I've got this awesome OC-768 connection between my homes. Is there a way I
can capture the Louisiana warmth in Baton Rouge and transmit it up my line
to Halstead, south east of London?
It's dang cold there and people are people are being buried in torrential
snowdrifts.
--
Bear Bottoms
Freeware website: http://bearware.info
If you want the other kind of snow, ask me.
> I've got this awesome OC-768 connection between my homes. Is there a way I
> can capture the Louisiana warmth in Baton Rouge and transmit it up my line
> to Halstead, south east of London?
It would help but Halstead is NE of London:-(
We're only getting the crap the US east coast has dumped on us. Usual
old weather pattern.
> On 06/01/2010 14:44, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>> Hummy says they're hiding bodies in deep snowdrifts in the U.K. They
>> need my help.
>>
>> I've got this awesome OC-768 connection between my homes. Is there a
>> way I can capture the Louisiana warmth in Baton Rouge and transmit it
>> up my line to Halstead, south east of London?
>>
>> It's dang cold there and people are people are being buried in
>> torrential snowdrifts.
>>
>
> It would help but Halstead is NE of London:-(
Whistleblower said scouringerer Stubbo lives in Halstead, U.K. (South East
of London).
Whistleblower ecrit:
>
> That IP belongs to NTL Cable in the U.K.:
>
> http://preview.xrl.in/45sp
>
> and is located in Halstead,
> U.K. (South East of London):
>
> http://preview.xrl.in/45sm
<07a0cd65a193caa4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<dd3da1a667ad6bc0...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<1c92464501ec8c57...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
He wrote that three times, thusly you are wrong wrong wrong. LOL. You can't
fool me. Whistleblower is reliable. He has posted important information for
Hummy and Hummy always thanks Whistleblower in his sig.
> We're only getting the crap the US east coast has dumped on us. Usual
> old weather pattern.
How do you know? Do you live in Halstead?
That must be why Halstead make crap boilers - they don't know where the
..... they are or what they're doing!
--
Fred
> How do you know? Do you live in Halstead?
Not far away.
> That must be why Halstead make crap boilers - they don't know where the
> ..... they are or what they're doing!
Are you talking wives or boilers?
> Someone forging as: 'Bear Bottoms' wrote thus:
>
>> Whistleblower said scouringerer Stubbo lives in Halstead, U.K. (South
>> East of London).
>
> No he didn't. Get it right.
Excuse me. I am confused Hummer because I quoted Whistleblower. He
wrote..."That IP belongs to NTL Cable in the U.K. and is located in
Halstead, U.K. (South East of London)".
He said Stubbo lives in Halstead, U.K. (South East of London).
Whistleblower posts.
<07a0cd65a193caa4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<dd3da1a667ad6bc0...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<1c92464501ec8c57...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
> I've just checked and a snapshot of what an IP locator produced for
> Stubbo's IP Address was posted. IP locator's are usually right but
> sometimes get it wrong. In this case, it's approximately right because
> Stubbo does live in Essex or Kent near to east/south east London. Is
> it Halstead/Essex or Halstead/Kent? who knows/who cares.
It doesn't matter where those poor people are secretly buried in snow
drifts by U.K. government agents. Is there a way I can capture this
Louisiana warmth here in Baton Rouge and transmit it up through my
awesome OC-768 connection to help the English people in Halstead?
Wherever it is.
> Stubbo's IP Address is connected to the NTL Internet node here:
> 82.5.94.219 = [ cpc1-seve5-0-0-cust730.popl.cable.ntl.com ] The
> significant bit is "popl" which might be 'Poplar' which is in East
> London. "popl" is the NTL connection node covering where Stubbo exists
> and where he gets NTL cable TV/Internet from. I've no idea what TV
> channels he is signed up for ;-) Indeed, this is the link showing the
> IP locator output: http://preview.xrl.in/45sm
You shouldn't be watching television. This is an emergency.
