Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Classical SF query... Another Nad-Digger tard fart!
66 views
Skip to first unread message
Checkmate
Oct 12, 2012, 8:39:50 PM10/12/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Nadegda said:
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:34:52 -0700, Stalemate wrote:
>
> > Warning! Always make ANSI approved safety giggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!
> >
> > First, check out what Nadegda said:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:15:04 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As
> >> Ex-FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:37:31 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> > <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:37:58 -0400, Minixie wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:56:35 -0500, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> After serious thinking Minixie wrote :
> >> >>>>> On 12 Oct 2012 00:41:43 GMT, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> In article <16d76g210fztb$.cw361bt8...@40tude.net>, Minixie
> >> >>>>>> <min...@vimbloo.invalid> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:25:41 -0400, Kip Williams wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Minixie wrote, On 10/11/12 5:17 PM:
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:59:34 -0400, Kip Williams wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Minixie wrote, On 10/11/12 12:55 PM:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:35:10 -0400, Kip Williams wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Minixie wrote, On 10/11/12 12:27 PM:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:16:48 -0400, Kip Williams wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minixie wrote, On 10/10/12 6:29 PM:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALL shows eventually jump the shark, usually sooner.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This partakes of the well-known nature of
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generalizations.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Name a show that *didn't* jump the shark, other than
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> because it was canceled before that could happen -- those
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> short-lived shows that either were tragically killed in
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> infancy by network mismanagement (Firefly) or were
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mercy-killed when the network realized that it had been
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> born with its shark pre-jumped (Defying Gravity).
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Even with the pile of qualifications you hastily added,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> "The Simpsons," "South Park," "Fawlty Towers," "Cracker
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> (UK)," "Rocky and Bullwinkle," "The Venture Brothers,"
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> "The Dick Van Dyke Show," "Futurama," and "The Daily Show"
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> come to mind.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Half of those are still running -- they just haven't jumped
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> the shark *yet*.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Oh, another new condition?
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> An obvious one. If a show hasn't jumped the shark, but is
> >> >>>>>>>>> also still airing, it isn't evidence against the proposition
> >> >>>>>>>>> that it will eventually jump the shark.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Some of the rest aren't even scripted shows.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> And yet another new condition? (I'd be interested in knowing
> >> >>>>>>>>>> which of these shows has no writing before they film.)
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Another obvious one. Talk shows and such draw their interest
> >> >>>>>>>>> from guests and real events. Scripted shows, on the other
> >> >>>>>>>>> hand, have a fictional plot that will eventually run out of
> >> >>>>>>>>> ideas.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> So you think Stewart and Colbert just walk out and wing it
> >> >>>>>>>> every night.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> I didn't say that. But the content of their show doesn't come
> >> >>>>>>> from a written story plot that, eventually, gets stale. Instead
> >> >>>>>>> it's based on current events.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I don't see how that follows. There have been plenty of current
> >> >>>>>> events based shows that got stale and were cancelled.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> But not for the reasons that inevitably doom all fictional series
> >> >>>>> eventually.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> What are the reasons that inevitably doom all fictional series
> >> >>>> evenyually, Paul. Oozenet knows Kensi is the expert on the doom
> >> >>>> of fictional series.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Er ... what? Why did you apparently address that question to
> >> >>> yourself? And who is Kensi? Do you mean the NCIS:LA character? That
> >> >>> show doesn't seem especially doomed -- at least, not yet.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Anyway I posted a fuller explanation in another post and I don't
> >> >>> feel like retyping the whole thing.
> >> >>
> >> >>That was Scatboi, one of the more notorious net.kooks presently
> >> >>bubbling away in odd corners of usenet. Unusually for him, he wasn't
> >> >>very scatological in his post, though, as expected from a kook of his
> >> >>calibre, it didn't make any actual sense at all.
> >> >>
> >> >>Scatboi's real name, incidentally, isn't Paul Derbyshire, but rather
> >> >>Danny Serlet.
> >> >>
> >> >>Alt.usenet.kooks added; followups set to rec.arts.tv. I'd suggest you
> >> >>vote for some of Scatboi's kook awards that he's up for for the month
> >> >>of September, but you appear to post via Mixmin and Mixmin blocks
> >> >>posting to auk. I'd suggest instead that you just ignore him.
> >> >>
> >> >>Oh, one more thing -- the kook nymshifts. Look for the combination of
> >> >>X- Newsreader: MesNews and X-ICQ: 543516788 headers, or for
> >> >>attribution lines with a space before the : and changing
> >> >>elaborations, like "so-and- so presented the following explanation :"
> >> >>and later "so-and-so brought next idea :" and so forth, to identify
> >> >>the goon. The From address can't be relied on as he'll not only
> >> >>change names often but often forges people, including me. The three
> >> >>names that he'll sometimes use that nobody else seems to use on
> >> >>usenet are his own, Paul Derbyshire, and Bruce Dollep. The latter two
> >> >>may be real people that he's trying to smear with his antics, or may
> >> >>be fictitious, or one of each.
> >> >
> >> > <echo>
> >> >
> >> > Why are you the only one with an <echo> problem, P<SLAP!>
> >>
> >> Andrew Wilson already spanked you over that incorrect k'lame, kook:
> >>
> >> <k4eg1r$fmn$1...@news.mixmin.net>
> >> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135008454200
> >>
> >> SPNAK!
> >
> > I heard the echo too. You k<SLAP!>
>
> The incorrect k'lame was not that there is an <echo> problem, kook; it
> was that nobody else is experiencing that problem. Try reading for
> comprehension next time.
Search my posts from yesterday, and you'll clearly see that I made a
comment about you, klOOleSS nOObie, posting the same message twice, with
two different mids. Now how do you suppose that happened, klOOleSS
nOObie?
Message-ID: <k5853p$6r6$3...@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <k5854p$ich$1...@dont-email.me>
> Or did you not even bother to read Andrew Wilson's linked-to post before
> presuming to know what was in it? Given your other recent instances of
> admitting to not even bothering to fact-check some of your k'lames before
> stating them, I have to ask.
I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that
out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on
Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy
yet.
<SB-S>
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
____________________________________________________________________
A new revelation from David Keeting the Assworm:
"there's not much you can tell me about the boner that i don't know
already."
Message-ID: <JO6dnTGAR5mq6MPN...@giganews.com>
____________________________________________________________________
Uncle Steve learns about pigs:
<US> How much money have you spent paying off the PIGS?
<CM> The pigs have no use for money. They're content to eat table scraps
and forage for truffles.
<US> I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave.
Regards,
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
____________________________________________________________________
[tard] Phoenix swallows the hook, the line, the sinker, and half of the
pole:
<CM> Watch the stupid cunt ask what 1337 means...
<JD> That is exactly what I am expecting.
<CM> ROT 1337... it'll make you dizzy!
<Tard> Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*,
you Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Even when we warned him first, he still fell for it!
Message-ID: <k3ae35$prb$1...@news.mixmin.net>
_____________________________________________________________________
Checkmate!
First, check out what Nadegda said:
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:34:52 -0700, Stalemate wrote:
>
> > Warning! Always make ANSI approved safety giggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!
> >
> > First, check out what Nadegda said:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:15:04 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As
> >> Ex-FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:37:31 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> > <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:37:58 -0400, Minixie wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:56:35 -0500, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> After serious thinking Minixie wrote :
> >> >>>>> On 12 Oct 2012 00:41:43 GMT, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> In article <16d76g210fztb$.cw361bt8...@40tude.net>, Minixie
> >> >>>>>> <min...@vimbloo.invalid> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:25:41 -0400, Kip Williams wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Minixie wrote, On 10/11/12 5:17 PM:
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:59:34 -0400, Kip Williams wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Minixie wrote, On 10/11/12 12:55 PM:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:35:10 -0400, Kip Williams wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Minixie wrote, On 10/11/12 12:27 PM:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:16:48 -0400, Kip Williams wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minixie wrote, On 10/10/12 6:29 PM:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALL shows eventually jump the shark, usually sooner.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This partakes of the well-known nature of
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generalizations.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Name a show that *didn't* jump the shark, other than
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> because it was canceled before that could happen -- those
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> short-lived shows that either were tragically killed in
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> infancy by network mismanagement (Firefly) or were
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mercy-killed when the network realized that it had been
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> born with its shark pre-jumped (Defying Gravity).
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Even with the pile of qualifications you hastily added,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> "The Simpsons," "South Park," "Fawlty Towers," "Cracker
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> (UK)," "Rocky and Bullwinkle," "The Venture Brothers,"
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> "The Dick Van Dyke Show," "Futurama," and "The Daily Show"
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> come to mind.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Half of those are still running -- they just haven't jumped
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> the shark *yet*.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Oh, another new condition?
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> An obvious one. If a show hasn't jumped the shark, but is
> >> >>>>>>>>> also still airing, it isn't evidence against the proposition
> >> >>>>>>>>> that it will eventually jump the shark.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Some of the rest aren't even scripted shows.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> And yet another new condition? (I'd be interested in knowing
> >> >>>>>>>>>> which of these shows has no writing before they film.)
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Another obvious one. Talk shows and such draw their interest
> >> >>>>>>>>> from guests and real events. Scripted shows, on the other
> >> >>>>>>>>> hand, have a fictional plot that will eventually run out of
> >> >>>>>>>>> ideas.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> So you think Stewart and Colbert just walk out and wing it
> >> >>>>>>>> every night.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> I didn't say that. But the content of their show doesn't come
> >> >>>>>>> from a written story plot that, eventually, gets stale. Instead
> >> >>>>>>> it's based on current events.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I don't see how that follows. There have been plenty of current
> >> >>>>>> events based shows that got stale and were cancelled.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> But not for the reasons that inevitably doom all fictional series
> >> >>>>> eventually.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> What are the reasons that inevitably doom all fictional series
> >> >>>> evenyually, Paul. Oozenet knows Kensi is the expert on the doom
> >> >>>> of fictional series.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Er ... what? Why did you apparently address that question to
> >> >>> yourself? And who is Kensi? Do you mean the NCIS:LA character? That
> >> >>> show doesn't seem especially doomed -- at least, not yet.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Anyway I posted a fuller explanation in another post and I don't
> >> >>> feel like retyping the whole thing.
> >> >>
> >> >>That was Scatboi, one of the more notorious net.kooks presently
> >> >>bubbling away in odd corners of usenet. Unusually for him, he wasn't
> >> >>very scatological in his post, though, as expected from a kook of his
> >> >>calibre, it didn't make any actual sense at all.
> >> >>
> >> >>Scatboi's real name, incidentally, isn't Paul Derbyshire, but rather
> >> >>Danny Serlet.
> >> >>
> >> >>Alt.usenet.kooks added; followups set to rec.arts.tv. I'd suggest you
> >> >>vote for some of Scatboi's kook awards that he's up for for the month
> >> >>of September, but you appear to post via Mixmin and Mixmin blocks
> >> >>posting to auk. I'd suggest instead that you just ignore him.
> >> >>
> >> >>Oh, one more thing -- the kook nymshifts. Look for the combination of
> >> >>X- Newsreader: MesNews and X-ICQ: 543516788 headers, or for
> >> >>attribution lines with a space before the : and changing
> >> >>elaborations, like "so-and- so presented the following explanation :"
> >> >>and later "so-and-so brought next idea :" and so forth, to identify
> >> >>the goon. The From address can't be relied on as he'll not only
> >> >>change names often but often forges people, including me. The three
> >> >>names that he'll sometimes use that nobody else seems to use on
> >> >>usenet are his own, Paul Derbyshire, and Bruce Dollep. The latter two
> >> >>may be real people that he's trying to smear with his antics, or may
> >> >>be fictitious, or one of each.
> >> >
> >> > <echo>
> >> >
> >> > Why are you the only one with an <echo> problem, P<SLAP!>
> >>
> >> Andrew Wilson already spanked you over that incorrect k'lame, kook:
> >>
> >> <k4eg1r$fmn$1...@news.mixmin.net>
> >> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135008454200
> >>
> >> SPNAK!
> >
> > I heard the echo too. You k<SLAP!>
>
> The incorrect k'lame was not that there is an <echo> problem, kook; it
> was that nobody else is experiencing that problem. Try reading for
> comprehension next time.
Search my posts from yesterday, and you'll clearly see that I made a
comment about you, klOOleSS nOObie, posting the same message twice, with
two different mids. Now how do you suppose that happened, klOOleSS
nOObie?
Message-ID: <k5853p$6r6$3...@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <k5854p$ich$1...@dont-email.me>
> Or did you not even bother to read Andrew Wilson's linked-to post before
> presuming to know what was in it? Given your other recent instances of
> admitting to not even bothering to fact-check some of your k'lames before
> stating them, I have to ask.
