Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Question on 2/4 Strip

0 views
Skip to first unread message

R Crouse

unread,
Feb 4, 2005, 5:04:51 PM2/4/05
to
Maybe I am missing something, but why would Leaves be significant?
Any ideas?

TIA,

-Robert.


Sebastian Bleasdale

unread,
Feb 5, 2005, 12:07:10 PM2/5/05
to
R Crouse wrote:
>Maybe I am missing something, but why would Leaves be significant?
>Any ideas?

It means that the clothing is not skins, which might indicate that the
axes were used for hunting rather than fighting.

--
Sebastian Your 'PIN Identification Number' will
henceforth be referred to as PIN.

Henning Makholm

unread,
Feb 6, 2005, 6:18:08 PM2/6/05
to
Scripsit sbl...@chiark.greenend.org.uk (Sebastian Bleasdale)
> R Crouse wrote:

>>Maybe I am missing something, but why would Leaves be significant?
>>Any ideas?

> It means that the clothing is not skins, which might indicate that the
> axes were used for hunting rather than fighting.

Whereas leaves means that the axes are used for chopping down trees
rather than hunting?

--
Henning Makholm "... and that Greek, Thucydides"

Stephen S

unread,
Feb 6, 2005, 10:41:27 PM2/6/05
to
to R Crouse I now respond:

CAMOUFLAGE!!!! They blend in with the foliage.
--
Stephen S.
-------------------------

Per Abrahamsen

unread,
Feb 7, 2005, 9:26:31 AM2/7/05
to
Henning Makholm <hen...@makholm.net> writes:

> Scripsit sbl...@chiark.greenend.org.uk (Sebastian Bleasdale)
>> R Crouse wrote:
>
>>>Maybe I am missing something, but why would Leaves be significant?
>>>Any ideas?
>
>> It means that the clothing is not skins, which might indicate that the
>> axes were used for hunting rather than fighting.
>
> Whereas leaves means that the axes are used for chopping down trees
> rather than hunting?

Chopping down trees is a rather drastic mean if the goal is to collect
leaves.

On the other hand, axes are more traditionally associated with
chopping down trees (or fighting) than with hunting.

I just assumed the significance of leaves would be explained later.

Hop-Frog

unread,
Feb 7, 2005, 10:50:28 AM2/7/05
to
Per Abrahamsen <abr...@dina.kvl.dk> wrote in
news:rjy8e0v...@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk:

> I just assumed the significance of leaves would be explained later.
>

Me too. I mean, it's not as if the leaves comment is the only thing not
yet explained in this story line.

(A guess: Leaves mean the trees are growing. Growing requires time. Bun-
bun's crew seems awfully concerned about being on "short time," and they
appear to be sailing around outside of time. I think they're stealing
time, and the less time they have, the weaker they are. Having a plentiful
supply of leaves suggests the villagers have more than enough time, and
thus are quite healthy and strong.)

--
I am simply Hop-Frog, the jester--and this is my last jest.

(Please note: to reduce spam, I periodically modify this address. If an
email to me bounces, increment the number in my address by one.)

Henning Makholm

unread,
Feb 7, 2005, 11:29:12 AM2/7/05
to
Scripsit Per Abrahamsen <abr...@dina.kvl.dk>
> Henning Makholm <hen...@makholm.net> writes:

>> Whereas leaves means that the axes are used for chopping down trees
>> rather than hunting?

> Chopping down trees is a rather drastic mean if the goal is to collect
> leaves.

True, but if you go around chopping down trees for other purposes,
you'll end up with a surplus of leaves. When you live in a dimensional
bubble, you can't afford to let them go to waste.

--
Henning Makholm "You are in a little twisting
maze of passages, all different"

Keith Jones

unread,
Feb 9, 2005, 1:23:16 AM2/9/05
to
Stephen S wrote:
> to R Crouse I now respond:
>
> CAMOUFLAGE!!!! They blend in with the foliage.

And they spend all their time on the care of their weapons. Personal
appearance and grooming is of only secondary importance.

--
keith + stormsdream.com

Samuel Robinson

unread,
Feb 9, 2005, 9:11:04 PM2/9/05
to

"R Crouse" <robert...@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
news:7kSMd.32205$iC4....@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...

> Maybe I am missing something, but why would Leaves be significant?
> Any ideas?
>

Uh, here's a guy with two well maintained fighting weapons, and competent to
the point where he's fighting with no armor? No visible scars, so either
he's not really a fighter, or no one can touch him.

Just a possibility now...

Nick

unread,
Feb 15, 2005, 11:23:02 AM2/15/05
to
Sebastian Bleasdale wrote:

> R Crouse wrote:
>> Maybe I am missing something, but why would Leaves be
>> significant? Any ideas?
>
> It means that the clothing is not skins, which might indicate that
> the axes were used for hunting rather than fighting.

I would think it would be the opposite since they would be more likely
to get skins from hunting rather than fighting.

Message has been deleted
0 new messages