> On 06/01/2010 15:39, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>
>> How do you know? Do you live in Halstead?
>
> Not far away.
Are you Stubbo?
>>Whistleblower said scouringerer Stubbo lives in Halstead, U.K. (South East
>>of London).
>
> No he didn't. Get it right.
Yes you did.
> I've just checked and a snapshot of what an IP locator produced
> for Stubbo's IP Address was posted.
It's not my IP.
> IP locator's are usually right
IP locators are rarely right.
> but sometimes get it wrong.
Most times.
> In this case, it's approximately right
> because Stubbo does live in Essex or Kent near to east/south east
> London.
This is too funny Essex and Kent are nowhere near each other. One's North
of London, the other is South of London.
> Is it Halstead/Essex or Halstead/Kent? who knows/who
> cares.
It's neither.
> Stubbo's IP Address is connected to the NTL Internet node here:
>
>>82.5.94.219 = [ cpc1-seve5-0-0-cust730.popl.cable.ntl.com ]
It's not my IP and I'm not on NTL.
> The significant bit is "popl" which might be 'Poplar' which is in
> East London. "popl" is the NTL connection node covering where
> Stubbo exists and where he gets NTL cable TV/Internet from.
> I've no idea what TV channels he is signed up for ;-)
I don't have cable TV. I'm not signed up for any TV channels. I rarely
watch TV. I like DVD's though.
> Indeed, this is the link showing the IP locator output:
>> http://preview.xrl.in/45sm
... are you still harvesting IP's? <sigh> You're NOT very good at the
analysis of them are you hummingbird <VBG> BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
--
Pooh the Cat
I get confused trying to understand your confusion.
>> I quoted Whistleblower. He wrote..."That IP belongs to NTL Cable in
>> the U.K. and is located in Halstead, U.K. (South East of London)".
>
> So what if he did? I post what I want when I use the nym Whistleblower.
OMG, you're Whistleblower! So that's how you know what he was thinking.
>> He said Stubbo lives in Halstead, U.K. (South East of London).
>
> Yes, sort of, he said it but not quite.
Hummer, you are scouringering me. Check the links.
<07a0cd65a193caa4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<dd3da1a667ad6bc0...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<1c92464501ec8c57...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
>>> Excuse me. I am confused Hummer
>>
>> I get confused about which Halstead.
>
> I get confused trying to understand your confusion.
>
>>> I quoted Whistleblower. He wrote..."That IP belongs to NTL Cable in
>>> the U.K. and is located in Halstead, U.K. (South East of London)".
>>
>> So what if he did? I post what I want when I use the nym Whistleblower.
>
> OMG, you're Whistleblower!
*FORGERY*
Attempted denigration by Stubbings, pathetic even for a Cultist. Fast in
retreat.
--
Bear Bottoms-Freeware Researcher Extraordinaire
Freeware website: http://bearware.info
> It's not my IP and I'm not on NTL.
do you protesteth 2 much? grow up.
Ha. You are too funny.
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:44:27 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>
>>>> Excuse me. I am confused Hummer
>>>
>>> I get confused about which Halstead.
>>
>> I get confused trying to understand your confusion.
>>
>>>> I quoted Whistleblower. He wrote..."That IP belongs to NTL Cable in
>>>> the U.K. and is located in Halstead, U.K. (South East of London)".
>>>
>>> So what if he did? I post what I want when I use the nym Whistleblower.
>>
>> OMG, you're Whistleblower!
>
> *FORGERY*
>
> Attempted denigration by Stubbings, pathetic even for a Cultist. Fast in
> retreat.
Nice diversion Ari. But back to hummingbird's denial of whistleblowhard's
posts
<07a0cd65a193caa4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<dd3da1a667ad6bc0...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<1c92464501ec8c57...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
Hummingbird is lying again. <feigned shock>
Nothing he /ever/ says stands up to even cursory examination.
