Derogatory comments about Arthur

[Nathan Brown]

Just above this article there is a message containing disgusting remarks
about one of the world's greatest authors, alive or dead.

I don't regret posting them

Nathan

[john whale]

Nathan Brown <nat...@mcunix01.moray.ac.uk> wrote in article
<5d5grg$ap2$2...@panther.rmplc.co.uk>...

Obviously you have no idea how NG's work if you think that the message will
be above the article you posted. Therefore you must be a moron - a fact
easily establised by your first posting. If you don't like ACC or think he
has sold out then put your criticism in a constructive form not personal
abuse.

[Nathan Brown]

In article <01bc1227$0537d1a0$b0f4989e@john>, john...@msn.com says...

I would not say that my first posting resorted to peronal abuse. I
simply made a valid point about the work of ACC, an acronym of yours. I
believe my criticism of ACC to be entirely justified and not at all
written in a *biased* way.

I would, however, say that your comment of calling me a moron is not the
most intelligent thing to be said on a NG.

If my first posting was evidence of my being a moron then I think you are
a little too full of admiration for ACC to be unbiased.

He is, after all, only human. Like me, like you.

Freedom of speech is good,
but it only takes one to abuse it, John.