<snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
>I have, therefore, chosen this time and this place to discuss a topic
>on which ignorance too often abounds and the truth is too rarely
>perceived -- yet it is the most important topic on earth: world peace.

>     What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not
>a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not
>the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking
>about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth
>living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and
>to build a better life for their children--not merely peace for
>Americans but peace for all men and women--not merely peace in our
>time but peace for all time.

>     I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of
>rational men. I realize that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic
>as the pursuit of war--and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on
>deaf ears. But we have no more urgent task.

>     First: Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many
>of us think it is impossible. Too many think it unreal. But that is a
>dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is
>inevitable--that mankind is DOOMED--that we are gripped by forces we
>cannot control.

>     We need not accept that view. Our problems are manmade--
>therefore, they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he
>wants. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man's
>reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable--and we
>believe they can do it again.

>     Let us focus instead on a more practical, more attainable peace--
>based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual
>evolution in human institutions--on a series of concrete actions and
>effective agreements which are in the interest of all concerned. There
>is no single, simple key to this peace--no grand or magic formula to
>be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of
>many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static,
>changing to meet the challenge of each new generation. For peace is a
>process--a way of solving problems.

>     With such a peace, there will still be quarrels and conflicting
>interests, as there are within families and nations. World peace, like
>community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor--it
>requires only that they live together in mutual tolerance, submitting
>their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement. And history teaches
>us that enmities between nations, as between individuals, do not last
>forever. However fixed our likes and dislikes may seem, the tide of
>time and events will often bring surprising changes in the relations
>between nations and neighbors.

> So, let us not be blind to our differences--but let us also direct
>attention to our common interests and to the means by which those
>differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences,
>at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the
>final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this
>small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our
>children's future. And we are all mortal.
>- John F. Kennedy

> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:25:27 -0800 (PST), Snow
> <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:

>> I have, therefore, chosen this time and this place to discuss a topic
>> on which ignorance too often abounds and the truth is too rarely
>> perceived -- yet it is the most important topic on earth: world peace.

>>      What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not
>> a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not
>> the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking
>> about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth
>> living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and
>> to build a better life for their children--not merely peace for
>> Americans but peace for all men and women--not merely peace in our
>> time but peace for all time.

>>      I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of
>> rational men. I realize that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic
>> as the pursuit of war--and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on
>> deaf ears. But we have no more urgent task.

>>      First: Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many
>> of us think it is impossible. Too many think it unreal. But that is a
>> dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is
>> inevitable--that mankind is DOOMED--that we are gripped by forces we
>> cannot control.

>>      We need not accept that view. Our problems are manmade--
>> therefore, they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he
>> wants. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man's
>> reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable--and we
>> believe they can do it again.

>>      Let us focus instead on a more practical, more attainable peace--
>> based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual
>> evolution in human institutions--on a series of concrete actions and
>> effective agreements which are in the interest of all concerned. There
>> is no single, simple key to this peace--no grand or magic formula to
>> be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of
>> many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static,
>> changing to meet the challenge of each new generation. For peace is a
>> process--a way of solving problems.

>>      With such a peace, there will still be quarrels and conflicting
>> interests, as there are within families and nations. World peace, like
>> community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor--it
>> requires only that they live together in mutual tolerance, submitting
>> their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement. And history teaches
>> us that enmities between nations, as between individuals, do not last
>> forever. However fixed our likes and dislikes may seem, the tide of
>> time and events will often bring surprising changes in the relations
>> between nations and neighbors.

>> So, let us not be blind to our differences--but let us also direct
>> attention to our common interests and to the means by which those
>> differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences,
>> at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the
>> final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this
>> small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our
>> children's future. And we are all mortal.
>> - John F. Kennedy

> (Isaiah 53:5) "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was
> bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon
> him; and with his stripes we are healed."

> John F. Kennedy was a man often attributed to having obtained earthly
> success without the help of his Catholic religion, but he was not a
> man of Peace by any means for he turned against his own  religion, and
> also against the mob who had helped him get elected.  Once he became
> the leader of our nation, he was great at making enemies of out of
> everyone. The people who think that he can be compared to the real
> Camelot Family of Christ are mistaken, and folly is forever their
> heritage.

