Liar. Just expression of emphasis and contempt. If you can't cop
ewith
that then fuck off and don't come back.
Carry on being an in-your-face, obnoxious jerk and you will continue
to be treated like oner.
So fucking what, hypocrite?
Take your crucifix, stick it in a drill chuck, poke it up your arse
and sturn up the speed.
***Comments: Am I wrong to say the above nut is an obnoxious jerk,nut?
Is he not an evil fellow? Is he an atheist? Is there any credibility
in him?
You judge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Devils advocate:
Do you usually make such sweeping generalities as if they were the
absolute truth?
***Comments: I make sweeping generalities by mere observations, on how
they reply to others,(and mine too), their comments, ridicules,
lies,vulgarities and evil insults.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Panamfl:
Frankie, has it not occured to you that your discomfort here is self-
inflicted? That none of it would have happened if you knew how to
mind
your own fucking buisness?
***Comments: You are meaning atheists’ discomfort, not mine, correct?
If they are comfortable, would they hurl such sheer evil words,
insults and ridicules?
Do you mean the follies of atheistic views should be kept to
themselves?Are you trying to say,I shouldn’t challenge with civility
to nonsensical views?Or,are you denying that this is a newsgroup?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After everything you experienced in AA and knowing how you feel about
atheists, you best leave us alone. There are hundreds of newsgroups
abanded by their communities, just post to them.
JohnN
***Comments: In response to my messages (the issue headlines; atheists
having bad morals,evils…)and about “my knowing” how atheist feel about
themselves, you show my words are true.
Why acknowledge as not having the wits or knowledge to rebut my
messages, rather than fearing my messages, urging me to leave?You have
exaggerated my threats as great to your false beliefs,or have I ever
seen any public domain so scared of my challenges?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was thinking the same thing. It seems they all follow a pattern.
He'll be posting more insults now and become more shrill. If the
pattern holds true, he'll claim victory and curse us to Hell.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
***Comments: Do I claim victory? You bet.I don’t post insults, but
only reflects their own follies; those who post insults, with the same
medicine.
Why should I curse?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ri-ight.
YOU invade this newsgroup, insult us, degrade us, and generally make
a
nuisence of yourself, and WE'RE in the wrong when we defend ourself?
Fuck you, ignorant one.
Syd M.
***Comments: Have you defended your position? All I see was some great
phobias, unable to challenge my messages, insults and ridicules and
vulgarities.Do you want me to show you further proves?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way: how is the prayer battle to restore my boyfriend's
amputated legs coming? Got lots of people praying for him yet? He
*really* would like to be able to live life without a wheelchair, so
get your people busy.
Sky eyes
Thanks awfully,
***Comments: You explicitly wrote that you are a pseudo-personality,eg…
You aren’t interested about getting prayers answered,”thanks awfully”,…
insincere folks,out for cheap fun,not serious….so get your people busy…
aren’t you proving to all ,you are just kidding?
Since you wouldn’t allow pseudo-folks into your home, why should
anyone take up the challenge?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Father Joseph Kang, very good hor
Bear.
***Comments: That chap stole money. At least I can see you despised
unrighteous folks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I corrected your subject line for you.
No need to thank me.
Smiler.
***Comments: Are all atheist evil?All atheist don’t have moral
codes,but each have their own standard of morals.
Thou shall have no other gods, a commandment which is still in display
in some courthouse in USA.Being godless is evil, and it is a
perspective known in America for a very long time.Besides, they are
doing evil deeds today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are many who have not replied to you - there are many that just
ignore you.
Saying "atheists are always..." is just prejuduice.
"All Singaporian chinese people are illogical morons..." is just
prejudice.
Do you understand?
Mark.
***Comments: Is it just prejudice? When a person has no morals, or
shown to have no morals, how would honestly stereotype them?
If their morals derived from “Survival of the fittest”, how would you
classify them?
If they had instinct as their guide, would it be bad or good?
Just an experiment: take out moral laws which were deeply rooted from
Judeo-Christian root, what do you think you would see?
Replace human conscience with animal instinct, what do you get?
Adam Sedgwick, a mentor of Darwin warned him. If he should pursue the
false theory of evolution, human degradations would be sunk to the
lowest. It happened as it was predicted. The first Genocide
recorded ;Communism (Atheisms) records human slaughters.
Communism is synonymous with Atheisms.......end..........