I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that
out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on
Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy
yet.
<SB-S>
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
____________________________________________________________________
A new revelation from David Keeting the Assworm:
"there's not much you can tell me about the boner that i don't know
already."
Message-ID: <JO6dnTGAR5mq6MPN...@giganews.com>
____________________________________________________________________
Uncle Steve learns about pigs:
<US> How much money have you spent paying off the PIGS?
<CM> The pigs have no use for money. They're content to eat table scraps
and forage for truffles.
<US> I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave.
Regards,
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
____________________________________________________________________
[tard] Phoenix swallows the hook, the line, the sinker, and half of the
pole:
<CM> Watch the stupid cunt ask what 1337 means...
<JD> That is exactly what I am expecting.
<CM> ROT 1337... it'll make you dizzy!
<Tard> Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*,
you Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Even when we warned him first, he still fell for it!
Message-ID: <k3ae35$prb$1...@news.mixmin.net>
_____________________________________________________________________
Checkmate
Oct 12, 2012, 8:55:02 PM10/12/12
to
> > Or did you not even bother to read Andrew Wilson's linked-to post before
> > presuming to know what was in it? Given your other recent instances of
> > admitting to not even bothering to fact-check some of your k'lames
> > before stating them, I have to ask.
>
> And other people are continuing to have the problem, as exemplified by
> > presuming to know what was in it? Given your other recent instances of
> > admitting to not even bothering to fact-check some of your k'lames
> > before stating them, I have to ask.
>
> this:
>
> <k5a960$t6s$1...@dont-email.me>
> <k5a9a3$t5u$1...@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <k5853p$6r6$3...@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <k5854p$ich$1...@dont-email.me>
LOLs...
lols... <---echo
> Ryk E. Spoor is a moderately well known published science fiction author.
Who the fuck cares, Paul?
Checkmate
Oct 13, 2012, 12:00:57 AM10/13/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Nadegda said:
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:48:02 -0700, Stalemate wrote:
>
> > Warning! Always make ANSI approved safety giggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!
> >
> > First, check out what kensi said:
Checkmate!
First, check out what Nadegda said:
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:48:02 -0700, Stalemate wrote:
>
> > Warning! Always make ANSI approved safety giggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 12/10/2012 10:36 PM, Fred Hall wrote:
> >> > Eventually. Kensi did a bad, bad thing.
> >>
> >> Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
> >>
> >> *snicker*
> >>
> >> *gone again now -- adios, kOok*
> >
> > Oh, you definitely did a bad, bad thing. I just saw it on Youtube:
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
>
> That's ... really, really lame, Stalemate.
>
> <snicker>
I'll tell her... after she finishes my banana lickity split.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 13, 2012, 12:59:34 AM10/13/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
> I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that
> out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on
> Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy
> yet.
Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
I've made 137 posts for October to date, excluding tonight's posts
(which you've not had a chance to reply to yet, as they've just been
sent). The MIDs of my posts in which you'd replied to me:
k4dq13$hvk$2...@news.mixmin.net k4dq1b$hvv$2...@news.mixmin.net
k4dr4o$jeg$1...@news.mixmin.net k4drpm$k63$1...@news.mixmin.net
k4dsc7$l32$1...@news.mixmin.net k4eo3k$sos$2...@news.mixmin.net
k4gfk0$ea6$2...@news.mixmin.net k4isd9$rv2$1...@news.mixmin.net
k4isdl$rv2$2...@news.mixmin.net k4itar$suk$1...@news.mixmin.net
k4itj5$t5h$1...@news.mixmin.net k4k060$ae4$3...@news.mixmin.net
k4k060$ae5$3...@news.mixmin.net k4lh68$p93$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4llgl$qe7$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4o74r$1qu$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4o76b$1qu$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4o77q$1qu$5...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4pfl4$ot9$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4pfl9$ot4$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4qsvl$o9n$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4qsvs$o9n$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4tfno$en$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4ur0s$k4t$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4ur0r$k4u$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k508l2$7db$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k508l5$7da$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k514ic$m1r$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k51r6c$2pn$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k51r6c$2po$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k51r6f$2pn$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k52oal$ece$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k52oaq$ecd$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k52ob0$ece$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k53puk$u8e$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k53pum$u8f$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k53pun$u8e$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k55854$r54$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k55857$r54$5...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k56c83$9b1$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k57sm7$1kr$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k59333$kkc$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k59336$kkd$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k59336$kkc$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k59338$kkc$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
(45 / 137) * 100 = 32.85% actual response rate vs. your claimed 10%.
I used my posts, so it was clear you were responding to me *and*
reading what I wrote, contrary to your k'lame. You're replying to
nearly every post I make that's directed at you. In short, I pwn you.
And I've now proven you can't calculate percentages.
Just so you know... you're at 935 posts for October to date (an
average of 77.92 posts per day (163 yesterday, 107 today... so you're
screeding far above even your higher than normal one-month rate, which
is 2.614 times your historical rate), putting you on track to have
your third screediest month ever), and you've now broken the 14
minutes between posts barrier. Autofroth much, kook?
How's that crappy less-than-minimum-wage job with no benefits going,
fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Getting a lot of work done? No?
That's alright... you're sucking hard at the welfare teat, eh? No need
to work when you're a fat lazy dole bludging layabout like you.
SPNAK!
Yeah, yeah, yeah... text-wall. Spanking you sometimes requires
actually typing something other than the truthy phrase "fat retarded
drug-addicted chimp".
<snicker>
--
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Kook Awards Official Voting Ballot:
Message-ID: <k4b1ce$j4k$2...@news.mixmin.net>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134906097300
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/dd05de54d25966a4
Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
> I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that
> out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on
> Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy
> yet.
don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
I've made 137 posts for October to date, excluding tonight's posts
(which you've not had a chance to reply to yet, as they've just been
sent). The MIDs of my posts in which you'd replied to me:
k4dq13$hvk$2...@news.mixmin.net k4dq1b$hvv$2...@news.mixmin.net
k4dr4o$jeg$1...@news.mixmin.net k4drpm$k63$1...@news.mixmin.net
k4dsc7$l32$1...@news.mixmin.net k4eo3k$sos$2...@news.mixmin.net
k4gfk0$ea6$2...@news.mixmin.net k4isd9$rv2$1...@news.mixmin.net
k4isdl$rv2$2...@news.mixmin.net k4itar$suk$1...@news.mixmin.net
k4itj5$t5h$1...@news.mixmin.net k4k060$ae4$3...@news.mixmin.net
k4k060$ae5$3...@news.mixmin.net k4lh68$p93$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4llgl$qe7$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4o74r$1qu$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4o76b$1qu$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4o77q$1qu$5...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4pfl4$ot9$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4pfl9$ot4$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4qsvl$o9n$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4qsvs$o9n$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4tfno$en$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4ur0s$k4t$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k4ur0r$k4u$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k508l2$7db$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k508l5$7da$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k514ic$m1r$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k51r6c$2pn$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k51r6c$2po$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k51r6f$2pn$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k52oal$ece$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k52oaq$ecd$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k52ob0$ece$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k53puk$u8e$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k53pum$u8f$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k53pun$u8e$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k55854$r54$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k55857$r54$5...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k56c83$9b1$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k57sm7$1kr$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k59333$kkc$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k59336$kkd$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k59336$kkc$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
k59338$kkc$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
(45 / 137) * 100 = 32.85% actual response rate vs. your claimed 10%.
I used my posts, so it was clear you were responding to me *and*
reading what I wrote, contrary to your k'lame. You're replying to
nearly every post I make that's directed at you. In short, I pwn you.
And I've now proven you can't calculate percentages.
Just so you know... you're at 935 posts for October to date (an
average of 77.92 posts per day (163 yesterday, 107 today... so you're
screeding far above even your higher than normal one-month rate, which
is 2.614 times your historical rate), putting you on track to have
your third screediest month ever), and you've now broken the 14
minutes between posts barrier. Autofroth much, kook?
How's that crappy less-than-minimum-wage job with no benefits going,
fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Getting a lot of work done? No?
That's alright... you're sucking hard at the welfare teat, eh? No need
to work when you're a fat lazy dole bludging layabout like you.
SPNAK!
Yeah, yeah, yeah... text-wall. Spanking you sometimes requires
actually typing something other than the truthy phrase "fat retarded
drug-addicted chimp".
<snicker>
--
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Kook Awards Official Voting Ballot:
Message-ID: <k4b1ce$j4k$2...@news.mixmin.net>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134906097300
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/dd05de54d25966a4
Checkmate
Oct 13, 2012, 2:28:21 AM10/13/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Checkmate!
said:
>
> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>
> > I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that
> > out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on
> > Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy
> > yet.
>
> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them. See, this is
like golf. The LOWEST score wins. I type a few lines, and you barf up a
whole pile of steaming screed. I skim through a few lines, usually, then
poke you again. I keep telling you, Paul... you still don't "get" how
the game is played, but you came to the right place to learn.
Checkmate
Oct 13, 2012, 3:51:11 AM10/13/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Sn!pe said:
Checkmate!
>
> [rat dropped]
>
> Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:35:40 -0400, kensi
> > <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > >On 12/10/2012 10:36 PM, Fred Hall wrote:
> > >> Eventually. Kensi did a bad, bad thing.
> > >
> > >Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
> > >
> > >*snicker*
> > >
> > >*gone again now -- adios, kOok*
> >
> > Famous last words, Paul.
> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:35:40 -0400, kensi
> > <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > >On 12/10/2012 10:36 PM, Fred Hall wrote:
> > >> Eventually. Kensi did a bad, bad thing.
> > >
> > >Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
> > >
> > >*snicker*
> > >
> > >*gone again now -- adios, kOok*
> >
>
> Has he gone? What will we do for fun now?
Wait for one of his socks to come along.
Message has been deleted
Checkmate
Oct 13, 2012, 4:09:50 AM10/13/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Sn!pe said:
>
> Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote:
>
> > > > >Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
> > > > >
> > > > >*snicker*
> > > > >
> > > > >*gone again now -- adios, kOok*
> > > >
> > > > Famous last words, Paul.
> > >
> > > Has he gone? What will we do for fun now?
> >
> > Wait for one of his socks to come along.
>
> One thing that I've noticed in the short time that I've been
Checkmate!
First, check out what Sn!pe said:
>
> Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote:
>
> > > > >Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
> > > > >
> > > > >*snicker*
> > > > >
> > > > >*gone again now -- adios, kOok*
> > > >
> > > > Famous last words, Paul.
> > >
> > > Has he gone? What will we do for fun now?
> >
> > Wait for one of his socks to come along.
>
> here frolicking with the auks: Paul's socks are just like buses -
> there are none for hours, then three or four come along together.
It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same
stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright
uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
"I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*, you
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Message-ID: <k3ae35$prb$1...@news.mixmin.net>
_____________________________________________________________________
%
Oct 13, 2012, 10:49:55 AM10/13/12
to
pandora
Oct 13, 2012, 3:51:44 PM10/13/12
to
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:28:21 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>
>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>
>> > I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring
>> > that out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp
>> > on Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader
>> > thingy yet.
>>
>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
>
> Oh, I click on most of them and answer quite a few. I just don't bother
> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them. See, this is
> like golf. The LOWEST score wins. I type a few lines, and you barf up
> a whole pile of steaming screed. I skim through a few lines, usually,
> then poke you again. I keep telling you, Paul... you still don't "get"
> how the game is played, but you came to the right place to learn.
>
Him learn? Shirly you jest!
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>
>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>
>> > I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring
>> > that out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp
>> > on Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader
>> > thingy yet.
>>
>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
>
> Oh, I click on most of them and answer quite a few. I just don't bother
> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them. See, this is
> like golf. The LOWEST score wins. I type a few lines, and you barf up
> a whole pile of steaming screed. I skim through a few lines, usually,
> then poke you again. I keep telling you, Paul... you still don't "get"
> how the game is played, but you came to the right place to learn.
>
Nadegda
Oct 13, 2012, 8:50:31 PM10/13/12
to
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:57:32 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
> Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote:
>
>> > > >Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
>> > > >
>> > > >*snicker*
>> > > >
>> > > >*gone again now -- adios, kOok*
>> > >
>> > > Famous last words, Paul.
>> >
>> > Has he gone? What will we do for fun now?
>>
>> Wait for one of his socks to come along.
>
different times -- partly different habits, partly different time zones.
I post typically starting around 4:30-5:00pm, because that's when I get
off work. Andrew tends to post much later -- maybe he works shifts?
