MONKEY MAN *HIDES* HIS COCK! FOR SHAME!
anon...@electra.lightlink.com
I've wasted so much time answering Mikey's idiotic
assertions that my tone level is "HIDING" because
I don't publish my address and phone number on
usenet, for the convenience of the O$A thugs, that
I have decided to settle this issue once and for all.
I have NOT wanted to share personal knowledge of
Mikey's DISCREDITABLE activities, but now I must:
MIKEY *HIDES* HIS COCK!
I have myself personally seen him *HIDING* it at the
airport, the grocery store, and even the train station.
In fact, I've NEVER seen him take
it out and wave it around in public.
The *REPTILIAN* conclusions are inescapable!
MIKEY IS IN *HIDING*!
MIKEY HAS SOMETHING TO *HIDE*!
MIKEY IS *LYING* ABOUT BEING IN *HIDING*!
MIKEY IS *LYING* ABOUT HIS CONSTANT *LIES*!
MIKEY IS THEREFORE *NOT* ABOVE TONE +40!
Fortunately, the *DRACO*nian
solution for Mikey is OBVIOUS:
COME *UP* TO *CAN'T HIDE*!
*PROVE* TO THE WHOLE WORLD
YOU CAN *NOT HIDE* YOUR COCK!
DON'T HIDE IT on usenet! POST A BINARY!
DON'T HIDE IT at the grocery store! Whip it out and Liver It Up!
DON'T HIDE IT at the bank! Ask for the Sperm Deposit Teller!
DON'T HIDE IT at the gas station! Demand "*FULL* Service"!
DON'T HIDE IT at the child care facility! "Let it ALL hang out!"
DON'T HIDE IT at the police station! Show them a NO-STICK MAN!
DON'T HIDE IT at the psychiatric evaluation! They WANT to see it!
DON'T HIDE IT at the "JOHNSON UNIT"! Tell your Reptiles: Eat Me!
I'm sure you will feel much better
when you GET OFF this Withhold,
which must make your "altruism"
and "egolessness" suffer greatly!
Thanks for the Wanks, :-)
Konchok Penday
Technical Writer, Gods Church
Recipient of the Alex Yakovlev
Technical Excellence Award :-)
<konchok...@net-prophet.net>
TEST DRIVE THE UNIVERSAL CLEARING PROCESS!
FOR MORE INFORMATION GOTO GODS CHURCH:
http://net-prophet.net/godshome/godshome.htm
"Get Your Ducks in a Row @ net-prophet.net!"
UCP usenet posts on alt.clearing.technology
Catherine Tyler
KP say...
>
>I've wasted so much time answering Mikey's idiotic
>assertions that my tone level is "HIDING" because
>I don't publish my address and phone number on
>usenet, for the convenience of the O$A thugs, that
>I have decided to settle this issue once and for all.
>
I hve a post on Mike's policy sometimes being harmful,I'll wrap n' post it
in the morning.In the meantime,KP,you said..
>I have NOT wanted to share personal knowledge of
>Mikey's DISCREDITABLE activities, but now I must:
>
> MIKEY *HIDES* HIS COCK!
>
>I have myself personally seen him *HIDING* it at the
>airport, the grocery store, and even the train station.
>
>In fact, I've NEVER seen him take
>it out and wave it around in public.
(Big snipz)
Pack it in KP,I'm trying to eat my pizza :-)
(You've already been banned from breakfast for making me laugh...you are
obviously trying to make me choke to death on my pizza :-))
Sigh,I'll go wrap that post I mentioned up,shall I?.
Sarathrine of Brit'z-are-never-lost.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Canuck
anon...@electra.lightlink.com wrote in message
<93av6l$ht4$1...@adore.lightlink.com>...
michael_m...@my-deja.com
Hi Martin,
I was just following your example :))
Tis sad for you that you have no idea the harm you create to all of
life, even yourself, with your vile spew.
Scorpio and Mudder can explain this to you. Homer has also given some
great examples of the harm created by neg thoughts and postulates. If
you have done your UCP properly you should be aware of the effect of
neg postulates and thought.
