John Henry DeJong : Portrait of an Idiot Re: (OT like a mutha) Has anyone else been TOSed? What do I do?
Alex Cain
>
> Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
> back on Thu, 17 May 2001 07:17:56 GMT...
>
> > John Henry and the horse he rode in on wrote:
>
> > > I've never been in jail, Dink.
> >
> > Sure you haven't.
>
> Evidence?
Did I say you had? You're the one reading into that statement John.
>
> > > > So, I confessed to murdering two of the most popular figures
> > > > of the twentieth century.
>
> > > > According to you, that means I'm guilty, via your definition
> > > > of a "confession."
>
> > > Not my definition.
>
> > Then why did you post it? One would assume that you would still GO BY
> > IT, thus my point would stand. Are you backpedalling, John?
>
> No,
Are you quite sure about that?
>it's a point of fact that in cases where the defendant
> has confessed, the conviction rate is much higher than
> average, even if that defendant recants. Ask Barnett.
No thanks. He's too busy slapping around Pete.
>
> That has absolutely NOTHING to do with what I 'go by.'
OF course it doesn't. What you 'go by' is generally a consortium
of your delusions and paranoia.
>
> > > I'm just pointing out what any good
> > > defense attorney knows - a defendant confession is almost
> > > inpossible to overcome in open court.
>
> > And how many times have YOU been in court, John?
>
> On criminal charges? None.
Evidence?
>
> > > > > But careful about that 'I shot kennedy' stuff. There's no
> > > > > statute of limitations on murder - and stupider things have
> > > > > happened than the febbies or the SS showing up as a reasult
> > > > > of what some idiot thought was a joke when he posted it.
>
> > > > *The SS* John?!!?!
>
> > > > Wtf?!?!!?
>
> > > > Have you lost control of your senses --- again?
>
> > > Surely you've heard of the Secret Service?
>
> > I thought you were referring to the 'SS' as it related to German
> > authority
>
> See what happens when you think?
More than what happens when *you* do. Given your history and behavior
that was the first thing that came to mind.
> Only you would associate
> a german authority from WWII with current law enforcement
> associations in the US.
Given your rampaging behavior, your complete loss of mental facilities,
the descriptions of Alicia Snow, and everything else you've ever done
and are doing, and that was the first thing that came to mind. Blame
yourself, not me.
>
> YHBT.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you, John Henry DeJong. If it makes him
look like an idiot, if it doesn't make sense, and it's said by him, if
it implies in any way loss of his mental abilities --- it is a "work" or
a "troll," and you shouldn't believe otherwise.
Damn John no wonder Bogus Sting and flux both tear you a new one. It's
just oh-so-EASY to do so!
>
> > oh mentally unstable one. But if you mean the Secret
> > Service coming to arrest me for confessing to a murder that took
> > place years before I was born---you are even stupider than I first
> > thought.
>
> > > If there was a snowball's chance in hell of you having
> > > actually *been* involved, you might not be sitting here
> > > giggling about it.
>
> > Uh-huh.
>
> Fine then, Dink, I'll tell you what.
Yessssssssssss Johnny boy?
> I challenge you to
> assert your position and make a threat of violent death at
> your hand against the currently sitting president in this
> forum. Let's see if the SS is interested.
I'm not that stupid, John. YOU probably are, but I'm not.
> --
> John Henry
> http://www.net-bastard.com
Alex Cain
>
> Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
>
> > John Henry and the horse he shot and ate for food wrote:
> > >
> > > Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
> > > back on Thu, 17 May 2001 07:17:56 GMT...
> > > > Sure you haven't.
> > > Evidence?
>
> > Did I say you had? You're the one reading into that statement John.
>
> been in jail.
Yes, I did, because given your online and offline behavior, I would
assume that you have indeed been incarcerated.
> If you have evidence which supports your
> challenge, then up with it.
If I did, I'd sit on it to let you stew :)
> If you don't, then you have no
> business coming off with this 'sure you haven't' crap.
I'll say what I want, John. If you don't like me making deragatory
statements about you, that's tough. You're not one to complain as
much as you make deragatory statements about me and others.
> Don't try to play my games, Dink - it takes a mind.
Which you don't have.
>
> > > > > I'm just pointing out what any good
> > > > > defense attorney knows - a defendant confession is almost
> > > > > inpossible to overcome in open court.
>
> > > > And how many times have YOU been in court, John?
>
> > > On criminal charges? None.
>
> > Evidence?
>
> I'm an eyewitness with the best possible access to the
> relevant corroborating information.
Mentally ill people are generally hard to use in court, John.
> If you have evidence
> to the contrary, produce it.
No thanks. It's more fun to let you stew.
>
> > > Only you would associate
> > > a german authority from WWII with current law enforcement
> > > associations in the US.
>
> > Given your rampaging behavior,
>
> "Rampaging?" what, precisely, am I "rampaging" about?
Pretty much everything over the past 4 years.
>
> > your complete loss of mental facilities,
>
> And without any mental facilities whatsoever, I'm still
> able to think circles around you, as evidenced by your
> complete inability to keep up.
Awww...nice IKYWABAI.
>
> > the descriptions of Alicia Snow,
>
> Which ones?
Where she calls you a "fucked-up redneck alcoholic," or something to
that effect.
> And how are they at odds with the truth? Do
> you have evidence of this discrepancy?
I would consider Alicia a good source since you and her have actually
met.
>
> > > YHBT.
>
> > it is a "work" or
> > a "troll," and you shouldn't believe otherwise.
>
> "Trolling" is the act of posting something in order to get
> a predefined response. My predefined response that I'm
> looking for is for you to start spouting bullshit, 'proof'
> of this and that 'event' that never happened in the first
> place, whenever I post some stupid bullshit that nobody
> with a brain would believe in the first place. Because I
> like watching you make yourself look really stupid.
Nice DeJong speak of backpedalling away from my definition of DeJong.
>
> YHBT.
>
You'd like to believe that, wouldn't you?
> > > I challenge you to
> > > assert your position and make a threat of violent death at
> > > your hand against the currently sitting president in this
> > > forum. Let's see if the SS is interested.
>
> > I'm not that stupid, John. YOU probably are, but I'm not.
>
> So you concede my point: your posturing claim of firsthand
> knowledge of events that occurred over a decade before your
> born as a way to demonstrate that the federal government
> has no interest in the rantings and ravings of net.kooks
> like you is meaningless.
No, it's not, John.
> Your fear of the government
> reading and responding to your words proves my original
> position on this point, which you disputed. Thanks.
There is no 'fear' involved John. I'm just not as stupid as you.
Alex Cain
>
> Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
>
> > > You questioned the veracity of my assertion that I have not
> > > been in jail.
