Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Liberal Racism

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 12:52:20 AM1/10/07
to
Liberal Racism

http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue

Liberals, who have always claimed to be the
authoritative source of progressive attitudes on race,
have actually become one of the centers of racist
thinking in America over the last quarter century, a
period of time in which postwar liberalism itself was
being reconfigured by the radical Sixties worldview.
Liberal racism began in the last years of Martin Luther
King, Jr.'s life, when organizations such as the Black
Panther Party and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating
Committee (SNCC) radicalized the issue of color in
America by focusing on legitimate "black rage" and the
"institutional racism" they claimed was embedded in the
"DNA" of American society. King was an obstacle in
their path; they rejected the gains he had achieved as
illusory. This was no mere intellectual disagreement
about a strategy for improving race relations in
America; it had a bitter personal component. The black
radicals and their white supporters derided King as "De
Lawd" and "Uncle Martin."

Later on, after King's assassination, most of those who
had expressed contempt for him during his lifetime
would pay cynical homage to his martyrdom. But they
never embraced his vision of an integrated social
world. Rather, the program of these liberal racists,
both white and black, focused on separatism and racial
difference. Instead of subscribing to King's belief in
a colorblind society, they wanted government policies
that were color-coded. The further America progressed
from the dark days of slavery, the more they insisted
that slavery was present in America's social
institutions and its personal interrelationships. The
U.S., they asserted, was steeped in blood and guilt: it
must pay for its crimes against "people of color."

The extent to which such views have not only entered
but dominated the intellectual mainstream of America in
the past three decades can be seen in the degree to
which King's notion that people should be judged by the
content of their character rather than the color of
their skin has become marginalized as quaint and naive.
The racism in the left's view primarily of blacks
themselves, but also of whites, has been clear in the
policies the left has pursued. Some, like the demand
for reparations for slavery, have not yet prevailed.
Others, like the demand for affirmative action, have
become part of America's way of doing business as a
society. Although claiming to be an equitable "leveling
of the playing field," this policy has actually tilted
the social landscape. It has nothing to do with
equality of opportunity, and everything to do with
establishing a regime that will produce an equality of
results. It is a zero sum game in which some win
because of skin color and others lose because of skin
color. Ultimately, affirmative action has put
government back into the business of playing racial
favorites — even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
banned such action.

Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.

Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
destroy the black family and create a black underclass
by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
culture rather than race may help explain the
disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
America's black children are born poor, and that this
fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
that 85 percent of these poor children come from
single-parent homes. It is this circumstance—studies
show that children born into single-parent families are
more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than
children with two parents—rather than "institutional
racism" that actually handicaps them. Yet in the
liberal view, any policy aimed at countering
illegitimacy and single parenthood among the black
underclass is "blaming the victim."

The effects of liberal racism can be seen in the way
black students taunt those among them who strive for
achievement as sellouts who are "acting white." Liberal
racism can be seen in the unholy alliance between the
Democrat Party, the National Education Association and
other teachers' unions, and black spokesmen such as
Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, to maintain their power
by opposing school choice for black children trapped in
violent and failing public schools. Liberal racism can
be seen in the way black voters are kept on the
proverbial "liberal plantation" through scare tactics
and attacks on "race traitors" such as Colin Powell and
Condoleeza Rice, who have defied the party line.
Liberal racism can be seen, paradoxically, most clearly
in the way anyone straying from its premises is
immediately branded as a "racist." This is a powerful
sanction that liberal racists use like a bludgeon to
control the public discussion about race.

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 1:30:25 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>My Racism
>

Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!


'The Race Myth: Why We Pretend Race Exists in America'


http://www.amazon.com/Race-Myth-Pretend-Exists-America/dp/0452286581

quote

Book Description

Does race as we know it really exist?