Even a lobotomised monkey would find it difficult to believe a word uttered
by the hummingturd.
This is /hard/ evidence hummingbird!!! Have you /any/? about anything you
allege?, you low life, lying retard, scumbag.
--
de KAT
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:06:16 -0500, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:44:27 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>>>>> Excuse me. I am confused Hummer
>>>>
>>>> I get confused about which Halstead.
>>>
>>> I get confused trying to understand your confusion.
>>>
>>>>> I quoted Whistleblower. He wrote..."That IP belongs to NTL Cable in
>>>>> the U.K. and is located in Halstead, U.K. (South East of London)".
>>>>
>>>> So what if he did? I post what I want when I use the nym Whistleblower.
>>>
>>> OMG, you're Whistleblower!
>>
>> *FORGERY*
>>
>> Attempted denigration by Stubbings, pathetic even for a Cultist. Fast in
>> retreat.
>
> Nice diversion Ari.
*FORGERY*
More Stubbings denigration. Name calling and such. Hummer must be really
getting to him.
LOL
> Hummer must be really getting to him.
Doubtful, he's got the wrong address.
LOL.
...and let's not forget whistleblowsoutofhisarse's declarations that
Halstead was in South East London. So funny.
<07a0cd65a193caa4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<dd3da1a667ad6bc0...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<1c92464501ec8c57...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
Spot the IQ.
--
da KAT
> 'Guillaume Le Stubb' wrote thus:
>
>>"Spot the IQ."
>
>
> It difficult. Your IQ is no bigger than a boot size.
Wrong again.
It seems like a habit you don't have the ability to break :)
Thicko.
Any comment on your denial of whistleblowhard's posts re the location of
Halstead in South East London?
For the record, here they are
<07a0cd65a193caa4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<dd3da1a667ad6bc0...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<1c92464501ec8c57...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
Slam Dunk. Punk.
--
da KAT
I deny everything. That cockup about location is nothing to do with
me. When that was posted I was in Minnesota stalking Franklin. I mean,
defending myself from a predicted attack.
I can't post at the moment because right now I'm in an Airbus A340
flying back to the UK after aborting my Franko-mission. That's right,
I can't post right now. So I'm not posting this. Ha ha ha! That's got
you confused hasn't it? That's so typically clever of me.
It's been a good week for me. I even fooled you into thinking I knew
your IP.
You must be mentally psychotic if you think you can outwit me. I've
got you worked out. You can't fool me. You live near a town beginning
with "L". I bet that scared you.
I know all about you. I know you have had snow. See, I'm onto you.
hb
--
·ACF.FAQ download: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-d375213f.html
·ACF <zero tolerance> policy: http://zer0tolerance.notlong.com
·$Pricelessware $Racket: http://qdeo.com/uw7 (courtesy whistleblower)
·John Stubbings sock list: http://preview.xrl.in/3zis
"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident"
You only have to prove that is my IP.
Just prove it, and �1000 is yours!
Anyone prove it, and �1000 is theirs.
My money is safe hummy!
Have you /any/ hard evidence? Any at all?
No. Surprise! Ha!
... Quite funny really is it not? that just another bullshit talking point
for you has blown up into complete humiliation. You're dug in so deep you
can't get out.
So funny, you /know/ it's not my IP. I know /you/ know it's not my IP.
BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
--
de KAT
You are sooooo desperate to get me to defend myself, but I have nothing to
defend hummy, and /everyone/ can see that.
You're the one on the defensive, with nowhere to go. Too funny.
Just prove that is my IP.
Quite a few people /know/ my IP hummy...
They're loving watching you squirm....
Ha! Ha! He! He!... Twat.
--
le kAT
> Let's try a THIRD time to get Stubbings to focus on the facts
OK, 82.5.94.219 is not my IP address.
Neither do I have any knowledge of who uses the IP address 82.5.94.219 you
keep quoting.
