Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Cops, Witnesses and Common Sense Affirm George Zimmerman's Version of his Shooting of Trayvon Martin, the Incipient Thug
0 views
Skip to first unread message
RD Sandman
May 24, 2012, 6:26:14 PM5/24/12
to
de...@dudu.org wrote in news:v37tr7d6cdkuivmoi...@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:21:26 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>de...@dudu.org wrote in news:ghfsr7dj9pi11e2aq...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:37:07 -0700, "max headroom"
>>> <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>de...@dudu.org <de...@dudu.org> wrote in
>>>>news:lv9sr7tpe8ug0pl8f...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of
>>>>>>>>>>>> course, a criminal act. You're full of shit, as usual.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anytime a behavior or act creates a fear in a victim---that
is
>>>>>>>>>>> a chargable crime.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, that's a ridiculous lie.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Intimidation (also called cowing) is intentional behavior
>>>>>>>>>> "which would cause a person of ordinary sensibilities" fear of
>>>>>>>>>> injury or harm.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Following someone creates no inherent fear of injury or harm.
>>>>
>>>>>>> You don't know that. Martin described Zimmerman as "Weird crazy
>>>>>>> person". That's more than enough to make a teenager feel in
>>>>>>> danger.
>>>>
>>>>>> Apparently not a strong enough feeling to cause Martin to enter
his
>>>>>> father's girlfriend's house and eschew reversing his course to
>>>>>> confront Zimmerman.
>>>>
>>>>> Um, he was a teenager being followed by an unknown "weird crazy
>>>>> person". Maybe he didn't want the crazy person to know where he
>>>>> lived?...
>>>>
>>>>He had eluded Zimmerman; Zimmerman had no idea where Martin was, much
>>>>less where Martin's father's girlfriend's home was.
>>>
>>> Martin looped around a house
>>
>>Even your cite shows that Martin was following the sidewalk....not
>>looping around houses.
>
> Martin continued east around the house on the corner rather than
> turning and following the road south in the hopes of losing Zimmerman.
There are two routes for Martin to follow. One, the most likely, is to
continue on the sidewalk that cuts through from Twin Trees to Retreat
View Circle and then take the common area sidewalk to his home where he
was saying.
That would also fit with what Zimmerman claims happened. Zimmerman lost
track of him per his statement. He then continued down that same
sidewalk to Retreat View Circle to get a house number. After getting it
he was returning to his vehicle which was parked on Twin Trees and was
going to meet the police at the mailboxes. He said that Martin
approached him from the left. That configuration of sidewalks places
Martin where you would expect him to be if he was, in fact, heading home.
If you look at Martin's other route it would be Martin cutting in between
the groups of townhomes and ending up on the common area sidewalk.
If Zimmerman lost track of Martin, it would make no sense for him to cut
between the houses on Twin Trees since he had no idea where Martin was
headed or where he was staying. Between the two of them, Martin was the
only one who knew he was staying at Brandy Green's townhome.
I am not taking any sides here, just looking at what would be the most
likely paths each may have taken. Zimmerman per his statement and Martin
by knowing where he was going.
> He looped around the house on the corner and headed south towards his
> father's girlfriend's place. Zimmerman continued south then cut
> between the houses and headed Martin off before he could get away.
Think about that for a moment. Zimmerman lost track of Martin and had no
idea where Martin was headed. How would he assume that he could simply
cut around a line of units and have Martin headed off?
--
Road Kill!! It's what's for dinner.......
Sleep well, tonight.....
RD (The Sandman)
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:21:26 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>de...@dudu.org wrote in news:ghfsr7dj9pi11e2aq...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:37:07 -0700, "max headroom"
>>> <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>de...@dudu.org <de...@dudu.org> wrote in
>>>>news:lv9sr7tpe8ug0pl8f...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of
>>>>>>>>>>>> course, a criminal act. You're full of shit, as usual.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anytime a behavior or act creates a fear in a victim---that
is
>>>>>>>>>>> a chargable crime.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, that's a ridiculous lie.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Intimidation (also called cowing) is intentional behavior
>>>>>>>>>> "which would cause a person of ordinary sensibilities" fear of
>>>>>>>>>> injury or harm.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Following someone creates no inherent fear of injury or harm.
>>>>
>>>>>>> You don't know that. Martin described Zimmerman as "Weird crazy
>>>>>>> person". That's more than enough to make a teenager feel in
>>>>>>> danger.
>>>>
>>>>>> Apparently not a strong enough feeling to cause Martin to enter
his
>>>>>> father's girlfriend's house and eschew reversing his course to
>>>>>> confront Zimmerman.
