Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

No one here but us chickens...

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Gulag

unread,
May 21, 2002, 8:07:55 PM5/21/02
to
Is this guy ever going to release a new book and get this group posting
again?!

Gulag


Martin Lewis

unread,
May 22, 2002, 2:39:53 PM5/22/02
to
"Gulag" <spira...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wjBG8.15107$e5.1...@news.indigo.ie...

> Is this guy ever going to release a new book and get this group posting
> again?!

How about a thread about the slightly rubbish cover art?

http://www.timewarnerbooks.co.uk/covers/large/0316860557.jpg

Martin


Sebastiaan

unread,
May 22, 2002, 3:14:47 PM5/22/02
to
What happened to the famous black and white covers? Surely this is not the
UK edition? Have I been painstakingly collecting UK editions only to have
this in my bookcase now ;-)

~sebastiaan~
Martin Lewis <mar...@theculture.org> wrote in message
news:x_RG8.757$o%.83017@news8-gui.server.ntli.net...

Ross Fraser

unread,
May 22, 2002, 8:17:51 PM5/22/02
to

"Martin Lewis" <mar...@theculture.org> wrote in message
news:x_RG8.757$o%.83017@news8-gui.server.ntli.net...

Hmm, have you seen the cover that Amazon.co.uk have?

http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0316860549.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg


Jez

unread,
May 22, 2002, 10:15:57 PM5/22/02
to

"Ross Fraser" <ro...@ebffsenfre.pb.hx> wrote in message
news:3cec3531$0$8514$cc9e...@news.dial.pipex.com...

>
> "Martin Lewis" <mar...@theculture.org> wrote in message
> news:x_RG8.757$o%.83017@news8-gui.server.ntli.net...

> > How about a thread about the slightly rubbish cover art?

Surely these are just conceptual images, unless Peter Brown (the guy who did
all the striking black and white covers), has ended his contract. Anyhow,
I'm sure Iain Banks wouldn't go for a mug shot on the front cover!
--
Jez


Adrian Tupper

unread,
May 23, 2002, 3:02:22 AM5/23/02
to

"Ross Fraser" <ro...@ebffsenfre.pb.hx> wrote in message
news:3cec3531$0$8514$cc9e...@news.dial.pipex.com...
>

Surely not!!! That'll most likely be some sort of promotional poster. The
"Iain Banks will be signing his new novel...." type.

As for the first pic, is anyone else reminded of Pink Floyd?

--
Adrian


Magnus Paterson

unread,
May 23, 2002, 3:56:26 AM5/23/02
to

"Martin Lewis" wrote:
>
> > Is this guy ever going to release a new book and get this group posting
> > again?!
>
> How about a thread about the slightly rubbish cover art?
>
> http://www.timewarnerbooks.co.uk/covers/large/0316860557.jpg
>

A bit iffy that. With the twin chimneys and the 'plane, it
looks like an allusion to the WTC.

Magnus


Daniel

unread,
May 23, 2002, 4:23:45 AM5/23/02
to

"Magnus Paterson" <m...@roe.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:aci7bb$ena$1...@scotsman.ed.ac.uk...

Since that's what the book is about, it's not an unreasonable allusion.

--
Daniel.


Daniel

unread,
May 23, 2002, 4:24:24 AM5/23/02
to

"Adrian Tupper" <hsb...@hg22.btclick.com> wrote in message
news:rw0H8.148942$oK4.127636@NewsReader...
> > > http://www.timewarnerbooks.co.uk/covers/large/0316860557.jpg

> > http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0316860549.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
>
> Surely not!!! That'll most likely be some sort of promotional poster.
The
> "Iain Banks will be signing his new novel...." type.
>
> As for the first pic, is anyone else reminded of Pink Floyd?

The typeface and layout is reminiscent of Ian McEwan's books.

--
Daniel.


Rich

unread,
May 23, 2002, 4:38:55 AM5/23/02
to
I thought that the entire book was a bit like that, I seem to remember a thread
about that a while back? Can't wait to have a read myself, though I admit I
would be even more excited at the prospect of a culture novel.
Rich

Magnus Paterson wrote:

--
"If its not deep enough to cartwheel it's not a proper river"


Magnus Paterson

unread,
May 23, 2002, 5:40:24 AM5/23/02
to

"Daniel" <dan...@teletext.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aci8rv$ppcjj$1...@ID-126045.news.dfncis.de...

Ouch! That'll teach me to pay attention.

Magnus

>
> --
> Daniel.
>
>


Marc Dionne

unread,
May 23, 2002, 3:58:18 PM5/23/02
to
In article <x_RG8.757$o%.83017@news8-gui.server.ntli.net>, Martin Lewis
<mar...@theculture.org> wrote:

This is really not so bad. Nothing like the indescribably ghastly cover
on the US ed of _Look to Windward_, which I'm sure you've all seen, but
which I'll link to anyway, in case your retinas don't get enough
punishment in the course of a day.

