Re: Race Mixing Stupid
walt tonne
> Genetic Decline of Western Civilization: Denmark as a Case Study
> Kevin MacDonald -- The Occidental Observerhttp://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/05/helmuth-nyborg-on-the-ge...
>
> .. .. Nyborg's latest paper charts past trends and projects IQ changes
> in Denmark as a result of two trends: relaxation of natural selection
> among the traditional Danes, and an influx of low-IQ immigrants. These
> two trends together amount to what he terms a "double relaxation of
> natural selection" .. .. The relaxation of internal selection is
> thought to have begun around 1850 as the fertility of the lower
> classes exceeded the upper classes because of improvements in hygiene
> and reduction in diseases. He cites Lynn's estimate that England lost
> 6.9 IQ points over 90 years (1920-2010) and estimates that Denmark's
> average IQ dropped around 10 points since 1850 due to internal
> relaxation of natural selection.http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
>
> http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
The mestizo illegal immigrants flooding America have a group IQ of
appx. 85. Obsolete
refuse from south of the border. Uncle Suckemoff accepts the scouring
of south and
central America. A biological/social/economic disaster ahead.
Gary Forbis
> The mestizo illegal immigrants flooding America have a group IQ of
> appx. 85. Obsolete
> refuse from south of the border. Uncle Suckemoff accepts the scouring
> of south and
> central America. A biological/social/economic disaster ahead.
Were you able to write that yourself or did you need help?
Don Stockbauer
Hybrid vigor is undisputable.
BruceS
Walt sounds like he comes from a long line of sibling parents. Who
are we to judge the value of his pure genetics? For my part, I would
rather my daughter marry someone who's ethnically different from her
than start dating cousins (no brothers), but maybe my Mongrel American
background has blinded me to the benefits of inbreeding.
Mr. Smartypants
Refers to crossing species, you illiterate ignorant fuckwit.
Barb Knox
"Mr. Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
Before spewing insults you should get your facts straight, otherwise you
end up looking like an IIF yourself.
--
---------------------------
| BBB b \ Barbara at LivingHistory stop co stop uk
| B B aa rrr b |
| BBB a a r bbb | Quidquid latine dictum sit,
| B B a a r b b | altum videtur.
| BBB aa a r bbb |
-----------------------------
Mr. Smartypants
> In article<7KOdnUxdYaWOx3_Q...@giganews.com>,
> "Mr. Smartypants"<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/28/2011 9:13 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote:
>>> On May 28, 12:30 pm, Gary Forbis<forbisga...@msn.com> wrote:
>>>> On May 28, 8:54 am, walt tonne<tonnewalt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The mestizo illegal immigrants flooding America have a group IQ of
>>>>> appx. 85. Obsolete
>>>>> refuse from south of the border. Uncle Suckemoff accepts the scouring
>>>>> of south and
>>>>> central America. A biological/social/economic disaster ahead.
>>>>
>>>> Were you able to write that yourself or did you need help?
>>>
>>> Hybrid vigor is undisputable.
>>
>> Refers to crossing species, you illiterate ignorant fuckwit.
>
> Before spewing insults you should get your facts straight, otherwise you
> end up looking like an IIF yourself.
You stupid mackerl-reeking cunt: there is no "hybrid vigor" resulting
from mixing human ethnicities.
Steve
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
<Heh, heh, heh> What kind of a half-witted moron thinks that human
races represent different species?
Bob LeChevalier
>On May 28, 6:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Genetic Decline of Western Civilization: Denmark as a Case Study
>> Kevin MacDonald -- The Occidental Observerhttp://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/05/helmuth-nyborg-on-the-ge...
>>
>> .. .. Nyborg's latest paper charts past trends and projects IQ changes
>> in Denmark as a result of two trends: relaxation of natural selection
>> among the traditional Danes, and an influx of low-IQ immigrants. These
>> two trends together amount to what he terms a "double relaxation of
>> natural selection" .. .. The relaxation of internal selection is
>> thought to have begun around 1850 as the fertility of the lower
>> classes exceeded the upper classes because of improvements in hygiene
>> and reduction in diseases. He cites Lynn's estimate that England lost
>> 6.9 IQ points over 90 years (1920-2010) and estimates that Denmark's
>> average IQ dropped around 10 points since 1850 due to internal
>> relaxation of natural selection.http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
>>
>> http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
>
>The mestizo illegal immigrants flooding America have a group IQ of
>appx. 85.
At least double that of subhuman racist slime like you.
lojbab
---
Bob LeChevalier - artificial linguist; genealogist
loj...@lojban.org Lojban language www.lojban.org
Barb Knox
Steve <steven...@yahooooo.com> wrote:
Presumably the same sort who thinks that hybrid vigour refers to mating
between species.
To be fair, in the past many non-halfwit racists have believed that
Blacks are a different species from Whites. For example, the Dutch
Reformed Church in apartheid South Africa taught that the Whites are
descended from Adam and Eve, but the Blacks are descended from a mating
between Eve and Satan. No kidding.
Greg Ludlow
> On May 28, 6:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> central America. A biological/social/economic disaster ahead.
what makes a mongrel like you believe that your inbreeding makes you
racially pure?
your balls should be removed, you should be neutered to protect the
bloodlines of the white race. that would prevent your racial and
mental inferiority from polluting society.
Uno Hu
Barb Knox <s...@sig.below> wrote in message
news:see-64962F.1...@news.eternal-september.org
Yep.
They had clasifications: Negroes, Negrillos, Negrittos, and some other
types.
And the Mormons believe that they were left in the oven too long.
Mr. Smartypants
> In article<nnf5u6lav98b9krq9...@4ax.com>,
The hybrid vigor seen in mules and ligers does, of course, come from the
mating of two different species.
euno...@yahoo.com.au
Stupidity is under rated.
Don Stockbauer
Intelligence is under rated.
Any string of characters may be posted to usenet by anyone capable of
doing so.
Geopelia
"Barb Knox" <s...@sig.below> wrote in message
The Biblical version is that we all descend from the sons of Noah.
Blacks descend from Ham, Jews and Arabs descend from Shem, and all the rest
including "whites" descend from Japheth.
It seems there are a few Neanderthal genes in all races except Africans, so
perhaps the rest of us could be considered hybrids from way back.
walt tonne
a variety of of the species just the same that the canine species
spans
from terriers to great danes. Plenty of variation; hounds are great
trailers,
sheep dogs trainable, and on and on. There is uncountable information
regarding a racial groups special abilities. Blacks dominate sports
requiring
speed and agility. The Black has a preponderance of "fast twitch"
muscle
fibers. (certain African groups excepted). And year after dreary year
their
are those who still insist that races are equal in intelligence. We
are facing
a social meltdown i.e. increasing technology eliminating marginal
performers
from any employment possibilities.
*google "jon entine, the last taboo". on athletic performance
advantages
Don Stockbauer
Well, the nice thing about the global brain is it forms if the
substrate individuals (people) have any degree of intelligence and can
use global communications, such as a phone.
Don Stockbauer
wrote:
Cattle are all the same species. Angus, Charolais, you name it. You
crossbreed them and you get hybrid vigor.
Have a nice day here, Mr. SP.
Topaz
Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
preserve the White race. Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its
technical developments and discoveries, are the products of the
creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their
first beginnings must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of
civilization is wholly dependant on such peoples. Should they perish,
all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the
grave."
"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
the blood."
"Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science
and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact
fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded
a superior type of humanity"
"The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the
native Japanese culture, although this characterizes the external
features of the country, which features strike the eye of European
observers on account of their fundamental difference from us; but the
real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous
scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America, that is
to say, of Aryan peoples."
"A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood
thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its
manifestations. A disintegrated national character is the inevitable
consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the
change which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a
people is only an effect of the change that had modified its racial
substance."
"For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and Negroid all
ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized
future for our humanity would be lost forever."
"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a
superior race inter-mixes with an inferior one."
"There may be hundreds of excellent States in this earth, and yet if
the Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should
disappear, all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual
needs of the superior nations to-day would also disappear."
"We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a
revolutionary stand in the world to-day and that we are branded as
revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be determined
by the approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only
by our duty to follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing
this we have reason to believe that posterity will have a clearer
insight"
"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the
State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no
more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquility, so that
everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high
mission indeed to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity
which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth."
George Plimpton
>
> Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
> nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
> country. What happened?
Collapse of empire is what happened. It's what *should* have happened, too.
Jerry Okamura
to "help" the people, which resulted in the "people" not wanting to help
themselves, perhaps?
"George Plimpton" wrote in message
news:ccudnSgcOLXYlXDQ...@giganews.com...
Jerry Okamura
States?
"Topaz" wrote in message news:cr1qu61eug58vhe64...@4ax.com...
Topaz
wrote:
Empires normally collapse due to race mixing. It is a great tragedy.
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Topaz
<okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>They decided that the "people" could not provide for themselves, and decided
>to "help" the people, which resulted in the "people" not wanting to help
>themselves, perhaps?
>
It's about race.
"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
the Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/
Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.
He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.
He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the
Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech
and hear it for yourself.."
Tommy
Topaz
<okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>States?
Portugal
George Plimpton
> They decided that the "people" could not provide for themselves, and
> decided to "help" the people, which resulted in the "people" not wanting
> to help themselves, perhaps?
Garbled gibberish, as usual...
americanpatriot213
hybrid vigor: the children of mixed backgrounds have better immune
systems and so forth. Plus, in mixed children, deleterious recessive
genes are reduced.
George Plimpton
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:40:08 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
> <okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>> States?
>
> Portugal
That's false, of course - both in terms of absolute numbers and
percentage of the population.
Nazi "theories" of racial purity are complete and utter nonsense,
thoroughly discredited and repudiated long ago.
George Plimpton
> "Race-mixing" makes caucasians and everyone else stronger: it's called
> hybrid vigor
That's bullshit. Hybrid vigor refers to a benefit that *may* occur, but
does not always obtain, when crossing species or breeds within a
species. Human ethnicity - what ignorant wannabe Nazis like 'topaz' -
mistakenly call 'race' is not an instance of breed difference, let alone
species difference.
If you knew what the fuck you were talking about, which plainly you
don't, you'd know that not all instances of species or breed
hybridization result in hybrid vigor. If you weren't such a
self-crippled moron, you might be inclined to look up "outbreeding
depression".
Jerry Okamura
"George Plimpton" wrote in message
news:p4qdnVh81JdkhXDQ...@giganews.com...
Garbled gibberish, as usual...
Trouble with the English language?
Jerry Okamura
"Topaz" wrote in message news:h36qu6pbg33eeoscs...@4ax.com...
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:40:08 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
<okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>States?
Portugal
Some data to support that statement would be nice.
Jerry Okamura
"Topaz" wrote in message news:do4qu6dqbhcf2ntcd...@4ax.com...
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:38:55 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
<okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>They decided that the "people" could not provide for themselves, and
>decided
>to "help" the people, which resulted in the "people" not wanting to help
>themselves, perhaps?
>
It's about race.
is one race that much different than another race, or do all "people" want
basically the same thing?
"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
the Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/
Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.
He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.
He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
Is that because of where a person was born, or is that the result of a
government that is barely functioning? Which country gives the "people"
more opportunities to succeed?
George Plimpton
Yes, you do have.
americanpatriot213
die just for caucasians (which would be odd since Christ was not even
European, but middle-eastern).
Mr. Smartypants
Jesus Christ was a black African.
Michael Ejercito
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:02:25 -0700, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not>
> wrote:
>
> >On 6/6/2011 9:59 AM, Topaz wrote:
>
> >> Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
> >> nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
> >> country. What happened?
>
> >Collapse of empire is what happened. It's what *should* have happened, too.
>
> Empires normally collapse due to race mixing. It is a great tragedy.
Persians'? Or the Mongols'?
>
> The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
> nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
> world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
> It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
> the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
> people in India.
>
> All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
> intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
> important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
> the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
> are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
A con artist.
>
> http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
>
> http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
> nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
> country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
> of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
> Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
> preserve the White race.
Have you knocked up some underage white girls recently?
Michael
Topaz
<okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>is one race that much different than another race, or do all "people" want
>basically the same thing?
They might want basically the same thing, but Whites are on average
much more intelligent than Blacks.
>Is that because of where a person was born, or is that the result of a
>government that is barely functioning?
It's because of the race of most of the people in a country.
>Which country gives the "people"
>more opportunities to succeed?
It doesn't matter if they have the same opportunities. Whites are on
average much more intelligent than Blacks.
Topaz
It's a Wonderful Race
by James Bronson
There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it
all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his
father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to
his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for
all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites throughout
history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the
Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and
we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for
thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations
for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we
are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed
peoples."
George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko
nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie
college professors teach you that?" the father asked.
To which the son replied: "That's the truth dad. My anthropology
professor, Dr.Irving Silverstein, says so. He ought to know. Dr.
Silverstein is a well-respected Ph.D. People of your generation just
don't understand because you were raised in a White supremacist racist
society. That's why I've come to admire Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King as
the greatest man in American history. He stood up to the racists of
your generation. Because of him, my generation of White kids is
completely colorblind."
The father angrily replied: "That's bullshit! I've always been
fair-minded and tolerant of people from all backgrounds and races. I
haven't 'oppressed' anybody, and furthermore there's nothing wrong
with being proud of one's own people, including the European race of
people. Your race is in your blood. It's like an extension of your
biological family and you ought to be proud of your European heritage
and identity, just like every other racial group in America is proud
of its. Why is it OK for them to have a strong sense of racial
identity but it's evil for us Europeans to feel that way?"
The young "intellectual" laughed at his father. "Come on dad, that's
the kind of crap Hitler tried to peddle. Those racist attitudes were
discredited years ago. There's only one race and that's the human
race. Diversity is our greatest strength. Differences in so-called
"race" are as insignificant as differences in belly buttons. And
besides, UN statistics now show that low White birth rates, along with
the fact that we live in an multicultural
society, will mean that Europeans and their ethnocentrist and racist
culture will have died out by the end of the century," young George
said.
Turning red with anger, the father yelled: "You are a walking cliché
you know that boy? And you think it's a good thing that the European
peoples of the world will have faded out and ceased to exist?" Young
George replied; "I think it's great! It will mean the end of racism
and the end of hate. The oppressed peoples of the world would have
been better off if us racist Europeans had never existed to begin
with."
Suddenly there was a blast of cold wind, an explosion, and a huge
smoke cloud. When the smoke had settled, George found himself alone
and lost in a cold open field. An angel named Clarence then appeared
to him and said "Well George, you've got your wish."
George asked: "Where am I? What's going on here? And who are you?"
The angel answered, "George, I'm Clarence the Angel. I was sent here
to show you what the world would have been like if Europeans, or
Whites, had never existed. You now live in a world where Europeans
never existed."
"Oh. That's cool. I'll have no problem adapting because there's not a
racist bone in my body. And when I get back to my world, I'll be able
to tell my professor and my friends how great this non-racist world
was. Say, I'm freezing my ass off out here. Where's the nearest
motel?"
"Motel?" replied the angel. "There are no motels here in what was once
called North America. But there are some caves up in those mountains
where you can find shelter."
"Caves? No way man. I want a nice warm bed to sleep in."
"I don't think you understand George. There are no buildings here in
non-white America because the evil Europeans never came here to build
them. Whites never existed, remember? The natives live in tents. Would
you like to go meet some local Indians? Perhaps they'll let you stay
in a tent."
"A tent? But it's 10 degrees outside?...Oh well. It's better than a
cave I suppose. Let's go talk to these Indians...... Wait a second,
are these Indians friendly or hostile?"
"Why, George, that's a racist question to ask. Just because some
Indians were brutal savages who scalped their victims alive, it
doesn't mean they all were" said the angel sarcastically.
"I know that Clarence. And I'm not a racist. I hate racism.
Nonetheless, I'd feel safer if I could have a gun to defend myself if
they turn out to be violent."
"Gun?" replied the angel. "There are no guns for you to defend
yourself with. Firearms were invented by evil Europeans. Though we
could make a spear with those twigs over there."
"That's too much work. Give me a telephone then. I'll call the Indians
to ask if it's OK."
"Telephone"? replied the angel. There are no telephones here.
Alexander Graham Bell was another evil white man, so he never existed.
No Europeans remember?" "Forget it then" replied George. "I'll sleep
in the damn cave."
Upon arriving at the cave, a shivering George asked the angel for a
lighter so that he could light a fire. "A lighter?" replied Clarence.
"There are no lighters here, and no matches. Those are European
gadgets and evil Europeans never existed remember? If you want to get
warm, you need to do like the locals do and start rubbing twigs
together."
"Oh come on man! You mean to tell me these people still rub sticks
together for fire?"
"That's right George. The Indians live exactly as they did before the
evil pilgrims arrived from Europe just a few centuries ago." said the
angel sarcastically.
"I refuse to stay in this cold cave and I damn sure ain't gonna light
a fire with twigs, and I refuse to sleep in a teepee. I'll go to South
America. I can make it in a warmer climate and I'll adapt quickly to
the great Incan civilization I learned about at college. Since
European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed, the
Incans will still be there.
... I need a car"
"Car?" replied the angel. "There are no cars here. Daimler and Benz,
the evil German inventors of the internal combustion engine, were
never born..nor was Henry Ford. There are no paved roads either. This
is a world without evil Europeans remember?"
"No cars! Oh. I'll just have to take a train."
"There are no trains in this world either George. Evil Europeans
weren't here to build locomotive engines or to discover the many uses
of coal, oil and gas, or to build trains or lay tracks. But I'll allow
you to cheat just a bit. Grab hold of my magic robe and we'll fly
south."
George touched the angel's robe and they flew south until they arrived
in an abandoned mud hut in the midst of Incan territory. George was
grateful for the warm weather but it wasn't long until he began to
complain about the heat and humidity.
"Clarence, this hut is a little shithole and I'm sweating up a storm
here. Get me an air-conditioner please."
"Air-conditioner?" replied the angel. "There are no air-conditioners
here. Air conditioning and refrigeration were inventions created by
evil White men." "What?!! You mean to tell me that in the year 2002
these people still haven't figured out a way to keep themselves or
their food cool? a frustrated George asked.
"No George, they haven't. And they never will."
"This is ridiculous. Let's go to the main city to see the Emperor. I
can't live like this. Where's a car...oh I forget...no cars! Dammit
I'll walk. let's go."
After walking through the jungle for about an hour or so, it began to
get dark. George then asked Clarence to give him a flashlight so that
he could see. "Flashlight? Sorry George, but Thomas Edison was an evil
White man too...and he was never born. There are some branches over
there if you want to make a torch."
"Never mind that!" George shouted back.
By morning time, Clarence and George had arrived at the temple of the
Incans. A bloody human sacrifice was in progress. George turned to
Clarence and cried, "They're going to butcher that poor soul! Somebody
has got to stop this. What horrible murdering beasts! Can't anyone
stop them?"
The angel replied "I'm afraid not. Ritual killings are common place
here."Those evil European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro
never existed so the Incans just continued their brutal ways. In fact,
it was the oppressed peoples themselves who made up the bulk of the
Spanish armed forces. The people saw the Spaniards as liberators who
would rid them of the oppressive Incan and Mayan rulers and give them
a better life."
"I can't blame them for helping the Spaniards then. This is a horrible
place. Get me out of this shithole now!" said George.
'Where would you like to go?" Clarence replied.
George said: "Take me to Africa, maybe there's a more advanced and
humane civilization there that I can fit into. Where the nearest
airport?"
"Oh, I forgot...no Wright Brothers." George said. "How about a boat?"
"Boats?" replied the angel. "I'm afraid the most seaworthy rafts
available to you won't be of much help in crossing the vast Atlantic
Ocean. The great Viking sailors and European navigators never existed.
No Phoenicians, no Leif Erickson, no Henry the Navigator, no Columbus,
no Magellan, no Hudson and no Robert Fulton. Even if you could build
your own ship, there would be no compass for you to navigate with and
no sextant either. I'm afraid you're stuck here George."
"Can I touch your robe and fly to Africa then" asked George.
"You're cheating again George, but all right. Touch my robe and we'll
fly to Africa."
When they arrived in Africa, George saw thousands of half-naked
African tribesmen being herded along a dirt path. They were guarded by
other Africans with spears. "What are they doing to those poor men?"
George asked Clarence.
"They are being enslaved by another tribe. Slavery was common in
Africa long before the whites arrived." Clarence said. "In fact, most
of the slaves who were shipped to the Americas were sold to the slave
traders by African tribal leaders."
"That's so sad.' George said. "I want to meet Martin Luther King.
Since his White assassin never existed, this great man should still be
alive. He's probably a great tribal chief somewhere and leader of an
advanced civilization. He will free these slaves from their African
masters. Take me to him Clarence."
Clarence led George to a little hut deep in the heart of Africa. The
naked women and children looked at George in wonder. The young men
were out on a hunt but the older men stayed behind. George was led to
the dingy little hut of the tribal witchdoctor and spiritual leader.
There he saw a wild-looking man with a necklace of teeth around his
neck and a huge ring pierced through his nose. "What the hell is that?
George asked.
"Meet Witch-doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga" Clarence said. He never
became Reverend Martin Luther King because there were no universities
or seminaries built to educate him. Europeans weren't there to create
such opportunities. But he did become the tribe's spiritual leader. He
specializes in casting evil spells. Perhaps he can help you?"
The witch doctor gazed in wonder at George. Then he motioned to his
henchmen to seize young George. The tribesmen grabbed hold of George
and tied him to a nearby tree.
"Stop it! Let me go. What are they going to do to me?" cried George
hysterically.
"They're going to perform a ritual killing on you George. The good
doctor King...I mean Kinga -- believes that by cutting your heart out
while you are still alive, it will bring good fortune and fertility to
his tribe," laughed Clarence.
"Clarence! Clarence! Help me Clarence! Help me!
"But George, you told me that you wanted to go to Africa and to meet
your hero Reverend King."