> Isaiah was a prophet who had much to say about time, but where does
> Isaiah have anything to say about John F. Kennedy?  I find that the
> final prophecies revealed in the holy text does speak of Peace being
> obtained in the last day, but not without a huge price to pay.

> The bible speaks of Judgement coming down upon this earth, before man
> will be given Peace.

> It seems that all men have come short of the glory of God, and God's
> requires Justice to go forth, before Mercy.  For Mercy cannot rob
> Justice.  And Justice of God has a trademark.  It always ends with the
> destruction of one third.  When God sends forth his justice, he is
> always merciful to end the judgements after one third are destroyed.

> It is the folly of good men who think that Peace is obtainable without
> Justice.  Justice requires that Satan be captured and in prison inside
> a seal capstone before Peace can be ushered in.  Satan is the father
> of violence and he took Peace from the world, and covered it with a
> veil of darkness over the minds of men that keeps them from seeing eye
> to eye as brothers and living in Peace.

> The world is like a tree, the branches are the various nations and
> kingdoms, and the leaves are the problems that take away Peace.  If we
> take away the leaves (the problems) we still cannot bring about Peace
> in the world. Because Satan is at the root of the tree, and as long as
> Satan is free to walk the earth to and fro, there will never be Peace
> on Earth.

> However, Isaiah spoke of a Man Child who was wounded for our
> transgressions.  He was bruised in his heel for our iniquities: the
> chastisement of our Peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are
> healed.  I think this refers to coming of a special servant of God who
> will be bruised in his heel by Satan.  He is destined to be one of the
> Two Witnesses of God.  John the Revelator spoke of him in Revelation
> Chapter 11.  The Prophet Zechariah spoke of him in Zechariah Chapter
> three.

> The special mission of this Joshua is to direct the priesthood of God
> in how to capture Satan, and place Satan inside a seal capstone (like
> the one-eyed capstone you see on the US Dollar Bill) and place that
> capstone on top of the Pyramid of Khufu, for a thousand years of
> Peace.

> Because the Kingdom of Heaven has seven eyes, like the stone given to
> Joshua in Zechariah 3:9, but not like the one-eyed capstone seen on
> the US Dollar Bill.

>   – Joshua Gemmell (One Witness in The Hands of God.) <G><

> I have, therefore, chosen this time and this place to discuss a topic
> on which ignorance too often abounds and the truth is too rarely
> perceived -- yet it is the most important topic on earth: world peace.

>       What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not
> a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not
> the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking
> about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth
> living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and
> to build a better life for their children--not merely peace for
> Americans but peace for all men and women--not merely peace in our
> time but peace for all time.

>       I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of
> rational men. I realize that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic
> as the pursuit of war--and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on
> deaf ears. But we have no more urgent task.

>       First: Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many
> of us think it is impossible. Too many think it unreal. But that is a
> dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is
> inevitable--that mankind is DOOMED--that we are gripped by forces we
> cannot control.

>       We need not accept that view. Our problems are manmade--
> therefore, they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he
> wants. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man's
> reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable--and we
> believe they can do it again.

>       Let us focus instead on a more practical, more attainable peace--
> based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual
> evolution in human institutions--on a series of concrete actions and
> effective agreements which are in the interest of all concerned. There
> is no single, simple key to this peace--no grand or magic formula to
> be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of
> many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static,
> changing to meet the challenge of each new generation. For peace is a
> process--a way of solving problems.

>       With such a peace, there will still be quarrels and conflicting
> interests, as there are within families and nations. World peace, like
> community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor--it
> requires only that they live together in mutual tolerance, submitting
> their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement. And history teaches
> us that enmities between nations, as between individuals, do not last
> forever. However fixed our likes and dislikes may seem, the tide of
> time and events will often bring surprising changes in the relations
> between nations and neighbors.

>   So, let us not be blind to our differences--but let us also direct
> attention to our common interests and to the means by which those
> differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences,
> at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the
> final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this
> small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our
> children's future. And we are all mortal.
> - John F. Kennedy

On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:23:06 -0600, Rod <nhraf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 11/11/2012 7:49 PM, Joshua Gemmell wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:25:27 -0800 (PST), Snow
>> <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:

>>> I have, therefore, chosen this time and this place to discuss a topic
>>> on which ignorance too often abounds and the truth is too rarely
>>> perceived -- yet it is the most important topic on earth: world peace.