Michael Mourer
In article <93av6l$ht4$1...@adore.lightlink.com>,
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
anon...@electra.lightlink.com
wrote in thread "Re: MONKEY MAN *HIDES* HIS COCK! FOR SHAME!", on Mon, 08
Jan 2001 18:29:36 GMT, :
Monkey Man Moans:
>Hi Martin,
You just CAN'T get over the GLEE
of continuously outing me, can you?
It's kind of pathetic for a man who has
achieved "egolessness" and "altruism",
and who just personally thwarted the
already-completed invasion of Earth
by invisible shape-shifting man-eating
REPTILES from Orion, by OUTLOVING
them Unconditionally, to stoop to such
stoopid little games . . . don't you think?
Your DISASSOCIATION from and NOT-IS
of basic elementary netiquette speaks
loudly of your awareness and intention.
LEAPIN' LIZARDS!
WHAT'S UP WITH THE *DRACOS*?
>I was just following your example :))
*STILL* BLAMING *YOUR* INSANITY ON ME!
>Tis sad for you that you have no idea the harm you
>create to all of life, even yourself, with your vile spew.
That's why so many people are speaking
up and THANKING ME for helping them!
>Scorpio and Mudder can explain this to you.
YOU ARE *HYSTERICALLY* HALLUCINATING.
Scorpio and I talked for hours this week, lost in
AESTHETICS/PERCEPTION, and laughing not
just a little uproariously about your amazing
stupidifecalization. He says I light up his
universe. I say the same about him. I don't
see either of us has been illuminated by you.
>Homer has also given some great examples of
>the harm created by neg thoughts and postulates.
That would be *ALL* HARM.
Are you saying homer is
a public damage zone?
>If you have done your UCP properly you should be
>aware of the effect of neg postulates and thought.
>
>Michael Mourer
I am reminded of that,
every time my attention
is sucked onto . . . you!
I DO *SO* admire your tenacious ability to
respond to the issues, arguments, facts
and challenges, by simply pretending they
do not exist, ignoring them entirely, and
SPEWING ON IN *DISASSOCIATION*.
I think you should *RUN OFF* some of those
pesky Animal Minds for Scorpio and Mudrunner.
They don't even assert to being up at tone 20,
much less above 40. Why don't you just brush
those pesky ANIMAL LICE off of them and allow
them to float up to your level of comic awareness
. . . so they will see everything just as you do now?
ARE YOU *MAD*, AT THEM OR SOMETHING?
By the way, WHY are you ALLOWING THEM to *HIDE*?
WHY ARE YOU NOT COMPULSIVELY OUTING THEM?
Why have you not objected to THEIR dispicable
out ethics in not publishing their "real" names,
address and phone numbers? The fact that
they are on the master O$A SP-attack-list has
absolutely nothing to do with it! Why have you
not SPEWED on about the *WITHHOLD* they
have NOW *FORCED* ON YOU, that was their
criminal betrayal of you, to put you in that awful
position? YOU MUST LOVE *ME* EVEN MORE!
You have just proved you are not really altruistic,
or YOU WOULD HAVE OUTED THEM FOR THEIR
OWN KARMIC GOOD, AS A PUBLIC SERVICE!
Could that be because they still have the amazing
tolerance to let you crash there for a few days . . .
and the astonishing generosity to KEEP trying to
give you at least the IDEA of a CLUE reflected thru
the not-so-fun-house mirror of your tortured soul?
DON'T *HIDE* THAT COCK AWAY, MIKEY!
JUST LET IT ALL HANG OUT . . .
WITH LIZZY AND THE DRACOS!
Konchok Penday
Technical Writer, Gods Church
Recipient of the Alex Yakovlev
Technical Excellence Award :-)
<konchok...@net-prophet.net>
TEST DRIVE THE UNIVERSAL CLEARING PROCESS!
FOR MORE INFORMATION GOTO GODS CHURCH:
http://net-prophet.net/godshome/godshome.htm
"Get Your Ducks in a Row @ net-prophet.net!"
UCP usenet posts on alt.clearing.technology
==========================================
CB Willis
michael_m...@my-deja.com wrote to KP:
>have done your UCP properly you should be aware of the effect of
>neg postulates and thought.
It's really unclear there is any necessary relation between UCP and
understanding the consequences of one's actions on others or all of
life.
The behavior in question looks more like a dramatization of the
life-process called OSA than UCP.