>
> > Yes, I did, because given your online and offline behavior, I would
> > assume that you have indeed been incarcerated.
>
> idiot.
Oh I think I can fill in the blanks.
> The fact that you think you do belies your
> obsession and clear difficulty in percieving reality.
When are you going to get off this 'obsession' kick of yours John? First
it was because my .sig made you look like the schoolyard bully and a
mental nutcase and now it's because I think that in real life you're a
loser. Does EVERYTHING associate through your paranoia schizohrenia or
just a few certain things?
>
> You know how to tell the best lies, Dink?
Let you or Chad say them?
> Tell the whole
> truth except for one little bit. The thing about my
> daughter for instance. Completely true, down to the name
> of the guy that did it...but it wasn't my daughter.
>
> No, I don't mean, 'It wasn't my daughter because I was
> playing a role,' I mean, 'It wasn't my daughter because
> that didn't happen to my daughter.' It happened, to
> someone else's daughter, and I knew about it when it
> happened, many many years prior to my telling (the victim
> was my age) and weaved it in to the tapestry. I integrated
> my own feelings of outrage considering the inherent
> vulnerability of my own child, and all children, to such
> sick fuckers, into the 'work.'
blah blah blah blah blah. So more "Netbastard" workings then?
Give it up, John, it's over, the cows have been milked, and you're
still an asshole either way for using that sort of story to get yourself
attention. Only a complete prick would use the rape and molestation of
a three-year old to get himself attention over the Internet.
Besides, we all know that it's true, that it was your daughter, and that
it all really happened. You can whine "BUT IT WASN'T ME IT WAS A
NETBASTARD WORK DAMMIT" until the cows come home and nobody is really
going to give much of a shit.
>
> A common technique of actors and others that attempt to
> emulate emotion is to draw on *real* emotion to enhance
> the quality and 'realism' of their performance.
But you are not an actor, and you barely classify as an "other."
Damn John...you are REALLY, REALLY, REALLY going off of the deep end
here. I suppose you would be in the depressive stage of manic
depression right now, am I correct? Or are you merely cycling through
bipolar? Enlighten me.
>
> I had no idea when I did that anyone would attempt to
> associate me, the real live human being, with 'me,'
Too many "me's" in there John. Your schizophrenia is shining through
quite nicely.
> the guy
> posting on a newsgroup about pro-wrestling. I had no idea
> someone would take the pieces of my 'work' and try to use
> them against me, the real live human being sitting here
> typing this. I underestimated the gullibility of people
> like you, and I underestimated just how far an asshole like
> you would go. How truly obsessed you can be. You make up
> your own facts and repeat them until you think they're
> true. You can't remember what I've made up and what you've
> made up anymore.
>
Blah blah blah blah blah. John, face it, I'm not "obsessed,"
you're a paranoid schizophrenic with bipolar disorder who suffers
from delusions of grandeur and dimentia, and you are one of the
biggest jackasses this side of Chad Bryant. I love how you're
backpedalling and all that other crap you posted above, but it's
simply not working in your favor. Wonder if Bogus Sting is lurking
and laughing his ass off at all of this?
> Her ma was pissed because she thought I hadn't told her
> something.
But you just said it wasn't your daughter, John. Can't you at
least TRY to keep your lies straight?
> *That* is why she was making noise about trying
> to restrict visitation (as if being 1000 miles away isn't
> 'restriction' enough...)
She should restrict visitation because you belong in the loony bin,
John. I hope that she knows this by now.
>
> > > If you don't, then you have no
> > > business coming off with this 'sure you haven't' crap.
> >
> > If you don't like me making deragatory
> > statements about you, that's tough.
>
> 'Derogatory statements' I have no problem with.
You apparantly do, since you go nutzo over anything posted about you
that's negative.
> You don't
> engage in 'derogatory statements,' you engage in out
> and out lies, slander, stalking, and attempted
> terrorism against anyone that dares suggest that a
> guy that can post 700 individual unique messages to a
> single newsgroup in a single week might have a few issues.
*spit take*
ATTEMPTED TERRORISM??????????????????
Hol-lee fooking SHEE-ITE. John Henry DeJong has just hit a new high in
his insane ramblings.
Congratulations, John! Give yourself a pat on the back! Don't bother
to take the knife out of your hand first. How'd I know you were holding
one? Call it a hunch.
And don't even get me started on the whole "few issues" thing.
*snicker*
>
> > You're not one to complain as
> > much as you make deragatory statements about me and others.
>
> You can start complainng about me when I take the same
> attitude toward your poor parents, who you used to support
> your dead ass so you could play a few more free years of
> slapass on a newsgroup, that you take toward my 'daughter.'
I didn't use my parents to get myself attention in the role as their
son, John. YOU used your role as a father to your child, your very own
DAUGHTER, to get yourself attention on RSPW. If you can't live with
that, then take your own life. Follow-up on that suicide threat you
made long ago.
>
> > > If you have evidence
> > > to the contrary, produce it.
>
> > No thanks. It's more fun to let you stew.
>
> = "I can't."
= "It's more fun watching you stew."
>
> > > > > Only you would associate
> > > > > a german authority from WWII with current law enforcement
> > > > > associations in the US.
>
> > > > Given your rampaging behavior,
>
> > > "Rampaging?" what, precisely, am I "rampaging" about?
>
> > Pretty much everything over the past 4 years.
>
> My 'rampages' are as real as my 'daughter's' 'assault.'
Now, now. We've already been through on your backpedalling issues.
>
> > > > your complete loss of mental facilities,
>
> > > And without any mental facilities whatsoever, I'm still
> > > able to think circles around you, as evidenced by your
> > > complete inability to keep up.
>
> > Awww...nice IKYWABAI.
>
> Resorting to cute acronyms only works if what they stand
> for is relevant to the portion of conversation being
> commented on, Dink.
They do, John, they do. It's not my fault you've so completely lost it
that you're unwilling to recognize that they do.
>
> > > And how are they at odds with the truth? Do
> > > you have evidence of this discrepancy?
>
> > I would consider Alicia a good source since you and her have actually
> > met.
>
> LOL When was this? did she tell you this? *I* sure as
> hell didn't! LOLOLOL. Never happened, Dinkster. Nobody
> here has ever, ever claimed it did.
'Tis a shame, I'd love to hear how she kneed you in the groin.
>
> > > > > I challenge you to
> > > > > assert your position and make a threat of violent death at
> > > > > your hand against the currently sitting president in this
> > > > > forum. Let's see if the SS is interested.
>
> > > > I'm not that stupid, John. YOU probably are, but I'm not.
