> >> >>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same
> >> >>> stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright
> >> >>> uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
> >> >> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
> >> >> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
> >> >> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your
> >> >> nerves enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next
> >> >> day, you can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business'
> >> >> all over again.
> >> >> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's
> >> >> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to
> >> >> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a
> >> >> retirement plan.
> >> >> <snicker>
> >> Above is where I touched a nerve.
> > I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
> Talking to your imaginary girlfriend again, kook? You really shouldn't do > that in public -- only in your bedroom with the curtains drawn and your > washcloth'o'shame at the ready. Don't forget to give "Paula" some TLC > with your bicycle pump first.
> >> Below is where you cry out in pain.
> > Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary
> > perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me
> > now.
> Apparently, replying occasionally to your kooky posts to poke you into > spinning some more constitutes "hiding" now. Interesting. Have you > redefined any *other* words of the English language? You've got a ways to > go at that before you can catch up to Murphy and win a Goofy Azzed Baboon > Award, given his giant head start.
> > She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she
> > can't own up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen
> > socky Andrew around lately either
> I don't know any "socky Andrew", but Andrew Wilson made a handful of > posts several hours before you wrote the above, so I'll take it as your > tacit admission that Andrew Wilson is not a sock.
> > and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to be in this anymore.
> I think she's got someone new in her life, hence her near-absence the > last several weekends. But she's still quite active during the week. > Aren't you paying attention to what goes on around here, kook?
> > You've got a little more staying power, but that's just your over-
> > inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a WINNER, for fuck's
> > sake!
> He's already WON, for fuck's sake! Ferd's on the run and his lame "kook > awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and > stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes
The people who vote in the REAL elections do so under the same nyms.
Every time you see a post from me that says "Hi. Come here often?", it's in response to one of the many mystery socks that show up just in time to vote in your rigged phony elections.
Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a ten-
line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line" follow-
up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically turned ten lines into one, you not only deleted all of the incriminating text in your reply, you invented something that you call "non-blank lines".
You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. You may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every time just how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me, Nadiggah... just what are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count to ten?
>>>>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same >>>>> stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright >>>>> uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
>>>> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>>>> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
>>>> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves >>>> enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you >>>> can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over >>>> again.
>>>> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's >>>> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to >>>> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement >>>> plan.
>>>> <snicker>
>> Above is where I touched a nerve.
> I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
Fag.
>> Below is where you cry out in pain.
> Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary > perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me now.
> She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she can't own > up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky Andrew > around lately either, and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to > be in this anymore. You've got a little more staying power, but that's > just your over-inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a > WINNER, for fuck's sake! It's not going to happen, Paula... just like > all the other failures in your pathetic life. The way I see it, you're > just a rifle and a bell tower away from making the evening news as it is.
> Do me a favor though, Paula... when you go completely berserk, assuming > the cops don't cap your sorry ass right on the spot, don't put the blame > on me, emkay? We're just having a little fun.
Wow, eight words from me, and you spew all the above.
I'm winning, for fuck's sake!
Nadegda will post at her usual time, and spank you silly.
Andrew Wilson just posted last night.
Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
But do keep reading into things your wishful thinking and desperate
hopes, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp, as we spank you to blisters.
<snicker>
>>> Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger. I have no plans >>> to retire any time soon. I like what I'm doing, and my customers like >>> what I'm doing.
>> Those making less than minimum wage are seldom able to retire.
>> <snicker>
>> The only customers who like what you're doing are doing you:
>> k52oab$ec...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>> <guffaw>
No reply, Chimpy?
<guffaw>
--
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
>>>>>>> I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that >>>>>>> out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on >>>>>>> Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy >>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
>>>>>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i.95h.1...@news.alt.net). Andrew
>>>>>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
>>>>>> I've made 137 posts for October to date, excluding tonight's posts
>>>>>> (which you've not had a chance to reply to yet, as they've just been
>>>>>> sent). The MIDs of my posts in which you'd replied to me:
>>>>>> (45 / 137) * 100 = 32.85% actual response rate vs. your claimed 10%.
>>>>>> I used my posts, so it was clear you were responding to me *and*
>>>>>> reading what I wrote, contrary to your k'lame. You're replying to
>>>>>> nearly every post I make that's directed at you. In short, I pwn you.
>>>>>> And I've now proven you can't calculate percentages.
>>>>>> Just so you know... you're at 935 posts for October to date (an
>>>>>> average of 77.92 posts per day (163 yesterday, 107 today... so you're
>>>>>> screeding far above even your higher than normal one-month rate, which
>>>>>> is 2.614 times your historical rate), putting you on track to have
>>>>>> your third screediest month ever), and you've now broken the 14
>>>>>> minutes between posts barrier. Autofroth much, kook?
>>>>>> How's that crappy less-than-minimum-wage job with no benefits going,
>>>>>> fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Getting a lot of work done? No?
>>>>>> That's alright... you're sucking hard at the welfare teat, eh? No need
>>>>>> to work when you're a fat lazy dole bludging layabout like you.
>>>>>> SPNAK!
>>>>>> Yeah, yeah, yeah... text-wall. Spanking you sometimes requires
>>>>>> actually typing something other than the truthy phrase "fat retarded
>>>>>> drug-addicted chimp".
>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>> Oh, I click on most of them and answer quite a few. I just don't bother >>>>> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them.
>>>> Which is why in the posts outlined above, you've replied point by >>>> point,
>>> Your homework assignment tonight, is to go through every one of those >>> posts and support your claim that I've replied point by point in every >>> one of them. Post your proof here, bitch, and be quick about it.
>> You made the k'lame that you "don't bother to wade through 90% of the
>> screed swamp that's in them",
> Yes, I did.
Again with the point by point reply... which doesn't exactly bolster
your k'lame that you're not replying point by point, doesn't it.
<snicker>
>> so the impetus is upon you to prove
> No, it's not.
Yes, it is. As you've made a claim that is in direct opposition to
reality, you'll have to back up that claim.
>> your
>> k'lame, kook. I've already disproven your k'lame of ignoring 90% of my
> No, you haven't.
Oh, that's right, you get confused by simple math.
<snicker>
>> posts, the evidence is directly above.
> No, it isn't.
Yes, it is, you're just too stupid to understand it.
>> But I see you're replying point by point in your reply now... kind of
>> makes your kooky k'lames seem... kooky, eh?
> No, it doesn't. This is one post out of many.
One post out of many in which you've replied point by point.
<snicker>
>> Post your proof that you haven't been replying point by point here,
>> bitch, and be quick about it.
> Get stuffed, Paul... and be quick about it.
Your running from providing proof for your k'lame is noted, fat
retarded drug-addicted chimp.
>> <snicker>
>>>> right? You lying piece of shit who's now backpedaling furiously >>>> in trying to escape yet another bootfuck.
>>> You wanna see a good backpedal? Let's see how Nadiggah gets out of the >>> corner I helped her paint herself into.
>> You've been reduced to grammar lames. You're so ineffectual,
>> effeminate and weak it'd be laughable if you weren't so pathetic.
> Kindly point out the alleged grammar lame in this post, Paul. Do it now.
> Oh, and tell that sock-bitch of yours to quit running from S/H/IT's > spank...
The grammar lame is in the thread you're referencing, which you just
referenced again. Of course, your poor reading comprehension skills
mean that you can't even understand what you wrote, so we're not
surprised that you're arguing against yourself. Again.
> it's not going to go away any time soon. I want to see many > "non-blank" lines explaining how a ten-line post is really a one-line > post. It seems that none of your socks can count or do simple math any > better than you do.
And again.
<snicker>
>>>>> See, this is like golf.
>>>> This is nothing like golf.
>>> Did... did you just try to argue with me, kOOk? I'm winning, for fuck's >>> sake.
>> No, you're not. Not in real life, not on usenet. You're a loser all
>> around.
> I know it would comfort you to think that. After all, you've been told > you were a loser all your life. That's why you attempt to find solace in > your imaginary perfect world. It's also why you're such a bitter, > humorless, maladjusted, slimy little shit stain. Have a nice day...
Nice fanfic, loser. Now get to screeding... be sure to do so all day
and night, you've got a screeding record to break.
<guffaw>
--
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
<nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> "kook >awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and >stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot,
Paul?