It's pure fantasy on your part, just like all the other tripe you keep
spouting.
You're embarrassing yourself. Please continue.
For someone who professes disinterest in other peoples IP addresses, you
seem to have a very unhealthy interest in mine.
Perhaps people will now judge for themselves the warnings about you
collecting IP addresses in the light of this very strange campaign.
HTH ;)
--
da kAT
> "John Stubbings" posting today as: 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>
>>On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:57:53 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
>>
>>> Let's try a THIRD time to get Stubbings to focus on the facts
>>
>>OK, 82.5.94.219 is not my IP address.
>
> liar.
>
> Your bluster comes nowhere near to offering an explanation of how
> YOUR IP appeared in the Path headers of a bunch of forgeries.
It's NOT MY IP... so how can I offer an explanation?
To clear this matter up, just prove it is my IP. Then you win. Easy.
... but you can't do that hummingbird, therefore your words are grass,
straw man.
No surprise to anyone with just one eye open. You are throwing far to much
mud in the hope some sticks, but you are throwing it at the wrong address.
LOL
It must be tiring for you.
HTH.
--
Le Stubb
> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>You are sooooo desperate to get me to defend myself, but I have nothing
>>to defend hummy, and /everyone/ can see that.
>
> I am simply offering YOU the opportunity to put forth an
> explanation for what happened.
Hummer, why be you so industrially inquisitorialing and so forth? 'Tis not
prudent to consort with Kool Aid scouringerers. Thusly if your need to know
about drive by headers, so be it, ask me or check my web site.
LOL. It must be tiring unto you. Give me back my muchly headers.
> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>>"OK, 82.5.94.219 is not my IP address."
>
>>> liar.
>>>
>>> Your bluster comes nowhere near to offering an explanation of how
>>> YOUR IP appeared in the Path headers of a bunch of forgeries.
>
>
>>It's NOT MY IP... so how can I offer an explanation?
>
> Yes it is,
Then post the proof. You have none of course. How stupid.
> and offering an explanation is unrelated to it being
> your IP. Two separate issues. You dig?
>
> It's not one of my IP's either but I could offer several
> explanations, as I previously said. Problem is they are all highly
> improbable.
>
> Since you are a self proclaimed world expert on all matters
> technical, economic and political (when you're not being run off
> ukpm for expressing them. hahaha), it should be even easier for
> you :) Right?
> Surely a genius such as you, can understand that. Right?
I'm not interested in developing a hypothesis based on unsound data. I'll
leave that to cheap shot tory political wannbe no hopers like you.
In the real world I make things work. I wouldn't play that game there, and
I have no interest in doing that here.
You dig?
> But you bluster and stamp your feet in feigned anger. Why?
>
> Why yes - because you know there is no plausible explanation.
> Ergo, you posted the forgeries, and they are just a few of the
> countless forgeries/socks you've posted on ACF going back 18
> months: Ms Lucile Bryant and "we are the hummingbirds".
You wouldn't get a doctorate in logical thought practices with that heap of
bull. They'd laugh you off the campus... tiny, tiny mind.
You let your stupid ego latch onto the first crackpot theory your simple
mind could dream up. You published the idiocy without applying any rigorous
examination to some simple facts, and now you look like the lightweight you
truly are.
--
da KAT
> I am simply offering YOU the opportunity to put forth an
> explanation for what happened.
What happened is...... you're a fucking MORON. You haven't a single
fucking CLUE what Stubby's IP address is, let ALONE how a Path:
header is constructed.
Free Clue-By-Four: The ONLY piece of a Path: header that's reliable
is the very last. The rest is trivial to forge.
Oh, and by the way shitforbrains...... they're backwards.
> 'Anonymous Remailer (austria)' (probably John Stubbings)
Only probably? Anyway it wasn't.