George said: "This part of Africa has not developed yet. I can see
that now. Take me to North Africa where Egypt and Carthage established
great civilizations. Just get me out of here, please."
Just as the witch doctor's spear was about to carve out George's
heart, George vanished into thin air. He then found himself on the
banks of the river Nile in Egypt.
"Thank you Clarence. Thank you," George said. "I don't understand it
Clarence. Why does so much of the world remain so brutal and
primitive? I learned during Black History Month about many talented
black inventors and scientists. Garrett Morgan, George Washington
Carver, Benjamin Banneker, Granville Woods. Then there's Dr. Carson,
the preeminent brain surgeon in all of America. Where are these men?"
Clarence replied: "Don't you understand yet? America, and Africa,
exist exactly as they did before the Europeans discovered them.
Civilization as you had known it had only been introduced to these
people just a few centuries ago by the Europeans. There are no
universities, no hospitals, no means of transportation other than
animals, no science, no medicine, no machines. In fact, the wheel
hasn't even been discovered in Sub-Saharan
Africa! Those black scientists, inventors, doctors, athletes, and
entertainers you speak of were never given the opportunity to realize
their full human potential because Europeans weren't around to
introduce higher civilization and learning to them. There are no
George Washington Carvers in this non-European world, no Dr. Carsons,
no Booker T. Washingtons, no Benjamin Bannekers, no Michael Jordans,
no Oprah Winfreys, no Bill Cosbys, no..."
"Stop it! That can't be!" cried George. "Let's walk over to the great
pyramids of Egypt right now and I'll show you one of the great wonders
of the world .....built by non-Whites"
They walked a few miles before George stopped and asked where the
nearest toilet was. "Toilets?" replied the angel. There are no toilets
or urinals in this world. Plumbing was developed by evil Europeans.
The people in this non-White world still relieve themselves in open
fields."
Clarence turned around so George could do his business. "I need some
toilet paper." George said.
"Toilet paper?" replied the angel. "There..."
"I know. I know. Toilet paper hasn't been invented yet. Just hand me a
rag then".
Clarence obliged and the two of them went on their way.
"I don't understand. According to my recollections from Geography
class, the great pyramids should be near this very spot. We ought to
be able to see them from miles away," said George.
"Well, George, I'm sure your professors at the college never told you
this, but the ancient Egyptians were not black or brown. They were
Caucasians. The anthropologists who examined the Egyptian mummies
confirmed this fact. There are no pyramids and no Sphinx either. And
the Carthaginians were White too."
George became depressed, but he was determined to prove his beliefs.
"What's in Europe?" he asked.
"Europe became populated by Huns and other Asiatic tribes. They've
settled down a bit but life is much the same as it is in North
America. A nomadic existence based on hunting and food gathering. No
great cities, no science, no buildings, no culture, no fine art - just
a hard daily struggle against life and the elements of nature. In a
Europe without evil Whites, the Roman Empire never existed nor did the
Greeks. There was no Renaissance either."
"Take me to Asia then. Surely the great civilizations of Persia,
India, China, and Japan will suit me" George said. "Clarence, to the
Taj Mahal please." "The Taj Mahal?" replied the angel. "Don't you know
that the ancient Persian and Indian civilizations were established by
ancient Indo-European tribes who crossed the Himalayas? They are the
ones who civilized India and built the Taj Mahal. Those are the great
civilizations
that Marco Polo, Columbus, and others were searching for.Did you know
that Iran is Persian for "land of the Aryan?"
George said: "Don't tell me that the Indians were White men! That
can't be. In the world I came from, I knew many Indians and they were
not White!"
Clarence explained: "As the centuries passed, the Indo-Europeans who
created Indian civilization intermarried with the native majorities
who populated the Indian subcontinent. Gradually there were less and
less evil White people until they faded out completely, along with the
advanced civilization they had built. You will notice that there are
still a few white-skinned and fair-haired Indians and Pakistanis
around today -- in the world you came from that is.
George became worried. He knew he could never fit into the harsh
primitive world he had been thrust into. Suddenly he thought of Japan.
"Japan! I'll show you now Clarence. Take me to Japan. If the Japanese
can make TVs and cameras then I'm sure I'll find a decent civilization
that I can live in."
Clarence transported George to Japan. George observed that Japanese
society was the most orderly, advanced and civil that he had seen, but
it seemed as if almost everyone was either a rice farmer, a fisherman,
or a soldier. There were no cars, no skyscrapers, no lights, no
stereos, no sciences, no technologies, no universities. It was a
stagnant agricultural society that seemed to have reached its high
water mark and was incapable of moving forward. George knew he could
not live here either.
Clarence explained to George: "Even the industrious Japanese and
Chinese peoples had to rely on the evil Europeans to build the modern
Asia that you had in mind. In this world, Japan exists exactly as it
did before Commodore Perry's American naval ships arrived in Japan in
the 1850s. There's no industry, no technology, no Fuji film, no Sony,
no Hitachi, no Panasonic, no Toyota, no Sushi bars, no baseball...none
of the trappings or comforts of modern life. These things don't exist
in Japan or anywhere else because
Europeans weren't there to create them and share them with the rest of
the world. Would you care for a bowl of rice George?"
George began to feel sick in both his body and his mind. Not only was
he depressed, but exposure to the harsh elements of nature had left
him physically ill. "Clarence, I seem to have contracted some type of
sickness. I must have some anti-biotics."
"Anti-biotics? There's no...
"Oh Shut up already! Then just take me back to the world as it was!"
"Sorry George. I'm not authorized to do that. Only my boss can make
that call." Clarence said to him: "You see George. Your father was
right. You really had a wonderful race. Don't you see what a foolish
mistake it is to be ashamed and guilty about your own people, and to
let them die out? This is what the world would be like without the
creative spark of Edison and Ford and Pasteur and Marconi. No great
scientists, or mathematicians, or inventors or fine artists. No
Archimedes, no Aristotle, no Socrates, no
Alexander, no Renaissance, no Newton, no Kepler, no Goddard, no
Mendel, no Tesla, no Faraday, no Guttenberg, no Shakespeare, no
Dickens, no Twain, no Mozart, no Beethoven, no Da Vinci, no
Michelangelo, no Galileo, no Copernicus. No Venice, no Paris, no
Lisbon, no Madrid, no Zurich, no Berlin, no St. Petersburg, no
Budapest, no Rome, no Milan, no Vienna, no London, no New York, no
Rio, no Sydney. No orchestras, no museums, no universities, no
hospitals, no libraries, no theaters, no radio, no books, no
television, no electricity, no refrigeration, no heating, no plumbing,
no houses, no steel, no stadiums, no vaccines, no cars, no planes, no
trains, no ships, no
dentists, no surgeons, no computers, no telephones, and most important
- there's no creative genius to be found that could create and sustain
such a high level of civilization. There's nothing for the people of
this world to build upon. It's just a daily struggle for subsistence.
A brutal planet where the few people who aren't mired in eternal
ignorance and darkness have reached their peak of civilization and are
advancing no further."
Clarence went on to lecture the broken and depressed young man for
seven days straight. He covered everything. History, science,
economics, philosophy, art, literature, fine music, architecture,
medicine, politics, agriculture, religion, and all the creations and
contributions that the European peoples had made in every conceivable
field of human endeavor. George listened closely to every word. He
felt like a man who had been
reborn.
After his lecture, Clarence the Angel floated away towards heaven. "I
hope you have found all this to be educational, and I hope you have
learned an important lesson. Enjoy your world George!" mocked the
departing angel.
George began to sob like a baby. It was the year 2002 and he was alone
and hungry in a backwards world where Europeans had never existed. He
cried out to the stars: "Please God. I see what a fool I've been. I
understand now what my father was trying to tell me. I want to go back
to the world that I came from. A world where Europeans not only
existed, but blessed the rest of humanity world with their unique
creative ability. I want to live in a civilized world. Please
God!...take me back!...take me back!...Oh God....please."
Suddenly George was transported back to his college dormitory. Drunk
with joy, George jumped into the showers before he could even take his
clothes off!.
"Warm water! and soap! Life is beautiful!" he screamed.
George's floor mates looked at him as if he was crazy. "George! Have
you gone crazy?" asked a bewildered schoolmate.
"No my friend. I haven't taken leave of my senses. I've come to them!"
George replied. George then began to sing classic European folk songs
in the shower. Miraculously, he was able to sing in many different
languages. He sang O Sole Mio in Italian, Amazing Grace in English,
Gloire Immortelle in French, Das Ist Der Tag in German, and also
Belgian, Spanish and French ballads and waltzes. Tears of sheer joy
began to stream down his cheeks. The degenerate music of Hip-Hop and
Rap lost all of its appeal to young George.
After his shower, George drove to a nearby restaurant and ordered two
whole entrees. One was Lasagna and the other was a delicious Veal
Marsala. With his Italian food he had a Greek salad with Spanish
olives and Russian dressing, drank a whole bottle of French wine,
followed by a German pastry for dessert. He finished his meal off with
a hot cup of English tea and a Cuban cigar.
George said out loud: "Oh those European peoples and their delicious
cuisine. Clarence was right after all. What a wonderful race!"
George was happy, but at the same time he realized there was much work
to be done. He thought of all those poor whites in Rhodesia and South
Africa who were being murdered and raped ever since they gave up
control of those once-European nations. He thought of the many
thousands of qualified Whites who were passed up for good jobs and
college entrance because of racial quotas that discriminate against
Europeans. He thought about the declining birthrates among all the
European nations of the world. He remembered that
Europeans everywhere were dwindling in numbers every year even as
their own nations were being flooded with third world immigration. He
recalled the O.J. Simpson verdict and how millions of blacks in
America cheered when that brutal double murderer was set free by a
black jury after he stabbed two Whites to death. He remembered the Los
Angeles riots of 1992, where dozens of Whites were dragged out of
their vehicles and killed like dogs in the streets by packs of
White-hating monsters who were never even punished! He remembered the
time when Jesse Jackson led a cheer at Stanford University: "Hey Hey
Ho Ho, Western Civ. has got to go!" His European blood began to
boil in righteous indignation when he recalled how Jesse Jackson once
said he had spit in White people's food when he was a young restaurant
worker. George now understood that that his people were on a collision
course with worldwide disaster and genocide. George realized that this
great people must not perish from the face of the earth.
George could not wait to see his father. He longed to embrace him and
apologize for all of the foolish and disrespectful things he had said
to him. But first, George had a score to settle with a certain college
professor. He walked into Dr. Silverstein's auditorium and quietly
took a seat in the back row. The nasal voiced Silverstein was
lecturing on and on
about racial and gender inequalities in European-centered
civilizations. It was vintage Silverstein. George's impressionable
White schoolmates, with their baggy pants, hip-hop clothes and
backwards baseball caps, were swallowing Silverstein's poison pills
hook, line and sinker. After letting Silverstein spew his cultural
poison for about 15 minutes or so, George raised his hand so that he
could give the professor a piece of his newly educated mind.
"George? Is that you? I remember you from last semester. I wasn't
aware that you were here today. I failed to recognize you in that
shirt and tie, and without your earrings. You must have enjoyed my
course so much that you signed up again eh? Class, I'd like for you to
meet George. He was one of my brightest students last semester. He
truly has a thorough grasp of the ideas presented in this course.
George, would you be so kind as to tell my class about that brilliant
term paper you wrote about European racism,
imperialism, and the need for monetary reparations?"
That's when young George let loose on the unsuspecting Professor.
"ENOUGH! You scheming devil! You mendacious fabricator of falsehoods!
You pusillanimous purveyor of pinko propaganda! How dare you try to
corrupt and manipulate our young minds when your filthy lies. We
Europeans have nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to apologize for, and
everything to be proud of. And most of all, we don't owe anybody
jack-shit - not one thin dime! To the contrary, it is the rest of
humanity that owes us a debt which can never be repaid! We are the
rightful heirs and protectors of a rich cultural heritage. You vile
manipulator! We are the sons of the Romans, the sons of
the Greeks, the Celtics, the Vikings, the Normans, the Saxons. Why do
you inflict shame and guilt upon us? We Europeans didn't just
contribute to civilization...WE ARE CIVILIZATION! And I declare that I
will no longer tolerate you shithead "intellectuals" trying to tear
our people down. Never again will we walk on eggshells when we speak,
always fearing that we might be called "racist." I no longer care what
people think. All that matters is the truth which you have sought to
pervert!"
"What are you up to anyway? Why do you to corrupt my young peers by
shoving false heroes down their throats. Enough of your Marxist games
of divide and conquer, you commie pinko subversive! I don't want to
learn anymore about Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton or
Black History Month. They would not have amounted to anything without
the institutions of high civilization created by the European peoples.
I'm going to set this class straight about who the truly great men of
history are - the European
statesmen, scientists, explorers, monarchs, navigators, conquerors,
inventors, artists, writers, philosophers - the innovative giants of
history that you and your ilk have erased from our collective
memories. You speak of a world liberated from European influence?
Permit me tell your students about such a world, Silverstein, because
I can speak from personal experience, you wretched little conspiring
monster!"
Silverstein turned white as a ghost. He was shell-shocked and rendered
speechless for the first time in his career! Never in all of his years
at the University had a student dared to so boldly challenge his
falsehoods. Speaking from the heart as well as the mind, and with an
eloquence he never thought he could muster, George broke out into a
60-minute monologue on history, science, philosophy, culture, and all
the other attributes that
constitute high civilization. The young students were captivated by
George's brilliant oratory. Many were moved to tears. By the end of
his tirade, George's reawakened classmates were thundering their
approval of his speech. The class gave George a standing ovation and
they thanked him for helping them rediscover and reclaim their own
sense of pride and lost identity. The unstoppable power of truth had
melted away years of Marxist guilt tripping, self hate, wimpishness
and cultural brainwashing in just one unforgettable hour. The inspired
students proceeded to storm out of Silverstein's class,
throwing their hip-hop baseball caps and nose earrings at him as they
stampeded out and vowed never to return. They lifted George up upon
their shoulders and carried him out of the auditorium like a
conquering hero. With a glint in his eye, George glanced up towards
the sky, winked and said "Thank you, Clarence."
Dr. Silverstein was left humiliated and visibly shaken. He knew that
these reawakened European kids could never again be brainwashed with
"political correctness" and White guilt. Silverstein's greatest fear
was that more of these proud European youths would one day reawaken
and take their country and civilization back from the Silversteins of
the world.
Silverstein was worried, but he remained confident that most young men
and women would never learn the truth about their glorious past and
unique creative abilities. After all, the mass media, Hollywood, the
music industry, the colleges, and the public schools are all
controlled by "liberals" like Dr. Silverstein. With the power of
political correctness in their hands, they can continue to tear down
our European ancestors, destroy our
institutions and traditions, instigate blacks and other races against
the whites, flood America with third-world immigration, and push
"hip-hop" music, homosexuality, and other garbage onto a weak,
confused and morally degenerate youth. After reflecting upon these
facts, Silverstein smiled a devilish grin and muttered to himself: "A
few of these European sheep may wake up to what's being done to them,
but the majority of these idiots never will." And he smiled
again....and laughed with diabolical Marxist glee. Then
he repeated to himself "No...they will never figure it all out until
it's too late."
Or will they?
Topaz
wrote:
>>
>>> Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>>> States?
>>
>> Portugal
>
>That's false, of course - both in terms of absolute numbers and
>percentage of the population.
Which has more blonds, Portugal of the United States?
>
>Nazi "theories" of racial purity are complete and utter nonsense,
>thoroughly discredited and repudiated long ago.
Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
they were outnumbered. Compare the size of Germany to the size of the
Jewish controlled countries, the USA and the USSR. Hitler made Germany
great. Of course the Jew parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately
the bad side won the war.
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural
forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and
keep humanity in the dark. It is so to speak the mortar that holds the
enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class,
ideology and interests. Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish
roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same
fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the
nations and keep them in its service. How deep its influence on public
opinion is in all the enemy countries and many neutral nations is
plain to see that it may never be named in newspapers, speeches and
radio broadcasts. There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes
anti-Semitism - or in plain English, public education about the Jewish
Question - by death. The expert in these matters is in no way
surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New
Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid
throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its
goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the
nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a
discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.
It is little different in the plutocratic nations. There the struggle
against the impudent usurpation of the Jewish race is not punished by
the executioner, rather by death through economic and social boycott
and by intellectual terror. This has the same effect in the end.
Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were made by the Jewry. They enjoy its
full support and reward it with their full protection. They present
themselves in their speeches as upright men of civil courage, yet one
never hears even a word against the Jews, even though there is growing
hatred among their people as a result of this war, a hatred that is
fully justified. Jewry is a tabu theme in the enemy countries. It
stands outside every legal boundary and thus becomes the tyrant of its
host peoples. While enemy soldiers fight, bleed and die at the front,
the Jews make money from their sacrifice on the stock exchanges and
black markets. If a brave man dares to step forward and accuse the
Jews of their crimes, he will be mocked and spat on by their press,
chased from his job or otherwise impoverished, and be brought into
public contempt. Even that is apparently not enough for the Jews. They
want to bring Soviet conditions to the whole world: to give Jewry
absolute power and freedom from prosecution. He who objects or even
debates the matter gets a bullet in the back of his head or an axe
through his neck. There is no worse tyranny than this. This is the
epitome of the public and secret disgrace that Jewry inflicts on the
nations that deserve freedom.
That is all long behind us. Yet it still threatens us in the distance.
We have, it is true, entirely broken the power of the Jews in the
Reich, but they have not given up. They did not rest until they had
mobilized the whole world against us. Since they could no longer
conquer Germany from within, they want to try it from without. Every
Russian, English and American soldier is a mercenary of this world
conspiracy of a parasitic race. Given the current state of the war,
who could still believe that they are fighting and dying at the front
for the national interests of their countries! The nations want a
decent peace, but the Jews are against it. They know that the end of
the war would mean the dawning knowledge of humanity of the unhealthy
role that International Jewry played in preparing for and carrying out
this war. They fear being unmasked, which has in fact become
unavoidable and must inevitably come, just as the day follows the
night. That explains their raging bursts of hatred against us, which
are only the result of their fear and their feelings of inferiority.
They are too eager, and that makes them suspicious. International
Jewry will not succeed in turning this war to its advantage. Things
are already too far along. The hour will come in which all the peoples
of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. Here too
things can only go so far.
It is an old, often-used method of International Jewry to discredit
education and knowledge about its corrupting nature and drives,
thereby depending on the weaknesses of those people who easily confuse
cause with effect. The Jews are also masters at manipulating public
opinion, which they dominate through their network of news agencies
and press concerns that reaches throughout the world. The pitiful
illusion of a free press is one of the methods they use to stupefy the
publics of enemy lands. If the enemy press is as free as it pretends
to be, let it take an open position, for or against, on the Jewish
Question. It will not do that because it cannot and may not do so. The
Jews love to mock and criticize everything except themselves, although
everyone knows that they are most in need of public criticism. This is
where the so-called freedom of the press in enemy countries ends.
Newspapers, parliaments, statesmen and church leaders must be silent
here. Crimes and vices, filth and corruption are covered by the
blanket of love. The Jews have total control of public opinion in
enemy countries, and he who has that is also master of all of public
life. Only the nations that have to accept such a condition are to be
pitied. The Jews mislead them into believing that the German nation is
backward. Our alleged backwardness is actually proof of our progress.
We have recognized the Jews as a national and international danger,
and from this knowledge have drawn compelling conclusions. This German
knowledge will become the knowledge of he world at the end of this
war. We think it our primary duty to do everything in our power to
make that happen.
Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull
and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the
incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has
guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as
noble, beautiful and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews
hate it. They despite our culture and learning, which they perceive as
towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and
social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives, They
are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their
anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that
is entirely free of the Jews. That is the prime cause of its political
and economic balance. Since their expulsion from the German national
body has made it impossible for them to shake this balance from
within, they lead the nations they have deceived in battle against us
from without. It is fine with them, in fact it is part of their plan,
that Europe in the process will lose a large part of its cultural
values. The Jews had no part in their creation. They do not understand
them. A deep racial instinct tells them that since these heights of
human creative activity are forever out of their reach, they must
attack them today with hatred. The day is not distant when the nations
of Europe, yes, even those of the whole world, will shout: The Jews
are guilty for all our misfortunes! They must be called to account,
and soon and thoroughly!
International Jewry is ready with its alibi. Just as during the great
reckoning in Germany, they will attempt to look innocent and say that
one needs a scapegoat, and they are it. But that will no longer help
them, just as it did not help them during the National Socialist
revolution, The proof of their historical guilt, in details large and
small, is so plain that they can no longer be denied even with the
most clever lies and hypocrisy.
Who is it that drives the Russians, the English and the Americans into
battle and sacrifices huge numbers of human lives in a hopeless
struggle against the German people? The Jews! Their newspapers and
radio broadcasts spread the songs of war while the nations they have
deceived are led to the slaughter. Who is it that invents new plans of
hatred and destruction against us every day, making this war into a
dreadful case of self-mutilation and self-destruction of European life
and its economy, education and culture? The Jews! Who devised the
unnatural marriage between England and the USA on one side and
Bolshevism on the other, building it up and jealously ensuring its
continuance? Who covers the most perverse political situations with
cynical hypocrisy from a trembling fear that a new way could lead the
nations to realize the true causes of this terrible human catastrophe?
The Jews, only the Jews! They are named Morgenthau and Lehmann and
stand behind Roosevelt as a so-called brain trust. They are named
Mechett and Sasoon and serve as Churchill's money bags and order
givers. They are named Kaganovitsch and Ehrenburg and are Stalin's
pacesetters and intellectual spokesmen. Wherever you look, you see
Jews. They march as political commisars behind the Red army and
organize murder and terror in the areas conquered by the Soviets. They
sit behind the lines in Paris and Brussels, Rome and Athens, and
fashion their reins from the skin of the unhappy nations that have
fallen under their power.