Apparently you were confused when you posted the above.
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." -
Nellie Hall
KotAGoR XXXXI COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1 Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1 Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10 @'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1 eMutT lits o' hate #4 Lits Slut#10 Usenet Ruiner #3 Top Asshole On The Net #2 Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2. Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2 Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer of Rasta Khan, March 2006 Pierre Salinger HL&S January & February 2012
> >>>>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same > >>>>> stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright > >>>>> uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
> >>>> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
> >>>> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
> >>>> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves > >>>> enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you > >>>> can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over > >>>> again.
> >>>> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's > >>>> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to > >>>> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement > >>>> plan.
> > Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary > > perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me now.
> > She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she can't own > > up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky Andrew > > around lately either, and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to > > be in this anymore. You've got a little more staying power, but that's > > just your over-inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a > > WINNER, for fuck's sake! It's not going to happen, Paula... just like > > all the other failures in your pathetic life. The way I see it, you're > > just a rifle and a bell tower away from making the evening news as it is.
> > Do me a favor though, Paula... when you go completely berserk, assuming > > the cops don't cap your sorry ass right on the spot, don't put the blame > > on me, emkay? We're just having a little fun.
> Wow, eight words from me, and you spew all the above.
> I'm winning, for fuck's sake!
So NOW it's like golf, Paula?
> Nadegda will post at her usual time, and spank you silly.
> Andrew Wilson just posted last night.
> Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
Yes, and ten minutes into it, "she" was back posting more drivel. All you kOOks are on the same hook, Paula.
> But do keep reading into things your wishful thinking and desperate
> hopes, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp, as we spank you to blisters.
> <snicker>
> >>> Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger. I have no plans > >>> to retire any time soon. I like what I'm doing, and my customers like > >>> what I'm doing.
> >> Those making less than minimum wage are seldom able to retire.
> >> <snicker>
> >> The only customers who like what you're doing are doing you:
> >> k52oab$ec...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
> >> <guffaw>
> No reply, Chimpy?
Whenever I don't reply... you can assume I don't really give a shit.
> >>>>>>> I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that > >>>>>>> out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on > >>>>>>> Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy > >>>>>>> yet.
> >>>>>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
> >>>>>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i.95h.1...@news.alt.net). Andrew
> >>>>>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
> >>>>>> I've made 137 posts for October to date, excluding tonight's posts
> >>>>>> (which you've not had a chance to reply to yet, as they've just been
> >>>>>> sent). The MIDs of my posts in which you'd replied to me:
> >>>>>> (45 / 137) * 100 = 32.85% actual response rate vs. your claimed 10%.
> >>>>>> I used my posts, so it was clear you were responding to me *and*
> >>>>>> reading what I wrote, contrary to your k'lame. You're replying to
> >>>>>> nearly every post I make that's directed at you. In short, I pwn you.
> >>>>>> And I've now proven you can't calculate percentages.
> >>>>>> Just so you know... you're at 935 posts for October to date (an
> >>>>>> average of 77.92 posts per day (163 yesterday, 107 today... so you're
> >>>>>> screeding far above even your higher than normal one-month rate, which
> >>>>>> is 2.614 times your historical rate), putting you on track to have
> >>>>>> your third screediest month ever), and you've now broken the 14
> >>>>>> minutes between posts barrier. Autofroth much, kook?
> >>>>>> How's that crappy less-than-minimum-wage job with no benefits going,
> >>>>>> fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Getting a lot of work done? No?
> >>>>>> That's alright... you're sucking hard at the welfare teat, eh? No need
> >>>>>> to work when you're a fat lazy dole bludging layabout like you.
> >>>>>> SPNAK!
> >>>>>> Yeah, yeah, yeah... text-wall. Spanking you sometimes requires
> >>>>>> actually typing something other than the truthy phrase "fat retarded
> >>>>>> drug-addicted chimp".
> >>>>>> <snicker>
> >>>>> Oh, I click on most of them and answer quite a few. I just don't bother > >>>>> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them.
> >>>> Which is why in the posts outlined above, you've replied point by > >>>> point,
> >>> Your homework assignment tonight, is to go through every one of those > >>> posts and support your claim that I've replied point by point in every > >>> one of them. Post your proof here, bitch, and be quick about it.
> >> You made the k'lame that you "don't bother to wade through 90% of the
> >> screed swamp that's in them",
> > Yes, I did.
> Again with the point by point reply... which doesn't exactly bolster
> your k'lame that you're not replying point by point, doesn't it.
> <snicker>
> >> so the impetus is upon you to prove
> > No, it's not.
> Yes, it is. As you've made a claim that is in direct opposition to
> reality, you'll have to back up that claim.
Paul, you're obviously trying to count the "non-blank" lines as text. I think that's what's confusing you. Ask Socky Nadiggah to explain what "non-blank" lines of text are.
> >> your
> >> k'lame, kook. I've already disproven your k'lame of ignoring 90% of my
> > No, you haven't.
> Oh, that's right, you get confused by simple math.
> <snicker>
> >> posts, the evidence is directly above.
> > No, it isn't.
> Yes, it is, you're just too stupid to understand it.
> >> But I see you're replying point by point in your reply now... kind of
> >> makes your kooky k'lames seem... kooky, eh?
> > No, it doesn't. This is one post out of many.
> One post out of many in which you've replied point by point.
> <snicker>
> >> Post your proof that you haven't been replying point by point here,
> >> bitch, and be quick about it.
> > Get stuffed, Paul... and be quick about it.
> Your running from providing proof for your k'lame is noted, fat
> retarded drug-addicted chimp.
> >> <snicker>
> >>>> right? You lying piece of shit who's now backpedaling furiously > >>>> in trying to escape yet another bootfuck.
> >>> You wanna see a good backpedal? Let's see how Nadiggah gets out of the > >>> corner I helped her paint herself into.
> >> You've been reduced to grammar lames. You're so ineffectual,
> >> effeminate and weak it'd be laughable if you weren't so pathetic.
> > Kindly point out the alleged grammar lame in this post, Paul. Do it now.
> > Oh, and tell that sock-bitch of yours to quit running from S/H/IT's > > spank...
> The grammar lame is in the thread you're referencing, which you just
> referenced again. Of course, your poor reading comprehension skills
> mean that you can't even understand what you wrote, so we're not
> surprised that you're arguing against yourself. Again.
> > it's not going to go away any time soon. I want to see many > > "non-blank" lines explaining how a ten-line post is really a one-line > > post. It seems that none of your socks can count or do simple math any > > better than you do.
> And again.
> <snicker>
> >>>>> See, this is like golf.
> >>>> This is nothing like golf.
> >>> Did... did you just try to argue with me, kOOk? I'm winning, for fuck's > >>> sake.
> >> No, you're not. Not in real life, not on usenet. You're a loser all
> >> around.
> > I know it would comfort you to think that. After all, you've been told > > you were a loser all your life. That's why you attempt to find solace in > > your imaginary perfect world. It's also why you're such a bitter, > > humorless, maladjusted, slimy little shit stain. Have a nice day...
> Nice fanfic, loser. Now get to screeding... be sure to do so all day
> and night, you've got a screeding record to break.
>> >> >>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the
>> >> >>> same stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's
>> >> >>> downright uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny
>> >> >>> about it.
>> >> >> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>> >> >> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet
>> >> >> again.
>> >> >> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your
>> >> >> nerves enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the
>> >> >> next day, you can get up and worry about your failing one-man
>> >> >> 'business' all over again.
>> >> >> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh,
>> >> >> that's right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make
>> >> >> enough to hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone
>> >> >> fund a retirement plan.
>> >> >> <snicker>
>> >> Above is where I touched a nerve.
>> > I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
>> Talking to your imaginary girlfriend again, kook? You really shouldn't
>> do that in public -- only in your bedroom with the curtains drawn and
>> your washcloth'o'shame at the ready. Don't forget to give "Paula" some
>> TLC with your bicycle pump first.
>> >> Below is where you cry out in pain.
>> > Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary
>> > perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me
>> > now.
>> Apparently, replying occasionally to your kooky posts to poke you into
>> spinning some more constitutes "hiding" now. Interesting. Have you
>> redefined any *other* words of the English language? You've got a ways
>> to go at that before you can catch up to Murphy and win a Goofy Azzed
>> Baboon Award, given his giant head start.
