Message from discussion
["SCOTUS invalidated the whole ObamaCare law by declaring it a tax which did not originate in the House. "]
Received: by 10.66.73.226 with SMTP id o2mr1014782pav.12.1352913551372;
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Path: s9ni10216pbb.0!nntp.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:19:10 -0600
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:19:10 -0600
From: deadrat <a...@b.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: misc.legal,alt.california,alt.politics.economics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: ["SCOTUS invalidated the whole ObamaCare law by declaring it
a tax which did not originate in the House. "]
References: <oe40a8dlucm5698vg0t0si0215re5nsqnr@4ax.com> <1fKdndotY96bhj3NnZ2dnUVZ5uudnZ2d@giganews.com> <hgn1a8lmng57rokqa2vfikje5cl03ve27r@4ax.com> <SJudnS6sesM-wTzNnZ2dnUVZ5j8AAAAA@giganews.com> <pdl4a8l6odoo2p2dvqmblf3uhqpj53d87e@4ax.com> <noadnVQnhdYUGT_NnZ2dnUVZ5qcAAAAA@giganews.com> <kqa5a8d91q5lsvgt55mdeaarqq1t4e86an@4ax.com> <waydneIvgso-nj7NnZ2dnUVZ5sydnZ2d@giganews.com> <rr37a8dkgi2jljb6b9jse956eo2oeafvva@4ax.com> <bbGdnU8aRpSGWD7NnZ2dnUVZ5jAAAAAA@giganews.com> <cdh7a8tb85oko0vot35vopka1i0631nsvs@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <cdh7a8tb85oko0vot35vopka1i0631nsvs@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <r4idna-7cPQTTz7NnZ2dnUVZ5ugAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 27
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-bRMSFLtvEbjQRzxAak+pL7kAn7mp5DGKhOwYDReDoW2/eZlmJVilichCEXXz1OARV1dK7/PyEcUaBU8!4xp4afeef+aVbHQkIRcp+ja0zZqFMTpL1zKa+AsiOYe63l6IOyILN73x53eUf1/Lw6kcgbev
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2581
X-Original-Bytes: 2520
X-Received-Bytes: 2661
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 11/14/12 10:24 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>> On 11/14/12 6:33 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>> deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>
>>>> On 11/13/12 2:20 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Then pretend you actually have a valid point and attempt to explain it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> Or not.
>>>
>>> There's no point.
>>
>> Really? Even I think you have a point.
> You haven't shown much evidence of thinking.
And that's the best you've got, isn't it? What's next? Calling me a
poopyhead?
I haven't shown much evidence of thinking like you. But that's different.