>>>>
>>>>> Um, he was a teenager being followed by an unknown "weird crazy
>>>>> person". Maybe he didn't want the crazy person to know where he
>>>>> lived?...
>>>>
>>>>He had eluded Zimmerman; Zimmerman had no idea where Martin was, much
>>>>less where Martin's father's girlfriend's home was.
>>>
>>> Martin looped around a house
>>
>>Even your cite shows that Martin was following the sidewalk....not
>>looping around houses.
>
> Martin continued east around the house on the corner rather than
> turning and following the road south in the hopes of losing Zimmerman.
There are two routes for Martin to follow. One, the most likely, is to
continue on the sidewalk that cuts through from Twin Trees to Retreat
View Circle and then take the common area sidewalk to his home where he
was saying.
That would also fit with what Zimmerman claims happened. Zimmerman lost
track of him per his statement. He then continued down that same
sidewalk to Retreat View Circle to get a house number. After getting it
he was returning to his vehicle which was parked on Twin Trees and was
going to meet the police at the mailboxes. He said that Martin
approached him from the left. That configuration of sidewalks places
Martin where you would expect him to be if he was, in fact, heading home.
If you look at Martin's other route it would be Martin cutting in between
the groups of townhomes and ending up on the common area sidewalk.
If Zimmerman lost track of Martin, it would make no sense for him to cut
between the houses on Twin Trees since he had no idea where Martin was
headed or where he was staying. Between the two of them, Martin was the
only one who knew he was staying at Brandy Green's townhome.
I am not taking any sides here, just looking at what would be the most
likely paths each may have taken. Zimmerman per his statement and Martin
by knowing where he was going.
> He looped around the house on the corner and headed south towards his
> father's girlfriend's place. Zimmerman continued south then cut
> between the houses and headed Martin off before he could get away.
Think about that for a moment. Zimmerman lost track of Martin and had no
idea where Martin was headed. How would he assume that he could simply
cut around a line of units and have Martin headed off?
--
Road Kill!! It's what's for dinner.......
Sleep well, tonight.....
RD (The Sandman)
de...@dudu.org
May 24, 2012, 7:11:13 PM5/24/12
to
On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:26:14 -0500, RD Sandman
You are accepting Zimmerman's word for it that he lost track of
Martin. It's not like he doesn't have enough reasons to lie.
Martin. It's not like he doesn't have enough reasons to lie.
Randal Scripter
May 24, 2012, 7:15:42 PM5/24/12
to
ditched Zimmerman.
RD Sandman
May 25, 2012, 12:23:26 PM5/25/12
to
de...@dudu.org wrote in news:lvftr79jti265vuqa...@4ax.com:
I am not. I stating that that was in his statement. It is also on the
non emergency audio to dispatch.
non emergency audio to dispatch.
RD Sandman
May 25, 2012, 12:24:12 PM5/25/12
to
Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote in
news:komdndP1d7a9XCPS...@giganews.com:
That, too. That is one of the parts where her testimony and Zimmerman's
statement agree.
news:komdndP1d7a9XCPS...@giganews.com:
statement agree.
Message has been deleted
Randal Scripter
May 25, 2012, 2:18:21 PM5/25/12
to
On 5/25/2012 11:16 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> So---you agree
>
> Mr. Zimmerman WAS stalking, chasing Martin?
No, he doesn't agree with that. Mr. Zimmerman was following Martin, not
"chasing" or "stalking" him.
You know this, too.
>
> Mr. Zimmerman WAS stalking, chasing Martin?
No, he doesn't agree with that. Mr. Zimmerman was following Martin, not
"chasing" or "stalking" him.
You know this, too.
*us*
May 25, 2012, 3:06:50 PM5/25/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:23:26 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>... in his statement...
Zimmerman's a proven liar.
>... in his statement...
Zimmerman's a proven liar.
*us*
May 25, 2012, 3:06:50 PM5/25/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:24:12 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>... Zimmerman's
>statement ...
Zimmerman's been caught in lies already.
>... Zimmerman's
>statement ...
Zimmerman's been caught in lies already.
JohnJohnsn
May 25, 2012, 3:13:19 PM5/25/12
to
RD Sandman
May 25, 2012, 3:15:29 PM5/25/12
to
Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote in
news:5cKdncDhOuRtUSLS...@giganews.com:
*us*
May 25, 2012, 6:59:17 PM5/25/12
to
Zimmerman's a proven liar.