>>>      What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not
>>> a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not
>>> the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking
>>> about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth
>>> living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and
>>> to build a better life for their children--not merely peace for
>>> Americans but peace for all men and women--not merely peace in our
>>> time but peace for all time.

>>>      I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of
>>> rational men. I realize that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic
>>> as the pursuit of war--and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on
>>> deaf ears. But we have no more urgent task.

>>>      First: Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many
>>> of us think it is impossible. Too many think it unreal. But that is a
>>> dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is
>>> inevitable--that mankind is DOOMED--that we are gripped by forces we
>>> cannot control.

>>>      We need not accept that view. Our problems are manmade--
>>> therefore, they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he
>>> wants. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man's
>>> reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable--and we
>>> believe they can do it again.

>>>      Let us focus instead on a more practical, more attainable peace--
>>> based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual
>>> evolution in human institutions--on a series of concrete actions and
>>> effective agreements which are in the interest of all concerned. There
>>> is no single, simple key to this peace--no grand or magic formula to
>>> be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of
>>> many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static,
>>> changing to meet the challenge of each new generation. For peace is a
>>> process--a way of solving problems.

>>>      With such a peace, there will still be quarrels and conflicting
>>> interests, as there are within families and nations. World peace, like
>>> community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor--it
>>> requires only that they live together in mutual tolerance, submitting
>>> their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement. And history teaches
>>> us that enmities between nations, as between individuals, do not last
>>> forever. However fixed our likes and dislikes may seem, the tide of
>>> time and events will often bring surprising changes in the relations
>>> between nations and neighbors.

>>> So, let us not be blind to our differences--but let us also direct
>>> attention to our common interests and to the means by which those
>>> differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences,
>>> at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the
>>> final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this
>>> small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our
>>> children's future. And we are all mortal.
>>> - John F. Kennedy

>> (Isaiah 53:5) "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was
>> bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon
>> him; and with his stripes we are healed."

>> John F. Kennedy was a man often attributed to having obtained earthly
>> success without the help of his Catholic religion, but he was not a
>> man of Peace by any means for he turned against his own  religion, and
>> also against the mob who had helped him get elected.  Once he became
>> the leader of our nation, he was great at making enemies of out of
>> everyone. The people who think that he can be compared to the real
>> Camelot Family of Christ are mistaken, and folly is forever their
>> heritage.

>> Isaiah was a prophet who had much to say about time, but where does
>> Isaiah have anything to say about John F. Kennedy?  I find that the
>> final prophecies revealed in the holy text does speak of Peace being
>> obtained in the last day, but not without a huge price to pay.

>> The bible speaks of Judgement coming down upon this earth, before man
>> will be given Peace.

>> It seems that all men have come short of the glory of God, and God's
>> requires Justice to go forth, before Mercy.  For Mercy cannot rob
>> Justice.  And Justice of God has a trademark.  It always ends with the
>> destruction of one third.  When God sends forth his justice, he is
>> always merciful to end the judgements after one third are destroyed.

>> It is the folly of good men who think that Peace is obtainable without
>> Justice.  Justice requires that Satan be captured and in prison inside
>> a seal capstone before Peace can be ushered in.  Satan is the father
>> of violence and he took Peace from the world, and covered it with a
>> veil of darkness over the minds of men that keeps them from seeing eye
>> to eye as brothers and living in Peace.

>> The world is like a tree, the branches are the various nations and
>> kingdoms, and the leaves are the problems that take away Peace.  If we
>> take away the leaves (the problems) we still cannot bring about Peace
>> in the world. Because Satan is at the root of the tree, and as long as
>> Satan is free to walk the earth to and fro, there will never be Peace
>> on Earth.

>> However, Isaiah spoke of a Man Child who was wounded for our
>> transgressions.  He was bruised in his heel for our iniquities: the
>> chastisement of our Peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are
>> healed.  I think this refers to coming of a special servant of God who
>> will be bruised in his heel by Satan.  He is destined to be one of the
>> Two Witnesses of God.  John the Revelator spoke of him in Revelation
>> Chapter 11.  The Prophet Zechariah spoke of him in Zechariah Chapter
>> three.

