Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Parents must do what they think is best for their son.

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Charles Jones

unread,
Sep 2, 2004, 2:02:41 PM9/2/04
to
If my son had appendicitis and had his appendix removed, would you
skin freaks be angry at that? What about his tonsils if he had
tonsillitis?

The fact of the matter is, it is my duty as a parent to decide what I
think is best for my son. If I think he shouldn't have a foreskin, he
won't have one, period, end of story. If I think he'll be better off
without the head of his penis, then I could have that lobbed off too.
I'm not saying I'd actually do that, but the point is if I thought it
was best for him, then I'd be completely justified in doing it.

Why can't you freaks understand this?

jAGS

unread,
Sep 2, 2004, 2:46:22 PM9/2/04
to
The key is the word "IF". Why not do them all at birth : circumcision,
remove the appendix, remove the tonsils, remove the nails (too hard to clip
and keep clean), remove the teeth (they almost always get decay and they
cost a fortune care for), ... anything else I could add to my list ?

"Charles Jones" <charles...@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:492633bb.0409...@posting.google.com...

Troy McClure

unread,
Sep 2, 2004, 2:55:24 PM9/2/04
to
If my son had appendicitis, I'd have his appendix removed too. In fact if I
tried to stop it, they'd probably take him away from me. If there were
medical reasons for him to be circumcised and there were no better
treatment, then I'd have him circumcised too. I would fully support his
right to be circumcised when he's 18, and I'd even pay for him to have it
done. I just don't think it makes sense for him to be circumcised though
when there are no problems. Numerous medical associations agree with that.
It's not even an issue in the UK, except for certain religious groups.

There are limits on what parents can have done to their children. They're
not a piece of property, and if someone really did want to have their son's
penis removed, they should be stopped. If someone actually went ahead,
their child could be taken away
from them. Courts are being more pro-active in taking children away from
parents who won't allow life-saving medical treatment. It's an anomaly to
me that all forms of female circ are banned, but male circ is still allowed.
I personally think that male circumcision will be banned in some countries
within the next ten years, and that in a hundred years it will almost have
died out. Even if your son is circed, I doubt that your great-grandson will
be.

Even in the UK, there are females who are circumcised. It's against the
law, but it still happens. I can't stop you from circumcising your son, but
there's a real chance that he might resent it. If my son wants to be
circumcised, he can still do it.

regards, Troy

"Charles Jones" <charles...@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:492633bb.0409...@posting.google.com...

Charles Jones

unread,
Sep 2, 2004, 8:39:28 PM9/2/04
to
"Troy McClure" <troy.m...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:<w0KZc.114200$b76....@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>...

(snipped (LOL!))

I don't care whether or not my son is happy if he's circumcised. I am
circumcised, so he is going to be too, end of story. And I can do
whatever I want to his penis. I can have the entire thing removed if I
want to, because I am his father, so shut the fuck up.

Charles Jones

unread,
Sep 2, 2004, 8:40:55 PM9/2/04
to
"jAGS" <bar...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message news:<ch7pn6$cu0$1...@news.tiscali.fr>...

> The key is the word "IF". Why not do them all at birth : circumcision,
> remove the appendix, remove the tonsils, remove the nails (too hard to clip
> and keep clean), remove the teeth (they almost always get decay and they
> cost a fortune care for), ... anything else I could add to my list ?

Because it would cost to much, and I don't want too. If I did want to
(which I don't) and could pay for all of that, then yeah I could have
all of that removed and it would be my right as his father to do so.

DarrinT68

unread,
Sep 2, 2004, 9:13:59 PM9/2/04
to
>Subject: Re: Parents must do what they think is best for their son.
>From: "jAGS" bar...@yahoo.fr
>Date: 9/2/04 2:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <ch7pn6$cu0$1...@news.tiscali.fr>

>The key is the word "IF". Why not do them all at birth : circumcision,
>remove the appendix, remove the tonsils, remove the nails (too hard to clip
>and keep clean), remove the teeth (they almost always get decay and they
>cost a fortune care for), ... anything else I could add to my list ?>

Let it be known that Bariz (aka E-Zen) is a well-known anti-Semitic Parisian.
Bariz, how long has it been since you've been on the receiving end of my sharp
cursor tongue!?eheh Today marks the beginning of a 2 year absence, eh?eh I also
see that your analogies still haven't improved! LOL! Allow me to humor your
insanity one last time: Unlike circumcision, appendectomy is still considered
an invasive procedure. If the appendix grew on the outside of the body, it too
would be removed with the same swiftness as foreskin. Remove the teeth, and you
are left with a visible deformity that impacts the overall appearance of the
face. Remove the foreskin, and you are still left with a perfectly functioning
penis that is overwhelmingly preferred by most of civilized society. Excluding
France, since only 47% of its citizens believe in bathing daily. Not exactly a
good example to emulate! LOL! -D, NYC "This legendary French-Jewish born
prophet & physician of the 16th century converted to Christianity in order to
avoid persecution" - NOSTRADAMUS

Troy McClure

unread,
Sep 3, 2004, 9:54:54 PM9/3/04
to
So to you don't care about what your child thinks and you think you can do
what the heck you want because you're the father. By that logic you could
have his entire head removed too.

I feel sorry for your children.

regards, Troy

"Charles Jones" <charles...@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag

news:492633bb.04090...@posting.google.com...

DarrinT68

unread,
Sep 3, 2004, 10:19:02 PM9/3/04
to
>Subject: Re: Parents must do what they think is best for their son.
>From: "Troy McClure" troy.m...@blueyonder.co.uk
>Date: 9/3/04 9:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <Of9_c.98053$a66....@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk>

>So to you don't care about what your child thinks and you think you can do
>what the heck you want because you're the father. By that logic you
could>have his entire head removed too.>>I feel sorry for your children.>>

Is it just me or is the above NEBBISH showing signs of guilt!?ehehe He reminds
me of Clueless Rue! LOL! McClure, the window of opportunity is still in your
child's favor! Have him circumcised now before you later regret not doing so!
Spare him a lifetime monstrosity of having to SHLEP that Neanderthal appendage
around! Afford him the same luxuries that you had been denied, through no fault
of your ignorant and uncaring parents! Do not make the same mistake! Break free
from the cultural chains that bind you! -D, NYC "Yes, I am a Jew, and when the
ancestors of the right honorable gentleman were brutal savages in an unknown
island, mine were priests in the Temple of Solomon" - BENJAMIN DISRAELI
(1804-1881, first Jewish Prime Minister of England, responding to Irish Roman
Catholic leader Daniel O' Connell, in the House of Commons, who cast aspersions
on his Jewish ancestry)


0 new messages