> wrote thus:
>
>
> OK 'Anonymous Remailer' asswipe. Let's give you the floor:
>
> I have asked Stubbo SIX times to put forth a plausible explanation
> as to HOW his IP Address (and it IS his IP Address)
How can I answer that question? It's not my IP address.
> ended up in
> the Path Header of a bunch of forgeries in the name of someone
> HE has been running a vendetta against for almost one year.
> Coincidence?
>
> He - or anybody else - can do this without admitting liability,
> but he's chosen not to do so. Instead he is conducting a massive
> bluster/bluff/smear campaign; so far he's posted about 10-15
> smear threads to divert attention. Coincidence?
I not trying to divert attention. I'm trying to /get/ attention, in order
to humiliate you. Quite successfully according to my fan mail...
> Contrary to your false comment above, I am well aware that the
> Path header can be tweaked, perhaps even fully forged, but that
> is difficult if not impossible for the average Joe. I certainly do
> not know how to do it. You claim "it is trivial to forge". Really?
>
> Go ahead and explain it...please avoid bluster.
Are you talking to me or the poster, I'm confused. If you want to learn to
forge the Path, go work it out. I expect I could temporarily, but the
admins would bust it soon enough. I have zero interest in nntp, anyway.
Show me the money :)
> So here you go:
> EVEN IF the IP was added by a forger, HOW and WHY did they
> choose Stubbings's IP? Is it likely that other people on ACF
> know his IP? Perhaps 1-2 Pricelessware cultists who he has private
> e-mail contact with to plot tactics know it, that's all. There are
> millions of IP Addresses in the world - why choose HIS?
> Coincidence?
It's not my IP. All you are demonstrating here is the ability to present a
completely incoherent, illogical, [and I hesitate to call it such]
argument, which you have based on an incorrect supposition.
I'm gobsmacked at your breathtaking ineptitude.
> There ARE several explanations to this but ISTM that each one
> is highly improbable as to make it very very unlikely. That leaves
> HIM being the most likely culprit, but I'm open to input...
>
> Also, when I posted to him to warn him about his cock-up, there
> were NO further forgeries with his IP in the Path header.
> Coincidence?
>
> But he then posted some more forgeries with added headers, like:
>>X-MyIPAddress: blah.blah.blah.blah
>
> ...to bluff it out. Chutzpah is Stubbings to a T.
>
> Also, his first response to my post was: "you should have kept
> your trap shut". Since then he has changed his stance to one of
> bluster, bluff, smear and attack. Coincidence?
>
> Also, it is known that Stubbings's ISP is NTL/Virgin UK.
That's not been my ISP for ~10 years. Way before NTL.
> Am I to believe that another ACF regular is also located in the
> same geo-location as him and also uses NTL/Virgin with that IP
> and is a forger? Yeah right. Coincidence?
>
> Also, since he arrived on ACF he's used countless socks/forgeries
> and is a proven liar/bluffer/bullshitter.
Surely the burden of proof lies with the accuser. Can you /prove/ that is
my IP? No. Therefore, this is all fantasy.
> EG: he flatly denied ever using 40TudeDialog client until I posted
> the MID of a post by HIM dated 24 hours earlier just before he
> forged some posts in another poster's name on another newsgroup!
> To this day he still denies it and bluffs it out. But he now uses
> 40TudeDialog as his main newsclient! Go figure!
>
> There's a lot of coincidences there boyo.
>
> Give it your best shot and don't bluster :-)
OK :-) but I doubt your short circuited brain has the ability to jump out
of the repetitive groove you're stuck in. You've dug yourself in so deep,
and you have no friends left to give you a hand out.
Lightweight you are, lightweight you shall remain.
--
za kAT
> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:24:57 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
>>> OK 'Anonymous Remailer' asswipe. Let's give you the floor:
>>>
>>> I have asked Stubbo SIX times to put forth a plausible explanation
>>> as to HOW his IP Address (and it IS his IP Address)
>>
>>How can I answer that question? It's not my IP address.