>
> > > So you concede my point: your posturing claim of firsthand
> > > knowledge of events that occurred over a decade before your
> > > born as a way to demonstrate that the federal government
> > > has no interest in the rantings and ravings of net.kooks
> > > like you is meaningless.
>
> > No, it's not, John.
>
> Then you maintain that the secret service would have no
> interest in you if you claimed to have direct knowledge of
> a current attempt or planned attempt on the life of the
> president?
You're manipulating the facts again, John as YOU choose to do.
>
> IOW, you maintain that if your posturing had the simple
> additional attribute of being remotely believable, nobody
> would care. Your ORIGINAL point was that a confession is
> worthless as evidence of a crime. To prove it you
> 'confessed' to knowing who shot Kennedy - an event that you
> obviously could not have direct knowledge of. I challenge
> your proof by saying "If your confession was believable,
> you'd have a real problem on your hands. Put up or shut up
> - confess to something REAL, that you MIGHT have done...and
> see how easy it is to change your mind later." You say
> "I'm not that stupid," implying that to make such a
> confession would be to create a huge legal problem for
> you...which was my original point in the first place.
>
> Therefore, your posture is meaningless, unless you count
> that it supports my original assertion.
>
Ran through Babelfish and found more interesting translated into
Spanish. More coherant, too.
> > > Your fear of the government
> > > reading and responding to your words proves my original
> > > position on this point, which you disputed. Thanks.
>
> > There is no 'fear' involved John. I'm just not as stupid as you.
>
> What would make it stupid if there was nothing to be afraid
> of in doing it, dink?
Because it came from you.
Alex Cain [reposted because of rogue java dummy cancel]
>
> Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
>
> > John Henry and the horse he shot and ate for food wrote:
> > >
> > > Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
> > > back on Thu, 17 May 2001 07:17:56 GMT...
> > > > Sure you haven't.
> > > Evidence?
>
> > Did I say you had? You're the one reading into that statement John.
>
> been in jail.
Yes, I did, because given your online and offline behavior, I would
assume that you have indeed been incarcerated.
> If you have evidence which supports your
> challenge, then up with it.
If I did, I'd sit on it to let you stew :)
> If you don't, then you have no
> business coming off with this 'sure you haven't' crap.
I'll say what I want, John. If you don't like me making deragatory
statements about you, that's tough. You're not one to complain as
much as you make deragatory statements about me and others.
> Don't try to play my games, Dink - it takes a mind.
Which you don't have.
>
> > > > > I'm just pointing out what any good
> > > > > defense attorney knows - a defendant confession is almost
> > > > > inpossible to overcome in open court.
>
> > > > And how many times have YOU been in court, John?
>
> > > On criminal charges? None.
>
> > Evidence?
>
> I'm an eyewitness with the best possible access to the
> relevant corroborating information.
Mentally ill people are generally hard to use in court, John.
> If you have evidence
> to the contrary, produce it.
No thanks. It's more fun to let you stew.
>
> > > Only you would associate
> > > a german authority from WWII with current law enforcement
> > > associations in the US.
>
> > Given your rampaging behavior,
>
> "Rampaging?" what, precisely, am I "rampaging" about?
Pretty much everything over the past 4 years.
>
> > your complete loss of mental facilities,
>
> And without any mental facilities whatsoever, I'm still
> able to think circles around you, as evidenced by your
> complete inability to keep up.
Awww...nice IKYWABAI.
>
> > the descriptions of Alicia Snow,
>
> Which ones?
Where she calls you a "fucked-up redneck alcoholic," or something to
that effect.
> And how are they at odds with the truth? Do
> you have evidence of this discrepancy?
I would consider Alicia a good source since you and her have actually
met.
>
> > > YHBT.
>
> > it is a "work" or
> > a "troll," and you shouldn't believe otherwise.
>
> "Trolling" is the act of posting something in order to get
> a predefined response. My predefined response that I'm
> looking for is for you to start spouting bullshit, 'proof'
> of this and that 'event' that never happened in the first
> place, whenever I post some stupid bullshit that nobody
> with a brain would believe in the first place. Because I
> like watching you make yourself look really stupid.
Nice DeJong speak of backpedalling away from my definition of DeJong.
>
> YHBT.
>
You'd like to believe that, wouldn't you?
> > > I challenge you to
> > > assert your position and make a threat of violent death at
> > > your hand against the currently sitting president in this
> > > forum. Let's see if the SS is interested.
>
> > I'm not that stupid, John. YOU probably are, but I'm not.
>
> So you concede my point: your posturing claim of firsthand
> knowledge of events that occurred over a decade before your
> born as a way to demonstrate that the federal government
> has no interest in the rantings and ravings of net.kooks
> like you is meaningless.
No, it's not, John.
> Your fear of the government
> reading and responding to your words proves my original
> position on this point, which you disputed. Thanks.
There is no 'fear' involved John. I'm just not as stupid as you.
> --
> John Henry
> http://www.net-bastard.com
========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path: csnews.vslib.cz!more.work.for.guido
From: Alex Cain <alex...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sk.net.abuse,cz.net.abuse.misc,mn.test,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: cmsg cancel <3B0598...@yahoo.com>
Control: cancel <3B0598...@yahoo.com>
Date: 19 May 2001 06:06:58 GMT
Organization: Technical University of Liberec
Lines: 1
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <80515...@more.work.for.guido>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.122.7.24
X-Trace: morticia.kit.vslib.cz 990252187 6958 203.122.7.24 (19 May 2001 06:03:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: ne...@morticia.kit.vslib.cz
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 06:03:07 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: csnews.vslib.cz control.cancel:135822
more work for guido: <3B0598...@yahoo.com>
Alex Cain [reposted because of rogue java dummy cancel]
>
> Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
>
> > > You questioned the veracity of my assertion that I have not
> > > been in jail.
>
> > Yes, I did, because given your online and offline behavior, I would
> > assume that you have indeed been incarcerated.
>
>
> > > If you don't, then you have no
> > > business coming off with this 'sure you haven't' crap.
> >
> > If you don't like me making deragatory
> > statements about you, that's tough.
>
> 'Derogatory statements' I have no problem with.
You apparantly do, since you go nutzo over anything posted about you
that's negative.
> You don't
> engage in 'derogatory statements,' you engage in out
> and out lies, slander, stalking, and attempted
> terrorism against anyone that dares suggest that a
> guy that can post 700 individual unique messages to a
> single newsgroup in a single week might have a few issues.
*spit take*
ATTEMPTED TERRORISM??????????????????
Hol-lee fooking SHEE-ITE. John Henry DeJong has just hit a new high in
his insane ramblings.
Congratulations, John! Give yourself a pat on the back! Don't bother
to take the knife out of your hand first. How'd I know you were holding
one? Call it a hunch.