Preeminent evolutionary biologist Joseph Graves proves once and for all that
it doesn't. Through accessible and compelling language, he makes the
provocative argument that science cannot account for the radical categories
used to classify people, and debunks ancient race-related fallacies that are
still held as fact, from damaging medical profiles to misconceptions about
sports. He explains why defining race according to skin tone or eye shape is
woefully inaccurate, and how making assumptions based on these false
categories regarding IQ, behavior, or predisposition to disease has
devastating effects.

Demonstrating that racial distinctions are in fact social inventions, not
biological truths, The Race Myth brings much-needed, sound science to one of
America's most emotionally charged debates.


About the Author

Joseph L. Graves Jr. is one of the world's leading evolutionary biologists.
He is currently University Core Director and Professor of Biological
Sciences at Fairleigh Dickinson University. He has appeared in six
documentaries about race and his opinions have appeared in The New York
Times and the Los Angeles Times. He is also the author of The Emperor's New
Clothes.

From Booklist

Graves, an evolutionary biologist and professor, debunks numerous myths
associated with the biological basis of race. His central premise is that
there is greater variation within socially constructed races than between
them, yet biological differences are often presumed to be an acceptable
focus in areas of medicine, disease, and other public-oriented concerns.
Graves attacks head-on the false assumptions associated with biological
distinctions. Although he allows for certain genetic and biological points
of differences, he asserts that their interplay with the environment and
culture are too often overlooked and that, for example, differences in
health and mortality rates between blacks and whites are more reflective of
racism than biology. Noting the popular presumptions about blacks being
biologically superior athletes, for example, Graves' analysis of
track-and-field Olympic events undermines the weak basis of this and other
popular fallacies on race. Graves' integration of science and objective
analysis with popular biological assumptions about race makes this an
enlightening and provocative work. Vernon Ford

Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text
refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

end quote


http://www.amazon.com/Race-Myth-Pretend-Exists-America/dp/0452286581

The mythology of race has been used for centuries by conservative types to
justify the exploitation and abuse of non-whites throughout the world. This
book undercuts the conservatives right where it hurts them most: on the
battlefield of ideas!

And, as an added bonus:

The Love Life of Rudy Canudity:

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=43447455


Fooled By Folksy Republicans


Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 1:36:08 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> My Racism
>>
>
> Debunking

Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream

http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016

"This is a tough-minded, provocative indictment of the
failure of liberalism in the post-Civil Rights era. As
Sleeper sees it, liberals once held the moral high
ground because they "fought nobly to help this country
rise above color." Now, however, liberals have become
blinded by race and have abandoned the fight to create
what Sleeper calls the "transracial belonging and civic
faith for which Americans of all colors so obviously
yearn." Much of what Sleeper has to say here flies in
the face of politically correct received wisdom about
race, but as an effort to remind Americans that all of
us are fundamentally responsible for our fates, this is
a much-needed corrective to race-based thinking that
has proven unproductive."

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 1:41:53 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> My Racism
>>>
>>
>> Debunking
>
> Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the American Dream
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-

KKK-ganda, from a KKK-gandist and an Argentine Peronista Ca-nudist.


http://www.amazon.com/Race-Myth-Pretend-Exists-America/dp/0452286581

quote

Book Description


About the Author

From Booklist

end quote


http://www.amazon.com/Race-Myth-Pretend-Exists-America/dp/0452286581

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=43447455


Fooled By Folksy Republicans

>
> "drivel snipped


Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 1:50:03 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> My Racism
>>>>
>>> Debunking

Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream

http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 1:53:02 AM1/10/07
to
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> My Racism
>>>
>>
>> Debunking
>
> Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the American Dream
>

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 1:55:09 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> My Racism
>>>>
>>> Debunking
>> Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the American Dream
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-
>
> KKK-ganda, from a KKK-gandist and an Argentine Peronista Ca-nudist.
>
> Debunking

Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream

http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 1:56:43 AM1/10/07
to
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> My Racism
>>>
>>
>> Debunking
>
> Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the American Dream
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-

KKK-ganda, from a KKK-gandist and an Argentine Peronista Ca-nudist.

Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 1:57:37 AM1/10/07
to
stupid fuckwit lied:
> > "Rudy Canoza" <notgen...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
> >
news:1168314039....@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...

>> > > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> > >> "Rudy Canoza" <notgen...@yahoo.com> wrote
in message
>>> > >>
news:1168302585.5...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

>>>> > >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>>>> > >> >> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@yahoo.com>
wrote in message
>>>>> > >> >>
news:1168298228.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

>>>>>> > >> >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>>>>>> > >> >> >> Racists often make pseudoscientific
claims in these newsgroups that
>>>>>>> > >> >> >> blacks
>>>>>>> > >> >> >> are unaccomplished in matters of
higher learning...let's debunk
>>>>>>> > >> >> >> that
>>>>>>> > >> >> >> bigoted
>>>>>> > >> >> >
>>>>>> > >> >> > [snip remainder of straw man bullshit]
>>>>>> > >> >> >
>>>>>> > >> >> > A smaller percentage of blacks
graduate from four-year universities
>>>>>> > >> >> > than do whites:
>>>>>> > >> >> >
http://www.bsos.umd.edu/socy/vanneman/socy441/trends/collrace.html
>>>>> > >> >>
>>>>> > >> >> Why would blacks want to go to school
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > So, you're claiming blacks don't go to
university because they don't
>>>> > >> > want to go? Why do you think you know this?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Isn't it obvious? I wouldn't want to go to a
school
>> > >
>> > > And so you didn't, just to spite them.
> >
> > So you've

...shoved your face in the shit again. Yes, stupid
marginal, I have
shoved your face in the shit again.


>>>>>> > >> >> > Spout whatever ideological bullshit
you wish about the reasons, but
>>>>>> > >> >> > the
>>>>>> > >> >> > graduation rates are indisputable.
>>>>>> > >> >> >
>>>>> > >> >>
>>>>> > >> >> If you had any brains at all, Canoza,
you'd know that it is harder
>>>>> > >> >> for blacks to afford college in the
first place
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > Bullshit.

BULLSHIT, stupid angry lefty.


>>>> > >> > Anyway, you seem to have ignored what I
said above:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Any sensible person would ignore an idiot
like Canooza.
>> > >
>> > > That leaves you out.
>> > >
> >
> > [Canoza ignored.]

No, you're not ignoring me. You can't. I'm tearing
your dogma to
ribbons.


>>>> > >> > you can posit any
>>>> > >> > pseudo-intellectual bullshit you want
about why they don't go and
>>>> > >> > graduate, but the fact is, not as many
blacks *do* attend university
>>>> > >> > and graduate as do whites.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> So what? I just proved it meaningless.
>> > >
>> > > No, you didn't. You didn't prove a thing
except what a jackball you
>> > > are.
> >
> > Did too,

You didn't prove a thing except what a jackball you are.


>>>> > >> >SO, Mr. Fuckwit, pointing out that blacks
>>>> > >> > are "unaccomplished" in "matters of higher
learning" [jesus, but you
>>>> > >> > write weird] is a factual statement.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> So what? I just proved it meaningless.
>> > >
>> > > You didn't; see above.
> >
> > Did too

Nope. You didn't prove a thing except what a jackball
you are.


>>>> > >> > It's funny you'd be dwelling on this fact,
though, because the link I
>>>> > >> > supplied you indicates that even fewer
Hispanics graduate from
>>>> > >> > university as a percentage of all
Hispanics. That same link also has
>>>> > >> > links to other interesting
race-and-ethnicity-based data, such as high
>>>> > >> > school drop-out percentages by race or
ethnicity. Hispanics also drop
>>>> > >> > out of high school at much higher rates
than blacks.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> So you're a drop-out
>> > >
>> > > Nope. Ph.D. in economics; UCLA.
> >
> > UCLA doesn't give out Ph.Ds

Right - I earned it, jackball.