Only a real idiot can't find out about such things.
Message has been deleted
Randal Scripter
May 25, 2012, 10:44:01 PM5/25/12
to
On 5/25/2012 6:02 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his
> truck,
No - about 150 feet. That's not far. It's not nearly as far as Martin
was away from his home - about 235 miles. If Martin hadn't got kicked
out of school, for at least the third time, with a bag of dope, he'd
have been in Miami.
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:15:29 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>>>> Zimmerman's statement agree.
>>>>
>>>> So---you agree
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Zimmerman WAS stalking, chasing Martin?
>>>
>>> No, he doesn't agree with that. Mr. Zimmerman was following Martin,
>>> not "chasing" or "stalking" him.
>>>
>>> You know this, too.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Even she didn't use the term "stalking".
>
> Actually, "she" doesn't have to
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>>>> Zimmerman's statement agree.
>>>>
>>>> So---you agree
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Zimmerman WAS stalking, chasing Martin?
>>>
>>> No, he doesn't agree with that. Mr. Zimmerman was following Martin,
>>> not "chasing" or "stalking" him.
>>>
>>> You know this, too.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Even she didn't use the term "stalking".
>
>
> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his
> truck,
No - about 150 feet. That's not far. It's not nearly as far as Martin
was away from his home - about 235 miles. If Martin hadn't got kicked
out of school, for at least the third time, with a bag of dope, he'd
have been in Miami.
Message has been deleted
Randal Scripter
May 26, 2012, 12:19:22 AM5/26/12
to
On 5/25/2012 9:11 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
Mr. Zimmerman was 150 feet from his truck, you stupid fuck. Martin
sneaked up on him and assaulted him.
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his
>>> truck,
>>
>> No - about 150 feet.
>
> Then how did Martin assault him?
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his
>>> truck,
>>
>> No - about 150 feet.
>
Mr. Zimmerman was 150 feet from his truck, you stupid fuck. Martin
sneaked up on him and assaulted him.
Jack Skolasky
May 26, 2012, 12:24:24 AM5/26/12
to
On 5/25/2012 9:11 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
>>>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his
>>> truck,
>>
>> No - about 150 feet.
>
>>> truck,
>>
>> No - about 150 feet.
>
> Then how did Martin assault him?
With his fists.
Randal Scripter
May 26, 2012, 12:24:48 AM5/26/12
to
On 5/25/2012 9:11 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
>>>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his
>>> truck,
>>
>> No - about 150 feet.
>
>>> truck,
>>
>> No - about 150 feet.
>
> Then how did Martin assault him?
>
> He either disobeyed orders to "stay put"
>
No such orders.
Jack Skolasky
May 26, 2012, 6:13:51 PM5/26/12
to
On 5/25/2012 9:11 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
>>>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his
>>> truck,
>>
>> No - about 150 feet.
>
>>> truck,
>>
>> No - about 150 feet.
>
> Then how did Martin assault him?
With his fists, you fuckwit.
Message has been deleted
max headroom
May 27, 2012, 12:40:12 PM5/27/12
to
Yoor...@Jurgis.net <Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in news:q233s7pvvqqahbev2...@4ax.com:
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:13:51 -0700, Jack Skolasky
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.con> wrote:
>>>>> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his truck,
>>>> No - about 150 feet.
>>> Then how did Martin assault him?
>> With his fists, you fuckwit.
> His arms are 150 long?
> What fucking planet are you on?
Are you saying Martin was standing at Zimmerman's truck, 150' from Zimmerman, when he assaulted him?
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:13:51 -0700, Jack Skolasky
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.con> wrote:
>>>>> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his truck,
>>>> No - about 150 feet.
>>> Then how did Martin assault him?
>> With his fists, you fuckwit.
> What fucking planet are you on?
Are you saying Martin was standing at Zimmerman's truck, 150' from Zimmerman, when he assaulted him?
Jack Skolasky
May 27, 2012, 5:29:16 PM5/27/12
to
On 5/26/2012 7:07 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:13:51 -0700, Jack Skolasky
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:13:51 -0700, Jack Skolasky
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.con> wrote:
>
>>>>> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his
>>>>> truck,
>>>>
>>>> No - about 150 feet.
>>>
>>> Then how did Martin assault him?
>>
>> With his fists, you fuckwit.
>
>
>>>>> The simple fact (evidence) that Mr. Zimmerman was FAR away from his
>>>>> truck,
>>>>
>>>> No - about 150 feet.
>>>
>>> Then how did Martin assault him?