>> > She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she can't
>> > own up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky
>> > Andrew around lately either
>> I don't know any "socky Andrew", but Andrew Wilson made a handful of
>> posts several hours before you wrote the above, so I'll take it as your
>> tacit admission that Andrew Wilson is not a sock.
>> > and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to be in this anymore.
>> I think she's got someone new in her life, hence her near-absence the
>> last several weekends. But she's still quite active during the week.
>> Aren't you paying attention to what goes on around here, kook?
>> > You've got a little more staying power, but that's just your over-
>> > inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a WINNER, for
>> > fuck's sake!
>> He's already WON, for fuck's sake! Ferd's on the run and his lame "kook
>> awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people
>> and
>> stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes
> The people who vote in the REAL elections do so under the same nyms.
Yes, while in Ferd's fake awards there are all those [Tor] Google Groups posters that nobody's ever seen before.
Meanwhile, I notice I have you foaming so hard you keep changing the Subject: to say you hate me or foam in all caps when you reply to me. Thanks for those little tokens of my pwnership of you, kooky.
> Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you
> claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a ten-
> line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line" follow-
> up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically turned ten
> lines into one, you not only deleted all of the incriminating text in
> your reply, you invented something that you call "non-blank lines".
> You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. You
> may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every time just
> how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me, Nadiggah... just what
> are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count to ten?
Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the first one contained the SPNAK.
Now this post has only eleven lines of original text by me. I expect at least triple that in foamy response from you by nine-thirty. Get cracking!
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:59:44 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-
FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> "kook
>>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
>>stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
> Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot
There were no sock votes on the Official AUK ballot, kook; only on your pale imitation of one.
<nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had >only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the >first one contained the SPNAK.
MID, Paul?
>Now this post has only eleven lines of original text by me. I expect at >least triple that in foamy response from you by nine-thirty. Get cracking!
You still haven't explained the "non-blank" lines concept. Wait for
Kensi, as "she's" an ASStrophysicist.
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." -
Nellie Hall
KotAGoR XXXXI COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1 Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1 Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10 @'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1 eMutT lits o' hate #4 Lits Slut#10 Usenet Ruiner #3 Top Asshole On The Net #2 Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2. Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2 Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer of Rasta Khan, March 2006 Pierre Salinger HL&S January & February 2012
> >> >> >>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the
> >> >> >>> same stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's
> >> >> >>> downright uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny
> >> >> >>> about it.
> >> >> >> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
> >> >> >> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet
> >> >> >> again.
> >> >> >> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your
> >> >> >> nerves enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the
> >> >> >> next day, you can get up and worry about your failing one-man
> >> >> >> 'business' all over again.
> >> >> >> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh,
> >> >> >> that's right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make
> >> >> >> enough to hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone
> >> >> >> fund a retirement plan.
> >> >> >> <snicker>
> >> >> Above is where I touched a nerve.
> >> > I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
> >> Talking to your imaginary girlfriend again, kook? You really shouldn't
> >> do that in public -- only in your bedroom with the curtains drawn and
> >> your washcloth'o'shame at the ready. Don't forget to give "Paula" some
> >> TLC with your bicycle pump first.
> >> >> Below is where you cry out in pain.
> >> > Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary
> >> > perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me
> >> > now.
> >> Apparently, replying occasionally to your kooky posts to poke you into
> >> spinning some more constitutes "hiding" now. Interesting. Have you
> >> redefined any *other* words of the English language? You've got a ways
> >> to go at that before you can catch up to Murphy and win a Goofy Azzed
> >> Baboon Award, given his giant head start.
> >> > She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she can't
> >> > own up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky
> >> > Andrew around lately either
> >> I don't know any "socky Andrew", but Andrew Wilson made a handful of
> >> posts several hours before you wrote the above, so I'll take it as your
> >> tacit admission that Andrew Wilson is not a sock.
> >> > and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to be in this anymore.
> >> I think she's got someone new in her life, hence her near-absence the
> >> last several weekends. But she's still quite active during the week.
> >> Aren't you paying attention to what goes on around here, kook?
> >> > You've got a little more staying power, but that's just your over-
> >> > inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a WINNER, for
> >> > fuck's sake!
> >> He's already WON, for fuck's sake! Ferd's on the run and his lame "kook
> >> awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people
> >> and
> >> stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes
> > The people who vote in the REAL elections do so under the same nyms.
> Yes, while in Ferd's fake awards there are all those [Tor] Google Groups > posters that nobody's ever seen before.
> Meanwhile, I notice I have you foaming so hard you keep changing the > Subject: to say you hate me or foam in all caps when you reply to me. > Thanks for those little tokens of my pwnership of you, kooky.
I've noticed you keep running from a major spank that you wish would just go away. That isn't going to happen until I'm through with you.
> > Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you
> > claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a ten-
> > line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line" follow-
> > up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically turned ten
> > lines into one, you not only deleted all of the incriminating text in
> > your reply, you invented something that you call "non-blank lines".
> > You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. You
> > may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every time just
> > how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me, Nadiggah... just what
> > are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count to ten?
> Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had > only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the > first one contained the SPNAK.
Is that why you snipped it out of your reply when I brought your major math failure to your attention? Is that why you've been evading the issue as to your math incompetency ever since? Is that why you invented "non-blank" lines in a pathetic attempt to explain why you posted ten lines of text and called it one?
Oh, look! Here it is again! Let's count the lines, shall we? Of course we won't count the mid, but look! Starting with "SPNAK!" and ending with "<snicker>", how many lines of text do we have? It sure looks like ten to me. How many do YOU see, kOOky?
>> Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago,
>> kook?
>> I have some advice for you, Donut (so named because you're a big fat
>> zero): Stop lying. You're not good at it. You keep getting caught in
>> your lies and winding up with egg on your face. A smart person would
>> have realized he wasn't cut out for it and would have given up trying
>> to lie convincingly long ago. You, of course, are not a smart person,
>> so I'm having to tell you this instead of you figuring it out on your
>> own.
>> You're welcome, by the way.
>> <snicker>
[END HERE]
Also, would you please point out which are the "non-blank" lines of text that are somehow different from the one line of text you saw fit to count? Thanks so much, looking forward to your reply...
<nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:59:44 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-
>FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> "kook
>>>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people and
>>>stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google Groups
>> Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot
>There were no sock votes on the Official AUK ballot, kook; only on your >pale imitation of one.
You are a liar, Paul. Your goofy [Tard] Okie Greasemonkey
specifically noted on his fake ballot that socks are encouraged to
vote in your fake elections. Do you not read the stupid shit you
TetraTards post?
Oh, and I'd still like an explanation of that "non-blank lines"
concept. But I can understand why you would want to run from that
Checky Spank.
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." -
Nellie Hall
KotAGoR XXXXI COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1 Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1 Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10 @'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1 eMutT lits o' hate #4 Lits Slut#10 Usenet Ruiner #3 Top Asshole On The Net #2 Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2. Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2 Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer of Rasta Khan, March 2006 Pierre Salinger HL&S January & February 2012
> > In article <61cmaq.1i4.1...@news.alt.net>,
> > This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of > > Use <laugh...@u.kook> wrote:
> >> >> An tSin Gorm <chine.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > As I have such difficulty with this technical stuff, perhaps you > >> >> > > > > could
> >> >> > > > > kindly help me here? Please list the members of the Tetrarchy (I'm > >> >> > > > > not
> >> >> > > > > quite clear as to who exactly they are) and the Time Zones that > >> >> > > > > they
> >> >> > > > > post from. I'd hate to embark on fruitless research because I was
> >> >> > > > > chasing a red herring. Thanks!
> >> >> Oh my, that guy in the front looks really upset, is he the real one
> >> >> or is that someone else hiding behind him? Anyway, I wouldn't > >> >> want to meet /him/ down a dark alley, oh dear me no.
> >> > He looks upset because he has his master's hand up his puppet, moving his > >> > head > >> > and mouth and blinking the eyes.
>>> > > > > As I have such difficulty with this technical stuff, perhaps
>>> > > > > you could kindly help me here? Please list the members of the
>>> > > > > Tetrarchy (I'm not quite clear as to who exactly they are) and
>>> > > > > the Time Zones that they post from. I'd hate to embark on
>>> > > > > fruitless research because I was chasing a red herring.
