Re: Which is more "normal" and "natural"?
ªºªandcarole®
>
> Methinks only men uncomfortable with their own sexuality mind homosexual
> men all that much; otherwise they'd likely have *my* attitude: Yahoo!
> More women for me! � ;-}
You mean more preteen girls for you to rape, don't you pedo frank?
ThePsyko
heard Brandon D Cartwright cry out in
news:90qvn3pfqs0tfsamj...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:22:53 +1030, David <faro...@picknowl.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:52:49 -0800, Brandon D Cartwright
>><us...@example.net> typed furiously:
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:33:34 +1030, David <faro...@picknowl.com.au>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:45:16 -0800, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>><us...@example.net> typed furiously:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:58:25 +1030, David
>>>>><faro...@picknowl.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:12:00 -0800, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>><us...@example.net> typed furiously:
>>>>>>
>>>>[...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The only people I accuse of lying are those who lie. You are a
>>>>>>liar.
>>>>>
>>>>>As I never tire of repeating,your words speak for themselves.
>>>>>
>>>>>You may think yourself clever and erudite but your desires differ
>>>>>in no way from any other pervert and sex predator..
>>>>>
>>>>>From: David <faro...@picknowl.com.au>
>>>>>
>>>>>Message-ID: <m3gtn31eqvf9dv9cb...@4ax.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>" I want to free children from the tyranny
>>>>>of externally imposed celibacy. "
>>>>
>>>>Funny that that message ID does not appear on google. It does sound
>>>>like something I would have said though.
>>>
>>>Give it a chance.. you had only just posted it..
>>>>
>>>>Just for your information you should note that the sentence mentions
>>>>children, not adults.
>>>
>>>You are referring to children being " free" to have sex with adult
>>>pedophiles. They should have sex with anyone the want to have sex
>>>with ..remember?
>>
>>That is true. It is the children that should be free, not the adults.
>>Any suspicion of force or coercion, by anyone, should be dealt with as
>>rape or assault.
>
>>Once again the master of deception and lies proves his ability do
>>distort and misread what is being said.
>
> Nothing distorted or misread..
>
> You advocate children being "free" for adult pedophiles to have sex
> with as long as they consent.
>
> Grooming children to "consent" to sex with them is the stock in trade
> of pedophiles..
he doesn't get it... he can't (won't?) allow himself to see how that
could happen because that would mean his ideas won't work and he's out
of luck
--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
**Pissing off the planet, one person at a time**
Frank McCoy
>Of course the current situation is not exactly working to the
>betterment of children is it?
Whichever side you take, and whoever you blame, that really *sucks*,
doesn't it? ;-{
Of course, like terrorism where the Democrats usually blame the
Republicans, and the Republicans blame the Democrats for what they did
or did not do, neither side really blames the TRUE criminals; because
(like here) they're too interested in smearing those they personally
dislike. ;-{
Oh yeah ... And because sometimes they actually *do* believe that the
other side's activities (or lack thereof) actually led to whatever
current terrorist attack is the talk at the time.
Me?
I blame the perps FIRST; whether sadistic bastards or supposedly
well-meaning Social Workers who care more about their "score" than
actually protecting children.
SECOND I blame a society that doesn't believe in educating children
about the *real* life out there; and instead pushes religious bullshit.
("Just say no," being one of the more egregious examples of same.)
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
Sean Cleary
> ,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
> (_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
If this really is frank, please do not feed the trolls.
But if you follow them back, you can post accurate information on
their trollish behavior to groups that they would not like to have
that reputation.
Sean
R. Steve Walz
>
> On 05 Jan 2008 I stormed the castle called alt.support.boy-lovers and
> heard Brandon D Cartwright cry out in
> news:90qvn3pfqs0tfsamj...@4ax.com...
>
> > of pedophiles..
>
> he doesn't get it... he can't (won't?) allow himself to see how that
> could happen because that would mean his ideas won't work and he's out
> of luck
----------------------
So, to YOU, being nice to someone you want to have sex with is
magically somehow "unfair" if they are young and you're older??
That makes you an antisexual sicko!
That's like saying someone you're asking to let you do a favor for
them is "being groomed" by you!
Grooming is only evil if someone is trying to talk you into doing
something that HURTS or makes you uncomfortable!! NOT something
you would WANT to do if you knew what it felt like! Grooming is
ONLY to talk you into doing something you DON'T WANT TO DO!!
If it is something you DO want to do, then it ISN'T GROOMING!!
The notion of applying "grooming" notions to consensual pleasure
is nothing but antisexual pathology!! Everything good and decent
and kind becomes sickness to your cynical "grooming" mentality,
whether it is adults who want to have sex (are they grooming each
other??) or whether kids experimenting, (what do they want out of
it, to feel GOOD or something??) it all becomes suspect instead
of innocent and pleasurable. You pieces of antisexual shit are the
biggest cynics in the world, unable to accept even gifts for fear
that someone is wanting to GROOM you to have sex with them and give
you PLEASURE!! ICK, HOW NASTY THAT MUST BE!! TO HAVE PLEASURE!!