>> The special mission of this Joshua is to direct the priesthood of God
>> in how to capture Satan, and place Satan inside a seal capstone (like
>> the one-eyed capstone you see on the US Dollar Bill) and place that
>> capstone on top of the Pyramid of Khufu, for a thousand years of
>> Peace.

>> Because the Kingdom of Heaven has seven eyes, like the stone given to
>> Joshua in Zechariah 3:9, but not like the one-eyed capstone seen on
>> the US Dollar Bill.

>>   � Joshua Gemmell (One Witness in The Hands of God.) <G><

>   An interesting post Joshua, thank you.

>    Rod

> First: Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many
> of us think it is impossible. Too many think it unreal. But that is a
> dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is
> inevitable--that mankind is DOOMED--that we are gripped by forces we
> cannot control.

> We need not accept that view. Our problems are manmade--
> therefore, they can be solved by man.

> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:23:06 -0600, Rod <nhraf...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> On 11/11/2012 7:49 PM, Joshua Gemmell wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:25:27 -0800 (PST), Snow
>>> <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:

>>>> I have, therefore, chosen this time and this place to discuss a topic
>>>> on which ignorance too often abounds and the truth is too rarely
>>>> perceived -- yet it is the most important topic on earth: world peace.

>>>>       What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not
>>>> a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not
>>>> the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking
>>>> about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth
>>>> living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and
>>>> to build a better life for their children--not merely peace for
>>>> Americans but peace for all men and women--not merely peace in our
>>>> time but peace for all time.

>>>>       I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of
>>>> rational men. I realize that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic
>>>> as the pursuit of war--and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on
>>>> deaf ears. But we have no more urgent task.

>>>>       First: Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many
>>>> of us think it is impossible. Too many think it unreal. But that is a
>>>> dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is
>>>> inevitable--that mankind is DOOMED--that we are gripped by forces we
>>>> cannot control.

>>>>       We need not accept that view. Our problems are manmade--
>>>> therefore, they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he
>>>> wants. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man's
>>>> reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable--and we
>>>> believe they can do it again.

>>>>       Let us focus instead on a more practical, more attainable peace--
>>>> based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual
>>>> evolution in human institutions--on a series of concrete actions and
>>>> effective agreements which are in the interest of all concerned. There
>>>> is no single, simple key to this peace--no grand or magic formula to
>>>> be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of
>>>> many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static,
>>>> changing to meet the challenge of each new generation. For peace is a
>>>> process--a way of solving problems.

>>>>       With such a peace, there will still be quarrels and conflicting
>>>> interests, as there are within families and nations. World peace, like
>>>> community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor--it
>>>> requires only that they live together in mutual tolerance, submitting
>>>> their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement. And history teaches
>>>> us that enmities between nations, as between individuals, do not last
>>>> forever. However fixed our likes and dislikes may seem, the tide of
>>>> time and events will often bring surprising changes in the relations
>>>> between nations and neighbors.

>>>> So, let us not be blind to our differences--but let us also direct
>>>> attention to our common interests and to the means by which those
>>>> differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences,
>>>> at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the
>>>> final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this
>>>> small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our
>>>> children's future. And we are all mortal.
>>>> - John F. Kennedy

>>> (Isaiah 53:5) "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was
>>> bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon
>>> him; and with his stripes we are healed."

>>> John F. Kennedy was a man often attributed to having obtained earthly
>>> success without the help of his Catholic religion, but he was not a
>>> man of Peace by any means for he turned against his own  religion, and
>>> also against the mob who had helped him get elected.  Once he became
>>> the leader of our nation, he was great at making enemies of out of
>>> everyone. The people who think that he can be compared to the real
>>> Camelot Family of Christ are mistaken, and folly is forever their
>>> heritage.

>>> Isaiah was a prophet who had much to say about time, but where does
>>> Isaiah have anything to say about John F. Kennedy?  I find that the
>>> final prophecies revealed in the holy text does speak of Peace being
>>> obtained in the last day, but not without a huge price to pay.

>>> The bible speaks of Judgement coming down upon this earth, before man
>>> will be given Peace.