>>> > > > > Thanks!
>>> Oh my, that guy in the front looks really upset, is he the real one or
>>> is that someone else hiding behind him? Anyway, I wouldn't want to
>>> meet /him/ down a dark alley, oh dear me no.
>> He looks upset because he has his master's hand up his puppet, moving
>> his head and mouth and blinking the eyes.
First, I goaded you into coming back here by insinuating that you'd lost your net access for cause, and now I've got you screeding not just textual fanfic but fictional pictures. At this rate, it won't be long before I get you to slave for hours making another tribute video about the Tetrarchy.
>> >> >> >>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say
>> >> >> >>> the same stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. >> >> >> >>> It's downright uncanny... I mean there's nothing even
>> >> >> >>> remotely canny about it.
>> >> >> >> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted
>> >> >> >> chimp?
>> >> >> >> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet
>> >> >> >> again.
>> >> >> >> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your
>> >> >> >> nerves enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the
>> >> >> >> next day, you can get up and worry about your failing one-man
>> >> >> >> 'business' all over again.
>> >> >> >> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh,
>> >> >> >> that's right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even
>> >> >> >> make enough to hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let
>> >> >> >> alone fund a retirement plan.
>> >> >> >> <snicker>
>> >> >> Above is where I touched a nerve.
>> >> > I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
>> >> Talking to your imaginary girlfriend again, kook? You really
>> >> shouldn't do that in public -- only in your bedroom with the
>> >> curtains drawn and your washcloth'o'shame at the ready. Don't forget
>> >> to give "Paula" some TLC with your bicycle pump first.
>> >> >> Below is where you cry out in pain.
>> >> > Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your
>> >> > imaginary perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's
>> >> > hiding from me now.
>> >> Apparently, replying occasionally to your kooky posts to poke you
>> >> into spinning some more constitutes "hiding" now. Interesting. Have
>> >> you redefined any *other* words of the English language? You've got
>> >> a ways to go at that before you can catch up to Murphy and win a
>> >> Goofy Azzed Baboon Award, given his giant head start.
>> >> > She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she
>> >> > can't own up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't
>> >> > seen socky Andrew around lately either
>> >> I don't know any "socky Andrew", but Andrew Wilson made a handful of
>> >> posts several hours before you wrote the above, so I'll take it as
>> >> your tacit admission that Andrew Wilson is not a sock.
>> >> > and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to be in this
>> >> > anymore.
>> >> I think she's got someone new in her life, hence her near-absence
>> >> the last several weekends. But she's still quite active during the
>> >> week. Aren't you paying attention to what goes on around here, kook?
>> >> > You've got a little more staying power, but that's just your over-
>> >> > inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a WINNER, for
>> >> > fuck's sake!
>> >> He's already WON, for fuck's sake! Ferd's on the run and his lame
>> >> "kook awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious
>> >> people and
>> >> stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes
>> > The people who vote in the REAL elections do so under the same nyms.
>> Yes, while in Ferd's fake awards there are all those [Tor] Google
>> Groups posters that nobody's ever seen before.
>> Meanwhile, I notice I have you foaming so hard you keep changing the
>> Subject: to say you hate me or foam in all caps when you reply to me.
>> Thanks for those little tokens of my pwnership of you, kooky.
> I've noticed you keep running from a major spank that you wish would
> just go away. That isn't going to happen until I'm through with you.
>> > Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you
>> > claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a
>> > ten- line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line"
>> > follow- up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically
>> > turned ten lines into one, you not only deleted all of the
>> > incriminating text in your reply, you invented something that you
>> > call "non-blank lines".
>> > You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. >> > You may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every
>> > time just how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me,
>> > Nadiggah... just what are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count
>> > to ten?
>> Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had
>> only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the
>> first one contained the SPNAK.
> Is that why you snipped it out of your reply when I brought your major
> math failure to your attention? Is that why you've been evading the
> issue as to your math incompetency ever since? Is that why you invented
> "non-blank" lines in a pathetic attempt to explain why you posted ten
> lines of text and called it one?
> Oh, look! Here it is again! Let's count the lines, shall we? Of
> course we won't count the mid, but look! Starting with "SPNAK!" and
> ending with "<snicker>", how many lines of text do we have? It sure
> looks like ten to me. How many do YOU see, kOOky?
>>> Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago,
>>> kook?
>>> I have some advice for you, Donut (so named because you're a big fat
>>> zero): Stop lying. You're not good at it. You keep getting caught in
>>> your lies and winding up with egg on your face. A smart person would
>>> have realized he wasn't cut out for it and would have given up trying
>>> to lie convincingly long ago. You, of course, are not a smart person,
>>> so I'm having to tell you this instead of you figuring it out on your
>>> own.
>>> You're welcome, by the way.
>>> <snicker>
> [END HERE]
> Also, would you please point out which are the "non-blank" lines of text
> that are somehow different from the one line of text you saw fit to
> count? Thanks so much, looking forward to your reply...
That's not the post I was talking about, you idiot.
Here, I'll recap things for you, since you're too retarded to figure it out on your own.
First, Johnny Donut the Big Fat Zero made the following k'lame, in <XnsA0EAD1C515123ScourgeOfUse...@208.90.168.18>:
|> First, check out what kensi said:
|> |>> I'm going to be mostly offline from about 10 minutes from now until
|>> Monday afternoon having a much nicer weekend than any k00k can aspire
|>> to. Adios!
|>> |>> *snicker*
|> |> Good thing you mentioned that, or I probably wouldn't have noticed.
|> Make sure you come back and entertain us Monday afternoon. Oh... and
|> try to be sober by then, okay?
|
| The Sock is serving weekends in the county jail for writing checks its
| pea-brain can't cash.
This, along with a similar k'lame by Ferd, was disproved later when kensi posted an article with message-ID <k5anid$ee...@speranza.aioe.org> some time later (but still during the weekend).
When I later had seen both posts, I wrote a reply to Johnny Donut the Big Fat Zero, <k5aos7$ja...@dont-email.me>, with:
| Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago, kook?
|
| <k5anid$ee...@speranza.aioe.org>
That reply of mine is the post that you quoted above and seem to think is the one whose line count is in dispute. But it's not. Read on.
In response to it, you posted <617en3.aj.1...@news.alt.net>:
| Did... did you just prove that Kensi's still screeding on Usenet
My next post, which is the one you took issue with, has the message-ID <k5apl7$ja...@dont-email.me>:
| BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as "screeding", you
| ridiculous buffoon.
|> BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as "screeding", you
|> ridiculous buffoon.
|
| Now I'm confused. Wasn't that supposed to be a quote from her giving
| advice to a donut? I counted ten lines... but then you guys do math a
| little differently.
Here is kensi's post, <k5anid$ee...@speranza.aioe.org>, the one whose line count is at issue -- the entire post body:
| On 12/10/2012 10:36 PM, Fred Hall wrote:
| > Eventually.
...
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:25:05 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:59:44 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-
>>FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>> <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>> "kook
>>>>awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious people
>>>>and stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes via Tor + Google
>>>>Groups
>>> Where is the proof sock votes were counted on the Official AUK ballot
>>There were no sock votes on the Official AUK ballot, kook; only on your
>>pale imitation of one.
> You are a liar, Paul. Your goofy [Tard] Okie Greasemonkey specifically
> noted on his fake ballot that socks are encouraged to vote in your fake
> elections. Do you not read the stupid shit you TetraTards post?
Your errors above are numerous. Here is a detailed breakdown of them:
1. My name is not Paul.
2. His name is not [Tard] Okie Greasemonkey.
3. His ballot is not the fake one -- yours is.
4. It's awards, not an election, and it's not the fake one -- yours is.
5. We're the Tetrarchy, not the "TetraTards".
6. None of what we write is "stupid shit".
And last, but not least,
7. Noting that socks are encouraged to vote is not the same thing as you
proving that any actual socks did actually vote.
Meanwhile, your continuing failure to address the matter of the obvious GG socks voting in your fake awards has been noted, kook.
> Oh, and I'd still like an explanation of that "non-blank lines"
> concept.