And don't even get me started on the whole "few issues" thing.
*snicker*
>
> > You're not one to complain as
> > much as you make deragatory statements about me and others.
>
> You can start complainng about me when I take the same
> attitude toward your poor parents, who you used to support
> your dead ass so you could play a few more free years of
> slapass on a newsgroup, that you take toward my 'daughter.'
I didn't use my parents to get myself attention in the role as their
son, John. YOU used your role as a father to your child, your very own
DAUGHTER, to get yourself attention on RSPW. If you can't live with
that, then take your own life. Follow-up on that suicide threat you
made long ago.
>
> > > If you have evidence
> > > to the contrary, produce it.
>
> > No thanks. It's more fun to let you stew.
>
> = "I can't."
= "It's more fun watching you stew."
>
> > > > > Only you would associate
> > > > > a german authority from WWII with current law enforcement
> > > > > associations in the US.
>
> > > > Given your rampaging behavior,
>
> > > "Rampaging?" what, precisely, am I "rampaging" about?
>
> > Pretty much everything over the past 4 years.
>
> My 'rampages' are as real as my 'daughter's' 'assault.'
Now, now. We've already been through on your backpedalling issues.
>
> > > > your complete loss of mental facilities,
>
> > > And without any mental facilities whatsoever, I'm still
> > > able to think circles around you, as evidenced by your
> > > complete inability to keep up.
>
> > Awww...nice IKYWABAI.
>
> Resorting to cute acronyms only works if what they stand
> for is relevant to the portion of conversation being
> commented on, Dink.
They do, John, they do. It's not my fault you've so completely lost it
that you're unwilling to recognize that they do.
>
> > > And how are they at odds with the truth? Do
> > > you have evidence of this discrepancy?
>
> > I would consider Alicia a good source since you and her have actually
> > met.
>
> LOL When was this? did she tell you this? *I* sure as
> hell didn't! LOLOLOL. Never happened, Dinkster. Nobody
> here has ever, ever claimed it did.
'Tis a shame, I'd love to hear how she kneed you in the groin.
>
> > > > > I challenge you to
> > > > > assert your position and make a threat of violent death at
> > > > > your hand against the currently sitting president in this
> > > > > forum. Let's see if the SS is interested.
>
> > > > I'm not that stupid, John. YOU probably are, but I'm not.
>
> > > So you concede my point: your posturing claim of firsthand
> > > knowledge of events that occurred over a decade before your
> > > born as a way to demonstrate that the federal government
> > > has no interest in the rantings and ravings of net.kooks
> > > like you is meaningless.
>
> > No, it's not, John.
>
> Then you maintain that the secret service would have no
> interest in you if you claimed to have direct knowledge of
> a current attempt or planned attempt on the life of the
> president?
You're manipulating the facts again, John as YOU choose to do.
>
> IOW, you maintain that if your posturing had the simple
> additional attribute of being remotely believable, nobody
> would care. Your ORIGINAL point was that a confession is
> worthless as evidence of a crime. To prove it you
> 'confessed' to knowing who shot Kennedy - an event that you
> obviously could not have direct knowledge of. I challenge
> your proof by saying "If your confession was believable,
> you'd have a real problem on your hands. Put up or shut up
> - confess to something REAL, that you MIGHT have done...and
> see how easy it is to change your mind later." You say
> "I'm not that stupid," implying that to make such a
> confession would be to create a huge legal problem for
> you...which was my original point in the first place.
>
> Therefore, your posture is meaningless, unless you count
> that it supports my original assertion.
>
Ran through Babelfish and found more interesting translated into
Spanish. More coherant, too.
> > > Your fear of the government
> > > reading and responding to your words proves my original
> > > position on this point, which you disputed. Thanks.
>
> > There is no 'fear' involved John. I'm just not as stupid as you.
>
> What would make it stupid if there was nothing to be afraid
> of in doing it, dink?
Because it came from you.
========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path: csnews.vslib.cz!more.work.for.guido
From: Alex Cain <alex...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sk.net.abuse,cz.net.abuse.misc,mn.test,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: cmsg cancel <3B0615...@yahoo.com>
Control: cancel <3B0615...@yahoo.com>
Date: 19 May 2001 07:04:11 GMT
Organization: Technical University of Liberec
Lines: 1
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <64735...@more.work.for.guido>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.122.7.24
X-Trace: morticia.kit.vslib.cz 990255621 7239 203.122.7.24 (19 May 2001 07:00:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: ne...@morticia.kit.vslib.cz
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 07:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: csnews.vslib.cz control.cancel:137068
more work for guido: <3B0615...@yahoo.com>
Alex Cain
>
> Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
>
> > John Henry and the horse he rode in on wrote:
> > > You haven't the slightest idea what I'm like offline, you
> > > idiot.
>
> > Oh I think I can fill in the blanks.
>
Only in your little world, John. Only in your little world.
>
> > Give it up, John, it's over, the cows have been milked, and you're
> > still an asshole either way for using that sort of story to get yourself
> > attention. Only a complete prick would use the rape and molestation of
> > a three-year old to get himself attention over the Internet.
>
> Only an idiot like you would be unable to realize that IT
> NEVER HAPPENED, dink.
John --- I know you love revisionist history and all --- but the
fact of the matter is, it doesn't matter if the rape and molestation
of a three-year-old actually happened or not. The fact of the matter
is, you used those very facts to get yourself attention. So, I stand
by my point, only a complete prick, such as yourself, would use the
rape and molestation of a three-year old, true or not, to get himself
attention online. Besides, nobody believes your bullcrap anyway, but
may I just say you're doing a lovely job on your revisionist history
in an attempt to stay sane. It's NOT WORKING, but it's a courageous
gesture nonetheless.
> I may as well have picked a name of
> a convicted abuser from the newspaper.
You probably tried, but thought people wouldn't believe you as much.
> Maybe that's what I
> *did*, and my 'friend' is yet another work.
*yawn* More of this 'work' shit. Revisionist history 101 from John
Henry "Schizphrenia" DeJong.
>
> > > A common technique of actors and others that attempt to
> > > emulate emotion is to draw on *real* emotion to enhance
> > > the quality and 'realism' of their performance.
>
> > But you are not an actor
>
> As relates to anything I post on RSPW, I am always acting,
...like an ass. Yes, I know.
> to some degree.
>
> > > I had no idea when I did that anyone would attempt to
> > > associate me, the real live human being, with 'me,'
>
> > Too many "me's" in there John. Your schizophrenia is shining through
> > quite nicely.
>
> I bet you refer to actors by the names of their characters
> too, don't you?