Yes. Because you're too fucking stupid to understand that you are the
original "..obnoxious jerk,nut.." for posting your moronic Bronze Age
nonsense to alt.atheism in the first place.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
***Your own posts is evidence of your "OBNOXIOUSNESS"if there is such
a word.If I did post moronic Bronze Age materials,you wouldn't dignify
my Comments,even a response.
But then,many may ask: why did Frankie dignify Panama Floyd, with a
response,(you being Obnoxious),a fact you can retort?
Answer: I am defending my Comments.
>
A lousy loon as well as an idiot.
THAT is a good point, Frankie, for a change.
I suggest everybody with better things to do than reply to you, do so
from now on.
Why?
You have proven time after time in here that you are unable to learn or
understand midly complex thinking.
A note: 'in here' is a very broad concept since you have this OBNOXIOUS
habbit of crosspoting your statements to many groups, like I do now.
>
> But then,many may ask: why did Frankie dignify Panama Floyd, with a
> response,(you being Obnoxious),a fact you can retort?
> Answer: I am defending my Comments.
>
You must be really very arrogant to write Comments with a capital C.
At first I thought it was a typo. Alas.
I, for one, think your the normal 'c' is too big for the word 'comments'
when they are made by you.
I don't say that to insult you, allthough I would be honored to be added
to the list in your original posting.
I say that because your opinion counts for little since you are unable
to engage into a scientific discussion.
You are unable to defend your views.
You back out cowardly (by ignoring replies that proof you are wrong), or
you respond with childish nonsense.
Nobody cares for again another religious zealot that claims stuff
without proof. We have seen millions of them, and the best part id they
don't even agree amongst themself. ;-)
So grow up and discuss your claims in a mature/scientific way, or be
prepared to receive more unfriendly responses.
Regards,
Erwin Moller
--
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult."
-- C.A.R. Hoare
I find the best way to respond to this droll is not to respond - oh
crap I just did
Yes of course.
> When a person has no morals, or
> shown to have no morals, how would honestly stereotype them?
>
You don't have to stereotype people that are "like" him - you say he
is an immoral person.
Stereotyping all blacks or all Jews because you meet an evil black
person or an evil Jew is wrong.
It is always wrong.
> If their morals derived from “Survival of the fittest”, how would you
> classify them?
Stupid.
> If they had instinct as their guide, would it be bad or good?
>
It depends.
A good person following their instinct will usually do good things.
A bad person following their instinct will do bad things.
> Just an experiment: take out moral laws which were deeply rooted from
> Judeo-Christian root, what do you think you would see?
>
Some good and some bad - because their are things in Judeo-Christian
ethics which are evil - so the world woykld be better place without
them.
The world would be a worse place without the good things that come
from Judeo-Christian ethics.
The same applies to the good and bad things that come from all
cultures.
Where would the world be without the ethics of Confucius?
He said many wise and ethical things and knew nothing of the God of
the Jews and lived and died 500 years before christ.
There is goodness and wisdom to be found in all human cultures.
Wickedness also.
> Replace human conscience with animal instinct, what do you get?
Some good and some bad - it depends.
> Adam Sedgwick, a mentor of Darwin warned him. If he should pursue the
> false theory of evolution, human degradations would be sunk to the
> lowest.
Well he was a foolish and stupid person to say such things - let us
listen to the wise instead.
> It happened as it was predicted. The first Genocide
> recorded
Read the old testament it speaks of many genocides carried out in gods
name.
You dont know much history of the world I see.
Mark.
So grow up and discuss your claims in a mature/scientific way, or be
prepared to receive more unfriendly responses.
Regards,
Erwin Moller
Reply: Thanks for such clarity.You are indirectly rebuking those who
response with immaturity,or those who made unscientific ways to be
seen as scientific. I have shown enough to you of people making silly
gestures,and so forth.
The last wisdom of words in my posts is about EXPERIMENTATION.It is
scientific.It is mature.It is reasonable.No one has yet to rebut on
that,so I regard it that I made good posts,mature and
scientific.Right?
***I sense you are helpless in expression.Is it not?
>On Nov 9, 4:07�am, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Christopher A Lee wrote:
>>
>> Liar. Just expression of emphasis and contempt. If you can't cop
>> ewith
>> that then fuck off and don't come back.
>>
>> Carry on being an in-your-face, obnoxious jerk and you will continue
>> to be treated like oner.