Stalemate has just received his epic spank on that matter. I waited a while before posting it, because Stalemate's behavior meant that the spnak would be bigger the longer I waited. Now, his goose is cooked. The explanation you seek is in my epic spank of Stalemate, which is posted somewhere else in this thread.
Fetch, boy!
<snicker>
> But I can understand why you would want to run from that Checky Spank.
Why would I want to run from the epic spank I just dished out to that kook, you brainless kook?
>> >>> > > > > As I have such difficulty with this technical stuff,
>> >>> > > > > perhaps you could kindly help me here? Please list the
>> >>> > > > > members of the Tetrarchy (I'm not quite clear as to who
>> >>> > > > > exactly they are) and the Time Zones that they post from.
>> >>> > > > > I'd hate to embark on fruitless research because I was
>> >>> > > > > chasing a red herring. Thanks!
>> >>> Oh my, that guy in the front looks really upset, is he the real one
>> >>> or is that someone else hiding behind him? Anyway, I wouldn't want
>> >>> to meet /him/ down a dark alley, oh dear me no.
>> >> He looks upset because he has his master's hand up his puppet,
>> >> moving his head and mouth and blinking the eyes.
>> First, I goaded you into coming back here by insinuating that you'd
>> lost your net access for cause, and now I've got you screeding not just
>> textual fanfic but fictional pictures. At this rate, it won't be long
>> before I get you to slave for hours making another tribute video about
>> the Tetrarchy.
> <snicker>
> Nads doesn't know about the three shells.
> <snicker>
> <snicker>
Your non sequitur paraphrasing from a Sylvester Stallone movie is noted. I do suppose I have one thing in common with the original subject of that line: I'm kicking bad-guy ass and will not be defeated. He, too, was *winning*, for fuck's sake.
<snicker>
And now, since it's half past eleven, I really must be getting to bed. You go ahead and foam some more while I catch some z's, so I'll have some fresh kookposts to rip to shreds tomorrow after work.
> >> >> >> >>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say
> >> >> >> >>> the same stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. > >> >> >> >>> It's downright uncanny... I mean there's nothing even
> >> >> >> >>> remotely canny about it.
> >> >> >> >> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted
> >> >> >> >> chimp?
> >> >> >> >> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet
> >> >> >> >> again.
> >> >> >> >> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your
> >> >> >> >> nerves enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the
> >> >> >> >> next day, you can get up and worry about your failing one-man
> >> >> >> >> 'business' all over again.
> >> >> >> >> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh,
> >> >> >> >> that's right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even
> >> >> >> >> make enough to hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let
> >> >> >> >> alone fund a retirement plan.
> >> >> >> >> <snicker>
> >> >> >> Above is where I touched a nerve.
> >> >> > I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
> >> >> Talking to your imaginary girlfriend again, kook? You really
> >> >> shouldn't do that in public -- only in your bedroom with the
> >> >> curtains drawn and your washcloth'o'shame at the ready. Don't forget
> >> >> to give "Paula" some TLC with your bicycle pump first.
> >> >> >> Below is where you cry out in pain.
> >> >> > Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your
> >> >> > imaginary perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's
> >> >> > hiding from me now.
> >> >> Apparently, replying occasionally to your kooky posts to poke you
> >> >> into spinning some more constitutes "hiding" now. Interesting. Have
> >> >> you redefined any *other* words of the English language? You've got
> >> >> a ways to go at that before you can catch up to Murphy and win a
> >> >> Goofy Azzed Baboon Award, given his giant head start.
> >> >> > She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she
> >> >> > can't own up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't
> >> >> > seen socky Andrew around lately either
> >> >> I don't know any "socky Andrew", but Andrew Wilson made a handful of
> >> >> posts several hours before you wrote the above, so I'll take it as
> >> >> your tacit admission that Andrew Wilson is not a sock.
> >> >> > and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to be in this
> >> >> > anymore.
> >> >> I think she's got someone new in her life, hence her near-absence
> >> >> the last several weekends. But she's still quite active during the
> >> >> week. Aren't you paying attention to what goes on around here, kook?
> >> >> > You've got a little more staying power, but that's just your over-
> >> >> > inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a WINNER, for
> >> >> > fuck's sake!
> >> >> He's already WON, for fuck's sake! Ferd's on the run and his lame
> >> >> "kook awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious
> >> >> people and
> >> >> stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes
> >> > The people who vote in the REAL elections do so under the same nyms.
> >> Yes, while in Ferd's fake awards there are all those [Tor] Google
> >> Groups posters that nobody's ever seen before.
> >> Meanwhile, I notice I have you foaming so hard you keep changing the
> >> Subject: to say you hate me or foam in all caps when you reply to me.
> >> Thanks for those little tokens of my pwnership of you, kooky.
> > I've noticed you keep running from a major spank that you wish would
> > just go away. That isn't going to happen until I'm through with you.
> >> > Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you
> >> > claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a
> >> > ten- line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line"
> >> > follow- up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically
> >> > turned ten lines into one, you not only deleted all of the
> >> > incriminating text in your reply, you invented something that you
> >> > call "non-blank lines".
> >> > You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. > >> > You may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every
> >> > time just how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me,
> >> > Nadiggah... just what are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count
> >> > to ten?
> >> Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had
> >> only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the
> >> first one contained the SPNAK.
> > Is that why you snipped it out of your reply when I brought your major
> > math failure to your attention? Is that why you've been evading the
> > issue as to your math incompetency ever since? Is that why you invented
> > "non-blank" lines in a pathetic attempt to explain why you posted ten
> > lines of text and called it one?
> > Oh, look! Here it is again! Let's count the lines, shall we? Of
> > course we won't count the mid, but look! Starting with "SPNAK!" and
> > ending with "<snicker>", how many lines of text do we have? It sure
> > looks like ten to me. How many do YOU see, kOOky?
> >>> Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago,
> >>> kook?
> >>> I have some advice for you, Donut (so named because you're a big fat
> >>> zero): Stop lying. You're not good at it. You keep getting caught in
> >>> your lies and winding up with egg on your face. A smart person would
> >>> have realized he wasn't cut out for it and would have given up trying
> >>> to lie convincingly long ago. You, of course, are not a smart person,
> >>> so I'm having to tell you this instead of you figuring it out on your
> >>> own.
> >>> You're welcome, by the way.
> >>> <snicker>
> > [END HERE]
> > Also, would you please point out which are the "non-blank" lines of text
> > that are somehow different from the one line of text you saw fit to
> > count? Thanks so much, looking forward to your reply...
> That's not the post I was talking about, you idiot.
> Here, I'll recap things for you, since you're too retarded to figure it > out on your own.
> First, Johnny Donut the Big Fat Zero made the following k'lame, in > <XnsA0EAD1C515123ScourgeOfUse...@208.90.168.18>:
Who's "Johnny Donut," kOOk? There's no one here posting under that name.
> |> First, check out what kensi said:
> |> > |>> I'm going to be mostly offline from about 10 minutes from now until
> |>> Monday afternoon having a much nicer weekend than any k00k can aspire
> |>> to. Adios!
> |>> > |>> *snicker*
> |> > |> Good thing you mentioned that, or I probably wouldn't have noticed.
> |> Make sure you come back and entertain us Monday afternoon. Oh... and
> |> try to be sober by then, okay?
> |
> | The Sock is serving weekends in the county jail for writing checks its
> | pea-brain can't cash.
> This, along with a similar k'lame by Ferd, was disproved later when kensi > posted an article with message-ID <k5anid$ee...@speranza.aioe.org> some > time later (but still during the weekend).
> When I later had seen both posts, I wrote a reply to Johnny Donut the Big > Fat Zero, <k5aos7$ja...@dont-email.me>, with:
Who's "Johnny Donut," kOOk? There's no one here posting under that name.
>>>> >> >> >>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say
>>>> >> >> >>> the same stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. >>>> >> >> >>> It's downright uncanny... I mean there's nothing even
>>>> >> >> >>> remotely canny about it.
>>>> >> >> >> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted
>>>> >> >> >> chimp?
>>>> >> >> >> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet
>>>> >> >> >> again.
>>>> >> >> >> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your
>>>> >> >> >> nerves enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the
>>>> >> >> >> next day, you can get up and worry about your failing one-man
>>>> >> >> >> 'business' all over again.
