Re: Thank You for Saving Social Security with your Brain Broilers.. Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, Motorola, Apple
JG
> JG <jgrov...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:89e9cf0d-7419-4241-adf2-
> c040f641d...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>
> > The early demise of your big minute yappers will save SS spending over
> > the coming decades and eliminate the needs for tax increases or
> > benefit cuts. Thanks Corporate America !
>
> Dream......and the dreamin's true.....
>
> Dream......it's the thing to do.....
>
> You stupid ass. The tiny power coming out of a sellphone in 2009 can
> heat the leg on a fly. It isn't going to kill or maim anyone.
>
> Go visit your local 25 MEGAwatt UHF TV station at the base of the big
> tower. That'll fry your ass, but their engineers regularly die of old
> age in their 80's and 90's from the sedentary lifestyle of sitting there
> and watching TV, not from Xray or RF non-ionizing radiation.
>
> I'm 63. I was a ham radio operator spraying RF all over the place since
> I was 11. I've worked around high power military transmitters, RADARS,
> TACANs, civilian broadcast transmitters running very high power so your
> cheapass $3 pocket radio can hear the station miles from the
> transmitters all my life.
>
> The 60 Hz radiation from every wire in your little wooden house is FAR
> higher powered than your tiny little sellphone that takes all day for
> its transmitter to run down its tiny little battery pack.
>
> You've been listening to a very well done scare campaign designed to let
> the sellphone companies turn the handset power down and down and down
> over the years so they can put more and more calls on more and more
> towers across the cities...without the scared-to-death sellphone users
> squawking about their range dropping like a rock. It works very well,
> as you are a testimony of!
>
> Hell, the digital transmitters aren't even on the air all the time the
> call is going on. They transmit in little bursts of RF to make the
> batteries go even longer!
>
> Take a transmitter tour of a big gun radio or TV transmitter. The boys
> at the transmitter don't bite, normally, though they act a little
> strange, not having seen anyone since their shift started. They're
> pretty harmless. Ask 'em to see their heads and arms so you can look
> for any cancer tumors and turn the lights off to see if they glow in the
> dark.
Well state troopers, who I trust more than a shill for Alcatel,
Motorola, Nokia, etc.,
would differ:
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/06/03/nyregion/connecticut-is-first-state-to-bar-hand-held-radar-guns.html
"Published: Wednesday, June 3, 1992
Gov. Lowell P. Weicker Jr. signed legislation today making Connecticut
the first state in the nation to ban the use of hand-held radar guns,
which police unions believe can cause cancer after long-term use.
Radar guns, a familiar fixture since the 1950's on rural back roads
and super highway speed traps, will still be allowed if mounted
outside police cars, and Mr. Weicker said other speed-detecting
technologies, using lasers, would also be substituted to enforce speed
limits.
The ban, which takes effect on July 1, passed the House and Senate
unanimously, under heavy lobbying pressure by police unions, which led
what became something of a crusade against the guns after several
officers with years of traffic enforcement were diagnosed with cancer.
The state police stopped using the devices last year, and some
municipal police departments in Connecticut and Florida have also
halted their use. The Seattle Mariners baseball team no longer uses
radar to track the speed of pitchers' fast balls."
nospam
<90eb2799-e420-412e...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, JG
<jgro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Gov. Lowell P. Weicker Jr. signed legislation today making Connecticut
> the first state in the nation to ban the use of hand-held radar guns,
> which police unions believe can cause cancer after long-term use.
connecticut police used to keep the radar gun in their lap while
powered on, lifting it to the window to zap cars. *that* is why they
fried their balls.
normal use of handheld radar is fairly safe, assuming you point it at
traffic and not yourself.
Steve Sobol
ba04db...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, jgro...@hotmail.com says...
> Well state troopers, who I trust more than a shill for Alcatel,
Really.
Seriously.
Larry is a shill for Alcatel?
Or one of the phone manufacturers?
If you honestly think that, you're more of an idiot than I originally
thought.
Guys, all I have to say is: a while ago, when JGrove was posting crap
about Alcatel and Motorola --- stuff that was not off-topic but was
posted over and over and over and OVER AND OVER again -- I said
something to him along the lines of "okay, shut up already" and got a
nasty, nasty response. I can go find it on Google Groups if you like.
JG makes Larry look normal. I mean, seriously. Those of us who have read
Larry's posts know damned well that he is the exact OPPOSITE of a
telecomm industry shill.
Oh, and Grover, this time your crap wasn't even on-topic. It was simply
annoying, and you're a nutjob (you just proved it... thanks)
--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
sjs...@JustThe.net
JG
> In article <90eb2799-e420-412e-ac71-
> ba04db64e...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, jgrov...@hotmail.com says...
>
> > Well state troopers, who I trust more than a shill for Alcatel,
>
> Really.
>
> Seriously.
>
> Larry is a shill for Alcatel?
>
> Or one of the phone manufacturers?
Who do I trust more ? Shills or state troopers, I pick the troopers..JG
Steve Sobol
52c150...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>, jgro...@hotmail.com says...
> Who do I trust more ? Shills or state troopers, I pick the troopers..JG
If you actually read the newsgroups you post to (other than
misc.transport.road, I've seen you actually engage in conversations
there), you'd have read Larry's posts before, and you'd understand that
he isn't a shill.