Only when they're good at it. But you will never achieve that level.
Ever. Period. For eternity. End of story!
>
> > Blah blah blah blah blah. John, face it, I'm not "obsessed,"
> > you're a paranoid schizophrenic with bipolar disorder who suffers
> > from delusions of grandeur and dimentia,
>
> That's like the 8th time you've misspelled that word in
> this thread.
Spelling it improperly does not make it untrue. By the way that
was a lovely deflection there, I congratulate you on your attempt
at doing so.
> Please support the above assertions with
> evidence or retract it immediately.
Your own postings, your paranoia-fueled rantings, your very nature is
all the evidence I need, John.
> Please include your
> qualifications as a doctor of psychiatry.
Sure! I have a PhD from Harvard, a DDS from Yale, and a PCP from Home
Depot.
>
> Or are you just trying to sound important by running a
> bunch of big words that you can barely pronounce together
> again?
No, I'm pretty much describing your mental state as it currently stands.
>
> > > Her ma was pissed because she thought I hadn't told her
> > > something.
>
> > But you just said it wasn't your daughter, John. Can't you at
> > least TRY to keep your lies straight?
>
> Jesus you're an idiot.
Oh, I don't know about that, John. I always felt Jesus was a pretty
intelligent guy. After all, guy's been dead for over 2,000 years and
he's STILL got people kissing his ass.
>
> > > *That* is why she was making noise about trying
> > > to restrict visitation (as if being 1000 miles away isn't
> > > 'restriction' enough...)
>
> > She should restrict visitation because you belong in the loony bin,
> > John. I hope that she knows this by now.
>
> Please provide your qualifications to make any judgement or
> public pronouncement on my fitness as a freely-acting
> member of society at large.
All of your postings for the past four years dictating veiled and direct
threats of physical violence, the way you've constantly, without fail,
shown yourself to have emotional and mental ties to RSPW, your threat of
suicide in 1999, and too much mentally-fueled paranoid rantings and
revisionist history from your person to count, without the use of
Google.
> Or are you just making up
> bullshit again because you woudln't know the truth if it
> fucked you in the ass?
No bullshit is involved, John, only your own words and rantings.
>
> > > > If you don't like me making deragatory
> > > > statements about you, that's tough.
> > >
> > > 'Derogatory statements' I have no problem with.
>
> > You apparantly do, since you go nutzo over anything posted about you
> > that's negative.
>
> Like made-up diagnoses based on a fucking fictional
> construct, that idiots like you actually believe is real?
When made-up diagnoseses occur, yes. However, there is nothing
yet to be made-up.
> No, I don't 'go nutzo,' dink -
You merely 'go Netbastard.' Same damn thing.
> I just have a vested
> interest in making damn sure that nobody, ever, believes
> the bullshit you spout.
Hmmmmmm that sounds a tad OBSESSIVE to me, wouldn't you say?
>
> > > You don't
> > > engage in 'derogatory statements,' you engage in out
> > > and out lies, slander, stalking, and attempted
> > > terrorism against anyone that dares suggest that a
> > > guy that can post 700 individual unique messages to a
> > > single newsgroup in a single week might have a few issues.
>
> > *spit take*
>
> > ATTEMPTED TERRORISM??????????????????
>
> Threatening to destroy a man's family if he doesn't
> cooperate with you would fall under the label of
> 'terrorism' to me, dink.
I never did that, John. Only your paranoid views and your
pseudo-revisionist history believe that I have. I merely
stated that I wanted your daughter to know just how big of
an asshole her father had been as it pertained to her alleged
assault...which you're now using revisionist history to claim
never happened and you SAID never happened.
>
> > I didn't use my parents to get myself attention in the role as their
> > son, John. YOU used your role as a father to your child, your very own
> > DAUGHTER,
>
> That is an absolute out and out lie.
So she's NOT your daughter? Your crack-addicted, stripper-whore
pleased the entire bar that night?
> I made up a story
> to sound like a badass, because that's the persona I was
> projecting at the time.
No, you told the truth, it bit you on the ass, now you're backpedalling
and trying to convince yourself more than others that what you did never
happened. The sad fact is, you're so far gone mentally that eventually
you'll do exactly that and in your mind you will never have posted those
things.
> No more, no less. Save for the
> fact that I came up with a real name in case anyone
> bothered to check on it,
Which you should never have done to begin with.
>it may as well have been a TV
> show.
Uh-huh.
> A story that bears no relationship to reality
At least, none that you're willing to recognize. See above for my
related comments.
> whatsoever, beyond the extent to which I drew on my life
> experiences to create the story.
Just more proof that you need serious mental help.
> Why can't you get that
> through your head?
Because you're lying and using revisionist history in an attempt to
convince yourself that you never did what you did.
> Why do you STILL insist that this has
> something to do with my child?
Because you used her as the main character in your little "story" John.
Duh.
> Are you an idiot, Dink?
No, but it appears you might be, for even considering using your own
daughter to get your fucked-up ego attention for yourself.
> Are you even sure I *have* a child?
Yea, pretty much, hard as it is to believe, but then you have fully
admitted that the night she was conceived, the crack-addicted whore
that passes as her mother was drunk and probably didn't have much of
an idea what she was doing or who she was doing it with.
> Are you SURE you're
> sure?
Yep. 100%.
>
> > They do, John, they do. It's not my fault you've so completely lost it
> > that you're unwilling to recognize that they do.
>
> I'm not the idiot winning awards for being such a Dink,
Wow. Text on a screen posted by hypocritical bigots with anger problems
(something I'm sure seems familiar to you). Voted on by a whopping dozen
people, no less. I'm crushed.
> Dink.
Jackass.
>
> > > > I would consider Alicia a good source since you and her have actually
> > > > met.
>
> > > LOL When was this? did she tell you this? *I* sure as
> > > hell didn't! LOLOLOL. Never happened, Dinkster. Nobody
> > > here has ever, ever claimed it did.
>
> > 'Tis a shame, I'd love to hear how she kneed you in the groin.
>
> Notice above there? You lie your ass off, make something
> up completely off the top of your head,
Sound familiar? It should. You do it all the time. And I said 'to
hear how she kneed you in the groin.' What part of a lie is that? I was
under the impression you two had met, you said you hadn't, I couldn't
find anything at that time to prove you had, so I simply stated what I
would love to hear had you two done so.
Now where's the lie in that, John?
> and try to pass it
> off as truth.
Exactly what you do all the time, by your own admittance within this
post. Is it painful being as big of a hypocrite as you are, or have
you developed a shield-like precision to keep yourself from all the
hypocricy that comes your way?
> Then when you're called on it, you buzz
> right by like you don't even see it.