>
> Liar.
> Your bluster/bluff is becoming tiresome, Stubbings.
There is no bluff, neither do you have any proof to prove otherwise.
> You won't answer the questions asked of you nor will you take it
> to e-mail because you're a cowardly scared cat who forges.
> That's a proven FACT.
Then /prove/ it, and stop repeating yourself.
Just /prove/ it hummy.
Your words are grass, straw man.
--
za kAT
>
> 'Anonymous Remailer (austria)' (probably John Stubbings)
> wrote thus:
You and Stubbings are like two pathetic Twinkies. More alike than
you are different. You're so infatuated with each other you see
each other everywhere. Another Pangborn/Moore love affair if ever
there was one.
*laugh*
How does it feel to BE the thing you dislike so much?
> OK 'Anonymous Remailer' asswipe. Let's give you the floor:
>
> I have asked Stubbo SIX times to put forth a plausible explanation
> as to HOW his IP Address (and it IS his IP Address) ended up in
Yeah yeah... you think you have something tangible in your teeth
because you're too stump stupid to know any better. No surprises
here... there's a couple fatal flaws you're completely oblivious to.
1. You still haven't proved your IP theory correct. You can stomp
your little feet and screech "IS TO HIS IP!" all day long, and it
doesn't make fantasy a reality. In fact you personally don't have
enough credibility to even make it a talking point.
2. IP addresses are nearly unheard of in message path headers, and
the one you're anally fixating on absolutely should NOT be there.
It was inserted "artificially". Which, if you had an IQ rivaling
that of a common garden slug, would have lead you to #3...
3. Path headers are probably one of the most trivial to forge. The
only reliable entry is the last. And as much as I'd like to see
your incompetence embarrass you further I'll save time by cluing
you into the fact that they're in reverse order. The first on the
list is the last "hop" the message took. The ones out on the end,
dimbulb... anyone could have inserted.
That last point makes this quibble of yours moderately interesting.
One of the most typical ways to diddle path headers is by running
a local news "server". Like... Hampster, for instance.
<pause for dramatic effect>
Now refresh our memories dimbulb. Who among us both runs Hampster
AND is a known forger and liar? And who is it that's wetting their
Underoos over an obviously manufactured anomaly?
Yes, that's right dimbulb, if you know what the fuck you're talking
about and have just a little knowledge of the players, the most
likely explanation is that YOU YOURSELF are responsible for the
forgeries in question, and your love affair with Stubby drove you to
try and implicate him.
<snip some drivel>
> EVEN IF the IP was added by a forger, HOW and WHY did they
> choose Stubbings's IP?
If it IS Stubby's IP, the how and why of you forging it is obvious.
You detailed it in your own words, in the very post I'm replying to.
If it ISN'T Stubby's IP the how and why is even more obvious. You
have the motive, the knowledge, and the tools. And the IP is wrong,
which given your long and distinguished career as an ACF village
idiot makes the whole thing fir PERFECTLY with your mode of
operation. You're a spiteful little cunt who would wouldn't
hesitate to stoop to any childish little trick, and you fucked it
up as usual.
<rest of your drivel snipped, unread>
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
Good post. You're right to ask Hummingbird "How does it feel to BE the
thing you dislike so much?"
Hummingbird's posts to uk.politics.misc show he can sometimes discuss
things sensibly. The problems occur when his emotions overwhelm him and
then he lies and cheats.
Unfortunately it seems his emotions overwhelm him at the slightest
trigger.
There's little room for logic when Hummingbird starts to use his emotional
reasoning. He becomes unduly suspicious and starts to see imaginary
conspiracies everywhere. He projects his own (disreputable) way of
behaving onto people who would never act in such a manner.
It's all Hummingbird's way of explaining to himself why others are capable
of the malignant actions he has imagined in them.