That is the truth. It can no longer be denied, particularly since in
their drunken joy of power and victory the Jews have forgotten their
ordinarily so carefully maintained reserve and now stand in the
spotlight of public opinion. They no longer bother, apparently
believing that it is no longer necessary, that their hour has come.
And this is their mistake, which they always make when think
themselves near their great goal of anonymous world domination.
Thoughout the history of the nations, whenever this tragic situation
developed, a good providence saw to it that the Jews themselves became
the grave diggers of their own hopes. They did not destroy the healthy
peoples, rather the sting of their parasitic effects brought the
realization of the looming danger to the forefront and led to the
greatest sacrifices to overcome it. At a certain point, they become
that power that always wants evil but creates good. It will be that
way this time too.
The fact that the German nation was the first on earth to recognize
this danger and expel it from its organism is proof of its healthy
instincts. It therefore became the leader of a world struggle whose
results will determine of fate and the future of International Jewry.
We view with complete calm the wild Old Testament tirades of hatred
and revenge of Jews throughout the world against us. They are only
proof that we are on the right path. They cannot unsettle us. We gaze
on them with sovereign contempt and remember that these outbursts of
hate and revenge were everyday events for us in Germany until that
fateful day for International Jewry, 30 January 1933, when the world
revolution against the Jews that threateend not only Germany, but all
the other nations, began.
It will not cease before it has reached its goal. The truth can not be
stopped by lies or force. It will get through. The Jews will meet
their Cannae at the end of this war. Not Europe, rather they will
lose. They may laugh at this prophecy today, but they have laughed so
often in the past, and almost as often they stopped laughing sooner or
later. Not only do we know precisely what we want, we also know
precisely what we do not want. The deceived nations of he Earth may
still lack the knowledge they need, but we will bring it to them. How
will the Jews stop that in the long run? They believe their power
rests on sure foundations, but it stands on feet of clay. One hard
blow and it will collapse, burying the creators of the misfortunes of
the world in its ruins.
Topaz
<okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Topaz" wrote in message news:h36qu6pbg33eeoscs...@4ax.com...
>
>On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:40:08 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
><okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>>States?
>
>Portugal
>
>
>
>Some data to support that statement would be nice.
In race mixing the blonds are the first to go. They don't have a lot
of blonds in Portugal.
George Plimpton
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:31:59 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
> <okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> is one race that much different than another race, or do all "people" want
>> basically the same thing?
>
> They might want basically the same thing, but Whites are on average
> much more intelligent than Blacks.
Irrelevant. You should evaluate an individual based on his own
measurable and determinable attributes, not some average of an abstract
group to which he belongs. There are literally millions of blacks who
are more intelligent and/or far more accomplished than you.
George Plimpton
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:28:38 -0700, George Plimpton<geo...@si.not>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>>> Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>>>> States?
>>>
>>> Portugal
>>
>> That's false, of course - both in terms of absolute numbers and
>> percentage of the population.
>
> Which has more blonds, Portugal of the United States?
The number of blonds doesn't indicate anything. Japan doesn't have any
blonds, either - except perhaps a few due to...(get ready for it)...race
mixing.
>> Nazi "theories" of racial purity are complete and utter nonsense,
>> thoroughly discredited and repudiated long ago.
>
>
> Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong.
No, what proved they were wrong were philosophy logic and science.
Topaz
"There's this hilarious disconnect in the sheeple brain, where they
have been progressively brainwashed over a forty year period into
believing that once they have committed suicide themselves, an
identical civilization will be left behind except with a different
demographic makeup. They will yank the white tablecloth out from under
the dinnerware and the society will remain standing, only
melanin-enriched but otherwise the same.
It's like white people all over the planet were each taking turns
shooting themselves in the head with the same gun, convinced when they
have all killed themselves they will leave the perfect society behind.
I've got bad news for you. What you think of as civilization is joined
at the hip with the Indo-European gene pool. It's not even like oil
and water because it's all an unbroken continuum.
Culture is gene expression. If enough Mexicans inhabit any area on the
planet, that area will look exactly like Mexico in short order.
There's no piece of land on Earth that has a special gas exuded by the
local soil that makes flush toilets, clean running water, air
conditioning and the rule of law. There's no geographic location that
has these properties inherently. Irregardless of whether they are
bright enough to see it and understand why, whites tend to terraform
their surroundings to reflect what is inside them. Everything they
take for granted as the human standard, is in fact a projection of
their own qualities out onto a world that by and large is completely
indifferent to them.
America has already slipped past the demographic failsafe point. There
ain't no going back. Just like the nation formerly known as Rhodesia,
you will hear all sorts of yammering and analysis and whining but
nothing can stop Rhodesia from becoming Zimbabwe once all the
Rhodesians leave. It's a done deal.
There's no legislation. There's no emergency action committee. There's
no orchestrated government reform program. There's no mission
statement. There's no declaration of goals or judicial decision. Once
you change the genetic composition of a country, that country will
come to reflect it's demographics, not the other way around.
I went to high school in Chicago. Trust me, thirty years ago it didn't
look like the background of that news report. That was back when
Chicago schools were the best in the country and had some of the
highest scholastic scores in the nation. Back then, next to nobody
dropped out, ever.
You can't keep the street lights working with only half a nation of
high school graduates. You can't find the manpower to keep the ATM
machines running, to keep the power plant maintained at the dam, to
keep the nuclear reactor running. You can't have good medical care
with no good doctors. You can't have bridges that don't collapse with
no engineers.
America is just like Rhodesia during desegregation. All those
Rhodesians who talked about the coming era of rainbow folk dancing and
singing hand-in-hand with their African friends playing little
ukeleles, where are they now? The wind howls. Tumbleweeds blow past.
Two rabid wild dogs fight over a human ribcage in the streets where
the electricity went off a decade ago and has never come back on.
Where are all those Rhodesians looking forward to an era of peace and
harmony now? Where are they? Answer me. Raped and left for dead.
They're all wormfood now. Their farms burned to the ground, their
children strangled, their wives gangraped and forced to run naked
screaming with burning tire necklaces.
Fools. Dust in the wind. Shot in the back of the head and left for the
buzzards in some ditch on the veldt long ago.
It doesn't matter if I'm the only human being out of six billion on
the planet who knows this. Irregardless of the forcible consensus,
this is the way it will come to pass. I will be demonstrated right and
they will turn out to have been catastrophically wrong. Wishing
otherwise never makes anything so.
In another ten years, Amerikwa will be utterly unrecognizable. I
predict that the first thing that will hit you no matter where you get
off a plane in that country will be the smell. Watch and see."
DonnaGiorno
Topaz
Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
this we have reason to believe that posterity will have a clearer
insight"
"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the
State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no
more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquility, so that
everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high
mission indeed to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity
which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth."
Michael Ejercito
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
Bill explains what nithings are.
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings
by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”
We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”
We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings
Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,
The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.
A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.
The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”
The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”
“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.
The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.
This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.
In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.
Michael Ejercito
> On 6/7/2011 2:05 PM, Topaz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:31:59 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
>
> >> is one race that much different than another race, or do all "people" want
> >> basically the same thing?
>
> > They might want basically the same thing, but Whites are on average
> > much more intelligent than Blacks.
>
> Irrelevant. You should evaluate an individual based on his own
> measurable and determinable attributes, not some average of an abstract
> group to which he belongs. There are literally millions of blacks who
> are more intelligent and/or far more accomplished than you.
is.
Michael
George Plimpton
That's false. You're as bad as he is.
Bob LeChevalier
>>is one race that much different than another race, or do all "people" want
>>basically the same thing?
>
>They might want basically the same thing, but Whites are on average
>much more intelligent than Blacks.
You are a counterexample
>>Is that because of where a person was born, or is that the result of a
>>government that is barely functioning?
>
>It's because of the race of most of the people in a country.
The race of everyone in the country is "human".
lojbab
---
Bob LeChevalier - artificial linguist; genealogist
loj...@lojban.org Lojban language www.lojban.org
Topaz
wrote:
>> They might want basically the same thing, but Whites are on average
>> much more intelligent than Blacks.
>
>Irrelevant.
There is a difference between Europe and Africa.
> You should evaluate an individual based on his own
>measurable and determinable attributes, not some average of an abstract
>group to which he belongs. There are literally millions of blacks who
>are more intelligent and/or far more accomplished than you.
You have your head up your aft end, figuratively speaking.
Topaz
Topaz
Here is part of David Duke's newsletter:
"Entering my old neighborhood of Gentilly Woods in New Orleans had
a profound effect upon me. My once tidy and well-kept neighborhood was
now mostly Black and disheveled. It once sported many homes that
seemed to always have a fresh-painted look. Now they were adorned with
peeling paint an unkempt lawns of weeds and trash. In talking to some
old holdouts in the neighborhood, they told me that the once rare
burglary, vandalism and assault had now become commonplace. The
diehard White remnants who remained had adapted to the changes and
found a way to endure each indignity and violation the best they
could. The change had been so gradual that they were no longer shocked
by new instances of crime, just resigned to them.
"The streets had scattered groups of hard-featured Black men
standing around dilapidated cars giving hostile stares to an obviously
unknown White person trespassing in their neighborhood.
"Even though it had been many years since my last visit, my
memories became more vivid as I entered the boundaries of the
neighborhood. It seemed as though I had only been away a few scant
hours. Now those memories crashed against the images of the present
causing me to feel off balance. It was akin to visiting a healthy
friend and then after a few short weeks to see him wasting away with
cancer. Afraid that perhaps me recollection was more idealized than it
really was--as soon as I returned home, I ferreted out my old
photographs.
"Those photos clearly portrayed a community even more attractive
than I had remembered. Well-kept homes filled the album, often
accented with blooming flowers and finely trimmed shrubbery, sidewalks
edged closely, and many homes had a fresh paint look. Polished autos
dotted the clean streets. Even more dramatic were the Tom Sawyer and
Becky Thatcher-like bright faces of the children with whom I spent so
many happy hours of childhood.
"In my time they were the ruddy faces that filled our streets
yards and parks. They were all gone now, replaced by dark, angry
teenagers, with scarred skin and boomboxes; often with pistols and
crack in their pockets, menacing the streets where children now fear
to venture. A picture repeated, I believe, all over the United States
of America. For the current White residents of Gentilly Woods their
story is much like the story fo the frog that is put in a pot of warm
water while the temperature is slowly increased until the poor
creature is boiling and it is too late to save itself. Is the
traditional American already too lulled by the tepid water to realize
what is ahead?
"Amercians can glimpse the future in the inner cities of
America. The political corruption, failing schools, drug problems,
crime, the run down housing and even the trash in the streets- all
hold a preview of the coming attractions of 21st century America. When
all of America is of the same racial proportion as that of the inner
cities, there will be no White infrastructure, and no white cornucopia
of tax revenue mitigating the Third Worldism. Criminals will no longer
be held in check by White police, prosecutors, juries and judges. The
shrinking White tax base will be inadequate to the costs of the
criminal justice system and jails needed to house lawbreakers. The
housing, food, medical care, and schooling of those who cannot provide
their own--will no longer be able to live off the support of the aging
and diminishing European population."
The address for this newsletter is David Duke Report, Box 88,
Covington, LA 70434
http://www.duke.org
Topaz
In the good old days a man could afford children and his wife didn't
have to work. The biggest problem in schools was gum chewing. But it
was more than that. It was the entire culture. Look in the old movies
and you can see it. Men were men. Women were women. And everybody was
White.
Look at America now. There are non-Whites everywhere. Anyone can
see Black neighborhoods and not safe and not where you want to live.
America is slowly turning into a third world country.
The National Socialists were fighting for the good old days. They
were fighting for civilization.
The Jews make the movies and control the media. Now you can hardly
go to the movies without seeing race-mixing and feminism. Hopefully
the world will not continue to go down the tubes forever. If we stop
the Jews from controlling the media and society we can be on the path
back to the good old days.
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."
Topaz
By Robert N. Proctor
The problem with the "science vs. fascism" thesis is that it fails to
take into account the eagerness with which many scientists and
physicians embraced the Reich, and the many scientific disciplines
which actually flourished under the Nazis. Anyone who has ever
examined
a V-2 engine will have few doubts about this, and there are numerous
other examples. During the Nazi era, German scientists and engineers
either developed or greatly improved television, jet-propelled
aircraft
(including the ejection seat), guided missiles, electronic computers,
the electron microscope, atomic fission, data-processing technologies,
The first magnetic tape recording was of a speech by Hitler,
The story of science under German fascism is not, as conventional
wisdom would have it, only a narrative of suppression and survival; a
truthful account will explain how and why Nazi ideology promoted
certain areas of inquiry, and how projects and policies were
championed or disappeared because of political considerations.
In this article, I want to explore some of the obstacles that have
hindered our efforts to understand Nazi science and medicine. I will
concentrate on two myths: the myth of flawed science and the myth of
abandoned ethics. The Nazis, I shall suggest, supported many kinds of
science, left politics (as we often think of it) out of most, and did
not abandon ethics. There was an ethics of Nazi medical practice-
sometimes explicit, sometimes not; often cruel, but sometimes not.
This
is important to understand if we are not to perceive the German
physicians who endorsed Nazism as absolutely alien and otherworldly
Nazi Ideology and Anti-Tobacco Research
If you ask most experts when the first good evidence arose that
tobacco was a major cause of lung cancer, they will point to a series
of epidemiological studies by English and American researchers in the
early 1950s. If you ask when a medical consensus on this question
first arose, they will most likely point to the 1964 Surgeon General's
report, which took a strong stand on this question, or a similar
report by Britain's Royal College of Physicians two years earlier.
I have become convinced, however, that there was an earlier and
overlooked consensus, a consensus within the German medical and
scientific community, that emerged during the Nazi period. The Nazis
had a powerful anti-tobacco movement, arguably the most powerful in
the world at that time. Tobacco was opposed by racial hygienists
fearing the corruption of the German "germ plasm" (i.e., genetic
material), by industrial hygienists fearing a reduction of people's
capacity to work, by nurses and midwives fearing harm to the "maternal
organism." Tobacco was said to be a "corrupting force in a rotting
civilization that has become lazy." The Nazis' anti-tobacco rhetoric
drew from an earlier generation's eugenics rhetoric and also reflected
an ethic of bodily purity and zeal for work.3 Tobacco use was attacked
as an "epidemic," a "plague," as "dry drunkenness," and as "lung
masturbation"; tobacco and alcohol abuses were "diseases of
civilization" and "relics of a liberal lifestyle."
Anti-tobacco research flourished in the Third Reich
Third Reich scientists also performed extensive work in the area of
occupational carcinogenesis. Physicians documented the health hazards
of asbestos, and in 1943 Germany became the first nation to recognize
lung cancer and mesothelioma caused by asbestos inhalation as
compensable occupational illnesses. Nazi Germany also pioneered what
we now call experimental epidemiology: two striking papers-a 1939
article by Franz H. Mueller of Cologne, and a 1943 paper by Eberhard
Schairer and Erich Schueniger of Jena-presented the most convincing
demonstrations up to that time that cigarettes were a major cause of
lung cancer. ..
How should we interpret such studies? How can we explain the fact that
Nazi Germany was home to the world's foremost tobacco-cancer
epidemiology and the world's strongest cancer prevention policy? Do we
say that "pockets of innovation" existed in Nazi Germany, resistant to
ideological influence?8 What if we find, on closer inspection, that
Germany's anti-tobacco research flourished not in spite of the Nazis,
but in large part because of the Nazis? And would it then be
appropriate, from a moral point of view, to cite such research in
scientific studies today?9
I ask this last question partly because the two tobacco studies I have
just discussed have, in fact, been repeatedly cited by postwar
scientific researchers, though rarely with any mention of the social
context within which they were carried out. There is never any
mention, for example, of the fact that the founding director of
Schueniger and Schairer's Institute was Karl Astel, Rector of the
University of Jena, a vicious racial hygienist, and an SS officer. One
never hears that the grant application for the Institute was written
by Gauleiter Fritz Sauckel, chief organizer of Germany's system of
forced labor and a man hanged after the war for crimes against
humanity (most leaders of Nazi Germany's anti-tobacco movement were
silenced in one way or another after 1945). No mention is ever made of
the fact that funding for Astel's Institute, and therefore for
Schairer and Sch=F6niger's study, came from a gift of 100,000
Reichsmarks from the Fuehrer-himself an ardent anti-smoking activist.
It is clear to anyone who follows the money trail and the research
interests that Schairer and Schueniger's study would not have been
undertaken had it not been for Hitler's anti-tobacco sentiments and
those of his like-minded underlings. Hitler once even attributed the
rise of German fascism to his quitting smoking: the young
artist-architect had smoked a couple of packs a day until 1919, when
he threw his cigarettes into the Danube and never reached for them
again.
Again, how should we interpret such Nazi-era papers? How should we
judge the fact that Nazi ideology in this case (and there are others)
appears not to have hindered research, but actually to have promoted
it?
I raise the questions I do about Nazism and science because it is poor
scholarship and perhaps even dangerous to caricature the Nazis as
irrational or anti-science. What we have to look at more carefully is
the relationship between science and ideology at this time. It is not
the case, for example, that the papers on tobacco epidemiology I have
mentioned were uninfluenced by Nazi ideology. The Reich's anti-tobacco
program was motivated by Nazi ideals of bodily purity and racial
hygiene: there was a kind of "homeopathic paranoia" pervading Nazi
ideology that led many of its adherents to believe that tiny,
corrosive
elements were insinuating themselves into "the German body," sapping
its strength, causing harm. Appreciating this helps us understand how
Nazi science/ideologues could declare that tobacco tar, lead, mercury,
asbestos-and Jews-all posed a threat to the Nordic race. It also
may help us better understand why so many doctors were supporters of
Hitler's regime.
Why were German doctors such avid fans of fascism?
Why did nearly half of all German physicians join the Nazi party?
I don't think it was the tirades of Julius Streicher in Der Stuermer
that attracted their interest, but rather the promises of Nazi leaders
to solve Germany's problems medically, surgically. The Nazi state was
supposed to be a hygienic state; Nazism was supposed to be "applied
biology" (Fritz Lenz coined this phrase in 1931). Hitler was
celebrated
as the "great doctor" of German society and as the "Robert Koch of
politics" (Koch was a nineteenth century pioneer in studying the
bacterial origin of diseases). The seductive power of National
Socialism for many physicians lay in its promise to cleanse German
society of its corrupting elements-not just communism and Jews, but
also metallic lead and addictive tobacco, along with homosexuality.
The relation of science and politics in Nazi Germany was therefore
more complex than most people like to think. Part of the
misunderstanding, I would suggest, lies in the widely accepted belief
that when science is politicized, "real" science inevitably suffers:
the freedom of scientists is abrogated, distorting biases are
introduced into research, minds are closed, avenues of inquiry are
blocked. In many areas of science, of course, that is indeed what
happened in Nazi Germany; one thinks of the fate of Einstein's
relativity theory, for example. But in other areas-e.g., many areas of
public health- that was not the case at all.
Biology was another field that thrived. Ute Deichmann in her book,
Biologists Under Hitler (Harvard University Press, 1996), shows that
the majority of biologists in the Thirties and early Forties joined
the Nazi party; but it was still quite possible for non-Nazi
biologists to obtain grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft,
Germany's leading scientific grant agency. Not only possible but easy:
Deichmann discovered that there was no correlation at all between a
researcher receiving a grant and whether that researcher belonged to
the Nazi party. I would argue that biology prospered under the Nazis
because it was so integral to their worldview. Apart from the reasons
I have already discussed, there is the fact that Nazism placed a much
higher value on nature than on nurture in the development of human
talents and disabilities.
I am not sure I would agree with Deichmann that scientists in the
Third Reich were more independent of the regime than we usually think.
Independent research flourished in many fields but it was, after all,
also in the Nazi state's interest to cultivate a strong scientific
community, at least in certain disciplines. What is clearly wrong
about
the autonomy thesis, applied to science and medicine as a whole, is
that many professionals did not retreat into the purely technical. It
took a lot of medical enthusiasm to forcibly sterilize 350,000
Germans,
There is nothing inherently evil about physicians working and
cooperating with their government. The moral failure of the German
medical profession was its willingness to collaborate with the Nazi
state, its willingness to serve Nazi values. There is nothing wrong
with physicians working to preserve the health of a larger community;
that, after all, is the essence of responsible public health. What
differentiated National Socialist public health from genuine public
health in a reasonably civilized society was the exclusive nature of
what the Nazis considered "the community." Nazi values excluded Jews
and others deemed racially or genetically unfit from the volkisch
community...
It is just as misguided to believe that scientists who cooperated with
the Nazis were bereft of ethics as to believe the Nazis were
intrinsically hostile to science. There was an ethic of Nazi medical
practice, and it should be examined and understood.
It might be hard to believe, but there were, in fact, ethical
standards that governed medical research and the practice of medicine
in the Third Reich. Medical students took courses on medical ethics;
medical textbooks in Nazi Germany discussed medical ethics. There was
a great deal of attention given to the obligations of physicians to
society, the state, and sometimes even to the individual. Nazi medical
philosophers were critical of the ideal of value-free science, which
was often equated with useless ivory-tower liberal-or Jewish-
"science for its own sake." Science was supposed to be "for the
people," though not of course for all people: Science was supposed to
be at the service of the German Volk, the healthy and productive white
races of Europe. Nazi medical ethics was underpinned by sexist
paternalism, Nordic supremacy, cleanliness, punctuality, orderliness,
unquestioned obedience to authority, and public and environmental
health. It tended to emphasize preventive medicine, cost efficiency,
the natural lifestyle, and the superiority of the productive worker.
Clearly, Nazi medicine was imbued with ethical principles ..
One sees evidence of these principles in Nazi public health practice.