- CBW
CB Willis
>life-process called OSA than UCP.
Correction:
should be "reverse life-process"
- CBW
Jay Steiner
>michael_m...@my-deja.com wrote to KP:
>>have done your UCP properly you should be aware of the effect of
>>neg postulates and thought.
>
>On 8 Jan 2001 15:23:40 -0500, cbwi...@adore.lightlink.com (CB Willis) wrote:
>The behavior in question looks more like a dramatization of the
>life-process called OSA than UCP.
JS responds to CBW:
Heavy, consideration there, CBW,and perhaps insightful. Could be some
unresolved residue from that experience. KP makes his point, but the
manner in which he makes it leaves one wondering where he's at.
Doesn't attest well to Aesthetic band. Lot of crude melodrama. Seems
to prefer sledge hammers to velvet gloves. To each his own. Or maybe
a bit more UCP.
JS
>CBW: It's really unclear there is any necessary relation between UCP and
>understanding the consequences of one's actions on others or all of
>life.
You may be correct. I don't think so, based on my own experience with
UCP. But I would go so far as to say there is not any necessary
correlation between a PERSON having ATTEMPTED to resolve his issues
using UCP and understanding the consequences of one's actions on
others or all of life.
Would be a mistake to judge ANY process by the person who may not yet
have successfully reached elements of his case using it. A lot has to
do with personal confront. I've seen that again and again. Also has
to do with amount of time. Some elements of case are a bitch and are
not easily confronted even though a person is going through the
motions of process X. If they fail to confront a tough area, they
keep going round and round in the same rut. Even then, there is hope
the grinding will finally erode enough of the shell away to where that
which is being held at bay will finally break through. Better when it
comes off in huge chunks, of course, but that depends on severity of
the underlying pain (including potential loss of identity), current
life conditions/environment, and confront/courage/power level of the
confronter.
You got to BE there. "No case change" over time equals (IMO) "not
BEING THERE" using process X, for one reason or another. Whether PTS,
plysically ill, metally deficient, tired, drugged, sotted,
pre-existing fixed notions, competing philosophies, whatever. Doesn't
matter what causes the "not being there". (LRH and/or his researchers
were right aboiut many things). They simply are not, or not
sufficiently, and thus no or little case gain.
Yes, could be the process itself is deficient. But I haven't seen
that to be the case with UCP thusfar. It's good tech which cannot be
merely theorized about successfully IMO. And you can't dilettante
with it and "play" with it. You can't "be the auditor" interjecting
auditor thoughts while being the pc or seeker. Just additional
examples of "not being there." Do it or don't do it. But don't
think you've done it if you haven't. Pretty basic. If you weren't
IMMERSED in it, you weren't doing it to much extent. You KNOW when
you've DONE it (for the benefit of earnest novices trying UCP, not the
rest who have or haven't successfully tried it, but already "know it
all").
Whether and to whom the above might apply, well there are many
potential candidates on this NG. Everyone is pointing at someone
else. Each decrying everyone's insanity but their own. It's a
circus.
JS
CB Willis
Jay Steiner (Jay_S...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>Heavy, consideration there, CBW,and perhaps insightful. Could be some
>unresolved residue from that experience. KP makes his point, but the
>manner in which he makes it leaves one wondering where he's at.
>Doesn't attest well to Aesthetic band. Lot of crude melodrama. Seems
>to prefer sledge hammers to velvet gloves. To each his own. Or maybe
>a bit more UCP.
Manner yes, but beyond style issues.
Content is another item. I normally have a lot of room for disagreement in
that area, state my position then agree to disagree as needed, with rare
exception.
>>CBW: It's really unclear there is any necessary relation between UCP and
>>understanding the consequences of one's actions on others or all of
>>life.
>You may be correct. I don't think so, based on my own experience with
>UCP. But I would go so far as to say there is not any necessary
>correlation between a PERSON having ATTEMPTED to resolve his issues
>using UCP and understanding the consequences of one's actions on
>others or all of life.
Fully concur.