Phoenix posts most often around 8-10pm -- I guess he waits until after
dinner, unlike me, though I may post another batch after I eat. And kensi
tends to post earlier than I do by a few hours, around noonish, though
sometimes another batch in the early evening. She's three time zones east
of me, though, so it's mid-afternoon her time for the first batch and
late evening for the second. So, a batch during some sort of afternoon
break(?) and a batch after dinner for her. (I don't know what exactly
being an astrophysicist entails, but I guess it's not strictly nine-to-
five.)
The one thing we most have in common: reading and posting news for a bit
after dinner. And even then kensi does it earlier than Phoenix and I do
because of the time zone difference.
As for why our posting times are mostly the same on the weekend as during
the week? Force of habit, I guess. At least that's what it is in my case.
(You can dig up past posts by the Tetrarchy's four members and plot their
times in a histogram or something if you don't believe me.)
> Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote:
>
>> > > >Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
>> > > >
>> > > >*snicker*
>> > > >
>> > > >*gone again now -- adios, kOok*
>> > >
>> > > Famous last words, Paul.
>> >
>> > Has he gone? What will we do for fun now?
>>
>> Wait for one of his socks to come along.
>
> One thing that I've noticed in the short time that I've been here
> frolicking with the auks: Paul's socks are just like buses - there are
> none for hours, then three or four come along together.
The separate people that you think of as "Paul's socks" post at quite
> frolicking with the auks: Paul's socks are just like buses - there are
> none for hours, then three or four come along together.
different times -- partly different habits, partly different time zones.
I post typically starting around 4:30-5:00pm, because that's when I get
off work. Andrew tends to post much later -- maybe he works shifts?
Phoenix posts most often around 8-10pm -- I guess he waits until after
dinner, unlike me, though I may post another batch after I eat. And kensi
tends to post earlier than I do by a few hours, around noonish, though
sometimes another batch in the early evening. She's three time zones east
of me, though, so it's mid-afternoon her time for the first batch and
late evening for the second. So, a batch during some sort of afternoon
break(?) and a batch after dinner for her. (I don't know what exactly
being an astrophysicist entails, but I guess it's not strictly nine-to-
five.)
The one thing we most have in common: reading and posting news for a bit
after dinner. And even then kensi does it earlier than Phoenix and I do
because of the time zone difference.
As for why our posting times are mostly the same on the weekend as during
the week? Force of habit, I guess. At least that's what it is in my case.
(You can dig up past posts by the Tetrarchy's four members and plot their
times in a histogram or something if you don't believe me.)
Nadegda
Oct 13, 2012, 8:56:56 PM10/13/12
to
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:28:21 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>
>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>
>> > I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring
>> > that out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp
>> > on Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader
>> > thingy yet.
>>
>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
>
> Oh, I click on most of them and answer quite a few. I just don't bother
> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them. See, this is
> like golf. The LOWEST score wins. I type a few lines, and you barf up
> a whole pile of steaming screed. I skim through a few lines, usually,
> then poke you again. I keep telling you, Paul... you still don't "get"
> how the game is played, but you came to the right place to learn.
No, we of the Tetrarchy do not *care* what game *you* are playing, beyond
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>
>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>
>> > I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring
>> > that out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp
>> > on Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader
>> > thingy yet.
>>
>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
>
> Oh, I click on most of them and answer quite a few. I just don't bother
> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them. See, this is
> like golf. The LOWEST score wins. I type a few lines, and you barf up
> a whole pile of steaming screed. I skim through a few lines, usually,
> then poke you again. I keep telling you, Paul... you still don't "get"
> how the game is played, but you came to the right place to learn.
the fact that it is kooky. What *we* do is find logical inconsistencies
and other kookiness on *your* part and prove these things before a
worldwide audience. Sometimes it takes only a line of text to do so; but
sometimes it takes a page of reasoning to explain one of the holes in
your "logic".
And there's also the minor little matter that you've recently been
posting more, both by post count and by line count, than all four
Tetrarchy members combined. So you're losing by your own "game"'s "rules"
*as well as* by ours.
<snicker>
Checkmate
Oct 13, 2012, 9:03:15 PM10/13/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Checkmate!
of text were in Kensi's post that you quoted? You know... the one where
YOU insisted that you had spanked ME? Are you going to follow the habits
of Mr. Hand and insist on trying to backpedal out of that particular...
what did you call it? Oh, yeah... that "bear trap" you thought you set
for me? Go ahead... make my day. Show me you can count to ten. Hint:
you have at least that many fingers (unless you've been in some sort of
industrial accident or something).
<chortle> <smirk>
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
My name is Checkmate, and I approve this message...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
"I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*, you
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Checkmate
Oct 13, 2012, 9:19:57 PM10/13/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Checkmate!
and why you don't count them as lines of text when they contain text?
You may begin your backpedal here:
> And there's also the minor little matter that you've recently been
> posting more, both by post count and by line count, than all four
> Tetrarchy members combined. So you're losing by your own "game"'s "rules"
> *as well as* by ours.
>
> <snicker>
had one line of text and three lines of "non-blank" text? I counted ten.
Is that why you snipped it from your later reply? Are you unable to
count to ten, just like the "hand" that feeds you, Sockzilla?
Please insert your backpedal here:
<HoT, bay-beeeeeee!>
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
My name is Checkmate, and I approve this message...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
"I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*, you
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
%
Oct 13, 2012, 11:39:37 PM10/13/12
to
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 14, 2012, 12:46:16 AM10/14/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Checkmate, in <news:617t58.a...@news.alt.net> did thusly write at
1:09:50 AM PST:
> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same
> stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright
> uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves
enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you
can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over
again.
Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement
plan.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 14, 2012, 12:47:32 AM10/14/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Checkmate, in <news:617n6u....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>
>>> I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that
>>> out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on
>>> Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy
>>> yet.
>>
>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
>>
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>
>>> I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that
>>> out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on
>>> Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy
>>> yet.
>>
>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
>>
> Oh, I click on most of them and answer quite a few. I just don't bother
> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them.
Which is why in the posts outlined above, you've replied point by
> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them.
point, right? You lying piece of shit who's now backpedaling furiously
in trying to escape yet another bootfuck.
> See, this is like golf.
most damage to their opponents while pushing their line of scrimmage
down the field the farthest wins. Which means you're getting crushed.
> The LOWEST score wins. I type a few lines, and you barf up a
> whole pile of steaming screed. I skim through a few lines, usually, then
> poke you again. I keep telling you, Paul... you still don't "get" how
> the game is played, but you came to the right place to learn.
game. You brought golf clubs to a football game.
But you're still getting spanked silly, fat retarded drug-addicted
chimp. We're at your 5 yard line, half your defensive line is injured
out, half of them are playing with concussions, and we're just about
to score yet another touchdown.
Checkmate
Oct 14, 2012, 1:45:26 AM10/14/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Checkmate!
First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
said:
>
said:
>
> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Checkmate, in <news:617t58.a...@news.alt.net> did thusly write at
> 1:09:50 AM PST:
>
> > It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same
> > stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright
> > uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
>
> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>
> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
>
> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves
> enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you
> can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over
> again.
>
> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement
> plan.
>
> <snicker>
Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger. I have no plans
>
> Checkmate, in <news:617t58.a...@news.alt.net> did thusly write at
> 1:09:50 AM PST:
>
> > It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same
> > stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright
> > uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
>
> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>
> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
>
> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves
> enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you
> can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over
> again.
>
> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement
> plan.
>
> <snicker>
to retire any time soon. I like what I'm doing, and my customers like
what I'm doing.
Checkmate
Oct 14, 2012, 1:49:56 AM10/14/12
to
posts and support your claim that I've replied point by point in every
one of them. Post your proof here, bitch, and be quick about it.
> right? You lying piece of shit who's now backpedaling furiously
> in trying to escape yet another bootfuck.
corner I helped her paint herself into.
> > See, this is like golf.
>
> This is nothing like golf.
sake.
<chortle>
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
My name is Checkmate, and I approve this message...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
"I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*, you
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Nadegda
Oct 14, 2012, 1:59:18 AM10/14/12
to
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 22:45:26 -0700, Stalemate wrote:
> Warning! Always make ANSI approved safety giggles when reading posts by
<snicker>
> Warning! Always make ANSI approved safety giggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
>> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
>> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement
>> plan.
>>
>> <snicker>
>
> Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger.
Oooh, touched a nerve, did he?
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
>> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
>> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement
>> plan.
>>
>> <snicker>
>
> Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger.
<snicker>
Checkmate
Oct 14, 2012, 2:24:08 AM10/14/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
How many lines was that Kensi post, and what are "non-blank" lines?
Checkmate!
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 14, 2012, 9:51:55 AM10/14/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
screed swamp that's in them", so the impetus is upon you to prove your
k'lame, kook. I've already disproven your k'lame of ignoring 90% of my
posts, the evidence is directly above.
But I see you're replying point by point in your reply now... kind of
makes your kooky k'lames seem... kooky, eh?
Post your proof that you haven't been replying point by point here,
bitch, and be quick about it.
<snicker>
>> right? You lying piece of shit who's now backpedaling furiously
>> in trying to escape yet another bootfuck.
>
> You wanna see a good backpedal? Let's see how Nadiggah gets out of the
> corner I helped her paint herself into.
effeminate and weak it'd be laughable if you weren't so pathetic.
>>> See, this is like golf.
>>
>> This is nothing like golf.
>
> Did... did you just try to argue with me, kOOk? I'm winning, for fuck's
> sake.
around.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 14, 2012, 9:51:58 AM10/14/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Checkmate, in <news:61a92e....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:617t58.a...@news.alt.net> did thusly write at
>> 1:09:50 AM PST:
>>
>>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same
>>> stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright
>>> uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
>>
>> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>>
>> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
>>
>> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves
>> enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you
>> can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over
>> again.
>>
>> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
>> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
>> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement
>> plan.
>>
>> <snicker>
Above is where I touched a nerve.
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:617t58.a...@news.alt.net> did thusly write at
>> 1:09:50 AM PST:
>>
>>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same
>>> stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright
>>> uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
>>
>> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>>
>> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
>>
>> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves
>> enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you
>> can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over
>> again.
>>
>> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
>> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
>> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement
>> plan.
>>
>> <snicker>
Below is where you cry out in pain.
> Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger. I have no plans
> to retire any time soon. I like what I'm doing, and my customers like
> what I'm doing.
<snicker>
The only customers who like what you're doing are doing you:
k52oab$ecd$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
<guffaw>
Checkmate
Oct 14, 2012, 11:14:05 AM10/14/12
to
> so the impetus is upon you to prove
> your
> k'lame, kook. I've already disproven your k'lame of ignoring 90% of my
> posts, the evidence is directly above.
> But I see you're replying point by point in your reply now... kind of
> makes your kooky k'lames seem... kooky, eh?
> Post your proof that you haven't been replying point by point here,
> bitch, and be quick about it.
> <snicker>
>
> >> right? You lying piece of shit who's now backpedaling furiously
> >> in trying to escape yet another bootfuck.
> >
> > You wanna see a good backpedal? Let's see how Nadiggah gets out of the
> > corner I helped her paint herself into.
>
> You've been reduced to grammar lames. You're so ineffectual,
> effeminate and weak it'd be laughable if you weren't so pathetic.
Oh, and tell that sock-bitch of yours to quit running from S/H/IT's
spank... it's not going to go away any time soon. I want to see many
"non-blank" lines explaining how a ten-line post is really a one-line
post. It seems that none of your socks can count or do simple math any
better than you do.
> >>> See, this is like golf.
> >>
> >> This is nothing like golf.
> >
> > Did... did you just try to argue with me, kOOk? I'm winning, for fuck's
> > sake.
>
> No, you're not. Not in real life, not on usenet. You're a loser all
> around.
you were a loser all your life. That's why you attempt to find solace in
your imaginary perfect world. It's also why you're such a bitter,
humorless, maladjusted, slimy little shit stain. Have a nice day...
Checkmate
Oct 14, 2012, 11:32:06 AM10/14/12
to
> Below is where you cry out in pain.
perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me now.
She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she can't own
up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky Andrew
around lately either, and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to
be in this anymore. You've got a little more staying power, but that's
just your over-inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a
WINNER, for fuck's sake! It's not going to happen, Paula... just like
all the other failures in your pathetic life. The way I see it, you're
just a rifle and a bell tower away from making the evening news as it is.
Do me a favor though, Paula... when you go completely berserk, assuming
the cops don't cap your sorry ass right on the spot, don't put the blame
on me, emkay? We're just having a little fun.
> > Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger. I have no plans
> > to retire any time soon. I like what I'm doing, and my customers like
> > what I'm doing.