>>>> >> >> >> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh,
>>>> >> >> >> that's right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even
>>>> >> >> >> make enough to hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let
>>>> >> >> >> alone fund a retirement plan.
>>>> >> >> >> <snicker>
>>>> >> >> Above is where I touched a nerve.
>>>> >> > I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
>>>> >> Talking to your imaginary girlfriend again, kook? You really
>>>> >> shouldn't do that in public -- only in your bedroom with the
>>>> >> curtains drawn and your washcloth'o'shame at the ready. Don't forget
>>>> >> to give "Paula" some TLC with your bicycle pump first.
>>>> >> >> Below is where you cry out in pain.
>>>> >> > Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your
>>>> >> > imaginary perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's
>>>> >> > hiding from me now.
>>>> >> Apparently, replying occasionally to your kooky posts to poke you
>>>> >> into spinning some more constitutes "hiding" now. Interesting. Have
>>>> >> you redefined any *other* words of the English language? You've got
>>>> >> a ways to go at that before you can catch up to Murphy and win a
>>>> >> Goofy Azzed Baboon Award, given his giant head start.
>>>> >> > She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she
>>>> >> > can't own up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't
>>>> >> > seen socky Andrew around lately either
>>>> >> I don't know any "socky Andrew", but Andrew Wilson made a handful of
>>>> >> posts several hours before you wrote the above, so I'll take it as
>>>> >> your tacit admission that Andrew Wilson is not a sock.
>>>> >> > and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to be in this
>>>> >> > anymore.
>>>> >> I think she's got someone new in her life, hence her near-absence
>>>> >> the last several weekends. But she's still quite active during the
>>>> >> week. Aren't you paying attention to what goes on around here, kook?
>>>> >> > You've got a little more staying power, but that's just your over-
>>>> >> > inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a WINNER, for
>>>> >> > fuck's sake!
>>>> >> He's already WON, for fuck's sake! Ferd's on the run and his lame
>>>> >> "kook awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious
>>>> >> people and
>>>> >> stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes
>>>> > The people who vote in the REAL elections do so under the same nyms.
>>>> Yes, while in Ferd's fake awards there are all those [Tor] Google
>>>> Groups posters that nobody's ever seen before.
>>>> Meanwhile, I notice I have you foaming so hard you keep changing the
>>>> Subject: to say you hate me or foam in all caps when you reply to me.
>>>> Thanks for those little tokens of my pwnership of you, kooky.
>>> I've noticed you keep running from a major spank that you wish would
>>> just go away. That isn't going to happen until I'm through with you.
>>>> > Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you
>>>> > claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a
>>>> > ten- line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line"
>>>> > follow- up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically
>>>> > turned ten lines into one, you not only deleted all of the
>>>> > incriminating text in your reply, you invented something that you
>>>> > call "non-blank lines".
>>>> > You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. >>>> > You may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every
>>>> > time just how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me,
>>>> > Nadiggah... just what are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count
>>>> > to ten?
>>>> Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had
>>>> only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the
>>>> first one contained the SPNAK.
>>> Is that why you snipped it out of your reply when I brought your major
>>> math failure to your attention? Is that why you've been evading the
>>> issue as to your math incompetency ever since? Is that why you invented
>>> "non-blank" lines in a pathetic attempt to explain why you posted ten
>>> lines of text and called it one?
>>> Oh, look! Here it is again! Let's count the lines, shall we? Of
>>> course we won't count the mid, but look! Starting with "SPNAK!" and
>>> ending with "<snicker>", how many lines of text do we have? It sure
>>> looks like ten to me. How many do YOU see, kOOky?
>>>>> Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago,
>>>>> kook?
>>>>> I have some advice for you, Donut (so named because you're a big fat
>>>>> zero): Stop lying. You're not good at it. You keep getting caught in
>>>>> your lies and winding up with egg on your face. A smart person would
>>>>> have realized he wasn't cut out for it and would have given up trying
>>>>> to lie convincingly long ago. You, of course, are not a smart person,
>>>>> so I'm having to tell you this instead of you figuring it out on your
>>>>> own.
>>>>> You're welcome, by the way.
>>>>> <snicker>
>>> [END HERE]
>>> Also, would you please point out which are the "non-blank" lines of text
>>> that are somehow different from the one line of text you saw fit to
>>> count? Thanks so much, looking forward to your reply...
>> That's not the post I was talking about, you idiot.
>> Here, I'll recap things for you, since you're too retarded to figure it >> out on your own.
>> First, Johnny Donut the Big Fat Zero made the following k'lame, in >> <XnsA0EAD1C515123ScourgeOfUse...@208.90.168.18>:
> Who's "Johnny Donut," kOOk? There's no one here posting under that name.
#9! #9!! That's a #9!!! Where the profoundly retarded masturbating
monkey?! Somebody get the profoundly retarded masturbating monkey!
>> |> First, check out what kensi said:
>> |> >> |>> I'm going to be mostly offline from about 10 minutes from now until
>> |>> Monday afternoon having a much nicer weekend than any k00k can aspire
>> |>> to. Adios!
>> |>> >> |>> *snicker*
>> |> >> |> Good thing you mentioned that, or I probably wouldn't have noticed.
>> |> Make sure you come back and entertain us Monday afternoon. Oh... and
>> |> try to be sober by then, okay?
>> |
>> | The Sock is serving weekends in the county jail for writing checks its
>> | pea-brain can't cash.
>> This, along with a similar k'lame by Ferd, was disproved later when kensi >> posted an article with message-ID <k5anid$ee...@speranza.aioe.org> some >> time later (but still during the weekend).
>> When I later had seen both posts, I wrote a reply to Johnny Donut the Big >> Fat Zero, <k5aos7$ja...@dont-email.me>, with:
> Who's "Johnny Donut," kOOk? There's no one here posting under that name.
Profoundly retarded masturbating monkey, please pick up the white
...
>>> >> >> >>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say
>>> >> >> >>> the same stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. >>> >> >> >>> It's downright uncanny... I mean there's nothing even
>>> >> >> >>> remotely canny about it.
>>> >> >> >> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted
>>> >> >> >> chimp?
>>> >> >> >> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet
>>> >> >> >> again.
>>> >> >> >> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your
>>> >> >> >> nerves enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the
>>> >> >> >> next day, you can get up and worry about your failing one-man
>>> >> >> >> 'business' all over again.
>>> >> >> >> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh,
>>> >> >> >> that's right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even
>>> >> >> >> make enough to hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let
>>> >> >> >> alone fund a retirement plan.
>>> >> >> >> <snicker>
>>> >> >> Above is where I touched a nerve.
>>> >> > I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
>>> >> Talking to your imaginary girlfriend again, kook? You really
>>> >> shouldn't do that in public -- only in your bedroom with the
>>> >> curtains drawn and your washcloth'o'shame at the ready. Don't forget
>>> >> to give "Paula" some TLC with your bicycle pump first.
>>> >> >> Below is where you cry out in pain.
>>> >> > Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your
>>> >> > imaginary perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's
>>> >> > hiding from me now.
>>> >> Apparently, replying occasionally to your kooky posts to poke you
>>> >> into spinning some more constitutes "hiding" now. Interesting. Have
>>> >> you redefined any *other* words of the English language? You've got
>>> >> a ways to go at that before you can catch up to Murphy and win a
>>> >> Goofy Azzed Baboon Award, given his giant head start.
>>> >> > She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she
>>> >> > can't own up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't
>>> >> > seen socky Andrew around lately either
>>> >> I don't know any "socky Andrew", but Andrew Wilson made a handful of
>>> >> posts several hours before you wrote the above, so I'll take it as
>>> >> your tacit admission that Andrew Wilson is not a sock.
>>> >> > and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to be in this
>>> >> > anymore.
>>> >> I think she's got someone new in her life, hence her near-absence
>>> >> the last several weekends. But she's still quite active during the
>>> >> week. Aren't you paying attention to what goes on around here, kook?
>>> >> > You've got a little more staying power, but that's just your over-
>>> >> > inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a WINNER, for
>>> >> > fuck's sake!
>>> >> He's already WON, for fuck's sake! Ferd's on the run and his lame
>>> >> "kook awards" are reduced to padding with nominations of fictitious
>>> >> people and
>>> >> stuffing the ballot box with sockpuppet votes
>>> > The people who vote in the REAL elections do so under the same nyms.