>>
>> So fucking what, hypocrite?
>>
>> Take your crucifix, stick it in a drill chuck, poke it up your arse
>> and sturn up the speed.
>>
>> ***Comments: Am I wrong to say the above nut is an obnoxious jerk,nut?
>
>Yes. Because you're too fucking stupid to understand that you are the
>original "..obnoxious jerk,nut.." for posting your moronic Bronze Age
>nonsense to alt.atheism in the first place.
He's somewhere between sociopath and psychopath, definitely a
narcissist.
He comes here acting like an asshole and turns into a whining
hypocrite who can't reap what he sows.
In short he's a typical in-your-face and in-denial Christian.
Reply: I watch most of the debates,as many as I can find in the
Internet.In the public domain.I read of the Genocides thing in many
websites,and heard many also discuss about that in Youtube,etc...
Eg.Moses was instructed to kill little children,women and many
folks,except to keep virgins for themselves...
Anyone who read Exodus would have known the context,and it was about
war.Such slanders had been going around for quite some time,but
recently it is getting more attention.
Those Kings used women as tool to seduce the Israelite into
adulteries.There were orgies of a grand scales.What kinds of diseases
and sicknesses spreading then?If I were God,or any spiritual leader,or
even you would also did the same thing like what Moses did.
eg.You wouldn't want carriers of Aids into your community,or Sars or
H1n1 flu to be all over your home would you?Would you want an Aids
carrier to be any where near your little girl?
In war,either you kill them or be killed.Showing mercies,it wouldn't
be War.
An American soldier in Vietnam--after seeing a little kid,out of
compassion let the poor little kid go,despite knowing he was an
enemy,and one who carries grenades and bombs.Later,that kid sent
explosives and kill many Americans,most of them ---that Compassionate
American soldier's buddies were dead because of his misplaced
kindness.
***Your buddies told you to mature and grow up.
You are welcome Frankie Lee.
I like clarity.
> You are indirectly rebuking those who
> response with immaturity,or those who made unscientific ways to be
> seen as scientific. I have shown enough to you of people making silly
> gestures,and so forth.
I don't care for your wordplay.
If you want to convince anybody that your creator is for real, you must
use REAL ARGUMENTS.
So far you didn't.
As for people replying to you in a immature way: Most of them I know are
reasonable people who are simply fed up with the creationists lies.
Why don't you make your case once and for all?
Put some proof on the table here.
___________________________________________________________________
I, Frankie Lee, can proof to you all God exists in a mature convincing
way. Here it comes:
......................................
......................................
......................................
___________________________________________________________________
If you need more space, feel free to use all the pages you need.
BUT your proof has to be convincing. Citings from holy books don't count
as such.
You and I both know very well you won't produce that proof.
And you and I both know you will evade the whole issue.
Please proof me wrong.
>
> The last wisdom of words in my posts is about EXPERIMENTATION.It is
> scientific.It is mature.It is reasonable.No one has yet to rebut on
> that,so I regard it that I made good posts,mature and
> scientific.Right?
>
Your last words 'of wisdom' in your post?
Are you referring to this?
[quote]
Replace human conscience with animal instinct, what do you get?
Adam Sedgwick, a mentor of Darwin warned him. If he should pursue the
false theory of evolution, human degradations would be sunk to the
lowest. It happened as it was predicted. The first Genocide
recorded ;Communism (Atheisms) records human slaughters.
Communism is synonymous with Atheisms.......end..........
[/quote]
How is that about experimentation? About scientific? mature?
I think you misdirected me or I misunderstand where you are directing me.
What piece of your writing did you consider scientific/mature?
> Devils advocate:
>
> Do you usually make such sweeping generalities as if they were the
> absolute truth?
>
> ***Comments: I make sweeping generalities by mere observations, on how
> they reply to others,(and mine too), their comments, ridicules,
> lies,vulgarities and evil insults.
The sweeping generality I referred to was the subject line of your
previous thread, which I present here verbatim:
"Atheists are always evil,bad character and immoral ALWAYS."
This is patently absurd and totally untrue.
Another evidence of your stupidity. No sane person would defend your
comments.
You are lying.
This is as far as I can tell your first posting to alt.atheism:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.christian/msg/d729e14b09f82d03
It's a torrent of insults...
>but
>only reflects their own follies; those who post insults, with the same
>medicine.
...and it's not in response to any visible provocation.
