On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:14:41 -0700, Craig <netbu...@REMOVEgmail.com>
wrote:
>On 10/07/2012 12:16 PM, Art wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:52:38 -0700, Craig
>> <netbu...@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/07/2012 09:59 AM, Art wrote:
>>>> I've been following Barry's development of Precise Puppy Linux
>>>> and wanted to be able to boot to versions of it plus my favorite
>>>> Puppy breed Lucid 528. Since I have both Windows XP and 2000
>>>> installed, I spent some time figuring out how to boot to any of
>>>> my operating systems. My web page describes the method I worked
>>>> out:
http://home.ptd.net/~artnpeg
>>> Solid reference Art, thanks. I don't understand, though, why you
>>> chose two boot menus instead of going with something like GRUB.
>>
>> As I said to Zak, I couldn't find a single menu arrangement I felt
>> comfortable with. I'm all ears if you know of a good single menu
>> approach to boot versions of Windows as well as Linux.
>GRUB. It'll handle more than just Win & Linux, if you're ever so
>inclined. Been using it for a long time now with no ill effects and,
>since it's used by most of the Linux distributions, there's a lot of
>support, development & maintenance.
>
>> GNU GRUB is a Multiboot boot loader. It was derived from GRUB, the
>> GRand Unified Bootloader, which was originally designed and
>> implemented by Erich Stefan Boleyn.
>
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/
Well, so far I haven't found in the documentation that GNU GRUB is
capable of booting Windows. It simply throws the ball to NTDLR via
its chainloader command. Therein lies the problem when multiple
versions of Windows need to be on a single menu along with versions of
Linux. There's no problem with single menu if only one version of
Windows is involved and multiple Linux versions.
What am I missing?
Art