Nazi health officials cleaned up water supplies and removed lead and
mercury from consumer products. Doctors were urged to counsel patients
against tobacco use, to maintain the efficiency of workers, safeguard
public and genetic health, and ensure the best possible medical care
for every pregnant woman and newborns judged "genetically fit." There
were debates about medical malpractice-whether, for example, natural
healers were to be barred from treating cancer patients (they
eventually were) -- and the limits of medical confidentiality and
medical disclosure. A 1943 article in a leading German cancer journal
cited the "demands of medical ethics" to inform patients of the
severity of their diseases, and in at least one case a physician was
prosecuted for failing to inform a woman she had cancer (physicians
protested the ruling in print).
The Nazi doctors were not madmen; that is why we must work so hard to
understand the origins of Nazism if we are to have any success in
preventing its resurgence.
Robert N. Proctor is professor of the history of science at
Pennsylvania State University.
George Plimpton
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:57:30 -0700, George Plimpton<geo...@si.not>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>> They might want basically the same thing, but Whites are on average
>>> much more intelligent than Blacks.
>>
>> Irrelevant.
>
> There is a difference between Europe and Africa.
Not the one you imagine.
>> You should evaluate an individual based on his own
>> measurable and determinable attributes, not some average of an abstract
>> group to which he belongs. There are literally millions of blacks who
>> are more intelligent and/or far more accomplished than you.
>
> You have your head up your aft end, figuratively speaking.
No, I do not. You have completely baseless ideas in your head,
literally speaking. Your notions of racial superiority and racial
purity are hogwash - unscientific garbage.
Topaz
wrote:
Carleton S. Coon, who was Professor of Anthropology at Harvard and at
the University Museum in Philadelphia, and President of the American
Association of Physical Anthropology wrote:
"More serious are the activities of the academic debunkers and
soft-pedalers who operate inside anthropology itself. Basing their
ideas on the brotherhood of man, certain writers, who are mostly
social anthropologists, consider it immoral to study race, and produce
book after book exposing it as a 'myth'. Their argument is that
because the study of race once gave ammunition to racial fascists, we
should pretend that races do not exist... These writers are not
physical anthropologists, but the public does not know the
difference."
"I knew Franz Boas personally. I was able to observe his influence
as founder of the science of anthropology in America. I was able to
observe the increasing degree of control exercised by the [Boas] cult
over students and younger professors until fear of loss of jobs and
status became common in the field of anthropology unless conformity to
racial equality dogma was maintained. I can testify from repeated
personal observation to the intimidation and the pall of suppression
that has fallen upon the academic world of which I speak. It
encompasses not only anthropology but certain related sciences."
George Plimpton
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:00:42 -0700, George Plimpton<geo...@si.not>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>> They might want basically the same thing, but Whites are on average
>>>>> much more intelligent than Blacks.
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>
>>> There is a difference between Europe and Africa.
>>
>> Not the one you imagine.
>>
>>
>>>> You should evaluate an individual based on his own
>>>> measurable and determinable attributes, not some average of an abstract
>>>> group to which he belongs. There are literally millions of blacks who
>>>> are more intelligent and/or far more accomplished than you.
>>>
>>> You have your head up your aft end, figuratively speaking.
>>
>> No, I do not. You have completely baseless ideas in your head,
>> literally speaking. Your notions of racial superiority and racial
>> purity are hogwash - unscientific garbage.
>
Bob LeChevalier
>On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:57:30 -0700, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not>
>wrote:
>
>>> They might want basically the same thing, but Whites are on average
>>> much more intelligent than Blacks.
>>
>>Irrelevant.
>
>There is a difference between Europe and Africa.
Not a relevant one.
Topaz
wrote:
>Your notions of racial superiority and racial purity are hogwash -
>unscientific garbage.
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Topaz
<loj...@lojban.org> wrote:
>>
>>There is a difference between Europe and Africa.
>
>Not a relevant one.
You say there is no relevant difference between Europe and Africa! How
about Iceland and Haiti.
"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
the Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/
Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.
He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.
He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the
Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech
and hear it for yourself.."
Tommy
George Plimpton
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:15:59 -0700, George Plimpton<geo...@si.not>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Your notions of racial superiority and racial purity are hogwash -
>> unscientific garbage.
>
>
Your notions about race are unscientific garbage - total bullshit.
Paul Hovnanian P.E.
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:19:07 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
> <loj...@lojban.org> wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>>There is a difference between Europe and Africa.
>>
>>Not a relevant one.
>
> You say there is no relevant difference between Europe and Africa! How
> about Iceland and Haiti.
>
>
> "I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
> the Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/
>
> Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.
>
> He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
> crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
>
> He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
> great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
> world. etc, etc.
Actually, Duke is misinformed. Haiti has been severely deforested and
agriculturally mismanaged (noteably during the US occupation and subsequent
governance by puppet administrations). Take a look at satellite photos of
Haiti and the Dominican Republic. The difference is quite evident.
> He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
> Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
>
> Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
> generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
If we took all of the colonial property owners in Haiti, marched them out
into a field and put a bullet in each one's head, it would improve
immensely.
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Pa...@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
I had a dog that would chase anyone riding a bicycle.
In the end I had to take his bicycle away.
Bob LeChevalier
>On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:19:07 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
><loj...@lojban.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>There is a difference between Europe and Africa.
>>
>>Not a relevant one.
>
>You say there is no relevant difference between Europe and Africa! How
>about Iceland and Haiti.
No relevant difference.
All are inhabited by human beings.
Topaz
The reason America is rich is because it was made by White people. The
former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
world on the Whites. The real reason Black countries are the third
world is that Blacks are on average much less intelligent than Whites
as all IQ tests have proven.
In the past White people built colonies in Africa and brought
civilization there. The Blacks were much better off with schools and
hospitals and a lot of food. They were exporting food. But the
liberals didn't like White people being in charge so they put a stop
to the colonies. And they brought the starvation and misery back to
Africa.
The liberal plan of just giving food to the Blacks also causes more
suffering. It always causes them to greatly increase their population
and then there are a lot more people starving and needing even more
food.
Since the Liberals didn't like the colonies because Whites were
running them, I propose that American Blacks be sent there. Many
American Blacks are not very dark and have a lot of White blood in
them and they are more intelligent than the African Blacks. They could
teach the Africans how to farm and educate them in many other ways.
With the proper leadership the starvation in Africa could be stopped.
Topaz
<loj...@lojban.org> wrote:
>>
>>You say there is no relevant difference between Europe and Africa! How
>>about Iceland and Haiti.
>
>No relevant difference.
>
>All are inhabited by human beings.
>
"Weep you mothers, whose children will inherit the diverse and
fractured country of America. Do you think that America will be great
once Whites have been displaced, as they have already been
dispossessed? You know better! You know that when you drive through
areas, even at midday, that have already been purged of Whites, you do
not feel safe. Your most feared nightmare is to have your car break
down in one of those areas at night. There is no amount of money that
you would be willing to accept in payment for moving your family into
one of those areas. You say, "Why can't we all just get along?" But
you know in your heart of hearts that we cannot, and we never will.
As you cry for the lost security you have been forced to finally face
up to with the destruction of the World Trade Center, try at the same
time to understand that the foundation for this loss was laid through
the planning, and execution of those plans, occuring within our own
country.
It was the policies of "our" government that supplied these
perpetrators the opportunity to commit the act. They were allowed by
our open borders policy to not only enter this country unhindered, but
to live here as if they belonged.
It was the policies of "our" government that provided the perpetrators
with the motive for the horrendous event that we have all had our
hearts torn over. The people in our government have taken the cause
and the will of the Israeli nation as the cause and the will of the
American nation. We have bombed Israel's enemies, not because they
were our enemies, or because they posed any sort of threat to us, but
simply because it was in Israel's best interest. We have killed nearly
a million Iraqis, in order to further Israel's aims. The total number
of all American soldiers who have ever been killed, in all of our wars
combined, is about a million. We have killed soldiers, women and
children in Iraq in the hundreds of thousands. Why have we done this?
Because it HELPED ISRAEL, not because it helped America. What would
you be willing to do if another nation had bombed and starved your own
children in those kinds of numbers? (Just think what are you willing
to do for having perhaps 5,000 of your people killed on September
11th?) That is what is called motive.
The part that the government is today focusing on the most, is the
weapon. It is the least important part of the equation. If friendly,
and caring people all are wearing guns, we will be safe, even if
completely surrounded by them. However, bare hands will be enough to
end our lives, if we are surrounded by those that hate us. One who is
set upon revenge will always find a weapon.
Societies tend to end up generally in the model of either one or the
other of two possible arrangements: a free country populated by
law-abiding citizens; or a police state that watches each and every
move its controlled and unhappy citizens make.
Our own society was much freer in the 1950s than it is today. It could
afford to be. It was nearly all White, and the citizens nearly all
came from a similar background, and lived by the same ethical
standard. The ones who were not willing to live by that standard were
either ostracized from society, or they were locked up if they broke
the law. The security that was everywhere felt in America then was
infinitely stronger than what is felt today in America. Why? Because
Americans looked alike, thought alike, and were interested in
cooperating in maintaining a safe and prosperous society.
We have been moving rapidly away from a free society towards a police
state, as our actions have become more and more restricted. We can no
longer freely choose who we will hire or fire in our businesses. We
can no longer choose who we are going to live next to, or who our
children will attend school with. We are evermore rigidly controlled
in what we can say, do, and even think. Our children are programmed by
the state to accept concepts that were not approved by the parents,
and now we have young adults who have literally been brainwashed into
thinking that having a society like the White one in the 1950s is
somehow evil. They have been taught that the diverse struggling mess
we have created on our soil today is somehow superior to the White
nation of America that existed when I was a child. That is not
freedom. That is the type of thing that everyone used to condemn the
Soviet Union for. Brainwashing children, against what the parents want
their children to be taught is totalitarianism at its worse, because
it will destroy the roots, and heritage of an entire society, just
like it is doing to America right now. The one thing that could save
us is being programmed right out of our children: pride in who they
are.
Now that the policies of "our" government have created enthusiastic
enemies for our nation, and given those enemies the opportunity to
commit destructive and lethal acts upon our citizens, that same
government continues to perform acts that will increase the enthusiasm
of our enemies for our destruction, and is doing nothing that will
prevent those enemies from coming to our land. It instead is working
towards eliminating more of our freedom, and trying to control
weapons, neither of which will protect us from those who desire so
strongly to kill us, but both of which will make our lives more
miserable.
So, weep mothers of America, the evil is not only continuing, it going
to grow. We are going to lose more of our children and more of our
loved ones, because of what our government is doing. Each day that
passes, the White backbone of America grows smaller, and is displaced
by the non-White invaders an additional amount, adding up to millions
every year.
No one seems to be thinking about the fact that you do not mix clay
and grass in with your concrete when you are laying the foundation of
your house. The foundation of the United States of America has always
been the White people who founded her. It is pure insanity to think
that mixing in other peoples into our society will allow the
foundation to remain as strong as it was before. Plain common sense
told many this fact, before we started changing our land in the 1960s.
Many spoke out against the policies that have since proved to be so
destructive. Today, anyone who would dare to speak out, saying the
very mainstream things that many of our leaders said in the 1950s or
early 1960s said, would be instantly branded a racist and a hater.
Why? Because the people who have been behind this entire process know
that the only hope White America has of ever recovering its strength
and its security, is to return to its all-White composition. That can
never happen as long as those in power have the weapon of smearing
anyone speaking the truth, with the dreaded "racist" label, and while
White Americans are more terrified of being called a "racist" than
they are of having their daughters raped and their sons murdered.
I am completely amazed by people who still email me, calling me a
racist. Do they actually think that is something I am ashamed of?
Obviously they do. They cannot even see the words on my web page! They
only know that what is being said goes against their brainwashing, and
therefore it must be wrong. The very idea that a group of people, who
can control what is being thought by the average citizen in this
fashion, just might not have the welfare of the average White American
at heart, never even enters their mind for a second before it is
rejected. It does not even cross the threshold of their understanding.
They take their propaganda programming as pure truth, and gauge
everything else from it.
Yes, I am a racist, and naturally, so is every other human on earth.
It is clear from simple observation. We see men who are non-White,
applauded in the media for standing up for the needs and wants of
their own races. What is a Black leader other than a pure racist? He
is concerned with the welfare of his own race, over and above all
others. People know this is natural and good. Each race must stand up
for itself if it is to survive.
It has taken a huge amount of propaganda to destroy that natural
tendency in White Americans. Every day you see posters, and
advertisements laden with the propaganda message that diversity is
wonderful. Why is that propaganda necessary? Obviously, it is a
message that does not come naturally to people. It is a concept that
is abnormal, and must therefore be continually forced upon people who
would otherwise think of diversity as it truly is: death to any
society that embraces it. It is in order to kill that natural tendency
to want to live and work with those of your own kind, that the daily
propaganda barrage continues. The poster pictures of White and
non-White hands clasped, push the lie. The billboard photos of happy
people in a group, each of whom is a member of a different race, or a
mixture of races, force the idea home. The slogans telling you to
celebrate the cancer of diversity would hardly be needed if it were
really worthy of celebration.
And while this overwhelming flood of propaganda filth floods our
lives, at the same time, any attempt to run against the current of the
propaganda is attacked aggressively. The natural racist tendencies of
non-Whites are promoted as healthy, and all are demanded to accept
them, and even celebrate them. The natural racist tendencies of
Whites, are called hate, and continually condemned through every media
outlet in existence. This hypocritical, inconsistency slaps the numbed
White Americans every day squarely across the face. But it has been
going on for so long, they think that insult to their intelligence is
perfectly normal. They even join in! They write emails to me calling
me a "RACIST," without realizing that by doing so, they are saying
that I am a healthy White American who is proud of his race and wants
it to continue to exist, and to rule the country it created. They are
so far gone that they don't realized what they are saying. They really
think that giving up their lives, their children, their future, and
their nation to other people is "healthy" and "caring," while fighting
to save your people and your nation is "sick" and "heartless."
I feel sorry for these people. It is very sad that such mind
manipulation could go on for so long in a country as rich and powerful
as this country is. To have this many White Americans be this
confused, after a few decades of mental manipulation, is a frightening
thing to behold. These are the ones who have to one day awaken, or we
will sink into third world suicide.
Mothers of America, cry for your children, for they are doomed by your
own actions. Cry for your nation, that is rotting from the inside out,
because of your attitudes. Cry for daughters and sisters, as they are
being tormented by rape at a rate of 20,000 each year by the
non-Whites in our lands. Cry for the squalor that awaits your
grandchildren and the extinction that awaits theirs. If you do not
change what you are doing, all that will be left to you is to weep, as
all that is dear to you as an American is taken from your unresisting
hands."
Geopelia
"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gr4tu69739h0jtnc9...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:28:38 -0700, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>>> Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>>>> States?
>>>
>>> Portugal
>>
>>That's false, of course - both in terms of absolute numbers and
>>percentage of the population.
>
> Which has more blonds, Portugal of the United States?
>
>>
>>thoroughly discredited and repudiated long ago.
>
>
> they were outnumbered. Compare the size of Germany to the size of the
> Jewish controlled countries, the USA and the USSR. Hitler made Germany
> great. Of course the Jew parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately
> the bad side won the war.
>
> An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
> The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
> by Joseph Goebbels
(Snipped)
How on earth could an intelligent people like the Germans be taken in by the
ravings of Hitler and Goebbels?
One of the mysteries of the Twentieth Century.
Topaz
Here are parts of a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, delivered in
Nuernberg in 1934. The ending of this speech is in the film Triumph of
the Will.
"It is difficult to define the concept of propaganda thoroughly and
precisely. This is especially true since in past decades it was
subject to unfavorable definitions, particularly as the enemy defined
it with regards to us Germans. First, then, we must defend it. Those
abroad sometimes claim that in the past we Germans were particularly
good in this area, but that unfortunately is not consistent with the
facts. We learned this all too clearly during the World War. While the
enemy states produced unprecedented atrocity propaganda aimed at
Germany throughout the whole world, we did nothing and were completely
defenseless against it. Only when enemy foreign propaganda had nearly
won over the greater part of the neutral states did the German
government begin to sense the enormous power of propaganda. It was too
late. Just as we were militarily and economically unprepared for the
war, so too with propaganda. We lost the war in this area more than in
any other.
The cleverest trick used in propaganda against Germany during the war
was to accuse Germany of what our enemies themselves were doing. Even
today large parts of world opinion are convinced that the typical
characteristics of German propaganda are lying, crudeness, reversing
the facts and the like. One needs only to remember the stories that
were spread throughout the world at the beginning of the war about
German soldiers chopping off children's hands and crucifying women to
realize that Germany then was a defenseless victim of this campaign of
calumny. It neither had nor used any means of defense.
The concept of propaganda has undergone a fundamental transformation,
particularly as the result of political practice in Germany.
Throughout the world today, people are beginning to see that a modern
state, whether democratic or authoritarian, cannot withstand the
subterranean forces of anarchy and chaos without propaganda. It is not
only a matter of doing the right thing; the people must understand
that the right thing is the right thing. Propaganda includes
everything that helps the people to realize this.
Political propaganda in principle is active and revolutionary. It is
aimed at the broad masses. It speaks the language of the people
because it wants to be understood by the people. Its task is the
highest creative art of putting sometimes complicated events and facts
in a way simple enough to be understood by the man on the street. Its
foundation is that there is nothing the people cannot understand,
rather things must be put in a way that they can understand. It is a
question of making it clear to him by using the proper approach,
evidence and language.
Propaganda is a means to an end. Its purpose is to lead the people to
an understanding that will allow them to willingly and without
internal resistance devote themselves to the tasks and goals of a
superior leadership. If propaganda is to succeed, it must know what it
wants. It must keep a clear and firm goal in mind, and seek the
appropriate means and methods to reach that goal. Propaganda as such
is neither good nor evil. Its moral value is determined by the goals
it seeks."
"Each propaganda had a direction. The quality of this direction
determines whether propaganda has a positive or negative effect. Good
propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no
reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people
cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the
truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A
propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be
successful in the long run. A good propaganda will always come along
that serves a good cause. But propaganda is still necessary if a good
cause is to succeed. A good idea does not win simply because it is
good. It must be presented properly if it is to win. But a good idea
is itself the best propaganda. Such propaganda is successful without
being obnoxious. It depends on its nature, not its methods. It works
without being noticed. Its goals are inherent in its nature. Since it
is almost invisible, it is effective and powerful. A good cause will
lose to a bad one if it depends only on its rightness, while the other
side uses the methods of influencing the masses. We are for example
convinced that we fought the war for a good cause, but that was not
enough. The world should also have known that our cause was good.
However, we lacked the effective means of mass propaganda to make that
clear to the world. Marxism certainly did not fight for great ideals.
Despite that, in November 1918 it overcame Kaiser, Reich and the army
because it was superior in the art of mass propaganda.
National Socialism learned from these two examples. It drew the
correct practical conclusions from that knowledge. The ideal of a
socialist national community did not remain mere theory with us, but
became living reality in the thoughts and feelings of 67 million
Germans. Our propaganda of word and deed created the conditions for
that. Mastering them kept National Socialism from the danger of
remaining the dream and longing of a few thousand. Through propaganda,
it became hard, steely everyday reality."
"Marxism could not be eliminated by a government decision. Its
elimination was the end result of a process that began in the people.
But that was only possible because our propaganda had shown people
that Marxism was a danger to both the state and society. The positive
national discipline of the German press would never have been possible
without the compete elimination of the influence of the liberal-Jewish
press. That happened only because of the years-long work of our
propaganda. Today particularism in Germany is something of the past.
The fact that it was eliminated by a strong central idea of the Reich
is no accident, rather depended on psychological foundations that were
established by our propaganda.
Or consider economic policy. Does anyone believe that the idea of
class struggle could have been eliminated only by a law? Is it not
rather the fact that the seeds we sowed in a hundred thousand meetings
resulted in a new socialist structure of labor? Today employers and
workers stand together in the Labor Front. The Law on National Labor
is the foundation of our economic thinking, realizing itself more and
more. Are not these social achievements the result of the long and
tireless labor of thousands of speakers?"
"We could eliminate the Jewish danger in our culture because the
people had recognized it as the result of our propaganda. Major
cultural achievements such as the unique "Kraft durch Freude" are
possible only with the powerful support of the people. The
prerequisite was and is propaganda, which here too creates and
maintains the connection to the people.
The Winter Relief last year raised about 350 million Marks. This was
not the result of taxation, rather many gifts of every amount.
Everyone gave freely and gladly, many of whom in the past had done
nothing in the face of similar need. Why? Because a broad propaganda
using every modern means presented the whole nation with the need of
this program of social assistance.
45 million Reich Marks of goods and services were provided. 85 million
Reich Marks worth of fuel were distributed. 130 million Reich Marks
worth of food were given out. Ten million Reich Marks worth of meals
were provided, and 70 million Reich Marks worth of clothing.
Some of these achievements were the result of donations in kind,
others the result of cash donations. Street collections, donations of
a part of paychecks, contributions from companies, and gifts
subtracted from bank accounts resulted in cash totaling 184 million
Reich Marks. 24 million marks alone were the result of "One Dish
Sundays." The Reich itself added 15 million marks to the
contributions of the people. The railway system provided reduced or
free shipping with a value of 14 million Marks.
Of our population of 65,595,000, 16,511,00 were assisted by the Winter
Relief. There were 150,000 volunteers. There were only 4,474 paid
workers, of whom 4,144 were in the 34 Gaue and 330 in the Reich
headquarters.
Propaganda and education prepared the way for the largest social
assistance program in history. They were the foundation. Their success
was that, over a long winter, no one in Germany went hungry or was
cold.
Over 40 million people approved of the Fuehrer's decision to leave the
League of Nations on 12 November 1933. That gave him the ability to
speak to the world in the name of the nation, defending honor, peace
and equality as the national ideals of the German people. The issues
of disarmament were put on firm and clear foundations. Once again,
propaganda was the foundation for the nation's unity on 12 November,
and therefore of the freedom of action that the Fuehrer had.
