Obama and the Democratic Party Still Betraying the Working-People of the United States
mimus
immigration-- is connived at by the Mexican government to relieve its own
population pressure, benefit from monies sent back to Mexico, and as
basis of a revanchist exercise to at least de facto regain the US
Southwest.
And the Mexican unconventional "population offensive" against the US--
illegal immigration-- is connived at by the Catholic Church in both Mexico
and the United States in order to bolster Catholic numbers and therefore
Catholic political power in the United States.
And the Mexican unconventional "population offensive" against the US--
illegal immigration-- is connived at by the American plutocracy and its
political flacks as yet one more method of attacking the value of labor in
the United States, the vast majority of Americans being working-people
dependent on the value of their labor as their sole financial resource,
regardless of skill-level, as always and everywhere.
Thus we see the de facto head of the "new" Democratic Party, President
Barack Obama, still pushing as he always has to legalize the latest
accumulation of illegal Mexican immigrants, in Second Amnesty, to "take
care of the problem for good", after which the US will "get serious" about
illegal immigration and border security.
_Second_ Amnesty, for there was a First Amnesty at the end of the '80s,
which was promised (by among others such luminaries as Catholic "liberal"
Senator Ted Kennedy, who also pushed Second Amnesty) to "take care of the
problem for good", after which the US would "get serious" about illegal
immigration and border security.
First Amnesty legalized several million illegal Mexican immigrants, most
of whom promptly began working to illegally import more Mexican
immigrants, so that the Second Amnesty now being pushed by "liberal"
Democrats and "conservative" Republicans alike will be for anywhere from
ten to twenty million illegal Mexican immigrants.
None dare call it treason, of course.
None dare call it theocratic subversion, either.
And when was the last time you heard a Democratic or Republican politician
use the word "plutocracy"?
--
We're owned by them. Business. That's where the campaign money comes
from now. In the nineteen-eighties we gave up on the little guys. We
started drinking from the same trough as the Republicans.
< Democratic House Budget Committee Chairman Marty Sabo, 1993
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8878
http://levin.senate.gov/newsroom/supporting/2006/PSI.gasandoilspec.062606.pdf
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/04/summers/index.html