> > "Rudy Canoza" <notgen...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
> >
news:1168302585.5...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...


>> > > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

>>> > >> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
>>> > >>
news:1168298228.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...


>>>> > >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

>>>>> > >> >> Racists often make pseudoscientific
claims in these newsgroups that
>>>>> > >> >> blacks
>>>>> > >> >> are unaccomplished in matters of higher
learning...let's debunk that
>>>>> > >> >> bigoted
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > [snip remainder of straw man bullshit]
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > A smaller percentage of blacks graduate
from four-year universities
>>>> > >> > than do whites:
>>>> > >> >
http://www.bsos.umd.edu/socy/vanneman/socy441/trends/collrace.html
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Why would blacks want to go to school
>> > >
>> > > So, you're claiming blacks don't go to
university because they don't
>> > > want to go? Why do you think you know this?
> >
> > Isn't it obvious? I wouldn't want to go to school

And so you didn't, just to spite someone.


>>>> > >> > Spout whatever ideological bullshit you
wish about the reasons, but the
>>>> > >> > graduation rates are indisputable.
>>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >> If you had any brains at all, Canooza, you'd
know that it is harder for
>>> > >> blacks to afford college in the first place
>> > >
>> > > Bullshit.
>> > >
>> > > Anyway, you seem to have ignored what I said above:
> >
> > Any sensible person

That leaves you out.


>> > > you can posit any
>> > > pseudo-intellectual bullshit you want about why
they don't go and
>> > > graduate, but the fact is, not as many blacks
*do* attend university
>> > > and graduate as do whites.
> >
> > So what? I just proved it meaningless.

You didn't prove a thing except what a jackball you are.


>> > >SO, Mr. Fuckwit, pointing out that blacks
>> > > are "unaccomplished" in "matters of higher
learning" [jesus, but you
>> > > write weird] is a factual statement.
> >
> > So what? I just proved it meaningless.

You didn't prove a thing except what a jackball you are.


>> > > It's funny you'd be dwelling on this fact,
though, because the link I
>> > > supplied you indicates that even fewer
Hispanics graduate from
>> > > university as a percentage of all Hispanics.
That same link also has
>> > > links to other interesting
race-and-ethnicity-based data, such as high
>> > > school drop-out percentages by race or
ethnicity. Hispanics also drop
>> > > out of high school at much higher rates than
blacks.
> >
> > So you're

...shoving your face in the shit again. Yes, I am
doing that.


>> > > So, Fuckwit, why do you dwell on what people
might say about blacks,
>> > > when clearly Hispanics have even bigger
problems in education. Why,
>> > > it's because you're a racist motherfucking
shitbag bigot, isn't it?
>> > > Someone who *needs* blacks to be in a a
position of dependency on you
>> > > and your, uh, "enlightenment".
> >
> > Again, with the filthy language thing!

You'll take it and you'll like it, impotent punk.


>> > > You filthy shitbag.
> >
> > Am!

Right.

>>>> > >> > You stupid twat.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> From the looks of your Myspace profile
>> > >
>> > > I don't have a myspace profile.
> >
> > Liar,

No myspace profile, jackball.

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:00:02 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:01:16 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> My Racism
>>>>
>>> Debunking

Liberal Racism

http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue

jaona...@nowhere.com

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:01:57 AM1/10/07
to
LMWAO

Graves has not one peer reviewed article

quote from my college library

"search returned 0 articles"

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:04:36 AM1/10/07
to

<jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:45a48f3a$0$9723$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com...

> LMWAO
>
> Graves has not one peer reviewed article

So? Judge the book on it's merits...

For example, I judge that your views have no merit. See how easy it is!

>
> quote from my college library

You're in college? Basketweaving U?