Each situation brings new challenges. And each task requires the
support of the people, which can only be gained by untiring propaganda
that brings the broad masses knowledge and clarity. No area of public
life can do without it. It is the never resting force behind public
opinion. It must maintain an unbroken relationship between leadership
and people. Every means of technology must be put in its service; the
goal is to form the mass will and to give it meaning, purpose and
goals that will enable us to learn from past failures and mistakes and
ensure that the lead National Socialist strength has given us over
other nations will never again be lost.
May the bright flame of our enthusiasm never fade. It alone gives
light and warmth to the creative art of modern political propaganda.
Its roots are in the people. The movement gives it direction and
drive. The state can only provide it with the new, wide-ranging
technical means. Only a living relationship between people, movement
and state can guarantee that the creative art of propaganda, which we
have made ourselves the world's master, will never sink into
bureaucracy and official narrow-mindedness.
Creative people made it and put it in the service of our movement. We
must have creative people who can use the means of the state in its
service.
It is also a function of the modern state. Its reach is the firm
ground on which it must stand. It rises from the depths of the people,
and must always return to the people to find its roots and strength.
It may be good to have power based on weapons. It is better and longer
lasting, however, to win and hold the heart of a nation."
George Plimpton
erudition he doesn't really have:
>
> Here is some thoroughgoing bullshit by Dr. Joseph Goebbels,
Not interested. No basically decent person is.
"Dr." Goebbels received his Ph.D. in 18th century romantic drama. That
in no way makes him qualified to blabber authoritatively on race.
It is ignorant to say anything about a bullshit speech by "Dr." Joseph
Goebbels. Doctor should be used only when addressing someone with the
title: "How many Jews did you murder in 1943, Dr. Goebbels?" When
referring to him as you have done, you should say "thoroughgoing
bullshit by Joseph Goebbels, Ph.D."
Topaz
England's Guilt
by Joseph Goebbels
It is a major error to assume that England's plutocrats slipped into
the war against their will or even against their intentions. The
opposite is true. The English warmongers wanted the war and used all
the resources at their disposal over the years to bring it about. They
surely were not surprised by the war. English plutocracy had no goal
other than to unleash war against Germany at the right moment, and
this since Germany first began to seek once again to be a world power.
Poland really had little to do with the outbreak of war between the
Reich and England. It was only a means to an end. England did not
support the Polish government out of principle or for humanitarian
reasons. That is clear from the fact that England gave Poland no help
of any kind whatsoever when the war began. Nor did England take any
measures against Russia. The opposite, in fact. The London warring
clique to this day has tried to bring Russia into the campaign of
aggression against Germany.
The encirclement of Germany long before the outbreak of the war was
traditional English policy. From the beginning, England has always
directed its main military might against Germany. It never could
tolerate a strong Reich on the Continent. It justified its policy by
claiming that it wanted to maintain a balance of forces in Europe.
Today there is still another reason. The English warmongers conceal
it. It is crassly egotistic. The English prime minister announced the
day the war began that England's goal was to destroy Hitlerism.
However, he defined Hitlerism in a way other than how the English
plutocracy actually sees it. The English warmongers claim that
National Socialism wants to conquer the world. No nation is secure
against German aggression. An end must be made of the German hunger
for power. The limit came in the conflict with Poland. In reality,
however, there is another reason for England's war with Germany. The
English warmongers cannot seriously claim that Germany wants to
conquer the world, particularly in view of the fact that England
controls nearly two thirds of the world. And Germany since 1933 has
never threatened English interests.
So when Chamberlain says that England wants to destroy Hitlerism in
this war, he is in one sense incorrect. But in another sense, he is
speaking the truth. England does want to destroy Hitlerism. It sees
Hitlerism as the present internal state of the Reich, which is a thorn
in the eye of English plutocracy.
England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people's
state. And it is not the case that we think England is the richest
land on earth. There are lords and City men in England who are in fact
the richest men on earth. The broad masses, however, see little of
this wealth. We see in England an army of millions of impoverished,
socially enslaved and oppressed people. Child labor is still a matter
of course there. They have only heard about social welfare programs.
Parliament occasionally discusses social legislation. Nowhere else is
there such terrible and horrifying inequality as in the English slums.
Those with good breeding take no notice of it. Should anyone speak of
it in public, the press, which serves plutocratic democracy, quickly
brands him the worst kind of rascal. They do not hesitate from making
major changes in the Constitution if they are necessary to preserve
capitalist democracy.
Capitalism democracy suffers from every possible modern social
ailment. The Lords and City people can remain the richest people one
earth only because they constantly maintain their wealth by exploiting
their colonies and preserving unbelievable poverty in their own
country.
Germany, on the other hand, has based its domestic policies on new and
modern social principles. That is why it is a danger to English
plutocracy. It is also why English capitalists want to destroy
Hitlerism. They see Hitlerism as all the generous social reforms that
have occurred in Germany since 1933. The English plutocrats rightly
fear that good things are contagious, that they could endanger English
capitalism.
That is why England declared war on Germany. Since it was accustomed
to letting others fight its wars, it looked to the European continent
to find those ready to fight for England's interests. France was ready
to take on this degrading duty, since the same kind of people ruled
France. They too were ready for war out of egotistic reasons. Western
European democracy is really only a Western European plutocracy that
rules the world. It declared war on German socialism because it
endangered their capitalist interests.
A similar drama began in 1914. England had more luck during those four
and a half years than it is having today. Europe's nations had no
chance to see what was happening. The nations of Europe today have no
desire to play the same role they played during the World War. England
and France stand alone. Still, England is trying once again to wage
war without making any personal sacrifice. The goal is to blockade
Germany, to gradually bring it to submit by starvation. That is
longstanding English policy. They used it successfully in the
Napoleonic wars, and also during the World War. It would work now as
well, if the German people had not been educated by National
Socialism. National Socialism is immune to English temptations.
English propaganda lies no longer work in Germany. They have gradually
lost their effectiveness in the rest of the world as well, since
German propaganda today reaches far beyond its borders. This time,
English plutocracy will not succeed in driving a wedge between the
German people and their leadership, though that is their goal.
The German nation today is defending not only its honor and
independence, but also the great social accomplishments it has made
through hard and untiring work since 1933. It is a people's state
built on the foundation of justice and economic good sense. In the
past, England always had the advantage of facing a fragmented Germany.
It is only natural that English plutocracy today seeks to split the
German people and make it ripe for new collapse.
English lying propaganda can no longer name things by their proper
names. It therefore claims that it is not fighting the German people,
only Hitlerism. But we know this old song. In South Africa, England
was not fighting the Boers, only Krugerism. In the World War, England
wanted to destroy Kaiserism, not the German people. But that did not
stop English plutocracy from brutally and relentlessly suppressing the
Boers after that war or the Germans after our defeat.
A child once burned is twice shy. The German people were once victims
of lying English war propaganda. Now it understands the situation. It
has long understood the background of this war. It knows that behind
all English plutocratic capitalism's fine words, its aim is to destroy
Germany's social achievements. We are defending the socialism we have
build in Germany since 1933 with every military, economic and
spiritual means at our disposal. The bald English lies have no impact
on the German people.
English plutocracy is finally being forced to defend itself. In the
past, it always found other nations to fight for it. This time, the
English people must themselves risk their necks for the lords and City
men. They will meet a unified German people of workers, farmers and
soldiers who are prepared to defend their nation with every means at
their disposal.
We did not want war. England inflicted it on us. English plutocracy
forced it on us. England is responsible for the war, and it will have
to pay for it.
The whole world is waking up today. It can no longer be ruled by the
capitalist methods of the 19th Century. The peoples have matured. They
will one day deal a terrible blow to the capitalist plutocrats who are
the cause of their misery.
It is no accident that National Socialism has the historical task of
carrying out this reckoning. Plutocracy is collapsing intellectually,
spiritually, and in the not too distant future, militarily. We are
acting consistently with Nietzsche's words: "Give a shove to what is
falling."
Geopelia
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:29:00 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
> <okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Topaz" wrote in message
>>news:h36qu6pbg33eeoscs...@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:40:08 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
>><okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>>>States?
>>
>>Portugal
>>
>>
>>
>
> In race mixing the blonds are the first to go. They don't have a lot
> of blonds in Portugal.
The blond genes are recessive. It is not just racial mixing that brings
fewer natural blonds.
In England, when country people married mates from their own or neighbouring
villages, blonds of Saxon descent usually married others. With the movement
to cities, they had a much wider choice of mate.
It will be interesting to see what happens as African genes from the West
Indian immigration of the fifties spread through the population.
Geopelia
"Mr. Smartypants" <bc...@canada.con> wrote in message
news:ppidnbP4vb9Dz3DQ...@giganews.com...
> On 6/6/2011 3:16 PM, americanpatriot213 wrote:
>> Of course,everyone's Souls are the same color. Jesus Christ didn't
>> die just for caucasians (which would be odd since Christ was not even
>> European, but middle-eastern).
>
> Jesus Christ was a black African.
He was a Jew.
Bob LeChevalier
>On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:29:00 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
><okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Topaz" wrote in message news:h36qu6pbg33eeoscs...@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:40:08 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
>><okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>>>States?
>>
>>Portugal
>>
>>Some data to support that statement would be nice.
>
>In race mixing the blonds are the first to go. They don't have a lot
>of blonds in Portugal.
Recent DNA research has shown that Europeans have around 3%
Neanderthal DNA. Africans on the other hand do not.
Thus it must be concluded that Nazis, who invariably consider
themselves "European", are ALL mixed race, or actually mixed species,
and not pure homo sapiens And it must be assumed that EVERYONE in
Portugal is of such mixed ancestry, and that this was true when
Portugal was first invented as well.
Ray Fischer
> Topaz<mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:29:00 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
>> <okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Topaz" wrote in message news:h36qu6pbg33eeoscs...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:40:08 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
>>> <okamu...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which country has more people of mixed races....Portugal or the United
>>>> States?
>>>
>>> Portugal
>>>
>>> Some data to support that statement would be nice.
>>
>> In race mixing the blonds are the first to go. They don't have a lot
>> of blonds in Portugal.
>
> Recent DNA research has shown that Europeans have around 3%
> Neanderthal DNA. Africans on the other hand do not.
>
> Thus it must be concluded that Nazis, who invariably consider
> themselves "European", are ALL mixed race, or actually mixed species,
> and not pure homo sapiens And it must be assumed that EVERYONE in
> Portugal is of such mixed ancestry, and that this was true when
> Portugal was first invented as well.
You're a Nazi turd.
--
Ray Fischer | Mendacrusy (n.) government by lying
rfis...@sonic.net | The new GOP ideal
Bob LeChevalier
Topaz is. Not me.
Topaz
wrote:
>> In race mixing the blonds are the first to go. They don't have a lot
>> of blonds in Portugal.
>
>The blond genes are recessive. It is not just racial mixing that brings
>fewer natural blonds.
>In England, when country people married mates from their own or neighbouring
>villages, blonds of Saxon descent usually married others. With the movement
>to cities, they had a much wider choice of mate.
>
>It will be interesting to see what happens as African genes from the West
>Indian immigration of the fifties spread through the population.
>
"Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE
problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the
third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white
countries."
"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan,
but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by
bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote
with them."
"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY
white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e.,
intermarry, with all those non-whites."
"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem
would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were
brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"
"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a
RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK
problem?"
"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and
what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"
"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of
genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable
conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/
Topaz
http://www.rense.com/general77/racedif.htm
Race Differences In Average IQ Are Mostly Genetic, Not Cultural
Medical Research News
A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on
state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has
concluded that race differences in average IQ are largely genetic...
"Neither the existence nor the size of race differences in IQ are a
matter of dispute, only their cause," write the authors. The
Black-White difference has been found consistently from the time of
the massive World War I Army testing of 90 years ago to a massive
study of over 6 million corporate, military, and higher-education
test-takers in 2001.
"Race differences show up by 3 years of age, even after matching on
maternal education and other variables," said Rushton. "Therefore they
cannot be due to poor education since this has not yet begun to exert
an effect. That's why Jensen and I looked at the genetic hypothesis in
detail...
The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ
tests than Whites,
both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were developed for
use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the average IQ for
East Asians centers around 06; for Whites, about 100; and for Blacks
about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa...
Brain Size Differences. Studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
find a correlation of brain size with IQ of about 0.40. Larger brains
contain more neurons and synapses and process information faster. Race
differences in brain size are present at birth. By adulthood, East
Asians average 1 cubic inch more cranial capacity than Whites who
average 5 cubic inches more than Blacks...
Racial Admixture Studies. Black children with lighter skin, for
example, average higher IQ scores. In South Africa, the IQ of the
mixed-race "Colored" population averages 85, intermediate to the
African 70 and White 100...
No interventions such as ending segregation, introducing school
busing, or "Head Start" programs have reduced the gaps as culture-only
theory would predict...
Topaz
It's a Wonderful Race
by James Bronson
There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it
all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his
father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to
his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for
all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites throughout
history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the
Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and
we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for
thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations
for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we
are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed
peoples."
George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko
nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie
college professors teach you that?" the father asked.
To which the son replied: "That's the truth dad. My anthropology
professor, Dr.Irving Silverstein, says so. He ought to know. Dr.
Silverstein is a well-respected Ph.D. People of your generation just
don't understand because you were raised in a White supremacist racist
society. That's why I've come to admire Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King as
the greatest man in American history. He stood up to the racists of
your generation. Because of him, my generation of White kids is
completely colorblind."
The father angrily replied: "That's bullshit! I've always been
fair-minded and tolerant of people from all backgrounds and races. I
haven't 'oppressed' anybody, and furthermore there's nothing wrong
with being proud of one's own people, including the European race of
people. Your race is in your blood. It's like an extension of your
biological family and you ought to be proud of your European heritage
and identity, just like every other racial group in America is proud
of its. Why is it OK for them to have a strong sense of racial
identity but it's evil for us Europeans to feel that way?"
The young "intellectual" laughed at his father. "Come on dad, that's
the kind of crap Hitler tried to peddle. Those racist attitudes were
discredited years ago. There's only one race and that's the human
race. Diversity is our greatest strength. Differences in so-called
"race" are as insignificant as differences in belly buttons. And
besides, UN statistics now show that low White birth rates, along with
the fact that we live in an multicultural
society, will mean that Europeans and their ethnocentrist and racist
culture will have died out by the end of the century," young George
said.
Turning red with anger, the father yelled: "You are a walking clich�
you know that boy? And you think it's a good thing that the European
peoples of the world will have faded out and ceased to exist?" Young
George replied; "I think it's great! It will mean the end of racism
and the end of hate. The oppressed peoples of the world would have
been better off if us racist Europeans had never existed to begin
with."
Suddenly there was a blast of cold wind, an explosion, and a huge
smoke cloud. When the smoke had settled, George found himself alone
and lost in a cold open field. An angel named Clarence then appeared
to him and said "Well George, you've got your wish."
George asked: "Where am I? What's going on here? And who are you?"
The angel answered, "George, I'm Clarence the Angel. I was sent here
to show you what the world would have been like if Europeans, or
Whites, had never existed. You now live in a world where Europeans
never existed."
"Oh. That's cool. I'll have no problem adapting because there's not a
racist bone in my body. And when I get back to my world, I'll be able
to tell my professor and my friends how great this non-racist world
was. Say, I'm freezing my ass off out here. Where's the nearest
motel?"
"Motel?" replied the angel. "There are no motels here in what was once
called North America. But there are some caves up in those mountains
where you can find shelter."
"Caves? No way man. I want a nice warm bed to sleep in."
"I don't think you understand George. There are no buildings here in
non-white America because the evil Europeans never came here to build
them. Whites never existed, remember? The natives live in tents. Would
you like to go meet some local Indians? Perhaps they'll let you stay
in a tent."
"A tent? But it's 10 degrees outside?...Oh well. It's better than a
cave I suppose. Let's go talk to these Indians...... Wait a second,
are these Indians friendly or hostile?"
"Why, George, that's a racist question to ask. Just because some
Indians were brutal savages who scalped their victims alive, it
doesn't mean they all were" said the angel sarcastically.
"I know that Clarence. And I'm not a racist. I hate racism.
Nonetheless, I'd feel safer if I could have a gun to defend myself if
they turn out to be violent."
"Gun?" replied the angel. "There are no guns for you to defend
yourself with. Firearms were invented by evil Europeans. Though we
could make a spear with those twigs over there."
"That's too much work. Give me a telephone then. I'll call the Indians
to ask if it's OK."
"Telephone"? replied the angel. There are no telephones here.
Alexander Graham Bell was another evil white man, so he never existed.
No Europeans remember?" "Forget it then" replied George. "I'll sleep
in the damn cave."
Upon arriving at the cave, a shivering George asked the angel for a
lighter so that he could light a fire. "A lighter?" replied Clarence.
"There are no lighters here, and no matches. Those are European
gadgets and evil Europeans never existed remember? If you want to get
warm, you need to do like the locals do and start rubbing twigs
together."
"Oh come on man! You mean to tell me these people still rub sticks
together for fire?"
"That's right George. The Indians live exactly as they did before the
evil pilgrims arrived from Europe just a few centuries ago." said the
angel sarcastically.
"I refuse to stay in this cold cave and I damn sure ain't gonna light
a fire with twigs, and I refuse to sleep in a teepee. I'll go to South
America. I can make it in a warmer climate and I'll adapt quickly to
the great Incan civilization I learned about at college. Since
European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed, the
Incans will still be there.
... I need a car"
"Car?" replied the angel. "There are no cars here. Daimler and Benz,
the evil German inventors of the internal combustion engine, were
never born..nor was Henry Ford. There are no paved roads either. This
is a world without evil Europeans remember?"
"No cars! Oh. I'll just have to take a train."
"There are no trains in this world either George. Evil Europeans
weren't here to build locomotive engines or to discover the many uses
of coal, oil and gas, or to build trains or lay tracks. But I'll allow
you to cheat just a bit. Grab hold of my magic robe and we'll fly
south."
George touched the angel's robe and they flew south until they arrived
in an abandoned mud hut in the midst of Incan territory. George was
grateful for the warm weather but it wasn't long until he began to
complain about the heat and humidity.
"Clarence, this hut is a little shithole and I'm sweating up a storm
here. Get me an air-conditioner please."
"Air-conditioner?" replied the angel. "There are no air-conditioners
here. Air conditioning and refrigeration were inventions created by
evil White men." "What?!! You mean to tell me that in the year 2002
these people still haven't figured out a way to keep themselves or
their food cool? a frustrated George asked.
"No George, they haven't. And they never will."
"This is ridiculous. Let's go to the main city to see the Emperor. I
can't live like this. Where's a car...oh I forget...no cars! Dammit
I'll walk. let's go."
After walking through the jungle for about an hour or so, it began to
get dark. George then asked Clarence to give him a flashlight so that
he could see. "Flashlight? Sorry George, but Thomas Edison was an evil
White man too...and he was never born. There are some branches over
there if you want to make a torch."
"Never mind that!" George shouted back.
By morning time, Clarence and George had arrived at the temple of the
Incans. A bloody human sacrifice was in progress. George turned to
Clarence and cried, "They're going to butcher that poor soul! Somebody
has got to stop this. What horrible murdering beasts! Can't anyone
stop them?"
The angel replied "I'm afraid not. Ritual killings are common place
here."Those evil European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro
never existed so the Incans just continued their brutal ways. In fact,
it was the oppressed peoples themselves who made up the bulk of the
Spanish armed forces. The people saw the Spaniards as liberators who
would rid them of the oppressive Incan and Mayan rulers and give them
a better life."
"I can't blame them for helping the Spaniards then. This is a horrible
place. Get me out of this shithole now!" said George.
'Where would you like to go?" Clarence replied.
George said: "Take me to Africa, maybe there's a more advanced and
humane civilization there that I can fit into. Where the nearest
airport?"
"Oh, I forgot...no Wright Brothers." George said. "How about a boat?"
"Boats?" replied the angel. "I'm afraid the most seaworthy rafts
available to you won't be of much help in crossing the vast Atlantic
Ocean. The great Viking sailors and European navigators never existed.
No Phoenicians, no Leif Erickson, no Henry the Navigator, no Columbus,
no Magellan, no Hudson and no Robert Fulton. Even if you could build
your own ship, there would be no compass for you to navigate with and
no sextant either. I'm afraid you're stuck here George."
"Can I touch your robe and fly to Africa then" asked George.
"You're cheating again George, but all right. Touch my robe and we'll
fly to Africa."
When they arrived in Africa, George saw thousands of half-naked
African tribesmen being herded along a dirt path. They were guarded by
other Africans with spears. "What are they doing to those poor men?"
George asked Clarence.
"They are being enslaved by another tribe. Slavery was common in
Africa long before the whites arrived." Clarence said. "In fact, most
of the slaves who were shipped to the Americas were sold to the slave
traders by African tribal leaders."
"That's so sad.' George said. "I want to meet Martin Luther King.
Since his White assassin never existed, this great man should still be
alive. He's probably a great tribal chief somewhere and leader of an
advanced civilization. He will free these slaves from their African
masters. Take me to him Clarence."
Clarence led George to a little hut deep in the heart of Africa. The
naked women and children looked at George in wonder. The young men
were out on a hunt but the older men stayed behind. George was led to
the dingy little hut of the tribal witchdoctor and spiritual leader.
There he saw a wild-looking man with a necklace of teeth around his
neck and a huge ring pierced through his nose. "What the hell is that?
George asked.
"Meet Witch-doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga" Clarence said. He never
became Reverend Martin Luther King because there were no universities
or seminaries built to educate him. Europeans weren't there to create
such opportunities. But he did become the tribe's spiritual leader. He
specializes in casting evil spells. Perhaps he can help you?"
The witch doctor gazed in wonder at George. Then he motioned to his
henchmen to seize young George. The tribesmen grabbed hold of George
and tied him to a nearby tree.
"Stop it! Let me go. What are they going to do to me?" cried George
hysterically.