>
> Those making less than minimum wage are seldom able to retire.
> <snicker>
>
> The only customers who like what you're doing are doing you:
> k52oab$ecd$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>
> <guffaw>
--
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Nadegda
Oct 14, 2012, 9:22:25 PM10/14/12
to
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:32:06 -0700, Stalemate wrote:
> Warning! Always make ANSI approved safety giggles when reading posts by
Talking to your imaginary girlfriend again, kook? You really shouldn't do
that in public -- only in your bedroom with the curtains drawn and your
washcloth'o'shame at the ready. Don't forget to give "Paula" some TLC
with your bicycle pump first.
>> Below is where you cry out in pain.
>
> Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary
> perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me
> now.
Apparently, replying occasionally to your kooky posts to poke you into
spinning some more constitutes "hiding" now. Interesting. Have you
redefined any *other* words of the English language? You've got a ways to
go at that before you can catch up to Murphy and win a Goofy Azzed Baboon
Award, given his giant head start.
> She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she
> can't own up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen
> socky Andrew around lately either
I don't know any "socky Andrew", but Andrew Wilson made a handful of
posts several hours before you wrote the above, so I'll take it as your
tacit admission that Andrew Wilson is not a sock.
> and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to be in this anymore.
I think she's got someone new in her life, hence her near-absence the
last several weekends. But she's still quite active during the week.
Aren't you paying attention to what goes on around here, kook?
> You've got a little more staying power, but that's just your over-
> inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a WINNER, for fuck's
> sake!
He's already WON, for fuck's sake! Ferd's on the run and his lame "kook
awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
just to make them appear to still be a going concern. It's the inflatable
rubber doll of "kook awards" now. Of course, you'd know all about
inflatable rubber dolls, wouldn't you, kooky?
> It's not going to happen, Paula...
Aww, did you disappoint your inflatable girlfriend again, kooky? Maybe
try one of those blue diamond-shaped pills next time. But I doubt that
will do it either. We all know the *real* reason you can't get it up for
"Paula" ... she just doesn't turn you on like Antonio Inflatus does.
<snicker>
> just like all the other failures in your pathetic life. The
> way I see it, you're just a rifle and a bell tower away from making the
> evening news as it is.
How disturbing. Have you discussed your violent fantasies with the good
doctor yet, Stalemate?
> Do me a favor though, Paula... when you go completely berserk, assuming
> the cops don't cap your sorry ass right on the spot, don't put the
> blame on me, emkay? We're just having a little fun.
I thought you had enough experience with them by now to know that blow-up
dolls only go berserk *after* you puncture them. That's when they zoom
off and fly around in circles near the ceiling before falling, all limp
and useless, on your head.
> Warning! Always make ANSI approved safety giggles when reading posts by
that in public -- only in your bedroom with the curtains drawn and your
washcloth'o'shame at the ready. Don't forget to give "Paula" some TLC
with your bicycle pump first.
>> Below is where you cry out in pain.
>
> Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary
> perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me
> now.
spinning some more constitutes "hiding" now. Interesting. Have you
redefined any *other* words of the English language? You've got a ways to
go at that before you can catch up to Murphy and win a Goofy Azzed Baboon
Award, given his giant head start.
> She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she
> can't own up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen
> socky Andrew around lately either
posts several hours before you wrote the above, so I'll take it as your
tacit admission that Andrew Wilson is not a sock.
> and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to be in this anymore.
last several weekends. But she's still quite active during the week.
Aren't you paying attention to what goes on around here, kook?
> You've got a little more staying power, but that's just your over-
> inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a WINNER, for fuck's
> sake!
awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
just to make them appear to still be a going concern. It's the inflatable
rubber doll of "kook awards" now. Of course, you'd know all about
inflatable rubber dolls, wouldn't you, kooky?
> It's not going to happen, Paula...
try one of those blue diamond-shaped pills next time. But I doubt that
will do it either. We all know the *real* reason you can't get it up for
"Paula" ... she just doesn't turn you on like Antonio Inflatus does.
<snicker>
> just like all the other failures in your pathetic life. The
> way I see it, you're just a rifle and a bell tower away from making the
> evening news as it is.
doctor yet, Stalemate?
> Do me a favor though, Paula... when you go completely berserk, assuming
> the cops don't cap your sorry ass right on the spot, don't put the
> blame on me, emkay? We're just having a little fun.
dolls only go berserk *after* you puncture them. That's when they zoom
off and fly around in circles near the ceiling before falling, all limp
and useless, on your head.
Checkmate
Oct 14, 2012, 9:45:38 PM10/14/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Checkmate!
Every time you see a post from me that says "Hi. Come here often?", it's
in response to one of the many mystery socks that show up just in time to
vote in your rigged phony elections.
Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you
claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a ten-
line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line" follow-
up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically turned ten
lines into one, you not only deleted all of the incriminating text in
your reply, you invented something that you call "non-blank lines".
You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. You
may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every time just
how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me, Nadiggah... just what
are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count to ten?
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 14, 2012, 10:11:58 PM10/14/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> Below is where you cry out in pain.
>
> Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary
> perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me now.
> She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she can't own
> up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky Andrew
> around lately either, and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to
> be in this anymore. You've got a little more staying power, but that's
> just your over-inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a
> WINNER, for fuck's sake! It's not going to happen, Paula... just like
> all the other failures in your pathetic life. The way I see it, you're
> just a rifle and a bell tower away from making the evening news as it is.
> Do me a favor though, Paula... when you go completely berserk, assuming
> the cops don't cap your sorry ass right on the spot, don't put the blame
> on me, emkay? We're just having a little fun.
I'm winning, for fuck's sake!
Nadegda will post at her usual time, and spank you silly.
Andrew Wilson just posted last night.
Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
But do keep reading into things your wishful thinking and desperate
hopes, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp, as we spank you to blisters.
<snicker>
>>> Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger. I have no plans
>>> to retire any time soon. I like what I'm doing, and my customers like
>>> what I'm doing.
>>
>> Those making less than minimum wage are seldom able to retire.
>> <snicker>
>>
>> The only customers who like what you're doing are doing you:
>> k52oab$ecd$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>
>> <guffaw>
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 14, 2012, 10:12:02 PM10/14/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
your k'lame that you're not replying point by point, doesn't it.
<snicker>
>> so the impetus is upon you to prove
>
> No, it's not.
reality, you'll have to back up that claim.
>> your
>> k'lame, kook. I've already disproven your k'lame of ignoring 90% of my
>
> No, you haven't.
<snicker>
>> posts, the evidence is directly above.
>
> No, it isn't.
>> But I see you're replying point by point in your reply now... kind of
>> makes your kooky k'lames seem... kooky, eh?
>
> No, it doesn't. This is one post out of many.
<snicker>
>> Post your proof that you haven't been replying point by point here,
>> bitch, and be quick about it.
>
> Get stuffed, Paul... and be quick about it.
retarded drug-addicted chimp.
>> <snicker>
>>
>>>> right? You lying piece of shit who's now backpedaling furiously
>>>> in trying to escape yet another bootfuck.
>>>
>>> You wanna see a good backpedal? Let's see how Nadiggah gets out of the
>>> corner I helped her paint herself into.
>>
>> You've been reduced to grammar lames. You're so ineffectual,
>> effeminate and weak it'd be laughable if you weren't so pathetic.
>
> Kindly point out the alleged grammar lame in this post, Paul. Do it now.
> Oh, and tell that sock-bitch of yours to quit running from S/H/IT's
> spank...
referenced again. Of course, your poor reading comprehension skills
mean that you can't even understand what you wrote, so we're not
surprised that you're arguing against yourself. Again.
> it's not going to go away any time soon. I want to see many
> "non-blank" lines explaining how a ten-line post is really a one-line
> post. It seems that none of your socks can count or do simple math any
> better than you do.
<snicker>
>>>>> See, this is like golf.
>>>>
>>>> This is nothing like golf.
>>>
>>> Did... did you just try to argue with me, kOOk? I'm winning, for fuck's
>>> sake.
>>
>> No, you're not. Not in real life, not on usenet. You're a loser all
>> around.
>
> I know it would comfort you to think that. After all, you've been told
> you were a loser all your life. That's why you attempt to find solace in
> your imaginary perfect world. It's also why you're such a bitter,
> humorless, maladjusted, slimy little shit stain. Have a nice day...
and night, you've got a screeding record to break.
<guffaw>
Fred Hall
Oct 14, 2012, 9:59:44 PM10/14/12
to
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> "kook
>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
>stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot,
<nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> "kook
>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
>stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
Paul?
Apparently you were confused when you posted the above.
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." -
Nellie Hall
KotAGoR XXXXI
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer of Rasta Khan, March 2006
Pierre Salinger HL&S January & February 2012
Checkmate
Oct 14, 2012, 11:06:24 PM10/14/12
to
<Did you like that PEE-WEE. Paula?>
> >> Below is where you cry out in pain.
> >
> > Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary
> > perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me now.
> > She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she can't own
> > up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky Andrew
> > around lately either, and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to
> > be in this anymore. You've got a little more staying power, but that's
> > just your over-inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a
> > WINNER, for fuck's sake! It's not going to happen, Paula... just like
> > all the other failures in your pathetic life. The way I see it, you're
> > just a rifle and a bell tower away from making the evening news as it is.
> > Do me a favor though, Paula... when you go completely berserk, assuming
> > the cops don't cap your sorry ass right on the spot, don't put the blame
> > on me, emkay? We're just having a little fun.
>
> Wow, eight words from me, and you spew all the above.
> I'm winning, for fuck's sake!
> Nadegda will post at her usual time, and spank you silly.
> Andrew Wilson just posted last night.
> Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
you kOOks are on the same hook, Paula.
> But do keep reading into things your wishful thinking and desperate
> hopes, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp, as we spank you to blisters.
>
> <snicker>
>
> >>> Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger. I have no plans
> >>> to retire any time soon. I like what I'm doing, and my customers like
> >>> what I'm doing.
> >>
> >> Those making less than minimum wage are seldom able to retire.
> >> <snicker>
> >>
> >> The only customers who like what you're doing are doing you:
> >> k52oab$ecd$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
> >>
> >> <guffaw>
>
> No reply, Chimpy?
Checkmate
Oct 14, 2012, 11:19:26 PM10/14/12
to
think that's what's confusing you. Ask Socky Nadiggah to explain what
"non-blank" lines of text are.
Nadegda
Oct 14, 2012, 11:20:22 PM10/14/12
to
posters that nobody's ever seen before.
Meanwhile, I notice I have you foaming so hard you keep changing the
Subject: to say you hate me or foam in all caps when you reply to me.
Thanks for those little tokens of my pwnership of you, kooky.
> Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you
> claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a ten-
> line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line" follow-
> up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically turned ten
> lines into one, you not only deleted all of the incriminating text in
> your reply, you invented something that you call "non-blank lines".
>
> You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. You
> may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every time just
> how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me, Nadiggah... just what
> are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count to ten?
only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the
first one contained the SPNAK.
Now this post has only eleven lines of original text by me. I expect at
least triple that in foamy response from you by nine-thirty. Get cracking!
<snicker>
Nadegda
Oct 14, 2012, 11:25:05 PM10/14/12
to
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:59:44 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-
FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> "kook
>>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
>>stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
>
> Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot
There were no sock votes on the Official AUK ballot, kook; only on your
FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> "kook
>>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
>>stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
>
> Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot
pale imitation of one.
Message has been deleted
Fred Hall
Oct 14, 2012, 11:42:18 PM10/14/12
to
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:20:22 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had
>only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the
>first one contained the SPNAK.
MID, Paul?
<nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had
>only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the
>first one contained the SPNAK.
>
>Now this post has only eleven lines of original text by me. I expect at
>least triple that in foamy response from you by nine-thirty. Get cracking!
Kensi, as "she's" an ASStrophysicist.
Checkmate
Oct 14, 2012, 11:43:58 PM10/14/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Checkmate!
go away. That isn't going to happen until I'm through with you.
> > Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you
> > claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a ten-
> > line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line" follow-
> > up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically turned ten
> > lines into one, you not only deleted all of the incriminating text in
> > your reply, you invented something that you call "non-blank lines".
> >
> > You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. You
> > may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every time just
> > how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me, Nadiggah... just what
> > are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count to ten?
>
> Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had
> only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the
> first one contained the SPNAK.
math failure to your attention? Is that why you've been evading the
issue as to your math incompetency ever since? Is that why you invented
"non-blank" lines in a pathetic attempt to explain why you posted ten
lines of text and called it one?
Oh, look! Here it is again! Let's count the lines, shall we? Of course
we won't count the mid, but look! Starting with "SPNAK!" and ending with
"<snicker>", how many lines of text do we have? It sure looks like ten
to me. How many do YOU see, kOOky?
>> Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago,
>> kook?
>>
>> <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
>>
[START HERE]
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> I have some advice for you, Donut (so named because you're a big fat
>> zero): Stop lying. You're not good at it. You keep getting caught in
>> your lies and winding up with egg on your face. A smart person would
>> have realized he wasn't cut out for it and would have given up trying
>> to lie convincingly long ago. You, of course, are not a smart person,
>> so I'm having to tell you this instead of you figuring it out on your
>> own.
>>
>> You're welcome, by the way.
>>
>> <snicker>
[END HERE]
Also, would you please point out which are the "non-blank" lines of text
that are somehow different from the one line of text you saw fit to
count? Thanks so much, looking forward to your reply...
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Fred Hall
Oct 14, 2012, 11:57:28 PM10/14/12
to
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:25:05 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
specifically noted on his fake ballot that socks are encouraged to
vote in your fake elections. Do you not read the stupid shit you
TetraTards post?
Oh, and I'd still like an explanation of that "non-blank lines"
concept. But I can understand why you would want to run from that
Checky Spank.
<nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:59:44 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-
>FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> "kook
>>>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
>>>stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
>>
>> Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot
>
>There were no sock votes on the Official AUK ballot, kook; only on your
>pale imitation of one.
You are a liar, Paul. Your goofy [Tard] Okie Greasemonkey
>On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:59:44 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-
>FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> "kook
>>>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
>>>stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
>>
>> Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot
>
>There were no sock votes on the Official AUK ballot, kook; only on your
>pale imitation of one.
specifically noted on his fake ballot that socks are encouraged to
vote in your fake elections. Do you not read the stupid shit you
TetraTards post?
Oh, and I'd still like an explanation of that "non-blank lines"
concept. But I can understand why you would want to run from that
Checky Spank.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Checkmate
Oct 15, 2012, 1:29:58 AM10/15/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what This account has been banned because it violated
Checkmate!
the Google Groups Terms Of Use said:
>
> An tSin Gorm <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <61cmaq....@news.alt.net>,
> > This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of
> > Use <laug...@u.kook> wrote:
> >
> >> An tSin Gorm <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <1kryugf.ngco8jsmov6eN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>,
> >> > sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> An tSin Gorm <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > > > > As I have such difficulty with this technical stuff, perhaps you
> >> >> > > > > could
> >> >> > > > > kindly help me here? Please list the members of the Tetrarchy (I'm
> >> >> > > > > not
> >> >> > > > > quite clear as to who exactly they are) and the Time Zones that
> >> >> > > > > they
> >> >> > > > > post from. I'd hate to embark on fruitless research because I was
> >> >> > > > > chasing a red herring. Thanks!
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > ><http://stuffpoint.com/doctor-who/image/67958-doctor-who-state-of-deca
> >> >> > > >y
> >> >> > > -4-episode-screencap-18x16.jpg>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > But, but, I only see three people in that photo. Is the fourth
> >> >> > > one taking the photo, or maybe it's the Invisible Man?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Geez, this stuff is hard.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It's hard to find a picture of all four. You can sort of see them to the
> >> >> > petite blonde's right:
> >> >> ><http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-90aX03KSnRQ/TfhjbujBFOI/AAAAAAAAAKQ/j94LX2c-
> >> >> r6I/s1600/001aUKON.jpg>
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh my, that guy in the front looks really upset, is he the real one
> >> >> or is that someone else hiding behind him? Anyway, I wouldn't
> >> >> want to meet /him/ down a dark alley, oh dear me no.
> >> >
> >> > He looks upset because he has his master's hand up his puppet, moving his
> >> > head
> >> > and mouth and blinking the eyes.
> >>
> >> Like this sinful fellow.
> >>
> >> http://botisrpg.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/st-4s05.jpg
> >
> > Can you grunt like a pig? Can you? Can you? Let me hear you grunt like a pig.
>
> Well, okay, but you'll have to take me to dinner and a show first.
I thought it was "squeal" like a pig.
Nadegda
Oct 15, 2012, 1:34:11 AM10/15/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks some more before I go to bed.
First, I goaded you into coming back here by insinuating that you'd lost
your net access for cause, and now I've got you screeding not just
textual fanfic but fictional pictures. At this rate, it won't be long
before I get you to slave for hours making another tribute video about
the Tetrarchy.
<snicker>
your net access for cause, and now I've got you screeding not just
textual fanfic but fictional pictures. At this rate, it won't be long
before I get you to slave for hours making another tribute video about
the Tetrarchy.
<snicker>
Nadegda
Oct 15, 2012, 2:08:57 AM10/15/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks some more before I go to bed.
Here, I'll recap things for you, since you're too retarded to figure it
out on your own.
First, Johnny Donut the Big Fat Zero made the following k'lame, in
<XnsA0EAD1C51512...@208.90.168.18>:
|> First, check out what kensi said:
|>
|>> I'm going to be mostly offline from about 10 minutes from now until
|>> Monday afternoon having a much nicer weekend than any k00k can aspire
|>> to. Adios!
|>>
|>> *snicker*
|>
|> Good thing you mentioned that, or I probably wouldn't have noticed.
|> Make sure you come back and entertain us Monday afternoon. Oh... and
|> try to be sober by then, okay?
|
| The Sock is serving weekends in the county jail for writing checks its
| pea-brain can't cash.
This, along with a similar k'lame by Ferd, was disproved later when kensi
posted an article with message-ID <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org> some
time later (but still during the weekend).
When I later had seen both posts, I wrote a reply to Johnny Donut the Big
Fat Zero, <k5aos7$jan$4...@dont-email.me>, with:
| Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago, kook?
|
| <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
the one whose line count is in dispute. But it's not. Read on.
In response to it, you posted <617en3....@news.alt.net>:
| Did... did you just prove that Kensi's still screeding on Usenet
My next post, which is the one you took issue with, has the message-ID
<k5apl7$jan$5...@dont-email.me>:
| BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as "screeding", you
| ridiculous buffoon.
You responded with <617g7s....@news.alt.net>:
|> BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as "screeding", you
|> ridiculous buffoon.
|
| Now I'm confused. Wasn't that supposed to be a quote from her giving
| advice to a donut? I counted ten lines... but then you guys do math a
| little differently.
Here is kensi's post, <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org>, the one whose
line count is at issue -- the entire post body:
| On 12/10/2012 10:36 PM, Fred Hall wrote:
| > Eventually. Kensi did a bad, bad thing.
|
| Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
|
| *snicker*
|
| *gone again now -- adios, kOok*
|
| --
| "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
| the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
Besides the three lines of original text there are four blank lines, an
attribution line, a line of quoted text, a sig separator, and two lines
of sig. That's 12 total lines of body, but 9 of those don't count as
lines of original text, and of the remaining three, only one is of
important material.
It's quite reasonable to say that she wrote a "one-line reply" since the
key thing in the post she fired off is just this:
| Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
If you want to be more pedantic about it, it was technically three lines
that she typed.
However, the original point, that contrary to your k'lame in
<617en3....@news.alt.net> kensi was not screeding, stands, whether
you count kensi's post as one line, or three, or even twelve.
SPNAK!
Your subsequent k'lame that kensi's post had ten lines is shown to be
utterly ridiculous, since the only sensible numbers, depending on what
lines you consider significant, are one, three, and twelve. Not ten.
SPNAK!!
Your citing, just now, of ten lines of one of *my* posts, when the post
whose line count you'd originally been screeding about was kensi's, is
just another colossal blunder by you.
SPNAK!!!
And rather than simply clear up your confusion as soon as you evidenced
it, I let you rant and rave and screed a good dozen more posts in which
you repeated your "ten lines" k'lame, cited incorrect message-IDs, and
otherwise further proved your confusion, and when I gave you all that
rope for the past 24 hours or so, you were a good little kook and hanged
yourself with it.
Now there's a dozen or more embarrassing posts of yours, some ranting
with all-caps subject lines (including the one this is posted as a reply
to), that I've proven wrong, all with just this one post of mine.
SPNAK!!!!
Stop underestimating the Tetrarchy or you'll just end up squirming on the
receiving end of even bigger, even more severely hob-nailed boots in the
future, kook.
<snicker>
P.S. "non-blank lines" are exactly what the name implies. If you take
that post of kensi's and view it with the quoted text and signature
(separator included) folded away, there are four blank lines shown
interspersed with the three lines of original text. Seven (another number
that isn't ten) lines total; three that are not blank. Three non-blank
lines. Understand this basic concept now, retard?
Message has been deleted
Nadegda
Oct 15, 2012, 2:21:52 AM10/15/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks some more before I go to bed.
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:57:28 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-
FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:25:05 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:59:44 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-
>>FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "kook
>>>>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people
>>>>and stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google
>>>>Groups
>>>
>>> Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot
>>
>>There were no sock votes on the Official AUK ballot, kook; only on your
>>pale imitation of one.
>
> You are a liar, Paul. Your goofy [Tard] Okie Greasemonkey specifically
> noted on his fake ballot that socks are encouraged to vote in your fake
> elections. Do you not read the stupid shit you TetraTards post?
Your errors above are numerous. Here is a detailed breakdown of them:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:25:05 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:59:44 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-
>>FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "kook
>>>>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people
>>>>and stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google
>>>>Groups
>>>
>>> Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot
>>
>>There were no sock votes on the Official AUK ballot, kook; only on your
>>pale imitation of one.
>
> You are a liar, Paul. Your goofy [Tard] Okie Greasemonkey specifically
> noted on his fake ballot that socks are encouraged to vote in your fake
> elections. Do you not read the stupid shit you TetraTards post?
1. My name is not Paul.
2. His name is not [Tard] Okie Greasemonkey.
3. His ballot is not the fake one -- yours is.
4. It's awards, not an election, and it's not the fake one -- yours is.
5. We're the Tetrarchy, not the "TetraTards".
6. None of what we write is "stupid shit".
And last, but not least,
7. Noting that socks are encouraged to vote is not the same thing as you
proving that any actual socks did actually vote.
Meanwhile, your continuing failure to address the matter of the obvious
GG socks voting in your fake awards has been noted, kook.
> Oh, and I'd still like an explanation of that "non-blank lines"
> concept.
while before posting it, because Stalemate's behavior meant that the
spnak would be bigger the longer I waited. Now, his goose is cooked. The
explanation you seek is in my epic spank of Stalemate, which is posted
somewhere else in this thread.
Fetch, boy!
<snicker>
> But I can understand why you would want to run from that Checky Spank.
kook, you brainless kook?
Nadegda
Oct 15, 2012, 2:38:10 AM10/15/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks some more before I go to bed.
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:15:00 -0700, An tSin Gorm wrote:
> In article <k5g78j$6a2$1...@dont-email.me>, Nadegda
>
> <snicker>
> <snicker>
Your non sequitur paraphrasing from a Sylvester Stallone movie is noted.
I do suppose I have one thing in common with the original subject of that
line: I'm kicking bad-guy ass and will not be defeated. He, too, was
*winning*, for fuck's sake.
<snicker>
And now, since it's half past eleven, I really must be getting to bed.
You go ahead and foam some more while I catch some z's, so I'll have some
fresh kookposts to rip to shreds tomorrow after work.
Checkmate
Oct 15, 2012, 3:16:11 AM10/15/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Checkmate!
> |> First, check out what kensi said:
> |>
> |>> I'm going to be mostly offline from about 10 minutes from now until
> |>> Monday afternoon having a much nicer weekend than any k00k can aspire
> |>> to. Adios!
> |>>
> |>> *snicker*
> |>
> |> Good thing you mentioned that, or I probably wouldn't have noticed.
> |> Make sure you come back and entertain us Monday afternoon. Oh... and
> |> try to be sober by then, okay?
> |
> | The Sock is serving weekends in the county jail for writing checks its
> | pea-brain can't cash.
>
> This, along with a similar k'lame by Ferd, was disproved later when kensi
> posted an article with message-ID <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org> some
> time later (but still during the weekend).
>
> When I later had seen both posts, I wrote a reply to Johnny Donut the Big
> Fat Zero, <k5aos7$jan$4...@dont-email.me>, with:
> | Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago, kook?
> |
> | <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
>
> That reply of mine is the post that you quoted above and seem to think is
> the one whose line count is in dispute. But it's not. Read on.
>
> In response to it, you posted <617en3....@news.alt.net>:
>
> | Did... did you just prove that Kensi's still screeding on Usenet
>
> My next post, which is the one you took issue with, has the message-ID
> <k5apl7$jan$5...@dont-email.me>:
>
> | BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as "screeding", you
> | ridiculous buffoon.