Oh, you mean "pulling a Chad?"
>
> > > Then you maintain that the secret service would have no
> > > interest in you if you claimed to have direct knowledge of
> > > a current attempt or planned attempt on the life of the
> > > president?
>
> > You're manipulating the facts again, John as YOU choose to do.
>
> Do you or do you not maintain this position?
What position? Patting my head and rubbing my stomach at the same time?
>
> > > IOW, you maintain that if your posturing had the simple
> > > additional attribute of being remotely believable, nobody
> > > would care. Your ORIGINAL point was that a confession is
> > > worthless as evidence of a crime. To prove it you
> > > 'confessed' to knowing who shot Kennedy - an event that you
> > > obviously could not have direct knowledge of. I challenge
> > > your proof by saying "If your confession was believable,
> > > you'd have a real problem on your hands. Put up or shut up
> > > - confess to something REAL, that you MIGHT have done...and
> > > see how easy it is to change your mind later." You say
> > > "I'm not that stupid," implying that to make such a
> > > confession would be to create a huge legal problem for
> > > you...which was my original point in the first place.
>
> > > Therefore, your posture is meaningless, unless you count
> > > that it supports my original assertion.
>
> > Ran through Babelfish and found more interesting translated into
> > Spanish. More coherant, too.
>
> = "Oops."
= "John Henry's at it again, folks."
>
> > > > > Your fear of the government
> > > > > reading and responding to your words proves my original
> > > > > position on this point, which you disputed. Thanks.
>
> > > > There is no 'fear' involved John. I'm just not as stupid as you.
>
> > > What would make it stupid if there was nothing to be afraid
> > > of in doing it, dink?
>
> > Because it came from you.
>
> This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever
So take the Darvon or Prozac or Xantax or whatever it is you're pilling
this time.
> in the context of
> the conversation. As usual. Your obsession is having an
> obviously detrimental effect on your comprehensive
> abilities.
There is no obsession, John. Besides, you're the one who just
said, and I quote:
" I just have a vested interest in making damn sure
that nobody, ever, believes the bullshit you spout."
Gee, that sounds, oh, I don't know...obsessive, maybe?
Alex Cain
>
> Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
>
> There's so little material in your latest multi-hundred-
> line obsessive libellous rant at me that I haven't already
> proven false repeatedly, that I thought I'd share this lil
> gem that I came across the other day while googling my
> local dining newsfroup:
>
Meaning, you're dodging every point I made completely, because
your revisionist history and warped mental state won't allow
you to handle everything I brought up.
Thanks for tapping out, John. I was wondering how soon it
would happen.
(snip more revisionist history from John Henry DeJong)
Alex Cain
>
> Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
>
> > Meaning, you're dodging every point I made completely, because
> > your revisionist history and warped mental state won't allow
> > you to handle everything I brought up.
>
No, John, I did, and you avoided them entirely. I made several points,
among them:
--You claim that the entire fiasco where you whined that the mother
of your daughter was trying to take her away from your custody because
you mentioned her [daughter] abuse online, and now you are claiming,
through lies, deflections, and revisionist history, that you made the
entire thing up. I said that it didn't MATTER if you made it up ---
that anyone who would use the rape and molestation of a three-year old,
regardless of whether or not it was true, to get themselves attention
over the Internet, such as what YOU did, is a complete prick and more or
less a worthless human being. And I also made mention of the fact that
even if it WASN'T true, as you claim through your revisionist history,
it STILL meant that you were a poor father because you used your role as
a father in that entire attempt to get yourself attention through your
daughter in a matter such as that.
--You called me "obsessive" because I created a .sig that had quotes of
yours that made you look like the bullying jackass that you tend to be
while online. Yet then when I tried to show you to simply be paranoid
and disprove your claim, you backpedalled and changed stories in
mid-stream, then proved YOURSELF obessive by stating :
" I just have a vested interest in making damn sure
that nobody, ever, believes the bullshit you spout."
When I called you out on this, you simply posted a short paragraph
stating that you weren't going to answer any of the points that I
brought up in the post where I did.
--You claimed I was lying, in the issue of you and Alicia Snow having
met, but when I proved that all I had done was state that I would have
loved to have heard how she kneed you in the crotch HAD you two met, and
challenged you to show me the lie, you avoided it.
John you avoided so much in that post, it's incredible. I made several
valid points, including when you asked what made you a bad father and I
made a passing reference to your online suicide threat from 1999---all
of this you bypassed completely.
If you wish to read my words again, John, the references are there
above. Or the message ID is Message-ID: <3B07AB...@yahoo.com>
in case you want to go directly to it. And until you answer the points
that I made, I consider you having "tapped out."
I say that makes you a coward, by the way. If in your world that means
that I didn't make any points, so be it. But as I said ---
it's pretty sad, because you're so far gone mentally by this point in
time, that eventually you're going to believe what you're trying to get
yourself to believe...that you never actually posted any of it and none
of what you actually posted was true. It's the schizophrenia that's
doing it to you and it's almost sad to watch. Bogus Sting mentioned in
passing that he was reading all of these posts between you and I, and
even though he's reading this in "lurk mode," I'm sure that he would
agree with me that at this point, you're to be more pitied than mocked.
> My 'revisionist
> history' is merely a correction of previous untruths.
No, it's 'revisionist history' because you're having a difficult time
trying to convince yourself that you never did what you did in the role
as a father to your child, because of the disgusting levels at what you
did it and the circumstances of which it was done.
>
> > Thanks for tapping out, John. I was wondering how soon it
> > would happen.
>
> LOL tapping out.
Well, you pretty much did.
?congratulations, Dink - for the first
> time in your life, you can almost pretend you've succeeded
> at something, if you lie to yourself enough.
Something that you're still doing, it seems.
>
> BTW, because you snipped it and I think everyone should
> know just how much shit you're full of:
>
(snip)
I snipped your post, John, because it's full of shit. The same way that
Chad did a 180 and turned around claiming that Avenger getting me fired
never happened happened, Deja archives show him supporting the claim and
even threatening Avenger with legal action when it happened. Lo and
Behold, I go searching, and *gasp* I find the same thing about YOU! Why
is that? Well, because you're deflecting in classic John Henry DeJong
style --- you're trying to turn the attention towards ME, so that YOU
don't have to answer any of the points in the post that I made, a few of
which are repeated above.
Now go take on the day, or work on that POS site or whatever it is you
do.
Alex Cain
>
> Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
>
> > Sharon B wrote:
>
> > > I wasn't talking about history, Dink.
>
> > John telling flux not to post to HTML *is* RSPW history. You discuss it
> > and you are discussing RSPW history. There's just no ways around it,
> > sorry.