"They're going to perform a ritual killing on you George. The good
doctor King...I mean Kinga -- believes that by cutting your heart out
while you are still alive, it will bring good fortune and fertility to
his tribe," laughed Clarence.
"Clarence! Clarence! Help me Clarence! Help me!
"But George, you told me that you wanted to go to Africa and to meet
your hero Reverend King."
George said: "This part of Africa has not developed yet. I can see
that now. Take me to North Africa where Egypt and Carthage established
great civilizations. Just get me out of here, please."
Just as the witch doctor's spear was about to carve out George's
heart, George vanished into thin air. He then found himself on the
banks of the river Nile in Egypt.
"Thank you Clarence. Thank you," George said. "I don't understand it
Clarence. Why does so much of the world remain so brutal and
primitive? I learned during Black History Month about many talented
black inventors and scientists. Garrett Morgan, George Washington
Carver, Benjamin Banneker, Granville Woods. Then there's Dr. Carson,
the preeminent brain surgeon in all of America. Where are these men?"
Clarence replied: "Don't you understand yet? America, and Africa,
exist exactly as they did before the Europeans discovered them.
Civilization as you had known it had only been introduced to these
people just a few centuries ago by the Europeans. There are no
universities, no hospitals, no means of transportation other than
animals, no science, no medicine, no machines. In fact, the wheel
hasn't even been discovered in Sub-Saharan
Africa! Those black scientists, inventors, doctors, athletes, and
entertainers you speak of were never given the opportunity to realize
their full human potential because Europeans weren't around to
introduce higher civilization and learning to them. There are no
George Washington Carvers in this non-European world, no Dr. Carsons,
no Booker T. Washingtons, no Benjamin Bannekers, no Michael Jordans,
no Oprah Winfreys, no Bill Cosbys, no..."
"Stop it! That can't be!" cried George. "Let's walk over to the great
pyramids of Egypt right now and I'll show you one of the great wonders
of the world .....built by non-Whites"
They walked a few miles before George stopped and asked where the
nearest toilet was. "Toilets?" replied the angel. There are no toilets
or urinals in this world. Plumbing was developed by evil Europeans.
The people in this non-White world still relieve themselves in open
fields."
Clarence turned around so George could do his business. "I need some
toilet paper." George said.
"Toilet paper?" replied the angel. "There..."
"I know. I know. Toilet paper hasn't been invented yet. Just hand me a
rag then".
Clarence obliged and the two of them went on their way.
"I don't understand. According to my recollections from Geography
class, the great pyramids should be near this very spot. We ought to
be able to see them from miles away," said George.
"Well, George, I'm sure your professors at the college never told you
this, but the ancient Egyptians were not black or brown. They were
Caucasians. The anthropologists who examined the Egyptian mummies
confirmed this fact. There are no pyramids and no Sphinx either. And
the Carthaginians were White too."
George became depressed, but he was determined to prove his beliefs.
"What's in Europe?" he asked.
"Europe became populated by Huns and other Asiatic tribes. They've
settled down a bit but life is much the same as it is in North
America. A nomadic existence based on hunting and food gathering. No
great cities, no science, no buildings, no culture, no fine art - just
a hard daily struggle against life and the elements of nature. In a
Europe without evil Whites, the Roman Empire never existed nor did the
Greeks. There was no Renaissance either."
"Take me to Asia then. Surely the great civilizations of Persia,
India, China, and Japan will suit me" George said. "Clarence, to the
Taj Mahal please." "The Taj Mahal?" replied the angel. "Don't you know
that the ancient Persian and Indian civilizations were established by
ancient Indo-European tribes who crossed the Himalayas? They are the
ones who civilized India and built the Taj Mahal. Those are the great
civilizations
that Marco Polo, Columbus, and others were searching for.Did you know
that Iran is Persian for "land of the Aryan?"
George said: "Don't tell me that the Indians were White men! That
can't be. In the world I came from, I knew many Indians and they were
not White!"
Clarence explained: "As the centuries passed, the Indo-Europeans who
created Indian civilization intermarried with the native majorities
who populated the Indian subcontinent. Gradually there were less and
less evil White people until they faded out completely, along with the
advanced civilization they had built. You will notice that there are
still a few white-skinned and fair-haired Indians and Pakistanis
around today -- in the world you came from that is.
George became worried. He knew he could never fit into the harsh
primitive world he had been thrust into. Suddenly he thought of Japan.
"Japan! I'll show you now Clarence. Take me to Japan. If the Japanese
can make TVs and cameras then I'm sure I'll find a decent civilization
that I can live in."
Clarence transported George to Japan. George observed that Japanese
society was the most orderly, advanced and civil that he had seen, but
it seemed as if almost everyone was either a rice farmer, a fisherman,
or a soldier. There were no cars, no skyscrapers, no lights, no
stereos, no sciences, no technologies, no universities. It was a
stagnant agricultural society that seemed to have reached its high
water mark and was incapable of moving forward. George knew he could
not live here either.
Clarence explained to George: "Even the industrious Japanese and
Chinese peoples had to rely on the evil Europeans to build the modern
Asia that you had in mind. In this world, Japan exists exactly as it
did before Commodore Perry's American naval ships arrived in Japan in
the 1850s. There's no industry, no technology, no Fuji film, no Sony,
no Hitachi, no Panasonic, no Toyota, no Sushi bars, no baseball...none
of the trappings or comforts of modern life. These things don't exist
in Japan or anywhere else because
Europeans weren't there to create them and share them with the rest of
the world. Would you care for a bowl of rice George?"
George began to feel sick in both his body and his mind. Not only was
he depressed, but exposure to the harsh elements of nature had left
him physically ill. "Clarence, I seem to have contracted some type of
sickness. I must have some anti-biotics."
"Anti-biotics? There's no...
"Oh Shut up already! Then just take me back to the world as it was!"
"Sorry George. I'm not authorized to do that. Only my boss can make
that call." Clarence said to him: "You see George. Your father was
right. You really had a wonderful race. Don't you see what a foolish
mistake it is to be ashamed and guilty about your own people, and to
let them die out? This is what the world would be like without the
creative spark of Edison and Ford and Pasteur and Marconi. No great
scientists, or mathematicians, or inventors or fine artists. No
Archimedes, no Aristotle, no Socrates, no
Alexander, no Renaissance, no Newton, no Kepler, no Goddard, no
Mendel, no Tesla, no Faraday, no Guttenberg, no Shakespeare, no
Dickens, no Twain, no Mozart, no Beethoven, no Da Vinci, no
Michelangelo, no Galileo, no Copernicus. No Venice, no Paris, no
Lisbon, no Madrid, no Zurich, no Berlin, no St. Petersburg, no
Budapest, no Rome, no Milan, no Vienna, no London, no New York, no
Rio, no Sydney. No orchestras, no museums, no universities, no
hospitals, no libraries, no theaters, no radio, no books, no
television, no electricity, no refrigeration, no heating, no plumbing,
no houses, no steel, no stadiums, no vaccines, no cars, no planes, no
trains, no ships, no
dentists, no surgeons, no computers, no telephones, and most important
- there's no creative genius to be found that could create and sustain
such a high level of civilization. There's nothing for the people of
this world to build upon. It's just a daily struggle for subsistence.
A brutal planet where the few people who aren't mired in eternal
ignorance and darkness have reached their peak of civilization and are
advancing no further."
Clarence went on to lecture the broken and depressed young man for
seven days straight. He covered everything. History, science,
economics, philosophy, art, literature, fine music, architecture,
medicine, politics, agriculture, religion, and all the creations and
contributions that the European peoples had made in every conceivable
field of human endeavor. George listened closely to every word. He
felt like a man who had been
reborn.
After his lecture, Clarence the Angel floated away towards heaven. "I
hope you have found all this to be educational, and I hope you have
learned an important lesson. Enjoy your world George!" mocked the
departing angel.
George began to sob like a baby. It was the year 2002 and he was alone
and hungry in a backwards world where Europeans had never existed. He
cried out to the stars: "Please God. I see what a fool I've been. I
understand now what my father was trying to tell me. I want to go back
to the world that I came from. A world where Europeans not only
existed, but blessed the rest of humanity world with their unique
creative ability. I want to live in a civilized world. Please
God!...take me back!...take me back!...Oh God....please."
Suddenly George was transported back to his college dormitory. Drunk
with joy, George jumped into the showers before he could even take his
clothes off!.
"Warm water! and soap! Life is beautiful!" he screamed.
George's floor mates looked at him as if he was crazy. "George! Have
you gone crazy?" asked a bewildered schoolmate.
"No my friend. I haven't taken leave of my senses. I've come to them!"
George replied. George then began to sing classic European folk songs
in the shower. Miraculously, he was able to sing in many different
languages. He sang O Sole Mio in Italian, Amazing Grace in English,
Gloire Immortelle in French, Das Ist Der Tag in German, and also
Belgian, Spanish and French ballads and waltzes. Tears of sheer joy
began to stream down his cheeks. The degenerate music of Hip-Hop and
Rap lost all of its appeal to young George.
After his shower, George drove to a nearby restaurant and ordered two
whole entrees. One was Lasagna and the other was a delicious Veal
Marsala. With his Italian food he had a Greek salad with Spanish
olives and Russian dressing, drank a whole bottle of French wine,
followed by a German pastry for dessert. He finished his meal off with
a hot cup of English tea and a Cuban cigar.
George said out loud: "Oh those European peoples and their delicious
cuisine. Clarence was right after all. What a wonderful race!"
George was happy, but at the same time he realized there was much work
to be done. He thought of all those poor whites in Rhodesia and South
Africa who were being murdered and raped ever since they gave up
control of those once-European nations. He thought of the many
thousands of qualified Whites who were passed up for good jobs and
college entrance because of racial quotas that discriminate against
Europeans. He thought about the declining birthrates among all the
European nations of the world. He remembered that
Europeans everywhere were dwindling in numbers every year even as
their own nations were being flooded with third world immigration. He
recalled the O.J. Simpson verdict and how millions of blacks in
America cheered when that brutal double murderer was set free by a
black jury after he stabbed two Whites to death. He remembered the Los
Angeles riots of 1992, where dozens of Whites were dragged out of
their vehicles and killed like dogs in the streets by packs of
White-hating monsters who were never even punished! He remembered the
time when Jesse Jackson led a cheer at Stanford University: "Hey Hey
Ho Ho, Western Civ. has got to go!" His European blood began to
boil in righteous indignation when he recalled how Jesse Jackson once
said he had spit in White people's food when he was a young restaurant
worker. George now understood that that his people were on a collision
course with worldwide disaster and genocide. George realized that this
great people must not perish from the face of the earth.
George could not wait to see his father. He longed to embrace him and
apologize for all of the foolish and disrespectful things he had said
to him. But first, George had a score to settle with a certain college
professor. He walked into Dr. Silverstein's auditorium and quietly
took a seat in the back row. The nasal voiced Silverstein was
lecturing on and on
about racial and gender inequalities in European-centered
civilizations. It was vintage Silverstein. George's impressionable
White schoolmates, with their baggy pants, hip-hop clothes and
backwards baseball caps, were swallowing Silverstein's poison pills
hook, line and sinker. After letting Silverstein spew his cultural
poison for about 15 minutes or so, George raised his hand so that he
could give the professor a piece of his newly educated mind.
"George? Is that you? I remember you from last semester. I wasn't
aware that you were here today. I failed to recognize you in that
shirt and tie, and without your earrings. You must have enjoyed my
course so much that you signed up again eh? Class, I'd like for you to
meet George. He was one of my brightest students last semester. He
truly has a thorough grasp of the ideas presented in this course.
George, would you be so kind as to tell my class about that brilliant
term paper you wrote about European racism,
imperialism, and the need for monetary reparations?"
That's when young George let loose on the unsuspecting Professor.
"ENOUGH! You scheming devil! You mendacious fabricator of falsehoods!
You pusillanimous purveyor of pinko propaganda! How dare you try to
corrupt and manipulate our young minds when your filthy lies. We
Europeans have nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to apologize for, and
everything to be proud of. And most of all, we don't owe anybody
jack-shit - not one thin dime! To the contrary, it is the rest of
humanity that owes us a debt which can never be repaid! We are the
rightful heirs and protectors of a rich cultural heritage. You vile
manipulator! We are the sons of the Romans, the sons of
the Greeks, the Celtics, the Vikings, the Normans, the Saxons. Why do
you inflict shame and guilt upon us? We Europeans didn't just
contribute to civilization...WE ARE CIVILIZATION! And I declare that I
will no longer tolerate you shithead "intellectuals" trying to tear
our people down. Never again will we walk on eggshells when we speak,
always fearing that we might be called "racist." I no longer care what
people think. All that matters is the truth which you have sought to
pervert!"
"What are you up to anyway? Why do you to corrupt my young peers by
shoving false heroes down their throats. Enough of your Marxist games
of divide and conquer, you commie pinko subversive! I don't want to
learn anymore about Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton or
Black History Month. They would not have amounted to anything without
the institutions of high civilization created by the European peoples.
I'm going to set this class straight about who the truly great men of
history are - the European
statesmen, scientists, explorers, monarchs, navigators, conquerors,
inventors, artists, writers, philosophers - the innovative giants of
history that you and your ilk have erased from our collective
memories. You speak of a world liberated from European influence?
Permit me tell your students about such a world, Silverstein, because
I can speak from personal experience, you wretched little conspiring
monster!"
Silverstein turned white as a ghost. He was shell-shocked and rendered
speechless for the first time in his career! Never in all of his years
at the University had a student dared to so boldly challenge his
falsehoods. Speaking from the heart as well as the mind, and with an
eloquence he never thought he could muster, George broke out into a
60-minute monologue on history, science, philosophy, culture, and all
the other attributes that
constitute high civilization. The young students were captivated by
George's brilliant oratory. Many were moved to tears. By the end of
his tirade, George's reawakened classmates were thundering their
approval of his speech. The class gave George a standing ovation and
they thanked him for helping them rediscover and reclaim their own
sense of pride and lost identity. The unstoppable power of truth had
melted away years of Marxist guilt tripping, self hate, wimpishness
and cultural brainwashing in just one unforgettable hour. The inspired
students proceeded to storm out of Silverstein's class,
throwing their hip-hop baseball caps and nose earrings at him as they
stampeded out and vowed never to return. They lifted George up upon
their shoulders and carried him out of the auditorium like a
conquering hero. With a glint in his eye, George glanced up towards
the sky, winked and said "Thank you, Clarence."
Dr. Silverstein was left humiliated and visibly shaken. He knew that
these reawakened European kids could never again be brainwashed with
"political correctness" and White guilt. Silverstein's greatest fear
was that more of these proud European youths would one day reawaken
and take their country and civilization back from the Silversteins of
the world.
Silverstein was worried, but he remained confident that most young men
and women would never learn the truth about their glorious past and
unique creative abilities. After all, the mass media, Hollywood, the
music industry, the colleges, and the public schools are all
controlled by "liberals" like Dr. Silverstein. With the power of
political correctness in their hands, they can continue to tear down
our European ancestors, destroy our
institutions and traditions, instigate blacks and other races against
the whites, flood America with third-world immigration, and push
"hip-hop" music, homosexuality, and other garbage onto a weak,
confused and morally degenerate youth. After reflecting upon these
facts, Silverstein smiled a devilish grin and muttered to himself: "A
few of these European sheep may wake up to what's being done to them,
but the majority of these idiots never will." And he smiled
again....and laughed with diabolical Marxist glee. Then
he repeated to himself "No...they will never figure it all out until
it's too late."
Or will they?
Topaz
wrote:
"He must be regarded as a popular leader who took up His position
against Jewry... The Jews, by the way, regarded Him as the son of a
whore and a Roman soldier ... For the Galilean's object was to
liberate His country from Jewish oppression. He set Himself against
Jewish capitalism, and that's why the Jews liquidated Him. ,... Jesus
was most certainly not a Jew. The Jews would never have handed one of
their own people to the Roman courts; they would have condemned Him
themselves. ...Jesus fought against the materialism of His age, and,
therefore, against the Jews.... a declaration of war on the golden
calf, on the egotism and the materialism of the Jews"
Adolf Hitler
George Plimpton
>
> http://www.rense.com/general77/racedif.htm
> Race Differences In Average IQ Are Mostly Genetic, Not Cultural
> Medical Research News
Correct. That's why if a high-IQ black man marries a high-IQ black
woman, their children are likely also to be endowed with high IQ.
Simple, really.
Bob LeChevalier
>On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:18:17 +1200, "Geopelia" <phil...@xtra.co.nz>
>wrote:
>
>
>>> In race mixing the blonds are the first to go. They don't have a lot
>>> of blonds in Portugal.
>>
>>The blond genes are recessive. It is not just racial mixing that brings
>>fewer natural blonds.
>>In England, when country people married mates from their own or neighbouring
>>villages, blonds of Saxon descent usually married others. With the movement
>>to cities, they had a much wider choice of mate.
>>
>>It will be interesting to see what happens as African genes from the West
>>Indian immigration of the fifties spread through the population.
>>
>
>
>"Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE
>problem.
Sane people say that there is NO race problem. But there is a RACIST
problem.
>Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the
>third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white
>countries."
I don't say so, so your universal claim about "everybody" is thereby
proven to be a lie.
Geopelia
(rest snipped for length.)
That story has been around for some time.
The world does owe a lot to "white" inventors.
But isn't it possible that if whites hadn't evolved, other humans could
have invented similar things over the millennia?
Look at the Chinese. Over their four thousand years of history, they have
produced many inventions, and had a great civilization (and even a civil
service with examinations!) when Europe was in the Dark Ages.
Communism is just another hiccup on their long road to the future.
(to mix a metaphor).
Everyone should be proud of their own race. But is that any reason to feel
superior to our fellow humans?
Bert Hyman
wrote:
> Everyone should be proud of their own race.
Why would you be "proud" of something that happened to you by accident?
Virtue by association makes no more sense than does guilt by
association.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com
Topaz
"There are various names for the ideology of the elite. Some call it
"political correctness." Others call it "Cultural Marxism." But the
labels don't matter as long as one understands what is going on: the
ruling elites are waging a cultural and racial war against Western
values, Western civilization, and particularly Western man, i.e., the
white man. In the name of the feel-good mantras of diversity and
multiculturalism, all the values of traditional white civilization
have been declared bad and everything opposed to them declared good.
Every idea, attitude, and institution that protects the white race and
promotes its continued existence is being destroyed, as a precondition
for the physical destruction of the race itself. No arena of life is
spared this agenda's icy grip. Every movie, television show, news
story, book, and sermon must advance it, under the watchful eye of an
army of censors and snitches demanding unyielding fidelity to the
agenda. No argument or evidence is allowed to challenge it."
J.B. Cash
Topaz
wrote:
>That story has been around for some time.
>The world does owe a lot to "white" inventors.
>But isn't it possible that if whites hadn't evolved, other humans could
>have invented similar things over the millennia?
There is no evolution when everyone is provided with food stamps. Not
that there is anything wrong with food stamps. Survival of the fittest
was evolution, but it wasn't the most pleasant situation. Happily,
today we could have both food stamps and evolution as long as we have
sterilization. This planet needs to have the most intelligent people
having many children, while those on the other end of the scale should
have none. That would bring about evolution, and without the miserable
situation of survival of the fittest.
>
>Look at the Chinese. Over their four thousand years of history, they have
>produced many inventions, and had a great civilization (and even a civil
>service with examinations!) when Europe was in the Dark Ages.
Indo-European: The Mummies of Xinjiang
The Mummies of Xinjiang
In the dry hills of this central Asian province, archeologist have
unearthed more than 100 corpses hat are as much s 4,000 years old.
Astonishingly well preserved - and Caucasian.
One glimpse of the corpses was enough to shock Victor Mair profoundly.
In 1987, Mair, a professor of Chinese at the University of
Pennsylvania, was leading a tour group through a museum in the Chinese
city of Urumqi, in the central Asian province of Xinjiang, when he
accidentally strayed into gloomy, newly opened room. There, under
glass, lay the recently discovered corpses of a family - a man, a
woman, and a child of two or three - each clad in long, dark purple
woolen garments and felt boots. Even today I get chills thinking about
that first encounter," says Mair. "The Chinese said they were 3,000
years old, yet the bodies looked as if they were buried yesterday."
But the real shock came when Mair looked closely at their faces. In
contrast to most central Asian peoples,these corpses had obvious
Caucasian, or European, features - blond hair, long noses, deep-set
eyes, and long skulls."I was thunderstruck," Mair recalls. "Even
though I was supposed to be leading a tour group, I just couldn't
leave that room. The questions kept nagging at me: Who were these
people? How did they get out here at such an early date?"
The corpses Mair saw that day were just a few of more than 100 dug up
by
Chinese archeologists over the past 16 years. All of them are
astonishingly
well preserved.They come from four major burial sites scattered
between the arid foothills of the Tian Shan ("Celestial Mountains") in
northwest China and the fringes of the The Taklimakan Desert, some 150
miles due south. All together, these bodies,dating from about 2000
B.C. to 300 B.C., constitute significant addition to the world's
catalog of prehistoric mummies. Unlike the roughly contemporaneous
mummies of ancient Egypt, the Xinjiang mummies were not ruler or
nobles; they were not interred in pyramids or other such monuments,nor
were they subjected to deliberate mummification procedures.
They were preserved merely by being buried in the parched, stony
desert, where daytime temperatures often soar over 100 degrees. In the
heat the bodies were quickly dried, with facial hair, skin, and other
tissues remaining largely intact.
Where exactly did these apparent Caucasians come from? And what were
they doing at remote desert oases in central Asia?