>
> You responded with <617g7s....@news.alt.net>:
>
> |> BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as "screeding", you
> |> ridiculous buffoon.
> |
> | Now I'm confused. Wasn't that supposed to be a quote from her giving
> | advice to a donut? I counted ten lines... but then you guys do math a
> | little differently.
snipped the whole thing and revised your statement to "Three non-blank
lines of original text," which makes absolutely no sense. How does an
alleged "one-line followup" suddenly turn into "Three non-blank lines of
original text"? If it's original text, it IS the followup.
> Here is kensi's post, <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org>, the one whose
> line count is at issue -- the entire post body:
>
> | On 12/10/2012 10:36 PM, Fred Hall wrote:
> | > Eventually. Kensi did a bad, bad thing.
> |
> | Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
> |
> | *snicker*
> |
> | *gone again now -- adios, kOok*
> |
> | --
> | "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
> | the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
>
> Besides the three lines of original text there are four blank lines, an
> attribution line, a line of quoted text, a sig separator, and two lines
> of sig. That's 12 total lines of body, but 9 of those don't count as
> lines of original text, and of the remaining three, only one is of
> important material.
took you several days to come up with, BTW) you said it was a "one-line"
follow-up, when the expanded mid clearly shows it's a three-line follow-
up. I don't care about blank lines or sig delimiters, there are three
lines of text, not one. Clearly, your "non-blank" lines are a construct
in order for you to still claim you know how to count.
> It's quite reasonable to say that she wrote a "one-line reply" since the
> key thing in the post she fired off is just this:
place now.
> | Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
>
> If you want to be more pedantic about it, it was technically three lines
> that she typed.
1. Your reply and quote were poorly attributed, making your statement
confusing, as I thought the part below the mid was the same as the
contents of the mid, which is the way a normally functioning person would
do it, and I asked you for clarification.
2. You realized that you actually did fuck up when you claimed the post
was one line, because it was actually three.
3. You hoped it would all go away, so you snipped the whole thing out of
your reply.
4. When pressed, you had to admit that it actually was three lines, not
one, and hearing your explanation, I'll go along with that.
5. The fact remains that you were still wrong, you still can't count,
and you thought you could turn your failure into victolly, simply by
making up different kinds of lines. Specifically the line you still
wished to count, and the others you figured you could just designate as
"non-blank" lines.
> However, the original point, that contrary to your k'lame in
> <617en3....@news.alt.net> kensi was not screeding, stands, whether
> you count kensi's post as one line, or three, or even twelve.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> Your subsequent k'lame that kensi's post had ten lines is shown to be
> utterly ridiculous, since the only sensible numbers, depending on what
> lines you consider significant, are one, three, and twelve. Not ten.
drivel, and not Kensi's, since there's no one in this group named Johnny
Donut.
>
> Your citing, just now, of ten lines of one of *my* posts, when the post
> whose line count you'd originally been screeding about was kensi's, is
> just another colossal blunder by you.
notwithstanding the fact that you're all Paul Derbyshit anyway.
> And rather than simply clear up your confusion as soon as you evidenced
> it, I let you rant and rave and screed a good dozen more posts in which
> you repeated your "ten lines" k'lame, cited incorrect message-IDs, and
> otherwise further proved your confusion, and when I gave you all that
> rope for the past 24 hours or so, you were a good little kook and hanged
> yourself with it.
either way, that your claim that it was a one-line post was incorrect.
You even went to the trouble of inventing "non-blank lines" in order to
try and explain that you fucked up regardless.
> Now there's a dozen or more embarrassing posts of yours, some ranting
> with all-caps subject lines (including the one this is posted as a reply
> to), that I've proven wrong, all with just this one post of mine.
>
> SPNAK!!!!
>
> Stop underestimating the Tetrarchy or you'll just end up squirming on the
> receiving end of even bigger, even more severely hob-nailed boots in the
> future, kook.
>
> <snicker>
>
> P.S. "non-blank lines" are exactly what the name implies. If you take
> that post of kensi's and view it with the quoted text and signature
> (separator included) folded away, there are four blank lines shown
> interspersed with the three lines of original text. Seven (another number
> that isn't ten) lines total; three that are not blank. Three non-blank
> lines. Understand this basic concept now, retard?
three lines, not one, but the only way you can backpedal out of that
little quandary, is to invent "non-blank lines" that somehow don't count.
Got it. BTW, they already have a name for "non-blank lines". They're
called lines.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 15, 2012, 9:46:11 AM10/15/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
monkey?! Somebody get the profoundly retarded masturbating monkey!
<snicker>
>> |> First, check out what kensi said:
>> |>
>> |>> I'm going to be mostly offline from about 10 minutes from now until
>> |>> Monday afternoon having a much nicer weekend than any k00k can aspire
>> |>> to. Adios!
>> |>>
>> |>> *snicker*
>> |>
>> |> Good thing you mentioned that, or I probably wouldn't have noticed.
>> |> Make sure you come back and entertain us Monday afternoon. Oh... and
>> |> try to be sober by then, okay?
>> |
>> | The Sock is serving weekends in the county jail for writing checks its
>> | pea-brain can't cash.
>>
>> This, along with a similar k'lame by Ferd, was disproved later when kensi
>> posted an article with message-ID <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org> some
>> time later (but still during the weekend).
>>
>> When I later had seen both posts, I wrote a reply to Johnny Donut the Big
>> Fat Zero, <k5aos7$jan$4...@dont-email.me>, with:
>
> Who's "Johnny Donut," kOOk? There's no one here posting under that name.
courtesy phone.
<snicker>
>> | Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago, kook?
>> |
>> | <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
>>
>> That reply of mine is the post that you quoted above and seem to think is
>> the one whose line count is in dispute. But it's not. Read on.
>>
>> In response to it, you posted <617en3....@news.alt.net>:
>>
>> | Did... did you just prove that Kensi's still screeding on Usenet
>>
>> My next post, which is the one you took issue with, has the message-ID
>> <k5apl7$jan$5...@dont-email.me>:
>>
>> | BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as "screeding", you
>> | ridiculous buffoon.
>>
>> You responded with <617g7s....@news.alt.net>:
>>
>> |> BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as "screeding", you
>> |> ridiculous buffoon.
>> |
>> | Now I'm confused. Wasn't that supposed to be a quote from her giving
>> | advice to a donut? I counted ten lines... but then you guys do math a
>> | little differently.
>
> Here's where I asked you to clarify your goofy reply. Instead, you
> snipped the whole thing and revised your statement to "Three non-blank
> lines of original text," which makes absolutely no sense. How does an
> alleged "one-line followup" suddenly turn into "Three non-blank lines of
> original text"? If it's original text, it IS the followup.
*snicker*
*gone again now -- adios, k0ok*
Sure, I would have counted them if it'd been me, but actions depicted
in text are a grey area in regards to whether they're actually
counted, as .sig lines used to be, but are no longer.
But the original assertion that only one line of actual content that
conveyed any information is still valid.
<snicker>
Wait... are you going to count that?
>> Here is kensi's post, <k5anid$eem$1...@speranza.aioe.org>, the one whose
>> line count is at issue -- the entire post body:
>>
>> | On 12/10/2012 10:36 PM, Fred Hall wrote:
>> | > Eventually. Kensi did a bad, bad thing.
>> |
>> | Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
>> |
>> | *snicker*
>> |
>> | *gone again now -- adios, kOok*
>> |
>> | --
>> | "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
>> | the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
>>
>> Besides the three lines of original text there are four blank lines, an
>> attribution line, a line of quoted text, a sig separator, and two lines
>> of sig. That's 12 total lines of body, but 9 of those don't count as
>> lines of original text, and of the remaining three, only one is of
>> important material.
>
> We still have a problem, Nads. Even allowing you that backpedal (which
> took you several days to come up with, BTW) you said it was a "one-line"
> follow-up, when the expanded mid clearly shows it's a three-line follow-
> up. I don't care about blank lines or sig delimiters, there are three
> lines of text, not one. Clearly, your "non-blank" lines are a construct
> in order for you to still claim you know how to count.
right Chimpy?
How does one 'expand' an MID, Chimpy? When an MID is 'expanded', does
it make a wheezing noise like an accordion? Please to be providing
examples of these 'expanded' MIDs.
Oh, and you'll also have to explain how it is that you were able to
expand a maximum of three lines of text into 10... or admit you can't
count.
Get right on that, bitch.
<snicker>
>> It's quite reasonable to say that she wrote a "one-line reply" since the
>> key thing in the post she fired off is just this:
>
> The "key thing," Nads? You've got those goal posts moving all over the
> place now.
actually contained 10 lines of text... now be getting right on
explaining where those other seven lines of text went, bitch.
<snicker>
>> | Just briefly checking in to say: WRONG!
>>
>> If you want to be more pedantic about it, it was technically three lines
>> that she typed.
>
> Thank you. Here's what we've learned so far:
>
> 1. Your reply and quote were poorly attributed, making your statement
> confusing, as I thought the part below the mid was the same as the
> contents of the mid, which is the way a normally functioning person would
> do it, and I asked you for clarification.
problems, unless it's spelled out in 4" block letters in bright
crayon, it'd be tough to follow.
> 2. You realized that you actually did fuck up when you claimed the post
> was one line, because it was actually three.
of text depicting action are disputable as to whether they should be
counted) than your claiming they were 10 lines of text.
> 3. You hoped it would all go away, so you snipped the whole thing out of
> your reply.
compelling you to foam again and again your kooky screed about that
post containing 10 lines of text.
And you'll be getting right on proving your 10-line contention, bitch.
> 4. When pressed, you had to admit that it actually was three lines, not
> one, and hearing your explanation, I'll go along with that.
you claimed... so you're still claiming it's 10 lines until you make
that admission.
> 5. The fact remains that you were still wrong, you still can't count,
> and you thought you could turn your failure into victolly, simply by
> making up different kinds of lines. Specifically the line you still
> wished to count, and the others you figured you could just designate as
> "non-blank" lines.
getting right on proving these 10 lines of text, bitch.
<snicker>
>> However, the original point, that contrary to your k'lame in
>> <617en3....@news.alt.net> kensi was not screeding, stands, whether
>> you count kensi's post as one line, or three, or even twelve.
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> Your subsequent k'lame that kensi's post had ten lines is shown to be
>> utterly ridiculous, since the only sensible numbers, depending on what
>> lines you consider significant, are one, three, and twelve. Not ten.
>
> Perhaps you should have specified that the drivel below the mid was your
> drivel, and not Kensi's, since there's no one in this group named Johnny
> Donut.
stat.
>> Your citing, just now, of ten lines of one of *my* posts, when the post
>> whose line count you'd originally been screeding about was kensi's, is
>> just another colossal blunder by you.
>
> More like a failure on your part to distinguish one from the other,
> notwithstanding the fact that you're all Paul Derbyshit anyway.
person, don't you think this issue would never have even come up, fat
retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>> And rather than simply clear up your confusion as soon as you evidenced
>> it, I let you rant and rave and screed a good dozen more posts in which
>> you repeated your "ten lines" k'lame, cited incorrect message-IDs, and
>> otherwise further proved your confusion, and when I gave you all that
>> rope for the past 24 hours or so, you were a good little kook and hanged
>> yourself with it.
>
> You didn't respond until I coaxed it out of you, because you realized...
> either way, that your claim that it was a one-line post was incorrect.
> You even went to the trouble of inventing "non-blank lines" in order to
> try and explain that you fucked up regardless.
you, you yanked the rope from her hands, tied a hangman's noose,
slipped it around your neck, and picked out a sturdy tree. Then you
begged to be hanged.
<snicker>
>> Now there's a dozen or more embarrassing posts of yours, some ranting
>> with all-caps subject lines (including the one this is posted as a reply
>> to), that I've proven wrong, all with just this one post of mine.
>>
>> SPNAK!!!!
>>
>> Stop underestimating the Tetrarchy or you'll just end up squirming on the
>> receiving end of even bigger, even more severely hob-nailed boots in the
>> future, kook.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> P.S. "non-blank lines" are exactly what the name implies. If you take
>> that post of kensi's and view it with the quoted text and signature
>> (separator included) folded away, there are four blank lines shown
>> interspersed with the three lines of original text. Seven (another number
>> that isn't ten) lines total; three that are not blank. Three non-blank
>> lines. Understand this basic concept now, retard?
>
> So what you're really saying, is you were still wrong. The post had
> three lines, not one, but the only way you can backpedal out of that
> little quandary, is to invent "non-blank lines" that somehow don't count.
