

I am replying to the liar Bear bearbo...@gmai.com who has the header
reading skills of a Turnip.

--
p-0.0-h the cat
Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme

Taking a break from John Corliss

Gordon Darling

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 3:04:54 PM11/17/12
to
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:58:25 +0000, p-0'0-h the cat wrote:

> On 17 Nov 2012 18:50:44 GMT, Bear <bearbo...@gmai.com> wrote:
>
>>Jax doesn't exist as who she is claimed to be....
>>and you are replying to Pooh...the remove bear.
>
> I am replying to the liar Bear bearbo...@gmai.com who has the header
> reading skills of a Turnip.

That's insulting! To turnips.
Message has been deleted

Bear

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 4:33:07 PM11/17/12
to
Yrrah <Yrra...@acf.invalid> wrote in
news:f0tfa8hpp7hvo2a67...@net.com:

> Gordon Darling <m...@privacy.net>:
>
>> > I am replying to the liar Bear bearbo...@gmai.com who has the
>> > header reading skills of a Turnip.
>
>> That's insulting! To turnips.
>
> Never insult turnips or else Big Haggis and his Tatties wil come after
> you.
>
> Yrrah
>
>

Ah, lookie whose here...Pooh, Gordon and Yrrah. My my.

Gordon Darling

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 5:39:14 PM11/17/12
to
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:35:44 +0100, Yrrah wrote:

> Gordon Darling <m...@privacy.net>:
>
>> > I am replying to the liar Bear bearbo...@gmai.com who has the
>> > header reading skills of a Turnip.
>
>> That's insulting! To turnips.
>
> Never insult turnips or else Big Haggis and his Tatties will come after
> you.

And the Neeps. Don't forget the Neeps!

Cyril of Alexandria

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 11:00:42 PM11/17/12
to
Bear, BUSTED!! You argue with cats, you get busted.
Bear, you cannot get in a lie edgewise, I am persistent, and you are:
D.O.A. BTW, WHORE soap.
Haby

0 new messages