I daresay most persons come to some understanding of the consequences of
their own actions through avenues that are neither UCP nor attempted [but
presumably failed]-UCP. Unless you want to see the Golden Rule guidelines
as an anachronistic subset or even historical prototype of UCP, "where
could you be". But that would obviate the sledgehammer behavior, etc.
which obviously hasn't been obviated. Anyone with a little obnosis or
obstetrics could see that. Maybe the 251st hour of UCP would address
sledgehammer? Just one more hour? <plead, just one more time, with
feeling??> Big carrot dangling out there in the imagination oops that was
a hallucination par excellence ...alas, no guarantees under the
circumstances. If 250 hours didn't do it, why should we expect 251 to be
the magic number? It's always POSSIBLE [conceivable] the next time could
be the big breakthrough. That alone should make us be willing to go
again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. x25. Or
is that x251? Are we below death yet??
Yer all insane, folks. I, on the other hand, am merely eccentric.
- CBW
Ted Crammer
> I have myself personally seen him *HIDING* it [MM's cock] at the
> airport, the grocery store, and even the train station.
Hello Michael. Evidently Konchuck is VERY INTERESTED in the state of
your cock and feels that you are hiding it from him simply because he
can't see or touch it. Whereas most of us like to keep our cocks under
cover; your situation is a good example of the difficulties a being can
get into simply by BEING THERE in the presence of insanity and having a
cock secure in his pants. LOL
Here we can see how the CDEINR scale juxtapositions and intersects the
Tone and Know to Mystery Scales. If the being, Konchock in this
instance, were to remove HIS interests, desires, enforcements, and
inhibitions from the target area he would no longer feel that SOMEONE
ELSE was hiding it from him. In other words, THE CHARGE IS HIS.
Alternately, if the being, Konchock in this instance, were able to break
into a two-way communication a closer examination of the target area
might be permitted. This second option is hypothetical of course. LOL
In order to obtain an as-is-ness it is necessary to observe and
articulate time, place, form, and the exact nature of the event(s).
Would you care to throw some light on this situation and tell one and
all exactly which airport, grocery store, and train station Konchock is
referring to? I mean, where in the world could this have taken place?
LOL
--
Ted
anon...@electra.lightlink.com
Crammer) wrote in thread "Re: MONKEY MAN *HIDES* HIS COCK! FOR SHAME!",
on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 20:35:58 -0500, :
Ted Barks Like a Dog:
>KumSuck the tormented anonymous poster @ electra.lightlink.com wrote:
Konchok:
>> I have myself personally seen him *HIDING* it [MM's cock] at
>> the airport, the grocery store, and even the train station.
Ted Barks on:
>Hello Michael. Evidently Konchuck is VERY
>INTERESTED in the state of your cock
No, I could care less about that.
It is the sorry state of his case that makes
him HIDE it that I am so concerned about.
What will the REPTILES think?
HE NEEDS HELP!
>and feels that you are hiding it from him
>simply because he can't see or touch it.
He's not just HIDING it from me!
>Whereas most of us like to keep our cocks under cover;
YOU TOO ARE IN *HIDING*!
>your situation is a good example of the difficulties a being
>can get into simply by BEING THERE in the presence of
>insanity and having a cock secure in his pants. LOL
SEE! If you weren't in HIDING you
would NOT have those difficulties!
>Here we can see how the CDEINR scale juxtapositions
>and intersects the Tone and Know to Mystery Scales.
Figure-Figure collides with compulsive THINK!
>If the being, Konchock in this instance, were to remove
>HIS interests, desires, enforcements, and inhibitions from
>the target area he would no longer feel that SOMEONE ELSE
>was hiding it from him. In other words, THE CHARGE IS HIS.
Mikey's point exactly!
MY "AMs" FORCE HIM
TO HIDE *HIS* COCK!
I AM RESPONSIBLE
. . . FOR *HIS* CASE!
>Alternately, if the being, Konchock in this instance,
>were able to break into a two-way communication a
>closer examination of the target area might be permitted.
>This second option is hypothetical of course. LOL
Your entire universe is "hypothetical".
That's a polite word for hallucination.
With Mikey, the challenge is breaking OUT of
two-way comm . . . with his massive DUB-IN.
>In order to obtain an as-is-ness it is necessary to observe and
>articulate time, place, form, and the exact nature of the event(s).
>Would you care to throw some light on this situation and tell one and
>all exactly which airport, grocery store, and train station Konchock is
>referring to? I mean, where in the world could this have taken place?
