Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Obama Won!

Received: by 10.66.87.73 with SMTP id v9mr8482171paz.46.1352776096849;
        Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:08:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.229.231 with SMTP id st7mr4263304pbc.2.1352776096828; Mon,
 12 Nov 2012 19:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Path: s9ni5145pbb.0!nntp.google.com!kt20no7265815pbb.1!postnews.google.com!uk1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.messianic,alt.christnet.christianlife,alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.bible.prophecy,aus.religion.christian
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: uk1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=50.46.145.37; posting-account=jlGsIwkAAAAEOsUA8VGc-c3dtKzolUft
NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.46.145.37
References: <e9f7e20e-b712-477e-9cef-478d4f46bbf1@r5g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
 <xhHms.72258$oI6.34899@newsfe23.iad> <0ee6b788-a8ba-4655-b109-bb7069f758be@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <q9Jms.6917$sz4.3634@newsfe11.iad> <k7j2l7$64i$1@dont-email.me>
 <bagq98pvu917q82pk98i281jeoc449f6it@4ax.com> <k7lmhc$rls$1@dont-email.me>
 <n44t98pp3vv1d53mabsvh13oqrjlvfbv3r@4ax.com> <k7m590$ojq$1@dont-email.me>
 <0ktv981ol8m4oho4q1jmlv5sc61ev07k85@4ax.com> <k7ov38$2bs$1@dont-email.me>
 <prn2a898809d21bnqstbalok2suf2noh64@4ax.com> <k7s9d1$6h4$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026
 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.2,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <7e80e357-b584-4112-b6dd-68e01dd0d630@uk1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Obama Won!
From: Terry Cross <tcros...@hotmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 03:08:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 12, 5:56=A0pm, Rod <nhraf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 2:56 PM, duke wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 13:41:59 -0600, Rod <nhraf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On 11/11/2012 1:08 PM, duke wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:09:01 -0600, Rod <nhraf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> On 11/10/2012 11:38 AM, duke wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:57:28 -0600, Rod <nhraf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 We need to give the man a chance to do the right thi=
ng, and by the
> >>>>>>>> right thing I don't mean increase the debt.
>
> >>>>>>> Don't you understand, or not heard, that the current target is $2=
1 trillion?
>
> >>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0Duke...I don't let the spin masters of party politics w=
hip me into a
> >>>>>> frenzy over anything. Here are the facts: Republicans hold a major=
ity in
> >>>>>> the House, Democrats hold the majority in the Senate, Obama is a l=
ame
> >>>>>> duck President, Harry Reid is not going to allow any Republican id=
eas to
> >>>>>> prevail, John Boehnor, Speaker of the House, is not going to allow=
 and
> >>>>>> Democrat bills to survive. Everything coming to either house will =
be
> >>>>>> dead when it hits the floor.
>
> >>>>> Yes, thankfully.
>
> >>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 The socialist agenda cannot move forward quietly witho=
ut Republican
> >>>>>> help.
>
> >>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0Don't believe it ? Give John Boehnor's office a call, o=
r Harry Reid,
> >>>>>> call your congressman.
>
> >>>>> I know fully well what's going on. =A0And when the Republicans trie=
d to
> >>>>> participate 4 years ago, massa bama told them to shove it up their =
ass. =A0After
> >>>>> all, he well stated right out of the box that "we won, you lost".
>
> >>>> =A0 =A0 There you go! Now you know why you can't get anything done. =
The
> >>>> socialist agenda is basically stalled. I will support any attempt
> >>>> by the republicans to cap spending, but would prefer that they accep=
t
> >>>> new ideas and implement the good ones. Obama has a couple of weaknes=
ses,
> >>>> and I suggested to my reps that they explore and then exploit those
> >>>> weaknesses.
>
> >>> All of us want a fair shake, but some just don't get it. =A0America d=
oes not want
> >>> this disgusting obama care that been shoved down our throat. =A0Thank=
s to 3
> >>> senators that got the sweet deal for kissing his ass and voting for i=
t.
>
> >> =A0 =A0Obama cannot do more than an executive order, and those only ar=
e
> >> effective(legally) on government agencies and contractors. Obama
> >> need not expect any help from Boehnor or the House. Even some members
> >> of his party think he has gone to far.
>
> > It remains to be seen.
>
> > I actually got something form Newmax this morning in the email re a "3r=
d term".
> > Now that's what I would call a serious flaw allowing Exectuive Order ta=
king
> > control of this country.
>
> =A0 =A0Yeah, this line of crap has been circulating here as well. t's jus=
t a
> bunch of fear mongers trying to stir the population up to make things
> progress faster. The nazi's tried pulling this crap here in WW2, working
> out of a ranch house in the hills around LA.

That would be pretty silly.  At the time of WWII, there was no limit
on the number of terms a president could serve.

Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first and only American President to
break Washington's tradition successfully. He died in office a few
months after starting his fourth term. This gave rise to a successful
move in Congress to restore the two-term tradition in the Presidency.
As ratified in 1951, the Twenty-Second Amendment provides that "no
person shall be elected to the office of President more than twice".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_limits_in_the_United_States#President

Apparently, you believe if you say anything nasty about the Nazis, it
automatically becomes true.  And if anyone calls you on it, you
probably call your respondent a "Nazi" to deflect attention.

TCross