--
David Canzi
> By the way: how is the prayer battle to restore my boyfriend's
> amputated legs coming? Got lots of people praying for him yet? He
> *really* would like to be able to live life without a wheelchair, so
> get your people busy.
> Sky eyes
> Thanks awfully,
>
>
When the leg grows in, will he be on the major news channels? This would
be the news-of-the-millenia! It would mean the end of atheism as we know
it!
I'll be watching for it on the news....Thanks!
--
Larry
snip
Blow it out your ass, crackhead. Take your dead jew-on-a-stick and
shove him up your cunt. You're so fucking stupid we need a new word
for it.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
**Have you heard of the LakeLand revival?Miracles and great wonders
were seen,heard and felt by the many thousands.But every day,Attackers
from all side dispute it,reported that the Dead were not
raise,slanders and they poured scorn and strife.It came from carnal
Christians,liberal medias,non-believers etc...In the media,most likely
you will hear 10 out 10 bad reports.
Two days ago I interviewed a guy who had first hand experience over
there.It was electrifying and very sensational in that place where the
Power is seen,heard and felt.
Are you under the delusion that you are discussing your claims in a
scientific way?
And yet this supposed phenomena has not been documented by any
scientific standard. My suggestion would be that the next time such
an event to alert the scientific community and see if they can witness/
measure/research these alleged "miracles and great wonders", gather
affidavits from the witnesses, etc, etc.
You know, actually approach this in a scientific manner. Something
you're not aquainted with.
My guess is that these supposed "miracles and great wonders" are much
like the Loch Ness Monster. Other than a few grainy photos, and
tales told over a good ale, there is nothing to it.
..and it's not in response to any visible provocation.
Reply: No wonder you can shoot and say I lied just over this?So you
have reached a conclusion to proclaim that I lied,and the Jury's
verdict is set?And then the words goes around,among yourself?
Bill Maher and Dawkings are never Atheists?,and they have a right to
provoke and cause hatred and incite nonsense,shown to me from
Youtube....but none has a right to response?
Did you know anything about the Talking snake,that issue?Normally I
don't respond to such follies of yours,but when I didn't respond,you
silly guys began to assume it was true.How quick for you to label me
as a liar?
***Have you seen anyone attacking my comments,most of the time-I mean
the message or issue at hand?Have you not seen red-herrings?
Did you not show your stupidity?
Up till now NONE HAD WITHSTOOD AGAINST MY ABOVE MESSAGES,COMMENTS.
***You always show yourself as a dumb nut.Why?Why are you so
incredibly stupid most of the time?
When you talk about God,that is supernatural,something beyond the
natural realm.When you dsibelieve God,you are discounting the
Supernatural.
You mean you don't know Americans uses the $ bill which state God?
Knowing that the definition of God is supernatural,miraculous,a
spiritual world?
10 out of 10 nuts like you always confused of what you believe,and for
goodness sake,check a dictionary and see the meaning of God there and
learn some English from me.
Can you invite people to discuss about God,or disbelief about God and
then tell people don't talk about God--which is supernatural--and then
say it is not scientific?
I don't mean to offend--you people are really idiot and brain dead.For
the past 30 years I have never seen an intelligent Atheist proponents!
***Do you know what I like to think?It is so much better that the
Medias hide it from you and you goes on to be dumb.What do you think
why Mao wanted all the records ,books,..destroyed?
I use one word,"EXPERIMENTS"and the world goes haywire!So don't come
and tell me pseudo-science!
The kinds of ideas or words from above---I have heard countless of
times.
I always query a kid,why Christians don't documented them and show to
the Medias?Why?
Yeah, you keep believing that, Frankie.
Meanwhile, we'll be over here laughing at your delusion.
PDEW
OK, that's it.
Your belligerant arrogance and ignorance are your problem. Not mine.
>Plonk<
PDW
If as Todd Bentley claims, he can raise the dead in the name of Jesus,
how come those 20 who allegedly were raised from the dead at the
Lakeland Revival haven't come forward into the public eye and
presented their death certificates and other medical reports to prove
that they had actually been dead, and how Todd Bentley bought them
back to life?
And isn't it remarkable that Todd Bentley's ministry like so many
other self created ministries, is raking in the money, millions of
dollars every year, all because they are supposedly doing God's work?
Remember what happened to that charlatan Kent Hovind?
Frankie, I am still waiting for you godproof.
How hard can it be?