FBFR

>
> "search returned 0 articles"


Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:05:50 AM1/10/07
to
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> My Racism
>>>
>>
>> Debunking
>

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:07:23 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> <jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:45a48f3a$0$9723$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>> LMWAO
>>
>> Graves has not one peer reviewed article
>
> So?

So, he's a fraud, and you're a predictably stupid
shitworm for citing him.

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:08:52 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> My Racism
>>>>
>>> Debunking

Liberal Racism

http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:10:05 AM1/10/07
to
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:11:30 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>My Racism
>

Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:11:41 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> My Racism
>>>>
>>> Debunking

Liberal Racism

http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:12:31 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> My Racism
>>
>
> Debunking

Liberal Racism

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:14:49 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> My Racism
>>>>
>>> Debunking

Liberal Racism

http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:15:10 AM1/10/07
to
stupid fuckwit lied:
> > "Rudy Canoza" <notgen...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
> >
news:1168314039....@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...
>> > > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> > >> "Rudy Canoza" <notgen...@yahoo.com> wrote
in message
>>> > >>
news:1168302585.5...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>>>> > >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>>>> > >> >> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@yahoo.com>
wrote in message
>>>>> > >> >>
news:1168298228.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> > >> >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

BULLSHIT, stupid angry lefty.

>> > > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

>>> > >> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
>>> > >>
news:1168298228.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

>>>> > >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:15:54 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> My Racism
>>>>
>>> Debunking
>> Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the American Dream
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-
>
> KKK-ganda, from a KKK-gandist and an Argentine Peronista Ca-nudist.
>
> Debunking

Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream

http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:17:27 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>My Racism
>

Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:18:38 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>My Racism
>

Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:18:26 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> My Racism
>>>>
>>> Debunking
>> Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the American Dream
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-
>
> KKK-ganda, from a KKK-gandist and an Argentine Peronista Ca-nudist.
>
> Debunking

Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream

http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:19:47 AM1/10/07
to
stupid fuckwit lied:
> > "Rudy Canoza" <notgen...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
> >
news:1168314039....@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...
>> > > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> > >> "Rudy Canoza" <notgen...@yahoo.com> wrote
in message
>>> > >>
news:1168302585.5...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>>>> > >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>>>> > >> >> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@yahoo.com>
wrote in message
>>>>> > >> >>
news:1168298228.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> > >> >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

BULLSHIT, stupid angry lefty.

>> > > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

>>> > >> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
>>> > >>
news:1168298228.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

>>>> > >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:20:42 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> My Racism
>>
>
> Debunking

Liberal Racism

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:21:45 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> FBFR's Racism

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:22:23 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>My Racism
>

Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:24:27 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:24:56 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> FBFR's
Racism
>>
>
> Debunking white liberal racists (easy)

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:26:17 AM1/10/07
to
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> My Racism
>>>
>>
>> Debunking
>

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:26:30 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> My Racism
>>
>
> Debunking white liberal racists (easy)

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:27:12 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:Ou0ph.986$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:27:02 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> My Racism
>>>>
>>> Debunking
>> Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the American Dream

Liberal Racism

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:27:30 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:Ou0ph.986$O34...@newsfe03.lga...
>

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:28:05 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:Lw0ph.988$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:28:23 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:ty0ph.989$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:28:08 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
> message news:Ou0ph.986$O34...@newsfe03.lga...
>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> My Racism
>>>
>> Debunking white liberal racists cocksuckers

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:29:15 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
> message news:Ou0ph.986$O34...@newsfe03.lga...
>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> My Racism
>>>
>> Debunking white liberal racists

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:30:23 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:Cz0ph.991$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:30:40 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:kz0ph.990$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:30:29 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
> message news:Lw0ph.988$O34...@newsfe03.lga...
>>
>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> FBFR's Racism
>>>
>> Debunking white liberal racism

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:31:48 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:8A0ph.992$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:32:22 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:DD0ph.1000$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:32:37 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:rA0ph.993$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:32:52 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:iC0ph.998$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:33:05 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:bq0ph.981$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:32:56 AM1/10/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> "Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
> message news:ty0ph.989$O34...@newsfe03.lga...
>> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:sP%oh.9117$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>>> "Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>>> My Racism
>>>>>
>>>> Debunking
>>> Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the American Dream

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:33:36 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:zC0ph.999$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:34:02 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:dE0ph.1001$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:35:26 AM1/10/07
to

"Fooled By Folksy Republicans" <Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote in
message news:pE0ph.1002$O34...@newsfe03.lga...