>>> Yes, while in Ferd's fake awards there are all those [Tor] Google
>>> Groups posters that nobody's ever seen before.
>>> Meanwhile, I notice I have you foaming so hard you keep changing the
>>> Subject: to say you hate me or foam in all caps when you reply to me.
>>> Thanks for those little tokens of my pwnership of you, kooky.
>> I've noticed you keep running from a major spank that you wish would
>> just go away. That isn't going to happen until I'm through with you.
>>> > Of course hypocrisy is what you Derbyshit socks know best. Like you
>>> > claiming *I'm* the one with the shitty math skills, when you post a
>>> > ten- line follow-up article by Kensi, and identify it as a "one-line"
>>> > follow- up. That's why, when I pressed you about how you magically
>>> > turned ten lines into one, you not only deleted all of the
>>> > incriminating text in your reply, you invented something that you
>>> > call "non-blank lines".
>>> > You're spanked as long as you continue to run from this, Nadiggah. >>> > You may continue to reply to me, but I'm going to remind you every
>>> > time just how badly you self-spanked yourself. So tell me,
>>> > Nadiggah... just what are "non-blank" lines, and why can't you count
>>> > to ten?
>>> Nice kookfoam. Meanwhile, it remains the case that that kensi post had
>>> only three lines that weren't either quoted or blank, and of those, the
>>> first one contained the SPNAK.
>> Is that why you snipped it out of your reply when I brought your major
>> math failure to your attention? Is that why you've been evading the
>> issue as to your math incompetency ever since? Is that why you invented
>> "non-blank" lines in a pathetic attempt to explain why you posted ten
>> lines of text and called it one?
>> Oh, look! Here it is again! Let's count the lines, shall we? Of
>> course we won't count the mid, but look! Starting with "SPNAK!" and
>> ending with "<snicker>", how many lines of text do we have? It sure
>> looks like ten to me. How many do YOU see, kOOky?
>>>> Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago,
>>>> kook?
>>>> I have some advice for you, Donut (so named because you're a big fat
>>>> zero): Stop lying. You're not good at it. You keep getting caught in
>>>> your lies and winding up with egg on your face. A smart person would
>>>> have realized he wasn't cut out for it and would have given up trying
>>>> to lie convincingly long ago. You, of course, are not a smart person,
>>>> so I'm having to tell you this instead of you figuring it out on your
>>>> own.
>>>> You're welcome, by the way.
>>>> <snicker>
>> [END HERE]
>> Also, would you please point out which are the "non-blank" lines of text
>> that are somehow different from the one line of text you saw fit to
>> count? Thanks so much, looking forward to your reply...
> That's not the post I was talking about, you idiot.
> Here, I'll recap things for you, since you're too retarded to figure it > out on your own.
> First, Johnny Donut the Big Fat Zero made the following k'lame, in > <XnsA0EAD1C515123ScourgeOfUse...@208.90.168.18>:
> |> First, check out what kensi said:
> |> > |>> I'm going to be mostly offline from about 10 minutes from now until
> |>> Monday afternoon having a much nicer weekend than any k00k can aspire
> |>> to. Adios!
> |>> > |>> *snicker*
> |> > |> Good thing you mentioned that, or I probably wouldn't have noticed.
> |> Make sure you come back and entertain us Monday afternoon. Oh... and
> |> try to be sober by then, okay?
> |
> | The Sock is serving weekends in the county jail for writing checks its
> | pea-brain can't cash.
> This, along with a similar k'lame by Ferd, was disproved later when kensi > posted an article with message-ID <k5anid$ee...@speranza.aioe.org> some > time later (but still during the weekend).
> When I later had seen both posts, I wrote a reply to Johnny Donut the Big > Fat Zero, <k5aos7$ja...@dont-email.me>, with:
> | Oh, really? Then why did she post this less than half an hour ago, kook?
> |
> | <k5anid$ee...@speranza.aioe.org>
> That reply of mine is the post that you quoted above and seem to think is > the one whose line count is in dispute. But it's not. Read on.
> In response to it, you posted <617en3.aj.1...@news.alt.net>:
> | Did... did you just prove that Kensi's still screeding on Usenet
> My next post, which is the one you took issue with, has the message-ID > <k5apl7$ja...@dont-email.me>:
> | BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as "screeding", you
> | ridiculous buffoon.
> You responded with <617g7s.aj.1...@news.alt.net>:
> |> BTW, her one-line followup hardly qualifies as
>>> In article <61cmaq.1i4.1...@news.alt.net>,
>>> This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of >>> Use <laugh...@u.kook> wrote:
>>>> > In article <1kryugf.ngco8jsmov6eN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>,
>>>> > sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) wrote:
>>>> >> An tSin Gorm <chine.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > As I have such difficulty with this technical stuff, perhaps you >>>> >> > > > > could
>>>> >> > > > > kindly help me here? Please list the members of the Tetrarchy (I'm >>>> >> > > > > not
>>>> >> > > > > quite clear as to who exactly they are) and the Time Zones that >>>> >> > > > > they
>>>> >> > > > > post from. I'd hate to embark on fruitless research because I was
>>>> >> > > > > chasing a red herring. Thanks!
>>>> >> Oh my, that guy in the front looks really upset, is he the real one
>>>> >> or is that someone else hiding behind him? Anyway, I wouldn't >>>> >> want to meet /him/ down a dark alley, oh dear me no.
>>>> > He looks upset because he has his master's hand up his puppet, moving his >>>> > head >>>> > and mouth and blinking the eyes.
>>> Can you grunt like a pig? Can you? Can you? Let me hear you grunt like a pig.
>> Well, okay, but you'll have to take me to dinner and a show first.
> I thought it was "squeal" like a pig.
That's only when your dates are from Georgia, fat retarded
drug-addicted chimp. Do you get paid extra if your squealing is
realistic enough? Can chimps squeal like pigs?
Let's bring in an expert on this... Alex "World's Ugliest Lawn Gnome"
Cain, if Chimpy were to squeal convincingly enough for you, would you
pay him extra from the weekly allowance that Mommy gives you?
<snicker>
--
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
>>>>>>>>> I skip over 90% of the tard ramblings... are you just now figuring that >>>>>>>>> out? You are the fattest, most retarded, knuckle-dragging chimp on >>>>>>>>> Usenet. Oh, and you obviously haven't mastered your newsreader thingy >>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>> Let's put your 90% claim to the test, since you've also stated you
>>>>>>>> don't read 90% of my posts (614k7i.95h.1...@news.alt.net). Andrew
>>>>>>>> Wilson can do the same to prove you wrong, when he posts.
>>>>>>>> I've made 137 posts for October to date, excluding tonight's posts
>>>>>>>> (which you've not had a chance to reply to yet, as they've just been
>>>>>>>> sent). The MIDs of my posts in which you'd replied to me:
>>>>>>>> (45 / 137) * 100 = 32.85% actual response rate vs. your claimed 10%.
>>>>>>>> I used my posts, so it was clear you were responding to me *and*
>>>>>>>> reading what I wrote, contrary to your k'lame. You're replying to
>>>>>>>> nearly every post I make that's directed at you. In short, I pwn you.
>>>>>>>> And I've now proven you can't calculate percentages.
>>>>>>>> Just so you know... you're at 935 posts for October to date (an
>>>>>>>> average of 77.92 posts per day (163 yesterday, 107 today... so you're
>>>>>>>> screeding far above even your higher than normal one-month rate, which
>>>>>>>> is 2.614 times your historical rate), putting you on track to have
>>>>>>>> your third screediest month ever), and you've now broken the 14
>>>>>>>> minutes between posts barrier. Autofroth much, kook?
>>>>>>>> How's that crappy less-than-minimum-wage job with no benefits going,
>>>>>>>> fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Getting a lot of work done? No?
>>>>>>>> That's alright... you're sucking hard at the welfare teat, eh? No need
>>>>>>>> to work when you're a fat lazy dole bludging layabout like you.
>>>>>>>> SPNAK!
>>>>>>>> Yeah, yeah, yeah... text-wall. Spanking you sometimes requires
>>>>>>>> actually typing something other than the truthy phrase "fat retarded
>>>>>>>> drug-addicted chimp".