You guys had thousands of years, lots of resources, and enormous amounts
of money: Why couldn't ONE of you creationists proof something
worthwhile during that time?
WHY?
I think I know the answer, but you can go first. ;-)
Here is my former request to you, the one you choosed to ignore:
> Put some proof on the table here.
> ___________________________________________________________________
> I, Frankie Lee, can proof to you all God exists in a mature convincing way. Here it comes:
> ......................................
> ......................................
> ......................................
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
> If you need more space, feel free to use all the pages you need.
> BUT your proof has to be convincing. Citings from holy books don't count as such.
>
> You and I both know very well you won't produce that proof.
> And you and I both know you will evade the whole issue.
> Please proof me wrong.
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
Erwin Moller
My dear dear Frankie,
Really, believe me, we don't hate you.
Well, at least, I don't.
Don't get angry, it makes you look ugly.
>
> When you talk about God,that is supernatural,something beyond the
> natural realm.When you dsibelieve God,you are discounting the
> Supernatural.
The Supernatural, is by definition, outside our realm of investigation.
So WHAT is it excactly you are referring to?
Think about that please.....
>
> You mean you don't know Americans uses the $ bill which state God?
> Knowing that the definition of God is supernatural,miraculous,a
> spiritual world?
>
> 10 out of 10 nuts like you always confused of what you believe,and for
> goodness sake,check a dictionary and see the meaning of God there and
> learn some English from me.
You are pointing to a dictionary for definitions for God.
You know what a common problem for us, atheist bastards, is?
A common problem is that you creationists tend to have all different
views about this God.
It is kind of hard to discuss anything like that.
>
> Can you invite people to discuss about God,or disbelief about God and
> then tell people don't talk about God--which is supernatural--and then
> say it is not scientific?
Yes you can.
Apparantly you, theists, think it is reasonable to:
1) Claim God is supernatural, and thus by definition, outside our realm
of investigation
2) Claim he exists
Listen Frankie: That is NOT reasonable.
No matter how you try to twist that argument, it is NOT reasonable.
So yes, you can invite people to discuss God to tell them their
arguments make no sense. You are doing them a service by it, even though
they won't admit it at first.
>
> I don't mean to offend--you people are really idiot and brain dead.For
> the past 30 years I have never seen an intelligent Atheist proponents!
>
;-)
You are funny.
Why have you not responded I wonder?
Why have you not responded I wonder?
Oh rubbish. You are being deliberately rude and obnoxious and you love
it when you get abused as a result. It means you can tell yourself you
are being persecuted just like a Real Christian! Don't worry that it
doesn't count as persecution when you bring it on yourself by your
behaviour. Meanwhile, you still can't explain how all the fish and
plant life survived the Flood, except by admitting it didn't happen.
All you do is flap your hands and run away. Hey, you can even do one
of your experiments:
1) count the total number of plant and marine species in the world
2) count how many of those species could survive half a year under
five miles deep filthy freezing water
3) if the two numbers are different, no flood, but if they're the
same, the Flood looks a lot more plausible.
Get counting Frankie.
Andy
***I actually hit on ***send a few times but it just cannot go
through.Here you are making guesses about this and that.There are
limits to posting,and you have just "told" me you didn't know this?
Hello,read my other posts first.
***I wonder are you informed?BTW what does Kent and Todd had any
connections?This is incoherent talks.If I told you CBN,then what would
you say?If I told you CNN would not report it,what would you say?
History repeat itself.Atheists were so afraid me,told me not to invade
their Newsgroups.Then another say why I delay my posting,ignorant that
there are posting limits.You have your cake and eat it!
Atheists doesn't want to show it,and then question why it was not
shown.Atheists shut it down,hide the facts,then question why it was
not documented.
How come people just don't have brains?
**Do you know why area 51 must be kept secret to you guys forever?The
mystery will be forever a mystery,for you.Upon death,nothing will
happen.It will be forgotten.....I just love you...
***The medias really blind you?When everything was documented,you said
it is not.How to talk to a fool,like you,really?
If I show you the proof,then you jump and insults.(I mean generally of
you guys).
And when I show you proof,everyone goes haywire,use vulgarities and
what have you?And then would come back,pretend and act blur,as though
I didn't provide.
Show me intelligence,pls.
Why do you presume I was trying to claim a connection between Todd
Bentley and Kent Hovind, and then avoid my real questions?