>
> But that's not what she was talking about, ya fuckin idiot.
> That's what YOU were talking about, which is of course
> completely irrelevant.
>
Not really---flux returned to posting to RSPW, because he wanted to (and
succeeded in) humilate/humiliating you.
> > > I wonder how much your friend flux appreciates your help in bringing
> > > him to AUK's notice via your xposting what his sock had to say about
> > > me.
>
> > Oh, given how he humiliated you and made several of you his personal
> > bitches, I'm sure he'd thank me quite a good deal.
>
> And yet they're still here, you're not.
Uhm I'm not here? You mean I'm not really posting this right now?
Wow, John, since when did YOU start studying the works of Plato?
> Note to a.u.k -
> I'm telling you, this guy is the real shit.
I bet you say that to all the people you backpedal to and dodge
questions from.
> Every bit as
> loopy as wollkook and gulley, perhaps even more so; I've
> never seen evidence that either of them were so amazingly
> gullible as to believe the shit a self-proclaimed hypocrite
> and liar posts on a wrestling newsgroup.
Read : "Get ready for another 'disappearance' of John Henry DeJong,
complete with Instant Sockpuppet(tm), within the next month or so."
John there is a reason there is a group called alt.bonehead.john-henry.
Maybe you should look back and remember why.
Alex Cain
>
> on Sun, 20 May 2001 12:59:05 -0400...
>
> > John Henry and the horse he rode in on wrote:
> > >
> > > on Sun, 20 May 2001 06:13:08 -0400...
> > >
> > > > John Henry and the horse he rode in on wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > time. Lends some credence to the theory that they're the
> > > > > same person....
> > > >
> > > > Who says I disappeared?
> > >
> > > What does Bert Heart's old tag partner have to do with
> > > this?
> >
> > Resorting to "who" jokes!? Even the lamest of the lame on RSPW have
> > given up on those. Oh how the mighty have fallen!
>
> The who joke is second only to Sid is Dead, the 4 Ultimate
> Warriors, Steve DiSalvo, and Imoud PA on the RSPW all-time
> jokes to run into the ground.
>
> > John, I've been letting you have free reign in your former playground,
> > and look what you've done--you immediately started up shit with Alex
> > Cain and haven't stopped since.
>
> Actually, he 'started' up shit, or mor accurately never
> stopped. I just started paying attention again.
Well hey what can I say, if I feel that you are a poor excuse
for a father and an even poorer excuse as a human being I'm
going to say so.
>
> > Whatever happened to blaming me for you
> > not being able to post about wrestling? Remember that?
>
> Yeah, it was years ago. I've gotten over it,
Apparantly, you haven't.
> and so has
> the rest of the world. In 2001 Usenet, the Killfile is
> King.
So killfile me then, John, and go back to your revisionist
history about your daughter.
>
> >
> > > > Also, if flux supposedly got TOS'ed by RCN/Erol's (which is what the AUK
> > > > people are speculating), and we're the same person, how is it I'm still
> > > > posting from Erol's server?
>
> > > First I've seen you since last I saw him. I stand
> > > (nominally) corrected.
>
> > That's about as close to admitting you're wrong as I'll ever hope to
> > get, so I'll take it.
>
> That's what you say *every* time, Stinky.
No, because you rarely admit being wrong.
>
> > > Although getting another erols account would be about as
> > > hard as signing up for one....
>
> > Whoops...take back what I said about you admitting you were wrong--I
> > should have known better.
>
> Just considering all the possibilities, Stinkypoo.
More like backpedalling.
> Like I
> said in another post, I could really give a rat's ass -
But you obviously do. Especially since you threatened to net.cop me
earlier tonight while on IRC.
> whether you're flux or not or whether the two of you are
> both tehawk who is actually mike palij posing as captain
> workrate or whatever, is of no concern to me.
So why do you respond so, then?
> Be you
> individual or facet, I don't much like you.
I'm sure the feeling is mutual.
> End of story.
But nobody lives happily ever after in this one, eh John?
>
> PS: I've done a TON of work on my website over the last
> week or so, you should check it out!
Yes, I've personally submitted it to several 'bad website of the day'
sites.
The Hawk
in on <netbasta...@net-bastard.com> wrote:
>Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
>back on Wed, 23 May 2001 23:13:13 GMT...
>
>I thought you weren't going to talk about it anymore if I
>apolgized and admitted it was stupid. I did both. Why are
>you still going on about it? You can't fucking help it,
>can you? You *are* obsessed, Dink, and you don't even
>realize it. You need serious fucking help, dude.
>
>And the post, as you'll recall, was actually *about* karma.
>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%22rape%22+group:rec.sport.pro-wrestling+author:John+author:Henry&num=30&lr=&safe=off&scoring=d&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=sddqvnqtlul94%40corp.supernews.com
>
>freak.
>
>> So I suppose that's another John Henry in rec.sport.pro-wrestling
>> talking about what happened to his daughter.
>
>No, that's John Henry trying to cover his ass after a dink
>dragged up a forgotten post, made anonymously, without just
>coming out and saying "the whole thing was bullshit."
>
>> > You're about two years late then. I've continued
>> > admitting that what I did was wrong and stupid,
>
>> Yes, but not this particular case.
>
>This particular case for the last two days stright, you
>fucking piece of garbage. YOU GET OFF ON THIS SHIT, DINK.
>You 8can't* stop talking about it. Face it, you are
>obsessed, and I'm afraid for my child's safety. Now, I'm
>telling you the same thing I told stevie, paraphrased: you
>say one more goddamned word about my daughter or anyone
>else in my family, and I'm going to the police in NC and
>georgie and appealing to the courts of both states to
>invoke a gag order applying *directly* to usenet and this
>newsgroup.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> And if you think it can't be done,
It can't
>or that no
>court will do it,
They won't
> I suggest you think again - the precedent
>was set not that long ago.
PULEASE!!!! PRovide proof of this.
>I've made my apology to the newsgroup *and* long ago
>already to my family - including my daughter, who is 100%
>aware of this situation. Now, you owe ME one, and that
>apology had better be your very, very last fucking word on
>the matter.
I never saw it, do it again. I thought you said your daughter was a
work?
>
>Ball's in your court asshole, and the next play is for the
>game. You decide - walk away, or I will with this in the
>proper manner, through the courts of NC, GA, and the United
>States. I *will* pay an attorney to shut you the fuck up
>about my family, Dink, it's that simple. I'm tired of
>being threatened by you, and I'm tired of having my family
>be the target of your obsessive, cruel, and very fucking
>sick games.
No lawyer in the WORLD would take this case.