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0743421914.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

--
Marc Dionne, Ph.D. | dio...@stanford.edu | (650) 724-8064
Schneider lab, Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University

Halmyre

unread,
May 24, 2002, 4:15:34 AM5/24/02
to
Marc Dionne <dio...@stanford.edu> wrote in message news:<230520021258182271%dio...@stanford.edu>...
<snip>

> This is really not so bad. Nothing like the indescribably ghastly cover
> on the US ed of _Look to Windward_, which I'm sure you've all seen, but
> which I'll link to anyway, in case your retinas don't get enough
> punishment in the course of a day.
>
> http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0743421914.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Yeeuch, looks like an L Ron Hubbard cover.

Halmyre

Marc Dionne

unread,
May 24, 2002, 11:13:12 AM5/24/02
to
In article <250f136c.02052...@posting.google.com>, Halmyre
<rob...@halmyre.abel.co.uk> wrote:

Actually, it's worse than that. The picture on the cover is really
amateurish in execution, to an extent which fails to come through in
the jpg. It's embarrassing. It looks like they decided to save money by
canning the graphic designer _and_ the artist, and turning the whole
thing over to the editor's 13-year-old son.

Rob Knell

unread,
May 25, 2002, 7:46:49 AM5/25/02
to
On Thu, 23 May 2002 09:23:45 +0100, "Daniel" <dan...@teletext.co.uk>
wrote:


>>
>> A bit iffy that. With the twin chimneys and the 'plane, it
>> looks like an allusion to the WTC.
>>
>> Magnus
>>
>
>Since that's what the book is about, it's not an unreasonable allusion.
>
>--

Hmm. Don't think any terrorist would bother crashing a jet into
Battersea Power Station (which is where those chimneys are). That
would hardly bring the Western Imperialists to their knees. Maybe if
it was a terrorist who had a thing about early Pink Floyd publicity
stunts...

Rob Knell

Ginnie Redston

unread,
May 25, 2002, 8:58:19 AM5/25/02
to

"Marc Dionne" <dio...@stanford.edu> wrote in message
news:240520020813128992%dio...@stanford.edu...

> In article <250f136c.02052...@posting.google.com>, Halmyre
> <rob...@halmyre.abel.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Marc Dionne <dio...@stanford.edu> wrote in message
> > news:<230520021258182271%dio...@stanford.edu>...
> > <snip>
> > > This is really not so bad. Nothing like the indescribably ghastly
cover
> > > on the US ed of _Look to Windward_, which I'm sure you've all seen,
but
> > > which I'll link to anyway, in case your retinas don't get enough
> > > punishment in the course of a day.
> > >
> > > http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0743421914.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
> >
> > Yeeuch, looks like an L Ron Hubbard cover.
>
> Actually, it's worse than that. The picture on the cover is really
> amateurish in execution, to an extent which fails to come through in
> the jpg. It's embarrassing. It looks like they decided to save money by
> canning the graphic designer _and_ the artist, and turning the whole
> thing over to the editor's 13-year-old son.
>
> --

Wasn't there something posted here, or perhaps in The Culture fanzine, to
the effect that the artist who did all the excellent b/w designs was going
back to Australia or something? But I thought he'd agreed to continue doing
the covers wherever he was.

Ginnie


David Cowie

unread,
May 25, 2002, 12:52:33 PM5/25/02
to
On Saturday 25 May 2002 12:44, Lionel wrote:

>
> Effing hell!
> Now I'm truly grateful that we get the British editions here in Oz.
> Why on earth do they put awful crap like that on American editions of
> paperbacks, anyway?
>
A few weeks ago I asked rec.arts.sf.written why book covers vary from
country to country. The author Lawrence Watt-Evans was kind enough to
give a detailed answer, which I reproduce for your edification. (Of
course this only tells us why the US covers are different, not why they
are crap).

<cut-and-paste from Google>


On Thu, 09 May 2002 21:42:38 +0000, David Cowie
<david_co...@lineone.net> wrote:

>I have often seen discussions here about books having different covers
>in different countries, but I don't recall anyone ever saying _why_
>this is. Some possible reasons:
>Something to do with the cover-artist's copyright.

Yes.

>Different publishers in different countries.

Yes.

>Editors and publishers wanting to mark their territory by changing
>something.

No.

>I expect that the writers and editors who post here can elaborate on
>these, and give more reasons.
>
>Note that different printings of a book within one country can have
>different covers, without even the excuse of international artists'
>copyright to fall back on.

What? No, it's still the artist's copyright that matters.

>Most records manage to keep the same cover picture through the years
>and across international borders, so why not books too? Why is it that
>the picture on the front of a CD is part of the identity of the
>product, but the picture on the front of a book is not?

No, it's because it's customary in the recording industry to buy all
rights to the cover art, and it's not traditional in publishing.