Any answers to these questions will most likely fuel a wide-ranging
debate about the role outsiders played in the rise of Chinese
civilization. As far back as the second century B.C., Chinese texts
refer to alien peoples called the Yuezhi and the Wusun, who lived on
China's far western borders; the texts make it clear that these people
were regarded as troublesome "barbarians." Until recently, scholars
have tended to downplay evidence of any early trade or contact between
China and the West, regarding the development of Chinese civilization
as an essentially homegrown affair scaled off from outside influences;
indeed, this view is still extremely congenial to the present Chinese
regime. Yet some archeologists have begun to argue that these supposed
barbarians might have been responsible for introducing into China such
basic items as the wheel and the first metal objects. Exactly who
these central Asian outsiders might have been, however what language
they spoke and where they came from - is a puzzle. No wonder, then,
that scholars see the discovery of the blond mummies as a sensational
new clue...
Most researchers now think the birthplace of horsedrawn vehicles and
horse riding was in the steppes east and west of the Urals rather than
in China or the Near East. As archeologist David Anthony and his
colleagues have shown through microscopic study of ancient horse
teeth, horses were already being harnessed in the Ukraine 6,000 years
ago. The Ukraine horses, Anthony found, show a particular kind of
tooth wear identical to that of modern horses that "fight the bit."
The world's earliest high-status vehicles also seem to have originated
in the steppes; recent discoveries of wooden chariots with elaborate
spoked wheels were reported by Anthony to date to around 2000 B.C.
Chariots do not seem to have appeared in China until some 800 years
later...
had wagons and well-tailored clothes. Were they mere goat and sheep
farmers? Or did they profit from or even control prehistoric trade
along the route that later became the Silk Road? If so, they probably
helped spread the first wheels and certain metalworking skills into
China.
"Ultimately I think our project may end up having tremendous
implications for the origins of Chinese civilization," Mair reflects.
"For all their incredible inventiveness, the ancient Chinese weren't
cut off from the rest of the world, and influences didn't just flow
one way, from China westward."
Unfortunately, economics dictates that answers will be slow in coming.
The Chinese have the money to spare for this work, and Wang and his
team continue to operate on a shoestring. Currently most of the
corpses and artifacts are stored in a damp, crowded basement room at
the Institute of Archeology in Urumqi, in conditions that threaten
their continued preservation. If Mair's plans for a museum can be
financed with Western help, perhaps the mummies can be moved. Then,
finally, they'll receive the study and attention that will ultimately
unlock their secrets.
>Communism is just another hiccup on their long road to the future.
>(to mix a metaphor).
>
>Everyone should be proud of their own race. But is that any reason to feel
>superior to our fellow humans?
>
We should base policies on truth not falsehood. The truth is that
Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks.
Topaz
wrote:
>On 6/16/2011 6:03 PM, Topaz wrote:
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
George Plimpton
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:56:35 -0700, George Plimpton<geo...@si.not>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/16/2011 6:03 PM, Topaz wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.rense.com/general77/racedif.htm
>>> Race Differences In Average IQ Are Mostly Genetic, Not Cultural
>>> Medical Research News
>>
>> Correct. That's why if a high-IQ black man marries a high-IQ black
>> woman, their children are likely also to be endowed with high IQ.
>>
>> Simple, really.
>
>
> The former White nations and Japan are the first world.
No.
Geopelia
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:28:34 +1200, "Geopelia" <phil...@xtra.co.nz>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mr. Smartypants" <bc...@canada.con> wrote in message
>>news:ppidnbP4vb9Dz3DQ...@giganews.com...
>>> On 6/6/2011 3:16 PM, americanpatriot213 wrote:
>>>> Of course,everyone's Souls are the same color. Jesus Christ didn't
>>>> die just for caucasians (which would be odd since Christ was not even
>>>> European, but middle-eastern).
>>>
>>> Jesus Christ was a black African.
>>
>>He was a Jew.
>>
>
>
> "He must be regarded as a popular leader who took up His position
> against Jewry... The Jews, by the way, regarded Him as the son of a
> whore and a Roman soldier ... For the Galilean's object was to
> liberate His country from Jewish oppression. He set Himself against
> Jewish capitalism, and that's why the Jews liquidated Him. ,... Jesus
> was most certainly not a Jew. The Jews would never have handed one of
> their own people to the Roman courts; they would have condemned Him
> themselves. ...Jesus fought against the materialism of His age, and,
> therefore, against the Jews.... a declaration of war on the golden
> calf, on the egotism and the materialism of the Jews"
>
> Adolf Hitler
Adolf was a clueless fool. The German Jews were the brains of Germany, and
could have won him the war if given the chance.
Jesus was handed to the Romans because Pilate had the power to crucify him,
which the Jews hadn't.
Their argument was that if Pilate let him go, he was no friend of Caesar,
which Pilate couldn't ignore, although he washed his hands of it.
Jesus objected to the too strict observance of the law, especially the
Sabbath and the treatment of a woman taken in adultery.
He also caused a disturbance in the Temple by objecting to the money
changers and those who sold doves for sacrifice, who were making it a den of
thieves.
The Scribes and Pharisees didn't like his teachings in some respects. But
there is no reason to think he was against the Law and traditions of his
people in general. He would have been like a somewhat unorthodox rabbi.
And he called himself the Son of Man, not the Son of God.
(Read the Sermon on the Mount. Google it for various commentaries.)
Whether you believe in the Virgin Birth or not, there is no need to insult a
very good woman. Where on earth did Adolf get that ridiculous idea? Mary
must have been an incredibly strong person. How many of us today could stand
by a cross and watch our child die?
We can laugh at Adolf's stupidity these days. But unfortunately many Germans
believed him, with tragic consequences.
Geopelia.
(I'm agnostic)
Bob LeChevalier
>On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:59:03 +1200, "Geopelia" <phil...@xtra.co.nz>
>wrote:
>
>>That story has been around for some time.
>>The world does owe a lot to "white" inventors.
>>But isn't it possible that if whites hadn't evolved, other humans could
>>have invented similar things over the millennia?
>
>There is no evolution when everyone is provided with food stamps.
Of course there is. There is no way to STOP evolution, since
mutations happen.
>Not
>that there is anything wrong with food stamps. Survival of the fittest
>was evolution,
No. Survival of the fittest is a slogan that represents an
oversimplified version of ONE ASPECT of evolution. Even with that
correction, "fittest" almost certain means something other than what
you are presuming that it means.
>but it wasn't the most pleasant situation.
It hasn't stopped. And most of us find life much more pleasant than
the alternative, especially with the Nazis reduced to puling idiots
like you.
>Happily, today we could have both food stamps and evolution as long as we have
>sterilization.
Sterilization would prevent evolution, by eliminating reproduction. Of
course it would also eliminate the human race.
>This planet needs to have the most intelligent people having many children,
Entirely unclear. Intelligence may be useful, but it isn't the only
thing that is useful, and not necessarily most important. Given that
significant intelligence has evolved in only a few of the millions of
species on earth, it suggests that the costs of increased intelligence
usually outweigh the benefits.
It isn't clear that the planet needs to have any human beings at all.
It might be better off if we-all went away.
>while those on the other end of the scale should have none.
You have the right to sterilize yourself and thereby help achieve
that. Otherwise, what you "think" should be is nothing the rest of us
want anything to do with.
>That would bring about evolution,
No more than the opposite would.
>and without the miserable situation of survival of the fittest.
No more than the opposite would.
>>Everyone should be proud of their own race. But is that any reason to feel
>>superior to our fellow humans?
>
>We should base policies on truth not falsehood.
Your version of "truth" is one such falsehood.
>The truth is that Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks.
The truth is that there is no such thing as a "white" nor a "black".
They are figments of your idiotology.
Geopelia
"Bob LeChevalier" <loj...@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:746pv6p7p9u4sqdb1...@4ax.com...
I wonder how long it will take for the planet to recover after humans become
extinct.
Perhaps the birds will take over from the mammals. Rats should continue for
quite some time though.
But I doubt if any other species with our kind of intelligence will arise
again. The apes will become extinct before we do, at the present rate, and
they might have taken over.
Earth has survived many disasters and extinctions. We will be just another
failed species.
Geopelia
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:56:35 -0700, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not>
> wrote:
>
>>On 6/16/2011 6:03 PM, Topaz wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.rense.com/general77/racedif.htm
>>> Race Differences In Average IQ Are Mostly Genetic, Not Cultural
>>> Medical Research News
>>
>>Correct. That's why if a high-IQ black man marries a high-IQ black
>>woman, their children are likely also to be endowed with high IQ.
>>
>>Simple, really.
>
>
> The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
> nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
> world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
> It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
> the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
> people in India.
Of course. They have lived for centuries much further North.
They are light skinned for the same reason Northern Europeans are lighter
skinned than Mediterranean people, and both are lighter than Africans.
Lighter skin is more suitable in places with lower light levels.
> All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
> intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
> important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
> the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
> are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
>
Usually 'whites' have designed the intelligence tests, for people educated
by white society.
It's a matter of culture, not race.
Geopelia
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:59:03 +1200, "Geopelia" <phil...@xtra.co.nz>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>That story has been around for some time.
>>The world does owe a lot to "white" inventors.
>>But isn't it possible that if whites hadn't evolved, other humans could
>>have invented similar things over the millennia?
>
> There is no evolution when everyone is provided with food stamps. Not
> that there is anything wrong with food stamps. Survival of the fittest
> was evolution, but it wasn't the most pleasant situation. Happily,
> today we could have both food stamps and evolution as long as we have
> sterilization. This planet needs to have the most intelligent people
> having many children, while those on the other end of the scale should
> have none. That would bring about evolution, and without the miserable
> situation of survival of the fittest.
>
>
>>
>>Look at the Chinese. Over their four thousand years of history, they have
>>produced many inventions, and had a great civilization (and even a civil
>>service with examinations!) when Europe was in the Dark Ages.
>
>
> Indo-European: The Mummies of Xinjiang
> The Mummies of Xinjiang
> In the dry hills of this central Asian province, archeologist have
> unearthed more than 100 corpses hat are as much s 4,000 years old.
> Astonishingly well preserved - and Caucasian.
(Had to snip for length)
>
>
>>Communism is just another hiccup on their long road to the future.
>>(to mix a metaphor).
>>
>>Everyone should be proud of their own race. But is that any reason to feel
>>superior to our fellow humans?
>>
>
> We should base policies on truth not falsehood. The truth is that
> Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks.
By what standards?
The results depend on the kind of intelligence test, and the similarity of
education and living conditions.
The very poor and illiterate will not do so well in most intelligence tests,
whatever their race.
Given the same conditions, race will not make any difference.
Look at America and Britain, where blacks and whites now have equal
opportunities.
Topaz
Questions Needing Answers
by Val Koinen
...Blacks in the United States are lauded for their
efforts and activities along the lines of black pride; black power;
affirmative action and other (black) racial preferences; colored
advancement associations; civil disobedience; reparations blackmail;
African studies and African culture; black history; celebrating their
stupidly contrived, totally bogus, and laughable Kwanzaa holiday event
and forcing its recognition on our White communities; and on and on ad
nauseam. In fact, many of those self-aggrandizing and in-group
promotional, race-centered efforts and activities are encouraged and
financially supported by our very own government, using taxpayers'
money that overwhelmingly comes out of our (Whites') pockets, by the
way.
And that's not the only contrast in the way different social, legal,
and political standards are applied to White racial interests in
comparison with those of other ethnic groups. Do you remember the
outrage that was expressed almost daily by the Jew-dominated major
media over the Apartheid policies of South Africa a few years ago
(when that country was still a viable White-controlled nation)? And
how the Serbs were censured and then militarily attacked for their so-
called "ethnic cleansing" efforts a few years back? Surely, you have
noticed how the same establishment press berates and ridicules the
thinking of White separatist groups every chance it gets. Isn't it
curious, then, how few people seem to notice that the Israeli Jews
have long advocated and worked toward the "transfer" (their euphemism
for ethnic cleansing) of Palestinians from their beggar country? While
at the same time their Jewish soulmates and loyal Zionist associates
who control the media in the United States work day and night to
actively promote diversity, multiculturism, and racial mixing in
America (and especially, the mixing of White girls with Negro males)?
And then of course there are the Mexican and other Hispanic illegals
and other non-U.S. citizens of those groups, who take our jobs, demand
driver licenses, suck up untold millions of dollars of American
taxpayers' money for welfare and health care and other social
services, burden our schools and communities with demands for special
Spanish-language provisions, overload our criminal justice system
wherever they concentrate, and who are hardly even mildly rebuked for
openly talking of their impending Reconquista of our southwestern
states. While we Whites are virtually forbidden from celebrating and
promoting our own racial heritage and interests, countless mostly-
White communities around the country, and in particular our children
in the schools, are constantly badgered into celebrating the Hispanic
presence, culture, and tradition.
Surprisingly, very few Whites in America realize that it was largely
due to the efforts of the Jews that the floodgates of non-White
immigration were opened in 1965 -- and have been kept open since --
with the result of drastically changing the racial make-up of our
country. Non-Hispanic Whites made up nearly 90% of the population in
1960 and still 75% as recently as 1990, but we are headed toward
becoming a minority as compared to non-Whites by the year 2050 if not
before (already, non-Whites comprise a whopping 40% of children aged
15 and under in this country).
Maybe you aren't aware of these things, and haven't given any thought
to them -- but I am, and I have. And I don't much like what I see
happening. I'm White and proud of it, and I intend to speak up for the
future of my race; of my progeny!
Perhaps we should start by asking ourselves some situationally
relevant questions, such as:
If you don't like the horrendous tax burden you and your family must
carry on your backs, and the present-day costs of social welfare, what
do you think it will be like when we Whites become a racial minority?
If, largely because of those costs, you don't think you and your
spouse can afford to have more than one, or at the most two children;
how many kids do you think your children will be able to afford? As
many as the sexually uninhibited and wantonly promiscuous inner-city
blacks (keeping in mind that, because of welfare benefits, the more
kids they have the better off they are financially)? What's wrong with
not wanting to suffer the aberrant social behavior of, and refusing to
be economically enslaved by, large other-racial groups in the greater
society?
If you are a little concerned about the disproportionate crime rates
of non-White minorities today, what do you suppose it will be like
when those groups comprise the majority of our population? And how
will that affect your grandchildren? What's wrong with your being a
little upset when some AIDS-infected minority criminal on parole rapes
your daughter or granddaughter? Do you ever wonder why so much
sensationalistic, front-page attention is given in the press to white-
on-black crime while black-on-white crime is either ignored, buried in
the middle of the newspaper, or reported without identifying the races
involved? Even though black-on-white crime is so much more prevalent
(almost to the exclusion of comparatively non-existent white-on-black
crime) and in spite of the fact that whites outnumber blacks by more
than eight-to-one in our society? And did you know that blacks are
nearly 50 times more likely than Whites to commit violent crimes?
If you are worried about the dangerous blackboard jungles so many of
our schools have become, and the poor quality of dumbed-down public
education in many parts of the country now, what do you expect it will
be like in another 10 or 20 years? Do you really appreciate the fact
that many of the things your children are being taught in the public
schools these days, especially in the historical, social, and
political areas; are slanted propaganda, half-truths, and even
deliberate lies designed to convey an anti-White or at best a White-
debasing message that is essentially a form of brainwashing? Or the
way the schools constantly and artificially ennoble and glorify people
of color in comparison to we cruel, exploitative Whites? Do you really
want more time and public resources spent on bi-lingual education,
signage, packaging, and perhaps air-traffic control procedures?
If you are tired of the sick perversions endlessly flaunted on
television and in movies now, and the anti-social and pornographic
lyrics, savage beat, and animalistic nature of "rap," "hip-hop," and
other so-called music being produced and sold to our children now;
what do you think our popular culture will look like in another few
years? Considering that Negroes make up just about 13% of the
population, what's wrong with wondering why about 30% or more of the
faces we see in so many movies, TV programs and commercials, and in
print ads, are black? And why most of them are depicted as authority
figures, supervisors, scientists, mentors, and the smartest and most
sensitive characters compared with whites (even though we know that's
just not the way it is in the real world, for very real natural
reasons)? And why the black male is so closely paired with the
attractive White female? And why, in kids' clothing ads, the black boy
is usually coupled somehow with the little blonde girl? Do you really
think that is just racially-neutral coincidence, or because that just
reflects the natural way things really are? Or could it be that
someone has purposely calculated, for some socio/political agenda,
that that's the way people should be conditioned to perceive things;
to be subtly convinced that's the way things should be in our society?
Instead of just lowering your head and agreeing that all anti-Semitism
is necessarily a bad thing, has it ever occurred to you to take a
closer look at the Jews' role in getting America into World Wars I and
II, the Iraq wars, and the so-called War on Terrorism which have
killed so many thousands of our young men, by far the most of them
White men? Have you ever wondered why the Jew-dominated media and
entertainment industries so consistently and tirelessly promote such
socially critical, culture-distorting, gender- and generational-
divisive, and White family-disruptive things as: militant feminism,
White-male bashing, acceptance of homosexuality and the so-called gay
lifestyle (as merely an alternative lifestyle choice), teenage
sexuality, and premature teenage self-determination that is tantamount
to rebellion against their establishment parents? Not to mention all
the sexual innuendo, scatological humor, and so-called soft porn on TV
and in the movies? And the racial mixing in all manner of social
situations, Negroid music, Negroid and Mexican language corruptions
(slang, street-talk), and Negroid and Mexican clothing styles?
If you wonder how it came to be that so many of our largest, once-
great cities have become bankrupt human cesspools that are literally
off limits to you, your family, and people of your kind, how long do
you think it will be before the same thing happens to the few decent
cities we have left and even to our mid-sized and smaller communities?
(What's that you say? You think that is an exaggeration? Well, when
was the last time you dared to get off the freeway with your wife and
kids in the car and just drive around East St. Louis or Los Angeles
without giving very careful consideration to what part of town you
were in?)
What's wrong with having and enjoying the basic human right of freedom
of association (and non-association)? What's wrong with wanting to
live in our own communities -- communities comprised of people like
ourselves -- of people who more-or-less look like us and think and
behave like us, who share many elements of our history and traditions,
have the same cultural heritage as us, and enjoy and appreciate the
same things we do?
How can we Whites possibly continue to allow the press, our
government, and the schools to tell our children the out-and-out lie
that "diversity is our greatest strength," when it is an established
fact that just about every truly great civilization the world has ever
known declined and then died out largely as a result of race-mixing?
And when it is so obviously and painfully true that, primarily due to
the relative increase of the non-White populations in our society,
large parts of our beloved America have already been ruined -- have
become crime-infested, unlivable hellholes since about the 1950s?
Just maybe, if we can bring ourselves to truthfully and rationally
analyze issues such as the above, and if at the same time we can stop
and then reverse the deadly tendencies of deracination and self-hatred
which have become so prevalent in recent years (which have been
drummed into our heads for so many years by those who are working to
destroy the White race), and then act in our own self interest based
on racial awareness and pride; we can still assure a beautiful future
for our grandchildren and their children.
Topaz
<loj...@lojban.org> wrote:
>>There is no evolution when everyone is provided with food stamps.
>
>Of course there is. There is no way to STOP evolution, since
>mutations happen.
Mutations are usually negative. Evolutionary progress was made by
survival of the fittest.
>
>>Not
>>that there is anything wrong with food stamps. Survival of the fittest
>>was evolution,
>
>No. Survival of the fittest is a slogan that represents an
>oversimplified version of ONE ASPECT of evolution. Even with that
>correction, "fittest" almost certain means something other than what
>you are presuming that it means.
Long ago "fittest" had a sensible meaning. Today it might mean that
the fat cat bankers are the fittest, another reason evolutionary
progress is not happening now.
Far from being "evil," eugenics is actually the most beneficial and
humane discipline ever devised by the mind of man. In fact, eugenics
is the only viable long-term solution to all our social problems. As
I said on this program in 1993, eugenics is the only way to a better
world. Science has shown us that genetic structure is by far the
greatest determinant of intelligence, character, and behavior.
Unfortunately, those with the best genetic inheritance tend to have
the fewest children-and those with the lowest intelligence,
lowest potential, and worst character tend to have the most
children. This leads to a genetic deterioration of the race that
gets worse with each passing generation. No amount of education, no
laws, and no increase in the power of the police or of the state can
counter this degeneration.
Eugenics is simply the idea that we should humanely use our social
policies to encourage as much as possible the birth of children with
good genetic qualities and to discourage as much as possible the
birth of children with poor genetic qualities. Some of this could be
done with the more advanced techniques of modern reproductive
science, such as allowing surrogate mothers to carry genius-level
children in large numbers or encouraging the voluntary use of egg
banks and sperm banks to propagate the best children that our race
can possibly produce.
But most eugenics would be simple and basic and just good common
Sense. There could be endless variations on the theme of tax
deductions, tax credits, and interest-free loans extended to
families of good genetic inheritance to encourage them to give the
priceless gift of their children-most of whom will grow up into
highly-evolved creative problem-solvers-to our society. How can
that be "evil"?
It's not evil. It's really the ultimate good. After a few
generations of eugenics-after a few generations of ten times the
number of problem-solvers and culture-creators being born, and a
tenth of the number of problem-makers and culture destroyers being
born, we would have a very different world indeed. An infinitely
better world.
Topaz
wrote:
>> We should base policies on truth not falsehood. The truth is that
>> Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks.
>
>By what standards?
"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
the Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/
Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.
He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.
He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the
Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech
and hear it for yourself.."
Tommy
>The results depend on the kind of intelligence test, and the similarity of
>education and living conditions.
>The very poor and illiterate will not do so well in most intelligence tests,
>whatever their race.
>
>Given the same conditions, race will not make any difference.
>Look at America and Britain, where blacks and whites now have equal
>opportunities.
>
Who's to Blame for the Affirmative Action Fiasco?
By Hugh Murray
Searching for employment in the late 19th century, many Irish
immigrants in America encountered the sign, "NINA" (No Irish Need
Apply). Today, their descendants face much the same discrimination. Of
course, now, it is not limited to the Irish - for in America men are
routinely denied jobs, promotions, contracts and scholarships because
they are of Irish, Italian, English, German or general European
heritage. Worse, not only is this discrimination government sponsored,
it is performed in the name of "Equal Opportunity." How did this come
about? Why do the media prefer to ignore it? Who fostered this
discrimination against white men?