>>
>> With his fists, you fuckwit.
>
> His arms are 150 long?
He sneaked up on Mr. Zimmerman as Z was heading back to his truck. You
*know* this, too - you're just playing dumber than you are, which is
already quite dumb.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 7:07:28 AM5/28/12
to
Zimmerman was told he didn't need to follow his victim.
Zimmerman disregarded that so he could keep stalking
the unarmed innocent pedestrian kid he shot.
Zimmerman disregarded that so he could keep stalking
the unarmed innocent pedestrian kid he shot.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 7:07:28 AM5/28/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:19:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>... stupid ...
That's why you can't understand that Zimmerman
needed to stay in his vehicle and away from his
innocent victim.
>... stupid ...
That's why you can't understand that Zimmerman
needed to stay in his vehicle and away from his
innocent victim.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 7:07:28 AM5/28/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:11:50 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>>No - about 150 feet.
>
>
>Then how did Martin assault him?
>
>He either disobeyed orders to "stay put"---or he did not.
>
>
>Since he confronted his victim (after chasing martin down)---he must
>have narrowed that "150 feet" very considerably.
Indeed.
Since the innocent victim was anything but a 'thug',
we should avoid posting that subject line.
Don't join the racist troll in libeling the dead kid.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*us*
May 28, 2012, 7:07:28 AM5/28/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:24:24 -0700, Lack Skullcapacity <thick....@SouthTeats.con>
wrote:
>... fists.
So you could have a vehicle and a gun and
still end up beaten by a unarmed pedestrian?
How colossally clueless of you.
wrote:
>... fists.
So you could have a vehicle and a gun and
still end up beaten by a unarmed pedestrian?
How colossally clueless of you.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 7:07:28 AM5/28/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>... a bag of dope ...
You sure are.
>... a bag of dope ...
You sure are.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 7:07:28 AM5/28/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:02:13 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:15:29 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Even she didn't use the term "stalking".
>
>truck, carrying a weapon in an act of intimidation, is logically one
>that presupposes "tracking", "stalking", "following", chasing" to the
>extent that zimmerloon was the agressor and Martin was a victim
>
>Legal definition of all those words are not the same as general usage.
>
>Like "perjury"
>
>It's not simply "lying"
>
>3 congressionaly defined components are required for it to be
>"perjury"
Indeed.
Subject line corrected.
>On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:15:29 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Even she didn't use the term "stalking".
>
>Actually, "she" doesn't have to
>
>The simple fact (evidence) that zimmerloon was FAR away from his
>
>truck, carrying a weapon in an act of intimidation, is logically one
>that presupposes "tracking", "stalking", "following", chasing" to the
>extent that zimmerloon was the agressor and Martin was a victim
>
>Legal definition of all those words are not the same as general usage.
>
>Like "perjury"
>
>It's not simply "lying"
>
>3 congressionaly defined components are required for it to be
>"perjury"
Indeed.
Subject line corrected.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 4:44:07 PM5/28/12
to
Martin wasn't a thug at all, according to the
superintendent of his school.
superintendent of his school.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 4:44:07 PM5/28/12
to
Martin had every right to stand his ground and defend himself,
but an unarmed pedestrian kid is no match for an older racist
drug-addict with a vehicle and a gun.
but an unarmed pedestrian kid is no match for an older racist
drug-addict with a vehicle and a gun.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 4:44:07 PM5/28/12
to
Zimmerman totally failed, and took it out on his innocent victim.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 4:44:07 PM5/28/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:13:51 -0700, Lack Skullcapacity <thick....@SouthTeats.con>
wrote:
>... fuckwit.
Don't be so hard on yourself:
you can't get laid and you have
no wit.
Meanwhile, your violent racist
drug-addicted idol is still up on
charges for shooting a kid.
wrote:
>... fuckwit.
Don't be so hard on yourself:
you can't get laid and you have
no wit.
Meanwhile, your violent racist
drug-addicted idol is still up on
charges for shooting a kid.
Gator Bait
May 31, 2012, 1:57:30 PM5/31/12
to
In article <vulvr79imjf4ug1bm...@4ax.com>
One shot, one kill.
No more black thug Traycon Martin.
--
Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:23:26 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >... in his statement...
>
> Zimmerman's a proven good shot.
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:23:26 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >... in his statement...
>
One shot, one kill.
No more black thug Traycon Martin.
--
Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
Gator Bait
May 31, 2012, 2:02:48 PM5/31/12
to
In article <jtlvr79dbteghtfqg...@4ax.com>
Fixed that mistake.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:24:12 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >... Zimmerman's
> >statement ...