>>>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>>> Oh, I click on most of them and answer quite a few. I just don't bother >>>>>>> to wade through 90% of the screed swamp that's in them.
>>>>>> Which is why in the posts outlined above, you've replied point by >>>>>> point,
>>>>> Your homework assignment tonight, is to go through every one of those >>>>> posts and support your claim that I've replied point by point in every >>>>> one of them. Post your proof here, bitch, and be quick about it.
>>>> You made the k'lame that you "don't bother to wade through 90% of the
>>>> screed swamp that's in them",
>>> Yes, I did.
>> Again with the point by point reply... which doesn't exactly bolster
>> your k'lame that you're not replying point by point, doesn't it.
>> <snicker>
No reply, Chimpy? What a coward. <guffaw>
>>>> so the impetus is upon you to prove
>>> No, it's not.
>> Yes, it is. As you've made a claim that is in direct opposition to
>> reality, you'll have to back up that claim.
> Paul, you're obviously trying to count the "non-blank" lines as text. I > think that's what's confusing you. Ask Socky Nadiggah to explain what > "non-blank" lines of text are.
Your continuing cowardice in not providing any evidence to back up
your retarded k'lame is noted, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp.
<snicker>
>>>> your
>>>> k'lame, kook. I've already disproven your k'lame of ignoring 90% of my
>>> No, you haven't.
>> Oh, that's right, you get confused by simple math.
>> <snicker>
No reply, Chimpy? Keep running from your spanks, and you'll earn
yourself some cowardice-oriented kook awards. <chortle>
>>>> posts, the evidence is directly above.
>>> No, it isn't.
>> Yes, it is, you're just too stupid to understand it.
Your tacit admission to being too stupid to understand the evidence
presented directly above is noted, Chimpy. <chuckle>
>>>> But I see you're replying point by point in your reply now... kind of
>>>> makes your kooky k'lames seem... kooky, eh?
>>> No, it doesn't. This is one post out of many.
>> One post out of many in which you've replied point by point.
>> <snicker>
Your tacit admission to replying point by point in many posts is
noted, Chimpy. <sniggle>
>>>> Post your proof that you haven't been replying point by point here,
>>>> bitch, and be quick about it.
>>> Get stuffed, Paul... and be quick about it.
>> Your running from providing proof for your k'lame is noted, fat
>> retarded drug-addicted chimp.
Your continued running from providing proof for your k'lame that you
haven't been replying point by point is noted, fat retarded
drug-addicted chimp.
>>>>>> right? You lying piece of shit who's now backpedaling furiously >>>>>> in trying to escape yet another bootfuck.
>>>>> You wanna see a good backpedal? Let's see how Nadiggah gets out of the >>>>> corner I helped her paint herself into.
>>>> You've been reduced to grammar lames. You're so ineffectual,
>>>> effeminate and weak it'd be laughable if you weren't so pathetic.
>>> Kindly point out the alleged grammar lame in this post, Paul. Do it now.
>>> Oh, and tell that sock-bitch of yours to quit running from S/H/IT's >>> spank...
>> The grammar lame is in the thread you're referencing, which you just
>> referenced again. Of course, your poor reading comprehension skills
>> mean that you can't even understand what you wrote, so we're not
>> surprised that you're arguing against yourself. Again.
Your tacit admission to arguing against yourself, and your cowardice
in not refuting the above point is noted, Chimpy. <LOL>
>>> it's not going to go away any time soon. I want to see many >>> "non-blank" lines explaining how a ten-line post is really a one-line >>> post. It seems that none of your socks can count or do simple math any >>> better than you do.
>>>>>>> It's like they all hang out together, think alike, and say the same >>>>>>> stupid shit. Oh, and they all quack like a duck. It's downright >>>>>>> uncanny... I mean there's nothing even remotely canny about it.
>>>>>> Getting a good night's sleep, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp?
>>>>>> No, no you're not... you're up all night screeding to usenet again.
>>>>>> Try taking a whole handful of Xanax... maybe that'll calm your nerves >>>>>> enough that you can drop into a fitful sleep. Then the next day, you >>>>>> can get up and worry about your failing one-man 'business' all over >>>>>> again.
>>>>>> Why can't you retire, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp? Oh, that's >>>>>> right... your crappy one-man 'business' doesn't even make enough to >>>>>> hire a minimum wage monkey to do the work, let alone fund a retirement >>>>>> plan.
>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>> Above is where I touched a nerve.
>>> I'm sure you'd like to touch me, Paula.
>> Fag.
> I have no doubts that you are, Paula.
He sez hopefully, dreaming of walking down the aisle with his dream
man... but knowing that it's just that, an impossible dream. Chimps
and humans aren't allowed to marry, much to Chimpy's chagrin.
<snicker>
> <Did you like that PEE-WEE. Paula?>
That was no PeeWee, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp. It was an
IKYABWAI. Do try to keep up.
>>> Words on a screen, Paula. They're about as comical as your imaginary >>> perfect life. I spanked socky Nadiggah so hard she's hiding from me now.
>>> She knows what I'm going to keep throwing in her face, and she can't own >>> up to her failures any more than you can. I haven't seen socky Andrew >>> around lately either, and Kensi... well, her heart just doesn't seem to >>> be in this anymore. You've got a little more staying power, but that's >>> just your over-inflated ego telling you that THIS time, you'll be a >>> WINNER, for fuck's sake! It's not going to happen, Paula... just like >>> all the other failures in your pathetic life. The way I see it, you're >>> just a rifle and a bell tower away from making the evening news as it is.
>>> Do me a favor though, Paula... when you go completely berserk, assuming >>> the cops don't cap your sorry ass right on the spot, don't put the blame >>> on me, emkay? We're just having a little fun.
>> Wow, eight words from me, and you spew all the above.
>> I'm winning, for fuck's sake!
> So NOW it's like golf, Paula?
No, it's still like football, but you're running the wrong way on the
field and scoring our touchdowns for us, fat retarded drug-addicted
chimp.
<snicker>
>> Nadegda will post at her usual time, and spank you silly.
>> Andrew Wilson just posted last night.
>> Kensi is on a mini-vacation right now, as she's stated.
> Yes, and ten minutes into it, "she" was back posting more drivel. All > you kOOks are on the same hook, Paula.
Sez the kook flopping on the hook, angry that just as he can't get off
the Xanax, he can't get off the New Cabal hook, either.
>> But do keep reading into things your wishful thinking and desperate
>> hopes, fat retarded drug-addicted chimp, as we spank you to blisters.
>> <snicker>
>>>>> Shuddup, you kOOky grease-monkey/aluminum siding hanger. I have no plans >>>>> to retire any time soon. I like what I'm doing, and my customers like >>>>> what I'm doing.
>>>> Those making less than minimum wage are seldom able to retire.
>>>> <snicker>
>>>> The only customers who like what you're doing are doing you:
>>>> k52oab$ec...@newsfeed.x-privat.org
>>>> <guffaw>
>> No reply, Chimpy?
> Whenever I don't reply... you can assume I don't really give a shit.
No, I'm assuming that you're running scared because you're a coward.
Prove me wrong, coward. In a point by point manner.
<guffaw>
--
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
> > Time to spin up the kooks some more before I go to bed.
> Do I detect the least little bit of sock-confusion here? > I thought that was FNVW 1/4's line.
> Hi-Yo, Gonads! Away!
It ain't easy running that many socks and keeping everything sorted out.
That's why Paul's socks all use the same expressions and "styles"... if you even can call a bunch of rambling, often incoherent vitriol "style".
> > <snicker>
> > Nads doesn't know about the three shells.
> > <snicker>
> > <snicker>
> Is that the game with a pea under one of the shells and > you have to find it? We have a similar game played with > three cards, it's called "Find The Lady".
> Nobody ever can find the Lady, I don't think she really exists.
Oh, you mean Three-Card Monty. The shill always finds the card, but no one else ever does.
> > > Your non sequitur paraphrasing from a Sylvester Stallone movie is noted.
> > > I do suppose I have one thing in common with the original subject of that
> > > line: I'm kicking bad-guy ass and will not be defeated. He, too, was
> > > *winning*, for fuck's sake.
> > I thought you were a female.
> I reckon Nads's nads are detachable, he keeps them > in his purse when they're not required.
