Message from discussion ["SCOTUS invalidated the whole ObamaCare law by declaring it a tax which did not originate in the House. "]
Received: by 10.66.73.226 with SMTP id o2mr1014782pav.12.1352913551372;
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:19:11 -0800 (PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:19:10 -0600
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:19:10 -0600
From: deadrat <a...@b.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
Subject: Re: ["SCOTUS invalidated the whole ObamaCare law by declaring it
a tax which did not originate in the House. "]
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <1fKdndotY96bhj3NnZ2dnUVZ5uudnZ2d@giganews.com> <email@example.com> <SJudnS6sesM-wTzNnZ2dnUVZ5j8AAAAA@giganews.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <noadnVQnhdYUGT_NnZ2dnUVZ5qcAAAAA@giganews.com> <email@example.com> <waydneIvgso-nj7NnZ2dnUVZ5sydnZ2d@giganews.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <bbGdnU8aRpSGWD7NnZ2dnUVZ5jAAAAAA@giganews.com> <email@example.com>
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/14/12 10:24 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>> On 11/14/12 6:33 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>> deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>> On 11/13/12 2:20 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>>> Then pretend you actually have a valid point and attempt to explain it.
>>>> Or not.
>>> There's no point.
>> Really? Even I think you have a point.
> You haven't shown much evidence of thinking.
And that's the best you've got, isn't it? What's next? Calling me a
I haven't shown much evidence of thinking like you. But that's different.