>
>This is absolutely your final warning. The only other
>thing I'll post on the matter, come what may, will be my
>acceptance of your FULL APOLOGY for EVER having drug this
>out of DejJa in the first place, your FULL APOLOGY for
>targeting and encouraging others to target my offline life
>and my family, as well as others on this newsgroup, and
>your FULL APOLOGY for your role in making this a continuing
>topic of nauseating conversation here for the last 3 1/2
>years, long after it had been completely forgotten.
>ANYTHING LESS ends in court. Period. If I don't reply to
>your apology, you'll be hearing from my attorney within 48
>hours.
How is he doing on that Florida case for you?
The Hawk
in on <netbasta...@net-bastard.com> wrote:
>Check out the BS the...@rochester.rr.com tried to lay on
>us, back on Thu, 24 May 2001 22:12:23 GMT...
>
>> >telling you the same thing I told stevie, paraphrased: you
>> >say one more goddamned word about my daughter or anyone
>> >else in my family, and I'm going to the police in NC and
>> >georgie and appealing to the courts of both states to
>> >invoke a gag order applying *directly* to usenet and this
>> >newsgroup.
>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>http://www.vix.com/menmag/gagorder.htm
Got me there JoJo, but if you decide to pursue that course of action,
you will be in for as big a public scrutinizing as anyone, and that oh
giant forhead would sink you faster than the Titanic
The Hawk
in on <netbasta...@net-bastard.com> wrote:
>Check out the BS the...@rochester.rr.com tried to lay on
>us, back on Thu, 24 May 2001 22:12:23 GMT...
>
>> No lawyer in the WORLD would take this case.
>
>P.S, just in case you dind't *bother* checking that link I
>just posted< I wanted you to see this:
>
>"Det. Shirey testified that the Police Department had been
>monitoring the newsgroup for some time and had "a couple of
>3-inch ring binders of posts."
I read it JoJo and in fact, am shocked. Tip of the cap to you. Like I
said, IF you decide to choose this course (you won't), you are in for
it as much as anyone else. You did everything mentioned in the article
in fact. How would you answer that? You would look pretty stupid
brining such a case, but I bet that wouldn't be a first either, now
would it?
The Hawk
in on <netbasta...@net-bastard.com> wrote:
>Check out the BS the...@rochester.rr.com tried to lay on
>us, back on Thu, 24 May 2001 22:12:23 GMT...
>
>> No lawyer in the WORLD would take this case.
>
>P.S, just in case you dind't *bother* checking that link I
>just posted< I wanted you to see this:
>
>"Det. Shirey testified that the Police Department had been
>monitoring the newsgroup for some time and had "a couple of
>3-inch ring binders of posts."
John, serious, did you post under the Scott Abraham name in that
group? A few of the posts are yours almost word for word.
Alex Cain
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2001 17:33:10 -0400, John Henry and the horse he rode
> in on <netbasta...@net-bastard.com> wrote:
>
> >Check out the BS alex...@yahoo.com tried to lay on us,
> >back on Wed, 23 May 2001 23:13:13 GMT...
> >
> >I thought you weren't going to talk about it anymore if I
> >apolgized and admitted it was stupid. I did both. Why are
> >you still going on about it? You can't fucking help it,
> >can you? You *are* obsessed, Dink, and you don't even
> >realize it. You need serious fucking help, dude.
> >
> >And the post, as you'll recall, was actually *about* karma.
> >
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%22rape%22+group:rec.sport.pro-wrestling+author:John+author:Henry&num=30&lr=&safe=off&scoring=d&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=sddqvnqtlul94%40corp.supernews.
> >
> >
> >> So I suppose that's another John Henry in rec.sport.pro-wrestling
> >> talking about what happened to his daughter.
> >
> >No, that's John Henry trying to cover his ass after a dink
> >dragged up a forgotten post, made anonymously, without just
> >coming out and saying "the whole thing was bullshit."
> >
> >> > You're about two years late then. I've continued
> >> > admitting that what I did was wrong and stupid,
> >
> >> Yes, but not this particular case.
> >
> >This particular case for the last two days stright, you
> >fucking piece of garbage. YOU GET OFF ON THIS SHIT, DINK.
> >You 8can't* stop talking about it. Face it, you are
> >obsessed, and I'm afraid for my child's safety. Now, I'm
> >telling you the same thing I told stevie, paraphrased: you
> >say one more goddamned word about my daughter or anyone
> >else in my family, and I'm going to the police in NC and
> >georgie and appealing to the courts of both states to
> >invoke a gag order applying *directly* to usenet and this
> >newsgroup.
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's going to go the same way as his UDP against AOL.
>
> > And if you think it can't be done,
>
> It can't
But he wishes it could.
>
> >or that no
> >court will do it,
>
> They won't
Yep.
> > I suggest you think again - the precedent
> >was set not that long ago.
>
> PULEASE!!!! PRovide proof of this.
I request this as well.
>
> >I've made my apology to the newsgroup *and* long ago
> >already to my family - including my daughter, who is 100%
> >aware of this situation. Now, you owe ME one, and that
> >apology had better be your very, very last fucking word on
> >the matter.
>
> I never saw it, do it again. I thought you said your daughter was a
> work?
Well, first he said the story was a work, then he said the custody
dispute was a work (despite a court case ID), then he said his daughter
entirely was a work. So I am wondering how I am "harming" and
"threatening" a daughter and a family that does not exist?
>
> >
> >Ball's in your court asshole, and the next play is for the
> >game. You decide - walk away, or I will with this in the
> >proper manner, through the courts of NC, GA, and the United
> >States. I *will* pay an attorney to shut you the fuck up
> >about my family, Dink, it's that simple. I'm tired of
> >being threatened by you, and I'm tired of having my family
> >be the target of your obsessive, cruel, and very fucking
> >sick games.
>
> No lawyer in the WORLD would take this case.
You're forgetting about Columbo. Dont' tell John he isn't real,
it'll disappoint him.
> >
> >This is absolutely your final warning. The only other
> >thing I'll post on the matter, come what may, will be my
> >acceptance of your FULL APOLOGY for EVER having drug this
> >out of DejJa in the first place, your FULL APOLOGY for
> >targeting and encouraging others to target my offline life
> >and my family, as well as others on this newsgroup, and
> >your FULL APOLOGY for your role in making this a continuing
> >topic of nauseating conversation here for the last 3 1/2
> >years, long after it had been completely forgotten.
> >ANYTHING LESS ends in court. Period. If I don't reply to
> >your apology, you'll be hearing from my attorney within 48
> >hours.
>
> How is he doing on that Florida case for you?
Does the phrase 'hanging Chad' mean anything to you?
Alex Cain
Not to mention all his threats, lies, manipulations, "works," etc.