Of course it sometimes makes him get things hopelessly wrong. When this
happens he uses every new fact he encounters to strengthen his erroneous
understanding. So, any fact which supports his notion is welcomed whereas
any fact which disproves his notion is identified as a cunning lie. He
has no good way to evaluate the points you are try to show him.
His limited insight means Hummingbird welcomes psychological explanations
of why other people are deviant but he never thinks to look at himself in
the mirror.
Yup, you asked him the right question: "How does it feel to BE the thing
you dislike so much?"
Hummingbird/Chris, why not put down the popular psych books, quieten down and
read something useful.
http://g.imagehost.org/download/0645/PDinModLifeMillon (2.4 MB)
Sadly, you have little insight and will likely imagine everyone else is weird
in the way the book describes but not you.
> "John Stubbings" posting today as: 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>
> >On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:57:53 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
> >
> >> Let's try a THIRD time to get Stubbings to focus on the facts
> >
> >OK, 82.5.94.219 is not my IP address.
>
> liar.
Prove it. Get off your fat, lazy, lying ass and PROVE it.
You can't, can you? All you can do is hop around like a cartoon
clown and screech "IS TO!" over and over.
> I will let other people draw their own conclusions from all that.
We have. The conclusion is that both you and Stubble are total
fuckwits, but you're the childish sort of fuckwit and he's the
pompous ass sort of fuckwit.
You two compliment each other perfectly.
> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
> >"straw man."
>
>
> Nope. You're far worse. You're a liar and a forger.
>
> All proven.
Pot... kettle... absence of color.
>
>
> Stubbings world class technical knowledge:
> ___________________________________________________
> John Stubbings:
> "idiot, in the real world, smart people are using Vista"
> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.politics.misc/msg/db3fc1351af8ceaa
> ___________________________________________________
>
>
>
> 'Anonymous Remailer (austria)' (probably John Stubbings)
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:53:34 +0100 (CET), Anonymous Coward
> <cri...@ecn.org> wrote, by way of
> <2010011019533...@www.ecn.org>, in
> alt.comp.freeware -->
>
> <....>
>
> And, being as all I see lately from 'ecn.org' is cowards hiding behind
> (an) anon remailer[s], I've decided to drop a k/f (Message-iD:
> {ecn.org}) on said remailer, 'cause (as of late; ymmv) only "Anonymous
> Cowards" use it.
>
> Thank you, Forte Inc., for making Message-iD kill-filtering a
> possibility (within Agent).
Well suck the end of my ying-yang, clown.
--
Jew First, Jew Always, Phuck the Gentiles
(or at least give me your money)
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:06:33 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
>
> You only have to prove that is my IP.
>
> Just prove it, and �1000 is yours!
>
> Anyone prove it, and �1000 is theirs.
>
> My money is safe hummy!
>
> Have you /any/ hard evidence? Any at all?
>
> No. Surprise! Ha!
>
> ... Quite funny really is it not? that just another bullshit talking point
> for you has blown up into complete humiliation. You're dug in so deep you
> can't get out.
>
> So funny, you /know/ it's not my IP. I know /you/ know it's not my IP.
>
> BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>
Hummingbird will probably tell you he doesn't want to prove it's your IP
because he doesn't need the money. Ha!
I'm almost sure I saw a red streak run past my windows.
--
Master of Puppets We are all Rich Rosen
DENSA Life Achievement � Am I the only one with half a brain?
> Hu
*SHADDUP*
--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAkjw4EoACgkQUZCI41IC43gJTwCeI0vKkgyiazmwJRw4JE8Pl74m
gWoAoJchc1JgAk0/5Pet[-39gm=[3953
=1aIM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Heh!
You realize that by Hummingturd's OWN CRITERIA he's now admitted
he's guilty of the very same forgeries he's blaming his lover
Stubby for.
I mean.... all of a sudden he got real quiet about it, and there's
no more denials on his part.
That's PROOF that I nailed it perfectly!
*snicker*
>
>