Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Google hacks your Gmail account to steal personal data
33 views
Skip to first unread message
Naum Zahran
Apr 29, 2012, 9:28:15 PM4/29/12
to
"In other words, Google is taking the intimate personal data in your
Gmail account, using it to spy more effectively on you, and also using
it for its own (hoped for) gain. That sounds pretty evil. Although the
company doubtless has a canned response for why it took this step
without asking permission first."
http://gawker.com/5800868/how-google-spies-on-your-gmail-account-and-how-to-stop-it
Gmail account, using it to spy more effectively on you, and also using
it for its own (hoped for) gain. That sounds pretty evil. Although the
company doubtless has a canned response for why it took this step
without asking permission first."
http://gawker.com/5800868/how-google-spies-on-your-gmail-account-and-how-to-stop-it
Naum Zahran
Apr 29, 2012, 9:30:21 PM4/29/12
to
Naum Zahran
May 2, 2012, 1:05:56 AM5/2/12
to
Google knowingly hacked private wireless networks to steal personal
private data
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/google-aware-of-data-scoop-20120429-1xsxx.html
Naum Zahran
May 2, 2012, 1:07:07 AM5/2/12
to
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Naum Zahran
May 9, 2012, 10:57:20 AM5/9/12
to
On May 4, 12:02 pm, Naum Zahran <nzah...@live.com> wrote:
>
> Google manipulates search results to favor its own products at the
> expense of competitors' products. It is hypocritical of Google who
> claim they don't "control" search results when there is outdated,
> irrelevant, harassing, misleading, and invasion of privacy content on
> others. That is OK, but Google gets a pass. They even got carried away
> that Google's former CEO gave orders to have his political donations
> deleted from search results.
>
> http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2081582/The-Developing-FTC-Googl...
Google used malicious code to track Safari browser users against their
wishes.
Google used malicious code to track Safari browser users against their
wishes. Google acted in an unethical fashion by running code without
notifying users of Safari browser or allowing them the option to
consent to being tracked. Google's actions are an invasion of privacy
and violates the rights of users.
Excerpts:
"Google intentionally circumvented the default privacy settings of
Apple’s Safari browser, using a backdoor to set cookies on browsers
set to reject them, in the latest privacy debacle for the search and
advertising giant."
"Given that Google announced it is backtracking on its privacy
promises to users in order to create the mother of all online profiles
by combining the data you give it to nearly all of its services, that
secrecy may be more disturbing than the “crime” itself."
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/02/google-safari-browser-cookie/
Excerpts:
"The lawsuit says that Google’s “willful and knowing actions” violated
federal wiretapping laws and other computer-related laws."
"For those not in the loop as to the current situation, a report
surfaced from Stanford researcher Jonathan Mayer that said Google had
allegedly used an exploit in the Safari browser to track users and
their browsing history."
http://www.webpronews.com/safari-google-privacy-suit-2012-02
Note: Certain Apple devices use the Safari browser by default.
Google's action's constitute essentially the use of a computer virus
(i.e. malicious code) to track users.
> On May 2, 1:07 am, Naum Zahran <nazahra...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Google knowingly hacked private wireless networks to steal personal
> > private data
>
> >http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/google-aware-of-data...
>
> > Google knowingly hacked private wireless networks to steal personal
> > private data
>
>
> Google manipulates search results to favor its own products at the
> expense of competitors' products. It is hypocritical of Google who
> claim they don't "control" search results when there is outdated,
> irrelevant, harassing, misleading, and invasion of privacy content on
> others. That is OK, but Google gets a pass. They even got carried away
> that Google's former CEO gave orders to have his political donations
> deleted from search results.
>
> http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2081582/The-Developing-FTC-Googl...
Google used malicious code to track Safari browser users against their
wishes.
Google used malicious code to track Safari browser users against their
wishes. Google acted in an unethical fashion by running code without
notifying users of Safari browser or allowing them the option to
consent to being tracked. Google's actions are an invasion of privacy
and violates the rights of users.
Excerpts:
"Google intentionally circumvented the default privacy settings of
Apple’s Safari browser, using a backdoor to set cookies on browsers
set to reject them, in the latest privacy debacle for the search and
advertising giant."
"Given that Google announced it is backtracking on its privacy
promises to users in order to create the mother of all online profiles
by combining the data you give it to nearly all of its services, that
secrecy may be more disturbing than the “crime” itself."
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/02/google-safari-browser-cookie/
Excerpts:
"The lawsuit says that Google’s “willful and knowing actions” violated
federal wiretapping laws and other computer-related laws."
"For those not in the loop as to the current situation, a report
surfaced from Stanford researcher Jonathan Mayer that said Google had
allegedly used an exploit in the Safari browser to track users and
their browsing history."
http://www.webpronews.com/safari-google-privacy-suit-2012-02
Note: Certain Apple devices use the Safari browser by default.
Google's action's constitute essentially the use of a computer virus
(i.e. malicious code) to track users.
Naum Zahran
May 9, 2012, 9:03:17 PM5/9/12
to
On May 4, 12:02 pm, Naum Zahran wrote:
> On May 2, 1:07 am, Naum Zahran <nazahra...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> On May 2, 1:07 am, Naum Zahran <nazahra...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Google knowingly hacked private wireless networks to steal personal
> > private data
>
> > private data
>
> >http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/google-aware-of-data...
>
> Google manipulates search results to favor its own products at the
> expense of competitors' products. It is hypocritical of Google who
> claim they don't "control" search results when there is outdated,
> irrelevant, harassing, misleading, and invasion of privacy content on
> others. That is OK, but Google gets a pass. They even got carried away
> that Google's former CEO gave orders to have his political donations
> deleted from search results.
>
> Google manipulating search results to promote its own products just to
>
> Google manipulates search results to favor its own products at the
> expense of competitors' products. It is hypocritical of Google who
> claim they don't "control" search results when there is outdated,
> irrelevant, harassing, misleading, and invasion of privacy content on
> others. That is OK, but Google gets a pass. They even got carried away
> that Google's former CEO gave orders to have his political donations
> deleted from search results.
>
> demote competitor products. Hypocritical of Google who invades users'
> privacy and promotes negative content on others. If Google affords
> itself such a privilege then why do they claim they don't control
> search results especially if there is outdated, incorrect, irrelevant,
> and private data on others.
>
> http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2081582/The-Developing-FTC-Googl...
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2081582/The-Developing-FTC-Google-Search-Antitrust-Case
0 new messages