A work of art, regardless of whether it's text or a painting or a
piece of music, belongs to the creator. Publishers or record
companies buy or lease specific rights from the artists.

Publishers buy the rights to publish the book in _one_ market, in
_one_ language, because what's an American publisher going to do with
the rights to publish a book in Tagalog or Croatian?

When publishers commission cover paintings they want to spend as
little as possible, because the cover painting is not considered an
integral part of the work. They therefore buy _only_ the rights to
use the artwork on the editions they actually intend to publish, and
if the work goes out of print those rights revert to the artist. When
a publisher in another country wants to publish that book, they buy
the rights to the text from the author, and then the rights to cover
art from an artist -- there's no pre-created package deal. If they
can get the rights to the original cover painting cheaply enough,
they'll use it, but usually it's cheaper and easier to use a new
painting, or an old one they had in stock, rather than track down the
artist and negotiate with him.

In music, albums are seen as a complete package, and the record
company generally buys all rights to everything they can, just on
general principles. Music doesn't get translated, and record
companies tend to be huge international affairs, rather than limited
to one continent. Therefore, the record company generally bought the
cover art outright and can use it everywhere.

It had never occurred to me that there was anything obscure about
this, but I suppose I should have known better.

--

The Misenchanted Page: http://www.sff.net/people/LWE/ Last update
4/15/02
My latest novel is THE DRAGON SOCIETY, published by Tor.

</cut-and-paste from Google>

If you want to see the whole thread, google rec.arts.sf.written for
"why do book covers vary so much"

--
David Cowie 0 4 8 12 16 20
david_cowie @ lineone.net |---|---|---|---|---|
|
My enthusiasm has gone OFF THE SCALE! ^

Duncan Wood

unread,
May 26, 2002, 9:49:04 AM5/26/02
to

"David Cowie" <david_co...@lineone.net> wrote in message
news:acobu9$rjr3i$1...@ID-105025.news.dfncis.de...


Which is also why you see the same cover art on two different books
occasionally


David Cowie

unread,
May 26, 2002, 4:02:42 PM5/26/02
to
On Sunday 26 May 2002 13:49, Duncan Wood wrote:

<huge snip>

>
> Which is also why you see the same cover art on two different books
> occasionally

In one of the follow-up postings to this, a German poster told us that
the German editions of David Weber's "Honor Harrington" books have the
US covers, but _on different books_.

Jennifer Reinhart

unread,
May 28, 2002, 5:42:41 PM5/28/02
to
I've got a pretty horrible looking edition of "Inversions" here...a very
silly dagger in th foreground, thrust into a grassy knoll...and quite a
foppish castle toward the back, as well.

--Jenny Jo

Drink up babe, look at the stars--
I'll kiss you again, between the bars,
where I'm seeing you there,
with your hands in the air,
waiting to finally be caught.

Jennifer Reinhart

unread,
May 28, 2002, 5:45:34 PM5/28/02
to
Because we don't actually have any taste or discrimination or interest
in literature--it's more about bright colors. Kind of a like a magpie
or a raccoon.

--Jenny Jo (grumble)

Douglas Bailey

unread,
May 30, 2002, 11:46:44 AM5/30/02
to
dio...@stanford.edu wrote:
> Martin Lewis <mar...@theculture.org> wrote:

> > How about a thread about the slightly rubbish cover art?
> >
> > http://www.timewarnerbooks.co.uk/covers/large/0316860557.jpg
>

> This is really not so bad. Nothing like the indescribably ghastly cover

> on the US ed of _Look to Windward_...
>
> http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0743421914.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Hmmmm: you got me checking the UK Amazon site, which has different cover
art for _Dead Air_:

<http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0316860549.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg>

I think I prefer Martin's "slightly rubbish" version. :-)

doug

--

---------------douglas bailey (trys...@world.std.com)---------------
this week dragged past me so slowly; the days fell on their knees...
--david bowie

Sherilyn

unread,
May 30, 2002, 1:48:15 PM5/30/02
to
In message-id <MPG.17601469e...@netnews.attbi.com>,

Douglas Bailey <trys...@world.std.com> wrote:
> dio...@stanford.edu wrote:
>> Martin Lewis <mar...@theculture.org> wrote:
>
>> > How about a thread about the slightly rubbish cover art?
>> >
>> > http://www.timewarnerbooks.co.uk/covers/large/0316860557.jpg
>>
>> This is really not so bad. Nothing like the indescribably ghastly cover
>> on the US ed of _Look to Windward_...
>>
>> http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0743421914.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
>
> Hmmmm: you got me checking the UK Amazon site, which has different cover
> art for _Dead Air_:
>
> <http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0316860549.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg>
>
> I think I prefer Martin's "slightly rubbish" version. :-)
>
So do I. It appears to show an aircraft bound for (or out of) Heathrow
as seen from the foot of Battersea Power Station. I love those chimneys.
--
Sherilyn
0 new messages