In high school a white boy may be denied entrance into special
programs because he is not a preferred minority; or, in some cases, he
may be denied because he is not a girl. There are scholarships
available, but many cannot be awarded to a white male (for example,
Bill Gates of Microsoft was recently lauded by the media for
establishing a billion-dollar scholarship program - one in which
recipients are restricted to blacks only.) When the teen applies to
university, the administration will admit "basically qualified"
minorities, but reject better-qualified whites. When applying for
jobs, the same discrimination occurs. If the teen finds employment,
special, on-the-job training for promotion may be denied him as it is
reserved for minorities, even if they are lesser qualified and have
been on the job a shorter period of time. Once hired, he may be
required to attend "diversity training" sessions, in which he is
supposed to confess his alleged guilt of racism and sexism.
How did this systematic discrimination arise?
What did it mean to forbid discrimination? From the early days of the
20th century through 1964, most liberals were clear as to what this
meant-show no bias against or preference for a person because of his
race, sex, religion etc. This was the dominant view. But in the debate
over the civil rights bill in 1964 some opponents declared that if
passed, it would lead to, among other things: racial quotas and racial
balance in the workplace, preferences for blacks over whites in
employment, promotion, bank loans etc.
But, in Congress, the debate went otherwise. No senator who favored
the civil rights bill spoke up for quotas, "positive integration,"
racial balance or preferences for minorities above whites. Quite the
contrary.
How then did a law which promised to end discrimination by outlawing
discrimination against any individual, a law that promised preferences
for no group, which agreed to retain testing to reject unqualified
applicants-how was this law subverted into its opposite? Here the role
of Alfred Blumrosen is crucial. Blumrosen was among the zealots
working for the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission who did not
want the agency to function as created.
Alfred Blumrosen was instrumental in this and other shifts. He was a
professor at Rutgers University who became the EEOC's liaison chief
for federal, state and local agencies, and he admitted that his
"creative" reading of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was "contrary to
the plain meaning." But why worry? By 1965 when the Bank of America
instituted quota hiring under a euphemism, "the standard refrain of
the EEO bureaucracies, [was that] affirmative action [AA] had nothing
to do with racial quotas. That was illegal." Unfortunately, that
deceptive refrain is still heard today.
The goal of Sonia Pressman, another ideologue in the EEOC, was "to
document large disparities in employment patterns, [so] that
discriminatory intent might legally be inferred." ...the EEOC sought
to impose quotas while not calling them such because quotas were
clearly illegal. The agency sought to break the law.
Blumrosen and Pressman pushed the EEOC to defy the Civil Rights Act of
1964 by imposing quotas, demanding racial balance in the workplace and
giving preferences to blacks over whites. Essential to the Blumrosen-
Pressman campaign was the collection of statistics to show "disparate
impact," how minorities were underutilized, employed in a smaller
proportion in various occupations to their numbers in the general
population.
Blumrosen was set upon "selectively enforcing" the civil rights act by
using disparate impact theory and proportional representation only
when it affected others. (More accurately, Blumrosen was "selectively
malenforcing" the civil rights law, imposing quotas for
underrepresented blacks, using quotas to curb whites; for women,
against men; but never for gentiles and against Jews.)
Of course, had the EEOC sought to restrict Jews as it has white men,
the storm of protest would have cast "disparate impact" theory into
the dustbin of history. Thus, the role of Blumrosen and his allies in
the media, academia etc., was to create a false target - the
"overrepresented," "privileged" and "oppressive" white male. According
to the EEOC, the statistics proved just that. However, the statistics
proved otherwise. The partial statistics used by Blumrosen were simply
the effort to deflect criticism to another group instead of the one
most overrepresented, privileged and oppressive - his own.
By not asking the religious question on the EEOC questionnaires, the
EEOC created a scapegoat of the white male. Once smeared as
"privileged" and "oppressive," the non-privileged, working-class and
poor whites began to pay the price for the "moral" system of
affirmative action by being legally discriminated against and denied
equal opportunity.
The proportional test, the liberals' test of all tests, when applied
to the religious clause of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, shows Jews to
be the most privileged and oppressive of people in America. The fav-
orite test of liberals reveals white men to be less privileged than
the Jews. Why does not The New York Times, the EEOC, NBC, CBS or ABC
report that statistic? The media remain silent on the issue of Jewish
privilege while simultaneously exposing every time white men are
somewhat overrepresented. Why the silence regarding Jews? A glance at
the ownership of the media just might have something to do with this
disparity in exposing "privilege." And if any individual in the media
dared to expose some Jewish privilege, there would be a thunderous
assault upon that individual's "bigotry." However, daily, reporters
write of white male privilege, but almost no one denounces this anti-
white bigotry.
Once smeared as privileged, the non-privileged middle-class, working-
class, and poor whites pay for the "moral" system of AA by being
legally discriminated against and denied equal opportunity. But then
the history of America since the 1960s is often the record of wealthy
liberals using the law to curb and oppress blue-collar whites, because
the blue-collar folk are deemed privileged, prejudiced and provincial.
Therefore, such blue-collar whites deserve to be passed over in
scholarships, jobs and promotions; the blue-collar crowd should be
shunted aside, and instead the "pets" of the elite should be elevated:
the children of illegal immigrants, of wealthy minorities and the
daughters of rich liberals. And this is done in the name of morality,
fairness, and justice.
In summary, the great hoax concocted by Blumrosen and his
collaborators in the media, academy, and government is "white male
privilege." Most white men are not privileged. Those who are, often
support AA because it is no loss to them - their children will not
require a scholarship, an entry-level job, a position as policeman or
fireman, or a promotion. It is the poor and middle-class whites who,
denied equal opportunity, must pay with thinning wallets and shrunken
dreams for the "morality of diversity" imposed by the wealthy, liberal
elite.
Even if every CEO in America were a white male, that would be no
reason to discriminate against a poor, white teenage boy seeking a
scholarship and give it to a lesser qualified girl or minority. "White
male privilege" is a social construct created by liberals. They have
used their power in government, media, and academia to deny equal
opportunity to white men, to undermine and stigmatize America's
working class, and to immobilize with guilt the white middle class.
America does not suffer from white male privilege and oppression; it
staggers beneath Jewish privilege and oppression.
Excerpted from article found at:
http://www.barnesreview.org/Nov__Dec_2001/Who_s_to_Blame_for_the_Affirma/wh
o_s_to_blame_for_the_affirma.html
Topaz
wrote:
>
>Of course. They have lived for centuries much further North.
>They are light skinned for the same reason Northern Europeans are lighter
>skinned than Mediterranean people, and both are lighter than Africans.
>Lighter skin is more suitable in places with lower light levels.
>
>
>> All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
>> intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
>> important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
>> the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
>> are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
>>
>
>Usually 'whites' have designed the intelligence tests, for people educated
>by white society.
>It's a matter of culture, not race.
>
Whites make the tests, make the colleges and universities, and make
everything else:
Thank White people for:
- that computer you're typing on
- the software that drives it
- recorded music
- motion pictures
- tv
- radio
- camera
- telephone
- light bulb
- the automobile
- rocketry
- satellites
- spacecraft
- airplanes
- skyscrapers
- metallurgy (most discoveries)
- materials science (plastics, compounds, & most other synthetics)
- 95% of medical advancements
- 95% of life saving pharmaceutical drugs
- most scientific breakthroughs over the past 1000 years
- the bulk of mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology
- discovery of DNA
- laser technology and it's myriad of uses
- harnessing electricity
- nuclear energy
- wireless technology
- air conditioning devices
- refrigeration
- modern agricultural techniques
Where would the world be without White people? Stuck in the stone
age, that's where.
So the next time you get in your car, pick up your cell phone, fly a
plane, etc. thank White people.
jimj
Topaz
wrote:
>
>Adolf was a clueless fool. The German Jews were the brains of Germany, and
>could have won him the war if given the chance.
Jews were and are enemies of Germans, and all White people.
"The 1950s-1960s civil-rights movement might go unnoticed by many
White citizens if it were not for the fact that that movement was
created and steered by Jews, not by Blacks. Indeed, the NAACP was
founded by and run for many years by Jews, such as the Spingarn
brothers. Other key Jews in the NAACP included Henry Moskowitz,
Lillian Wald, Jack Greenberg and Kivie Kaplan.
The groundbreaking Brown v. Board of Education court ruling in 1954
resulted almost entirely from the work of Jewish lawyers connected
with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, for example Jack Greenberg. Indeed,
the legal brief for the Brown case was signed almost exclusively by
Jews. Jewish activist Esther Swirk Brown was also a prime player in
the Brown case. In fact, Swirk Brown actually launched the Brown case
herself [3].
Furthermore, the constitutionally questionable U.S. Civil Rights Act
of 1964 came from a Jew, i.e., Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
7152. That act created, among other things, affirmative action. It
ended the practice of business owners deciding for themselves whom to
hire and fire. In fact, the destruction of White rights in America was
caused largely by the Jewish-created/led civil-rights movement.
The civil-rights movement also transformed the attitudes of American
Blacks: before the civil-rights movement Blacks were largely
respectful of Whites. Today Blacks openly denigrate White culture and
challenge White authority. They demand that 'whitey' now show them
respect which they may or may not have earned...
Jews have also led the movement in the U.S. Congress to open America
to non-European immigration. The best example of that is the 1965
Immigration Act, aka the Hart-Celler Act, which resulted in a
revolutionary change in U.S. immigration rules. Congressman Emanuel
Celler was the point man for that law, even though he is listed
second, after Hart, in the title 'Hart-Celler.' Indeed, President
Johnson mentioned Celler twice at the signing of the bill - H.R. 2580
into law on Oct. 3, 1965 but did not mention Hart. Other Jews in
Congress also spearheaded the movement to allow more non-Europeans
into America, such as Jacob Javits and Herbert Lehman. And an
influential Jewish immigration lawyer named Edward Dubroff regularly
advised Congressman Celler about immigration issues.
Additionally, powerful Jewish organizations carried out intense,
ongoing campaigns in order to pressure individual Congressmen to vote
for the loosening of U.S. immigration laws. At nearly every step of
the campaign to alter U.S. immigration laws, Jews were at the
forefront....
The controversial 1951 UN/UNESCO 'Statement on the Nature of Race and
Race Differences,' which denied many human racial differences, was
largely the invention of infamous Jewish anthropologist Ashley
Montagu. Here we see the doggedness of the Jewish agenda on race, for
as far back as 1935, Franz Boas - the Jewish godfather of race-denial
who inspired Montagu's efforts - approached two top scientists and
asked them to create an anti-racism/race-denial statement, which would
be signed by many other scientists and then publicized. Both of the
scientists that Boas approached - anthropologist and psychologist
Livingston Farrand and biologist Raymond Pearl - turned Boas down. Not
one to give up easily, Boas then approached yet another race expert,
anthropologist Earnest Hooton. Hooton agreed to create such a race
statement (he sent it to seven top scientists but only one signed
it)...
Other top experts who created race-denying/race-downplaying material
for the UN or UNESCO were also Jewish, including Melville Herskovits,
Otto Klineberg and Harry Shapiro. In fact, Jews virtually pioneered
the questionable-but-now-common 'official' theory that racial
differences between Whites and non-Whites do not really exist. The
teachings of the Jews mentioned above were used to drastically alter
Western culture, e.g. in arguing for the enactment of civil-rights
legislation...
The American political Left was built largely by Jews. For example,
Jewish Frankfurt School icon Herbert Marcuse laid the foundation for
the American 'hippie' counterculture via his popular book
"One-Dimensional Man" (1964). Other famous Jews who led the 1960s
hippie movement included Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and Paul Krassner.
Lesser Jews drove the counterculture movement behind-the-scenes by
publishing, writing for or editing leftist newspapers and magazines.
Anti-war and college activism groups were disproportionately filled
with Jews, for example Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), whose
top leaders were Jewish, e.g. Todd Gitlin, Mike Spiegel, Al Haber, and
Mike Klonsky.
Most of the leaders of the feminist movement were Jews as well, for
example Betty Friedan, Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Lucy Komisar and Gloria
Steinem. Most of the leaders of the homosexual-rights movement have
been Jewish, too, such as Larry Kramer, Alan Klein and Arnie
Kantrowitz. Gun-control actions in the U.S. Congress have also been
dominated by Jews, such as Charles Schumer, Diane Feinstein and Howard
Metzenbaum. Jews created two landmark anti-gun laws in the 1990s: the
Brady law, which came from Howard Metzenbaum and Charles Schumer, and
the assault-rifle-ban law, which came from Dianne Feinstein and
Schumer. In fact, America's first significant anti-gun legislation,
the Gun Control Act of 1968, came from Congressman Emanuel Celler's
House bill H.R. 17735.
Even the famous Woodstock rock-and-roll concert in 1969 - which was a
noteworthy counterculture event - was created by Jews: Michael Lang,
Artie Kornfeld, Joel Rosenman and John Roberts.
Jews guided almost every step of the American counterculture movement.
THE GROWTH OF HOLLYWOOD/THE U.S. MEDIA
Of major importance to America's culture is that the Hollywood film
community and the American media as well are dominated by Jews.
Indeed, Jews founded the major Hollywood movie studios, e.g. Carl
Laemmle (Universal Pictures), William Fox (Fox Film Corp.), Louis B.
Mayer (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer) and Adolph Zukor (Paramount Pictures).
Some of the more well-known Jews in modern Hollywood and the media
include film directors Steven Spielberg and Woody Allen, the Disney
Co.'s Michael Eisner, actors Dustin Hoffman and Kirk Douglas,
comedians Milton Berle and Don Rickles and news journalists Mike
Wallace, Barbara Walters and Ted Koppel (more information about Jews,
Hollywood and the media can be found in the essay "Who Rules America?"
by National Vanguard Books, available on the web or in their book
catalogue).
As the 1960s hippie revolution was occurring, another revolution of
sorts was happening in Hollywood. Jewish network executives began to
churn out movies and TV shows featuring Black actors in leading roles.
Hollywood also produced a notorious movie - starring well-known actors
- that featured an interracial relationship. It seemed that the Jews
in Hollywood, believing that the pro-White attitudes of America's
Founders would never return, became much bolder during the 1960s.
(Regarding America's Founders, a law created in the Founders' era,
'Act of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104),' stated that only Whites
could become American citizens. In fact, non-Whites had no significant
rights in America until the XV Amendment was created in 1870).
As America entered the 1970s it became common for Americans to see
Blacks, Jews and even Asians in prominent vocations on TV shows and in
movies. Those minorities were now seen portraying judges, police
detectives and attorneys across large and small screens all over the
U.S.
Non-Hollywood media also flourished in America from the 1960s onward.
The news departments at most broadcasting companies were run by, or
heavily staffed by, Jews. Major U.S. newspapers also came under Jewish
control as small newspapers were bought out by big media conglomerates
which were dominated by Jews. Furthermore, as American culture was
being socially 'Jewified,' so were the cultures of other Western
countries being similarly Jewified via American movies and TV shows,
which became popular in many countries. America served as a base of
sorts for the exporting of Jewish-created movies and TV shows which
featured leftist and politically-correct messages, which served
various Jewish social objectives...
SUMMARY
The information above shows that the impact that Jews have had upon
the world and especially upon the West since 1776 is remarkable.
Important questions arise from the impact of the Jews: without their
actions, would WWII have occurred? Would America have had a 50-year
Cold War with the Soviet Union? Would the Soviet Union have even
existed in the first place? Would the Vietnam War have occurred? Would
America be as politically liberal as it is today? Those are questions
for Westerners to ponder at length.
Even more remarkable is how the Western public never hears about the
influence of the Jews upon their cultures. Words such as 'leftist'..
in the West but never the word 'Jew.' We suggest that the lack of
mention of the Jews in Western societies is itself mute testimony to
the tremendous power of the Jews. By using a) frequent mentions of the
Holocaust; b) the media; c) Hollywood; d) large amounts of money; and
e) significant political influence, Jews have rebuilt the West to
their ends. Gentiles who complain about that Jewish rebuilding - and
their own dispossession as a result - are labeled 'anti-Semitic' and
marginalized into ineffectiveness. Such Jewish behavior as outlined
above is, again, not a plot by Jews but is instead inborn, proactive
behavior which supposedly helps to offset the chance that Jews will be
oppressed again, or be expelled from Western countries (Jews have been
expelled from most Western countries at one time or another)...."
LIGHT FOR NATIONS:
A Short History of the Jews in the Modern World
>
>Jesus was handed to the Romans because Pilate had the power to crucify him,
>which the Jews hadn't.
>Their argument was that if Pilate let him go, he was no friend of Caesar,
>which Pilate couldn't ignore, although he washed his hands of it.
>
>Jesus objected to the too strict observance of the law, especially the
>Sabbath and the treatment of a woman taken in adultery.
>He also caused a disturbance in the Temple by objecting to the money
>changers and those who sold doves for sacrifice, who were making it a den of
>thieves.
>
>The Scribes and Pharisees didn't like his teachings in some respects. But
>there is no reason to think he was against the Law and traditions of his
>people in general. He would have been like a somewhat unorthodox rabbi.
>And he called himself the Son of Man, not the Son of God.
>(Read the Sermon on the Mount. Google it for various commentaries.)
>
>Whether you believe in the Virgin Birth or not, there is no need to insult a
>very good woman. Where on earth did Adolf get that ridiculous idea? Mary
>must have been an incredibly strong person. How many of us today could stand
>by a cross and watch our child die?
>
>We can laugh at Adolf's stupidity these days. But unfortunately many Germans
>believed him, with tragic consequences.
>
In the good old days a man could afford children and his wife didn't
have to work. The biggest problem in schools was gum chewing. But it
was more than that. It was the entire culture. Look in the old movies
and you can see it. Men were men. Women were women. And everybody was
White.
Look at America now. There are non-Whites everywhere. Anyone can
see Black neighborhoods and not safe and not where you want to live.
America is slowly turning into a third world country.
The National Socialists were fighting for the good old days. They
were fighting for civilization.
The Jews make the movies and control the media. Now you can hardly
go to the movies without seeing race-mixing and feminism. Hopefully
the world will not continue to go down the tubes forever. If we stop
the Jews from controlling the media and society we can be on the path
back to the good old days.
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."
George Plimpton
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:36:05 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
> <loj...@lojban.org> wrote:
>
>
>>> There is no evolution when everyone is provided with food stamps.
>>
>> Of course there is. There is no way to STOP evolution, since
>> mutations happen.
>
> Mutations are usually negative. Evolutionary progress was made by
> survival of the fittest.
That fitness was due to mutations, fuckwit.
Geopelia
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:12:48 +1200, "Geopelia" <phil...@xtra.co.nz>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Adolf was a clueless fool. The German Jews were the brains of Germany, and
>>could have won him the war if given the chance.
>
> Jews were and are enemies of Germans, and all White people.
>
> influence of the Jews upon their cultures. Words such as 'leftist'..
> in the West but never the word 'Jew.' We suggest that the lack of
> mention of the Jews in Western societies is itself mute testimony to
> the tremendous power of the Jews. By using a) frequent mentions of the
> Holocaust; b) the media; c) Hollywood; d) large amounts of money; and
> e) significant political influence, Jews have rebuilt the West to
> their ends. Gentiles who complain about that Jewish rebuilding - and
> their own dispossession as a result - are labeled 'anti-Semitic' and
> marginalized into ineffectiveness. Such Jewish behavior as outlined
> above is, again, not a plot by Jews but is instead inborn, proactive
> behavior which supposedly helps to offset the chance that Jews will be
> oppressed again, or be expelled from Western countries (Jews have been
> expelled from most Western countries at one time or another)...."
(Snipped some for length)
I don't know much about American politics. I was born and educated in
England, and now live in New Zealand.
Back in London, there were a large number of Jews around our way. We all
got on very well together.
All the races in New Zealand seem to get on very well together, too. Take a
look at the sports teams.
And in America, many of your athletes are black.
> In the good old days a man could afford children and his wife didn't
> have to work. The biggest problem in schools was gum chewing. But it
> was more than that. It was the entire culture. Look in the old movies
> and you can see it. Men were men. Women were women. And everybody was
> White.
Yes, just look at the movies of the thirties. Most women were shown as
glamorous and rather brainless dolls.
Black folks were usually servants, and Red Indians were usually the villains
of the old "Cowboys and Indians" films.
Would you seriously want that kind of culture?
> Look at America now. There are non-Whites everywhere. Anyone can
> see Black neighborhoods and not safe and not where you want to live.
> America is slowly turning into a third world country.
>
> The National Socialists were fighting for the good old days. They
> were fighting for civilization.
Good gracious! Are you serious?
What were you doing in World War Two? Which side would you have been on, if
you were too young then?
What kind of civilization would we have now, if Hitler had won? As
Churchill said, it would have been a new Dark Age.
> The Jews make the movies and control the media. Now you can hardly
> go to the movies without seeing race-mixing and feminism. Hopefully
> the world will not continue to go down the tubes forever. If we stop
> the Jews from controlling the media and society we can be on the path
> back to the good old days.
People work in those fields because they happen to be good at those kind of
jobs.
Do you seriously think it is some kind of Jewish conspiracy?
And what is wrong with "race mixing and feminism" in the movies? It's all
around us in the real world.
> Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
>
> "Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
> secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
> tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
> gradually to control public life in its entirety."
Unless people want to read certain newspapers, the circulation will drop and
the paper will fail.
Nobody has to read a paper they don't agree with, in free countries.
But I suppose Adolf meant in Germany. I wouldn't know. But Goebbels filled
the wartime German media with Nazi propaganda.
Would intelligent Germans have been taken in by that?
(Britain did have a Ministry of Information, but that was just to censor
anything of value to the enemy.)
Michael Ejercito
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:24:41 +1200, "Geopelia" <phildo...@xtra.co.nz>
Michael