He doesn't hide. He's used the same alias ever since the first post I
saw from him, years ago.
Larry <no...@home.com>
So, go hit Google Groups and educate yourself about his posting history.
JG
> In article
> <90eb2799-e420-412e-ac71-ba04db64e...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, JG
>
> <jgrov...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Gov. Lowell P. Weicker Jr. signed legislation today making Connecticut
> > the first state in the nation to ban the use of hand-held radar guns,
> > which police unions believe can cause cancer after long-term use.
>
> connecticut police used to keep the radar gun in their lap while
> powered on, lifting it to the window to zap cars. *that* is why they
> fried their balls.
>
> normal use of handheld radar is fairly safe, assuming you point it at
> traffic and not yourself.
So sticking a cell antenna next to your ear has no effect.. I think I
made my point.
And this is Good News, say 30 million big yappers don't make it to age
65 to collect Social Security, thats $3 TRILLION saved.
Steve Sobol
f52180...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, jgro...@hotmail.com says...
> So sticking a cell antenna next to your ear has no effect
I started using cell phones in 1993. 16 years ago, and these were the
old analog phones, not the digital phones that they started selling
around 1995-96. No cancer, no tumors. Thanks for your concern.
> And this is Good News, say 30 million big yappers don't make it to age
> 65 to collect Social Security, thats $3 TRILLION saved.
I know you're a troll, but do you also have to be an asshole?
JG
> In article <4a0dd261-f77f-499a-a4e2-
> f52180af5...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, jgrov...@hotmail.com says...
>
> > So sticking a cell antenna next to your ear has no effect
>
> I started using cell phones in 1993. 16 years ago, and these were the
Report back in 2023.
> old analog phones, not the digital phones that they started selling
> around 1995-96. No cancer, no tumors. Thanks for your concern.
Exhibits 1 & 2: Gene Siskel & Ted Kennedy.
> > And this is Good News, say 30 million big yappers don't make it to age
> > 65 to collect Social Security, thats $3 TRILLION saved.
> Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
I see your Victorville made COPS TV this year, what a slice of heaven.
nospam
<778f2b99-da2e-4701...@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, JG
<jgro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > old analog phones, not the digital phones that they started selling
> > around 1995-96. No cancer, no tumors. Thanks for your concern.
>
> Exhibits 1 & 2: Gene Siskel & Ted Kennedy.
where's the proof it was solely due to cellphones and not something
else? cancer and tumors have been around since long before cellphones
existed.
Larry
f52180...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
> So sticking a cell antenna next to your ear has no effect.. I think I
>
It's hard to FIND the antenna, now! They got rid of them to make sure you
didn't get out too far!
--
Larry
Larry
nos...@nospam.invalid:
> cancer and tumors have been around since long before cellphones
> existed.
>
>
....but not as long as global warming....(c;]
Another stupid modern religion caused by the media.....
--
Larry
Steve Sobol
@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, jgro...@hotmail.com says...
> Exhibits 1 & 2: Gene Siskel & Ted Kennedy.
It's already been said, but I'll say it again because it bears
repeating: Prove that their deaths were the result of cell phone use.
> I see your Victorville made COPS TV this year, what a slice of heaven.
Yeah, must suck to live here, eh?
So, once again, when you can't actually argue the points I'm making, you
attack me instead.
*pat on the head*
Go run along and play now, and leave the adults alone.
--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
sjs...@JustThe.net
JG
> In article <778f2b99-da2e-4701-aed6-0668ce092315
>
> > Exhibits 1 & 2: Gene Siskel & Ted Kennedy.
>
> It's already been said, but I'll say it again because it bears
> repeating: Prove that their deaths were the result of cell phone use.
>
> > I see your Victorville made COPS TV this year, what a slice of heaven.
>
> Yeah, must suck to live here, eh?
>
> So, once again, when you can't actually argue the points I'm making, you
> attack me instead.
I'm a student of the SoCal culture, what can I say. Actually SBSO
impresses me, but at least Rancho Cucamonga pays for 2 man patrol
cars. Did local news cover the arrival of the COPS camera crews ??
Steve Sobol
@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, jgro...@hotmail.com says...
> I'm a student of the SoCal culture, what can I say. Actually SBSO
> impresses me, but at least Rancho Cucamonga pays for 2 man patrol
> cars. Did local news cover the arrival of the COPS camera crews ??
So, you STILL don't have anything intelligent to say about the subject
that was being discussed.
And you have big ol' brass cojones talking about SoCal culture. In
Chicago, aren't all of the criminals working at City Hall?
(See? I can play that game too. When you feel like actually responding
to what I said about your posting habits, please do so.)
JG
> JItG <jgrov...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:4a0dd261-f77f-499a-a4e2-
> f52180af5...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>
> > So sticking a cell antenna next to your ear has no effect.. I think I
>
> It's hard to FIND the antenna, now! They got rid of them to make sure you
> didn't get out too far!
>
> --
> Larry
Its still within millimeters of people's skull. The whole radar gun
saga is just the opening act. They had the right ideal at first with
car phone antennas outside on car roofs.
Even people with the Mr. Spock bluetooth earphones with phones hanging
on their belts will get fried kidneys, with a nice cianti.