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:42:00 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:az0ph.9172$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> of playing racial favorites ó even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the
> summary achievement of the civil rights movement, banned such action.
>
> Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective tests for college
> admissions are actually rigged in favor of whites. When Asians, many of
> them recent immigrants with little or no cultural experience, refute this
> notion by outscoring whites on these tests, liberal racists say that these
> Asians are not really a minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
>
> Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped destroy the black
> family and create a black underclass by their romanticization of ghetto
> behavior, and their insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
> responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that culture rather
> than race may help explain the disadvantages those in the black underclass
> face. It is true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of America's
> black children are born poor, and that this fact affects their life
> chances. But it is also true that 85 percent of these poor children come
> from single-parent homes. It is this circumstanceóstudies show that
> children born into single-parent families are more likely to be poor,
> regardless of race, than children with two parentsórather than

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:42:05 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:fB0ph.9181$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> of playing racial favorites ó even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the
> summary achievement of the civil rights movement, banned such action.
>
> Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective tests for college
> admissions are actually rigged in favor of whites. When Asians, many of
> them recent immigrants with little or no cultural experience, refute this
> notion by outscoring whites on these tests, liberal racists say that these
> Asians are not really a minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
>
> Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped destroy the black
> family and create a black underclass by their romanticization of ghetto
> behavior, and their insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
> responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that culture rather
> than race may help explain the disadvantages those in the black underclass
> face. It is true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of America's
> black children are born poor, and that this fact affects their life
> chances. But it is also true that 85 percent of these poor children come
> from single-parent homes. It is this circumstanceóstudies show that
> children born into single-parent families are more likely to be poor,
> regardless of race, than children with two parentsórather than

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 2:42:28 AM1/10/07
to

"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:Gy0ph.9171$yx6....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> of playing racial favorites ó even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the
> summary achievement of the civil rights movement, banned such action.
>
> Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective tests for college
> admissions are actually rigged in favor of whites. When Asians, many of
> them recent immigrants with little or no cultural experience, refute this
> notion by outscoring whites on these tests, liberal racists say that these
> Asians are not really a minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
>
> Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped destroy the black
> family and create a black underclass by their romanticization of ghetto
> behavior, and their insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
> responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that culture rather
> than race may help explain the disadvantages those in the black underclass
> face. It is true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of America's
> black children are born poor, and that this fact affects their life
> chances. But it is also true that 85 percent of these poor children come
> from single-parent homes. It is this circumstanceóstudies show that
> children born into single-parent families are more likely to be poor,
> regardless of race, than children with two parentsórather than

jaona...@nowhere.com

unread,
Jan 10, 2007, 7:18:11 PM1/10/07
to
I did it is sold in the fiction section of Amazon

just like Tim wise Graves is no one


On 9-Jan-2007, "Fooled By Folksy Republicans"
<Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote:

> So? Judge the book on it's merits...

damn you are dumb
if I have access to college libraries what should that tell you

> You're in college? Basketweaving U?

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Mar 8, 2007, 10:02:46 AM3/8/07
to
Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
> <jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:45a48f3a$0$9723$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>> LMWAO
>>
>> Graves has not one peer reviewed article
>
> So?

So, he's a fraud, and you're a predictably stupid
shitworm for citing him.


Liberal Racism

http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue

favorites — even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,


the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
banned such action.

Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.

Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
destroy the black family and create a black underclass
by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
culture rather than race may help explain the
disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
America's black children are born poor, and that this
fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
that 85 percent of these poor children come from

single-parent homes. It is this circumstance—studies


show that children born into single-parent families are
more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than

children with two parents—rather than "institutional

Karl

unread,
Mar 9, 2007, 12:14:25 PM3/9/07
to

"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:qAVHh.7683$PL....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> favorites ó even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

> the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
> banned such action.
>
> Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
> tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
> favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
> immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
> refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
> liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
> minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
>
> Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
> destroy the black family and create a black underclass
> by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
> insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
> responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
> culture rather than race may help explain the
> disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
> true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
> America's black children are born poor, and that this
> fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
> that 85 percent of these poor children come from
> single-parent homes. It is this circumstanceóstudies

> show that children born into single-parent families are
> more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than
> children with two parentsórather than "institutional

> racism" that actually handicaps them. Yet in the
> liberal view, any policy aimed at countering
> illegitimacy and single parenthood among the black
> underclass is "blaming the victim."
>
> The effects of liberal racism can be seen in the way
> black students taunt those among them who strive for
> achievement as sellouts who are "acting white." Liberal
> racism can be seen in the unholy alliance between the
> Democrat Party, the National Education Association and
> other teachers' unions, and black spokesmen such as
> Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, to maintain their power
> by opposing school choice for black children trapped in
> violent and failing public schools. Liberal racism can
> be seen in the way black voters are kept on the
> proverbial "liberal plantation" through scare tactics
> and attacks on "race traitors" such as Colin Powell and
> Condoleeza Rice, who have defied the party line.
> Liberal racism can be seen, paradoxically, most clearly
> in the way anyone straying from its premises is
> immediately branded as a "racist." This is a powerful
> sanction that liberal racists use like a bludgeon to
> control the public discussion about race.

Yet the LIBERAL racists all moved to the Republican Party when they welcomed
the "DIXIECRATS" with open arms.

Racism is what conservatism is all about! It what makes YOUR form of FACISM
work in the US!


Rudy Canoza

unread,
Mar 9, 2007, 12:24:07 PM3/9/07
to
>> favorites — even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

>> the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
>> banned such action.
>>
>> Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
>> tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
>> favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
>> immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
>> refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
>> liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
>> minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
>>
>> Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
>> destroy the black family and create a black underclass
>> by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
>> insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
>> responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
>> culture rather than race may help explain the
>> disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
>> true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
>> America's black children are born poor, and that this
>> fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
>> that 85 percent of these poor children come from
>> single-parent homes. It is this circumstance—studies

>> show that children born into single-parent families are
>> more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than
>> children with two parents—rather than "institutional

>> racism" that actually handicaps them. Yet in the
>> liberal view, any policy aimed at countering
>> illegitimacy and single parenthood among the black
>> underclass is "blaming the victim."
>>
>> The effects of liberal racism can be seen in the way
>> black students taunt those among them who strive for
>> achievement as sellouts who are "acting white." Liberal
>> racism can be seen in the unholy alliance between the
>> Democrat Party, the National Education Association and
>> other teachers' unions, and black spokesmen such as
>> Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, to maintain their power
>> by opposing school choice for black children trapped in
>> violent and failing public schools. Liberal racism can
>> be seen in the way black voters are kept on the
>> proverbial "liberal plantation" through scare tactics
>> and attacks on "race traitors" such as Colin Powell and
>> Condoleeza Rice, who have defied the party line.
>> Liberal racism can be seen, paradoxically, most clearly
>> in the way anyone straying from its premises is
>> immediately branded as a "racist." This is a powerful
>> sanction that liberal racists use like a bludgeon to
>> control the public discussion about race.
>
> Yet the LIBERAL racists all moved to the Republican Party when they welcomed
> the "DIXIECRATS" with open arms.