>
> Zimmerman's been attacked by liberal lies already.
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:24:12 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >... Zimmerman's
> >statement ...
>
Fixed that mistake.
Singing' wid a sword in ma han'
Jun 1, 2012, 6:21:20 PM6/1/12
to
In article <b730s7pq97ooaov5a...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman's a proven <flush>
excellent shot.
> Only a real idiot can't find out about such things.
Traycon was a real idiot. He got killed.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman's a proven <flush>
excellent shot.
> Only a real idiot can't find out about such things.
Singing' wid a sword in ma han'
Jun 1, 2012, 11:21:18 PM6/1/12
to
In article <r0l7s71leh5ci8pkb...@4ax.com>
Traycon is dead. With a little luck, maybe you will be too.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:13:51 -0700, Lack Skullcapacity <thick....@SouthTeats.con>
> wrote:
>
> >... fuckwit.
>
. racist....drug-addicted idol is shooting up
>
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:13:51 -0700, Lack Skullcapacity <thick....@SouthTeats.con>
> wrote:
>
> >... fuckwit.
>
Traycon is dead. With a little luck, maybe you will be too.
Singing' wid a sword in ma han'
Jun 2, 2012, 1:12:51 AM6/2/12
to
In article <ael7s7dijr625n7q5...@4ax.com>
things but he chose not to do so.
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin had every right to
stop casing private property with the intention of stealing
>
> Martin had every right to
things but he chose not to do so.
Singing' wid a sword in ma han'
Jun 2, 2012, 1:12:52 AM6/2/12
to
In article <d7l7s7lq5tvrkm6rh...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman totally <flush>
solved the Traycon Martin problem and put every other criminal
negro on notice that crime would be rewarded with their untimely
death.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman totally <flush>
solved the Traycon Martin problem and put every other criminal
negro on notice that crime would be rewarded with their untimely
death.
Singing' wid a sword in ma han'
Jun 2, 2012, 1:18:11 AM6/2/12
to
In article <14l7s71esl7mlpebh...@4ax.com>
was screwing Traycon's mom. The supe was Traycon's daddy, along
with Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Barack Obama, Spike Lee and
about 50 other guys because his momma didn't keep track.
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin wasn't a thug at all, according to the
> superintendent of his school.
Yeah, he was a truant who stole things and the superintendent
>
> Martin wasn't a thug at all, according to the
> superintendent of his school.
was screwing Traycon's mom. The supe was Traycon's daddy, along
with Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Barack Obama, Spike Lee and
about 50 other guys because his momma didn't keep track.
Singing' wid a sword in ma han'
Jun 2, 2012, 1:28:33 AM6/2/12
to
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:13:51 -0700, Lack Skullcapacity <thick....@SouthTeats.con>
> wrote:
>
> >... fuckwit.
>
> Don't be so hard on ... violent racist
> wrote:
>
> >... fuckwit.
>
> drug-addicted idol is dead.
That Zimmerman was a good shot. Traycon shouldn't have messed
with him.
On the bright side, maybe all the people Traycon stole from will
get their property back.
Singing' wid a sword in ma han'
Jun 2, 2012, 2:35:07 PM6/2/12
to
In article <vgp7s7tjb05ns6o5p...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On 28 May 2012 18:40:22 -0000, "idiot" <lo...@inattentive.com> wrote:
>
> >... violent ... criminals like ...
>
> ... murdered that innocent ...
Traycon should have kept his hands off the property of others.
* US * wrote:
>
> On 28 May 2012 18:40:22 -0000, "idiot" <lo...@inattentive.com> wrote:
>
> >... violent ... criminals like ...
>
> ... murdered that innocent ...
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:19:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... stupid ...
>
> ... can't understand that ... needed to stay ...away from ...
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:19:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... stupid ...
>
Traycon should have kept his hands off the property of others.
Singing' wid a sword in ma han'
Jun 2, 2012, 3:12:11 PM6/2/12
to
In article <vgp7s7tjb05ns6o5p...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On 28 May 2012 18:40:22 -0000, "idiot" <lo...@inattentive.com> wrote:
>
> >... violent ... criminals like ...
>
> ... murdered that innocent ...
>
* US * wrote:
>
> On 28 May 2012 18:40:22 -0000, "idiot" <lo...@inattentive.com> wrote:
>
> >... violent ... criminals like ...
>
> ... murdered that innocent ...
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:19:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... stupid ...
>
>
> >... stupid ...
>
0 new messages