>LOL
>
>
>--
>Ted
Ted is *VERY INTERESTED* in
where Mikey's cock has been!
I'm sure glad we gave you something
really exciting to think about today!
anon...@electra.lightlink.com
<Jay_S...@hotmail.com> wrote in thread "Re: MONKEY MAN *HIDES* HIS
COCK! FOR SHAME!", on Mon, 08 Jan 2001 23:35:34 GMT, :
michael_mourer wrote to KP:
>>>have done your UCP properly you should be
>>>aware of the effect of neg postulates and thought.
CB Willis wrote:
>>The behavior in question looks more like a dramatization
>>of the life-process called OSA than UCP.
Yes.
>Jay Steiner responds to CBW:
>Heavy, consideration there, CBW,and perhaps insightful.
>Could be some unresolved residue from that experience.
>KP makes his point, but the manner in which he makes it
>leaves one wondering where he's at.
Mostly two to four.
>Doesn't attest well to Aesthetic band.
Mikey does nothing to put me there,
but there are aesthetics in sledging.
>Lot of crude melodrama.
Yes. AMs, BTs, Reptiles, Interstellar Travel, DRACOS!
>Seems to prefer sledge hammers to velvet gloves.
No. I only get out the sledge when a clue won't do.
>To each his own. Or maybe a bit more UCP.
>JS
Works for me!
CBW:
>>It's really unclear there is any necessary relation
>>between UCP and understanding the consequences
>>of one's actions on others or all of life.
Of course not. YOU would have to MAKE
a connection, by ACTUALLY DOING UCP.
Jay:
>You may be correct. I don't think so, based on my own
>experience with UCP. But I would go so far as to say
>there is not any necessary correlation between a PERSON
>having ATTEMPTED to resolve his issues using UCP and
>understanding the consequences of one's actions on
>others or all of life.
Works for me.
>Would be a mistake to judge ANY process by the person
>who may not yet have successfully reached elements of
>his case using it. A lot has to do with personal confront.
Yes.
>I've seen that again and again. Also has to do with
>amount of time. Some elements of case are a bitch
>and are not easily confronted even though a person
>is going through the motions of process X.
Yes. Most X processing is simply
a Dramatization of Tone Level Y.
>If they fail to confront a tough area, they
>keep going round and round in the same rut.
For 14,000 . . . or even 269,000 hours!
>Even then, there is hope the grinding will finally erode
>enough of the shell away to where that which is being
>held at bay will finally break through. Better when it
>comes off in huge chunks, of course, but that depends
>on severity of the underlying pain (including potential
>loss of identity), current life conditions/environment, and
>confront/courage/power level of the confronter.
Yes. That is true.
But with most processes
*ALL* you have is "hope".
>You got to BE there. "No case change" over time equals
>(IMO) "not BEING THERE" using process X, for one reason
>or another. Whether PTS, plysically ill, metally deficient,
>tired, drugged, sotted, pre-existing fixed notions, competing
>philosophies, whatever. Doesn't >matter what causes the
>"not being there". (LRH and/or his researchers were right
>about many things). They simply are not, or not sufficiently,
>and thus no or little case gain.
Yes. Not being there and not looking at the right stuff.
>Yes, could be the process itself is deficient. But I haven't
>seen that to be the case with UCP thusfar. It's good tech
>which cannot be merely theorized about successfully IMO.
That sounds SO much better than "Get A Clue!"
>And you can't dilettante with it and "play" with it.
>You can't "be the auditor" interjecting auditor
>thoughts while being the pc or seeker. Just additional
>examples of "not being there." Do it or don't do it. But
>don't think you've done it if you haven't. Pretty basic.
For many people here on ACT,
it's definitely "Rocket Science"!
>If you weren't IMMERSED in it, you weren't doing it
>to much extent. You KNOW when you've DONE it
>(for the benefit of earnest novices trying UCP, not
>the rest who have or haven't successfully tried it,
>but already "know it all").
Ouch!
>Whether and to whom the above might apply,
>well there are many potential candidates on
>this NG. Everyone is pointing at someone else.
>Each decrying everyone's insanity but their own.
>It's a circus.
>JS
Today, it's a Cock-Ring Circus!
With plenty of BOZO CLOWNS!