All the best,
--
Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
It quite frankly stinks. I imagine is the binary groups which are the
problem. So I reckon text servers could be the way to go if the isps will
fund them.
I hate web based groups as no two have the same interface and quite a few
still have the stupid type in from the picture system to exclude blind
users.
Brian
--
Brian Gaff - bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Mike Russell" <grou...@MOVEcurvemeister.com> wrote in message
news:xubrn2gu...@mike.curvemeister.com...
Sincerely chris
>
--
Chris McMillan
http://www.chinavision.org.uk/
http://www.oneplusone.org.cn�
> The quickest way to finish use net is to have us all use Google
> Groups. Even the fully sighted find that difficult to use.
Googl Groups has destroyed access to the USENET archives. The archives
were a great resource to many of us who are very unhappy about that.
As far as the subject goes... It makes little difference that AT&T is
discontinuing their own USENET service since USENET service is readily
available from other places. A serious problem would be if someday
Internet Service Providers attempt to block access to USENET servers.
Hopefully that day will never come.
The USENET archives are still available at groups.google.com. You're right
that they are a great resource.
> As far as the subject goes... It makes little difference that AT&T is
> discontinuing their own USENET service since USENET service is readily
> available from other places.
Absolutely - USENET may get smaller, but it will be here for the people who
really want it.
Brian
--
Brian Gaff - bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"John Doe" <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:0045dce9$0$29233$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...