>
> History repeat itself.Atheists were so afraid me,told me not to invade
> their Newsgroups.Then another say why I delay my posting,ignorant that
> there are posting limits.You have your cake and eat it!
Funny how you presume that I am an atheist just because I challenge
your position.
If you are experiencing posting limitations that isn't my problem, you
should find yourself a better newsgroup reader service.
>
> Atheists doesn't want to show it,and then question why it was not
> shown.Atheists shut it down,hide the facts,then question why it was
> not documented.
What is this supposed to mean, are you suggesting that atheists are
somehow censoring those sources you believe to contain the truth?
>
> How come people just don't have brains?
An insult, from the poster who claims never to insult people.
How strange is that?
1) There are no limits on posting
2) Why don't you read my posts first? You can search the archives to 4
years back to find them.
Don't you see that is not really working?
This stupid Chinaman is the most eager contributor to the coffer?
If not, his god will never forgive him.
Will it go 'round in circles, will it fly high like a bird up in the
sky.....
> Bill Maher and Dawkings are never Atheists?,and they have a right to
> provoke and cause hatred and incite nonsense,shown to me from
> Youtube....but none has a right to response?
Blather, blather, blather, blather. Go away.
> Did you know anything about the Talking snake,that issue?Normally I
> don't respond to such follies of yours,but when I didn't respond,you
> silly guys began to assume it was true.How quick for you to label me
> as a liar?
It's SOOOOOO easy to label you a liar and a fool. Most of us atheists in
alt.atheism are far better read, far more knowledgeable about your book than
you are. Many of us were raised in a religious home, and have freed
ourselves from the chains of theism. Do you the same, and fear no longer.
> The first Genocide
> recorded
... was the Thirty Years war, what was that about, exactly? How did the
protagonists distinguish themselves from each other?
--
David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
"Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a sacred
duity, and any response as persecution
Not authentic without this signature.
"Echolalia, Bruce, echolalia."
>Reply: No wonder you can shoot and say I lied just over this?
It's enough. You say you don't post insults. I show otherwise:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.christian/msg/d729e14b09f82d03
(Shorter version to escape damage by Google Groups brokenware:)
>So you
>have reached a conclusion to proclaim that I lied,and the Jury's
>verdict is set?And then the words goes around,among yourself?
The word goes around not just among "ourself" but in all the
newsgroups you crossposted to. Anybody who can follow a link
can see how false your claim is that you don't post insults.
--
David Canzi
His Priests won't either. And their the more immediate threat.
PDW
***Hello,I live in Singapore.My posts has limits.
***Of course I insult those who made silly remarks,in a provocative
manner to let them see their own follies.I know your political stand
were on my same footing,but that's another issue.
Your problem is,you have made accusations that Kent Hoving as
Charlatan,and suppose that Tod Bentley and others made millions
peddling the words of God.
It isn't true,as you suppose.
----------------***
Do you usually make such sweeping generalities as if they were the
> > absolute truth?
> > ***Comments: I make sweeping generalities by mere observations, on how
> > they reply to others,(and mine too), their comments, ridicules,
> > lies,vulgarities and evil insults.
Me: See,I have responded and there you say I have not.Is it a problem
of Understanding?Or is it you refer to some aspects not connected to
this Thread?
You have not responded to my reply to the post you have referred back
to, claiming you have shows up your lame attempt at suggesting I am
lying.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/charlatan
A malicious trickster; a fake person, especially one who deceives for
personal profit.
That is a perfect description of Kent Hovind.
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Evangelist_Hovind_found_guilty_for_tax_fraud
There is much to doubt about the sincerity of Todd Bentley as well.
http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/12/03/todd-bentley-speaks-through-steven-strader/
1. Is Todd Bentley an illegal alien having visa problems?
2. Is he afraid to return to Canada because the B.C. Government has
some serious questions it want to ask him about “welfare fraud” and
other fraud?
3. Where is Todd getting the money to stay in United States since he
resigned from Fresh Fire Ministries?
4. How come there has been no accountability for all the money Todd
Bentley has collected during the Lakeland Revival?
And interestingly enough Fresh Fire Ministries has distanced itself
from Todd Bentley, just as many Creationists have distanced themselves
from Kent Hovind.
If these two men are innocent of any wrongdoing, then why have so many
significant people in their movements turned their backs on them?
5. Did Todd send the money to Canada or did he keep it for himself?