Do you SEE NOW??? You're mentally ILL!! Get HELP!!
Steve
saavik
>
>
> Adult fucking child = pedophile
>
> It's really not difficult.
>
And it's really not Frank McCoy, nor alt.callahans either.
saavik
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:28:59 -0500, saavik <saa...@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Brandon D Cartwright wrote:
>>
>>> Adult fucking child = pedophile
>>>
>>> It's really not difficult.
>>>
>>>
>> And it's really not Frank McCoy,
>>
>
>
> he is an alleged pedophile but a self-confessed child pornographer.
>
> THAT is a fact not a speculation.
>
>
>> nor alt.callahans either.
>>
>
> alt.callahans seems a veritable cess pit filled with more pedophile
> enablers than you can shake a stick at.
> --
>
Go shake your stick somewhere else, ya' pervert.
Denny Wheeler
wrote:
(one of the several braindead idjits)
>> alt.callahans seems a veritable cess pit filled with more pedophile
>> enablers than you can shake a stick at.
>>
>Go shake your stick somewhere else, ya' pervert.
Notice how this is a cess pit but the idjits are coming here.
Ya think maybe there's some serious hypocrisy going on?
--
-denny-
curmudgeon & editor
"To be a book-collector is to combine the worst characteristics
of a dope fiend with those of a miser."
- Robertson Davies
Wes Struebing
<den...@TANSTAAFL.zipcon.net.INVALID> wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:27:40 -0500, saavik <saa...@sympatico.ca>
>wrote:
>
>(one of the several braindead idjits)
>>> alt.callahans seems a veritable cess pit filled with more pedophile
>>> enablers than you can shake a stick at.
>>>
>>Go shake your stick somewhere else, ya' pervert.
>
>Notice how this is a cess pit but the idjits are coming here.
>Ya think maybe there's some serious hypocrisy going on?
But, Denny, you're not supposed to notice the cretin behind the
curtain...
--
Wes Struebing
Jan. 20, 2009 - the end of an error
saavik
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:27:40 -0500, saavik <saa...@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> (one of the several braindead idjits)
>
>>> alt.callahans seems a veritable cess pit filled with more pedophile
>>> enablers than you can shake a stick at.
>>>
>>>
>> Go shake your stick somewhere else, ya' pervert.
>>
>
> Notice how this is a cess pit but the idjits are coming here.
> Ya think maybe there's some serious hypocrisy going on?
>
>
Denny Wheeler
If the cretin would quit using a transparent curtain...
I suspect he/they would be more comfortable with one made of iron.
R. Steve Walz
Gee, since he is both married and not a rapist, both by his own
declaration and by a lack of convictions or even prosecutions,
that means you're wrong and an asshole.
Steve
R. Steve Walz
>
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:48:30 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
> <rst...@armory.com> wrote:
>
> >Brandon D Cartwright wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:22:53 +1030, David <faro...@picknowl.com.au>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>You are referring to children being " free" to have sex with adult
> >> >>..remember?
> >> >
> >> >That is true. It is the children that should be free, not the adults.
> >> >Any suspicion of force or coercion, by anyone, should be dealt with as
> >> >rape or assault.
> >>
> >> >Once again the master of deception and lies proves his ability do
> >> >distort and misread what is being said.
> >>
> >> with as long as they consent.
> >>
> >> of pedophiles..
> >Why would children want to fuck dirty filthy nasty OLD pedophiles when
> >they can fuck their father or brother or the nice man down the street??
> >
> >Oh, that's right, any person a child wants to fuck is auto-magically
> >a "pedophile" to you, aren't they??
> >
> >You're a fuckin' idiot.
>
> Adult fucking child = pedophile
>
> It's really not difficult.
And simplicity is simple for simpletons like you.
Steve
R. Steve Walz
-----------------------
Can't occur in a society where sex for kids who want it is open,
protected, supported, and not humilating, shamed or concealed.
Steve
R. Steve Walz
>
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:44:27 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
> <rst...@armory.com> wrote:
>
> >Brandon D Cartwright wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:33:34 +1030, David <faro...@picknowl.com.au>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> You are referring to children being " free" to have sex with adult
> >> pedophiles. They should have sex with anyone the want to have sex with
> >> ..remember?
> >Sure, but what makes you think they will want to have sex with old
> >dirty scumbag pedophiles, when they can fuck their father or brother
> >or the nice man down the street??
>
>
> If a father fucks his own children he IS an incestuous pedophile
-------------------------
Nonsense, a pedophile is sickly attracted ONLY to totally prepubescent
children, and fixatedly so. A parent would only be having sex with his
child if the child requested it!
> >Oh, that's right, any person a child wants to fuck is a pedophile to
> >you, aren't they??
>
> If they fuck the child ..of course they are
>
> Adult fucking child = pedophile
-----------------------------
You're just an ignorant simpleton.
You don't even think, you just react.
Steve