> Got it. BTW, they already have a name for "non-blank lines". They're
> called lines.
lines of text in kensi's post... so please to be getting right on
proving in a mathematical fashion just how you've "expanded the MID"
from three lines to 10.
<cues song from Mission Impossible>
<snicker>
Count those two lines above, bitch.
--
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Kook Awards Official Voting Ballot:
Message-ID: <k4b1ce$j4k$2...@news.mixmin.net>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134906097300
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/dd05de54d25966a4
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 15, 2012, 9:46:13 AM10/15/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
silly? And this is further proof that you can't even properly count
lines of text, Chimpy.
Now, your task is to explain in minute detail where you got 10 lines
of text. Be getting right on that, bitch.
<snicker>
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 15, 2012, 9:46:15 AM10/15/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
drug-addicted chimp. Do you get paid extra if your squealing is
realistic enough? Can chimps squeal like pigs?
Let's bring in an expert on this... Alex "World's Ugliest Lawn Gnome"
Cain, if Chimpy were to squeal convincingly enough for you, would you
pay him extra from the weekly allowance that Mommy gives you?
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 15, 2012, 9:46:20 AM10/15/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Checkmate, in <news:61cksn....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>>
> said:
>
>>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:61bacl....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!
>>>
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!
>>>
>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>> said:
>>>
>>>>
>>> said:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Checkmate, in <news:61a9at....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>>>
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>> Checkmate!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Checkmate, in <news:61a9at....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>>>
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>> Checkmate!
>>>>>
>>>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>>>> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Checkmate, in <news:617n6u....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>>>> Checkmate!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Checkmate, in <news:617n6u....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>>>> Checkmate!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>>>>>> said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Checkmate, in <news:6172pf....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that
>>>>>>>>> out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on
>>>>>>>>> Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy
>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
>>>>>>>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i....@news.alt.net). Andrew
>>>>>>>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've made 137 posts for October to date, excluding tonight's posts
>>>>>>>> (which you've not had a chance to reply to yet, as they've just been
>>>>>>>> sent). The MIDs of my posts in which you'd replied to me:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> k4dq13$hvk$2...@news.mixmin.net k4dq1b$hvv$2...@news.mixmin.net
>>>>>>>> k4dr4o$jeg$1...@news.mixmin.net k4drpm$k63$1...@news.mixmin.net
>>>>>>>> k4dsc7$l32$1...@news.mixmin.net k4eo3k$sos$2...@news.mixmin.net
>>>>>>>> k4gfk0$ea6$2...@news.mixmin.net k4isd9$rv2$1...@news.mixmin.net
>>>>>>>> k4isdl$rv2$2...@news.mixmin.net k4itar$suk$1...@news.mixmin.net
>>>>>>>> k4itj5$t5h$1...@news.mixmin.net k4k060$ae4$3...@news.mixmin.net
>>>>>>>> k4k060$ae5$3...@news.mixmin.net k4lh68$p93$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k4llgl$qe7$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4o74r$1qu$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k4o76b$1qu$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4o77q$1qu$5...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k4pfl4$ot9$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4pfl9$ot4$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k4qsvl$o9n$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4qsvs$o9n$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k4tfno$en$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k4ur0s$k4t$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k4ur0r$k4u$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k508l2$7db$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k508l5$7da$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k514ic$m1r$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k51r6c$2pn$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k51r6c$2po$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k51r6f$2pn$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k52oal$ece$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k52oaq$ecd$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k52ob0$ece$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k53puk$u8e$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k53pum$u8f$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k53pun$u8e$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k55854$r54$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k55857$r54$5...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k56c83$9b1$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k57sm7$1kr$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k59333$kkc$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k59336$kkd$2...@newsfeed.x-privat.org k59336$kkc$3...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>> k59338$kkc$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (45 / 137) * 100 = 32.85% actual response rate vs. your claimed 10%.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I used my posts, so it was clear you were responding to me *and*
>>>>>>>> reading what I wrote, contrary to your k'lame. You're replying to
>>>>>>>> nearly every post I make that's directed at you. In short, I pwn you.
>>>>>>>> And I've now proven you can't calculate percentages.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just so you know... you're at 935 posts for October to date (an
>>>>>>>> average of 77.92 posts per day (163 yesterday, 107 today... so you're
>>>>>>>> screeding far above even your higher than normal one-month rate, which
>>>>>>>> is 2.614 times your historical rate), putting you on track to have
>>>>>>>> your third screediest month ever), and you've now broken the 14
>>>>>>>> minutes between posts barrier. Autofroth much, kook?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How's that crappy less-than-minimum-wage job with no benefits going,
>>>>>>>> fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Getting a lot of work done? No?
>>>>>>>> That's alright... you're sucking hard at the welfare teat, eh? No need
>>>>>>>> to work when you're a fat lazy dole bludging layabout like you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SPNAK!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, yeah, yeah... text-wall. Spanking you sometimes requires
>>>>>>>> actually typing something other than the truthy phrase "fat retarded
>>>>>>>> drug-addicted chimp".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, I click on most of them and answer quite a few. I just don't bother
>>>>>>> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is why in the posts outlined above, you've replied point by
>>>>>> point,
>>>>>
>>>>> Your homework assignment tonight, is to go through every one of those
>>>>> posts and support your claim that I've replied point by point in every
>>>>> one of them. Post your proof here, bitch, and be quick about it.
>>>>
>>>> You made the k'lame that you "don't bother to wade through 90% of the
>>>> screed swamp that's in them",
>>>
>>> Yes, I did.
>>
>> Again with the point by point reply... which doesn't exactly bolster
>> your k'lame that you're not replying point by point, doesn't it.
>>
>> <snicker>
No reply, Chimpy? What a coward. <guffaw>
>>>> so the impetus is upon you to prove
>>>
>>> No, it's not.
>>
>> Yes, it is. As you've made a claim that is in direct opposition to
>> reality, you'll have to back up that claim.
>
> Paul, you're obviously trying to count the "non-blank" lines as text. I
> think that's what's confusing you. Ask Socky Nadiggah to explain what
> "non-blank" lines of text are.
Your continuing cowardice in not providing any evidence to back up
your retarded k'lame is noted, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp.
<snicker>
>>>> your
>>>> k'lame, kook. I've already disproven your k'lame of ignoring 90% of my
>>>
>>> No, you haven't.
>>
>> Oh, that's right, you get confused by simple math.
>>
>> <snicker>
No reply, Chimpy? Keep running from your spanks, and you'll earn
yourself some cowardice-oriented kook awards. <chortle>
>>>> posts, the evidence is directly above.
>>>
>>> No, it isn't.
>>
>> Yes, it is, you're just too stupid to understand it.
Your tacit admission to being too stupid to understand the evidence
presented directly above is noted, Chimpy. <chuckle>
>>>> But I see you're replying point by point in your reply now... kind of
>>>> makes your kooky k'lames seem... kooky, eh?
>>>
>>> No, it doesn't. This is one post out of many.
>>
>> One post out of many in which you've replied point by point.
>>
>> <snicker>
Your tacit admission to replying point by point in many posts is
noted, Chimpy. <sniggle>
>>>> Post your proof that you haven't been replying point by point here,
>>>> bitch, and be quick about it.
>>>
>>> Get stuffed, Paul... and be quick about it.
>>
>> Your running from providing proof for your k'lame is noted, fat
>> retarded drug-addicted chimp.
Your continued running from providing proof for your k'lame that you
haven't been replying point by point is noted, fat retarded
drug-addicted chimp.
>>>> <snicker>
<snicker>
>>>>>> right? You lying piece of shit who's now backpedaling furiously
>>>>>> in trying to escape yet another bootfuck.
>>>>>
>>>>> You wanna see a good backpedal? Let's see how Nadiggah gets out of the
>>>>> corner I helped her paint herself into.
>>>>
>>>> You've been reduced to grammar lames. You're so ineffectual,
>>>> effeminate and weak it'd be laughable if you weren't so pathetic.
>>>
>>> Kindly point out the alleged grammar lame in this post, Paul. Do it now.
>>> Oh, and tell that sock-bitch of yours to quit running from S/H/IT's
>>> spank...
>>
>> The grammar lame is in the thread you're referencing, which you just
>> referenced again. Of course, your poor reading comprehension skills
>> mean that you can't even understand what you wrote, so we're not
>> surprised that you're arguing against yourself. Again.
Your tacit admission to arguing against yourself, and your cowardice
in not refuting the above point is noted, Chimpy. <LOL>
>>> it's not going to go away any time soon. I want to see many
>>> "non-blank" lines explaining how a ten-line post is really a one-line
>>> post. It seems that none of your socks can count or do simple math any
>>> better than you do.
>>
>> And again.
And again.
>> <snicker>
<snicker>
>>>>>>> See, this is like golf.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is nothing like golf.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did... did you just try to argue with me, kOOk? I'm winning, for fuck's
>>>>> sake.
>>>>
>>>> No, you're not. Not in real life, not on usenet. You're a loser all
>>>> around.
>>>
>>> I know it would comfort you to think that. After all, you've been told
>>> you were a loser all your life. That's why you attempt to find solace in
>>> your imaginary perfect world. It's also why you're such a bitter,
>>> humorless, maladjusted, slimy little shit stain. Have a nice day...
>>
>> Nice fanfic, loser. Now get to screeding... be sure to do so all day
>> and night, you've got a screeding record to break.
Your tacit admission that you're screeding fanfic, that you're a
loser, and that you're going to break your old screeding record is
noted, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp.
Why are you such a coward that you've run from refuting all these
points, Chimpy?
>> <guffaw>
<guffaw>
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Oct 15, 2012, 9:46:20 AM10/15/12
to
Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Checkmate, in <news:61ck48....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>>
>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Checkmate, in <news:61bbee....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!
>>>
>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>> said:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Checkmate, in <news:61a92e....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>>>
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>> Checkmate!
>>>>>
>>>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>>>> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>>
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!
>>>
>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>> said:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Checkmate, in <news:61a92e....@news.alt.net> did thusly write:
>>>>
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>> Checkmate!
>>>>>
>>>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>>>> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Checkmate, in <news:617t58.a...@news.alt.net> did thusly write at
>>>>>> 1:09:50 AM PST:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same
>>>>>>> stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright
>>>>>>> uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves
>>>>>> enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you
>>>>>> can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over
>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
>>>>>> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
>>>>>> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement
>>>>>> plan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Above is where I touched a nerve.
>>>
>>> I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
>>
>> Fag.
>>>>>> 1:09:50 AM PST:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same
>>>>>>> stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright
>>>>>>> uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves
>>>>>> enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you
>>>>>> can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over
>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
>>>>>> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
>>>>>> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement
>>>>>> plan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Above is where I touched a nerve.
>>>
>>> I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
>>
>
> I have no doubts that you are, Paula.
He sez hopefully, dreaming of walking down the aisle with his dream
man... but knowing that it's just that, an impossible dream. Chimps
and humans aren't allowed to marry, much to Chimpy's chagrin.
<snicker>
> <Did you like that PEE-WEE. Paula?>
That was no PeeWee, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp. It was an
IKYABWAI. Do try to keep up.
<snicker>
>>>> Below is where you cry out in pain.
>>>
>>> Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary
>>> perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me now.
>>> She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she can't own
>>> up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky Andrew
>>> around lately either, and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to
>>> up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky Andrew
>>> be in this anymore. You've got a little more staying power, but that's
>>> just your over-inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a
>>> WINNER, for fuck's sake! It's not going to happen, Paula... just like
>>> all the other failures in your pathetic life. The way I see it, you're
>>> just a rifle and a bell tower away from making the evening news as it is.
>>> Do me a favor though, Paula... when you go completely berserk, assuming
>>> the cops don't cap your sorry ass right on the spot, don't put the blame
>>> on me, emkay? We're just having a little fun.
>>
>> Wow, eight words from me, and you spew all the above.
>> I'm winning, for fuck's sake!
>
> So NOW it's like golf, Paula?
No, it's still like football, but you're running the wrong way on the
field and scoring our touchdowns for us, fat retarded drug-addicted
chimp.
<snicker>
>> Nadegda will post at her usual time, and spank you silly.
>> Andrew Wilson just posted last night.
>> Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
>
> Yes, and ten minutes into it, "she" was back posting more drivel. All
> you kOOks are on the same hook, Paula.
Sez the kook flopping on the hook, angry that just as he can't get off
the Xanax, he can't get off the New Cabal hook, either.
<snicker>
>> But do keep reading into things your wishful thinking and desperate
>> hopes, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp, as we spank you to blisters.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>>>>> Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger. I have no plans
>>>>> to retire any time soon. I like what I'm doing, and my customers like
>>>>> what I'm doing.