No. The Dixiecrats were never liberal in any sense of
the word.


> Racism is what conservatism is all about!

False.

Karl

unread,
Mar 9, 2007, 8:48:10 PM3/9/07
to

"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:XKgIh.125608$_73....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> favorites ó even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

>>> the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
>>> banned such action.
>>>
>>> Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
>>> tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
>>> favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
>>> immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
>>> refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
>>> liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
>>> minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
>>>
>>> Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
>>> destroy the black family and create a black underclass
>>> by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
>>> insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
>>> responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
>>> culture rather than race may help explain the
>>> disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
>>> true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
>>> America's black children are born poor, and that this
>>> fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
>>> that 85 percent of these poor children come from
>>> single-parent homes. It is this circumstanceóstudies

>>> show that children born into single-parent families are
>>> more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than
>>> children with two parentsórather than "institutional

Strom Thurman, ever hear of him? DIXIECRAT then Republican.

>
>> Racism is what conservatism is all about!
>
> False.

Race baiting is your stock and trade.


Rudy Canoza

unread,
Mar 9, 2007, 9:22:42 PM3/9/07
to
>>>> favorites — even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

>>>> the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
>>>> banned such action.
>>>>
>>>> Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
>>>> tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
>>>> favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
>>>> immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
>>>> refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
>>>> liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
>>>> minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
>>>>
>>>> Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
>>>> destroy the black family and create a black underclass
>>>> by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
>>>> insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
>>>> responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
>>>> culture rather than race may help explain the
>>>> disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
>>>> true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
>>>> America's black children are born poor, and that this
>>>> fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
>>>> that 85 percent of these poor children come from
>>>> single-parent homes. It is this circumstance—studies

>>>> show that children born into single-parent families are
>>>> more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than
>>>> children with two parents—rather than "institutional

But never a liberal.

Why did you bring up an example that disproves your
fuckwitted claim?


>>> Racism is what conservatism is all about!
>> False.
>
> Race baiting is your stock and trade.

False.

Miguel O'Pastel

unread,
Mar 12, 2007, 9:21:00 PM3/12/07
to

"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:SDoIh.10960$Jl....@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| >>>> favorites ó even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

| >>>> the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
| >>>> banned such action.
| >>>>
| >>>> Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
| >>>> tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
| >>>> favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
| >>>> immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
| >>>> refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
| >>>> liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
| >>>> minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
| >>>>
| >>>> Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
| >>>> destroy the black family and create a black underclass
| >>>> by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
| >>>> insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
| >>>> responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
| >>>> culture rather than race may help explain the
| >>>> disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
| >>>> true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
| >>>> America's black children are born poor, and that this
| >>>> fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
| >>>> that 85 percent of these poor children come from
| >>>> single-parent homes. It is this circumstanceóstudies

| >>>> show that children born into single-parent families are
| >>>> more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than
| >>>> children with two parentsórather than "institutional
Never heard of Huey Long, huh?
M

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Mar 12, 2007, 10:26:27 PM3/12/07
to
> | >>>> favorites — even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

> | >>>> the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
> | >>>> banned such action.
> | >>>>
> | >>>> Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
> | >>>> tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
> | >>>> favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
> | >>>> immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
> | >>>> refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
> | >>>> liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
> | >>>> minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
> | >>>>
> | >>>> Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
> | >>>> destroy the black family and create a black underclass
> | >>>> by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
> | >>>> insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
> | >>>> responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
> | >>>> culture rather than race may help explain the
> | >>>> disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
> | >>>> true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
> | >>>> America's black children are born poor, and that this
> | >>>> fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
> | >>>> that 85 percent of these poor children come from
> | >>>> single-parent homes. It is this circumstance—studies

> | >>>> show that children born into single-parent families are
> | >>>> more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than
> | >>>> children with two parents—rather than "institutional

You're a fuckwit. Right.

0 new messages