>>> It seems that all men have come short of the glory of God, and God's
>>> requires Justice to go forth, before Mercy.  For Mercy cannot rob
>>> Justice.  And Justice of God has a trademark.  It always ends with the
>>> destruction of one third.  When God sends forth his justice, he is
>>> always merciful to end the judgements after one third are destroyed.

>>> It is the folly of good men who think that Peace is obtainable without
>>> Justice.  Justice requires that Satan be captured and in prison inside
>>> a seal capstone before Peace can be ushered in.  Satan is the father
>>> of violence and he took Peace from the world, and covered it with a
>>> veil of darkness over the minds of men that keeps them from seeing eye
>>> to eye as brothers and living in Peace.

>>> The world is like a tree, the branches are the various nations and
>>> kingdoms, and the leaves are the problems that take away Peace.  If we
>>> take away the leaves (the problems) we still cannot bring about Peace
>>> in the world. Because Satan is at the root of the tree, and as long as
>>> Satan is free to walk the earth to and fro, there will never be Peace
>>> on Earth.

>>> However, Isaiah spoke of a Man Child who was wounded for our
>>> transgressions.  He was bruised in his heel for our iniquities: the
>>> chastisement of our Peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are
>>> healed.  I think this refers to coming of a special servant of God who
>>> will be bruised in his heel by Satan.  He is destined to be one of the
>>> Two Witnesses of God.  John the Revelator spoke of him in Revelation
>>> Chapter 11.  The Prophet Zechariah spoke of him in Zechariah Chapter
>>> three.

>>> The special mission of this Joshua is to direct the priesthood of God
>>> in how to capture Satan, and place Satan inside a seal capstone (like
>>> the one-eyed capstone you see on the US Dollar Bill) and place that
>>> capstone on top of the Pyramid of Khufu, for a thousand years of
>>> Peace.

>>> Because the Kingdom of Heaven has seven eyes, like the stone given to
>>> Joshua in Zechariah 3:9, but not like the one-eyed capstone seen on
>>> the US Dollar Bill.

>>>    – Joshua Gemmell (One Witness in The Hands of God.) <G><

>>    An interesting post Joshua, thank you.

>>     Rod

> Tonight I pray that God will bless Rod for his kindness, for I am
> indeed the last of the Brethren of Christ, a true descendant of the
> holy grail family of Mount Heredom, and what you have done to the
> least of Christ's Brethren of Mount Heredom, you have done it unto
> Christ Our King. <G><

> I have, therefore, chosen this time and this place to discuss a topic
> on which ignorance too often abounds and the truth is too rarely
> perceived -- yet it is the most important topic on earth: world peace.

>      What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not
> a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not
> the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking
> about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth
> living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and
> to build a better life for their children--not merely peace for
> Americans but peace for all men and women--not merely peace in our
> time but peace for all time.

>      I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of
> rational men. I realize that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic
> as the pursuit of war--and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on
> deaf ears. But we have no more urgent task.

>      First: Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many
> of us think it is impossible. Too many think it unreal. But that is a
> dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is
> inevitable--that mankind is DOOMED--that we are gripped by forces we
> cannot control.

>      We need not accept that view. Our problems are manmade--
> therefore, they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he
> wants. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man's
> reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable--and we
> believe they can do it again.

>      Let us focus instead on a more practical, more attainable peace--
> based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual
> evolution in human institutions--on a series of concrete actions and
> effective agreements which are in the interest of all concerned. There
> is no single, simple key to this peace--no grand or magic formula to
> be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of
> many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static,
> changing to meet the challenge of each new generation. For peace is a
> process--a way of solving problems.

>      With such a peace, there will still be quarrels and conflicting
> interests, as there are within families and nations. World peace, like
> community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor--it
> requires only that they live together in mutual tolerance, submitting
> their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement. And history teaches
> us that enmities between nations, as between individuals, do not last
> forever. However fixed our likes and dislikes may seem, the tide of
> time and events will often bring surprising changes in the relations
> between nations and neighbors.

>  So, let us not be blind to our differences--but let us also direct
> attention to our common interests and to the means by which those
> differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences,
> at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the
> final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this
> small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our
> children's future. And we are all mortal.
> - John F. Kennedy

> "World peace" is Satan's tool.

> Mt 10:34  Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to
> send peace, but a sword.

> Ike