>>>>
>>>> Those making less than minimum wage are seldom able to retire.
>>>> <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> The only customers who like what you're doing are doing you:
>>>> k52oab$ecd$1...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>>
>>>> <guffaw>
>>
>> No reply, Chimpy?
>
> Whenever I don't reply... you can assume I don't really give a shit.
No, I'm assuming that you're running scared because you're a coward.
Prove me wrong, coward. In a point by point manner.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Checkmate
Oct 15, 2012, 12:09:11 PM10/15/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Sn!pe said:
Checkmate!
>
> Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Time to spin up the kooks some more before I go to bed.
>
> I thought that was FNVW 1/4's line.
>
> Hi-Yo, Gonads! Away!
It ain't easy running that many socks and keeping everything sorted out.
That's why Paul's socks all use the same expressions and "styles"... if
you even can call a bunch of rambling, often incoherent vitriol "style".
Checkmate
Oct 15, 2012, 12:10:11 PM10/15/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Sn!pe said:
>
Checkmate!
First, check out what Sn!pe said:
>
> > <snicker>
> > Nads doesn't know about the three shells.
> >
> > <snicker>
> > <snicker>
>
> Is that the game with a pea under one of the shells and
> > Nads doesn't know about the three shells.
> >
> > <snicker>
> > <snicker>
>
> you have to find it? We have a similar game played with
> three cards, it's called "Find The Lady".
>
> Nobody ever can find the Lady, I don't think she really exists.
Oh, you mean Three-Card Monty. The shill always finds the card, but no
one else ever does.
Checkmate
Oct 15, 2012, 12:11:11 PM10/15/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Sn!pe said:
>
Checkmate!
First, check out what Sn!pe said:
>
> An tSin Gorm <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Your non sequitur paraphrasing from a Sylvester Stallone movie is noted.
> > > I do suppose I have one thing in common with the original subject of that
> > > line: I'm kicking bad-guy ass and will not be defeated. He, too, was
> > > *winning*, for fuck's sake.
> >
> > I thought you were a female.
>
> > > Your non sequitur paraphrasing from a Sylvester Stallone movie is noted.
> > > I do suppose I have one thing in common with the original subject of that
> > > line: I'm kicking bad-guy ass and will not be defeated. He, too, was
> > > *winning*, for fuck's sake.
> >
>
> I reckon Nads's nads are detachable, he keeps them
> in his purse when they're not required.
There must be a million uses for Velcro.
Checkmate
Oct 15, 2012, 12:12:12 PM10/15/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Checkmate!
First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
said:
>
said:
>
Checkmate
Oct 15, 2012, 12:52:05 PM10/15/12
to
how the Nads sock got one line when there were three in the part she was
actually referring to. As for her claim that "I meant to do that, it was
all part of my diabolical plan, muhahahahaha!", the only reason it took
her days to properly address the issue, was she knew that either way she
had fucked up the line count. It was only when "she" (you) finally
invented the "non-blank line" concept, that she attempted to turn her
fuckup into a "victolly". Either way, "she" (you) can't count, but we
already knew that.
Checkmate
Oct 15, 2012, 1:01:56 PM10/15/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
said:
Checkmate!
First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
said:
> >>>> Above is where I touched a nerve.
> >>>
> >>> I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
> >>
> >> Fag.
> >
> > I have no doubts that you are, Paula.
>
> He sez hopefully, dreaming of walking down the aisle with his dream
> man...
I'll bet you were thinking about Antonio Banderas when you wrote that.
> >>>
> >>> I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
> >>
> >> Fag.
> >
> > I have no doubts that you are, Paula.
>
> He sez hopefully, dreaming of walking down the aisle with his dream
> man...
> <snicker>
>
> > <Did you like that PEE-WEE. Paula?>
>
> That was no PeeWee, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp. It was an
> IKYABWAI. Do try to keep up.
Checkmate
Oct 15, 2012, 1:08:37 PM10/15/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
said:
[Paul's rambling "point by point" screed snipped]
Checkmate!
First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
said:
> Why are you such a coward that you've run from refuting all these
> points, Chimpy?
>
> >> <guffaw>
>
> <guffaw>
style, Paul. I hope that didn't take up too much of your precious time,
but I'm glad that replying to me is more important in your life than your
rilly hawt tramp-stamped stripper wife, your six little brats, and your
Monopoly real estate empire. Where DO you find the time?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
kensi
Oct 15, 2012, 2:23:54 PM10/15/12
to
On 14/10/2012 11:06 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
> said:
>
>> Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
>
> Yes, and ten minutes into it, "she" was back posting more drivel.
I made one brief post via my tablet while waiting for an elevator. And
>
> Yes, and ten minutes into it, "she" was back posting more drivel.
it was not drivel.
Message has been deleted
kensi
Oct 15, 2012, 2:29:22 PM10/15/12
to
On 13/10/2012 8:50 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> (I don't know what exactly being an astrophysicist entails, but I guess
> it's not strictly nine-to-five.)
It varies an awful lot. Sometimes I have classes to prof or papers to
grade. I have office hours from 2 to 4 most afternoons. At night I
usually sleep, but may be up making observations -- on the other hand if
I'm controlling a telescope in the Eastern Hemisphere or at Hawaii
remotely it can be the daytime here. Or I might be looking at data
gotten earlier. Or peer reviewing others' papers. Writing up grant
proposals. Writing up papers. Once in a while I even take out my own
little reflector and stargaze.
My office hours are mostly quiet and so that's when I usually do my
first catchup of the day. After dinner I may do another, and if I'm up
late working online with a remote observatory or with data, I may even
wind up posting after midnight during breaks or when I'd have to wait
for something anyway. (Working with gigapixel images like sky maps can
make photoshop really, really slow even on an 8GB 3GHz 4-core machine.
Of course, it slows everything *else* down as well, so much so I've
gotten in the habit of using the phone or tablet for any side tasks
they're suited for.)
> (I don't know what exactly being an astrophysicist entails, but I guess
> it's not strictly nine-to-five.)
It varies an awful lot. Sometimes I have classes to prof or papers to
grade. I have office hours from 2 to 4 most afternoons. At night I
usually sleep, but may be up making observations -- on the other hand if
I'm controlling a telescope in the Eastern Hemisphere or at Hawaii
remotely it can be the daytime here. Or I might be looking at data
gotten earlier. Or peer reviewing others' papers. Writing up grant
proposals. Writing up papers. Once in a while I even take out my own
little reflector and stargaze.
My office hours are mostly quiet and so that's when I usually do my
first catchup of the day. After dinner I may do another, and if I'm up
late working online with a remote observatory or with data, I may even
wind up posting after midnight during breaks or when I'd have to wait
for something anyway. (Working with gigapixel images like sky maps can
make photoshop really, really slow even on an 8GB 3GHz 4-core machine.
Of course, it slows everything *else* down as well, so much so I've
gotten in the habit of using the phone or tablet for any side tasks
they're suited for.)
Message has been deleted
kensi
Oct 15, 2012, 2:31:50 PM10/15/12
to
On 15/10/2012 12:09 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> First, check out what Sn!pe said:
>
>> Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to spin up the kooks some more before I go to bed.
>>
>> Do I detect the least little bit of sock-confusion here?
>> I thought that was FNVW 1/4's line.
>>
>> Hi-Yo, Gonads! Away!
>
> It ain't easy running that many socks and keeping everything sorted out.
FNVW 1/4's line is "Time to spin up the kooks again. Melt, kooks, melt!"
> First, check out what Sn!pe said:
>
>> Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to spin up the kooks some more before I go to bed.
>>
>> Do I detect the least little bit of sock-confusion here?
>> I thought that was FNVW 1/4's line.
>>
>> Hi-Yo, Gonads! Away!
>
> It ain't easy running that many socks and keeping everything sorted out.
Your lack of literacy has been noted, BTW. I suppose it's not
surprising, given your already-proven issues with arithmetic, that you
might have problems with the other two of the "three R's" as well.
> That's why Paul's socks all use the same expressions and "styles"...
deliberate trolling of you paranoid ko0ks. And the trolling is clearly
working, given how much you keep spewing about it. *snicker*
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
kensi
Oct 15, 2012, 3:05:09 PM10/15/12
to
On 13/10/2012 9:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> <HoT, bay-beeeeeee!>
Nadegda earned her HoT, and proved it again by brilliantly trolling you
into making those ridiculous "ten lines" k'lames about my three-line
post while waiting for an elevator. I don't know which is more
remarkable -- how badly you got pwned or that you still think you're
> <HoT, bay-beeeeeee!>
Nadegda earned her HoT, and proved it again by brilliantly trolling you
into making those ridiculous "ten lines" k'lames about my three-line
post while waiting for an elevator. I don't know which is more
remarkable -- how badly you got pwned or that you still think you're
*winning*, for fuck's sake.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
kensi
Oct 15, 2012, 4:15:04 PM10/15/12
to
On 15/10/2012 4:05 PM, An tSin Gorm wrote:
> In article <k5hkbp$621$4...@speranza.aioe.org>,
Suffering from reading comprehension problems, ko0ky? I clearly said
"tablet" and the post in question has User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPad)
in its headers. (So should this one.)
> In article <k5hkbp$621$4...@speranza.aioe.org>,
> kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 14/10/2012 11:06 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!
>>>
>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>> said:
>>>
>>>> Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
>>>
>>> Yes, and ten minutes into it, "she" was back posting more drivel.
>>
>> I made one brief post via my tablet while waiting for an elevator. And
>> it was not drivel.
>
> Tablet or phone?
>
>> On 14/10/2012 11:06 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!
>>>
>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>> said:
>>>
>>>> Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
>>>
>>> Yes, and ten minutes into it, "she" was back posting more drivel.
>>
>> I made one brief post via my tablet while waiting for an elevator. And
>> it was not drivel.
>
Suffering from reading comprehension problems, ko0ky? I clearly said
"tablet" and the post in question has User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPad)
in its headers. (So should this one.)
Alfred Taylor
Oct 15, 2012, 4:22:46 PM10/15/12
to
kensi wrote:
> On 13/10/2012 9:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> > <HoT, bay-beeeeeee!>
>
> Nadegda earned her HoT, and proved it again by brilliantly trolling
> you into making those ridiculous "ten lines" k'lames about my
> three-line post while waiting for an elevator. I don't know which is
> more remarkable -- how badly you got pwned or that you still think
> you're winning, for fuck's sake.
> On 13/10/2012 9:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> > <HoT, bay-beeeeeee!>
>
> Nadegda earned her HoT, and proved it again by brilliantly trolling
> you into making those ridiculous "ten lines" k'lames about my
> three-line post while waiting for an elevator. I don't know which is
> more remarkable -- how badly you got pwned or that you still think
Preposterous. Clearly, Checkmate made a complete fool of Nadegda.
Non-blank lines indeed.
--
Message has been deleted
Alfred Taylor
Oct 15, 2012, 4:28:38 PM10/15/12
to
An tSin Gorm wrote:
> In article <507c7096$0$4851$8f2e...@news.shared-secrets.com>,
> Are you related to Alfred Lord Taylor, author of The Charge of the
> Blank Counting Brigade?
Yes.
--
> In article <507c7096$0$4851$8f2e...@news.shared-secrets.com>,
> Blank Counting Brigade?
Yes.
--
Message has been deleted
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Oct 15, 2012, 5:14:00 PM10/15/12
to
"kensi" <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> wrote in message
news:k5hqs7$o67$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
yourself.
--
Sir Gregory
news:k5hqs7$o67$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> On 15/10/2012 4:05 PM, An tSin Gorm wrote:
>> In article <k5hkbp$621$4...@speranza.aioe.org>,
>> kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 14/10/2012 11:06 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>>> said:
>>>>
>>>>> Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, and ten minutes into it, "she" was back posting more drivel.
>>>
>>> I made one brief post via my tablet while waiting for an elevator. And
>>> it was not drivel.
>>
>> Tablet or phone?
>
> Suffering from reading comprehension problems, ko0ky? I clearly said
> "tablet" and the post in question has User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPad) in
> its headers. (So should this one.)
Big deal. Anybody can forge a User-Agent. Check my headers and see for
>> In article <k5hkbp$621$4...@speranza.aioe.org>,
>> kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 14/10/2012 11:06 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
>>>> said:
>>>>
>>>>> Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, and ten minutes into it, "she" was back posting more drivel.
>>>
>>> I made one brief post via my tablet while waiting for an elevator. And
>>> it was not drivel.
>>
>> Tablet or phone?
>
> Suffering from reading comprehension problems, ko0ky? I clearly said
> "tablet" and the post in question has User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPad) in
> its headers. (So should this one.)
yourself.
--
Sir Gregory
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages